scholarly journals Prognostic Significance of I-Month Postdischarge BNP in Identifying Patients at High Risk of Mortality and Readmission After Decompensated Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Pravin K. Goel ◽  
Roopali Khanna ◽  
Aditya Kapoor ◽  
Kunal Mahajan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
P Value ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Acute Decompensation

Objective: The B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels could predict future cardiovascular events in congestive heart failure patients. Most studies have correlated basal BNP levels to long-term outcomes. Limited data exist on the prognostic significance of 1-month postdischarge BNP levels after acute heart failure. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted for worsening heart failure were enrolled. BNP was measured at admission, predischarge and at 1-month following discharge. Patients were followed for 1 year for end points of death and rehospitalization. Results: A total of 150 patients (mean age 60.8 + 13.8 years) were included in the heart failure study. 81 (54%) patients had acute heart failure secondary to acute coronary syndrome, while the rest (46%) had acute decompensation of chronic heart failure irrespective of etiology. Mean ejection fraction was 28.6 + 8.9%. 14 patients expired during hospitalization. BNP at admission was an important predictor of in hospital mortality ( P value = .003). Following discharge, 7 events (3 deaths and 4 rehospitalizations) occurred over next 1 month. 1-month outcome was predicted by baseline BNP ( P value = .01) as well as discharge BNP value ( P value = .001). A total of 55 events (26 rehospitalization and 29 deaths) occurred at follow-up of 1 year. Age > 50years, ejection fraction at baseline and all time sequential BNP levels (at admission, discharge, as well as 1 month) were univariate predictors of death and rehospitalization at 1 year. The BNP at 1 month had best discriminative power and remained the lone significant predictor in the multivariate analysis ( P = < .001). Conclusions: 1-month postdischarge BNP level is a useful prognostic factor that predicts mortality and rehospitalization at 1-year follow-up, in patients admitted with heart failure, and helps in identifying patients who need more intensive drug treatment and closer follow-up.

scholarly journals PROBLEMS AND SPECIFICITY OF DIAGNOSTICS OF ACUTE HEART FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE EJECTION FRACTION AT THE НОSPITAL STAGE

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. G. Skorodumova ◽  
V. A. Kostenko ◽  
E. A. Skorodumova ◽  
A. V. Rysev
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Diagnostic Errors ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Acute Decompensation

We analyzed ambulance diagnoses of patients with acute decompensation of heart failure with the background of the intermediate ejection fraction. In this category of patients acute decompensation of heart failure was diagnosed in-hospital, not associated with acute coronary syndrome, or other cardiological diseases. 78 variants of different diagnoses of referral of patients to the hospital at the prehospital stage were found, with a true diagnosis of acute decompensation of heart failure being established in only patients. All diagnoses were divided into 6 groups with the subsequent analysis of the causes of diagnostic errors.

Do Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction Have Heart Failure at Follow-Up: Implications of the Framingham Criteria

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 673-684
Author(s):  
CAMILLA HAGE ◽  
ULRIKA LÖFSTRÖM ◽  
ERWAN DONAL ◽  
EMMANUEL OGER ◽  
AGNIESZKA KAPŁON-CIEŚLICKA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

Long-term systolic blood pressure and all-cause mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the TOPCAT trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Huang ◽  
C Liu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission or discharge was associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the optimal long-term SBP for HFpEF was less clear. Purpose To examine the association of long-term SBP and all-cause mortality among patients with HFpEF. Methods We analyzed participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study. Participants had at least two SBP measurements of different times during the follow-up were included. Long-term SBP was defined as the average of all SBP measurements during the follow-up. We stratified participants into four groups according to long-term SBP: &lt;120mmHg, ≥120mmHg and &lt;130mmHg, ≥130mmHg and &lt;140mmHg, ≥140mmHg. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all-cause mortality associated with SBP level. To assess for nonlinearity, we fitted restricted cubic spline models of long-term SBP. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by confining participants with history of hypertension or those with left ventricular ejection fraction≥50%. Results The 3338 participants had a mean (SD) age of 68.5 (9.6) years; 51.4% were women, and 89.3% were White. The median long-term SBP was 127.3 mmHg (IQR 121–134.2, range 77–180.7). Patients in the SBP of &lt;120mmHg group were older age, less often female, less often current smoker, had higher estimated glomerular filtration rate, less often had history of hypertension, and more often had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. After multivariable adjustment, long-term SBP of 120–130mmHg and 130–140mmHg was associated with a lower risk of mortality during a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.49–0.85, P=0.001; HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88, P=0.004, respectively); long-term SBP of &lt;120mmHg had similar risk of mortality (HR 1.03, 95% CI: 0.78–1.36, P=0.836), compared with long-term SBP of ≥140mmHg. Findings from restricted cubic spline analysis demonstrate that there was J-shaped association between long-term SBP and all-cause mortality (P=0.02). These association was essentially unchanged in sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Among patients with HFpEF, long-term SBP showed a J-shaped pattern with all-cause mortality and a range of 120–140 mmHg was significantly associated with better outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials need to evaluate optimal long-term SBP goal in patients with HFpEF. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Foundation. Main funding source(s): China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant (2019M660229 and 2019TQ0380)

Factors associated with successful return to work in young heart failure and ischaemic heart disease patients following index hospital admission

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
HV Thakkar ◽  
L Hollingsworth ◽  
JA Enright ◽  
S Sanderson ◽  
RJ Macfadyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Individual Factors ◽  
P Value ◽  
Complex Interplay ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Financial Benefits ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Factors influencing return to remunerated work following an acute cardiac illness are poorly defined. We wished to compare the factors in our cohorts following first presentation of acute coronary syndrome(ACS) and decompensated heart failure(HF). Methods Prospectively identified subjects, aged 18-65years, from a rehabilitation population for ACS and HF during 2018-2019 underwent a survey. Results Of 133cases meeting inclusion criteria, 84 completed the survey(41 HF, 80% male, mean age 55years; 43 ACS, 86% male, mean age 57years). Socio-economic indexes for Areas(SIEFA) index were similar for HF(900) & ACS(909) groups, which represents 11th and 14th percentile for Australia respectively. Cardiovascular risk factors were similar except hypercholesterolemia(37% v 60%; p = 0.029) was more common in ACS. Many subjects did not continue beyond Yr12, (54% HF v 30% ACS; p = 0.029). A majority of ACS cases returned to work as compared with HF(70% v 44%; p = 0.017)(Figure). On multivariate analysis, male gender[p = 0.031;OR 13.71 (1.28-147.36)]; access to financial benefits[p &lt; 0.001;OR 22.75 (4.31-119.99)] and a desire to return to work [p = 0.014;OR 12.1 (1.67-87.82)] were associated with successful return to work (Table). Limitations Our study has small numbers so will be difficult to generalise to a wider population. We do show a signal towards the complex interplay of the social and individual factors in determining return to work. Further larger studies are required to tease out the differences between the individual factors to help predict return to work in the Australian context. Conclusion Successful return to work for patients with first presentation of ACS or HF could not be reliably predicted. Patients with ACS returned to work more often than HF. In HF patients who do n to return to work, recurrent symptoms, individual motivation, social support and access to financial benefits have a complex interplay. Predictors of return to work Predictor P value OR (95% CI) Diagnosis (heart failure) 0.095 0.29 (0.07, 1.24) Gender (male) 0.031 13.71 (1.28, 147.36) Access to benefit (none) &lt;0.001 22.75 (4.31, 119.99) Desire to RTW (yes) 0.014 12.1 (1.67, 87.82) Abstract Figure. Rates of return to work in the 2 groups

Abstract 284: Length Of Stay In Index Hospitalization Of Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction As A Factor For 30-day Readmission And 1-year Mortality

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Saith ◽  
Ciril Khorolsky ◽  
Anuragh Trikha ◽  
Tamta Chkhikvadze ◽  
Jung-eun Ha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
The United States ◽  
P Value ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Index Hospitalization ◽  
One Year

Introduction: Heart Failure is one of the leading causes of readmission in the United States. Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) accounts for a growing proportion of heart failure hospitalizations and accounts for approximately half of hospitalizations today. Unlike Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF), there are no consensus-driven guidelines for the management of HFpEF. Methods: We collected demographic data, co-morbidities, laboratory and echocardiographic data on patients hospitalized with HFpEF throughout our health care system between August 2016 to August 2017. We assessed length of stay (LOS), whether the patient was re-admitted for any cause within 30 days and whether the patient died within 1 year of index hospitalization. We performed a Wilcoxon rank-sum test comparing patients who were both readmitted within 30 days for any reason and died within 1 year, against patients who were readmitted but were verified alive at one-year follow-up. Results: There were 366 patients hospitalized for HFpEF during the study period. Overall 30-day readmission rate was 24.3%, with a one-year mortality of 19.9%. One-year outcomes was verifiable for 359 patients. There were 27 patients who were readmitted within 30 days and died within one year of follow-up. Median LOS was significantly greater in patients during index hospitalization who died within 1 year of follow-up (Median LOS: 8 days, IQR 5-10 days), compared to patients who were readmitted within 30 days, but were alive at 1-year follow-up (Median LOS: 5 days, IQR: 3-8 days; p-value = 0.001). Conclusions: Among patients who were re-hospitalized within 30 days of an index hospitalization for HFpEF, LOS was significantly greater than patients who died within one year, compared to patients who remained alive at one-year follow-up. This may help identify a high-risk subset on index hospitalization and assist care transition teams and primary care physicians at follow-up in regarding discussions on goals of care and life sustaining treatments.

scholarly journals Six-Month Predictive Value of Diuretic Resistance Formulas in Discharged Heart Failure Patients after an Acute Decompensation

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2932
Author(s):  
Mauro Feola ◽  
Arianna Rossi ◽  
Marzia Testa ◽  
Cinzia Ferreri ◽  
Alberto Palazzuoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Heart Failure Patients ◽  
Acute Decompensation ◽  
Diuretic Response

Background. The diuretic response has been shown to be a robust independent marker of cardiovascular outcomes in acute heart failure patients. The objectives of this clinical research are to analyze two different formulas (diuretic response (DR) or response to diuretic (R-to-D)) in predicting 6-month clinical outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients discharged alive after an acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) were enrolled. All patients underwent N-terminal-pro hormone BNP (NT-proBNP) and an echocardiogram together with DR and R-to-D calculation during diuretic administration. Death by any cause, cardiac transplantation and worsening heart failure (HF) requiring readmission to hospital were considered cardiovascular events. Results: 263 patients (62% male, age 78 years) were analyzed at 6-month follow-up. During the follow-up 58 (22.05%) events were scheduled. Patients who experienced CV-event had a worse renal function (p = 0.001), a higher NT-proBNP (p = 0.001), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.01), DR (p = 0.02) and R-to-D (p = 0.03). Spearman rho’s correlation coefficient showed a strong direct correlation between DR and R to D in all patients (r = 0.93; p < 0.001) and both in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (r = 0.94; p < 0.001) and HF preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (r = 0.91; p < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, a value of R-to-D <1.69 kg/40 mg, but only <0.67 kg/40 mg for DR were significantly related to poor 6-month outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.05, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses demonstrated that DR and R-to-D are equivalent in predicting prognosis (area under curve (AUC): 0.39 and 0.40, respectively). Only R-to-D was inversely related to in-hospital stay (r = −0.23; p = 0.01). Conclusion: Adding diuresis to DR seemed to provide a better risk assessment in alive HF patients discharged after an acute decompensation.

P6471Pronostic impact of significant valvular disease in long-term survivors of out-of-hospital-cardiac arrest

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Rodriguez ◽  
J Caro-Codon ◽  
J R Rey-Blas ◽  
S O Rosillo ◽  
O Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Percutaneous Treatment ◽  
Valvular Disease ◽  
Temperature Management ◽  
P Value ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background There is scarce evidence about the prevalence and clinical relevance of moderate to severe valvular heart disease (VHD) in survivors of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Purpose To determine whether VHD influence prognosis of OHCA survivors. Methods All consecutive patients admitted to the Acute Cardiac Care Unit after OHCA and surviving until hospital discharge were included. All patients received targeted-temperature management according to our local protocol. Univariate and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard models were employed. Results A total of 201 patients were included in the analysis. Mean age was 57.6±14.2 years and 168 (83.6%) were male. Eighteen patients (9.0%) had moderate or severe VHD during index admission (Table 1). Patients with VHD were less frequently of male sex, [11 (61.1%) vs 157 (85.8%), p=0.014], experienced less acute coronary syndrome-related arrhytmias [2 (11.1%) vs 85 (46.5%), p=0.005], and had a lower pH at hospital admission (6.9±1.6 vs 7.2±0.15, p=0.008). During a median follow-up of 40.3 (18.9–69.1) months, patients with VHD showed higher mortality [7 (38.9%) vs 28 (15.3%), p=0.004] and more heart failure-related admissions [7 (38.9%) vs 15 (8.2%), p<0.001]. Only five patients received surgical or percutaneous treatment for VHD during follow-up, with no deaths in this subgroup. Moderate or severe VHD proved to be an independent predictor of global cardiovascular events and specifically heart failure episodes (Figure 1). Table1 Variable With valvular disease Without valvular disease p value Age, mean±DS, years 63.5±13.2 57.0±14.1 0.066 Hypertension, n (%) 12 (66.7) 95 (51.9) 0.231 Diabetes, n (%) 5 (27.8) 24 (13.1) 0.149 Dyslipidaemia, n (%) 7 (38.9) 79 (43.2) 0.726 Smokin habit, n (%) 4 (22.2) 90 (49.2) 0.045 Witnessed cardiac arrest, n (%) 18 (100) 175 (95.6) 1.000 Time from CA to ROSC, mean±DS, minute 19.1±7.5 21.2±13.1 0.506 Shockable rhythm, n (%) 13 (72.2) 163 (89.1) 0.055 LVEF at hospital discharge (%) 42.8±12.1 46.9±14.6 0.254 Figure 1 Conclusion The presence of significant VHD in survivors after OHCA is a predictor of poor outcomes. Specific management of VHD may be specially relevant in this high-risk patients and guideline-oriented therapy, including surgery and percutaneous intervention should be encouraged when indicated.

scholarly journals Prognostic importance of acute heart failure persistence in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e000100
Author(s):  
Sergey Kozhukhov ◽  
Alexander Parkhomenko ◽  
Nataliia Dovganych
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Infarct Size ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
St Elevation

Introduction: Acute heart failure (AHF) is one of the most frequent complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is not only associated with a several-fold increase of in-hospital mortality but also, worsens the long-term survival in comparison to those without AHF. The AHF is observed to be more in AMI patients whose in-hospital stay is more than 3 days. The clinical implications and prognostic accuracy of the AHF term in the setting of AMI are yet unknown. Methods: We observed 1,104 consecutive cardiac care patients, who were admitted with ST-elevation AMI (STEMI). They were divided into groups according to the AHF presence {AHF(+) n=334 and AHF(-) n=764}. Among 334 AHF(+) patients: 252 patients were found to have a transient AHFt(+), whereas 82 of AHF(+) patients had persistent AHFp(+) during in-hospital period.  Patients' baseline characteristics, blood analysis, left ventricle (LV) and renal function data were assessed and analyzed on the admission day and 10th day post-admission. The follow-up was conducted on the 30th day and after 2 years. Results. STEMI patients accompanied by AHF(+) were older, presented mostly with anterior AMI (p<0.01), had lower LV ejection fraction (EF) (p<0.01) and a higher heart rate (p<0.05). Their rates of comorbidities and of in-hospital complications such as recurrent angina, reinfarction, LV aneurism were higher in comparision to AHF(-) patients. AHFp(+) patients had the shortest time from symptoms onset before thrombolysis in comparision to AHFt(+) and AHF(-) groups. Partial recovery of cardiac function according to Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-systolic volume index, occurred mainly in AHF(-) and AHFt(+) patients on the 10th day post-admission, but not in AHFp(+). STEMI patients with AHFp(+) demonstrated a larger infarct size, higher C-reactive protein and VGEF level, fasting glucose and heart rate on admission, higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate, absence of heart rate normalization on the 10th day post-admission. All of these markers were the signs of severe myocardial damage and inflammation, which can reflect worse recovery in AHF patients despite optimal management. Patients with AHF(+) had renal dysfunction on admission while its creatinine clearance (CrCl) decreased during the in-hospital period which is the reflection of a poor prognosis. Сardiovascular mortality and non-fatal MI were significantly higher in the AHFp(+) group as compared to the AHFt(+) and the AHF(–) groups during the 30 days and 2 years of follow-up. Conclusion: The AHF is a frequent STEMI complication. AHF lasting >3 days had worse short- and long-term prognosis. Therefore, an aggressive strategy should be recommended particularly in patients who have clinical signs and symptoms of persistent AHF. Keywords: myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, infarct size, survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document