scholarly journals Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Mobilization of CD34+ Cells with Combine G-CSF and GM-CSF in Pediatric Patient Outcome and Economic Advantage

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Heidy lyz Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Economic Advantage ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Stems Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Background: Clinical trials to mobilize PBPC for autologous and allogeneic harvesting prior to high dose chemotherapy/radiotherapy include chemotherapy, cytokines, or chemotherapy combine with cytokines. PBPC mobilized by G-CSF or GM-CSF reduces the hematological toxicity and supportive care requirements in recipients of autologous and allogeneic transplants, in our study we combined G-CSF and GM-CSF to mobilize PBPC for transplantation. Methods: We selected 63 patients with different cancers to participate in the study and 7 healthy donors. We utilize to mobilize in all the patient the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF (10μg/Kg/day each) administered for 5 consecutive days. Then we proceed it to harvest the PBPC until we obtain a threshold of 2.0 x 10^6/Kg CD34+ cells. A total of 31 PBPC transplants were performed (27 autologous and 8 allogeneic). Neutrophil engraftment was defined as ANC> 500/mm³ and, platelet engraftment was defined as a platelet count > 30,000/mm³ (transfusion independent) for more than 48 hours. Results: Data on PBC 24, 48, 72, and 96hrs. For the 31 PBPC autologous transplant patients, the median days to ANC>500 was 10.6 days; 11 days for the allogeneic. None of the subject's experience bone pain, headache, flu like side effects or a documented or proven infection. Median days to platelet engraftment following infusion CD34+ cells, was 13.2 for the autologous PBPC; 13 days for the allogeneic. Conclusions: The combination the G-CSF and GM-CSF (10μg/kg/day x 5 days) was well tolerated. We can appreciate that there is a reduction in the duration and severity of neutropenia as well of thrombocytopenia in both types of transplant (autologous/allogeneic). The GVHD incidence were not increase by the use of G-CSF and GM-CSF. We conclude that this procedure is cost effective and a suitable way to mobilize an average number of PBPC (from 1-3 apheresis) in a shorter amount of time indicating an economic advantage. It is proven to be less expensive than other agent used to mobilize stems cells for transplant. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Impact of Disease and Mobilizing Agents on Initial and Remobilization Failure.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5222-5222
Author(s):  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
Angela Smith ◽  
Dianne Sempek ◽  
Albert Baker ◽  
Steven Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease State ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Scheffe Test ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a widely used treatment strategy in lymphoma and myeloma; however, no standard approach for the mobilization of peripheral hematologic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) has been established. Levels of circulating CD34+ cells, a surrogate marker for mobilization efficiency, vary widely between pts, and may be influenced by disease state, prior therapy, and/or mobilization regimen. Methods: The Washington University (St. Louis, MO) transplantation database includes clinical parameters from 407 multiple myeloma (MM), 562 non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), and 164 Hodgkin’s disease (HD) pts who received an ASCT between 1995 and 2006. A retrospective analysis of this large (1133 pts) population was conducted to determine factors associated with mobilization efficiency. Mobilization failure was defined as collection of < 2 × 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg within 5 apheresis days. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Scheffe Test to determine differences in mobilization between the various mobilization regimens (G-CSF, G-CSF/chemotherapy, G-/GM-CSF, G-CSF/AMD3100). Results: All pts were included in the analysis; 87% received G-CSF alone as the initial mobilization regimen. Mobilization failure rates are summarized in Table 1. NHL and HD pts had an approx. 4-fold higher failure rate than MM pts. The combination of G-CSF with chemotherapy increased the median CD34+ yield compared to G-CSF alone, although no obvious impact on the failure rate was noted in this relatively small group of pts. Remobilization was associated with high failure rates in NHL (79.2%), HD (77.1%), and MM (73.3%). Pooled collections were <2 × 10^6 CD34+/kg in 33.6%, 37.1%, and 36.7% of failed mobilizers, respectively. ANOVA analysis indicated a significant difference in outcome based on remobilization regimen. A post hoc comparison using the Scheffe Test determined that G-CSF mobilization failures remobilized with G-CSF plus AMD3100 collected significantly more CD34+ cells than G-CSF-failures remobilized with either G-CSF, G/GM-CSF or G-CSF/chemo (1-way ANOVA: F(3, 233) = 27.878, F0.5(3, 233).05 = 2.643, p < .0001). The compared groups did not significantly differ in initial mobilization efficiency with G-CSF (as determined by ANOVA and Scheffe Test). Conclusions: The mobilization failure rate is substantially higher in NHL and HD pts than MM pts. Pts who fail initial mobilization are highly likely to fail a 2nd mobilization, regardless of disease state. As the combination of chemotherapy to G-CSF may not be sufficient to reduce failure rates, alternative mobilization strategies are needed to improve HSPC collection, particularly in NHL/HD pts and failed mobilizers. First mobilization failure rates (< 2×10^6 CD34+/kg) Mobilization regimen N Failures Median yield (×10^6) 95% C.I (×10^6) * Incl. pts mobilized w. alternative regimens NHL G-CSF 471 26.5% 2.89 2.76–3.04 G-CSF/Chemo 35 22.9% 4.68 2.8–8.53 All* 564 28.7% HD G-CSF 130 26.2% 3.01 2.75–3.37 G-CSF/Chemo 12 16.7% 5.38 2.35–9.52 All* 165 24.8% MM G-CSF 386 6.5% 4.62 4.16–4.98 G-CSF/Chemo 17 5.9% 8.52 4.46–16.3 All* 409 6.6%

Autologous transplantation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor–primed bone marrow is effective in supporting myeloablative chemotherapy in patients with hematologic malignancies and poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization

Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 1595-1600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto M. Lemoli ◽  
Antonio de Vivo ◽  
Daniela Damiani ◽  
Alessandro Isidori ◽  
Monica Tani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Stem Cell Mobilization ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Myeloablative Chemotherapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Recovery ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Stimulating Factor

AbstractWe assessed the hematopoietic recovery and transplantation-related mortality (TRM) of patients who had failed peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and subsequently received high-dose chemotherapy supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–primed bone marrow (BM). Studied were 86 heavily pretreated consecutive patients with acute leukemia (n = 21), refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 41) and Hodgkin disease (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 7). There were 78 patients who showed insufficient mobilization of CD34+ cells (&lt; 10 cells/μL), whereas 8 patients collected less than 1 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. BM was primed in vivo for 3 days with 15 to 16 μg/kg of subcutaneous G-CSF. Median numbers of nucleated cells, colony-forming unit cells (CFU-Cs), and CD34+ cells per kilogram harvested were 3.5 × 108, 3.72 × 104, and 0.82 × 106, respectively. Following myeloablative chemotherapy, median times to achieve a granulocyte count higher than 0.5 × 109/L and an unsupported platelet count higher than 20 and 50 × 109/L were 13 (range, 8-24), 15 (range, 12-75), and 22 (range, 12-180) days, respectively, for lymphoma/myeloma patients and 23 (range, 13-53), 52 (range, 40-120), and 90 (range, 46-207) days, respectively, for leukemia patients. Median times to hospital discharge after transplantation were 17 (range, 12-40) and 27 (range, 14-39) days for lymphoma/myeloma and acute leukemia patients, respectively. TRM was 4.6%, whereas 15 patients died of disease. G-CSF–primed BM induces effective multilineage hematopoietic recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and can be safely used in patients with poor stem cell mobilization.

The More Effective and the More (bio) Similar: Plerixafor and Filgrastim XM02 (tevagastrim) As First Line PBSC Mobilization Strategy in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Lymphomas Candidate to ABMT

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2994-2994
Author(s):  
Daniele Laszlo ◽  
Giovanna Andreola ◽  
Aleksandra Babic ◽  
Mara Negri ◽  
Cristina Rabascio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
European Medicines Agency ◽  
High Dose ◽  
First Line ◽  
Adequate Number ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Abstract Abstract 2994 Patients affected by hematologic malignancies might benefit from high dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cells (PBSC) transplant. Chemotherapy in combination with G-CSF is effective in mobilizing stem cells but often toxic, might require prolonged hospitalization and extensive supportive care. Moreover a high proportion of patients, ranging from 11 to 53%, fail to collect an adequate number of stem cells with this approach. In this setting plerixafor, a CXCR4 chemokine antagonist, has shown to increase the number of circulating CD34+ cells in cancer patients when used alone or with G-CSF and to be able to rescue patients unable to mobilize with traditional regimens. Recently, several forms of biosimilar nonglycosylated recombinant human G-CSF have been clinically developed and approved by the European Medicines Agency for the same indications as the reference filgrastim product on the basis of comparable quality, efficacy, and safety. Biosimilars also provide a more cost-effective strategy and their use in clinical setting may provide cost savings in their indicated uses. From December 2010 to July 2011, 16 patients, median age 55 (19–67), affected by Non-Hodgking Lymphoma (6), Hodgking Disease (2) and MM (8), received a combination of biosimilar version of G-CSF (Tevagrastim) and plerixafor in order to mobilize PBSC as first line strategy. Tevagrastim was self-administered (10μg/kg/die) for 3 days; on day 4 patients were admitted to the hospital, circulating CD34+ cells counted and if >20 cells/μl, plerixafor was administered (0.24mg/kg) 12 hours before the scheduled apheresis. There were 7 males and 9 females, median lines of previous chemotherapy was 1(1–4). Median number of circulating CD34+ cells on day 4 was 16 (8–42). Plerixafor was administered to all but 1 patients who had already 42 CD34+ cells/μl on day 4. On day 5, after plerixafor administration median number of circulating CD34+ cells had raised to 68/μl (18–138). All the patients underwent leukapheresis and were able to collect an adequate number of CD34+ cells necessary for the transplantation procedure with a median number of 5.2 ×106 (2.2–10.6) CD34+cells/kg in a median number of 1 procedure (1–2). For patients with Multiple Myeloma, 6/8 patients were able to collect a median of 5.8×106 CD34+/kg (4.2–10.6) in a single procedure. No major side effect was observed. So far, 7/16 patients underwent high dose chemotherapy followed by PBSC transplant. Engraftment occurred in all patients with a time to ANC>500 of 12 (9–13) and of PLT>20.000 of 13 (9–19) days. The combination of tevagrastim and plerixafor is safe and effective in mobilizing PBSC and allows a collection of a more than adequate number of cells in most of the patients in a maximum of 2 apheresis procedure, even in patients with MM who need to collect a double amount cells. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Is There a Role for Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation (ASCT) in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL)? Final Results of a Prospective Phase II Study from the GELCAB.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3070-3070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Mercadal ◽  
Armando Lopez-Guillermo ◽  
Javier Briones ◽  
Blanca Xicoy ◽  
Carme Pedro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Severe Infection ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract The outcome of patients (pts) with PTCL receiving conventional therapy is dismal. Because of this, there is an increasing interest to investigate intensive treatments in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the toxicity, response and outcome of a phase II trial that includes high-dose chemotherapy (CT) plus ASCT as first-line treatment for pts with PTCL. Forty-one pts (30M/11F; median age: 47 yrs.) diagnosed with PTCL (excluding cutaneous and anaplastic ALK+), in stages II-IV and <65 years were the subject of this analysis. Twelve pts (29%) presented with primary extranodal disease, 29 (71%) were in stage IV, and 14 (35%) had bone marrow involvement. Forty-six percent of the pts had high/intermediate or high-risk IPI, whereas 49% were in the groups 3 or 4 according to the Italian Index for PTCL. Pts received intensive CT (3 courses of high-dose CHOP [cyclophosphamide 2000 mg/m2 day 1, adriamycin 90 mg/m2 day 1, vincristine 2 mg day 1, prednisone 60 mg/m2/day, days 1 to 5, mesnum 150% of cyclophosphamide dose, G-CSF 300 mg/day days 7 to 14], alternating with 3 courses of standard ESHAP). Responders (CR or PR) were submitted to ASCT. Median follow-up of surviving pts was 3.2 years (range, 0.6–8.1). Twenty-eight pts (68%) received the planned 6 courses of CT. Response rate after CT was as follows: CR, 20 cases (49%); PR, 4 (10%); failure, 17 (41%), including one pt who died because of sepsis. Hematological toxicity of CT mainly consisted of neutropenia (median nadir after high-dose CHOP and ESHAP: 0.01 and 0.4x109/L, respectively) and thrombocytopenia (23 and 29x109/L, respectively). Severe infection requiring hospitalization was observed in 38 and 15% of courses of high-dose CHOP or ESHAP, respectively. Only 17 of the 24 candidates (41% of all pts) received ASCT due to the lack of stem-cell mobilization (3 cases), severe previous toxicity (2), early relapse of the lymphoma (1) and pt decision (1). No major toxicity was observed after ASCT. The overall response after the whole treatment was: CR, 21 cases (51%), PR, 3 (7%), failure, 17 (42%). Four-year failure-free survival (FFS) was 30% (95%CI: 14–46%), whereas 4-year EFS was 51% (95%CI: 29–73%). Twenty-two pts have died during follow-up, with a 4-yr OS of 39% (95%CI: 22–56%). Notably, no significant differences in the outcome were seen among the 24 pts candidates for ASCT according to whether or not they eventually underwent this procedure. Four of 17 transplanted and 4 of 7 nontransplanted pts eventually relapsed. In addition, 2 pts died in CR after ASCT due to the development of a Burkitt-like lymphoma and lung cancer at 18 and 5 months from the procedure. Thus, 4-year EFS was 59% (95%CI: 33–85%) and 29% (95%CI 0–73%) for transplanted and nontransplanted pts, respectively (p>0.1). Four-year OS was 57% (95%CI: 31–83%) and 71% (95%CI: 37–100%), respectively (p>0.1). In summary, in this series of patients with PTCL a relatively high CR rate was obtained with high-dose CHOP/ESHAP followed by ASCT. Toxicity was manageable. The contribution of ASCT to pts outcome is debatable because of the absence of significant differences in OS and EFS of patients in CR transplanted vs. those not transplanted. Novel strategies aimed at increasing the CR rate in these patients warrant investigation.

scholarly journals Ex vivo expansion of enriched peripheral blood CD34+ progenitor cells by stem cell factor, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), IL-6, IL-3, interferon-gamma, and erythropoietin

Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. 2579-2584 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Brugger ◽  
W Mocklin ◽  
S Heimfeld ◽  
RJ Berenson ◽  
R Mertelsmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Interferon Gamma ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Factor Combination

Abstract To provide sufficient numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for repetitive use after high-dose chemotherapy, we investigated the ability of hematopoietic growth factor combinations to expand the number of clonogenic PBPCs ex vivo. Chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized CD34+ cells from 18 patients with metastatic solid tumors or refractory lymphomas were cultured for up to 28 days in a liquid culture system. The effects of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1), IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF), G-CSF, macrophage-CSF (M-CSF), stem cell factor (SCF), erythropoietin (EPO), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and interferon- gamma, as well as 36 combinations of these factors were tested. A combination of five hematopoietic growth factors, including SCF, EPO, IL-1, IL-3, and IL-6, was identified as the optimal combination of growth factors for both the expansion of total nucleated cells as well as the expansion of clonogenic progenitor cells. Proliferation peaked at days 12 to 14, with a median 190-fold increase (range, 46- to 930- fold) of total clonogenic progenitor cells. Expanded progenitor cells generated myeloid (colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage), erythroid (burst-forming unit-erythroid), as well as multilineage (colony-forming unit-granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte, megakaryocyte) colony-forming units. The number of multilineage colonies increased 250- fold (range, 33- to 589-fold) as compared with pre-expansion values. Moreover, the absolute number of early hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34+/HLA-DR-; CD34+/CD38-), as well as the number of 4-HC-resistant progenitors within expanded cells increased significantly. Interferon- gamma was shown to synergize with the 5-factor combination, whereas the addition of GM-CSF significantly decreased the number of total clonogenic progenitor cells. Large-scale expansion of PB CD34+ cells (starting cell number, 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells) in autologous plasma supplemented with the same 5-factor combination resulted in an equivalent expansion of progenitor cells as compared with the microculture system. In summary, our data indicate that chemotherapy plus G-CSF-mobilized PBPCs from cancer patients can be effectively expanded ex vivo. Moreover, our data suggest the feasibility of large- scale expansion of PBPCs, starting from small numbers of PB CD34+ cells. The number of cells expanded ex vivo might be sufficient for repetitive use after high-dose chemotherapy and might be candidate cells for therapeutic gene transfer.

scholarly journals Ex vivo expansion of enriched peripheral blood CD34+ progenitor cells by stem cell factor, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), IL-6, IL-3, interferon-gamma, and erythropoietin

Blood ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 81 (10) ◽  
pp. 2579-2584 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Brugger ◽  
W Mocklin ◽  
S Heimfeld ◽  
RJ Berenson ◽  
R Mertelsmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Interferon Gamma ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Interleukin 1 ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Factor Combination

To provide sufficient numbers of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) for repetitive use after high-dose chemotherapy, we investigated the ability of hematopoietic growth factor combinations to expand the number of clonogenic PBPCs ex vivo. Chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized CD34+ cells from 18 patients with metastatic solid tumors or refractory lymphomas were cultured for up to 28 days in a liquid culture system. The effects of interleukin-1 beta (IL-1), IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte-macrophage-CSF (GM-CSF), G-CSF, macrophage-CSF (M-CSF), stem cell factor (SCF), erythropoietin (EPO), leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), and interferon- gamma, as well as 36 combinations of these factors were tested. A combination of five hematopoietic growth factors, including SCF, EPO, IL-1, IL-3, and IL-6, was identified as the optimal combination of growth factors for both the expansion of total nucleated cells as well as the expansion of clonogenic progenitor cells. Proliferation peaked at days 12 to 14, with a median 190-fold increase (range, 46- to 930- fold) of total clonogenic progenitor cells. Expanded progenitor cells generated myeloid (colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage), erythroid (burst-forming unit-erythroid), as well as multilineage (colony-forming unit-granulocyte, erythrocyte, monocyte, megakaryocyte) colony-forming units. The number of multilineage colonies increased 250- fold (range, 33- to 589-fold) as compared with pre-expansion values. Moreover, the absolute number of early hematopoietic progenitor cells (CD34+/HLA-DR-; CD34+/CD38-), as well as the number of 4-HC-resistant progenitors within expanded cells increased significantly. Interferon- gamma was shown to synergize with the 5-factor combination, whereas the addition of GM-CSF significantly decreased the number of total clonogenic progenitor cells. Large-scale expansion of PB CD34+ cells (starting cell number, 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells) in autologous plasma supplemented with the same 5-factor combination resulted in an equivalent expansion of progenitor cells as compared with the microculture system. In summary, our data indicate that chemotherapy plus G-CSF-mobilized PBPCs from cancer patients can be effectively expanded ex vivo. Moreover, our data suggest the feasibility of large- scale expansion of PBPCs, starting from small numbers of PB CD34+ cells. The number of cells expanded ex vivo might be sufficient for repetitive use after high-dose chemotherapy and might be candidate cells for therapeutic gene transfer.

Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization by G-CSF Alone and Engraftment Kinetics Following Autologous Transplantation in Children and Adolescents with Solid Tumor.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5197-5197
Author(s):  
Hiroyoshi Watanabe ◽  
Tsutomu Watanabe ◽  
Hiroko Suzuya ◽  
Yoshifumi Wakata ◽  
Toshihiro Onishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Platelet Recovery ◽  
Irradiation Group ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Pediatric Cancer Patients ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Cell Mobilization

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the yield of PBSC, mobilized with G-CSF alone, and engraftment kinetics after autologous transplantation in pediatric cancer patients. In 55 patients (median age; 7 years, range 0–21) with various pediatric and adolescent solid tumors, PBSC were mobilized with G-CSF alone, and the yields of PBSC and engraftment following autologous PBSCT were evaluated retrospectively. Patients were categorized according to prior treatment; patients who had received less than 4 or 4 cycles of chemotherapy with/without local irradiation (Group 1: N= 21), patients who received more than 4 cycles of chemotherapy or 3 or more cycles of chemotherapy with extended irradiation (Group 2: N= 23), and patients who received high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support (Group 3: N= 11). Ten microgram per kg of G-CSF was injected subcutaneously for mobilization when patients showed no influence of previous chemotherapy, and administration was continued for five days. The peaks of CD34+ cells and CFU-GM were observed on day 5 of G-CSF administration essentially in all patients. Aphereses were performed on days 5 and 6 of G-CSF treatment. Mobilization failure was observed in four patients in all groups. Compared with the results in patients mobilized by chemotherapy plus G-CSF (N=18), the progenitor cell yields were lower in those mobilized with G-CSF alone. However, there were no significant differences in WBC engraftment speed compared to the chemotherapy plus G-CSF mobilization group, although platelet recovery was delayed in patients with G-CSF alone, especially in patients in Group 3. The median time taken for ANC and platelet counts to reach 500 and 20K was 12 days (range 8–28) and 15 days (8–55), respectively, in all patients who were mobilized by G-CSF alone except for patients with progressive disease. In summary, mobilization with G-CSF alone can mobilize a sufficient number of CD34+ cells for successful autografting and sustained hematological reconstitution in pediatric patients with cancer, even in heavily pre-treated patients. Mobilization with G-CSF alone might offer some advantages, such as ease of determining a collection schedule without a daily determination of CD34+ cells in the blood, and the avoidance of neutropenic fever and additional transfusion.

Kinetics of Autologous Stem Cell Mobilization Failure: Comparison of AMD3100/G-CSF, G-CSF, GM-/G-CSF, and Chemotherapy/G-CSF on Remobilization Success.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3380-3380 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. DiPersio ◽  
Angela Smith ◽  
Dianne Sempek ◽  
Albert Baker ◽  
Steven Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease State ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Kinetics Of

Abstract Background: No standard approach for the mobilization of peripheral hematologic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) has been established. High levels of circulating CD34+ cells, a surrogate marker for mobilization efficiency, are associated with less apheresis days. A higher dose of CD34+ cell transfused after high-dose chemotherapy decreases time to hematologic recovery. Consequently, a better understanding of variables associated with mobilization kinetics may further optimize stem cell collection and reduce complications associated with autologous stem cell transplants. Methods: The Washington University (St. Louis, MO) transplantation database includes clinical parameters from 407 multiple myeloma (MM), 567 non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL), and 164 Hodgkin’s disease (HD) pts who received an ASCT between 1995 and 2006. A retrospective analysis of this large pt population was conducted to determine factors associated with the mobilization kinetics of CD34+ cells. Results: Figure 1 summarizes the mobilization kinetics as defined by number of days to reach a target of 2 × 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg. Overall, the median number of aphereses to reach the target were 1, 2, and 2 in MM, NHL, and HD, respectively. Daily median CD34+ yields in MM pts were 3.8, 1.2, and 0.5 × 10^6 on day 1–3, respectively. In NHL pts, yields were 1.4, 0.8, and 0.4 × 10^6 on day 1–3. In HD pts, yields were 1.8, 0.8, and 0.3 × 10^6 on day 1–3, respectively. The addition of chemotherapy increased the % of pts requiring only a single apheresis to reach the mobilization target. Figure 2 summarizes the mobilization kinetics for each re-mobilization regimen. In general, a limited number of cells was collected with each aphereses; >70% of pts failed to mobilize 2 × 10^6 CD34+ cells/kg. In contrast, remobilization with AMD3100 allowed the collection of sufficient CD34+ cells in 67% of pts; median number of apheresis to reach the target was 3. Conclusions: Factors associated with mobilization kinetics of CD34+ cells include disease state and mobilization regimen. Re-mobilization is associated with high failure rates, re-mobilization regimens including AMD3100 are more successful. Figure 1: Mobilization kinetics by disease state Figure 1:. Mobilization kinetics by disease state Figure 2: Mobilization kinetics by re-mobilization regimen Figure 2:. Mobilization kinetics by re-mobilization regimen

DCEP (Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Cisplatin) Followed by High-Dose G-CSF Is a Highly Efficient and Safe Regimen for Stem Cell Mobilization for Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3284-3284
Author(s):  
Jason P. Gonsky ◽  
Nikoletta Lendvai ◽  
Michele L. Donato ◽  
Scott D. Rowley ◽  
Andrew L. Pecora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Yield ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Stem Cell Rescue ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract High dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue remains a standard therapy for multiple myeloma patients who can tolerate it. A mobilizing regimen for multiple myeloma should ideally allow for a high yield of CD34+ cells, provide anti-myeloma activity, be well tolerated, and have predictable kinetics regarding initiation of collection of stem cells. Higher numbers of infused autologous CD34+ cells allow for more rapid engraftment and lower incidence of transplant-related morbidity and mortality. The goal for patients with myeloma is to harvest enough CD34+ cells to provide at least two autologous transplants. Previous mobilization regimens utilized G-CSF alone or high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. However, high-dose cyclophosphamide (4–7g/m2) has only modest efficacy against myeloma and is associated with significant morbidity and up to 1–2% treatment-related mortality. DCEP (dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, cisplatin) is a well established regimen with good efficacy as salvage treatment for myeloma. Additionally, the use of DCEP with G-CSF for mobilization in myeloma has previously been reported to provide an average yield of approximately 6x106 CD34+ cells. We report our experience with DCEP and high-dose G-CSF in mobilizing 88 multiple myeloma patients since 2006. Our regimen consisted of 40 mg dexamethasone IV over 15 minutes x 4 days, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2, etoposide 40 mg/m2 (capped at 75 mg), and cisplatin 15 mg/m2 (capped at 25 mg), all continuous IV infusions over 24h x 4 days, with G-CSF starting 24–48h after completion of chemotherapy, administered SQ at 5 mcg/kg x 6 days followed by 10 mcg/kg daily until pheresis is completed. Over 80% of our patients were ready to initiate collection on day 14. Our goal for collection is 10–12x106 CD34+ cells to allow for two or three transplants using at least 4x106 CD34+ cells per transplant. Yields were excellent with a mean yield of 27x106 CD34+ cells, with a range of 7.3–130.5x106 CD34+ cells. 37/88 (42%) of patients required only one day of pheresis, with a mean yield of 34x106 CD34+ cells. 38/88 (43%) of patients required two days of pheresis. Only 15% of patients required more than two days of pheresis. Only 3 patients yielded fewer than 10x106 CD34+ cells (3%), and none yielded fewer than 5x106 CD34+ cells. In conclusion, this regimen is highly efficacious, offers excellent stem cell yields and predictable collection kinetics, can be administered on an outpatient basis, and is safe and well tolerated.

Results and Cost Effectiveness of "on-Demand" Plerixafor Added to Chemotherapy and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4305-4305
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Milone ◽  
Massimo Martino ◽  
Annalia Di Marco ◽  
Salvatore Leotta ◽  
Andrea Spadaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
High Dose ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Optimal Harvest ◽  
Increase In Probability ◽  
Cell Mobilization ◽  
Pbsc Mobilization

Abstract The failure of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization and harvest is a critical issue for multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Plerixafor (PLX) is an effective mobilizing agent; however, its use for every MM patient undergoing high-dose chemotherapy has led to a notable increase in costs. We designed a highly specific and sensitive algorithm for identifying patients likely to fail PBSC mobilization after chemotherapy and G-CSF (Blood Transfusion 2013.11:94). The use of this algorithm thereby allows selective administration of PLX to patients predicted to fail mobilization after chemotherapy and G-CSF (on-demand PLX) and may reduce failure rate of PBSC mobilization while limiting cost. We performed a multicenter phase II prospective study of on-demand PLX used according to our algorithm for patients with lymphoma or MM, who were mobilized by cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. The study was powered to demonstrate a reduction in mobilization failure from 14% to 7% for the entire population of treated patients. Here, we report the final results for MM patients. The inclusion criteria for MM patients were as follows: diagnosis of symptomatic MM, age 18-70 yr, achievement of any response after first-line treatment administered for 4-8 months, first mobilization attempt, cardiac and pulmonary function adequate for high-dose chemotherapy. Mobilization schedule was cyclophosphamide (CTX, 4 g/m2) and G-CSF (5-10 mcg/Kg), PLX (240 mcg/Kg) was administered only to patients selected by the algorithm. Estimation of costs was performed according to a previously reported study (BJH 2014, 164, 113). There were 111 patients with MM who underwent treatment. Successful CD34+ cell mobilization (>20×109 cells/mL in PB) was achieved for 97.2% (108/111) of patients, and failure of mobilization occurred in the remaining 3 (2.8%); minimal apheretic harvest success (>2.0×106 CD34+ cells/Kg) was achieved for 97.2% (108/111); and optimal harvest success (=/>4.0×106 CD34+ cells/Kg) was achieved for 84.6% (94/111). On-demand PLX was needed for 8.2% of patients (9/111). After autologous hematopoietic transplantation, neutrophil (N) engraftment (N>0.5x109 cells/L) was reached at day +11.8 (range day +8 to +24). We compared these prospective results with the mobilization results obtained retrospectively in a control group of 183 MM patients who received the same mobilization schedule without PLX. After the two groups were adjusted for unbalanced factors, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that on-demand PLX treatment according to the algorithm led to significant increases in the probabilities of achieving a successful minimal apheretic harvest (p=0.006; hazard ratio [HR] 5.624, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.168-19.548) and optimal harvest (p=0.02; HR 2.121, 95% CI 1.118-4.025). The mean cost increase for the first mobilization in the PLX-on-demand prospective study, in respect to control group, was 615 €/patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as: (cost1-cost2)/(result1-result2). ICER was 47 €/1% increase in probability of a minimal apheretic harvest while it was 68 €/1% increase in probability of an optimal apheretic harvest. In conclusion, the final analysis of our study found that on-demand PLX for MM patients, which was added to the mobilization schedule of CTX (4 g/m2) + G-CSF (5-10 mcg/Kg), allowed a successful harvest from the first mobilization treatment in > 97% of patients, with 85% of patients achieving a harvest sufficient for two rounds of high-dose chemotherapy. These results indicate that on-demand PLX added to mobilization chemotherapy is a significant improvement over the same type of mobilization chemotherapy without PLX. The limited use of PLX in this study allowed for a favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this expensive agent. On-demand PLX used according to a validated algorithm in addition to CTX plus G-CSF may be considered a new standard for PBSC mobilization and harvest in patients with MM. Table 1.Failure of CD34+ Mobilization in PB Failure of Minimal Harvest Failure of Optimal Harvest Cost per PatientICER (Minimal Harvest)ICER (Optimal Harvest)PLX on Demand (n 111)2.8%2.8%15.4%3,969 €47 €/ 1% increase in probability of a Minimal Harvest68 €/ 1% increase in probability of an Optimal HarvestControl Cohort (n 183)7.6%15.8%24.4%3,354 €P (adjusted for comparisons)NS0.0060.02 Disclosures Milone: Sanofi: Consultancy. Martino:Sanofi: Consultancy. Olivieri:Sanofi: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document