scholarly journals Five-year follow-up of brentuximab vedotin combined with ABVD or AVD for advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (11) ◽  
pp. 1375-1377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
Stephen M. Ansell ◽  
Michelle Fanale ◽  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Anas Younes
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma: Long Term Outcomes

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 292-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph M Connors ◽  
Stephen Ansell ◽  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Michelle A. Fanale ◽  
Anas Younes
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Genetics Research

Background: The ABVD regimen containing doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine is a common standard of care for the frontline treatment of advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma (Santoro 1987; Duggan 2003) and is curative for the majority of patients; however, up to 30% of patients require a secondary therapy. Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg cells of classical HL (cHL) typically express CD30. In a pivotal phase 2 trial brentuximab vedotin (A, ADCETRIS®), comprised of an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody conjugated by a protease-cleavable linker to a microtubule-disrupting agent, monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) induced an objective response rate (ORR) of 75% and complete response rate (CR) of 34% in highly treatment-refractory patients with cHL (Younes 2012). Methods: We conducted a phase 1, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A when administered in combination with standard therapy (ABVD) or the same regimen without bleomycin (AVD) (Younes 2013). Adult patients with newly diagnosed advanced stage (II bulky, II B, III or IV; 80% stage III or IV) received doses of 0.6, 0.9, or 1.2 mg/kg A with standard doses of ABVD or 1.2 mg/kg with AVD, depending on cohort assignment on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles of therapy. Previously we reported that among patients assessable for response 95% of patients given ABVD+A achieved a CR, as did 96% of patients given AVD+A. None of 26 patients given AVD+A but 11 of 25 (44%) given ABVD+A experienced pulmonary toxicity, including 2 deaths, establishing that A cannot be safely combined with bleomycin. In this current study we provide the long term survival and safety data on patients enrolled in the phase 1 trial. Results: In total 51 patients were assigned to either ABVD+A (n=25) or AVD+A (n=26). 1 patient who withdrew from the trial during the first cycle of ABVD+A is excluded from this analysis and 1 patient who received 3 cycles of ABVD+A, then withdrew, then received 3 cycles of ABVD alone and 2 patients who died during treatment (pulmonary toxicity) are included (total n=50). Median follow-up from diagnosis for the 24 patients treated with ABVD+A is 41 months (range 9-51 months) and for the 26 patients treated with AVD+A, 31 months (range 9-35 months). All 26 patients treated with AVD+A have been followed longer than the longest time to relapse (7 months). 45 patients remain in first CR and 5 treatment failures have occurred: 4 in the ABVD+A cohort (2 toxic deaths; 2 relapses (9 and 23 months from diagnosis)) and 1 after AVD+A (7 months from diagnosis). 3y-failure-free survival (3y-FFS) is 83% and 96% for ABVD+A and AVD+A, respectively, and 3y-overall survival (3y-OS), is 92% and 100%. No additional toxic deaths have occurred in follow-up. Conclusions: These updated outcomes reflecting the impact of adding brentuximab vedotin (1.2 mg/kg) to standard doses of AVD for classical Hodgkin lymphoma, demonstrating 96% 3y-FFS and 100% 3y-OS with no major unexpected toxicity, strongly support the current large international trial comparing AVD-A (AVD+1.2mg/kg brentuximab vedotin) to standard ABVD (ECHELON-1, clinicaltrials.gov NCT01712490), which may identify a new, less toxic gold standard treatment for advanced stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Disclosures Connors: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Off Label Use: brentuximab vedotin in phase 1 trial. Ansell:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Park:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding. Fanale:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Younes:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with radiotherapy as salvage treatment for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A retrospective analysis in 12 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Lucchini ◽  
Chiara Rusconi ◽  
Mario Levis ◽  
Francesca Ricci ◽  
Armando Santoro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Highly Active

The rate of complete remission (CR) with the anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) nivolumab (N) and pembrolizumab (P) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is low (20-30%), and the majority of patients eventually relapse. One strategy to improve their outcome is to combine ICI with radiotherapy (ICI-RT), taking advantage of a supposed synergistic effect. We retrospectively collected data of 12 adult patients with R/R cHL treated with ICI-RT delivered during or within 8 weeks from the start or after the end of ICI. Median age at ICI-RT was 37 years, 50% had previously received an autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) and 92% brentuximab vedotin. RT was given concurrently, before or after ICI in 4, 1 and 7 patients. Median RT dose was 30Gy, for a median duration of 22 days. Median number of ICI administrations was 15. Overall response and CR rate were 100% and 58%. Nine patients received subsequent SCT consolidation (7 allogeneic and 2 autologous). After a median follow-up of 18 months, 92% of patients were in CR. No major concerns about safety were reported. ICI-RT combination appears to be a feasible and highly active bridge treatment to transplant consolidation.

scholarly journals Update on the role of brentuximab vedotin in classical Hodgkin lymphoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 261-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Tomassetti ◽  
Alex F. Herrera
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Fda

Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). It was initially approved by the US FDA for the treatment of HL after failure of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (autoHSCT) or after failure of at least two prior lines of multiagent chemotherapy in patients who are not transplant candidates, and then subsequently, as consolidation therapy after autoHSCT in patients who are at high risk for relapse. However, the role of BV in the treatment of HL is evolving. BV has shown promising efficacy as a salvage treatment in the second-line setting prior to autoHSCT. Most recently, the ECHELON-1 trial demonstrated that BV combined with AVD for the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced stage HL improved modified progression-free survival (mPFS) compared with standard ABVD. Based on these results, the US FDA has approved BV as part of the initial treatment of advanced stage HL. With the approval of BV as front-line therapy, depending on how widely the use of BV plus AVD is adopted, the role of BV in the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) HL may need to be redefined. BV retreatment can be effective, and studies of rational BV-based combination regimens may help to improve response rates and overcome BV resistance. Furthermore, BV has been demonstrated to be effective in the initial treatment of elderly or unfit patients, and ongoing studies are evaluating the addition of BV to initial chemotherapy in patients with early stage HL.

scholarly journals Cause-Specific Mortality Following Initial Chemotherapy in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2000-2016

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (35) ◽  
pp. 4149-4162
Author(s):  
Graça M. Dores ◽  
Rochelle E. Curtis ◽  
Nicole H. Dalal ◽  
Martha S. Linet ◽  
Lindsay M. Morton
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
The United States ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratios

PURPOSE Mortality for patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) treated during an era characterized in the United States by widespread use of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine and diminishing use of radiotherapy is not well understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified 20,007 individuals diagnosed with stage I/II (early) or III/IV (advanced) cHL between age 20 and 74 years treated with initial chemotherapy in US population-based cancer registries during 2000-2015 (follow-up through 2016). We used standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) to compare cause-specific relative mortality risk following cHL to that expected in the general population and estimated excess absolute risks (EARs; per 10,000 patient-years) to quantify disease-specific death burden. RESULTS We identified 3,380 deaths in the cHL cohort, including 1,321 (39%) not attributed to lymphoma. Overall, noncancer SMRs were increased 2.4-fold (95% CI, 2.2 to 2.6; observed, 559; EAR, 61.6) and 1.6-fold (95% CI, 1.4 to 1.7; observed, 473; EAR, 18.2) for advanced- and early-stage cHL, respectively, compared with the general US population. SMRs and EARs differed substantially by cause of death and cHL stage. Among the highest EARs for noncancer causes of death were those for heart disease (EAR, 15.1; SMR, 2.1), infections (EAR, 10.6; SMR, 3.9), interstitial lung disease (ILD; EAR, 9.7; SMR, 22.1), and adverse events (AEs) related to medications/drugs (EAR, 7.4; SMR, 5.0) after advanced-stage cHL and heart disease (EAR, 6.6; SMR, 1.7), ILD (EAR, 3.7; SMR, 13.1), and infections (EAR, 3.1; SMR, 2.2) after early-stage cHL. Strikingly elevated SMRs for ILD, infections, and AEs were observed < 1 year after cHL. Individuals age 60-74 years with advanced-stage cHL experienced a disproportionate excess of deaths as a result of heart disease, ILD, infections, AEs, and solid tumors. CONCLUSION Despite evolving cHL treatment approaches, patients continue to face increased nonlymphoma mortality risks from multiple, potentially preventable causes. Surveillance, early interventions, and cHL treatment refinements may favorably affect patient longevity, particularly among high-risk subgroups.

NIVOLUMAB PLUS DOXORUBICIN, VINBLASTINE AND DACARBAZINE FOR NEWLY DIAGNOSED ADVANCED-STAGE CLASSICAL HODGKIN LYMPHOMA: CHECKMATE 205 COHORT D 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 146-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ansell ◽  
R. Ramchandren ◽  
E. Domingo-Domènech ◽  
A. Rueda ◽  
M. Trněný ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

scholarly journals Real-world efficacy of brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine as a bridge to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in primary refractory or relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 2385-2392
Author(s):  
László Imre Pinczés ◽  
Roxána Szabó ◽  
Árpád Illés ◽  
Dóra Földeák ◽  
Klára Piukovics ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Real World ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

Abstract Up to 30% of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are not responsive to frontline therapy or relapse after primary treatment. In these cases, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is the standard of care. The combination of brentuximab vedotin and bendamustine (BV + B) is an effective salvage regimen in this challenging subpopulation. This nationwide multicenter study investigated the real-world efficacy and safety of the BV + B regimen as a bridge to AHSCT in patients with primary refractory or relapsed cHL. A total of 41 cHL patients underwent AHSCT after receiving at least 1 cycle of BV + B (with brentuximab vedotin given at 1.8 mg/kg on day 1 and bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 on days 1–2 every 4 weeks). After a median of 3 (1–6) cycles of BV + B, the objective response rate was 78%, with 29 (70.7%) patients achieving complete remission. Twelve (29.3%) patients relapsed after AHSCT, 2 (4.9%) of them died, while 2 (4.9%) patients are lost to follow-up. After a median of 17 months of follow-up, the estimated 2-year overall- and progression-free survival after AHSCT was 93 and 62%, respectively. Features of advanced disease at recurrence (p = 0.038) and the presence of stage IV cHL at relapse (p = 0.024) are strong predictor markers of unfavorable outcomes. Twenty-four (58.5%) patients experienced adverse events of any grade, while no grade IV toxicities were reported. BV + B is an effective salvage option with a manageable toxicity profile in cHL. The real-world safety and efficacy of this combination are similar to the observations made on the study population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document