Blinatumomab for Patients with Richter's Syndrome: A Multicenter Phase 2 Trial from the Filo Group

Abstract Background Richter syndrome (RS) refers to the onset of aggressive lymphoma, mostly diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The outcome of RS patients is usually very poor with both low response rates to chemoimmunotherapy and short survival. While BCR and BCL2 inhibitors have transformed the management of CLL patients, these drugs do not prevent the onset of RS. Modulating anti-tumor immunity has recently been suggested as a promising approach in RS (Ding, 2017). Blinatumomab is a bi-specific T-cell engaging antibody construct that transiently links CD3-positive T cells to CD19-positive B-cells, inducing T-cell activation and subsequent lysis of tumor cells. It has been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory B-ALL and has also been evaluated in the setting of persisting minimal residual disease. Recently, blinatumomab (stepwise dosing 9-28-112 μg/d) has been evaluated in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL and demonstrated promising results (ORR 43%) with acceptable safety (Viardot, 2016). We hypothesized that blinatumomab would improve response in RS patients failing to achieve CR after initial debulking with R-CHOP. Methods We report here the first results of a phase 2 multicenter study investigating the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab after R-CHOP debulking therapy for patients with untreated RS of DLBCL histology (NCT03931642). The patients with persisting (PR, SD) or progressive disease (PD) after 2 cycles of R-CHOP were eligible to receive an 8-week course of blinatumomab induction. Blinatumomab was administered at a stepwise dose of 9 μg/d in the first week, 28 μg/d in the second week, and 112 μg/d thereafter. The primary endpoint was CR rate according to the revised Lugano criteria after the 8-week induction course of blinatumomab. An additional 4-week consolidation cycle was optional. Allo-HSCT was further allowed for eligible patients. Results A total of 34 patients out of 41 has already been enrolled in the trial to date. Median age was 66 years (range, 38-82) and sex ratio M/F was 23/12. CLL features at baseline were as follows: 57% had 17p deletion and 67% TP53 mutations. Sixty-five percent had complex karyotype and 79% unmutated IGHV status. Median number of prior therapeutic lines for CLL was 2 (range, 0-7): 19 (54%) patients previously received chemo-immunotherapy, 23 (66%) patients were exposed to ibrutinib and 11 (31%) to venetoclax. As of the data cut-off of June 1st, 2021, the blinatumomab induction course has been completed for 18 patients. Ten patients did not receive blinatumomab for the following reasons: 7 patients achieved CR after R-CHOP, 2 patients died because of febrile neutropenia after R-CHOP and 1 patient presented severe pneumonia after R-CHOP. Three patients are still on R-CHOP and 3 others on blinatumomab to date. Regarding toxicity during blinatumomab, data are available for the 18 patients having completed the blinatumomab induction to date. All patients had at least one grade 1 adverse event (AE), 10 had grade ≥3 AE. The most common AE (> 1 case), regardless of relationship to blinatumomab, were fever (4 patients), CRS (2 patients), sepsis (2 patients), vein thrombosis (2 patients), anemia (4 patients), neutropenia (3 patients), lymphopenia (5 patients), thrombocytopenia (3 patients) and hyperglycemia (5 patients). In terms of neurologic events, 5 (28%) experienced neurotoxicity (all recovered) including grade 3 encephalopathy, grade 4 confusion, grade 3 anxiety, grade 1 myoclonus, grade 2 ataxia, grade 1 sleep disorder and grade 1 ICANS (each in 1 pt). Blinatumomab was temporarly stopped in 3 patients and permanently in 2. In terms of efficacy, after R-CHOP debulking therapy (n=31 evaluable patients), 7 patients achieved CR, 6 patients were in PR, 7 patients were stable and 11 patients were progressive. At evaluation after the blinatumomab induction (n=18 evaluable patients), 4 (22.2%) patients achieved CR, 4 (22.2%) patients PR, 2 (11.1%) patients were stable and the remaining 8 (44.5%) were progressive. Considering the whole strategy (including R-CHOP debulking) (n=28), 15 (54%) patients achieved overall response including 11 (39%) CR. Conclusions Our preliminary data suggest that blinatumomab suggests encouraging anti-tumor activity and acceptable toxicity in patients with RS. Disclosures Ysebaert: Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Roche: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Ferrant: AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; AbbVie: Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. de Guibert: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria. Laribi: Astellas Phama, Inc.: Other: Personal Fees; AstraZeneca: Other: Personal Fees; Novartis: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; Le Mans Hospital: Research Funding; IQONE: Other: Personal Fees; Jansen: Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Personal Fees; Takeda: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding. Feugier: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: blinatumomab is approved for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The aim of this phase 2 study is to evaluated it in patients with Richter's syndrome.

Download Full-text

Blinatumomab after R-CHOP Debulking Therapy for Patients with Richter Transformation: Preliminary Results of the Multicenter Phase 2 Blinart Trial from the Filo Group

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136667 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 4-5

Author(s):

Romain Guieze ◽

Loic Ysebaert ◽

Lysiane Molina ◽

Damien Roos-Weil ◽

Anne-Sophie Michallet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

B Cells ◽

Tumor Cells ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Grade 3

Background Richter syndrome (RS) refers as to the onset of aggressive lymphoma, mostly diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The outcome of RS pts is usually very poor with both low response rates to chemoimmunotherapy and short survival, except for the minority of them whose tumor cells are clonally unrelated to the underlying CLL. While BCR and BCL2 inhibitors have transformed the management of CLL pts, these drugs do not prevent the onset of RS. Modulating anti-tumor immunity has recently been suggested as a promising approach in RS (Ding, 2017). Blinatumomab is a bi-specific T-cell engaging antibody construct that transiently links CD3-positive T cells to CD19-positive B-cells, inducing T-cell activation and subsequent lysis of tumor cells. It has been approved for the treatment of pts with relapsed or refractory B-ALL and has also been evaluated in the setting of persisting minimal residual disease. More recently, blinatumomab (stepwise dosing 9-28-112 μg/d) has been evaluated in pts with relapsed or refractory DLBCL and demonstrated promising results (ORR 43%) with acceptable safety (Viardot, 2016). We hypothesized that blinatumomab would improve response in RS pts failing to achieve CR after initial debulking with R-CHOP. Methods We report here the first results of a currently ongoing phase 2 multicenter study investigating the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab after R-CHOP debulking therapy for pts with untreated RS of DLBCL histology (NCT03931642). The pts achieving complete remission (CR) after 2 cycles of R-CHOP21 discontinued study while those with persisting (PR, SD) or progressive disease (PD) were eligible to receive an 8-week course of blinatumomab induction. An additional 4-week consolidation cycle was optional and might be proposed according to the treating-physician decision, especially in pts who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. Blinatumomab was administered at a stepwise dose of 9 μg/d in the first week, 28 μg/d in the second week, and 112 μg/d thereafter. The primary endpoint was CR rate according to the revised Lugano criteria after the 8-week induction course of blinatumomab. Interim analysis (Simon two-stage design) was planned after completion of blinatumomab induction in 10 pts. Results A total of 15 pts out of 35 has already been enrolled in the trial to date. Median age was 67 years (range, 38-80) andsex ratioM/F was 12/3. CLL features at baseline were as follows: 9/15 (60%) pts hadTP53alterations and 10/13 (77%) unmutated IGHV status. Median number of prior therapeutic lines for CLL was 2 (range, 0-4): 10 (67%) pts previously received chemo-immunotherapy, 10 (67%) pts were exposed to BCR inhibitors and 3 (20%) to venetoclax. As of the data cut-off of July 1st, 2020, the blinatumomab induction course has been completed for 5 pts while it is still on-going in 3 others. Three pts are still on R-CHOP debulking. Four pts discontinued study before receiving blinatumomab for the following reasons: 2 pts achieved CR after R-CHOP, 1 patient died because of febrile neutropenia after R-CHOP and 1 patient discontinued study before starting R-CHOP (no RS criteria after pathology review). Regarding toxicity during blinatumomab, data are available for the 5 pts having completed the blinatumomab induction to date. Four pts had at least one grade 1 adverse event (AE), 2 had grade ≥3 AE. The most common AE, regardless of relationship to blinatumomab, were grade 1 fever (2 pts) and grade 2 leukopenia (2 pts). Other grade >1 AE were observed in 1 pt only (grade 3 anxiety, grade 2 anemia, grade 2 neutropenia, grade 3 lymphopenia). In terms of neurologic event, 1 pt had grade 1 AE (paresthesia, myoclonus and muscle contraction) and another one presented grade 4 confusion while on first 9 μg/d dose leading to permanent discontinuation of blinatumomab. In terms of efficacy, after R-CHOP debulking therapy (n=10 evaluable pts), 2 pts achieved CR (and did not pursuit on study), 5 pts were in PR and 3 pts were progressive. At evaluation after the blinatumomab induction (n=5 evaluable pts), 2 pts achieved CR, 1 patient PR and 2 pts were progressive. Conclusions Our preliminary data suggest that blinatumomab shows encouraging anti-tumor activity and acceptable toxicity in pts with RS. Further analyses are warranted to validate these conclusions. Updated efficacy/safety in the remaining pts enrolled in the trial will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Guieze: astrazanecka:Honoraria, Other: advisory board;gilead:Honoraria, Other: travel funds;janssen cilag:Honoraria, Other: advisory board, travel funds;roche:Other: travle funds;abbvie:Honoraria, Other: advisory board, travel funds.Ysebaert:AbbVie:Consultancy;Janssen:Consultancy;Roche:Consultancy.Fornecker:Roche:Consultancy;Takeda:Consultancy.Broséus:Gilead:Honoraria;AstraZeneca:Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen:Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis:Honoraria, Research Funding.Feugier:astrazeneca:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;abbvie:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;roche:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;gilead:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;janssen:Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Blinatumomab is a bi-specific T-cell engaging antibody construct that transiently links CD3-positive T cells to CD19-positive B-cells. It has been approved as a second line treatment for Philadelphia chromosome-negative relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Download Full-text

Navitoclax (ABT-263) Plus Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide/Rituximab (FCR) or Bendamustine/Rituximab (BR): A Phase 1 Study In Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2455.2455 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2455-2455 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Thomas J. Kipps ◽

William G. Wierda ◽

Jeffrey A. Jones ◽

Lode J. Swinnen ◽

Jianning Yang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Anti Tumor Activity

Abstract Abstract 2455 Background: Navitoclax (ABT-263), a novel, orally bioavailable, small molecule, binds with high affinity (Ki ≤1nM) to Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, promoting apoptosis. In vitro, navitoclax shows potent targeted cytotoxicity (EC50 ≤ 1μM) against T and B lymphoid malignancies that over-express Bcl-2. A phase 1 trial demonstrated oral navitoclax monotherapy to be well-tolerated and to have anti-tumor activity in patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, thrombocytopenia (TCP) was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Phase 3 studies showed improved outcomes in CLL pts with the fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) combination, and a phase 2 trial showed bendamustine/rituximab (BR) to be effective for pts with relapsed or refractory CLL. Navitoclax enhanced R (monotherapy and in combination with chemotherapy) efficacy in preclinical models of B-cell lymphoma. Methods: This is an ongoing, international, phase 1 dose-escalation study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral navitoclax in combination with FCR (Arm A) or BR (Arm B) in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL. Secondary objectives are efficacy endpoints (PFS, ORR, TTP, OS, duration of response). Eligible pts had measurable disease, ECOG performance score ≤1, ANC ≥100/μL, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, and hemoglobin ≥9.0 g/dL. Preliminary results are reported. After obtaining informed consent, pts were assigned to Arm A or Arm B based on physician preference, each consisting of 28-day dose-escalation cycles with once-daily, pre-infusion, navitoclax treatment on Days 3–5 of Cycle 1 and Days 1–3 of subsequent cycles. In both arms, R was 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of Cycle 1; and 500 mg/m2 on Day 2 of Cycle 2 and on Day 1 of subsequent cycles. In Arm A, F 25 mg/m2 and C 175 mg/m2 were dosed on Days 2–4 in Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1–3 in subsequent cycles. In Arm B, B was dosed at 70 mg/m2 on Days 2 and 3 of Cycles 1 and 2, and on Days 1 and 2 in subsequent cycles. Navitoclax starting dose was 110 mg daily. Dose escalation to the next cohort (200 mg) was according to a continuous reassessment model. Tumor responses were evaluated using NCI-WG 1996 criteria. Pts could continue on navitoclax therapy for 1 yr in the absence of progressive disease or significant toxicity. Results: As of July 2010, 7 pts enrolled in the initially prioritized Arm B (BR+navitoclax); all completed the first cohort of 110 mg (median age 60 yr [range 55–72]). Study sites are currently enrolling pts in Arm A (FCR+navitoclax); 2 pts have enrolled to date. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–7). One pt had a DLT of elevated AST (Arm B, 110 mg cohort) and 1 pt had a DLT of neutropenic fever (Arm A, 110 mg cohort). In Arm B, neither TCP nor neutropenia have been DLTs. For the 7 pts with navitoclax-related AEs, the most common were diarrhea (3 pts), nausea (5 pts), and fatigue (3 pts). Seven pts remain on study; 2 pts discontinued due to disease progression and 2 withdrew per physician preference. In Arm B, preliminary antitumor best responses were assessable in 4 pts who received 2 cycles; 1 CRi in a pt with del17p- (based on lymph node [LN] response and no morphologic evidence of CLL in the bone marrow), 2 unconfirmed CRs (based on LN response and no bone marrow at this time), and 1 PR in a pt with del17p- (this pt subsequently received an allogeneic stem cell transplant). Preliminary PK results for the Arm B 110 mg cohort indicated that navitoclax PK was similar in Cycle 1 (navitoclax+BR) and Cycle 2 (navitoclax alone), and appeared comparable to PK in the navitoclax monotherapy study. Conclusions: Early results show that the combination of navitoclax with BR is well-tolerated, without DLTs of TCP or neutropenia, and show evidence of anti-tumor activity. Data are limited in the FCR portion of the study. The maximum tolerated dose of navitoclax has not been reached. Accrual is ongoing and following completion of the dose-escalation components of this study, expanded cohorts of pts will be assessed using the recommended phase 2 dose of navitoclax to further assess the tolerability and dose, and to continue to explore for efficacy signals in combinations. Preliminary data in combination with BR are encouraging. Disclosures: Kipps: Abbott Laboratories: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding. Wierda: Abbott: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jones: Glaxo Smith-Kline: Consultancy; Abbott: Research Funding. Swinnen: Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Yang: Abbott: Employment. Cui: Abbott: Employment. Busman: Abbott: Employment. Krivoshik: Abbott: Employment. Enschede: Abbott: Employment. Humerickhouse: Abbott: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Phase II Trial of Ofatumumab In Subjects with Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.1795.1795 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 1795-1795 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Richard R. Furman ◽

Herbert Eradat ◽

Julie C. Switzky ◽

Suzanne R. Hayman ◽

Craig C. Hofmeister ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

International Workshop ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Rapid Rise ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1795 Background: Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell lymphoma characterized by a heterogeneous population of lymphocytes, plasmacytoid lymphocytes and plasma cells with variable CD20 expression. Rituximab (R) achieves an overall response rate (ORR) of 25–50% in relapsed/refractory WM and is associated with IgM flares, manifested by a rapid rise in IgM, potentially leading to complications of hyperviscosity. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets an epitope encompassing both the large and small extracellular loops of CD20 and effectively induces complement-dependent cytotoxicity of B-lymphoma cells. OFA is approved for the treatment of fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has demonstrated clinical activity in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Given the efficacy of OFA in CLL, with its decreased CD20 antigen density, similar to WM where CD20 is down-regulated with differentiation of cells into plasma cells, a Phase II, open-label, single-arm trial of OFA in patients (pts) with WM was initiated to examine the safety and efficacy of OFA in this population. We report data from a planned interim analysis, which was performed to examine IgM flare, toxicity and response data. Methods: Pts (age ≥18 years) with WM requiring therapy by 2nd International Workshop on WM criteria were eligible. Pts received OFA 300 mg week 1 and 1000 mg weeks 2–4. Premedication included acetaminophen and antihistamine (all infusions) and glucocorticoid (infusions 1 and 2). Pts who experienced grade 3–4 infusion-related adverse events (AEs) during weeks 1 and 2 also received glucocorticoid during weeks 3 and 4. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed by 3rd International Workshop on WM criteria, and toxicity was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE, v3.0. Results: Fifteen pts were enrolled between March 2009 and January 2010. Median age was 59 years (range 43–85), and 9 pts were male. Pts had a median IgM level of 3.70 g/dL (range 1.21–6.62) and median hemoglobin (hgb) of 9.8 g/dL (range 5.3–11.7). Three pts were previously untreated; 12 pts had received a median of 3 therapies (range 2–5), including 11 pts who had received R, and 7 pts who had received a purine analog. Fourteen pts completed all 4 infusions of OFA. One pt withdrew from study after infusion 3 due to a drug-related serious AE (SAE). One pt had cryoglobulinemia, which interfered with IgM assessment. Of the 14 pts with evaluable IgM levels, 3 achieved partial response (PR), and 3 achieved minor response (ORR=43%) 8 weeks to 5 months after start of OFA therapy. One of 3 previously untreated pts and 5 of 12 relapsed pts responded. Four of 11 pts who had received prior R and 2 of 4 R-naïve pts responded. Five of 9 pts with IgM <4 g/dL and 1 of 5 pts with IgM >4 g/dL responded. Four pts with a median hgb of 8.0 g/dL (range 5.3–9.2) experienced ≥2.8 g/dL increase in hgb, including 3 pts who had >5 g/dL increase; median time to reach hgb ≥11.0 was 4 weeks. Infusion-related events occurred with dose 1 (300 mg) in 12 pts and with dose 2 (1000 mg) in 7 pts; all infusion events were grade 1–2 except 2 grade 3 events (rash, serum sickness). Nine pts developed 11 infections: 7 URI, 2 UTI, 1 sinusitis, 1 oral candidiasis (all grade 2). One pt developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Two pts developed SAEs possibly related to OFA. One pt developed grade 3 Coombs-negative hemolytic anemia after infusion 3 resulting in study withdrawal, and 1 pt with a baseline IgM level of 6.62 g/dL developed grade 3 renal insufficiency due to a rapid rise in IgM and cast nephropathy 6 weeks after starting OFA. One additional pt, with a baseline IgM level of 4.69 g/dL, developed a rapid rise in IgM and hyperviscosity symptoms. Both pts with a rapid rise in IgM underwent plasmapheresis with resolution of symptoms. No other OFA-related hematologic toxicity was observed. Conclusions: OFA has an acceptable toxicity profile, although a rapid rise in IgM requiring plasmapheresis was observed in 2 pts with high baseline IgM levels. OFA shows clinical activity in pts with WM, including those who relapse after R therapy, with rapid improvement in hgb and slower reduction of IgM levels. Based on the acceptable safety profile in this study and the dose of OFA approved for refractory CLL, the study was amended to increase the OFA dose to 2000 mg and allow a 2nd cycle of therapy for pts who do not attain PR after cycle 1. Accrual to the amended study is ongoing. Disclosures: Furman: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Consultancy; Calistoga: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Ofatumumab is an investigational anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma) as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis). Switzky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Research Funding; Genmab: Employment, Research Funding. Leonard:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Liao:GSK: Employment. Shah:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment; Genmab: Research Funding. Brownell-Buttich:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Lisby:Genmab A/S: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Employment.

Download Full-text

Clinical Safety and Activity in a Phase 1 Trial of IPI-145, a Potent Inhibitor of Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase-δ,γ, in Patients with Advanced Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.3663.3663 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 3663-3663 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Ian W. Flinn ◽

Steven M. Horwitz ◽

Manish Patel ◽

Anas Younes ◽

James R. Porter ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Hematologic Malignancies ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Expansion Cohort ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Abstract 3663 Introduction: Phosphoinositide-3-kinases (PI3Ks) play pivotal roles in cell signaling and regulate a variety of cellular functions relevant to oncogenesis. Impaired development and function of B and T lymphocytes has been demonstrated in PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform knockout mice, supporting the development of PI3K-δ,γ specific inhibitors for B- and T-cell lymphoid malignancies. IPI-145 is a potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor in clinical development for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies. The activity of IPI-145 via PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ isoform inhibition has been characterized in biochemical and cellular assays and demonstrated in preclinical models of B- and T-cell mediated disease. Early results of the Phase 1 study in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies are reported here. Methods and Patients: This Phase 1 dose-escalation study is designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and activity of orally administered IPI-145 in pts with advanced hematologic malignancies, including T-cell lymphomas/leukemias. Sequential cohorts of pts are enrolled at progressively higher dose levels with expansion cohorts of pts with select hematologic malignancies. IPI-145 is administered orally 2 times per day (BID) continuously in 28-day cycles. Tumor response is evaluated based on disease-specific standard criteria. Results: As of 16 July 2012, the study had enrolled 20 pts; 5 pts with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL), 4 with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL), 3 with aggressive B-cell NHL [including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) n=2 and Richter's transformation n=1], 3 with multiple myeloma (MM), 2 with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), 2 with T-cell lymphoma [anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) n=2] and 1 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Of these pts, 11 are male and 9 female, with a median [range] age of 63 years [30–81], with 36% <6 month from most recent prior systemic therapy. The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1–8]. IPI-145 doses administered include 8 mg BID (n=1), 15 mg BID (n=6), 25 mg BID (n=7), 35 mg BID (n=3), and 50 mg BID (n=3). The median [range] number of treatment cycles was 2 [1–8], with 12 (60%) pts continuing on treatment. Adverse events (AEs) have occurred in 13 (65%) pts, including 7 (35%) pts with AEs Grade ≥3. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 11 pts (55%) with Grade ≥3 occurring in 5 pts (25%). Grade 4 neutropenia was the one dose limiting toxicity observed to date (15 mg dose cohort). New Grade ≥3 hematological laboratory abnormalities included neutropenia [n= 6 (30%)] and thrombocytopenia [n= 1 (5%)]. Grade 3 ALT/AST elevations occurred in 1 (5%) MM pt with onset 6 weeks after IPI-145 initiation. Preliminary PK show dose-proportional increases in plasma Cmax and AUC over the dose range studied. Further, the PK and initial pharmacodynamic (PD) data from the first 3 cohorts (8–25 mg BID) predict continuous suppression of the PI3K-δ pathway with increasing inhibition of the PI3K-γ pathway with a 25 mg BID dose or greater. In the evaluable pts (n=11), responses were observed at the 8, 15, and 25 mg BID dose levels including 2/3 CLL/SLL pts (0 CR/2 PR/1 SD), 1/2 iNHL pts (1 CR/0 PR/1 SD), and 1/1 in MCL (1 PR). No responses have been observed to date in evaluable pts with MM (0/3) or aggressive NHL (0/2). All pts with at least SD after 2 cycles (n=6) remain on treatment including the first pt dosed. Based on the PK/PD and the preliminary activity observed in pts with CLL, iNHL and MCL, an expansion cohort is enrolling pts in these select hematologic diseases dosed at 25 mg BID to further evaluate the safety and preliminary activity of IPI-145. Dose escalation continues with a focus on pts with T-cell malignancies and DLBCL where increasing suppression of the PI3K-γ isoform may improve the efficacy profile. Additional expansion cohorts in T-cell lymphoma, DLBCL, myeloproliferative neoplasms and the acute leukemias will better define disease specific activity. Conclusions: IPI-145, an oral, potent PI3K-δ,γ inhibitor, appears to be well tolerated and has shown initial clinical activity in pts with iNHL, MCL, and CLL. A dose of 25 mg BID effectively inhibits PI3K-δ, providing a rationale for expansion in CLL/iNHL/MCL. Additional safety and efficacy data from the ongoing dose escalation evaluation in T-cell/aggressive NHL and the CLL/iNHL/MCL expansion cohort will be presented. Disclosures: Flinn: Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Patel:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding. Younes:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; MIllenium: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Genentech: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Porter:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Sweeney:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Allen:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kelly:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Employment. Kahl:Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Inc. : Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome of Second Line Treatment in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Did Not Improve 2002-2013: A Population-Based Study from a Well-Defined Geographic Region

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.4166.4166 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 4166-4166

Author(s):

Anna Asklid ◽

Agnes Mattsson ◽

Einar Björgvinsson ◽

Maria Winqvist ◽

Sandra Eketorp Sylvan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Line Therapy ◽

Time Period ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains challenging. Major progress has been achieved with new agents such as ibrutinib and idelalisib. However relapses still occur with these agents or the treatment has to be withdrawn (Byrd et al, Blood 2015). Several new drugs have been or are currently tested in pivotal, non-controlled phase 2 trials on R/R CLL patients, with the majority of patients on 2nd line therapy following chemoimmunotherapy. Thus, reliable and matching historical data are required for comparison. We have previously reported on the outcome of heavily pretreated refractory patients (Eketorp Sylvan et al, Leuk Lymphoma 2014). The aim of the this study was to specifically investigate the outcome of 2nd line treatment prior to the access of small molecule-based treatment options, in consecutive patients from a well-defined geographical region, where almost complete follow-up exists and external referrals are minimal. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CLL were identified from the Cancer Registry in Stockholm (Nov 2002- Dec 2013) and patient files were reviewed individually to identify R/R patients. Efficacy and toxicity of 2nd line and later salvage therapies were recorded as well as long term follow-up. Patients were also grouped into treated in the early (Nov 2002-2007) and late time period (2008-2013) and compared regarding outcome. A multivariate cox proportional hazards model was perform to explore risk factors for outcome. Results: Chart review of 979 patients identified 148 consecutive, non-referred patients with R/R CLL undergoing various types of 2nd line salvage therapy. Median age was 73 years and 53% had Binet stage C. Del17p testing was available in 46% of patients of which 20.6% had del17p. Most frequently initiated treatments in 2nd line were chlorambucil (27.7%), FC (23.6%) and FCR (13.5%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 48.6% (3.4% CR). Median overall-survival (OS) from start of second line therapy was 37.9 months. Shorter OS was significantly associated with ECOG higher than 0, male sex, and age > 80 years. There was no difference in OS, PFS or ORR between those treated in the first vs the second time period of this study, despite that 2nd line use of chlorambucil decreased from 39% to 23% and use of FCR or BR increased from 0% to 26% from 2002-2007 to 2008-2013. However, median duration of response was significantly longer during the later time period (20.9 vs 10.3 months, p=0.035). During treatment, 50.7% of patients were hospitalized and 32.4% of patients experienced grade III-IV infections. Other AEs ≥ grade 3 occurred in 10.1% and 7.4% had bleeding events. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity, according to IWCLL-criteria, occurred in 0.7%/0.7% (Hb), 11.5%/8.8% (platelets) and 16.9%/36.5% (neutrophils). Toxicity was similar in both time periods. Conclusion: Our study describes the outcome of 2nd line treatment in R/R CLL in consecutive patients from a geographically well defined region with almost complete follow-up and without influence on the results from external referrals. Almost no improvement was observed in the outcome of 2nd line treatment during the 10 year period. Such real-world results may be used for comparison with data obtained in non-controlled phase 2 trials on new orphan drugs. Keywords: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Relapsed, Refractory, Clinical outcome Disclosures Asklid: Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Mattsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Björgvinsson:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Winqvist:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Eketorp Sylvan:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Søltoft:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Repits:Janssen Cilag: Employment. Diels:Janssen: Employment. Österborg:Janssen Cilag: Research Funding. Hansson:Jansse Cilag: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Nanatinostat (Nstat) and Valganciclovir (VGCV) in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive (EBV +) Lymphomas: Final Results from the Phase 1b/2 VT3996-201 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-152603 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 623-623

Author(s):

Bradley M. Haverkos ◽

Onder Alpdogan ◽

Robert Baiocchi ◽

Jonathan E Brammer ◽

Tatyana A. Feldman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 1B

Abstract Introduction: EBV can be associated with several types of lymphomas, with reported frequencies of up to 8-10% in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 30-100% in peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) subtypes, 80% in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and 15-30% in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), with adverse impact on outcomes. Nanatinostat (Nstat) is a Class-I selective oral HDAC inhibitor that induces the expression of the lytic BGLF4 EBV protein kinase in EBV + tumor cells, activating ganciclovir (GCV) via phosphorylation. This results in GCV-induced inhibition of viral and cellular DNA synthesis and apoptosis. Herein we report the final results from this exploratory study for patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas (NCT03397706). Methods: Patients aged ≥18 with histologically confirmed EBV + lymphomas (defined as any degree of EBER-ISH positivity), R/R to ≥1 prior systemic therapies with an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0×10 9/L, platelet count ≥50×10 9/L, and no curative treatment options per investigator were enrolled into 5 dose escalation cohorts to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) of Nstat + VGCV for phase 2 expansion. Phase 2 patients received the RP2D (Nstat 20 mg daily, 4 days per week + VGCV 900 mg orally daily) in 28-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal. Primary endpoints were safety/RP2D (phase 1b) and overall response rate (ORR) (phase 2); secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics, duration of response (DoR), time to response, progression free survival and overall survival. Responses were assessed using Lugano 2014 response criteria beginning at week 8. Results: As of 18 June 2021, 55 patients were enrolled (phase 1b: 25; phase 2: 30). Lymphoma subtypes were DLBCL (n=7), extranodal NK/T-cell (ENKTL) (n=9), PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (n=5), angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (n=6), cutaneous T cell (n=1), HL (n=11), other B cell (n=3), and immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders (IA-LPD) (n=13), including PTLD (n=4), HIV-associated (n=5), and other [n=4: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n=2), common variable/primary immunodeficiency (n=2)]. Median age was 60 years (range 19-84), M/F 35/20, median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1-11), 76% had ≥2 prior therapies, 78% were refractory to their most recent prior therapy, and 84% had exhausted standard therapies. EBER positivity ranged from <1 to 90% in 42 tumor biopsies with central lab review. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of all grades were nausea (38%), neutropenia (34%), thrombocytopenia (34%), and constipation (31%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs in >10% of patients included neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (20%), and lymphopenia (14%). Dose reductions and interruptions due to treatment-related AEs were reported in 14 (25%) and 16 (29%) patients, respectively. Only 1 patient had to discontinue therapy. There were no cases of CMV reactivation. For 43 evaluable patients (EBER-ISH + with ≥ 1 post-treatment response assessment) across all histologies, the investigator-assessed ORR and complete response (CR) rates were 40% (17/43) and 19% (8/43) respectively. Patients with T/NK-NHL (n=15; all refractory to their last therapy) had an ORR of 60% (n=9) with 27% (n=4) CRs. Two patients (ENKTL and PTCL-NOS) in PR and CR respectively were withdrawn at 6.7 and 6.6 months (m) respectively for autologous stem cell transplantation. For DLBCL (n=6), ORR/CR was 67%/33% (both CRs were in patients refractory to first-line R-CHOP). For IA-LPD (n=13), ORR/CR was 30%/20% (PTLD: 1 CR, other: 1 CR, 1 PR). For HL (n=10), there was 1 PR (4 SD). The median DoR for all responders was 10.4 m, with a median follow-up from response of 5.7 m (range 1.9-34.1 m). For the 17 responders, 8 lasted ≥ 6 months. Conclusions: The combination of Nstat and VGCV was well-tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile and shows promising efficacy in patients with R/R EBV + lymphomas, particularly in refractory T/NK-NHL, a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas with dismal outcomes, with multiple durable responses. Further evaluation of this novel combination therapy for the treatment of recurrent EBV + lymphomas is ongoing in the phase 2 VT3996-202 trial. Disclosures Haverkos: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baiocchi: Prelude Therapeutics: Consultancy; viracta: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; Codiak Biosciences: Research Funding; Atara Biotherapeutics: Consultancy. Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Research Funding; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy. Feldman: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Other: Study investigator. Brem: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SeaGen: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KiTE Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Morphosys/Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Scheinberg: Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Alexion pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Joffe: AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy. Katkov: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. McRae: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Royston: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Rojkjaer: Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Current Employment. Porcu: Viracta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Daiichi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Kiowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; DrenBio: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Study Investigating AFM11 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Preliminary Results

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-118136 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 3969-3969 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Galina Salogub ◽

Jiri Mayer ◽

Frantisek Folber ◽

Sebastian Grosicki ◽

Aleksander B Skotnicki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

B Cell ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

The Third ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Ongoing Phase

Abstract Background AFM11 is a bispecific, tetravalent T cell-engaging antibody construct binding to CD19 on B cell origin malignant cells such as B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and to CD3 on T cells. By engaging CD3-positive T cells, AFM11 elicits T cell-mediated killing of CD19-positive (CD19+) leukemia and lymphoma cells. In vivo anti-tumor activity of AFM11 was investigated in a Raji tumor xenograft model in non-obese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency (NOD/scid) mice reconstituted with human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Tumor growth in all AFM11-treated animal groups was significantly reduced. In the highest dose group, all animals achieved complete tumor remission. (Reusch et al., 2015). An ongoing Phase 1 study assesses safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy of AFM11 in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD19+ B-ALL. Methods Patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory CD19+ B-ALL are being enrolled into escalating cohorts of 1-6 pts. The primary objective of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of AFM11 administered as a 2-week continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion. AFM11 is administered over the first 2 weeks (wks) of each 4 wk cycle for up to 3 cycles. Pts with rapidly progressing disease receive pre-treatment with 200 mg cyclophosphamide and 10 mg/m2 dexamethasone over 3-5 days before initiating AFM11. A lower starting dose is employed during the first wk of cycle 1 and escalated to a target dose during the second wk of cycle 1 and all subsequent cycles. An accelerated titration design is used until toxicity is observed, followed by a classical 3+3 design. PD activity is assessed by flow cytometry of peripheral blood lymphocytes and serum cytokine measurements. Tumor response is evaluated by local bone marrow and peripheral blood laboratory results between days 15 and 18 of each cycle. Results As of June 29, 2018, fourteen pts (8 female/6 male) have been treated in 5 cohorts. The median age is 41.5 years (range 19-67) and the median number of prior therapies is 5 (range 1-12). AFM11 was well-tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) observed in the first 5 cohorts. The study switched to 3+3 design in cohort 3 due to the occurrence of grade 2 AFM11-related events in cohort 2. Enrollment into cohort 6 is ongoing and the MTD has not yet been reached. The most frequent (≥2 pts) AFM11-related adverse events were pyrexia (29%), myalgia (14%), and tremor (14%). Most of the events were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.03 grade 1-2, with one grade 3 and no grade 4 events observed. Transient and reversible neurological events occurred in 3 of 14 (21%) pts: grade 1 paresthesia (n=1), grade 1/grade 2 tremor (n=1 each), grade 2 lethargy (n=1); and grade 3 altered state of consciousness (n=1). The grade 3 event occurred during the third cycle of treatment and was managed with treatment interruption and steroids and resolved within 48 hours. The pt then completed the third cycle at a reduced AFM11 dose without incident. Peripheral B cell reductions were observed in multiple pts in cohorts 4 and 5 and notable cytokine release was detected in two pts. Two pts achieved complete remission with complete hematological recovery (CR): one pt in cohort 4 achieved CR after the first cycle and progressed 2 wks later; one pt in cohort 5 achieved CR after the first cycle which was sustained after the second and third cycles and was assessed as minimal residual disease (MRD) negative after cycle 3. As a result, this pt became eligible to receive stem cell transplantation upon study completion. Both CR pts had peripheral B-cell aplasia after the first few days of treatment. Updated data will be presented. Conclusions The CD19/CD3-targeting tetravalent bispecific T cell engager AFM11 was well-tolerated in pts with R/R B-ALL across the first 5 cohorts of an ongoing Phase 1 study, and the MTD has not been reached. Pyrexia was the most frequently observed related adverse event. Transient neurological events were observed and were consistent with those associated with other CD19-targeted therapies. Peripheral B cell reductions and complete remissions observed in pts treated in the higher dose cohorts suggest that AFM11 is active in pts with R/R B-ALL and that the study is nearing determination of the therapeutic dose and schedule. Disclosures Salogub: Affimed: Research Funding. Mayer:Novartis: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding. Folber:Affimed: Research Funding. Grosicki:Affimed: Research Funding. Skotnicki:Affimed: Research Funding. Prochwicz:Affimed: Research Funding. Myasnikov:Affimed: Research Funding. Gural:Affimed: Research Funding. Schoenborn-Kellenberger:Affimed: Consultancy. Brindley:Affimed: Consultancy. Knackmuss:Affimed: Employment. Schwarz:Affimed: Employment. Schmich:Affimed: Employment. Choe-Juliak:Affimed: Employment. Strassz:Affimed: Employment. Alland:Affimed: Employment. Doubek:AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Affimed: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy.

Download Full-text

Phase 2A Study of Copanlisib, a Novel PI3K Inhibitor, in Patients with Indolent Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.1701.1701 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 1701-1701 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Martin Dreyling ◽

David Cunningham ◽

Krimo Bouabdallah ◽

Sarit Assouline ◽

Eric Van den Neste ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Exploratory Study ◽

Research Funding ◽

Single Agent ◽

Objective Response ◽

Median Number ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Pi3k Inhibitor ◽

Aggressive Lymphoma ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: Copanlisib is a novel pan-Class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor with potent preclinical inhibitory activity against both PI3K-d and PI3K-α isoforms. Preliminary results from a phase II study of copanlisib in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) or chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been reported (Dreyling et al., ASH 2013), with an expansion cohort for patients with aggressive lymphoma still ongoing. We report here the final results of this exploratory study for patients with indolent NHL or CLL treated with copanlisib. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed indolent NHL or CLL and relapsed or refractory to ≥2 prior lines of treatment were eligible. Copanlisib was administered at a dose of 0.8 mg/kg as a 1 hour intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as assessed per independent radiologic review according to the response criteria for lymphoma (Cheson et al., JCO 17:1244,1999) or the guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CLL (Hallek et al., Blood 111:5446-56, 2008). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR), safety and tolerability. Results: A total of 33 patients were treated in the indolent group, including: follicular NHL (FL) = 16, CLL = 13, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) = 3, and small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) = 1. Median age was 68 years (range 46-89), M/F= 15/18. The median number of previous lines of treatment was 4. Thirty patients (91%) were previously exposed to rituximab. The median number of cycles received was 5.7 (mean 7.2); the median dose and median cumulative dosage of copanlisib administered were 52 mg (87% of planned dose) and 687 mg, respectively. Five patients were dose reduced to 0.6 mg/kg and 1 to 0.4 mg/kg. The ORR as determined by independent radiologic review in 32 evaluable patients was 47%, with 1 CR, 1 uCR, and 13 PRs. By histology, there were 1 CR, 1 uCR and 5 PRs for patients with FL (ORR 47%), and 2/3 PRs for patients with MZL and 1/1 PR for the patient with SLL, for an overall ORR for patients with indolent NHL (excluding CLL) of 53%. The ORR for patients with CLL was 38% (all PRs). Overall, the median DOR was 287 days (95% CI: 56; not yet reached); median PFS was 240 days (95% CI: 173; 419). The most common adverse events (AEs) of all grades were hyperglycemia (70%), hypertension (70%), fatigue (64%), diarrhea (36%), neutropenia (36%) and anemia (33%). Grade 3-4 AEs occurring in >10% of patients included: hypertension (49% grade 3), neutropenia (30%), hyperglycemia (30% grade 3), and anemia (15%). Dose reductions, interruptions, or permanent discontinuations due to AEs were reported in 4 (12%), 21 64%), and 11 (33%) patients, respectively. There was one drug-related grade-5 event; meningitis in a heavily-pretreated CLL patient with longstanding disease-related immunodeficiency, occurring shortly after first administration of copanlisib. Conclusions: Copanlisib is active as a single-agent in heavily pretreated, advanced refractory/relapsed FL, MZL, SLL, and CLL. Copanlisib exhibited an acceptable toxicity profile, consistent with previous reports. Based on the results of this exploratory study, a phase 2B study of copanlisib in relapsed or refractory indolent NHL (after prior treatment with an alkylating agent and rituximab) has been initiated and is ongoing. Disclosures Dreyling: Bayer HealthCare: Scientific advisory board/consultant Other. Cunningham:Roche: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Merck Serono: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding. Giurescu:Bayer Pharma AG: Employment. Mappa:Bayer S.p.A.: Employment. Grunert:Bayer Pharma AG: Employment. Childs:Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals: Employment.

Download Full-text

Results of a Phase 2 Study of MEDI-551 and Bendamustine Vs Rituximab and Bendamustine in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4472.4472 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4472-4472

Author(s):

Douglas Gladstone ◽

Marc Andre ◽

Jan Zaucha ◽

Sarit Assouline ◽

Naresh Bellam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Micro Rna ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Stock Ownership ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Mirna Signature ◽

Grade 3 ◽

All Treatment

Abstract Background: In patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), novel therapies are needed to prolong disease control. MEDI-551, an afucoslylated, affinity-optimized, anti-CD19 antibody, functions by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, with a 30% monotherapy response rate in CLL. A phase 2 randomized, open-label study (NCT01466153) is evaluating the clinical activity, efficacy, and safety of combination therapy with MEDI-551 + bendamustine compared with rituximab + bendamustine in R/R CLL patients. Methods: Patients were initially randomized to receive bendamustine 70 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1, 2 with either MEDI-551 2 or 4 mg/kg on days 2, 8 of cycle 1 (on day 1 of subsequent cycles) or rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of cycle 1 (then 500 mg/m2 IV on day 2 of subsequent cycles), for up to six 28-day cycles. The 4-mg/kg dose of MEDI-551 was selected for the final efficacy analysis against rituximab. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters. Disease response was determined using 2008 International Working Group criteria. Exploratory objectives included micro RNA (miRNA) expression levels before and after treatment. Results: As of March 2014, the safety population comprised 147 patients across all treatment arms. The median age was 66 years (range 41–81), with 11% of patients with deletion (del) (17p), 20% with del (11q), 30% with del (13q), 12% with trisomy 12, and 39% with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chains (IgVH). The median number of treatment cycles was 4 (range 1–6). Treatment-related AEs observed in ≥20% of patients included nausea, infusion-related reactions (IRRs), nausea, fatigue, pyrexia, neutropenia, and cough in the MEDI-551 arm vs nausea, fatigue, constipation, asthenia, pyrexia, and neutropenia in the rituximab arm. Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs are listed in the table. Table. Treatment-Related Grade 3/4 AEs (≥5% of patients in any treatment group) Parameter, n (%) MEDI-551 + Bendamustine Rituximab + Bendamustine 2 mg/kg (n=32) 4 mg/kg (n=56) (n=59) Patients reporting ≥1 event 20 (63) 25 (45) 29 (49) Neutropenia 8 (25) 9 (16) 20 (34) IRR* 6 (19) 4 (7) 1 (2) Thrombocytopenia 2 (6) 1 (2) 5 (9) Lymphopenia 2 (6) 1 (2) 4 (7) Anemia 1 (3) 0 3 (5) Fatigue 0 0 3 (5) *Note: After 42 patients were enrolled in the study (all treatment groups), corticosteroid prophylaxis was recommended before patients receiving the initial dose of MEDI-551. Discontinuation of study treatment because of AEs occurred in 26% of patients receiving MEDI-551/bendamustine (including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, bradycardia, abdominal pain, asthenia, fatigue, cytokine release syndrome, hypersensitivity, pneumonia, infusion-related reactions, elevated liver function tests, dehydration, hyponatremia, headache, depression, epistaxis, hypoxia, rash, and hypotension) and in 20% of those receiving rituximab/bendamustine (including febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, cardiac failure, uveitis, small intestine obstruction, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, asthenia, fatigue, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome). No treatment-related deaths occurred in any treatment arm. Clinical activity was observed in both the MEDI-551 and rituximab arms, and a biomarker has been identified that may predict for MEDI-551 responders. Expression of a miRNA signature is specifically elevated in NHL patient samples. Low pretreatment levels of this miRNA signature in whole blood may predict for responders to MEDI-551. Three-fold lower levels (P<.0001) in pretreatment samples from MEDI-551 responders vs nonresponders were noted, but no differences in miRNA signature expression were noted between responders and nonresponders in the rituximab arm. Conclusions: Data show evidence of clinical activity in R/R CLL patients, with comparable safety observed between the MEDI-551 and rituximab arms. Expression level of a miRNA signature is able to predict for those more likely to respond to MEDI-551, with MEDI-551 responders having low pretreatment miRNA signature expression. Disclosures Gladstone: MedImmune: Research Funding. Andre:MedImmune: Research Funding. Zaucha:MedImmune: Research Funding. Assouline:MedImmune: Research Funding. Bellam:Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Facet: Research Funding. Cascavilla:MedImmune: Research Funding. Jourdan:MedImmune: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Panwalkar:MedImmune: Research Funding. Patti:MedImmune: Research Funding. Zaja:MedImmune: Research Funding. Goswami:MedImmune: Employment; MedImmune: Stock ownership, Stock ownership Other. Elgeioushi:MedImmune: Employment; MedImmune: Stock ownership, Stock ownership Other. Streicher:MedImmune: Employment; MedImmune: Stock ownership, Stock ownership Other. Bao:MedImmune: Employment; MedImmune: Stock ownership, Stock ownership Other. Spaner:MedImmune: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 First-in-Human Trial of AMV564, a Bivalent Bispecific (2x2) CD33/CD3 T-Cell Engager, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-111529 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1455-1455 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Peter Westervelt ◽

Gail J. Roboz ◽

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽

Sangmin Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Dose Level ◽

T Cell Activation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Activation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Disease Stage ◽

Molecular Abnormalities ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: AMV564 is a novel bivalent, bispecific (2x2) CD33/CD3 targeted immunotherapy that binds both CD33 and the invariant CD3ε on T-cell receptors with strong avidity, thus creating an immune synapse between CD33-expressing cells and T cells, initiating T-cell directed lysis of CD33 expressing cells, and inducing expansion, differentiation and proliferation of T cells. By design, AMV564 has reduced clearance and therefore has a longer half-life (t1/2) than monovalent, bispecific T-cell engagers. In preclinical investigations using both leukemic cell lines and primary cells from AML patients, AMV564 eliminated myeloid blasts with picomolar potency and broad activity independent of cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities, CD33 expression level, and disease stage, with no nonspecific activation of T cells (Reusch U et al. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:5829-38). Methods: This is an ongoing Phase 1 study with a 3+3 dose-escalation design (NCT03144245). The primary objectives of this study are to characterize the safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-leukemic activity of AMV564. Evaluation of pharmacokinetics (PK), cytokine changes, and immunophenotyping are secondary objectives. Key inclusion/exclusion criteria are: adults with relapsed and/or refractory AML after 1-2 prior induction regimens (with a standard anthracycline-based regimen or hypomethylating agent) and no more than 2 prior salvage regimens. AMV564 is administered by continuous intravenous infusion (CIV) for 14 consecutive days for up to 2 induction cycles. AMV564 and cytokine (IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, TNF-α, and IFN-γ) concentrations were measured by validated immunoassays. T-cell activation was measured using flow cytometry to quantify T cells expressing CD25, CD38, CD69, or HLA-DR. Results: To date, 19 patients (10 male/9 female) with a median age of 72 years (range 24-84) have been enrolled in 6 dosing cohorts: 0.5, 1.5, 5.0, 15, 50, and 100 mcg/day. Thirteen patients (68%) had secondary AML and/or adverse cytogenetics, including 6 patients (32%) with a p53 mutation. Fifteen patients (79%) had received at least 1 prior salvage regimen and 11 (58%) had received prior intensive chemotherapy, including 6 patients (32%) who had received a high-dose (≥ 1 gm/m2) cytarabine-based regimen. Overall, 18 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. No dose-limiting toxicity or treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) were reported. Grade 2 CRS was observed in 1 patient (treated at 50 mcg/day) without a lead-in dose and was managed with drug interruption and 1 dose of tocilizumab. The patient was able to resume dosing and completed the full 14-day scheduled therapy without recurrence of CRS. Subsequent patients treated at 50 mcg/day and above were given a 15 mcg/day lead-in dose for 3 days followed by 11 days at the assigned dose level. The most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent AE has been febrile neutropenia, reported in 39% (7/18) of patients and all considered unrelated to study drug. No patient has died within 30 days of treatment initiation. AMV564 PK was linear with a terminal t1/2 of 2-3 days. Plasma concentrations increased gradually, with times to steady-state concentration of 3-7 days. Marked increases in IL6 (peak concentration, 1.1 ng/mL), IL8 (1.5 ng/mL), and IL10 (0.3 ng/mL) cytokines were observed and increased numbers of activated T-cells were detected post-treatment. Reductions in bone marrow blasts, ranging from 13% to 91%, were observed in 12 of 18 evaluable patients including a partial response after cycle 1 in 1 patient at the 100 mcg/day dose level. Conclusions: AMV564 is well-tolerated and demonstrates anti-leukemic activity through T-cell engagement. AMV564 has a unique PK profile with a gradual increase in drug concentration and thus the potential for controlled T-cell activation. Disclosures Roboz: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Argenx: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Argenx: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Sandoz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Aphivena Therapeutics: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Cellectis: Research Funding; Eisai: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding. Lee:AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Clinipace: Consultancy; Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy. Rettig:Amphivena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novimmune: Research Funding. Han:Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Guenot:Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc: Employment. Feldman:Amphivena Therapeutics, Inc: Employment.

Download Full-text