scholarly journals Clinical Relevance of Morphologic and Molecular Complete Remission in AML Patients Undergoing Reduced Intensity or Non-Myeloablative Conditioning

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Madlen Jentzsch ◽  
Dominic Brauer ◽  
Juliane Grimm ◽  
Marius Bill ◽  
Donata Backhaus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Genetic Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Remission Status ◽  
Active Disease ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Introduction: For most acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the best chance for relapse-free long-term survival. Evaluation of measurable residual disease (MRD) at HSCT allows risk stratification additionally to genetic risk at diagnosis. Pts with active AML or with positive MRD status (MRD+) pre-HSCT have similar and dismal outcomes following myeloablative conditioning. Reduced intensity (ric) or non-myeloablative (nma) conditioning regimes have been developed to allow HSCT also in AML pts with higher age or comorbidities. Here, we analyzed and compared the clinical relevance of morphologic and MRD-based remission status in AML pts prior to nma- or ric-HSCT. Methods: We analyzed 345 AML pts who received an allogeneic peripheral blood HSCT at a median age of 63 (range 21-77) years with active disease (34%), or in first (49%) or second (17%) complete remission (CR, 87% of pts in remission) or CR with incomplete peripheral recovery (CRi, 13% of pts in remission) after nma (75%) or ric (25%) conditioning. Donors were HLA matched related (11%), matched unrelated (67%), antigen mismatched unrelated (21%) or haploidentical related (1%). At diagnosis, cytogenetics and the mutation status of CEBPA, NPM1 and presence of FLT3-ITD were assessed. Using a next-generation targeted amplicon sequencing approach we analyzed a panel comprising 54 recurrently mutated genes in myeloid malignancies on the MiSeq platform (Illumina). Pre-HSCT morphologic remission status as well as MRD status in pts in morphologic CR/CRi based on NPM1 mutations, BAALC, MN1 and WT1 expression were evaluated. MRD+ pts were defined by being positive for any of the analyzed markers. Median follow up after HSCT was 2.2 years. Results: Pts transplanted with active disease differed from pts in remission with or without MRD pre-HSCT: they were less likely to have de novo AML (P=.02 & P=.09, respectively) and had higher genetic risk including a higher frequency of an abnormal (P=.001 & P<.001, respectively), a complex (P=.06 & P=.04, respectively) or a monosomal karyotype (P<.001 & P=.003, respectively), a lower frequency of NPM1 mutations (P<.001 & P<.001, respectively) and worse ELN genetic risk (P<.001 & P<.001, respectively). They were also more likely to receive ric-HSCT (P<.001 & P<.001) because pts with active AML were frequently transplanted after FLAMSA conditioning. Pre-HSCT MRD- pts only differed from pre-HSCT MRD+ pts regarding a lower white blood count (P=.006) and lower circulating blasts at diagnosis (P=.05) while the proportion of pts transplanted in CR or CRi did not differ between MRD- and MRD+ AML pts. Also the number of applied chemotherapy cycles prior to HSCT did not differ between the three pts groups. Pre-HSCT MRD- pts had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (CIR) compared to both MRD+ pts (P<.001) and pts transplanted with active disease (P<.001) while CIR did not differ between MRD+ pts and pts transplanted with active disease (P=.24, Figure 1A). Pre-HSCT MRD- pts had longer overall survival (OS) than pre-HSCT+ pts (P=.04) who again had longer OS than pts transplanted with active disease (P=.01, Figure 1B). In multivariate analyses, the MRD corrected remission status prior to HSCT remained a significant factor for CIR (Hazard Ratio 1.65, Confidence interval [CI] 1.31-2.06) after adjustment for ELN risk and for OS (Odds Ratio 0.63, CI 0.49-0.84) after adjustment for ELN risk, hemoglobin and platelet count at diagnosis. Conclusion: AML pts transplanted with active disease showed a variety of high-risk diagnostic parameters compared to pre-HSCT MRD- or MRD+ pts, as secondary disease and adverse genetic risk. In contrast, pre-HSCT MRD- and MRD+ pts could not be discriminated by high risk factors at diagnosis, underlining the importance of a dynamic risk stratification during remission. Both pts with active disease or a MRD+ status in CR/CRi prior to nma- or ric-HSCT showed dismal outcomes with higher CIR and shorter OS than MRD- pts. However, while CIR was comparable in pts with molecular or morphologic detectable disease, OS was worst in pts transplanted with active disease, indicating that MRD+ pts might still be salvageable after suffering relapse and able to achieve long-term outcomes. Figure Disclosures Jentzsch: JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Platzbecker:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Geron: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Schwind:Pfizer: Honoraria; JAZZ Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Sequential Treatment with Rituximab and CHOP Chemotherapy in B-Cell PTLD - Moving Forward to a First Standard of Care: Results From a Prospective International Multicenter Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 100-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Trappe ◽  
Sylvain Choquet ◽  
Stephan H.K. Oertel ◽  
Veronique Leblond ◽  
Daan Dierickx ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Sequential Treatment ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Abstract 100 Purpose: This trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with rituximab and CHOP-21 in patients with PTLD unresponsive to reduction of immunosuppression. Methods: An ongoing prospective, multicenter, international phase II trial was initiated in January 2003. Initially patients were treated with a fixed sequence of rituximab at days 1, 8, 15 and 22 (4R) followed by four cycles of CHOP-21 combined with G-CSF support starting 4 weeks after the last dose of rituximab (sequential treatment, ST). Based on the results of an earlier interim analysis showing that the response to rituximab predicts OS the trial was amended in 2007 introducing risk stratification according to the response to 4R (risk stratified sequential treatment, RSST). In RSST patients achieving a complete remission after 4R (low risk) continue with four 3-weekly courses of rituximab monotherapy while patients in PR, SD or PD (high risk) are followed by four cycles of R-CHOP-21 + G-CSF. Results: This is a scheduled interim analysis after inclusion of a total of 104 patients. The median follow up is 34.0 months for ST (64 pts.) and 9.1 months for RSST (40 pts.). 61 ST and 35 RSST patients were diagnosed with monomorphic PTLD, 3/5 with polymorphic PTLD. 27/23 patients were kidney, 3/0 kidney+pancreas, 15/8 liver, 13/6 heart, 6/3 lung or heart+lung transplant recipients. Median age at diagnosis of PTLD was 53/60 years (mean age: 48/56 years). 59%/58% of patients had an advanced stage of disease (Ann Arbor III/IV) and 49%/47% of tumors were EBV positive. 75%/75% of patients had late PTLD (i.e. later than 1 year after transplantation). LDH was elevated in 71%/64% of patients, respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) to 4 initial courses of rituximab monotherapy (4R, N=104) was 54% with a CR-rate of 32% and the subsequent completion of treatment with CHOP or R-CHOP allowed a clear increase of the response (p<0.0001, Fig. 1). With ST the final ORR was 89% (CR rate: 69%). 86%, 75% and 75% of patients were without disease progression at one, two and three years, respectively (Fig. 2a). Disease free survival was 87%, 78% and 70% at one, two and three years. There were 6 early treatment associated deaths (9%) resulting from infections (1 from CMV-colitis, 1 from PcP-pneumonia, 1 from fulminant hepatitis, 3 from sepsis) and 2/64 patients died from refractory PTLD. Two further patients died due to hemorrhage during treatment. With RSST the ORR was 90% and 73% achieved a complete remission. 90% of patients were without disease progression at one year (Fig. 2a). There was one early treatment related death due to infection (2.5%). This patient died from sepsis secondary to intestinal perforation in response to R-CHOP treatment. 2/40 patients died from refractory PTLD. With 1 event in 16 patients in both, the ST and the RSST-arms, subsequent consolidation with rituximab monotherapy (RSST) seems not to be inferior to consolidation with 4 cycles of CHOP (ST) in patients with a CR after 4R. Up to now there is no difference in toxicity between CHOP and R-CHOP in ST/RSST. Patients failing to achieve a complete remission with 4R (72 patients) seem to benefit from the subsequent escalation from CHOP to R-CHOP (Fig. 2b). Conclusions: This is the largest prospective study in PTLD. Sequential treatment with rituximab and CHOP-21 + G-CSF is well tolerated and highly effective with a treatment related mortality of less than 10% and an efficacy of up to 90%. In comparison to historic series of rituximab monotherapy, significantly more patients achieve a CR with sequential treatment and time to progression (TTP) is very much prolonged. In comparison to historic series of CHOP, sequential treatment is much better tolerated. This may result from a lower tumor burden and a better patient fitness at the time chemotherapy is applied. Introduction of risk stratification according to the response to 4 courses of rituximab monotherapy might further improve these results restricting chemotherapy related toxicity to high risk patients while these data suggest that low risk patients can effectively be treated with extended rituximab monotherapy. Thus, risk stratified sequential treatment (RSST) might further improve OS in this difficult to treat disease. Disclosures: Trappe: Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN GmbH: Research Funding. Choquet:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oertel:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Leblond:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Ekman:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Honoraria. Dührsen:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Salles:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Morschhauser:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Honoraria. Riess:Hoffmann La Roche Ltd.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AMGEN GmBH: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Molecular Predictors of Outcome in Patients with MDS and AML Following MDS after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 912-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Heuser ◽  
Christian Koenecke ◽  
Razif Gabdoulline ◽  
Patrick Löffeld ◽  
Vera Dobbernack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Complex Karyotype ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Signal Transducers ◽  
Active Disease

Introduction: The landscape of molecular aberrations in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) has been well characterized and has identified ASXL1, BCOR, CUX1, IDH1, IDH2, SRSF2, RUNX1, U2AF1, TP53 and others as negative prognostic markers for overall survival (OS). We comprehensively investigated the prognostic impact of genetic aberrations in the context of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in a large cohort of patients with high risk MDS or secondary AML following MDS (sAML). Patients and Methods: 308 Patients with a diagnosis of MDS (47.4%) or sAML (52.6%) who received an alloHSCT at four German university medical centers and for whom genomic DNA was available at a time with active disease before transplantation were evaluated for the presence of mutations in 54 genes by Illumina high-throughput sequencing. Results: At least one mutation was identified in 82% of our patients with a median number of 2 mutations per patient. The most frequently mutated genes were ASXL1 (24.4%), DNMT3A, (23.1%), RUNX1 (16.9%), TET2 (16.9%), STAG2 (12%), TP53 (11.7%), and SRSF2 (11%) in agreement with previous reports. Mutation frequencies were similar between MDS and sAML patients for all mutated genes except SRSF2, TET2 and WT1, which were more frequently mutated in sAML. We grouped the mutated genes into functional classes and found that patients most frequently had mutations in modifiers of DNA methylation (42.2%), followed by chromatin modifiers (41.5%), splicing genes (31.1%), transcription factors (30.8%), signal transducers (28.8%) and tumor suppressors (14.6%). Mean variant allele frequencies were highest in modifiers of DNA methylation (33.2%), while signal transducers had the lowest allele frequency (20.4%). We next assessed the prognostic impact of gene classes and individual genes on outcome of patients after alloHSCT. Median follow up from transplantation was 4.15 years. Median patient age at time of HSCT was 58 years (range 19-75). 76 patients (25%) werein complete remission and 232 patients (75%) had active disease before transplantation. Low, intermediate, and high risk cytogenetics according to IPSS were found in 116 (38%), 59 (19%), and 115 (37%) patients, respectively. Matched and mismatched related donor HSCT was performed in 71 and 4 patients, respectively (23.1 and 1.3%), and matched and mismatched unrelated donor HSCT in 171 and 62 patients, respectively (55.5 and 20.1%). The six functional gene classes had no prognostic impact on survival, cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality. We therefore evaluated the prognostic impact of individual gene mutations, of aberrations of chromosomes 3, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20 or a complex karyotype, and of transplant characteristics on OS. Parameters with significant impact on OS in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate cox proportional hazards model. Significant predictors of OS in multivariate analysis were mutations in PTPN11 (HR 3.1, present in 2.3% of pts.), IDH2 (HR 2.6, present in 4.2%), PHF6 (HR 2.2, present in 4.9%), NRAS (HR 1.8, present in 7.5%), presence of a complex karyotype (HR 1.8, present in 16.6%), transplantation from haploidentical donor (HR 5.5), RAEB/sAML not in complete remission before transplantation compared to untreated RA/RARS or RAEB/sAML and treated RAEB/sAML in remission (HR 2.0), GvHD prophylaxis other than calcineurin inhibitor with methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil (HR 1.7) and female sex of the donor (HR 1.7). TP53 mutations lost their unfavorable prognostic impact when complex karyotype was added to the multivariate model. Competing risk analysis for cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality showed that IDH2 and NRAS mutations and a complex karyotype were significantly associated with higher risk for relapse while PTPN11 and PHF6 mutations predicted for a higher incidence of non-relapse mortality. Importantly, a negative prognostic impact of ASXL1, BCOR, CUX1, IDH1, SRSF2, RUNX1 and U2AF1 seen previously in MDS patients not undergoing alloHSCT was not found in the transplant setting, suggesting that alloHSCT may overcome the unfavorable effect of these mutations. Conclusion: By extensive genetic characterisation of 308 MDS or sAML patients undergoing alloHSCT we identified mutations in IDH2, NRAS and complex karyotype as predictors of relapse and reduced OS and provide a matrix to refine risk prediction for allogeneic HSCT. Disclosures Heuser: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Platzbecker:Boehringer: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Thiede:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AgenDix GmBH: Equity Ownership.

A Novel Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen Induces a High Incidence of Sustained Donor Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment After Double-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4155-4155
Author(s):  
Doris M Ponce ◽  
Craig S. Sauter ◽  
Devlin Sean ◽  
Marissa N Lubin ◽  
Anne Marie R Gonzales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 4155 Introduction: Cord blood (CB) transplant (CBT) can be curative for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. However, patients of older age and/or with significant co-morbidities do not tolerate CBT with high-dose myeloablative conditioning. Non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning can reduce transplant-related mortality (TRM) and extend transplant access to older or infirm patients, but it is limited by the risks of graft rejection in patients without extensive prior chemotherapy and relapse. While the addition of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) may reduce rejection, it increases the risk of viral infections, including Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferative disease, and may also increase relapse risk. Methods: We investigated the safety and efficacy of an ATG-free regimen of intermediate intensity prior to double-unit CBT in 30 patients with acute leukemias and myelodysplasia. Units were 4–6/6 HLA-A, B antigen, DRB1 allele matched to the patient. The conditioning regimen included cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg (day -6), fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day × 5 (days -6 to -2), thiotepa 5 mg/kg/day × 2 (days -5 and -4), total body irradiation 200 cGy × 2 (days -2 and -1), and cyclosporine-A/mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression. The indication for this regimen was one or more risk factors for TRM including age > 50 years, extensive prior therapy, and/or significant co-morbidities. The hematopoietic cell transplant co-morbidity index (HCT-CI) score of Sorror was retrospectively assigned. Results: The median age was 56 years (range 18–69). All but one patient had high-risk disease. Twenty-one had AML (16 CR1, 5 CR2) with all CR1 patients having high-risk features, including high-risk cytogenetics (n = 3), FLT-3 ITD mutation (n = 5), therapy-related disease or prior MDS (n = 6), and/or > 3 consecutive induction chemotherapies (n = 2). Five had ALL (4 CR1, 1 CR3); the 4 in CR1 had BCR/ABL mutations (n = 3) or prior refractory CNS disease (n = 1). Four patients had MDS with 3 having an IPSS score > 2. The median HCT-CI score was 2.5 (range 1–5). Median infused TNC doses were 2.6 (larger unit) and 1.9 (smaller unit) × 107/kg, respectively. Ninety-seven percent of patients engrafted (95%CI: 87–100) at a median of 26 days (range 13–43). The median day 21 total donor bone marrow chimerism was 100% (range 71–100). All surviving patients were 100% donor by day 100, and sustained hematopoiesis has been mediated by a single unit in all but one patient. The cumulative incidence of platelet recovery > 20 × 109/L by day 180 was 93% (95%CI: 83–100), and occurred at a median of 46 days (range 30–79). Day 180 TRM and 2-year relapse incidences were 20% and 11%, respectively. With a median 26.5 months (range 9–53) follow-up of survivors, the 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) are both 60% (95%CI: 44–82). There was a hierarchy in 2-year DFS according to the Sorror HCT-CI score (Figure): the 11 patients (median age 55 years) with a score of 1 had a DFS of 82%. This compared with a 2-year DFS of 62% in the 9 patients (median age 51 years) with a score of 2–3, and 40% in the 11 patients (median age 58 years) with a score of 4–5 (p = 0.13). Discussion: This reduced intensity regimen combined with double-unit CBT reliably facilitates sustained donor engraftment without ATG. This regimen is associated with less toxicity than high-dose myeloablative conditioning. While other approaches are needed in patients with high comorbidity scores, this regimen is highly effective in older patients who are otherwise reasonably fit, as evidenced by the 82% 2-year DFS in patients with a median age of 55 years. Given the relatively low risk of relapse, it also represents a promising alternative to high-dose conditioning in younger patients. Disclosures: Giralt: Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Further Evidence to Not Delay Transplant for Continued ARA-C Consolidation in Patients with Intermediate or High Risk AML

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5544-5544
Author(s):  
James K. Feisal ◽  
Nicholas B. Pleat ◽  
Michael Machiorlatti ◽  
Summer Frank ◽  
Sara Vesley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
P Value ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Preparative Regimen ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Background: Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is indicated for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with high-risk disease on presentation or in relapsed or refractory cases. Durable elimination of leukemic burden after achieving a complete remission (CR) is thought to be an important prerequisite for successful transplant. Typically, this is achieved with consolidation treatments with cytarabine (ARA-C) in repeated cycles in non-refractory cases. Previous reports have suggested there is no apparent advantage for post-remission consolidation chemotherapy before reduced intensity transplant, provided a donor is readily available. Aim: To study the impact of the total cumulative dose of ARA-C in the pre-transplant setting before alloSCT either with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) or full myeloablative conditioning (MAC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review at the University of Oklahoma and affiliated hospitals in patients with AML in complete remission from October 2006 to December 2014. Appropriate IRB approval was obtained in accordance with Helsinki declaration. Simple descriptive statistics were created for all covariates [mean, SD for continuous covariates and n (%) for categorical variables]. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of each covariate with overall survival. Results: Sixty five patients were identified through our local leukemia registry with a mean age of 43, 57 (87.7%) were white, and 42 (64.6%) were male. Based on cytogenetics and molecular markers, 36 patients (55.3%) were intermediate risk and 20 patients (30.7%) were unfavorable risk status. For transplant preparative regimen, MAC was utilized in 50 cases (76.9%) and RIC was utilized in the other 15 (23.0%). Bone marrow stem cells were used in 28 cases (43.0%), peripheral blood cells were used in 26 cases (40.0%), and cord blood cells were used in the remaining 11 cases (16.9%). The mean dose of ARA-C given in consolidation was 43 g/m2 with standard deviation 31.5 g/m2. After adjusting for age and risk status, ARA-C consolidation was not associated with increased overall survival (OS) in the patients (p-value = 0.1776). When only considering those patients with myeloablative conditioning, ARA-C consolidation was still not associated with increased OS (p-value = 0.7533). Conclusions: Prior published data indicates that further ARA-C therapy given during consolidation does not correlate with improved outcomes post-transplant in patients with AML who received a reduced intensity preparative regimen. However, we attempted to expand this data to include patients who received a full myeloablative preparative regimen. Our experience using our single institution retrospective data suggests further ARA-C therapy given in consolidation does not benefit patients who underwent either RIC or MAC in terms of post-transplant survival. This provides further evidence that there should be no delay in moving patients to transplant, provided a suitable donor is available. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic HSCT for Children and Adolescents/Young Adults with CML: A Study from the Adult and Pediatric CML Working Group of the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3008-3008
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Shimada ◽  
Akihiko Tanizawa ◽  
Takeshi Kondo ◽  
Hideki Muramatsu ◽  
Masahiro Yasui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Japan Society ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Background: The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) has reduced the indications for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In children and adolescents/young adults (AYA), however, the long-term side effects of TKI and financial burden could become a future issue. Thus, the role of HSCT with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) as an alternative to TKI especially in the first chronic phase (CP1) should be defined for children and AYA with CML. However, less is well-known about the efficacy of RIC regimens on children and AYA with CML, in chronic phase (CP) as well as advanced phase. Aims: To describe the long-term outcomes of children and AYA with all phases of CML treated with a RIC HSCT and to define potential prognostic factors for outcome. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 3796 patients with CML using data from the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program of the Japan Society of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and included children and AYA under 30 years old at HSCT who underwent allo-HSCT between 2001 and 2014 and received TKI before HSCT. The myeloablative conditioning regimen was defined as TBI ≥ 8 Gy, busulfan > 8mg/kg, or melphalan > 180 mg/m2. Result: The characteristics of patients are summarized in Table 1. RIC was selected preferentially in patients with better status. The median follow-up of survivors was 64 months (3 - 171 months). There was no significant difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) among CP (124 cases), accelerated phase (AP) (23 cases) and blastic phase (BP) (53 cases) at diagnosis, 83%, 71% and 73%, respectively. In CP at diagnosis, 5-year OS was significantly higher in CP1 (89 cases) at HSCT than in CP2≤/AP/BP (35 cases) (89% versus 66%, p = 0.0004), and in CP1 at HSCT, there was no difference in 5-year OS between myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (58 cases) and RIC (31 cases) (both 89%) (Figure 1). However, 5-year OS in RIC was significantly higher in children (0-14 years old, 23 cases) than in AYA (15-29 years old, 8 cases) (95% versus 75%, p = 0.0495). Two of eight AYA patients with CP1 died after RIC HSCT due to grade IV acute GVHD-related complications without disease relapse, suggesting that the indications for RIC in AYA with CP1 should be carefully judged. In AP/BP at diagnosis, 5-year OS was significantly higher in the second chronic phase (CP2) (48 cases) at HSCT than in the third chronic phase (CP3)≤/AP/BP (28 cases) (82% versus 56%, p = 0.0073). However, the rate of major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at HSCT was significantly higher in CP2 than in CP3≤/AP/BP, and when focusing only on MCyR at HSCT in AP/BP at diagnosis, there was no difference in 5-year OS between CP2 at HSCT (40 cases) and CP3≤/AP/BP (13 cases) (83% versus 78%). On condition of MCyR at HSCT in AP/BP at diagnosis, regardless of the phase at HSCT, there was no difference in 5-year OS between MAC (46 cases) and RIC (7 cases: 2 in children and 5 in AYA) (79% versus 100%) (Figure 2), suggesting that even in AP/BP at diagnosis, RIC could be indicated for the patients with good response to TKI. On multivariate analysis, disease phase at HSCT and time from diagnosis to HSCT were independent predictors of OS in CP at diagnosis (Table 2), and cytogenetic response at HSCT and stem cell source in AP/BP at diagnosis (Table 3). There was no significant difference of OS between MAC and RIC. Conclusion: In HSCT for CML after TKI administration, the indications for RIC in children under 15 years old with CP1 are appropriate. In RIC HSCT for AYA patients under 30 years old with CP1, caution should be exercised in transplant-related mortality rather than disease progression. Furthermore, even in AP/BP at diagnosis, RIC could be indicated for children and AYA patients with MCyR at HSCT. Disclosures Ichinohe: Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Eisai Co.: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co.: Research Funding; Ono Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku Co.: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Repertoire Genesis Inc.: Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co.: Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.: Research Funding; Zenyaku Kogyo Co.: Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; JCR Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Novartis.: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Safety and Efficacy of Yttrium-90-Labeled Anti-CD45 Antibody (90Y-DOTA-BC8) Followed By a Standard Reduced-Intensity Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HCT) Regimen for Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1018-1018
Author(s):  
Phuong T. Vo ◽  
Ted Gooley ◽  
Joseph G. Rajendran ◽  
Darrell R. Fisher ◽  
Johnnie J. Orozco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
Active Disease ◽  
Reduced Intensity ◽  
Yttrium 90

Abstract Although HCT offers the best potential for cure for patients with high risk leukemia and MDS, the procedure may not be an option for all patients due to the toxicity of the conditioning regimen. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allo-HCT regimens are associated with lower non-relapse mortality (NRM), but patients receiving these regimens have a higher risk of relapse. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) can potentially deliver high doses of targeted radiation while minimizing toxicity to normal tissue. When combined with RIC allo-HCT, RIT may improve responses without increasing toxicity associated with myeloablative conditioning. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of yttrium 90 (90Y)-anti-CD45 antibody (MAb; BC8) followed by a standard RIC regimen with fludarabine (Flu) and 2 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) as a means of developing an improved HCT strategy for high-risk acute leukemia or MDS patients. We used CD45 as a target due to its ubiquitous expression on hematopoietic stem cells including the leukemic blasts. We used the high-energy (2.2 MeVmax) beta-emitter 90Y, which has a relatively short half-life (2.7 days) to eliminate targeted malignant cells. This phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT01300572) was designed to estimate the safety, feasibility and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 90Y-BC8-DOTA MAb when combined with Flu and 2 Gy TBI followed by HLA‐matched, related or unrelated allo-HCT for patients with high-risk leukemia or MDS. The MTD was defined as the radiation absorbed dose delivered by 90Y-BC8-DOTA MAb associated with a true dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 25%, where a DLT is defined as Bearman grade III/IV regimen-related toxicity. Doses of 90Y were escalated in increments of 2 Gy depending on the occurrence of DLT. Inclusion required patients to have advanced leukemia or high-risk MDS (defined as primary refractory or relapsed AML/ALL, secondary AML, MDS expressed as RAEB or CMML). To determine the dose of 90Y-BC8-DOTA, patients first underwent a biodistribution step using a trace-labeled infusion of 111Indium (111In)-BC8-DOTA followed by gamma-camera imaging. On pre-HCT day -12, patients received 90Y-BC8-DOTA at a prescribed radiation dose calculated from the trace-labeled 111In-BC8-DOTA biodistribution, followed by Flu (30 mg/m2/day) on days -4 to -2. TBI (2 Gy) was administered on day 0, prior to G-CSF mobilized donor PBSC infusion. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine. Fifteen patients, median age of 62 (range 37-76), were treated (10 with advanced AML, 5 with high-risk MDS). At time of HCT, 9 patients had refractory active disease while 6 were in remission with minimal residual disease (Table 1). The patients received 22.8 to 151.2 mCi of 90Y, delivering an average of 10.5 Gy to marrow, 70 Gy to spleen, and 17 Gy to liver. Although a maximum dose of 28 Gy was delivered to the liver, no DLT was observed. Therefore, the MTD could not be estimated. Treatment led to complete remission in 13 patients (87%), 2 patients had persistent disease after HCT. All patients engrafted with a median donor-derived CD3 and CD33 chimerism both 100% by day 28 after HCT. Ten patients (67%) developed grade II-IV acute GVHD (grade II: n=7; III: n=2; IV: n=1). Five patients (33%) developed chronic GVHD. Six patients relapsed, 5 of whom subsequently died due to progression of disease. The median time to relapse among these 6 patients was 59 days (range, 6- 351 days). One patient died from stage IV steroid-refractory GVHD. One patient died in remission from acute renal failure at 7 months after HCT. Eight patients (53%) are surviving with a median follow-up of 1.8 (range, 0.9-5.9) years. Estimated overall survival at one and two years were 66% and 46%, respectively, with progression-free survival estimated to be 46% at each of these time points. The 1-year estimate of relapse was 41% (Fig. 1). The inclusion of 90Y-BC8-DOTA into a RIC allo-HCT regimen is feasible, tolerable and no DLTs were observed. The efficacy of this approach is promising considering the high-risk leukemia/MDS patients with active disease enrolled. Current studies are evaluating the use of an alpha emitter, astatine-211, which is short-lived (t ½ = 7.2 hours) and provides high-energy radiation, conjugated to anti-CD45 MAb BC8 as part of an HCT conditioning regimen for patients with advanced AML, ALL, or high-risk MDS, in place of 90Y with the goal of continuing to improve outcomes using RIT for allo-HCT (NCT03128034). Disclosures Orozco: Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Green:Juno Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gopal:Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Aptevo: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Brim: Consultancy; Asana: Consultancy. Pagel:Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy.

Reduced Intensity Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Active Disease AML Is Associated with Leukemia Free Survival and Relapse Comparable to Myeloablative Conditioning

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3477-3477
Author(s):  
Se young Han ◽  
Rizwan Romee ◽  
Michael Slade ◽  
Pavan Kumar Bhamidipati ◽  
John F DiPersio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Conditioning Regimens ◽  
Active Disease ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Introduction: Up to 40% of new acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients fail to achieve complete remission (CR), and a significant number of patients achieving remission eventually relapse. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the best curative option for these patients with a long-term leukemia free survival (LFS) of around 20-30% with the use of intensive myeloablative condition (MAC) transplants. Active disease AML patients otherwise deemed unfit for MAC regimens have limited treatment options. Although reduced intensity condition (RIC) has broadened transplant eligibility in the elderly AML patients particularly in CR, there is a paucity of data on the use RIC allo-HCT in AML patients with active disease. To answer this question, we retrospectively analyzed data from active disease AML patients who underwent RIC allo-HCT and compared their outcomes with contemporaneous patients who underwent MAC allo-HCT at our institution. Patients and methods: Our cohort included all patients with active disease AML (primary induction failure, relapsed refractory or cytogenetic persistence) at the time of transplantation, who underwent allo-HCT at Washington University Medical Center in St. Louis between January 2006 and June 2015. Patients were classified according to the intensity of conditioning regimens: MAC versus RIC. The primary study endpoints were leukemia free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS). LFS was defined as the time from the achievement of CR after allo-HCT to the time of relapse, death in remission, or last follow-up. OS was defined as the time from transplantation to the time of death from any cause or last follow-up. The between-group differences in LFS and OS were described using Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves and compared by log-rank test. Univariate Cox regression analysis for LFS was performed. All analyses were two-sided, and significance was set at a p-value of 0.05, using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institutes, Cary, NC). Results: 138 patients were included. 30 patients (21.7%) underwent RIC allo-HCT and 108 (78.3%) underwent MAC allo-HCT. Their baseline characteristics are listed in Table 1. 21 patients (72.4%) in RIC and 77 (81.9%) in MAC achieved CR on day-28 bone marrow biopsy. Notably, there were 16 patients (1 RIC and 15 MAC) who died prematurely without post-transplant evaluation; subsequently they were excluded from LFS, relapse and NRM calculations. There was no difference in the LFS in these two groups; 1-year and 3-year LFS were 40.6% (95% CI 23-70) and 33.1% (95% CI 17-66) in the RIC patients while 40.7% (95% CI 31-54) and 33.2% (95% CI 23-47) in the MAC patients, respectively (p=0.99) (Figure 1A). Similarly the CI of relapse at 1 year and 3 year was not different in the two groups; 45.8% (95% CI 30-71) and 50.5% (95% CI 33-76) in RIC group vs. 51.9% (95% CI 43-63) and 56.8% (95% CI 48-67) in MAC group, respectively (p=0.61) (Figure 1B). The CI of NRM at 1-year and 3-year was 28.1% (95% CI 16-50) and 32.6% (95% CI 19-56) in RIC group compared to 17.9% (95% CI 11-28) and 21.0% (95% CI 14-31) in the MAC group (p = 0.21). However, OS in both groups remained poor with 1-year and 3-year OS of 25.1% (95% CI 14-44) and 13.2% (95% CI 6-31) in RIC vs. 35.5% (95% CI 28-46) and 22.0% (95% CI 15-32) in MAC, respectively (p = 0.21). On univariate analysis for LFS and relapse, only cGvHD was associated with higher LFS (p<0.01, HR 0.27, 95% HR 0.13-0.52) and lower relapse risk (p= 0.01, HR 0.37, 95% HR 0.15-0.89) in these patients. On multivariate analysis for LFS, only cGvHD was statistically significant (p<0.01, HR 0.32, 95% HR 0.18-0.56). On the other hand, intermediate cytogenetic risk (p=0.01, HR 1.59, 95% HR 1.08-2.34) and cGvHD (p<0.01, HR 0.12, 95% HR 0.05-0.27) were significant for OS. Conclusion: The use of RIC allo-HCT in active disease AML is associated with LFS and relapse comparable to MAC allo-HCT. However, high relapse rates and NRM, in both groups translated into poor long term OS. Careful selection of patients and early utilization of transplant without subjecting these patients to multiple salvage regimens might help lower NRM rates in future studies. Notably, our study might open a window for future prospective studies aimed at finding improved ways to harness the graft versus leukemia (GvL) effect associated with RIC transplantation in patients who are otherwise not able to tolerate more toxic intensive conditioning regimens. LFS LFS Figure 1 Relapse Figure 1. Relapse Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures DiPersio: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Vij:Karyopharm: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation after Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) Is Effective for Long-Term Disease Control in High-Risk AML Patients in First Complete Remission.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3020-3020
Author(s):  
Philipp G. Hemmati ◽  
Gero Massenkeil ◽  
Theis H. Terwey ◽  
Stefan Neuburger ◽  
Philipp le Coutre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is recommended for patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). Whereas conventional myeloablative conditioning is associated with a considerable treatment-related mortality (TRM), less intensive conditioning regimens may not be as efficient for long-term disease control, particularly in high-risk patients. Here, we present a retrospective single-institution analysis of 90 patients with median age of 39 years (range 17–66) with high-risk AML, i.e. based on non-favorable karyotype (not t(15;17), t(8;21) or inv(16)), blast persistence on day 16, the failure to achieve CR1 after two courses of induction therapy or the presence of secondary or therapy-induced AML, who underwent alloHSCT in CR1 between 1994 and 2007 (median follow-up 26, range 1–147 months). As stem cell source bone marrow (BM) was used in 17/90 patients (19%), whereas 73/90 patients (81%) received peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). In 61/90 patients (68%) standard high-dose myeoloablative conditioning (12 Gy TBI + 120 mg/kg CY), (TBI group), was administered, whereas 29/90 (32%) patients received reduced-intensity conditioning (FLUD/BU/ATG)(RIC). A matched-related donor (MRD) was available for 62/90 patients (69%), whereas alloHSCT was performed from an unrelated donor (URD) in 28/90 patients (31%). Prevention of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) consisted of CSA/MTX in the TBI group or CSA/MMF in the RIC group. 48/90 (53%) patients had a normal karyotype, whereas 39/90 patients (43%) displayed an aberrant karyotype. Projected overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the whole cohort at 1, 3, and 5 years was 74%, 62%, and 57% and 72%, 58%, 54%, respectively. Causes of death were relapse (17/90 = 19%) or TRM (17/90 = 19%). The OS in the TBI group versus the RIC group was 72% vs. 79% at 1 year, 64% vs. 52 at 3 years, and 59% vs. 52% at 5 years (p = 0.78). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the 1, 3, and 5-years DFS rates (72%, 62%, 57% vs. 75%, 50%, 49%) between the two groups. OS and DSF reached a plateau beyond 39 months (TBI group) and 33 months (RIC group). Relapse and TRM in the TBI group versus the RIC group were 21% vs. 14% and 16% vs. 24%. A comparison of the OS between the subgroups with a normal (n = 48) versus an aberrant (n = 39) karyotype revealed no significant difference at 1 year (83% vs. 65%), 3 years (70% vs. 47%), and 5 years (67% vs. 45%) (p = 0.06). Notably, there was no significant difference in the incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) between the TBI group and the RIC group (46% vs. 52%). Taken together, these results suggest that patients with AML in CR1 achieve a robust and durable long-term remission irrespective of the conditioning intensity (TBI vs. RIC) and the presence of an aberrant karyotype.

Long-term survival of patients with AML in remission after reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (RISCT)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7002-7002
Author(s):  
U. R. Popat ◽  
M. de Lima ◽  
P. Anderlini ◽  
B. Andersson ◽  
D. Couriel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Comorbidity Scores ◽  
Reduced Intensity

7002 Background: RISCT was developed to harness graft versus leukemia effect to treat older patients (pts) and pts with comorbidities. Limited data are available on long term outcome of pts with high risk AML treated in complete remission (CR), a group most likely to benefit from this approach. Methods: Thirty six consecutive pts with AML in CR, treated between 1999 and 2006 with Fludarabine 120–125 mg/m2 and Melphalan 100–140 mg/m2 are included. Pts were not eligible for myeloablative transplantation because of age or comorbidity. Tacrolimus and Methotrexate were used as GVHD prophylaxis. Additionally pts receiving stem cells from an unrelated donor received rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Results: There were 24 males and 12 females with a median age of 57 (range 21–71). Eighteen(50%) pts had secondary AML. Thirty(83%) pts were in first CR and 6(17%) in second CR. Cytogenetic risk groups were as follows: 2 good risk (in CR2), 22 intermediate risk(61%), and 10(28%) poor risk. Source of stem cells was peripheral blood in 18 pts (50%) and bone marrow in 18 pts (50%). Donors were siblings in 21(58%) pts and unrelated in 15 (42%)pts. Hematopoietic cell transplant specific comorbidity score of 3 or higher was present in 26 pts (72%). All pts engrafted achieving full donor chimerism by day 30 with median time to neutrophil engraftment of 12.5 days (8–19 days). Cumulative incidence of grade 2–4 acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), grade 3–4 GVHD and chronic GVHD was 25% (95% CI; 14%–44%), 11% (95% CI; 4%–28%), and 63% (95% CI; 47%–84%) respectively. Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 19% (95% CI; 8%–41%). With a median follow up of 852 days, 3 year overall and disease free survival is 75% (SE 9%) and 63% (SE 10%) respectively. Comorbidity scores didnot impact outcome. Conclusions: Reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation with Fludarabine and Melphalan conditioning produces durable long term remission in pts with high risk AML in complete remission. These results in older pts and/or pts with comorbidities are comparable to published results in younger pts receiving myeloablative transplantation. Comorbidity scores by themselves should not be used to exclude patients from receiving transplant. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document