scholarly journals Association between the Risk of Low/High-Count Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL) and the Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Polygenic Risk Score (PRS)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5538-5538
Author(s):  
Geffen Kleinstern ◽  
Sara J. Achenbach ◽  
Dennis P. Robinson ◽  
Aaron D. Norman ◽  
Kari G. Chaffee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Polygenic Risk Score ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
High Count ◽  
Polygenic Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Age And Sex

Abstract Background MBL is a precursor state to CLL, with a prevalence of ~5-8% in the general population and 15-18% in CLL families. To date, 41 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been found to be associated with CLL. We previously showed that a PRS of the weighted average of the number of risk alleles of these SNPs is associated with CLL risk using cases and controls from the International Lymphoma Epidemiology (InterLymph) Consortium. We validated this score in an independent sample of CLL cases and controls from the Genetic Epidemiology of CLL (GEC) Consortium, a cohort of families with ≥2 members with CLL. In the CLL families we also reported an association between the PRS and MBL risk, where 93% of MBLs were low-count MBL. Here we evaluate the PRS in an independent sample ascertained from the Mayo Clinic Biobank. Methods The Mayo Clinic Biobank is a large-scale bio-repository of adult patients assembled to provide a wide array of health-related research studies. Biobank participants (N=2530) were screened for MBL using a highly-sensitive, 8-color (CD38, CD45, Kappa, Lambda, CD19, CD23, CD5 and CD20) flow-cytometry assay on stored cryopreserved peripheral blood mononucleotide cells. Low-count and high-count MBL were defined as those individuals who had <85% and ≥85 clonal B-cells out of total B-cells, respectively. Individuals without MBL ("controls") were frequency matched to MBLs based on age and sex, after excluding non-Caucasian and non-interpretable flow results. Participants were genotyped using the Illumina OmniExpress array. Standard genotyping quality-control metrics were applied. We computed the PRS as previously published and categorized it by quintiles based on values previously used with InterLymph controls. The middle quintile served as the reference category. We used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age at consent, sex, and socioeconomic status. In addition, we compared the median PRS by low-count MBL and high count MBL using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results We identified 276 MBLs overall and 2109 controls; 97% (N=267) of MBLs had low-count MBL and only 3% (N=9) had high-count MBL. We then selected 844 controls frequency matched to the MBL cases on age and sex. Family history of leukemia/lymphoma was 11.3% among MBLs overall and 8.8% among controls. The median PRS was 7.88 and 7.46 (Figure) among MBLs overall and controls, respectively. The continuous PRS had a 1.75-fold increased risk for MBL overall (CI:1.5-2.1, P=2.65x10-12). Compared to the middle quintile, the highest quintile had 2.2-fold increased risk for MBL overall (CI:1.5-3.3, P=1.46x10-4) and the lowest quintile had 0.6-fold decreased risk (CI:0.4-0.96, P=0.03). The median PRS for low-count and high count MBL were 7.86 and 8.04, respectively. The continuous PRS had a 1.75-fold increased risk for low-count MBL (CI:1.5-2.1, P=4.81x10-12) and a 1.89-fold increased risk for high-count MBL (CI:0.8-4.2, P=0.13), however, the effect is not statistically significant between high-count and low-count MBL (P=0.89). Conclusion In this independent sample, we validated our previous findings that the CLL PRS is associated with MBL risk. Although the sample size of high-count MBL was limited (N=9), there is evidence of a weak trend towards a higher PRS compared to low-count MBL and controls Larger sample size of high-count MBL is warranted in order to stratify MBL risk by low-count and high-count MBL. These results may help identify individuals at higher risk of MBL including low-count and high-count MBL, beyond the risk associated with age and family history of CLL. Figure: Polygenic risk score distribution by control and MBL status Figure. Figure. Disclosures Parikh: Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding. Cerhan:Nanostring: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Jannsen: Other: Scientific Advisory Board. Kay:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acerta: Research Funding; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cytomx Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shanafelt:Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Jansen: Research Funding.

Appropriateness of Thrombophilia Testing in Tertiary Care Centers in Edmonton

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4470-4470
Author(s):  
Alabdurubalnabi Zainab ◽  
Salma Shivji ◽  
Cynthia Wu
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Thrombophilia Testing

Abstract INTRODUCTION Thrombophilia is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Despite this link, determining the presence or absence of such conditions has no role in VTE management including determining the choice or duration of anticoagulant therapy. Testing can be potentially harmful when results are misinterpreted or impact patient anxiety and insurance eligibility. METHODS We performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) or were admitted to the University of Alberta Hospital (UAH), Royal Alexandra Hospital (RAH) and Grey Nuns Hospital (GNH) and underwent any number of thrombophilia tests (including factor V Leiden [FVL], prothrombin gene mutation [PT20210], protein C [PC], protein S [PS], antithrombin [AT] and antiphospholipid antibody testing). To assess for appropriateness of testing, categories of data were collected including presence of other strong risk factors obviating the need to look for other causes, indicators for higher yield (age of patient, presence of family history of VTE, idiopathic nature of VTE), presence of factors that confound testing (such as therapeutic anticoagulation) and relevant follow up (appropriate repeat testing when necessary). We also collected basic patient demographics, VTE details and ordering physician/service details to evaluate under what circumstances testing may be ordered more frequently. RESULTS 134 charts of patients tested for thrombophilia were reviewed between 2007-2013 at UAH and RAH Hospitals. A total of 965 thrombophilia tests were done (see analysis table). 13.4% of the testing was ordered by hematologists, 23.1% by neurologists, 52.2% by other internists. Overall, all patients had tests performed inappropriately, lacked appropriate follow up or had uninterpretable results and none had documented counseling prior to thrombophilia testing. CONCLUSIONS Thrombophilia testing is frequently ordered inappropriately and not adequately followed up. Strategies to educate physicians on indications and limitations of testing are warranted. These strategies can help decrease over/under/misinterpretation of thrombophilia testing as well as result in significant savings to the health care system if testing can be reduced. Table 1. Demographics Sample Size Males Females Total 74 (55.22%) 60 (44.78%) 134 (100%) Age at time of testing (Yrs) Range 19-88 Average 48.7 Patients' Test Results Test Times Performed Abnormal Results APCR 134 (100%) 32 (23.8%) FVL genetic test 58 (43%) 21 (39%) PT20210 105 (77%) 4 (3.8%) Protein C 100 (74.1%) 8 (8%) Protein S 99 (73.3%) 16 (16.2%) AT levels 99 (73.3%) 19 (19.2%) Anticardiolipin Ab 117 (86.7%) 4 (3.4%) Lupus Anticoagulant 109 (81.3%) 10 (10.2%) Provoking Factors Patients with One or More Provoking Factors Major 10 7.4% Moderate 74 56% Minor 29 21.8% No Provoking Factors 49 36.8% Family History of VTE 12 8.9% Protein C and Protein S Testing Done During Acute VTE 64 64% Patient was on Warfarin 25 25% Number of Abnormal Test Results 24 16% Number of Repeated Abnormal Tests 0 0% AT Testing Total Tests Performed 99 73.3% Done During Acute VTE 62 63% Patient was on Therap. Heparin or LMWH 62 62.6% Number of Abnormal Test Results 19 19.2% Abnormal Tests Repeated? 7 37% Repeat Tests Showing Normal Results 3 57% APA Testing Tests were Repeated After 12 Weeks for Confirmation 11% Disclosures Wu: Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Crizanlizumab 5.0 Mg/Kg Exhibits a Favorable Safety Profile in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: Pooled Data from Two Phase II Studies

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 991-991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Kanter ◽  
Darla K Liles ◽  
Kim Smith-Whitley ◽  
Clark Brown ◽  
Abdullah Kutlar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Favorable Safety

Background: Crizanlizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds P-selectin and blocks interaction with its ligands (including leukocyte PSGL-1), is under investigation for preventing vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg was shown to significantly reduce the median annual rate of VOCs by 45.3% versus placebo (Hodges-Lehmann median absolute difference of -1.01 vs placebo, 95% CI [-2.00, 0.00]; P=0.01) (Ataga et al. N Engl J Med 2017). Aims: This pooled analysis evaluated key safety endpoints in patients treated with the recommended dose of crizanlizumab (5.0 mg/kg monthly, following 2 loading doses in the first month). Methods: Data were pooled from 2 Phase II studies of SCD patients (any genotype) with a history of VOCs leading to a healthcare visit. SUSTAIN (NCT01895361) was a randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients aged 16-65 years who had experienced 2-10 VOCs in the previous 12 months. SOLACE-adults (A2202) is an ongoing, open-label PK/PD study (NCT03264989) in patients aged 16-70 years who had experienced at least 1 VOC in the previous 12 months; data cut-off for this analysis was 1 March 2019. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated based on MedDRA v21.1. AE severity in SOLACE was assessed based on CTCAE v5; in SUSTAIN, severity was collected as mild/moderate/severe but then recategorized for this analysis to a 5-point scale similar to CTCAE grading. AEs of special interest (ie known class effects; AEs identified preclinically or in previous studies; or potentially relevant based on the mechanism of action of crizanlizumab) were also evaluated and included infections, infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and hemostatic effects. As monoclonal antibodies can induce an immune response, anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) were also measured. Results: In total, 111 patients (SUSTAIN, n=66; SOLACE, n=45) received crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg: 59 females (53.2%) and 52 males (46.8%). Median age was 29 years (range 16-65). The most common SCD genotypes were HbSS (n=73; 65.8%) and HbSC (n=19; 17.1%), and 75 patients (67.6%) were receiving hydroxyurea (HU). Most patients (n=67; 60.4%) had 1-4 VOCs in the previous 12 months. Median duration of exposure to crizanlizumab was 46 weeks (range 4-58). At least 1 AE was reported in 94 patients (84.7%), the most common (≥15%) being headache (n=22; 19.8%), nausea (n=18; 16.2%) and back pain (n=17; 15.3%). AEs were mild/moderate (grade 1 or 2) and resolved spontaneously in most patients; 23 patients (20.7%) had a grade 3 AE and 1 (0.9%) had a grade 4 AE (neoplasm). At least 1 serious AE was reported in 24 patients (21.6%); serious AEs with a suspected relationship to crizanlizumab were reported in 6 patients (5.4%). Twenty-eight patients (25.2%) discontinued treatment prematurely (n=23 in SUSTAIN, n=5 to date in SOLACE): discontinuations due to AEs (bradycardia and breast cancer) occurred in 2 patients (1.8%); neither was considered related to crizanlizumab. There were 2 on-treatment deaths in SUSTAIN, but neither were considered related to crizanlizumab. Infection events were reported in 51 patients (45.9%), the most common (≥5%) being upper respiratory tract infection (n=13, 11.7%) and urinary tract infection (n=11, 9.9%). There were no grade 4 infections and none led to discontinuation. Data suggest no increased risk or severity of infection in studies with crizanlizumab. Two patients (1.8%) experienced IRRs; the events were not serious and did not lead to discontinuation. Bleeding events were rare, with most observed hemostatic AEs being abnormal laboratory parameters occurring only once. Treatment-induced ADAs were transiently detected in 1 patient (0.9%) and spontaneously resolved. There were no clinically relevant laboratory (hematology, biochemistry, liver) or ECG abnormalities, or vital sign changes, and no notable differences in the AE incidence rates by gender, ethnicity or HU use. Conclusions: This pooled analysis shows that crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg was well tolerated, with a favorable safety profile, in patients with SCD and a history of VOCs. Most AEs were mild/moderate, and discontinuations due to AEs were infrequent. The immunogenic potential of crizanlizumab appears low and there is currently no evidence for an increased risk of infection or bleeding. SOLACE-adults and SOLACE-kids (6 months to &lt;18 years) are ongoing, and the randomized Phase III STAND trial is recruiting. Disclosures Kanter: bluebird bio, Inc.: Consultancy; SCDAA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHLBI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rockpointe: Honoraria; Peerview: Honoraria; Jeffries: Consultancy; Medscape: Honoraria; GLG: Consultancy; Cowen: Consultancy; Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; Sangamo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Modus: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Imara: Consultancy. Liles:Novartis: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Shire: Other: PI on clinical trial Sickle cell ; Imara: Other: PI on Clinical trial- Sickle cell . Brown:Novartis, Inc: Research Funding. Kutlar:Bluebird Bio: Other: DSMB Member; Micelle Biopharma: Other: DSMB Chair; Novartis: Consultancy; Global Blood Therapeutics, Inc. (GBT): Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding. Elliott:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Other: Shareholder. Lincy:NOVARTIS PHARMA AG: Employment. Poggio:Novartis: Employment. Ataga:Advisory Board: Global Blood Therapeutics, Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: VINDICO WILL FORWARD DISCLOSURES ONCE RECEIVED AND SIGNED NOT RECEIVED TO DATE; VINDICO WILL FORWARD DISCLOSURES ONCE RECEIVED AND SIGNED NOT RECEIVED TO DATE: Other: VINDICO WILL FORWARD DISCLOSURES ONCE RECEIVED AND SIGNED NOT RECEIVED TO DATE; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emmaus Life Sciences: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

A Survey of the Etiology of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2239-2239
Author(s):  
Valerie Arias ◽  
Ehsan Shabbir ◽  
Daniel Victorio ◽  
Emily Sperling ◽  
Naznin Haq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Family History ◽  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Deficiency Anemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Formal Statistical Analysis ◽  
History Of

Abstract Abstract 2239 Introduction: Socioeconomic, environmental, lifestyle and genetic factors play a role in the etiology of ITP but are poorly understood. A self-reported questionnaire was designed to study these relationships and how these factors prior to the diagnosis of ITP relate to treatment response and disease progression in order to gain insight into the etiology of ITP. Methods: To design the questionnaire that would address topics of interest: 1) 60 ITP patient interviews were performed and 2) the questionnaire was reviewed by project coordinators, nurse practitioners, Platelet Disorder Support Association (PDSA) members, and hematologists. The input was incorporated into a further-revised questionnaire, which was then administered to both “pediatric” (patients <18 years of age at the time of diagnosis) and adult ITP patients from the Platelet Disorders Center at Weill Cornell - New York Presbyterian Hospital. Formal statistical analysis to relate responses to one question to responses of another to define sub-groups of patients is ongoing. Results: 109 patients were enrolled. Ages ranged from 2–78 years of age; median age was 55 years, with 21 females and 33 “pediatric” patients. The most frequent environmental exposures in adults were automotive exhaust (n=14) and Teflon (n=12). In pediatrics, preservatives and insecticides (n=8) and Teflon (n=7) were most common. The most prevalent hazardous substances in both groups were cleaning supplies (n=16 adults, n=9 “pediatric”) and chlorinated water (n=13 adult, n=9 “pediatric”). 13 adults also had exposure to gasoline or diesel fumes. Refer to figure 1. 51(47%) patients reported at least one infection prior to diagnosis with ITP. The most common were Strep throat (n=12); influenza (n=9), and respiratory tract infections (n=8). Twenty-four (22%) patients reported at least one autoimmune disease, including celiac (n=2) and discoid lupus (n=2).Twenty-one patients reported a family history of Type II diabetes, 12 Type I diabetes, 13 osteoarthritis and 10 rheumatoid arthritis. Eight (7%) patients reported at least one inflammatory disease including: Crohn's disease (n=3), Inflammatory bowel disease (n=7), Systemic lupus erythematous and Vitiligo(each n=1). Thirty-seven (34%) patients reported surgeries prior to diagnosis of ITP, especially: appendectomy (n=8) and tonsil removal (n=8). Twenty-three patients traveled close to date of diagnosis, 58 patients reported more stress than usual (i.e. death of a relative, loss of employment); 13 patients reported a drastic change in diet (i.e. decreasing calories (n=7) or becoming vegetarian (n=5)). Vitamin supplementation for vitamin C and D (each n=17), E (n=12) and B (n=11) were common. In addition, 11 vitamin deficiencies were reported, vitamin D (n=5), vitamin B12 (n=3) and other (n=3). The most frequent allergic reactions included: 31 (28%) patients with hay fever, 9 patients with allergies to milk, 7 patients with poison ivy or skin irritation, 6 patients with eczema, and 4 with allergic rhinitis. Other medical conditions reported were: hypothyroidism (n=10), hyperthyroidism (n=9), high blood pressure (N=16), high cholesterol (N=14), and anemia (N=13) [9 additional patients included 4 with iron deficiency anemia and 5 with a family history of iron deficiency anemia]. Seven patients reported a lack of prenatal care in their mothers' pregnancy and 7 were premature. Medications reported include: acetaminophen (n=53), antibiotics (n=36), antihistamines (n=22), and hormone therapy (n=17). Vaccinations received close to date of diagnosis include: flu vaccine (n=10) and T-dap (n=9). Prednisone was reported most frequently as both the best therapy to minimize symptoms (n=18) and the worst (n=16). Conclusion: Our pilot study intended to capture critical information and to further development of the questionnaire. We can see if there are groups of patients in whom onset and other characteristics relate to outcomes including response to treatment. Following formal statistical analysis of the material acquired (in progress and anticipated by early September), the next step will be for a final updated version of the questionnaire to be posted on the PDSA web site in order to accrue responses from a much larger number of patients. The questionnaire will also be given to a non-ITP patient population to serve as controls. Disclosures: Bussel: Amgen: Family owns Amgen stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cangene: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Family owns GSK stock, Family owns GSK stock Other, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; IgG of America: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Ligand: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sysmex: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy. Off Label Use: The use of romiplostim in pediatric patients was examined in this study.

Baseline Laboratory Parameters Potentially Associated with Thrombophilia in Patients with Chronic ITP.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2191-2191
Author(s):  
Raymond S.M. Wong ◽  
Kalpana Bakshi ◽  
Andres Brainsky
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Coagulation Cascade ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 2191 Background: The concept that chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP) may be pro-thrombotic has progressively gained acceptance as reports show an increased risk of thromboembolism (TEE) among cITP patients. A report from the Danish National Patient Registry showed an incidence of venous TEE of 5.32/1000 patient years (PYs) among cITP patients and 2.04/1000 PYs in a reference cohort (Severinsen 2010). Similar results were found in a US claims database study (Bennett 2008). ITP experts have gradually acknowledged this higher risk, but the reason for it is not understood. Many hematologic markers have been shown to be indicators of thrombophilia or activation of the clotting cascade (Jenkins 2012; De Stefano 2002; Tsai 2002); to our knowledge they have not been systematically and prospectively studied in cITP patients. Aim: Describe the frequency of potential laboratory predictors of thrombophilia in cITP. Methods: Adults with cITP were enrolled in an ongoing study to evaluate effects of eltrombopag on the bone marrow. A “thrombophilia panel” of suspected/known indicators of a thrombophilic state or activation of the coagulation cascade was collected at baseline. Patients could not have been treated with thrombopoietin receptor (TPO-R) agonists 6 months prior to enrollment. Patients with history of TEE and ≥2 risk factors for thrombosis were not eligible for enrollment. Results: Baseline thrombophilia panels were available for all 167 patients. Median age was 41 years; 108 (65%) patients were female. Approximately half of the patients were Caucasians (48.5%), while 31.1% and 19.2% had Central South and East Asian heritage. Median time since ITP diagnosis was 3.9 years (range, 0.2–45.7). Thirteen (8%) patients reported prior exposure to TPO-R agonists. Most patients (95%) had no family history of TEE and no patient had a history of TEE. Most patients (81%; Table 1) had abnormal levels of at least one well-known or suspected predictor of thrombosis or marker of activation of the coagulation cascade, and 93 (56%) had >1 abnormality. The most frequent abnormalities were elevated Factor VIII (48%), elevated d-dimer (32%), lupus anticoagulant (26%), and deficient protein S (22%; Table 2). Discussion: To our knowledge this is the only published prospective study of a thrombophilia profile in a cohort of cITP patients. Recently published data suggest that patients with cITP have a higher risk of TEE but no adequate explanation for this has been furnished. The fact that a high proportion of patients in this study had markers of thrombophilia or activation of clotting provides a working hypothesis that may at least partially elucidate this trait. Summary/conclusions: The multiple baseline abnormalities in possible predictors of thrombophilia may support the theory that ITP is pro-thrombotic, but they need to be assessed in and compared to the general population to allow proper understanding of their implications. The potential correlation of these abnormalities with TEE in this cohort will be reported upon study conclusion. Disclosures: Wong: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Biogen-Idec: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Bakshi:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brainsky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties.

Risk Factors for the Development of High-Titer Inhibitors in 260 Children with Severe Hemophilia a Born Between 1990 and 2009: The Remain Study

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3774-3774
Author(s):  
Maria Elisa Mancuso ◽  
Kathelijn Fischer ◽  
Elena Santagostino ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Helen Platokouki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
History Of

Abstract The development of anti-FVIII antibodies (i.e., inhibitors) is the major side effect of severe hemophilia A treatment. Inhibitors mainly develop in children during the first 50 exposure days and are classified in low-and high-titer (i.e., peak titer < or > 5 UB/ml). High-titer inhibitors have the major clinical impact. At diagnosis however, the real nature of the antibody is not clear in all patients, since some low-titer inhibitors may progress to high-titer. The determinants of the evolution from low- to high-titer inhibitors are still unclear and the aim of the present study was to investigate potential risk factors associated with the progression from low- to high-titer inhibitors. This study is a follow-up study of the PedNet Registry and includes 260 children with severe hemophilia A and clinically relevant inhibitors, born between 1990 and 2009 and consecutively recruited from 31 hemophilia centers in 16 countries. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the date of first positive inhibitor test and covered a minimum of 3-years follow-up. Factors potentially associated with progression from low- to high-titer inhibitor development were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. F8 mutation type was known in 247 patients (95%), including 202 (82%) null mutations (i.e., large deletions, nonsense mutations and inversions). Positive family history of inhibitors was present in 37 of 99 (37%) with positive family history of hemophilia. At diagnosis 49% (n=127) had low-titer inhibitors, however, upon FVIII re-exposure, 50% of low-titer inhibitors progressed to high-titer and only 25% of patients (n=69) had persistent low-titer inhibitors. Within the first 3 years of follow-up, immune tolerance induction (ITI) was equally implemented in around 80% of low-and high-titer patients but it was started later in children with high-titers (median time to ITI start 4.5 vs 0.3 months; p<0.001) in whom daily regimens and high-dose FVIII were more frequently adopted (89, 67% vs 41, 50% and 98, 74% vs 35, 43%; p=0.01 and <0.001, respectively). Overall high-titer inhibitor development was associated with null F8 mutations (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.4-5.5) and family history of inhibitors (OR 3.9, 95%CI 1.2-12.6). The progression from low- to high-titer inhibitors during follow up, was associated with the use of high-dose ITI regimens (i.e., >100 IU/kg/day) with an OR of 3.9 (95%CI 1.5-10.0), independent from the effects of F8 mutation type (adjusted OR 3.6, 95%CI 1.4-9.8) and family history of inhibitors (adjusted OR 6.7, 95%CI 1.1-42.6). No difference was found by comparing the use of daily versus non-daily ITI. In conclusion, in a cohort of 260 children with severe hemophilia A and inhibitors, 49% presented with low-titers at diagnosis and 46% of them progressed to high-titers during follow-up. Progression to high-titer inhibitors was associated with the use of high-dose ITI. These results suggest that intensive ITI should be avoided as initial strategy in low-titer inhibitor patients. Disclosures Mancuso: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sobi/Biogen Idec: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kedrion: Consultancy. Fischer:Wyeth/Pfizer: Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Baxter: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Freeline: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Santagostino:Octapharma: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Kedrion: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy; Biogen Idec: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Grifols: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Baxalta: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Escuriola:Baxalta, now part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Investigator Clinical Studies, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Liesner:BPL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cangene: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now a part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SOBI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria. Nolan:Sobi: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Thrombotic Events in Patients with PNH: A Nested Case-Control Study in the International PNH Registry

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Britta Hoechsmann ◽  
Regis Peffault De Latour ◽  
Anita Hill ◽  
Alexander Röth ◽  
Timothy Devos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Clone Size ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Control Study

INTRODUCTION Although thrombotic events (TEs) are the leading cause of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH)-related mortality, the risk factors predictive of TEs are not well established. Several small or previous studies reported that the proportion of PNH cells, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), age, thrombosis at diagnosis, and treatment may impact TE risk.1-5 The International PNH Registry (NCT01374360) is an observational cohort study containing the largest database of safety, quality-of-life, and outcome data from patients with PNH. Here, we analyzed patient data from the Registry to identify risk factors for TEs. METHODS Data from Registry patients who were untreated at enrollment, had an incident TE after enrollment, non-zero follow-up time, and with documented birthdate, sex, enrollment date, treatment status, and country, were included in this analysis. The first TEs experienced by eligible patients after enrollment were identified as TE cases; the date of the index TE event was defined as the Index Date. Up to five controls were selected from the risk set for each TE case matched on age (±5 years at Index Date), gender, country, and history of bone marrow disease (BMD). Cases that could not be matched with at least one control were excluded from the study. For covariates included in the analysis, conflicting or absent values were marked as "missing." Univariate conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% Wald confidence intervals (CIs) of TE associated with candidate risk factors: glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-deficient granulocytes, GPI-deficient erythrocytes, LDH ratio, recent high-disease activity (HDA; defined as within six months prior to the Index Date, LDH ratio ≥1.5xULN, and hemoglobin &lt;10 g/dL or at least one of the following symptoms: abdominal pain, dyspnea, dysphagia, fatigue, hemoglobinuria, and/or male erectile dysfunction), LDH ratio and number of HDA symptoms, history of TE, history of major adverse vascular event (MAVE), and recent prophylactic anticoagulant (PA) use. RESULTS Due to the strict eligibility criteria, 57 TE cases and 189 non-TE controls met the conditions and were matched for the case-control study. The mean age at Index Date was 46.8 years for TE cases and 47.1 years for non-TE control (Table A). Cases were more likely to have a clone size of ≥ 50% GPI-deficient granulocytes, an LDH ratio ≥ 1.5xULN, recent HDA, and a history of TE or MAVE, compared with controls. From univariate analyses, the following factors were found to be associated with statistically significantly increased risk of TE: recent HDA (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.10-6.61), LDH ≥1.5xULN and 2-3 HDA symptoms (OR, 8.61; 95% CI, 1.46-96.96), LDH ≥1.5xULN and ≥4 HDA symptoms (OR, 14.50; 95% CI, 1.70-209.25), and a history of TE (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.41-9.24) or MAVE (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 0.96-4.80), and recent PA use (OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.57-13.13) (Figure A). The strengths of this analysis include a robust study design for evaluation of a rare outcome and multiple risk factors, increased generalizability with an international patient population, and the ability to evaluate both medical history and recent clinical characteristics relevant to PNH and TE; however, not all patients had available data for each parameter assessed and the number of TE cases identified were relatively small. Despite these limitations, factors that were statistically significantly associated with increased TE risk were identified from the analysis. CONCLUSIONS Based on this observational PNH Registry analysis, we identified several clinical features of PNH that were associated with an elevated risk of TE, including ≥50% GPI-deficient granulocyte clone size, LDH ratios ≥1.5xULN, recent HDA, LDH ≥1.5xULN plus HDA symptoms, a history of TE or MAVE, and recent PA use compared with non-TE controls; for recent PA use, these patients were most likely at increased risk of TE, which may explain why they received treatment. Our data add to the findings of previously published studies1,4 by expanding the results to a broader patient population. These results highlight the importance and urgency of identifying and monitoring risk factors for TE in patients with PNH to inform treatment decisions. Disclosures Hoechsmann: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Peffault De Latour:Apellis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Hill:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment. Röth:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biocryst: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Devos:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patriquin:Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jain:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zu:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Ended employment in the past 24 months; Merck & Co.: Current Employment. Lee:Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Thirty-Three Patients with Myeloid Neoplasms and DDX41 Mutation: Mayo Clinic Experience

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3691-3691
Author(s):  
Ahmad Nanaa ◽  
Aref Al-Kali ◽  
David S. Viswanatha ◽  
James M. Foran ◽  
Talha Badar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Dead Box ◽  
History Of ◽  
Normal Cytogenetics

Abstract Background: The DEAD-box helicase 41 (DDX41), an RNA helicase, have been described as a component of the RNA spliceosome (Cheah et al. International Journal of Hematology 2017). Although DDX41 mutations predispose to late-onset higher grade myeloid neoplasms (MN), these patients may have a trend toward favorable prognosis and outcomes. In this work, we describe the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of isolated and co-mutated DDX41 patients (pts). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 4,524 consecutive pts who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) (OncoHeme 42 genes panel, Mayo Clinic) testing and included 32 pts harboring pathogenic DDX41 mutation and one pt with proven DDX41 germline variant of unknown significance (VUS). Chart review of DDX41-mutated (m) cases between 2009 and 2021 was conducted after IRB approval. We compared overall survival (OS) of unmatched 27 t(8;21)AML and 40 inv(16) AML pts with 10 m DDX41-AML pts. JMP® Pro 14.1.0 Software was used for statistical analysis. Results: DDX41 mutations characteristics: Our cohort included 19 (58%) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 10 (30%) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), 2 (6%) myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), one clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) (3%) and one (3%) germline carrier. Germline testing was carried out in 10 pts, 9 of whom (90%) were confirmed to be germline). The start-loss variant (p.M1I) was the most common mutation type (N=10, 31%). Other types were frameshift (N=9, 28%), missense mutation (N=8, 25%), nonsense (N=3, 9%), and splice site mutation (N=2, 2%). Twenty-one (65.6%) DDX41 mutations clustered in the N-terminus (NT), 7 (22%) in the helicase-C domain (HCD), and 4 (12.5%) in the DEAD-box domain. Compared to NT mutations, patients with HCD mutation had no family history of solid tumors and were more likely to have an accompanying additional DDX41-VUS (0% vs 70%; p=.001) and (N=6, 86% vs. N=2,10%; p=.0001); respectively. I solated vs. co-mutated DDX41: Twenty (60%) pts were isolated-DDX41 and 13 (40%) were co-mutated. The median DDX41-VAF was 48% vs. 45% (p= .2) in the isolated compared to the co-mutated cases, respectively. The median number of co-mutations in the 13 co-mutated cases was 1 (range,1-3) with DNMT3A (38%), ASXL1 (30%), JAK2 (N=3, 23%), and EZH2 (N=2, 15%) were the most common co-mutations detected. Isolated DDX41 had more males (85% vs. 54%, p=.05), the p.M1I variant (47% vs. 8%, p=.02), normal cytogenetics (100% vs. 91%, p= .02), and less family history of solid tumors (77% vs. 33%, p= .02) compared to their co-mutated counterparts. However, there was no difference in OS (p=.99). Comparison of clinical characteristics and hematological features of isolated and co-mutated DDX41 pts are reported in (Table 1). Treatment and survival outcomes in DDX41-MDS/AML : Twenty-three (80%) patients were treated, MDS pts received hypomethylating agents (HMA) (N=10, 71%), HMA plus Venetoclax (HMA+VEN) (N=1, 7%), erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (N=2, 14%) and lenalidomide (N=1 ,7%). AML pts were treated with induction chemotherapy (N=6, 67%) and HMA+VEN (N=3, 33%). Overall response rate of MDS/AML patients was 77% and 100% of AML pts achieved complete remission (CR) when treated with induction chemotherapy or HMA+VEN regimen. There was no significant difference in OS between responders vs. non-responders 2-yr-OS (90% vs. 50%; p=.38) and treated vs. untreated 2-yr-OS (83% vs. 100%; p=.52). Comparing m DDX41-AML vs. core binding factor-AML: After a median follow-up of 33.3 months, all m DDX41-AML patients were alive. There was a significantly better OS in mDDX41-AML patients compared to pts with t(8;21) AML with 2-yr-OS (100% vs. 51%; p=.024) and a trend of better survival when compared to inv(16) AML 2-yr-OS (100% vs. 84%; p=.2). Conclusion We describe the characteristics and outcomes of m DDX41 patients. We demonstrated that isolated and co-mutated m DDX41 patients have different features. Isolated DDX41 patients had male predominance, more p.M1I variant, normal cytogenetics and less family history of solid tumors. In this study we found that m DDX41 AML has high response to treatment and has comparable (if not possibly better) OS compared to other "favorable risk" AML. This study, although limited by the small number of patients, supports the universal testing for DDX41 mutation in adults with MN diagnosis. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Al-Kali: Astex: Other: Research support to institution; Novartis: Research Funding. Foran: abbvie: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; trillium: Research Funding; pfizer: Honoraria; takeda: Research Funding; revolution medicine: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; actinium: Research Funding; aptose: Research Funding; novartis: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; certara: Honoraria; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding. Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Salama: Mayo Clinic: Current Employment, Other: Mayo Clinic had the contractual work for the central pathology review for this study and I was one of the reviewing pathologists; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Litzow: Astellas: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee; Amgen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Pluristem: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; Omeros: Other: Advisory Board. Patnaik: Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Scoring System to Predict the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Its Validation in a Cohort of Ibrutinib-Treated Patients

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3118-3118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Visentin ◽  
Marina Deodato ◽  
Francesca Romana Mauro ◽  
Francesco Autore ◽  
Gianluigi Reda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Board Member ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Abstract BACKGROUD. The B-cell receptor inhibitor ibrutinib has significantly improved treatment and overall management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Although several data derived from clinical trials suggest that ibrutinib increases the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF), the incidence of AF in a real-life cohort of CLL patients is unknown. Furthermore, it would be clinically relevant to identify patients at high risk of AF during ibrutinib. The aim of this study is to report the prevalence and risk factors of AF in ibrutinib-naive CLL, in order to define a predictive model for the development of AF and to test it in a cohort of subjects receiving ibrutinib. METHODS. We retrospectively analyzed data from 860 ibrutinib-naive CLL patients, referred to the Padua University hospital. Comorbidities, clinical and biological prognostic markers were analyzed using the Mann-Whiney, Fisher exact or Chi-square tests, when appropriated. Time to AF (TTAF) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were run to identify independent factors associated with AF. Then, risk values were obtained based on the hazard ratios. The score for AF was calculated as the sum of each risk values. Subsequently, the model was evaluated in a cohort of 354 ibrutinib-treated patients referred from 8 Italian hematological centers. RESULTS. Among the 860 patients from Padua hospital, 60% were male, 49% were older than 65 years, 73% were Binet A stage at diagnosis and 41% underwent at least one line of treatment. A prior history of AF was present in 21 patients (2.4%) at CLL diagnosis, while, among the remaining 839 patients without a previous history of AF, 47 (5.6%) developed it after a median follow-up of 9.4 years, resulting in an estimated incidence of almost 0.8% cases/year. Moreover, the median OS for patients with AF was significantly shorter than that patients without AF (12 vs 22 years, p<0.0001). Based on univariate and multivariate analysis, variables associated with the risk of AF were: age>65 years (p=0.001, 1 point), male gender (p=0.003, 1 point), valvular hearth diseases (p=0.001, 2 points), cardiopathy (p<0.001, 3 points), hyperthyroidism (p=0.001, 1 point), chronic lung diseases (p=0.001, 1 point), diabetes mellitus (p=0.023, 1 point), severe infections (p=0.019, 1 point). As expected, no clinical and biological prognostic markers (i.e. Binet stage, IGHV mutation, TP53 abnormalities) for CLL were associated with an increased risk of AF. A predictive model was designed based on these factors and it stratified patients into 4 different groups. The estimated TTAF after 15 years of follow-up were 0%, 10%, 19% and 61% for patients with score 0, 1-2, 3-4, and ≥5 respectively (p<0.001, Fig. 1A). Furthermore, it underwent internal validation using the bootstrap method. Subsequently, we applied our AF model to a cohort of 354 ibrutinib-treated patients, 64% were male, the median age was 69 years, 88 were treatment-naive, 70% U-IGHV and 39% harbored TP53 abnormalities. Forty-four subjects developed AF after a median observation of 25 months, with an estimated 2-year TTAF of 12%. Only 9 out of the 44 patients (20%) discontinued ibrutinib. Sixteen patients (4%) were classified as AF score 0, 218 (62%) score 1-2, 73 (21%) score 3-4 and 46 (13%) at least score 5. Our model was also able to identify patients at a higher risk AF during ibrutinib, in fact the 2-year risk of AF was 0%, 5%, 17% and 40% for patients with score 0, 1-2, 3-4, and ≥5 respectively (p<0.001, Fig. 1B). Patients with a score of 5 or higher have a risk 20 times higher to developed AF than the other subjects (HR 19.6, 95% interval 7-52, p<0.0001). So far, the OS of ibrutinib-treated patients with AF was not inferior to that of patients who did not developed AF (2-years OS 89% and 82%, respectively p=0.1252), but the median follow-up is only 2 years. CONCLUSIONS. In this study, variables associated with an increased risk of developing AF were identified and recapitulated into a scoring system. Our model proved to be a valid tool to identify patients at a higher risk of developing AF, including ibrutinib-treated patients. Taking these data into account, patients with a score ≥5 should be carefully monitored during ibrutinib treatment given the very high-risk of developing AF or should be considered for alternative therapies. Disclosures Visentin: janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mauro:abbvie: Other: board member; janssen: Other: board member. Reda:Janssen and Cilag: Consultancy; ABBVIE: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Molica:Jansen: Other: Advisory board; Gilead: Other: Advisory board; Roche: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Other: Advisory board. Rigolin:Gilead: Research Funding. Tedeschi:Gilead: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy. Cortelezzi:novartis: Consultancy; abbvie: Consultancy; roche: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy. Coscia:Abbvie, Gilead, Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen, Karyopharm: Research Funding. Cuneo:Abbvie: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Other: advisory board, Speakers Bureau. Foà:CELGENE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; CELTRION: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; ABBVIE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau; GILEAD: Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; INCYTE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD; ROCHE: Other: ADVISORY BOARD, Speakers Bureau. Trentin:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding.

Factors Associated with Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Patients: Can We Predict Risk?

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 28-29
Author(s):  
Annie M. Jacobsen ◽  
Qing Cao ◽  
Veronika Bachanova ◽  
Surbhi Shah
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Catheter Related Thrombosis

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are central to the process of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) for hematologic malignancies. Large bore (14F to 15F) CVCs are routinely used for stem cell collection, administration of medications and blood products, and total parental nutrition. Up to 20% of patients experience catheter-related thrombosis (CRT), a major complication typically requiring at least 3 months of anticoagulation. This can lead to bleeding, further complicating the post-transplant course. Factors associated with CRT include endothelial damage due to conditioning regimens, bacteremia, and immobilizations. Furthermore, in ambulatory patients with cancer, increased risk of venous thromboembolism has been seen in patients with low hemoglobin (&lt;10 g/dL), elevated pre-chemotherapy leukocyte count (&gt;11 x 109/L), elevated pre-chemotherapy platelet count (&gt;350 x 109/L), those receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, and obesity (body mass index &gt; 35 kg/m2). We hypothesized that these factors may also confer CRT risk in those undergoing AHCT. To test this hypothesis and to further refine our understanding of the risks of CRT in this population, we compare characteristics of patients with CRT to those without in this retrospective, case-control study. Using prospectively collected data from the University of Minnesota Blood and Marrow Transplantation Database, we studied 1049 consecutive adults (age &gt; 18 years) with lymphoma or multiple myeloma who underwent AHCT between 2006 and 2019. Available medical records were manually curated for the occurrence of CRT. We identified 92 subjects with CRT events, which were defined as mural thrombus with partial or total occlusion of a vessel, pulmonary embolism, or right atrial thrombus in which a catheter was present or had been present within the prior 30 days. CRT diagnosis was made by imaging, which was performed for either symptoms or signs of venous thrombosis, or for routine disease surveillance. We then identified 184 controls who were matched for age, sex, disease, and transplant date. We excluded from our control group those who received prophylactic anticoagulation in the peri-transplant period. In a univariate analysis, we observed an increased risk in CRT in those patients with history of VTE (OR 32.00, 95% CI: 4.24-241.30), mucositis in the peri-transplant period (OR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.00-2.73), hemoglobin increased above the median of 10.3 g/dL (OR 1.48, 95% CI: 1.26-1.73), those with indwelling port in addition to CVC (OR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.02-3.05), and those with body mass index (BMI) &gt; 35 kg/m2 (OR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.12-5.34). Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis upheld the impact of BMI &gt; 35 kg/m2 (OR 2.53, 95% CI: 1.05-6.13). CRT is a major contributor to morbidity in the AHCT setting. Mucositis, presence of a port, and history of VTE have previously been associated with CRT events. Our study elucidates additional risk factors that may contribute to CRT risk, including obesity and higher than average hemoglobin concentration in comparison to the controls. Further study in larger cohorts is warranted to clarify the magnitude of risk of these factors in the adult AHCT population. Figure Disclosures Bachanova: BMS: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FATE: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shah:Aspen Pharma: Research Funding.

Polygenic Risk Score and Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL), and MBL Subtypes

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 35-36
Author(s):  
Geffen Kleinstern ◽  
J. Brice Weinberg ◽  
Sameer A. Parikh ◽  
Esteban Braggio ◽  
Dennis P. Robinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Polygenic Risk Score ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Polygenic Risk ◽  
C Statistic

Background MBL is a precursor to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and is subclassified into low-count (LC) MBL (absolute B-cell count&lt;0.5x109/L) and high-count (HC) MBL (absolute B-cell count between 0.5 and 5x109/L). We previously reported that a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on a weighted average of 41 CLL-susceptibility variants was associated with risk of both MBL and CLL among a cohort of individuals from CLL families. Here we evaluate this PRS in an independent cohort of MBL and CLL individuals of European ancestry (EA), all of whom were ascertained agnostic to CLL family-history status. We also evaluate the PRS by MBL subtype (LC/HC), and in African American (AA) CLL cases and controls. Methods We genotyped 535 EA MBLs (139 HC-MBL, 396 LC-MBLs), 735 CLLs (640 EA, 95 AA), and 2,866 controls (2,631 EA, 235 AA) from the Mayo Clinic CLL Resource, Duke University, and Weill Cornell Medical College. We computed the CLL-PRS for each individual and used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for age and sex. To assess discriminatory accuracy, we computed the c-statistic. Among EA individuals, we calculated a trend test among LC-MBL, HC-MBL, and CLL risk using the P-value for heterogeneity from a polytomous logistic regression analysis. Moreover, we plotted a boxplot for the PRS among controls, LC-MBL, HC-MBL, and EA CLL, as well as for AA CLL cases and controls, and tested the statistical difference using the Kruskal Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test, respectively. Results We found a significant association of PRS with overall MBL risk (OR=1.87, P=1.1x10-28) with good discrimination (c-statistic=0.72). Significant associations were also found for LC-MBL (OR=1.75, P=7.5x10-19, c-statistic=0.72), HC-MBL (OR=2.22, P=1.4x10-17, c-statistic=0.74), and CLL of EA (OR=2.60, P=1.2x10-62, c-statistic=0.78), with a significant difference among these cohorts (Figure 1.A) and a significant positive trend across these cohorts (Pheterogeneity=8.4x10-6). Although we observed a 33% increased risk of CLL in AA (c-statistic=0.57), the PRS was borderline significant (P=0.07, Figure 1.B). Conclusion The CLL-PRS is a strong prediction-tool for risk of CLL and MBL among individuals of EA. Future studies are needed to improve the PRS for AAs including performing GWAS of AA in order to identify CLL-susceptibility SNPs that are more representative within known CLL loci and to discover novel CLL loci that are unique for AAs. Disclosures Parikh: GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ascentage Pharma: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Verastem Oncology: Honoraria. Braggio:DASA: Consultancy; Bayer: Other: Stock Owner; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding. Brander:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Juno/Celgene/BMS: Other, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Other, Research Funding; Ascentage: Other, Research Funding; ArQule: Consultancy, Other, Research Funding; NCCN: Other; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tolero: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Tolero: Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria; DTRM: Other, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other; NCCN: Other; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding. Cerhan:NanoString: Research Funding; BMS/Celgene: Research Funding. Kay:Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cytomx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Meyer Squib: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Oncotracker: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Dava Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Furman:Acerta: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Oncotarget: Consultancy. Shanafelt:Mayo Clinic: Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property; Genentech, Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, AbbVie, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document