Proteomic analysis reveals presence of platelet microparticles in endothelial progenitor cell cultures

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 723-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Prokopi ◽  
Giordano Pula ◽  
Ursula Mayr ◽  
Cécile Devue ◽  
Joy Gallagher ◽  
...  

Abstract The concept of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) has attracted considerable interest in cardiovascular research, but despite a decade of research there are still no specific markers for EPCs and results from clinical trials remain controversial. Using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, we analyzed the protein composition of microparticles (MPs) originating from the cell surface of EPC cultures. Our data revealed that the conventional methods for isolating mononuclear cells lead to a contamination with platelet proteins. Notably, platelets readily disintegrate into platelet MPs. These platelet MPs are taken up by the mononuclear cell population, which acquires “endothelial” characteristics (CD31, von Willebrand factor [VWF], lectin-binding), and angiogenic properties. In a large population-based study (n = 526), platelets emerged as a positive predictor for the number of colony-forming units and early outgrowth EPCs. Our study provides the first evidence that the cell type consistent with current definitions of an EPC phenotype may arise from an uptake of platelet MPs by mononuclear cells resulting in a gross misinterpretation of their cellular progeny. These findings demonstrate the advantage of using an unbiased proteomic approach to assess cellular phenotypes and advise caution in attributing the benefits in clinical trials using unselected bone marrow mononuclear cells (BMCs) to stem cell-mediated repair.

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 709-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J Olszewski ◽  
Peter Barth ◽  
John L. Reagan

Abstract Background. The International Myeloma Working Group guideline recommends administration of bone-modifying agents (BMA) for all patients starting therapy for myeloma (Terpos et al, JCO 2013). In clinical trials, BMA lower the risk of skeletal-related events (SRE), and, unexpectedly, they have improved overall survival (OS, Morgan et al, Lancet 2010). The American Society of Clinical Oncology (Anderson et al, JCO 2018) recommends use of zoledronate, pamidronate, or denosumab, however adherence to this guideline in clinical practice is unknown. Our objective was to examine the use of BMA among Medicare beneficiaries treated for myeloma, associated incidence of SRE, and OS. Methods. From the linked Medicare and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER-Medicare) data base, we selected patients age ≥65 with myeloma diagnosed in 2007-2013, who had complete Medicare claims (including oral immunomodulatory anti-myeloma drugs [IMiDs]) and who received outpatient chemotherapy. We defined the "use of BMA" as administration of zoledronate, pamidronate, or denosumab within 90 days of first chemotherapy. We examined factors associated with omission of BMA in a hierarchical generalized linear model for relative risk (RR, with 95% confidence intervals, CI). To avoid guarantee-time bias and late complications, we analyzed time-to-event outcomes using time at risk between 90 days and 3 years from the start of therapy. We identified incident SRE (defined as axial or extremity fracture, or cord compression), and OS. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) of SRE was compared in a competing risk model (reporting subhazard ratio, SHR), and OS in a Cox model (reporting hazard ratio, HR). We then applied 1:1 propensity score matching to compare the average effect of BMA on SRE and OS among treated patients. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis in the subcohort of patients receiving novel agents (proteasome inhibitors and/or IMiDs) as first-line regimen. Results. Among 4,670 patients with median age 76 years (50% women), 51% received BMA (83% zoledronate, 16% pamidronate, 1% denosumab) within 90 days of the start of chemotherapy. Median number of BMA doses was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-6) within 6 months, and 9 (IQR, 5-11) with 12 months from the start of chemotherapy. In a multivariable model (Table), omission of BMA was significantly more frequent (by 11-16%) among patients aged ≥80 compared with those aged <70. It also increased with the number of comorbidities, was 17% more likely among patients with chronic kidney disease, and 16% more likely in hospital-based facilities compared with physician offices. Omission of BMA was significantly less likely in patients with prior SRE (by 30%), hypercalcemia (by 25%), or use of radiation (by 30%). It was also less likely in patients treated with the combination of bortezomib and IMiD compared with other regimens. BMA use was not significantly associated with sex, race, socioeconomic or performance status, or prior use of oral bisphosphonates. We observed a weak (16.5%) intraclass correlation by treating physician. Median follow-up from start of chemotherapy was 4.6 years. SRE occurred in 729 patients, with a 3-year CIF of 13.6% (95% CI, 12.2-15.0). BMA use was associated with a lower risk of SRE in the entire analytic cohort (adjusted SHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.98), and in the propensity score-matched subcohort (N=3,152; SHR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.94, Fig. A). Estimated 3-year CIF of SRE was 11.2% with BMA and 14.1% without BMA. Median OS in the entire cohort was 3.1 years (95% CI, 2.9-3.2). Receipt of BMA was associated with better OS (adjusted HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92). Survival did not significantly differ between different BMAs (P=.73). Significantly better OS among patients receiving BMA was also observed in the propensity-score matched subcohort (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97; Fig. B), and in the subgroup treated with novel agents (adjusted HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.96). Conclusions. Despite guidelines and benefit demonstrated in clinical trials, only about half of Medicare patients actively treated for myeloma receive the recommended BMA. In this large population-based sample, using a causal inference method, we confirmed the association between the BMA use, risk of SRE, and OS. Clinicians should strive to consistently provide BMA as an important component of quality care for myeloma. Further research should address barriers to BMA use in clinical practice. Disclosures Olszewski: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Reagan:Takeda Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4645-4645
Author(s):  
Avinash G Dinmohamed ◽  
Mirian Brink ◽  
Otto Visser ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Arjan A van de Loosdrecht ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare hematological malignancy with features of both myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Most data on CMML arrive from the few available clinical and epidemiological studies where CMML was often combined with MDS. So far, phase 3 clinical trials and large population-based studies specifically addressing CMML are lacking. We conducted a large nationwide population-based study to assess trends in incidence, primary treatment and survival among CMML patients in the Netherlands from 1989-2012. Methods We selected all patients diagnosed with CMML in 1989-2012 (N = 1,359; median age 75 years; age range 22-95 years; 63% males) from the nationwide population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Patients with juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia were excluded. Despite changes in classification, separate morphology codes for CMML were available in all editions of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O; 9893, 9868 and 9945 in the first, second and third edition, respectively) and could therefore be identified in the NCR throughout the whole study period. The ICD-O does not have separate codes for CMML-1 or 2. Data on primary treatment, that is, no therapy or only supportive care (NT/SC), chemotherapy (CT) and CT followed by a stem cell transplantation (CT + SCT), were retrieved from the NCR. Patients were categorized into three calendar periods (1989-2000, 2001-2006 and 2007-2012) and four age groups (18-59, 60-69, 70-79 and ≥80 years), unless otherwise stated. Incidence rates were age-standardized to the European standard population and calculated per 100,000 person-years. Relative survival rates (RSRs) were computed as a measure of disease-specific survival. Results The overall age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) of CMML increased from 0.23 per 100,000 in 1989-2000, 0.31 in 2001-2006 to 0.38 in 2007-2012. The annual ASR became stable at around 0.4 per 100,000 since 2008 (Fig 1A). The proportion of patients diagnosed in individuals aged ≥70 years was 70%. The incidence of CMML was higher in men than in women, which was ascribed to the higher incidence among the 70-year-old men compared with the equivalent female group (Fig 1B). The primary treatment of CMML patients remained unchanged during the entire study period. In the overall series, 975 (72%), 365 (27%) and 19 (1%) CMML patients received NT/SC, CT and CT + SCT, respectively. The use of CT + SCT was mainly restricted to patients 18-59 (n = 13) and 60-69 (n = 6) years of age. Survival of CMML patients was poor and did not improve over time as the 5-year RSRs (with 95% confidence interval) were 16% (12%-20%), 20% (15%-25%) and 20% (15%-25%) in the three calendar periods, respectively. As shown in Figure 2, the overall 5-year RSRs for patients in the four age groups were 21% (13%-29%), 23% (18%-29%), 20% (16%-24%) and 12% (7%-18%), respectively. With the limitation of small numbers (n = 19), the overall 5- and 10-year RSRs were 29% (10%-52%) and 30% (10%-53%) for patients undergoing CT + SCT as primary treatment. In other words, the RSR reached a plateau after 5 years since diagnosis. In the most recent period, the 5-year RSR was 73% (25%-95%) for patients undergoing CT + SCT (n = 7). Conclusions In this first large population-based study including almost 1400 CMML patients, we found that the incidence of CMML increased over time until the year 2007. This rise is probably explained by improved case ascertainment and augmented disease awareness, rather than by changes in etiologic factors. Primary treatment remained conservative throughout the study period as treatment options for CMML, which primarily affects the elderly, are very limited. As a consequence, relative survival remained poor and essentially unchanged in both younger and older patients over the past two decades. Therefore, CMML-specific prognostic models should be applied in the diagnostic work-up to evaluate prognosis and plan risk-adapted treatment, and assist in designing clinical trials that specifically assess therapeutic options in CMML patients in order to improve their survival. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-Rong Li ◽  
Pei-Liang Chen ◽  
Xin Cheng ◽  
Hai-Lian Yang ◽  
Wen-Fang Zhong ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ota Fuchs

Thalidomide and its derivatives (lenalidomide, pomalidomide, avadomide, iberdomide hydrochoride, CC-885 and CC-90009) form the family of immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Lenalidomide (CC5013, Revlimid®) was approved by the US FDA and the EMA for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, low or intermediate-1 risk transfusion-dependent myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with chromosome 5q deletion [del(5q)] and relapsed and/or refractory mantle cell lymphoma following bortezomib. Lenalidomide has also been studied in clinical trials and has shown promising activity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Lenalidomide has anti-inflammatory effects and inhibits angiogenesis. Pomalidomide (CC4047, Imnovid® [EU], Pomalyst® [USA]) was approved for advanced MM insensitive to bortezomib and lenalidomide. Other IMiDs are in phases 1 and 2 of clinical trials. Cereblon (CRBN) seems to have an important role in IMiDs action in both lymphoid and myeloid hematological malignancies. Cereblon acts as the substrate receptor of a cullin-4 really interesting new gene (RING) E3 ubiquitin ligase CRL4CRBN. This E3 ubiquitin ligase in the absence of lenalidomide ubiquitinates CRBN itself and the other components of CRL4CRBN complex. Presence of lenalidomide changes specificity of CRL4CRBN which ubiquitinates two transcription factors, IKZF1 (Ikaros) and IKZF3 (Aiolos), and casein kinase 1α (CK1α) and marks them for degradation in proteasomes. Both these transcription factors (IKZF1 and IKZF3) stimulate proliferation of MM cells and inhibit T cells. Low CRBN level was connected with insensitivity of MM cells to lenalidomide. Lenalidomide decreases expression of protein argonaute-2, which binds to cereblon. Argonaute-2 seems to be an important drug target against IMiDs resistance in MM cells. Lenalidomide decreases also basigin and monocarboxylate transporter 1 in MM cells. MM cells with low expression of Ikaros, Aiolos and basigin are more sensitive to lenalidomide treatment. The CK1α gene (CSNK1A1) is located on 5q32 in commonly deleted region (CDR) in del(5q) MDS. Inhibition of CK1α sensitizes del(5q) MDS cells to lenalidomide. CK1α mediates also survival of malignant plasma cells in MM. Though, inhibition of CK1α is a potential novel therapy not only in del(5q) MDS but also in MM. High level of full length CRBN mRNA in mononuclear cells of bone marrow and of peripheral blood seems to be necessary for successful therapy of del(5q) MDS with lenalidomide. While transfusion independence (TI) after lenalidomide treatment is more than 60% in MDS patients with del(5q), only 25% TI and substantially shorter duration of response with occurrence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were achieved in lower risk MDS patients with normal karyotype treated with lenalidomide. Shortage of the biomarkers for lenalidomide response in these MDS patients is the main problem up to now.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Charles Kassardjian ◽  
Jessica Widdifield ◽  
J. Michael Paterson ◽  
Alexander Kopp ◽  
Chenthila Nagamuthu ◽  
...  

Background: Prednisone is a common treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG), and osteoporosis is a known potential risk of chronic prednisone therapy. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the risk of serious fractures in a population-based cohort of MG patients. Methods: An inception cohort of patients with MG was identified from administrative health data in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2002 and December 31, 2015. For each MG patient, we matched 4 general population comparators based on age, sex, and region of residence. Fractures were identified through emergency department and hospitalization data. Crude overall rates and sex-specific rates of fractures were calculated for the MG and comparator groups, as well as rates of specific fractures. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox regression. Results: Among 3,823 incident MG patients (followed for a mean of 5 years), 188 (4.9%) experienced a fracture compared with 741 (4.8%) fractures amongst 15,292 matched comparators. Crude fracture rates were not different between the MG cohort and matched comparators (8.71 vs. 7.98 per 1000 patient years), overall and in men and women separately. After controlling for multiple covariates, MG patients had a significantly lower risk of fracture than comparators (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63–0.88). Conclusions: In this large, population-based cohort of incident MG patients, MG patients were at lower risk of a major fracture than comparators. The reasons for this finding are unclear but may highlight the importance osteoporosis prevention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document