Patterns of Tocilizumab Use Among Myeloma Patients Receiving Bcma-Directed Therapies: Effect on Day 30 Outcomes

INTRODUCTION: Tocilizumab (toci) is often used to manage cytokine release syndrome (CRS) associated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) and T-cell engager (TCE) therapies, including therapies targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Whether CRS development or early time-to-toci (defined as initial tocilizumab within 12 hours of CRS onset) impact 30-day outcomes is unknown. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult RRMM patients at our institution who received anti-BCMA CAR-T or TCE therapy. METHODS: We reviewed all RRMM patients who received CAR-T/TCE therapy between 7/1/2017 and 6/30/2020. Time-to-CRS was defined as the first temperature ≥ 38°C without clear alternate etiology. CRS resolution was defined as the first timepoint marking defervescence lasting ≥ 24 hours or hospital discharge, whichever was sooner. For patients who developed CRS, we recorded initial and peak CRS grades using consensus criteria (Lee 2019), relevant biomarkers, time of first toci administration, and usage of corticosteroids/anakinra. We also recorded neurotoxicity, persistent neutropenia, and macrophage activation syndrome (MAS)-like features. Patients were categorized into three groups: no toci, early time-to-toci (first dose ≤ 12 hours of CRS onset), and late time-to-toci (first dose > 12 hours of CRS onset). We used logistic regression to predict objective response (≥ partial response [PR] at 30 days, IMWG criteria) and linear regression to predict CRS duration, with covariates including CAR-T/TCE product identity, time-to-CRS, and time-to-toci. RESULTS: Of the 70 RRMM patients, 14 (20%) received TCE therapy and 56 (80%) received CAR-T therapies; 60 (87%) experienced CRS and 50 (72%) received toci (Figure 1). Of note, 24 patients also received dexamethasone and 11 patients received anakinra while hospitalized. Development of CRS was strongly associated with achievement of ≥ PR by Day 30 (odds ratio [OR] 13.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-118). Patients who achieved a ≥ PR at Day 30 had shorter time-to-CRS intervals compared to non-responders (median 11.4 vs 26 hours, p=0.03). Among patients who developed CRS, time-to-CRS <24 hours was associated with achieving ≥ PR by Day 30 (OR 5.76, 95% CI 2.0-16.5). Of the 50 patients who received toci, 24 (48%) had early time-to-toci (≤ 12 hours) while 26 (52%) had late time-to-toci. Thirty-day response rates were similar between groups (71% early vs 69% late, p=1.0). Among the 48 patients with CRS lasting > 12 hours, receiving toci within 12 hours of CRS onset was associated with shorter total CRS duration (median 45 hours vs 56 hours, p=0.04). Patients who developed MAS-like features and/or neurotoxicity had somewhat lower time-to-toci intervals compared to patients who developed neither (MAS patients median time-to-toci 11.8 hours vs 16.9 hours, p = 0.59; neurotoxicity patients time to toci 12 hours vs 18.3 hours, p=0.15); however, these differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: In RRMM patients receiving CAR-T/TCE therapy, the development of CRS is associated with achieving ≥ PR at Day 30. Furthermore, responders develop CRS earlier than non-responders. Among patients who develop CRS, early time-to-toci is associated with proportionately shorter CRS duration and does not appear to affect short-term responses, or development of MAS or neurotoxicity. Limitations of our analysis include its retrospective nature with heterogeneity between products and provider decision-making. Our results suggest that early time-to-toci may shorten CRS duration and potentially length of hospitalization. These hypothesis-generating findings warrant validation with longer follow-up. Additionally, prospective protocols implementing early or pre-emptive toci administration, similar to a published approach in lymphoma patients (Gardner 2019), warrant consideration in the RRMM population as well. Disclosures Wolf: Adaptive: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Martin:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; AMGEN: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Wong:Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fortis: Research Funding. Shah:BMS, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma, Teneobio, Poseida, Nektar: Research Funding; GSK, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi, BMS, CareDx, Kite, Karyopharm: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: tocilizumab is an IL-6 receptor antagonist that is currently indicated and FDA approved for: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Adult patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to one or more Disease- Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) Adult patients with giant cell arteritis. Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (PJIA) Patients 2 years of age and older with active polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SJIA) Patients 2 years of age and older with active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) Adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell-induced severe or life-threatening cytokine release syndrome.

Download Full-text

B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells (CART-BCMA) for Multiple Myeloma (MM): Initial Safety and Efficacy from a Phase I Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1147.1147 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1147-1147 ◽

Cited By ~ 51

Author(s):

Adam D. Cohen ◽

Alfred L. Garfall ◽

Edward A Stadtmauer ◽

Simon Francis Lacey ◽

Eric Lancaster ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Flow Cytometry ◽

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

Depth Of Response ◽

Car T ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background : BCMA is expressed on MM cells, and CAR T cells targeting BCMA have pre-clinical anti-MM activity. CART-BCMA is an autologous T cell product engineered by lentiviral transduction to express a fully human BCMA-specific CAR with CD3ζ and 4-1BB signaling domains, and then expanded ex vivo using CD3/CD28 beads. Methods: In this ongoing, 3+3 dose-escalation study, relapsed/refractory MM patients (pts) receive CART-BCMA cells as split-dose infusions (10% on day 0, 30% on day 1, and 60% on day 2). Three cohorts are planned: 1) 1-5 x 108 CART cells alone; 2) cyclophosphamide (CTX) 1.5 g/m2 + 1-5 x 107 CART cells; and 3) CTX 1.5 g/m2 + 1-5 x 108 CART cells. Pts need serum creatinine (Cr) <2.5 mg/dL or Cr clearance≥30 ml/min, and adequate hepatic, cardiac, and pulmonary function. BCMA expression on MM cells is analyzed by flow cytometry, though no pre-specified level is required for eligibility. CART-BCMA frequency and activation status are assessed in blood and marrow by flow cytometry. Levels of CAR-transduced cells are also measured by qPCR using a transgene-specific primer/probe pair. Soluble BCMA, BAFF and APRIL levels in serum are assessed by ELISA. Bioactivity of the infusion product and CART-related cytokine release syndrome are analyzed by Luminex. Responses are assessed by IMWG criteria. Results: To date, 11 pts have been screened, and 6 treated in cohort 1. Reasons for not receiving treatment were screen fail (n=2), rapid MM progression/renal failure (n=2), and pt/MD choice (n=1). The 6 treated pts were all IMID/PI-refractory with high risk cytogenetics and median 9 lines of therapy (Table). All expressed BCMA on MM cells, and achieved the minimum target dose of 1x108 CART-BCMA cells. All but 2 received 100% of planned dose, with 2 (pts 01and 03) receiving 40% (3rd infusions held for fever). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 5 patients: 2 grade 3 requiring tocilizumab (pts 01 and 03), 1 grade 2, and 2 grade 1. High-grade CRS was associated with elevated levels of IL-6, IFNg, MCP1, MIG, IL2Ra, and IL-10, as seen in our acute lymphoblastic leukemia CTL019 trial (Teachey et al, 2016). There was 1 DLT: grade 4 PRES (posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome) in pt 03, with severe delirium, recurrent seizures, obtundation, and cerebral edema on MRI. This resolved after anti-epileptics, high-dose methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide, without long-term neurologic sequelae. Other grade 3/4 toxicities to date include hypophosphatemia (n=3 pts), hypocalcemia (n=2), and anemia, neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypofibrinogenemia, fatigue, pneumonia, UTI, elevated Alk phos and AST, hypokalemia, hypertension, and pleural effusion (n=1 each). CART-BCMA cells were detected in blood and marrow by CAR-specific PCR in all 6 pts, and in 4/6 by flow cytometry, with 2 pts, 01 and 03, having massive CART expansion peaking at 90% and 76% of peripheral CD3+ T cells, respectively. CART-BCMA cells during peak expansion were predominantly CD8+ and highly activated. Pt 01 has ongoing CART-BCMA persistence, with ongoing stringent CR at 7 months and MRD-negative bone marrow by flow cytometry. Pt 03, who had pleural and possible dural MM involvement, had CART-BCMA cells found in pleural fluid and CSF, and achieved VGPR (IF+ only) with resolution of extramedullary disease on PET/CT scan. She progressed at 5 months, associated with significant reduction of CART-BCMA cells and loss of BCMA expression on her MM cells by flow cytometry, suggestive of antigen escape. Two pts (02, 11) had modest CART-BCMA expansion, with 1 minimal response (MR) lasting 2 months, and 1 ongoing MR 1 month post-infusion. Two pts (09, 10) had minimal expansion and no response. Soluble BCMA levels, which were elevated in all pts at baseline, declined in parallel with CART-BCMA expansion and correlated with depth of response, with an accompanying increase in previously suppressed BAFF and APRIL levels in serum. Conclusions: CART-BCMA cells can be manufactured from heavily-pretreated MM pts, and demonstrate promising in vivo expansion and clinical activity, even without lymphodepleting conditioning. Depth of response correlates with degree of CART-BCMA expansion and CRS. Toxicities to date include CRS and in 1 pt, severe reversible neurotoxicity, as described in other CAR T cell studies. Expanded accrual in cohort 1, as well as in cohorts with CTX conditioning, is ongoing, with updated data to be presented at the meeting. Table Table. Disclosures Cohen: Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy. Garfall:Bioinvent: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy. Stadtmauer:Novartis: Consultancy; Takada: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Lancaster:Janssen: Consultancy; Medimmune, Inc.: Consultancy; Grifols, Inc.: Other: Teaching courses. Vogl:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding. Ambrose:Novartis: Research Funding. Plesa:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Kulikovskaya:Novartis: Research Funding. Weiss:Prothena: Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations. Richardson:Novartis: Employment, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Isaacs:Novartis: Employment. Melenhorst:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Levine:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. June:Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: Immunology, Research Funding; University of Pennsylvania: Patents & Royalties; Tmunity: Equity Ownership, Other: Founder, stockholder ; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celldex: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Immune Design: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Pfizer: Honoraria. Milone:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) after Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cell Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CLL

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1983.1983 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1983-1983 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

David L. Porter ◽

Simon F. Lacey ◽

Wei-Ting Hwang ◽

Pamela Shaw ◽

Noelle V. Frey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Grading System ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

Car T ◽

Life Threatening ◽

Guide Intervention

Abstract CTL019 are autologous T cells genetically modified to express a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) consisting of an external anti-CD19 domain with the CD3z and 4-1BB signaling domains, and mediate potent anti-tumor effects in patients (pts) with advanced, R/R CLL, ALL and NHL. CRS is the most serious toxicity of CTL019 therapy; symptoms can include fevers, nausea, myalgias, capillary leak, hypoxia, and hypotension. Standard CRS grading criteria are not applicable to CAR T cell therapies. To better capture clinical manifestations of CRS and guide intervention after CTL019, we devised a novel CRS grading scale. that was applied to 40 pts treated with CTL019 for R/R CLL; 14 pts on an initial pilot and 26 pts on an ongoing dose-optimization trial (reported separately). Our new CRS grading system is shown below. Pts were 80% male, a median age of 65 (range 51-78) and received a median of 4 prior therapies (range 1-10). 41% had known mutation at p53. 83% of 24 pts tested had unmutated IgVH. Response rate to CTL019 (CR+PR) was 42%. CRS was the major toxicity and occurred in 57% (23/40) of pts. CRS was gr 1 in 10%, gr 2 in 17%, gr 3 in 15% and gr 4 in 15%. Development of CRS correlated with response; 13/23 (57%) pts with CRS responded versus 4/17 (24%) pts without CRS responded (p=0.05). CRS was associated with elevations in IL-6, IFN-g, and other cytokines; details for 33 pts will be presented. Peak fold-increase over baseline for IL-6 was a median of 10.6x (range 0.28–649) and for IFN- g a median of 32.9x (1–7243x). For pts with CRS, this increase in IL-6 was a median of 23.5x compared to 1.86x in pts without CRS (p=0.001); and in IFN- g was a median of 97.2xin pts with CRS compared to 24.2x without (p=0.018). Increasing CRS severity was associated with peak fold change in IL-6 (p< 0.0001) and IFN- g (p=0.015). Notably, unlike cytokine changes associated with sepsis, TNF-a did not markedly increase during CRS. CRS occurred with a consistent and often dramatic increase in ferritin, C reactive protein (CRP), and hemophagocytosis, suggesting concurrent macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). Increasing CRS severity was associated with an increasing trend for peak ferritin (log scale, p<0.001) and peak CRP (p<0.001). The median peak ferritin was 13,463 ng/ml in pts with CRS compared to 378 in pts without (p<0.001). Median peak CRP was 16 mg/dl in pts with CRS compared to 3.86 in pts without (p=0.002). CRS required intervention in 8 pts. 1 pt was successfully treated with corticosteroids. Given marked increases in IL-6, 7 patients received the IL6-receptor antagonist tocilizumab with or without corticosteroids with resolution of CRS. Tocilizumab was given to 1/7 pts with gr 2 CRS, 1/6 pts with gr 3 and 5/6 pts with gr 4. Several pts also received corticosteroids and/or etanercept. All pts had resolution of CRS signs with no TRM from CRS. CRS is the most significant complication of CTL019 and can be life threatening. A novel CRS grading system was needed to identify CRS severity more accurately guide intervention timing. CTL019-related CRS is associated with a unique cytokine profile and has been manageable with anti-cytokine therapy in pts with R/R CLL. CRS appears to correlate with response of CLL to CTL019. Further study is needed to develop reliable methods to predict severity and minimize CRS toxicity without inhibiting anti-leukemia activity of CTL019. New CRS Grading System for CTL019 Abstract 1983. Table Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Mild: Treated with supportive care such as anti-pyretics, anti-emetics Moderate: Requiring IV therapies or parenteral nutrition; some signs of organ dysfunction (i.e. gr 2 Cr or gr 3 LFTs) related to CRS and not attributable to any other condition. Hospitalization for management of CRS related symptoms including fevers with associated neutropenia. More severe: Hospitalization required for management of symptoms related to organ dysfunction including gr 4 LFTs or gr 3 Cr related to CRS and not attributable to any other conditions; this excludes management of fever or myalgias. Includes hypotension treated with IV fluids or low-dose pressors, coagulopathy requiring FFP or cryoprecipitate, and hypoxia requiring supplemental O2 (nasal cannula oxygen, high flow 02, CPAP or BiPAP). Pts admitted for management of suspected infection due to fevers and/or neutropenia may have gr 2 CRS. Life-threatening complications such as hypotension requiring “high dose pressors”, hypoxia requiring mechanical ventilation. Disclosures Porter: Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Genentech (spouse employment): Employment. Off Label Use: Use of genetically modified T cells (CTL019) to treat CLL and use of tocilizumab to treat cytokine release syndrome.. Lacey:Novartis: Research Funding. Hwang:NVS: Research Funding. Frey:Novartis: Research Funding. Chew:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Chen:Novartis: Research Funding. Kalos:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gonzalez:Novartis: Research Funding. Melenhorst:Novartis: Research Funding. Litchman:Novartis: Employment. Shen:Novartis: Employment. Quintas-Cardamas:Novartis: Employment. Wood:Novartis Pharma: Employment. Levine:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. June:Novartis: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Grupp:Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Anakinra Targeting Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-150592 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2812-2812

Author(s):

Sandy W. Wong ◽

Shambavi Richard ◽

Yi Lin ◽

Deepu Madduri ◽

Carolyn C. Jackson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

T Cell ◽

Receptor Antagonist ◽

Chimeric Antigen Receptor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

Cell Therapies ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T

Abstract Introduction: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a common toxicity associated with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies. Corticosteroids and steroid-sparing therapies such as tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist, and anakinra, an interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, have been used to reduce the incidence and severity of these toxicities. Preclinical and clinical case studies of anakinra, administered subcutaneously or intravenously at various doses, have shown promising results in the management of CRS and systemic inflammatory responses resembling hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)/macrophage activation syndrome (MAS). In CARTITUDE-1, CRS occurred in 95% of heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a CAR T-cell therapy with 2 B-cell maturation antigen-targeting single-domain antibodies (Berdeja et al. Lancet 2021). Per protocol, tocilizumab was required to manage CRS with option to give steroids and/or anakinra per investigator discretion. Here, we report the institutional experiences of anakinra use in the management of CRS in patients who have received cilta-cel as part of the CARTITUDE-1 study. Methods: Eligible patients had MM and received ≥3 prior therapies or were refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody (Berdeja et al. Lancet 2021). After apheresis, bridging therapy was permitted. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×10 6 CAR+ viable T cells/kg; range 0.5-1.0×10 6) 5-7 days after lymphodepletion (300 mg/m 2 cyclophosphamide, 30 mg/m 2 fludarabine daily for 3 days). Lee et al (Blood 2014) grading criteria for CRS were mapped to the ASTCT criteria for CRS. Post-hoc analysis of data revealed use of anakinra at some sites in patients who failed to respond to the initial management of CRS with tocilizumab +/- dexamethasone or in clinical settings where rise of ferritin and/or liver function tests were indicative for continued HLH/MAS-like manifestations (Kennedy et al. ASH 2020). Results: Of 97 patients in CARTITUDE-1, CRS occurred in 92 (95%) patients; 4% were grade 3/4. The median time to onset was 7 days (range 1-12) and median duration was 4 days (range 1-14). Supportive measures to treat CRS were administered to 91% of patients, most commonly tocilizumab (69%; 4 patients received ≥3 doses), corticosteroids (22%), and anakinra (18 patients, 19%). CRS resolved in 99% of patients. Anakinra was administered after initial tocilizumab and within the first 48 hours (range 0-6 days) of CRS onset for the majority of patients as part of effective management of CRS. Anakinra was administered at a dose of 100-200 mg every 8-12 hours over a median of 2.5 days (range 1-15 days). CRS uniformly resolved following anakinra use in CARTITUDE-1, apart from one patient who died from sepsis (grade 5 outcome) due to HLH/MAS considered related to treatment (Table). Conclusions: CRS events in cilta-cel-treated patients in CARTITUDE-1 were common, generally low-grade, and successfully managed with standard tocilizumab +/- dexamethasone. The use of anakinra should be considered in patients with persistent CRS/inflammatory symptoms despite tocilizumab use, and in particular in patients with HLH/MAS-like symptoms/phenotype occurring following CRS or in the absence of prior CRS. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wong: Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; GloxoSmithKlein: Research Funding; Dren Biosciences: Consultancy; Caelum: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richard: Karyopharm, Janssen: Honoraria. Lin: Juno: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sorrento: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Vineti: Consultancy. Madduri: Janssen: Current Employment. Jackson: Janssen: Current Employment; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Consultancy. Zudaire: Janssen: Current Employment. Romanov: Janssen: Current Employment. Trigg: Janssen: Current Employment. Vogel: Janssen Global Services, LLC: Current Employment, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Garrett: Legend Biotech USA: Current Employment. Nesheiwat: Legend Biotech USA: Current Employment. Martin: Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding. Jagannath: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Legend Biotech: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: At the time of abstract submission, cilta-cel is being investigated for the treatment of multiple myeloma but is not yet approved

Download Full-text

CAR-T Therapy for Lymphoma with Prophylactic Tocilizumab: Decreased Rates of Severe Cytokine Release Syndrome without Excessive Neurologic Toxicity

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-143114 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 30-31 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Paolo F Caimi ◽

Ashish Sharma ◽

Patricio Rojas ◽

Seema Patel ◽

Jane Reese ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Car T

INTRODUCTION: Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells have demonstrated activity against relapsed/refractory lymphomas. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and CAR-T related encephalopathy syndrome (CRES/ICANS) are well-known complications of CAR-T cell therapy. Tocilizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin 6 (IL-6) receptor, is approved for treatment of CRS. Our institutional standard was modified to administer prophylactic tocilizumab before infusion CAR-T cell products. We present the outcomes of subjects treated with locally manufactured antiCD19 CAR-T cells (TNFRSF19 transmembrane domain, CD3Zeta/4-1BB costimulatory signaling) with and without prophylactic tocilizumab. METHODS: Relapsed / refractory (r/r) lymphoma patients (pts) treated with anti-CD19 CAR-T cells at our institution were included. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as laboratory results were obtained from our Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Therapy Database. Prior to institution of prophylactic tocilizumab, pts received this agent only if they presented evidence of CRS grade 2 or higher. In May 2019, our institutional practice changed to provide tocilizumab 8mg/kg, 1 hour prior to infusion of CAR-T cell product. CRS was measured according to the ASTCT Consensus Grading, whereas CRES was measured using the CARTOX-10 criteria. Comparisons between groups were done with the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: Twenty-three relapsed / refractory lymphoma pts were treated with antiCD19 CAR-T cells; 15 pts received prophylactic tocilizumab. Median follow up was 312 days (range 64 - 679) days. Baseline characteristics are listed in table 1. Both groups were similar: There were no statistically differences in the rate of bulky, refractory disease, prior ASCT or number or prior lines of therapy. Baseline lymphocyte counts, C - reactive protein (CRP) and were also comparable between groups (Table 2). We did not observe immune adverse reactions to tocilizumab infusion. There were no differences in the incidence of cytopenias or infectious complications between groups. CRS of any grade was observed in 6/8 (75%) of pts without prophylactic tocilizumab vs. 6/15 (40%) in pts treated with prophylactic tocilizumab (p = 0.23), whereas CRS grade >1 was observed in 5 pts (62.5%) without prophylactic tocilizumab and in 3 pts (20%) treated with prophylactic tocilizumab (p = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of all grade CRES (no prophylaxis, 3/8 [38%] pts; prophylaxis 5/15 [30%] pts, p = 0.2969). There was a statistically significant difference in the peak CRP and peak ferritin without difference in the peak lymphocyte count after CAR-T infusion (Table 2, Figure 1). Patients given prophylactic tocilizumab had higher IL-6 plasma concentrations on day 2 after infusion (Figure 2). Complete response was observed in 4/8 (50%) pts without prophylactic tocilizumab vs. 12/15 (80%) pts with prophylactic tocilizumab (p = 0.18). All pts had detectable Anti-CD19 CAR-T cells on day 30, both groups had peak CAR-T expansion on day 14, with no statistically significant differences in expansion rates between groups. All evaluable subjects have had CAR-T persistence on days 60, 90, 180, and 365. CONCLUSIONS: Use of prophylactic tocilizumab prior to infusion of antiCD19 CAR-T cells is associated with reduced incidence of severe CRS and decreased levels of clinical laboratory markers of inflammation, despite increases in plasma concentration of IL-6. This decreased rate of grade ≥2 CRS is not associated with impaired disease control and did not result in increased rates of neurologic toxicity. Prophylactic tocilizumab does not appear to affect CAR-T cell expansion or persistence. Figure 1 Disclosures Caimi: ADC therapeutics: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Bayer: Other: Advisory Board; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board; Kite pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board. Worden:Lentigen, a Miltenyi biotec company: Current Employment. Kadan:Lentigen, a Miltenyi biotec company: Current Employment. Orentas:Lentigen Technology, a Miltenyi Biotec Company: Research Funding. Dropulic:Lentigen, a Miltenyi Biotec Company: Current Employment, Patents & Royalties: CAR-T immunotherapy. de Lima:Celgene: Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Personal fees, advisory board, Research Funding; Kadmon: Other: Personal Fees, Advisory board; Incyte: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board; BMS: Other: Personal Fees, advisory board. OffLabel Disclosure: Use of tocilizumab as prophylaxis for CRS is not approved, whereas use for treatment is approved and on label.

Download Full-text

Precision Co-Targeting of the Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin Receptor in Childhood CRLF2-Rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148602 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1705-1705

Author(s):

Asen Bagashev ◽

Joseph Patrick Loftus ◽

Savannah Ross ◽

Lisa M Niswander ◽

Haiying Qin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

Car T ◽

Leukemia Relapse ◽

Cell Functionality ◽

Pdx Models

Abstract Introduction : Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) is associated with high rates of chemoresistance and relapse. CRLF2 (cytokine receptor-like factor 2) rearrangements occur in 50% of Ph-like and 60% of Down Syndrome (DS)-associated ALL and induce constitutive JAK/STAT and other kinase signaling. Current clinical trials are studying chemotherapy with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like ALL, but results are not yet known. While chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) immunotherapies have induced remarkable remissions in children with relapsed/refractory B-ALL, approximately 50% of CD19CART-treated patients will relapse again, many with CD19 antigen loss. New therapies are needed to prevent relapse and overcome immunotherapeutic resistance. Methods : We previously developed CAR T cells targeting the thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR; encoded by CRLF2) and demonstrated potent preclinical activity in Ph-like ALL models (Qin Blood 2015), which has led to a soon-to-open phase 1 clinical trial for patients with relapsed/refractory CRLF2-overexpressing ALL. In the current preclinical studies, we hypothesized that combinatorial targeting with bispecific TSLPRxCD19CART or TSLPRxCD22CART (Ross Cancer Res 2020) or with TSLPRCART + ruxolitinib will have superior activity against CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like and DS-ALL. Results : TSLPRCART treatment of CRLF2-rearranged ALL cell line (n=1) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models potently inhibited leukemia proliferation in vitro and in vivo and induced long-term 'cure' of xenograft mice. However, co-administration of TSLPRCART + ruxolitinib markedly diminished in vivo T cell numbers, blunted cytokine production, and facilitated leukemia relapse, which could be abrogated by delaying ruxolitinib. Importantly, ruxolitinib co-treatment prevented severe TSLPRCART-induced cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and animal death. Interestingly, ruxolitinib withdrawal led to return of T-cell functionality with re-detection of TSLPRCART in peripheral blood, induction of IFN-γ production, and leukemia clearance upon CRLF2+ ALL rechallenge (Figure 1). Conclusions: In these preclinical studies, we report potent activity of TSLPRCART in cell line (n=1) and PDX models of childhood CRLF2-rearranged Ph-like ALL (n=2) and DS-ALL (n=2) and, interestingly, deleterious effects of concomitant JAK inhibition upon CAR T cell functionality. We demonstrated that ruxolitinib co-administration impaired in vivo TSLPRCART-induced ALL cell killing but was also beneficial in protection against life-threatening cytokine release syndrome in co-treated animals. Importantly, TSLPRCART was not eliminated, only suppressed, by JAKi co-treatment with restoration of T cell functionality upon ruxolitinib removal and/or leukemia relapse/rechallenge studies. Ongoing studies are defining optimal TSLPRCART + ruxolitinib sequence(s) to maximize both anti-leukemia efficacy and potential CRS mitigation, as well as assessing in vivo efficacy of bispecific TSLPRCARTs in CRLF2-R Ph-like ALL and DS-ALL PDX models for future translation and clinical evaluation in next-generation trials. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Fry: ElevateBio: Research Funding; Sana Biotechnology: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Tasian: Aleta Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Cytokine release syndrome and neurological event costs in lisocabtagene maraleucel–treated patients in the TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial

Blood Advances ◽

10.1182/bloodadvances.2020003531 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 5 (6) ◽

pp. 1695-1705

Author(s):

Jeremy S. Abramson ◽

Tanya Siddiqi ◽

Jacob Garcia ◽

Christine Dehner ◽

Yeonhee Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

T Cell ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Cytokine Release ◽

Cytokine Release Syndrome ◽

System Perspective ◽

Cell Therapies ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated high response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL); however, these therapies are associated with 2 CAR T cell–specific potentially severe adverse events (AEs): cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs). This study estimated the management costs associated with CRS/NEs among patients with relapsed/refractory LBCL using data from the pivotal TRANSCEND NHL 001 trial of lisocabtagene maraleucel, an investigational CD19-directed defined composition CAR T-cell product with a 4-1BB costimulation domain administered at equal target doses of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR+ T cells. This retrospective analysis of patients from TRANSCEND with prospectively identified CRS and/or NE episodes examined relevant trial-observed health care resource utilization (HCRU) associated with toxicity management based on the severity of the event from the health care system perspective. Cost estimates for this analysis were taken from publicly available databases and published literature. Of 268 treated patients as of April 2019, 127 (47.4%) experienced all-grade CRS and/or NEs, which were predominantly grade ≤2 (77.2%). Median total AE management costs ranged from $1930 (grade 1 NE) to $177 343 (concurrent grade ≥3 CRS and NE). Key drivers of cost were facility expenses, including intensive care unit and other inpatient hospitalization lengths of stay. HCRU and costs were significantly greater among patients with grade ≥3 AEs (22.8%). Therefore, CAR T-cell therapies with a low incidence of severe CRS/NEs will likely reduce HCRU and costs associated with managing patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. This clinical trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02631044.

Download Full-text

Automated Manufacture of Matched Donor-Derived Allogeneic CD19 CAR T-Cells for Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Toxicity, Efficacy and the Important Role of Lymphodepletion

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129640 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 776-776

Author(s):

Claire Roddie ◽

Maeve A O'Reilly ◽

Maria A V Marzolini ◽

Leigh Wood ◽

Juliana Dias Alves Pinto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T ◽

Peak Car ◽

Matched Donor

Introduction: 2nd generation CD19 CAR T cells show unprecedented efficacy in B-ALL, but several challenges remain: (1) scaling manufacture to meet patient need and (2) feasibility of generating products from lymphopenic patients post allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT). To overcome these issues we propose: (1) use of the CliniMACS Prodigy (Miltenyi Biotec), a semi-automated cGMP platform that simplifies CAR T cell manufacture and (2) the use of matched donor T cells to overcome the challenge posed by patient lymphopenia, albeit this may come with a heightened risk of graft versus host disease (GvHD). CARD (NCT02893189) is a Phase I study of matched donor derived CD19 CAR T cells generated on the CliniMACS Prodigy in 14 adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B ALL following allo-SCT. We additionally explore the requirement for lymphodepletion (LD) in the allogeneic CAR T cell setting and report on the incidence of GvHD with this therapy. Methods: Manufacturing: CARD utilises non-mobilised matched donor leucapheresate to manufacture 2nd generation CD19CAR T cells using a closed CliniMACS® Prodigy/ TransACTTM process. Study design: Eligible subjects are aged 16-70y with r/r B ALL following allo SCT. Study endpoints include feasibility of CD19CAR T cell manufacture from allo-SCT donors on the CliniMACS Prodigy and assessments of engraftment and safety including GvHD. To assess the requirement for LD prior to CD19CAR T cells in lymphopenic post-allo-SCT patients, the study is split into Cohort 1 (no LD) and Cohort 2 (fludarabine (30 mg/m2 x3) and cyclophosphamide (300mg/m2 x3)). To mitigate for the potential GvHD risk, cell dosing on study mirrors conventional donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) schedules and is based on total CD3+ (not CAR T) cell numbers: Dose 1=1x106/kg CD3+ T cells; Dose 2= 3x106/kg CD3+ T cells; Dose 3= 1x107/kg CD3+ T cells. Results: As of 26 July 2019, 17 matched allo SCT donors were leukapheresed and 16 products were successfully manufactured and QP released. Patient demographics are as follows: (1) median patient age was 43y (range 19-64y); (2) 4/17 had prior blinatumomab and 5/17 prior inotuzumab ozogamicin; (3) 7/17 had myeloablative allo SCT and 10/17 reduced intensity allo SCT of which 6/17 were sibling donors and 12/17 were matched unrelated donors. No patients with haploidentical transplant were enrolled. To date, 12/16 patients have received at least 1 dose of CD19CAR T cells: 7/16 on Cohort 1 and 5/16 on Cohort 2 (2/16 are pending infusion on Cohort 2 and 2/16 died of fungal infection prior to infusion). Median follow-up for all 12 patients is 22.9 months (IQR 2.9-25.9; range 0.7 - 25.9). At the time of CAR T cell infusion, 7/12 patients were in morphological relapse with >5% leukemic blasts. Despite this, CD19CAR T cells were administered safely: only 2/12 patients experienced Grade 3 CRS (UPenn criteria), both in Cohort 1, which fully resolved with Tocilizumab and corticosteroids. No patients experienced ≥Grade 3 neurotoxicity and importantly, no patients experienced clinically significant GvHD. In Cohort 1 (7 patients), median peak CAR expansion by flow was 87 CD19CAR/uL blood whereas in Cohort 2 (5 patients to date), median peak CAR expansion was 1309 CD19CAR/uL blood. This difference is likely to reflect the use of LD in Cohort 2. CAR T cell persistence by qPCR in Cohort 1 is short, with demonstrable CAR in only 2/7 treated patients at Month 2. Data for Cohort 2 is immature, but this will also be reported at the meeting in addition to potential mechanisms underlying the short persistence observed in Cohort 1. Of the 10 response evaluable patients (2/12 pending marrow assessment), 9/10 (90%) achieved flow/molecular MRD negative CR at 6 weeks. 2/9 responders experienced CD19 negative relapse (one at M3, one at M5) and 3/9 responders experienced CD19+ relapse (one at M3, one at M9, one at M12). 4/10 (40%) response evaluable patients remain on study and continue in flow/molecular MRD negative remission at a median follow up of 11.9 months (range 2.9-25.9). Conclusions: Donor-derived matched allogeneic CD19 CAR T cells are straightforward to manufacture using the CliniMACS Prodigy and deliver excellent early remission rates, with 90% MRD negative CR observed at Week 6 in the absence of severe CAR associated toxicity or GvHD. Peak CAR expansion appears to be compromised by the absence of LD and this may lead to a higher relapse rate. Updated results from Cohorts 1 and 2 will be presented. Disclosures Roddie: Novartis: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. O'Reilly:Kite Gilead: Honoraria. Farzaneh:Autolus Ltd: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Qasim:Autolus: Equity Ownership; Orchard Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; UCLB: Other: revenue share eligibility; Servier: Research Funding; Bellicum: Research Funding; CellMedica: Research Funding. Linch:Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Pule:Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Peggs:Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Identification of Two CAR T-Cell Populations Associated with Complete Response or Progressive Disease in Adult Lymphoma Patients Treated with Axi-Cel

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130815 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 779-779 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Zinaida Good ◽

Jay Y. Spiegel ◽

Bita Sahaf ◽

Meena B. Malipatlolla ◽

Matthew J. Frank ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Car T ◽

Scientific Advisory

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL). Long-term analysis of the ZUMA-1 phase 1-2 clinical trial showed that ~40% of Axi-cel patients remained progression-free at 2 years (Locke et al., Lancet Oncology 2019). Those patients who achieved a complete response (CR) at 6 months generally remained progression-free long-term. The biological basis for achieving a durable CR in patients receiving Axi-cel remains poorly understood. Here, we sought to identify CAR T-cell intrinsic features associated with CR at 6 months in DLBCL patients receiving commercial Axi-cel at our institution. Using mass cytometry, we assessed expression of 33 surface or intracellular proteins relevant to T-cell function on blood collected before CAR T cell infusion, on day 7 (peak expansion), and on day 21 (late expansion) post-infusion. To identify cell features that distinguish patients with durable CR (n = 11) from those who developed progressive disease (PD, n = 14) by 6 months following Axi-cel infusion, we performed differential abundance analysis of multiparametric protein expression on CAR T cells. This unsupervised analysis identified populations on day 7 associated with persistent CR or PD at 6 months. Using 10-fold cross-validation, we next fitted a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) model that identified two clusters of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 as potentially predictive of clinical outcome. The first cluster identified by our model was associated with CR at 6 months and had high expression of CD45RO, CD57, PD1, and T-bet transcription factor. Analysis of protein co-expression in this cluster enabled us to define a simple gating scheme based on high expression of CD57 and T-bet, which captured a population of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 with greater expansion in patients experiencing a durable CR (mean±s.e.m. CR: 26.13%±2.59%, PD: 10.99%±2.53%, P = 0.0014). In contrast, the second cluster was associated with PD at 6 months and had high expression of CD25, TIGIT, and Helios transcription factor with no CD57. A CD57-negative Helios-positive gate captured a population of CD4+ CAR T cells was enriched on day 7 in patients who experienced progression (CR: 9.75%±2.70%, PD: 20.93%±3.70%, P = 0.016). Co-expression of CD4, CD25, and Helios on these CAR T cells highlights their similarity to regulatory T cells, which could provide a basis for their detrimental effects. In this exploratory analysis of 25 patients treated with Axi-cel, we identified two populations of CD4+ CAR T cells on day 7 that were highly associated with clinical outcome at 6 months. Ongoing analyses are underway to fully characterize this dataset, to explore the biological activity of the populations identified, and to assess the presence of other populations that may be associated with CAR-T expansion or neurotoxicity. This work demonstrates how multidimensional correlative studies can enhance our understanding of CAR T-cell biology and uncover populations associated with clinical outcome in CAR T cell therapies. This work was supported by the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. Figure Disclosures Muffly: Pfizer: Consultancy; Adaptive: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy. Miklos:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite-Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AlloGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Bioscience: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi Biotech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Becton Dickinson: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mackall:Vor: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Roche: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Adaptimmune LLC: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Allogene: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apricity Health: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Unum Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Obsidian: Research Funding; Lyell: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Other: Founder, Research Funding; Nektar: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; PACT: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Bryologyx: Other: Scientific Advisory Board.

Download Full-text

Human CD83 Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell for the Prevention of Graft Versus Host Disease and Treatment of Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124031 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 196-196

Author(s):

Bishwas Shrestha ◽

Kelly Walton ◽

Jordan Reff ◽

Elizabeth M. Sagatys ◽

Nhan Tu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T ◽

Fund Research

Distinct from pharmacologic immunosuppression, we designed a programmed cytolytic effector T cell that prevents graft versus host disease (GVHD). CD83 is expressed on allo-activated conventional T cells (Tconv) and pro-inflammatory dendritic cells (DCs), which are implicated in GVHD pathogenesis. Therefore we developed a novel human CD83 targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell for GVHD prophylaxis. Here we demonstrate that human CD83 CAR T cells eradicate cell mediators of GVHD, significantly increase the ratio of regulatory T cells (Treg) to allo-activated Tconv, and provide lasting protection from xenogeneic GVHD. Further, we show human, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) expresses CD83 and can be targeted by CD83 CAR T cells. A 2nd generation CD83 CAR was generated with CD3ζ and 41BB costimulatory domain that was retrovirally transduced in human T cells to generate CD83 CAR T cells. The CD83 CAR construct exhibited a high degree of transduction efficiency of about 60%. The CD83 CAR T cells demonstrated robust IFN-γ and IL-2 production, killing, and proliferation when cultured with CD83+ target cells. To test whether human CD83 CAR T cells reduce alloreactivity in vitro, we investigated their suppressive function in allogeneic mixed leukocyte reactions (alloMLR). CD83 CAR T cells were added to 5-day alloMLRs consisting of autologous T cells and allogeneic monocyte-derived DCs at ratios ranging from 3:1 to 1:10. The CD83 CAR T cells potently reduced alloreactive T cell proliferation compared to mock transduced and CD19 CAR T cells. We identified that CD83 is differentially expressed on alloreactive Tconv, compared to Tregs. Moreover, the CD83 CAR T cell efficiently depletes CD83+ Tconv and proinflammatory DCs with 48 hours of engagement. To test the efficacy of human CD83 CAR T cells in vivo, we used an established xenogeneic GVHD model, where mice were inoculated with human PBMCs (25x106) and autologous CD83 CAR (1-10x106) or mock transduced T cells. The CD83 CAR T cells were well tolerated by the mice, and significantly improved survival compared to mock transduced T cells (Figure 1A). Mice treated with CD83 CAR T cells exhibited negligible GVHD target organ damage at day +21 (Figure 1B). Mice inoculated with CD83 CAR T cells demonstrated significantly fewer CD1c+, CD83+ DCs (1.7x106 v 6.2x105, P=0.002), CD4+, CD83+ T cells (4.8x103 v 5.8x102, P=0.005), and pathogenic Th1 cells (3.1x105 v 1.1x102, P=0.005) at day +21, compared to mice treated with mock transduced T cells. Moreover, the ratio of Treg to alloreactive Tconv (CD25+ non-Treg) was significantly increased among mice treated with CD83 CAR T cells (78 v 346, P=0.02), compared to mice injected with mock transduced T cells. Further, CD83 appears to be a promising candidate to target myeloid malignancies. We observed CD83 expression on malignant myeloid K562, Thp-1, U937, and MOLM-13 cells. Moreover, the CD83 CAR T cells effectively killed AML cell lines. Many AML antigens are expressed on progenitor stem cells. Thus, we evaluated for stem cell killing in human colony forming unit (CFU) assays, which demonstrated negligible on-target, off-tumor toxicity. Therefore, the human CD83 CAR T cell is an innovative cell-based approach to prevent GVHD, while providing direct anti-tumor activity against myeloid malignancies. Figure Disclosures Blazar: Kamon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Five Prime Therapeutics Inc: Co-Founder, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueRock Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie Inc: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-Founder; Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding; RXi Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics and BlueRock Therapeuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davila:Atara: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Bellicum: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Anixa: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Profiling T-Cell Receptor Diversity and Dynamics during Lymphoma Immunotherapy Using Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-141655 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 49-50

Author(s):

Navika D Shukla ◽

Alexander F. M. Craig ◽

Brian Sworder ◽

David M. Kurtz ◽

Charles Macaulay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Cell Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

T Cell Therapy ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T ◽

Tcr Repertoire ◽

Support Research

Background: Characterization of T-cell receptor (TCR) diversity and dynamics is increasingly critical to understanding therapeutic immune responses targeting tumors. Current TCR profiling methods generally require invasive tissue biopsies that capture a single snapshot of immune activity or are limited by the sheer diversity of the circulating TCR repertoire. In theory, T-cells with the greatest turnover could best reflect pivotal immune dynamics from both circulating and tissue-derived compartments, including non-circulating tissue-resident memory T-cells (Trm). To noninvasively capture such responses in the blood, we developed and benchmarked a high-throughput TCR profiling approach using plasma, optimized for the fragmented nature of cfDNA and the non-templated nature of rearranged TCRs. We then applied this method for residual disease monitoring in mature T-cell lymphomas (TCL) without circulating disease and for characterizing immune dynamics after anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR19) T-cell therapy of B-cell lymphomas with axicabtagene ciloleucel. Methods: We developed SABER (Sequence Affinity capture & analysis By Enumeration of cell-free Receptors) as a technique for TCR enrichment and analysis of fragmented rearrangements shed in cfDNA and applied this method using Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). We used SABER to profile a total of 381 samples (300 cfDNA and 81 PBMC samples) from 75 lymphoma patients and 18 healthy controls. After mapping sequencing reads (hg38) to identify candidate rearrangements within TCR loci, unique cfDNA fragments were resolved by a novel strategy to define consensus of unique molecular identifiers clustered by Levenshtein distances, followed by CDR3-anchoring for enumeration of final receptor clonotypes. SABER thus leverages information from fragmented TCRs, a critical requirement for cfDNA, to make V gene, CDR3, and J gene assignments after deduplication-mediated error-correction. We benchmarked SABER against established amplicon-based TCR-β targeted sequencing (LymphoTrack, Invivoscribe) and repertoire analysis methods (MiXCR; Bolotin et al, 2015 Nature Methods) when considering both cfDNA and PBMC samples from healthy adults and TCL patients. We assessed SABER performance for tracking clonal molecular disease in patients with mature TCLs from both cellular and cell-free circulating compartments (n=9). Malignant TCL clonotypes were identified in tumor specimens using clonoSEQ (Adaptive Biotechnologies). Finally, we evaluated TCR repertoire dynamics over time in 66 DLBCL patients after CAR19 T-cell therapy. Results: SABER demonstrated superior recovery of TCR clonotypes from cfDNA compared to both amplicon sequencing (LymphoTrack, Invivoscribe) and hybrid-capture methods when enumerating receptors using MiXCR (Fig. 1A). When applied to blood samples from TCL patients, SABER identified the malignant clonal TCR-β rearrangement in 8/9 (88.9%) cases, with significantly improved detection in cfDNA (p=0.015, Fig. 1B). Specifically, tumoral TCR clonotype was detectable only in cfDNA in 6 cases (75%), cfDNA-enriched in 1 case (12.5%), and detectable only in PBMCs in 1 case (12.5%). We applied SABER to monitor TCR repertoire dynamics in cfDNA after CAR T-cell therapy of patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL and observed increased T-cell turnover and repertoire expansion (greater total TCR-β clonotypes) (Fig. 1C). As early as 1-week after CAR19 infusion, TCR repertoire size was significantly correlated both with cellular CAR19 T-cell levels by flow cytometry (p=0.008) as well as with retroviral CAR19 levels in cfDNA (p=2.20e-07) suggesting faithful monitoring of CAR T-cell activity (Fig. 1D). TCR repertoire size one month after infusion was significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (HR 0.246, 95% CI 0.080-0.754, p=0.014). Conclusions: SABER has a favorable profile for cfDNA TCR repertoire capture when compared to existing methods and could thus have potential broad applicability to diverse disease contexts. Given the higher abundance of lymphoma-derived TCRs in cfDNA than intact circulating leukocytes, SABER holds promise for monitoring minimal residual disease in T-cell lymphomas. This approach also holds promise for monitoring T-cell repertoire changes including after CAR T-cell therapy and for predicting therapeutic responses. Disclosures Kurtz: Genentech: Consultancy; Foresight Diagnostics: Other: Ownership; Roche: Consultancy. Kim:Corvus: Research Funding; Eisai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Forty Seven Inc: Research Funding; Galderma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Horizon Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin Pharma: Research Funding; Medivir: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Research Funding; miRagen: Research Funding; Neumedicine: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Solingenix: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Mackall:Lyell Immunopharma: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; BMS: Consultancy; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Apricity Health: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company; Nektar Therapeutics: Consultancy; NeoImmune Tech: Consultancy. Miklos:Kite-Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotech: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Juno-Celgene-Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel support; Miltenyi Biotec: Research Funding. Diehn:Varian Medical Systems: Research Funding; Illumina: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; RefleXion: Consultancy; BioNTech: Consultancy. Khodadoust:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy. Alizadeh:Janssen: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Chugai: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Download Full-text