Dry Needling for the Treatment of Musculoskeletal Ailments With Trigger Points

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 263502542110237
Author(s):  
Simon J. Padanilam ◽  
Steven R. Dayton ◽  
Ryan Jarema ◽  
Michael J. Boctor ◽  
Vehniah K. Tjong

Background: Dry needling is an increasingly popular technique for relieving musculoskeletal pain, through targeting myofascial trigger points. Existing evidence indicates that dry needling is effective in short-term management of pain, with research showing efficacy in improving functional outcomes when compared to other treatments. Indications: Myofascial trigger points may result in range of motion limitations and muscle weakness. Noninvasive treatments for musculoskeletal pain associated with myofascial trigger points, such as stretching or warm compresses, may not provide significant benefit for patients. Dry needling is a minimally invasive technique that provides significant short-term functional improvement and analgesia for musculoskeletal pain associated with myofascial trigger points, seen with reductions in visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores and decreased need for pharmacologic therapies. Technique Description: This video demonstrates dry needling at the tensor fascia latae, extensor carpi radialis longus, and gastrocnemius muscles. Myofascial trigger points and important anatomical landmarks are identified and labeled. A needle is inserted into the region of the myofascial trigger point to a depth of 10 to 100 mm and remains in situ for about 10 to 20 seconds with the use of a piston technique, although this time varies dependent upon patient response. Results: Dry needling may significantly decrease pain and improve functional outcomes in patients with short-term musculoskeletal ailments. Randomized controlled trials have examined dry needling for fibromyalgia, mechanical neck pain, myofascial pain, and following total knee arthroplasty, with these finding significant reductions in pain scores in short-term follow-up. A randomized single-blind placebo-controlled trial found dry needling with exercise to be more effective than sham dry-needling and exercise. Dry needling may provide improved long-term analgesia but also results in increased pain during the procedure and increased soreness afterwards. Pain relief may not last beyond 6 months, although little research investigating long-term outcomes has been performed. Discussion/Conclusion: The usage of dry needling in clinical settings is increasing, as it has shown strong efficacy in providing short-term pain relief and ability to improve functional outcomes. Dry needling is a simple, minimally invasive technique that is easily and quickly learned by physical therapists and may provide great benefits to patients.

2021 ◽  
pp. 096452842110275
Author(s):  
Carolina Jiménez-Sánchez ◽  
Julio Gómez-Soriano ◽  
Elisabeth Bravo-Esteban ◽  
Orlando Mayoral-del Moral ◽  
Pablo Herrero-Gállego ◽  
...  

Background: Myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are hypersensitive nodules in a taut band (TB) of skeletal muscle. Dry needling (DN) is an invasive technique recommended for the treatment of MTrPs. However, to our knowledge, no studies have investigated the influence of the DN technique on modification of muscle stiffness and neurophysiological properties of MTrPs. Objective: The objective was to examine the effect of DN on muscle stiffness and motoneuron excitability of a latent medial MTrP (nodule and TB) of the soleus muscle in non-injured subjects. Methods: A double-blinded randomised controlled trial of 46 subjects with latent medial MTrPs of the soleus was conducted, in which all received one session of DN. The intervention group (n = 23) were subjected to DN into the MTrP (the nodule), while the control group (n = 23) were subjected to DN into the TB. Assessment was carried out at baseline (pre-test), after the intervention (post-test) and 1 week after the intervention (follow-up). Biomechanical variables (muscle resistive force at 10°/s and 180°/s, muscle extensibility and strength), as measured with an isokinetic dynamometer, and neurophysiological variables (H-reflex), were recorded. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in biomechanical or neurophysiological assessments between groups. Considering the intra-group analysis, subjects in the intervention group exhibited increased maximal isometric voluntary force to ankle plantarflexion (MIVFp) at both post-intervention and follow-up assessment (p < 0.0125; 0.2 < d < 0.5), while no changes were found in the control group. Conclusion: One session of DN targeting latent MTrPs did not change muscle stiffness, muscle extensibility or motoneuron excitability. Further research on subjects with muscle tone disorders should be considered to better address the impact of DN on muscle tone. Trial registration number: NCT02575586 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Garcia-de-Miguel ◽  
Daniel Pecos-Martin ◽  
Tamara Larroca-Sanz ◽  
Beatriz Sanz-de-Vicente ◽  
Laura Garcia-Montes ◽  
...  

Procedures such as dry needling (DN) or percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS) are commonly proposed for the treatment of myofascial trigger points (MTrP). The aim of the present study is to investigate if PENS is more effective than DN in the short term in subjects with mechanical neck pain. This was an evaluator-blinded randomized controlled trial. Subjects were recruited through announcements and randomly allocated into DN or PENS groups. Pain intensity, disability, pressure pain threshold (PPT), range of motion (ROM), and side-bending strength were measured. The analyses included mixed-model analyses of variance and pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. The final sample was composed of 44 subjects (22 per group). Both groups showed improvements in pain intensity (ηp2 = 0.62; p < 0.01), disability (ηp2 = 0.74; p < 0.01), PPT (ηp2 = 0.79; p < 0.01), and strength (ηp2 = 0.37; p < 0.01). The PENS group showed greater improvements in disability (mean difference, 3.27; 95% CI, 0.27–6.27) and PPT (mean difference, 0.88–1.35; p < 0.01). Mixed results were obtained for ROM. PENS seems to produce greater improvements in PPT and disability in the short term.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-91
Author(s):  
Marc Brodsky

The Arts Medicine Master Class case discussion on Myofascial Pain in a Guitarist (MPPA December 2005) reinforced some of the take-home points from an earlier article entitled An Innovative Patient-centered Approach to Common Playing-related Pain Conditions in Musicians (MPPA December 2004)2 and the more recent abstract presentation and workshop at the 2005 Aspen Conference: 1) myofascial trigger points are a common component of pain syndromes; 2) the short-term solution to myofascial pain is addressing trigger points, and the longterm solution is managing potentiators of pain (practice habits, posture, ligament laxity, psychological stress, etc.); and 3) self-care can contribute to the short-term and long-term solutions to myofascial pain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-139
Author(s):  
Eldad Kaljić ◽  
Namik Trtak ◽  
Dijana Avdić ◽  
Samir Bojičić ◽  
Bakir Katana ◽  
...  

Introduction: Dry needling is a therapeutic procedure using the insertion of thin needles through the skin into myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), muscular or connective tissue with the aim to reduce pain intensity. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the literature for the efficacy of the dry needle technique in pain reduction in conditions of musculoskeletal pain caused by MTrPs. Reference Sources: Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOhost database were searched for studies and e-books published from January 2010 to December 2018. Studies Selection: We included randomized controlled studies, prospective and longitudinal studies, and case studies which analyzed the efficacy of dry needling for musculoskeletal pain reduction. Data Extraction Method: The studies, which satisfied criteria for inclusion were further analyzed. The primary instrument of the evaluation was pain intensity analyses. Results: Dry needling treatment is efficient in pain intensity reduction in patients who suffer musculoskeletal pain and is more efficient compared to sham dry needling treatment. In addition, different techniques of dry needling are efficient in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. Conclusion: Based on systematic review of the literature, dry needling, independently or as an addition to other intervention, is recommended for treatment of musculoskeletal pain conditions caused by myofascial trigger points. Various techniques of dry needling treatment are almost equally efficient in myofascial pain intensity reduction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Matthew Drescher ◽  
Matthew Rivera ◽  
Lindsey Eberman

Low back pain is a common health concern. The development of myofascial trigger points due to low back pain can cause debilitating pain and loss of functional movement in patients. Dry needling is a minimally invasive procedure that has shown to be useful in the treatment of myofascial trigger points when used with other forms of treatment. However, the literature surrounding dry needling and myofascial trigger points in patients with low back pain is lacking. The guiding systematic review and meta-analysis sought to analyze the effectiveness of dry needling for patients with low back pain. The review utilized eight databases for randomized controlled trials and selected 11 of 784 articles for analysis based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. A 6-subgroup meta-analysis was conducted on these studies, and 6 of the 11 studies were found to have high risk of bias. The included studies used both pain measurements and functional measurements including the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). The studies did not include objective functional measurements. Overall researchers found a clinically meaningful decrease in outcome scores in the short-term, but there were no significant differences in pain or functional outcomes through long-term follow-up. This seems to correlate with the current literature on dry needling and its inflammatory effects on the body, suggesting that dry needling alone does not provide any long-term effect on myofascial trigger points in patients with low back pain. Dry needling should be combined with other treatments and high-quality rehabilitation to provide longer-lasting results and better treatment outcomes for patients with low back pain.


Clinical Pain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
Joonhyun Park ◽  
Hyunseok Kwak ◽  
Wookyung Park ◽  
MinYoung Kim ◽  
Kyunghoon Min

Author(s):  
Ting Kai Leung ◽  
Ming Tse Lin ◽  
Shu-Chen Lin

Objective: Tele-health care service of alternative practice for chronic pain disease is worthwhile of developing, especially in the period of COVID-19 pandemic. Targeting on myofascial trigger points, this study was performed to assess the possible short-term pain relief and functional improvement in patients by applying the device of BIOCERAMIC material enhanced by frequencies of tempo sound and visible light spectrum (BioS&L).<br><br>Methods: Fourteen patients who participated in the procedure for the selection of trigger points for the BioS&L treatment, assessment of pain levels using a visual analog scale (VAS) analysis, and detection of abnormal resonance of 12 harmonic frequencies using a quantum resonance spectrometer (QRS).<br><br>Results: Comparing the pre-and post-treatment of BioS&L on pain score of 12 HFs(V1-V12) as measured by VAS estimated by mixed model showed 91.7% (11/12) improvement with statistically significant results. The distribution of differences in the QRS score estimated by the mixed model among participants with pre-test QRS level ≥ 2 showed 83.3% (15/16) of HFs with statistically significant results.<br><br>Conclusion: Treatment of BioS&L at trigger points providing pain relief is explained by the hypothesis of microvascular physiology and physics of wave propagation. This study provides a workshop with a concept of digitalization of complementarity and traditional medical service and tele-health care, which fulfils distant data connection and remote practice. In the period of epidemic spread, it helps to decrease close contact on both health care providers and patients.


1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 704-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Elaine Chapman

Physical modalities, including cold and heat, are widely used in the conservative management of pain associated with musculoskeletal disorders. This review has critically appraised the literature supporting the use of these modalities in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. It was concluded that, apart from a few exceptions and in a few types of disorders, existing evidence does not support the use of these modalities in long-term pain control. There was, however, evidence that several modalities, specifically cold and a form of deep heat (shortwave diathermy), do have short-lived analgesic effects and so may contribute to more painfree function in the short term. Further research is clearly warranted to define the short- and long-term therapeutic efficacy of physical modalities in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain to justify their continued use in clinical practice.Key words: pain control, cold, heat, ultrasound, low-power laser.


BMJ Open ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. e002825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Abbaszadeh-Amirdehi ◽  
Noureddin Nakhostin Ansari ◽  
Soofia Naghdi ◽  
Gholamreza Olyaei ◽  
Mohammad Reza Nourbakhsh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document