Response to Extracorporeal Photopheresis in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma: A Retrospective Medical Chart Review

Abstract INTRODUCTION Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory therapy that has been used in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) for over 30 years. Clinical trials of newer agents for the treatment of CTCL have shown response rates of approximately 30% in heterogeneous patient populations. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of ECP in the treatment of CTCL patients in real-world clinical practice. METHODS This is an interim analysis of a retrospective medical chart review study conducted at clinical sites in the United States, in which treating physicians were responsible for patient selection and data collection via structured case report forms. Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CTCL who initiated ECP between January 1, 2017 and February 28, 2019 were included in the study. In addition, patients must have initiated ECP at age ≥18 years with no ECP treatment received within the year prior to data collection, have received at least 3 months of ECP treatment, and have response data available in the patient chart. Data collected included patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatments received prior to and concomitantly with ECP. Clinical outcomes were collected every 3 months during treatment for up to 18 months, and included the body surface area (BSA) affected, appearance of new skin lesions, and the physician-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scores. Response to ECP was defined as >50% reduction in BSA affected at any point during the follow-up period, consisting of the time from ECP initiation through the time of data collection. Data analysis was descriptive in nature. RESULTS Four clinical sites participated in the study and enrolled a total of 26 patients for the interim analysis. Patients were predominantly female (53.8%) and White (88.5%). Mean age at CTCL diagnosis was 68.4 years, and the majority patients were diagnosed with Sézary syndrome (57.5%) or mycosis fungoides (30.8%). Nearly half of patients (46.1%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis (IVA, 26.9%; IVB, 19.2%) and half of patients (50.0%) had lymph node involvement at diagnosis. Median BSA involvement with plaques/patches at diagnosis was 80% (interquartile range [IQR], 20% to 90%). Six patients (23.1%) achieved >50% reduction in BSA affected, and among those, median time to response was 6.0 months (IQR, 2.9 to 15.0 months). New skin lesions appeared in 5 patients (19.2%). Among those with available data, the percentage of patients rated as minimally improved, much improved, or very much improved on the CGI-I was 57.7% at 3 months (N=26), 50.0% at 6 months (N=18), and 60.0% at 9 months (N=15) after ECP initiation. CONCLUSIONS This retrospective observational study describes patient characteristics and clinical outcomes among CTCL-diagnosed patients initiating therapy with ECP. Despite the population treated with ECP in real-world practice being older and having more advanced-stage disease compared to recent clinical trials, response rate was comparable. Disclosures Girardi: Transimmune: Patents & Royalties: Inventor/IP; Helsinn: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Soligenix: Research Funding; Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Stradefy Biosciences Inc: Patents & Royalties: Inventor/IP; Actelion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Huang: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment. Corman: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Edmundson: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Kale: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Rusibamayila: Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Foss: Kura: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Acrotech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Kyowa: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Preclinical Evaluation of Gilteritinib on NPM1-ALK Driven Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Cells

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-130633 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2865-2865

Author(s):

Sudhakiranmayi Kuravi ◽

Janice Cheng ◽

Kishore Polireddy ◽

Gabrielle Fangman ◽

Roy A Jensen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tyrosine Kinase ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Large Cell ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Apoptotic Protein ◽

Large Cell Lymphoma ◽

Alk Positive

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is an aggressive type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) comprising 2-8% of adult and 10-20% of pediatric and adolescent NHL. More than three-fourths of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive ALCL express (nucleophosmin1) NPM1-ALK fusion gene as a result of t(2;5) chromosomal translocation. The self-dimerization of fusion kinase NPM1-ALK mediates constitutive activation of the chimeric tyrosine kinase activity leading to downstream signaling pathways responsible for lymphoma cell proliferation and survival. The current standard treatment regimen for ALK+ ALCL is CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxy doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy. Oftentimes, resistance and failure of remission occur with CHOP therapy, making it a suboptimal treatment regimen for many patients. Therefore, an alternative therapeutic approach is warranted to better address the needs of the ALK+ ALCL population. Gilteritinib is a recently FDA approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor for the treatment of FMS-like tyrosine kinase (FLT3) mutation-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Along with inhibition of FLT3, gilteritinib also inhibits other tyrosine kinases such as AXL and ALK. In this study, for the first time, we demonstrated gilteritinib mediated growth inhibitory effects on NPM1-ALK driven ALCL cells. We have used a total of five cell lines in our study: NPM1-ALK endogenously expressing human ALCL cell lines (SUDHL-1, SUP-M2, SR-786, and DEL), and our laboratory generated ectopically overexpressing Ba/F3-FG-NPM1-ALK, a murine cell line. Gilteritinib treatment (5-20 nM) inhibited NPM1-ALK fusion kinase phosphorylation, which resulted in downregulation of downstream survival signaling pathways including AKT, ERK1/2, and STAT3 leading to induced apoptosis and decreased clonogenic survival. Gilteritinib mediated apoptosis was associated with caspase 3/9 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage with increased pro-apoptotic protein BAD and decreased anti-apoptotic protein MCL-1. Increased expression of c-Myc is associated with ALK-positive ALCL and gilteritinib treatment decreased c-Myc levels in a dose dependent manner. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated gilteritinib treatment induced cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase with a concomitant decrease in G2/M and S phases. In summary, our preclinical results suggest gilteritinib has therapeutic potential for the treatment of ALCL cells expressing NPM1-ALK and other ALK /ALK-fusion driven hematologic or solid malignancies. Disclosures Lin: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ganguly:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. McGuirk:ArticulateScience LLC: Other: Assistance with manuscript preparation; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Radioimmunotherapy for Mantle Cell Lymphoma: 5-Year Follow-up of 90 Patients from the International RIT-Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124192 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5263-5263

Author(s):

Karin Hohloch ◽

Christine Windemuth-Kieselbach ◽

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

Roberto E. Cacchione ◽

Wojciech Jurczak ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Follicular Lymphoma ◽

Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Primary Therapy ◽

First Line ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mantle Cell

To assess the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with 90yttrium-ibrutinib-tiuxetan (90Y-IT) in mantle cell lymphoma, data from 90 patients registered in the RIT Network with a median follow-up (FU) of 5.5 years after RIT were evaluated. 90Y-IT was given as first-line therapy in 45 (50%) (consolidation 44 pts., primary therapy 1 pt.) and at relapse in 45 (50%) patients (consolidation 24 pts., recurrence 12 pts., therapy refractory 3 pts., conditioning 2 pts., other 4 pts.). As a first-line treatment, 30 patients (pts.) (67%) achieved CR, 10 pts. (22%) PR%., 1 pt. (2%) PD, and for 4 pts. (9%) no response data was available. At relapse, CR was achieved in 17 pts. (38%), PR in 6 pts. (13%), SD in 2 pts. (4%), and 6 pts. (13%) had PD, while the response was not documented for 14 pts. (31%). After a median FU of 5.5 years, median PFS for all patients was 2.11 (95%CI: 1.03-2.32) years, and median OS was 4.05 (95%CI 2.79-7.21) years. Eleven pts. (12.2%) developed second malignancy. In conclusion, this is the largest report of MCL pts. treated with 90Y-IT to date. 90Y-IT was most often used as consolidation after first- and second-line chemotherapy and may improve the results achieved using chemoimmunotherapy alone. However, the results are less encouraging compared to treatment with small molecules such as ibrutinib. Disclosures Zinzani: TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy. Jurczak:Sandoz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Loxo: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celtrion: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Truemper:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy. Scholz:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Hexal: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy; GILEAD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankio: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Yttrium 90 (90Y) Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin) is approved for treatment of patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma and as consolidation therapy after chemo(immuno)therapy of patients with follicular lymphoma.

Download Full-text

Impact of Interim FDG-PET (iPET) in the Outcomes of Patients with Aggressive B-Cell Lymphomas Receiving DA-EPOCH-R

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122393 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2898-2898

Author(s):

Vania Phuoc ◽

Leidy Isenalumhe ◽

Hayder Saeed ◽

Celeste Bello ◽

Bijal Shah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Fdg Pet ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

B Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

End Of Treatment

Introduction: 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) remains the standard of care for baseline and end of treatment scans for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs). However, the role of interim FDG-PET remains not as well defined across aggressive NHLs, especially in the era of high-intensity chemoimmunotherapy. Interim FDG-PET (iPET) can serve as an early prognostic tool, and prior studies evaluating the utility of iPET-guided treatment strategies primarily focused on diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) and frontline R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone). Classification criteria systems assessing response also differ between studies with no clear consensus between use of Deauville criteria (DC), International Harmonization Project (IHP), and the ΔSUVmax method. Methods: This study evaluates our institutional experience with iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R (dose-adjusted etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin with or without Rituximab) in aggressive NHLs. We retrospectively evaluated 70 patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who started on DA-EPOCH ± R between 1/1/2014 to 12/31/2018 for aggressive NHLs. Response on interim and end-of-treatment (EOT) scans were graded per DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods, and progression free survival (PFS) probability estimates were calculated with chi-square testing and Kaplan Meier method. PFS outcomes were compared between interim negative and positive scans based on each scoring method. Outcomes were also compared between groups based on interim versus EOT positive or negative scans. Results: We identified 70 patients with aggressive NHLs who received DA-EPOCH ± R at our institute. The most common diagnoses were DLBCL (61%) followed by Burkitt's lymphoma (10%), primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (9%), plasmablastic lymphoma (7%), gray zone lymphoma (6%), primary cutaneous large B-cell lymphoma (1%), primary effusion lymphoma (1%), and other high-grade NHL not otherwise specified (3%). Of the 43 patients with DLBCL, 21/43 (49%) had double hit lymphoma (DHL) while 7/43 (16%) had triple hit lymphoma (THL), and 3/43 (7%) had MYC-rearranged DLBCL while 2/43 (5%) had double expressor DLBCL. Thirty nine out of 70 (56%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 58.39 years (range 22.99 - 86.86 years). Most patients had stage IV disease (49/70, 70%), and 43/70 (61%) had more than one extranodal site while 45/70 (64%) had IPI score ≥ 3. Forty-six out of 70 (66%) received central nervous system prophylaxis, most with intrathecal chemotherapy (44/70, 63%). Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) had iPET available while 6/70 (9%) had interim computerized tomography (CT) scans. Fifty-six out of 70 (80%) had EOT PET, and 4/70 (6%) had EOT CT scans. Sustained complete remission occurred in 46/70 (66%) after frontline DA-EPOCH ± R (CR1), and 12/70 (17%) were primary refractory while 5/70 (7%) had relapse after CR1. Four of 70 (6%) died before cycle 3, and 3/70 (4%) did not have long-term follow-up due to transition of care elsewhere. Median follow-up was 15.29 months (range 0.85 - 60.09 months). There was significantly better PFS observed if iPET showed DC 1-3 compared to DC 4-5 (Χ2=5.707, p=0.0169), and PFS was better if iPET was negative by IHP criteria (Χ2=4.254, p=0.0392) or ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=6.411, p=0.0113). Comparing iPET to EOT PET, there was significantly better PFS if iPET was negative with EOT PET negative (iPET-/EOT-) compared to iPET positive with EOT negative (iPET+/EOT-), and iPET+/EOT+ and iPET-/EOT+ had worse PFS after iPET-/EOT- and iPET+/EOT- respectively. This pattern in iPET/EOT PFS probability remained consistent when comparing DC (Χ2=30.041, p<0.0001), IHP (Χ2=49.078, p<0.0001), and ΔSUVmax method (Χ2=9.126, p=0.0104). These findings fit clinical expectations with positive EOT scans indicating primary refractory disease. There was no significant difference in PFS when comparing DLBCL versus non-DLBCL (Χ2=3.461, p=0.0628) or DHL/THL versus non-DHL/THL diagnoses (Χ2=2.850, p=0.0914). Conclusion: Our findings indicate a prognostic role of iPET during treatment with DA-EPOCH ± R for aggressive NHLs. Significant differences in PFS were seen when graded by DC, IHP, and ΔSUVmax methods used in prior studies and when comparing interim versus EOT response. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures Bello: Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Shah:Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Spectrum/Astrotech: Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene/Juno: Honoraria. Sokol:EUSA: Consultancy. Chavez:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Final Results of Phase 1/1b Study of Tenalisib, Dual PI3K δ/γ Inhibitor in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123954 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2831-2831 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Swaminathan P. Iyer ◽

Brad M. Haverkos ◽

Jasmine Zain ◽

Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽

Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Advisory Committees

Introduction: Tenalisib (RP6530) is a novel, highly specific, dual PI3K δ/γ inhibitor with nano-molar inhibitory potency at the enzyme and cellular level. PI3K plays a critical role in T-cell development and activation and several studies have validated the PI3K-AKT pathway as a potential therapeutic target in T cell lymphomas. Preliminary results of the ongoing Phase 1/1b T-cell lymphoma (TCL) study demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with encouraging clinical activity in relapsed/refractory TCL (Oki, ASCO 2018 and Iyer, ASH 2018). We now present the final results of the study (NCT02567656). Methods: This study comprised of four-dose escalation cohorts, followed by two dose expansion cohorts at MTD enrolling 20 patients each in PTCL and CTCL cohorts. Patients had histologically confirmed TCL, ECOG PS ≤2, and had received ≥1 prior therapy. Patients received Tenalisib [200 mg BID-800 mg BID (fasting), 800 mg (fed only)] orally until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objectives were to determine the MTD and pharmacokinetic profile. The secondary objective was to evaluate overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. Responses were evaluated for PTCL and CTCL based on IWG criteria (Cheson 2007) and mSWAT respectively. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Results: Fifty-eight patients were enrolled in study, 19 in dose escalation and 39 in dose expansion (28 PTCL and 30 CTCL). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-15). Safety assessment of 58 patients receiving at least one dose of Tenalisib demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Treatment related Grade≥3 AEs were elevated ALT/AST (21%), rash (5%), and hypophosphatemia (3%). These events were reversible and managed by withholding study drug. Additionally, in few patients (N=9), steroids were used to manage elevated ALT/AST. There were six treatment related serious adverse events, none of these led to fatal outcome. At end of the study, four (3 CTCL; 1 PTCL) patients who completed minimum 8 cycles of therapy were rolled over to a compassionate use study (NCT03711604) and were followed up. Efficacy assessments demonstrated an ORR of 46% (3 CR and 13 PR) and clinical benefit rate (CR+PR+SD) of 77%. Subset efficacy analysis showed an ORR in PTCL of 47% (3 CR; 4 PR) and in CTCL of 45% (9 PR). The median time to initial response was 1.8 months and was similar in both sub-types. The overall median DOR was 4.91 months (range 0.9-26.6); in PTCL patients the DOR was 6.53 months, (range: 0.97-21.0) and 3.8 months (range: 1.67-25.67) in CTCL patients. In 3 PTCL patients who achieved CR, the median DOR was 19.5 months (range 7.5-21). Conclusion: Tenalisib demonstrated promising clinical activity and an improved safety profile in patients with relapsed/ refractory TCL. Currently, a phase I/II combination study to further evaluate safety and efficacy with romidepsin is ongoing in this target population. Disclosures Iyer: Arog: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Zain:Spectrum: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Korman:Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Glaxo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immune Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyowa: Research Funding; Leo: Research Funding; Menlo: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Principia: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Research Funding; Regeneron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Rhizen: Research Funding; Sun: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syntimmune: Research Funding; UCB: Research Funding; Valeant: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Dermira: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Routhu:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Barde:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Nair:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals S.A.: Employment. Huen:Galderma Inc: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline Inc: Research Funding; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Innate Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Alternating Courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP Plus Rituximab Followed by a High Dose ARA-C Containing Myeloablative Regimen and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) Is Superior to 6 Courses CHOP Plus Rituximab Followed by Myeloablative Radiochemotherapy and ASCT In Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results of the MCL Younger Trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network (MCL net)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.110.110 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 110-110 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Olivier Hermine ◽

Eva Hoster ◽

Jan Walewski ◽

Vincent Ribrag ◽

Nicole Brousse ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Treatment Failure ◽

Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Overall Response ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 110 Background: Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) has been characterized by poor long term prognosis with a median survival of only 3 to 4 years. However, outcome has improved during the last decades. In its first randomized trial, the MCL net demonstrated that myeloablative consolidation followed by ASCT resulted in a significant prolongation of PFS in advanced stage MCL (Dreyling et al Blood 2005). Recent phase II studies suggested that the addition of rituximab to CHOP like chemotherapy and/or high dose ARA-C may significantly improve remission rates and PFS. A French phase II trial using sequential R-CHOP/R-DHAP followed by ASCT showed an overall response rate of 95% with a CR rate of 61% translating into a median EFS of 83 months and a 75% survival rate at 5 years (Delarue et al ASH 2008). Methods: To evaluate the potential superiority of a high dose ARA-C containing regimen, the MCL net initiated a randomized trial comparing 6 courses of CHOP plus Rituximab followed by myeloablative radiochemotherapy (12 Gray TBI, 2×60mg/kg Cyclophosphamide) and ASCT (control arm A) versus alternating courses of 3x CHOP and 3x DHAP plus Rituximab followed by a high dose ARA-C containing myeloablative regimen (10 Gray TBI, 4×1,5 g/m2 Ara-C, 140mg/m2 melphalan) and ASCT (experimental arm B). Patient eligibility criteria included previously untreated MCL stage II-IV up to the age of 65 years. Histological diagnosis was confirmed by a central pathology review board. The primary end point time to treatment failure (TTF) was monitored continuously by a sequential procedure based on a one sided triangular test. Stable disease after induction, progression or death from any causes, were considered as treatment failure. Sample size was calculated to detect a hazard ratio of 52% for arm B with a power of 95%. Randomization was stopped as soon as a significant difference was observed between the two arms. Results: From July 2004 to May 2010, 497 patients were randomized in 4 countries (Germany, France, Poland, Belgium). The 391 patients evaluable for the primary analysis (19 no MCL, 87 not yet documented) displayed similar characteristics in both treatment arms: median age 55 vs 56 years, male 78% vs 79%, stage IV 85% vs 79%, B symptoms 43% vs 33%, ECOG >2 5% vs 5%, elevated LDH 37% vs 38%, and MIPI low/int/high risk 61%/25%/14% vs 62%/23%/15%, respectively. After induction overall response was similarly high in both arms (A: 90% vs B: 94%; p=0.19) and CR rate and combined CR/CRu rate were significantly higher in arm B (26% vs 39%; p=0.012 and 41% vs 60%; p=0.0003). The number of patients transplanted was similar in both arms (72% vs 73%) and after transplantation overall response and CR rates were comparable in both arms (97% vs 97% and 63% vs 65%, respectively). After a median follow up of 27 months, patients in arm B experienced a significantly longer TTF (49 months vs NR; p=0.0384, hazard ratio 0.68) mainly due to a lower number of relapses after CR/CRu/PR (20% vs 10%), whereas the rate of ASCT-related deaths in remission was similar in both arms (3% vs 4%). Although CR rate after ASCT was comparable in both arms, remission duration (RD) after ASCT was superior in Arm B (48m vs NR; p=0.047). Interestingly, for patients in CR after ASCT, RD after ASCT was also presumably superior in arm B (51 months vs NR; p=0.077). At the time of analysis overall survival was similar in both arms with medians not reached and 79% vs. 80% survival rates at 3 years (p=0.74). Safety after induction was comparable in both arms except for an increased grade 3/4 hematological toxicity (Hb 8% vs 28%, WBC 48% vs 75%, platelets 9% vs 74%, respectively), an excess of renal toxicity (creatinine grade 1/2: 8% vs 38%, grade 3/4: none vs 2%), and more frequent grade 1/2 nausea and vomiting in arm B. Toxicities of both conditioning regimen were similar, except for higher grade 3/4 mucositis (43% vs. 61%) in Arm B, and higher grade 1/2 liver toxicity and constipation in Arm A. Conclusions: High dose ARA-C in addition to R-CHOP+ASCT increases significantly complete response rates and TTF without clinically relevant increase of toxicity. Therefore, induction regimen containing high dose ARA-C followed by ASCT should become the new standard of care of MCL patients up to 65 years. Disclosures: Walewski: Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Stilgenbauer:Amgen: Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding. Feugier:roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Bosly:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Final Results From a Pivotal, Multicenter, International, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Romidepsin In Progressive or Relapsed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Following Prior Systemic Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.114.114 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 114-114 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Bertrand Coiffier ◽

Barbara Pro ◽

H. Miles Prince ◽

Francine M Foss ◽

Lubomir Sokol ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Prior Systemic Therapy

Abstract Abstract 114 Background: Romidepsin is a potent HDAC inhibitor approved by the FDA for patients (pts) with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. Durable clinical benefit and tolerability of romidepsin in pts with recurrent or refractory PTCL have been previously observed in a phase 2 trial conducted by the National Cancer Institute. The aim of this phase 2, single-arm, open-label registration study was to evaluate the activity of romidepsin in a larger number of pts with progressive or relapsed PTCL. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed PTCL (PTCL NOS, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ALCL [ALK-1 negative], other subtypes) who failed or were refractory to ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy, and had measurable disease and ECOG performance status 0–2 were eligible. Exclusions included inadequate bone marrow or other organ function and significant cardiovascular abnormalities. Pts received romidepsin 14 mg/m2 as a 4-h IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles; treatment could be extended for stable disease (SD) or response. The primary endpoint was rate of complete response (CR + CRu) as evaluated by a central Independent Review Committee (IRC) using International Working Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. IRC assessment consisted of a 2-step process, with initial radiographic review of images (CT, MRI) followed by an overall clinical assessment based on the radiology evaluations, photographs, and relevant clinical parameters. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR): CR + CRu + partial response (PR), investigator-assessed responses, duration of response, time to response, and safety. Results: 131 pts from 48 US, European, and Australian sites were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of romidepsin (as-treated population); 130 patients had histologically confirmed PTCL by central review. Mean age of all pts was 59.4 y (range, 20–83) and median time since diagnosis was 1.25 y (range, 0–17). Median number of prior systemic therapies was 2 (range, 1–8). 21 pts (16%) had failed a prior stem cell transplant. Responses assessed by the IRC are noted in the table below. Longest duration of response is 26+ mo and 16 (94%) of the 17 pts with a CR had not progressed as of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010). Investigator-assessed responses included 21 pts (16%) with CR + CRu, 18 pts (14%) with PR for an ORR of 30%. Currently, 13 pts continue to receive treatment (range, 10–36 cycles). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 126 of 131 pts (96%). AEs reported in ≥ 20% of pts were nausea (59%), fatigue (41%), vomiting (38%), thrombocytopenia (38%), diarrhea (35%), pyrexia (34%), neutropenia (30%), anorexia (28%), constipation (28%), anemia (23%), and dysgeusia (21%). AEs ≥ grade 3 were reported for 86 pts (66%), with the most common (≥ 5%) being pneumonia (5%), pyrexia (5%), sepsis (5%), and vomiting (5%). 60 pts (46%) had at least 1 serious AE: the most frequently reported (≥ 5%) were pyrexia (7%), pneumonia (5%), vomiting (5%), and sepsis (5%). 22 pts (17%) withdrew due to AEs. 8 pts (6%) died within 30 days of the last dose of romidepsin; 1 death, due to sepsis, was assessed as possibly related to treatment. Conclusions: Complete and durable responses were observed with single agent romidepsin in pts with relapsed PTCL. These data support the therapeutic potential for romidepsin in relapsed PTCL and suggest that romidepsin is a strong candidate for inclusion in future novel regimens for these diseases. As of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010), the median duration of follow-up for CR is 8.2 mo. Disclosures: Coiffier: Gloucester: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Romidepsin is indicated for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Romidepsin is not currently approved for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Pro:Celgene: Research Funding. Prince:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Foss:Celgene: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Allos: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Sokol:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Caballero:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Padmanabhan:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shustov:Celgene: Research Funding. Nichols:Celgene: Employment. Carroll:Celgene: Employment. Balser:Gloucester Pharmaceutical: Consultancy. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Vantage 088: Vorinostat in Combination with Bortezomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Global, Randomized Phase 3 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.811.811 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 811-811 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos ◽

Sundar Jagannath ◽

Sung-Soo Yoon ◽

David S. Siegel ◽

Sagar Lonial ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

New Zealand ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Histone Deacetylase ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽

Chemotherapy Agents

Abstract Abstract 811 Introduction: Vorinostat (VOR), an oral inhibitor of histone deacetylase class I and class II proteins, regulates genes and proteins involved in tumor growth and survival. The synergistic effects of VOR and bortezomib (BTZ) have been shown in preclinical studies and were confirmed in independent phase 1 trials in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), producing objective response rates (ORRs) of up to 42% and overall clinical benefit of up to 90%. Materials and methods: Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 years, had measurable secretory MM, had received 1 to 3 prior systemic anti-myeloma regimens, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status ≤ 2. Previous exposure to BTZ and the presence of extracellular plasmacytoma were allowed per protocol, but patients with prior resistance to BTZ were excluded. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 21-day cycles of BTZ (1.3 mg/m2 intravenously; days 1, 4, 8, and 11) in combination with oral VOR 400 mg/d, or matching placebo, on days 1 to 14. Additional use of corticosteroids for the treatment of MM was not allowed during the trial. Patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, or withdrawal from the study. The primary endpoint for this trial was progression-free survival (PFS; occurrence of 412 PFS events). Secondary and exploratory endpoints included ORR (≥ partial response), clinical benefit response (ORR + minimal response), overall survival, time to progression, patient-reported outcomes questionnaires (QLQ-C30, QLQ-MY20), and safety/tolerability of this novel drug combination. Responses and progression were determined according to the European Bone and Marrow Transplantation Group criteria and will be confirmed by an Independent Adjudication Committee. Results: Between January 2009 and January 2011, 637 patients were enrolled from 174 centers in 33 countries across the globe making this trial one of the largest studies conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Median age of the study population was 62 years (range, 29–86 years). Of the enrolled patients, 59% were male and 56% were Caucasian. Patients had received a median of 2 prior regimens (range, 1–3). Prior anti-myeloma agents included BTZ (24%), thalidomide (56%), lenalidomide (13%), melphalan (56%), and stem cell transplantation (35%). As of July 2011, 635 patients had received study medication, with a median exposure of 7 cycles (mean: 7.6 cycles; range 1–30 cycles). Reported median exposure to BTZ monotherapy in previous phase 3 trials was approximately 5 cycles. Conclusions: The study passed the protocol-specified futility analyses by the independent data monitoring committee in November 2010. Database lock is anticipated in November 2011, and top-line data on primary and secondary endpoints will be available at the meeting. Disclosures: Dimopoulos: Celgene, Ortho-Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Vorinostat, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, is approved in the US for the treatment of cutaneous manifestations in patients with cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL) who have progressive, persistent or recurrent disease on or following two systemic therapies. Vorinostat is currently under investigation for the treatment of relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma, relapsed/refractory B cell lymphoma (in combination with other chemotherapy agents), and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (in combination with bortezomib and other chemotherapy agents). Jagannath:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yoon:Celgene: Consultancy; NK Bio: Consultancy. Siegel:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy. Hajek:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Merck: Educational lecture. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosiñol:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Blacklock:New Zealand Bone Marrow Donor Registry: Consultancy, Employment; Mercy Hospital, Auckland New Zealand: Consultancy; Leukaemia and Blood Foundation, New Zealand: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Middlemore Hospital: Employment, Research Funding. Goldschmidt:Amgen, Novartis, Chugai: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag, Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Palumbo:Merck: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Reece:Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding. Graef:Merck: Employment. Houp:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Sun:Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment. Eid:Merck Research Laboratories: Employment. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Acetylon: founder.

Download Full-text

A Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30-Positive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas: Interim Results.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.2746.2746 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 2746-2746 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Eric D. Jacobsen ◽

Ranjana H. Advani ◽

Yasuhiro Oki ◽

Jeff Sharman ◽

Steven M. Horwitz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antitumor Activity ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Nk Cell ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Objective Response ◽

Brentuximab Vedotin ◽

Grey Zone ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 2746 Background: Brentuximab vedotin (ADCETRIS®) is a CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate approved for the treatment of relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Several non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) have variable quantitative and qualitative expression of CD30. As a result of the high objective response rate (86%) and durable complete remissions (CR) observed in a pivotal phase 2 study in ALCL, a study was initiated to investigate the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in other NHLs that express the CD30 antigen. Methods: A phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study is currently ongoing to evaluate the antitumor activity of brentuximab vedotin in approximately 75 patients with relapsed or refractory CD30-positive NHL (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01421667). Brentuximab vedotin, 1.8 mg/kg, is administered every 3 weeks by IV infusion. Patients who achieve at least stable disease are eligible to receive continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary efficacy endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Efficacy variables will be analyzed by total patients, WHO NHL classification, DLBCL (excluding peripheral mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma [PMBL] due to differing treatment paradigms and outcomes for this DLBCL subtype), and by each individual disease. The correlation between antitumor activity and quantitative CD30 expression is also being explored. Results: Fifty-three patients with various CD30-positive NHLs have been enrolled to date (35 with B-cell neoplasms and 18 with mature T-/NK-cell neoplasms). Twenty-nine (55%) patients had refractory disease, 19 (36%) had relapsed since their most recent prior therapy, and 5 (9%) had primary refractory disease (did not achieve a CR with frontline therapy or relapsed within 3 months of completing frontline therapy). Diagnoses include DLBCL (assorted disease subtypes, n=22), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, n=9), PTCL-NOS (n=8), grey zone lymphoma (n=5), PMBL (n=4), follicular lymphoma (n=3), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (n=1), and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (n=1). The median age is 64 years (range 16–83) and 30 patients (57%) are male. Patients have received a median of 3 prior systemic therapies and 6 patients have received prior stem cell transplants. Of the 36 patients who have had a response assessment to date, 12 (33%) have achieved an objective response (5 CR, 7 partial remissions [PR]). The ORR for B-cell NHLs is 36% (9/25), and 27% (3/11) for mature T-/NK-cell NHLs. Thus far, responses are particularly noteworthy in DLBCL (excluding PMBL) where 7 of 15 patients (47%) have responded (3 CR, 4 PR), in AITL where 3 of 5 patients (60%) have responded (2 CR, 1 PR), and in grey zone lymphoma where 2 of 5 patients (40%) have achieved a PR. Median duration of response has not been reached. Of the 12 responding patients, 7 remain on treatment, 3 discontinued due to a patient decision (non-adverse event), and 2 due to adverse events of neutropenia (related) and pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (unrelated). CD30 expression levels for patients with a CR or PR were widely variable and ranged from <1% to 90%. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥10% of patients include fatigue (26%), diarrhea (16%), nausea (16%), pyrexia (16%), neutropenia (14%), dyspnea (12%), and abdominal pain (10%), and TEAEs considered related to study drug include fatigue (16%) and neutropenia (14%). Most AEs have been Grade 1 or 2. Grade 3 dyspnea, hyponatremia, and decreased white blood cell count have occurred in 2 patients each, while Grade 3 neutropenia has occurred in 3 patients. Two patients have experienced Grade 4 neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy events have been Grade 1 or 2. Conclusions: In this interim analysis of 53 patients (36 with response evaluations), compelling antitumor activity has been demonstrated in both B-cell and mature T-/NK-cell NHLs, in particular DLBCL, AITL, and grey zone lymphoma. Due to the range of CD30 expression in patients achieving an objective response, more data are needed to determine if there is a correlation between CD30 expression and antitumor activity. Preliminary safety data are consistent with the safety profile of brentuximab vedotin. Disclosures: Jacobsen: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin is indicated for treatment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma after failure of autologous stem cell transplant or after failure of at least two prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimens in patients who are not ASCT candidates and for the treatment of patients with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma after failure of at least one prior multi-agent chemotherapy regimen. These indications are based on response rate. There are no data available demonstrating improvement in patient reported outcomes or survival with brentuximab vedotin. Advani:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Abbott: Research Funding. Oki:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Sharman:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Horwitz:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Allos Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Genzyme: Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Forero-Torres:Seattle Geentics, Inc.: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. O'Connor:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Shustov:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Siddiqi:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Grove:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding, Travel expenses Other.

Download Full-text

Comprehensive Oncology Measures for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Treatment (COMPLETE): First Detailed Report of Primary Treatment

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.1614.1614 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 1614-1614 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Francine M. Foss ◽

Kenneth R. Carson ◽

Lauren Pinter-Brown ◽

Steven M. Horwitz ◽

Steven T. Rosen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

B Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Initial Treatment ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Primary Treatment ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract 1614 Background: Registries can be invaluable for describing patterns of care for a population of patients. COMPLETE is a registry of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) patients designed to identify the lymphoma-directed treatments and supportive care measures that PTCL patients receive. We report here the first detailed findings of initial therapy. Methods: This is a prospective, longitudinal, observational registry that is led by a global steering committee. Patients with newly diagnosed PTCL and providing written informed consent are eligible. Patients are entered into the registry from time of initial diagnosis and followed for up to 5 years. Only locked records are reported. Results: As of July 2012, 330 patients have been enrolled from the United States. The first patient was enrolled in February 2010. Locked baseline and treatment records are available for 124 and 81 patients, respectively. Of the 124 patients with locked baseline records, 67 patients (54%) were male, the mean age was 59 (range: 19–89), and race/ethnicity was recorded as: White (87 patients; 70%), Black (19; 15%), Asian (5; 4%) and other/unknown (13; 11%). Histology was reported as follows: PTCL-not otherwise specified (27%), anaplastic large cell lymphoma-primary systemic type (18%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (17%), transformed mycosis fungoides (7%), T/NK-cell lymphoma-nasal and nasal type (6%), adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, HTLV 1+ (6%) and other (19%). 25 patients (20%) had received another diagnosis, including B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin's disease and other T-cell lymphomas, prior to their current diagnosis of PTCL. 49 patients (40%) had B symptoms, 102 patients (82%) had an Ann Arbor stage of III/IV, 116 patients (94%) had ECOG performance status of 0–1, and international prognostic index (IPI) score was distributed as follows: IPI 0 (7% of patients), 1 (15%), 2 (43%), 3 (26%), and 4 (9%). Of the 81 patients with locked treatment records, details on initial treatment can be found in table below. Conclusions: This first detailed analysis of primary treatment of PTCL indicates that this disease is still largely being treated with regimens derived primarily from studies of B-cell lymphomas and that a single standard of care does not exist. The fact that a meaningful proportion of patients were initially diagnosed with something other than their current diagnosis of PTCL points out the challenges of diagnosing the disease. While the intent of initial treatment for most patients is to affect a cure, more than 20% of patients were noted as deceased at the end of initial treatment, underscoring the need for more effective, disease-specific therapy. Disclosures: Foss: Merck: Study Grant, Study Grant Other; Celgene: Study Grant, Study Grant Other; Eisai: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Allos: Consultancy. Carson:Allos: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pinter-Brown:Allos: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Allos: Consultancy, Research Funding. Rosen:Allos: Consultancy, Honoraria. Pro:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria; Allos: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Gisselbrecht:Allos: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hsi:Allos: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Abbott: Research Funding; Cellerant Therapeutics: Research Funding; BD Biosciences: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Outcome and Prognostic Factors in Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Relapsing After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: A Retrospective Study of the EBMT

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.474.474 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 474-474 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sascha Dietrich ◽

Herve Finel ◽

Ariane Boumendil ◽

Irit Avivi ◽

Liisa Volin ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prognostic Factors ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Salvage Chemotherapy ◽

Refractory Disease ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Mantle Cell ◽

One Year

Abstract Abstract 474 BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) is considered as standard treatment for non-frail patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, little is known about outcome of MCL recurrence after autoSCT. We therefore conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with MCL who failed autoSCT using the EBMT database. PRIMARY OBJECTIVE was to analyse outcome and prognostic factors after relapse following autoSCT for MCL in the rituximab era. PRIMARY ENDPOINT was overall survival (OS) from relapse. ELIGIBLE were patients aged 18 years or more who relapsed following an autoSCT for MCL performed between 2000 and 2010 and who were registered with the EBMT. Centres were contacted to provide additional information on relapse treatment. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS was based on log-rank comparisons and multivariable testing using Cox regression models. RESULTS: 1054 patients meeting the eligibility criteria could be identified in the EBMT registry. Of these, a full data set could be retrieved for 382 patients. Sixteen patients had to be excluded due to loss of follow up (n=7), wrong diagnosis (n=6), or falsely reported relapse (n=3). Median age at autoSCT of 366 evaluable patients was 59 years (range: 37 to 76), 290 patients (79%) were men. 64% had undergone autoSCT as part of 1st-line therapy; 68% and 49% had documented exposure to rituximab (RTX) and high-dose ara-C (HA) before autoSCT; and 12% had had refractory disease at autoSCT. Median time from autoSCT to relapse was 20 months (range: 0.4 to 117). 21 relapses (6%) occurred beyond 5 years after autoSCT. With a median observation time of 37 months (95% CI 32–43), median OS after relapse of the whole study group was 20 months. By univariate analysis, a long (>12mo) interval between autoSCT and relapse (p<0.001; HR 0.26; Figure 1A), 1st-line autoSCT (p=0.006; HR 0.7) refractory disease at autoSCT (p<0.001, HR 2.0) and more recent year of relapse (p<0.001, HR per year 0.9) significantly influenced OS from relapse, whereas age, gender, RTX and HA exposure did not. By multivariate analysis refractory disease at autoSCT (p<0.001, HR=2.14), remission duration after autoSCT (p<0.001 HR per 3 months 0.88) and calendar year of relapse (p<0.03, HR per year 0.93) were confirmed to be predictors for OS. In addition, HA exposure prior autoSCT adversely affected OS from relapse (p=0.06, HR 1.38). Salvage chemotherapy after relapse resulted in only 31% complete responses and 29% partial responses, whereas 40% of patients have been refractory to first salvage chemotherapy. 83 patients (23%) received an allogeneic SCT (alloSCT), whereas only 7 patients (2%) received a second autoSCT after relapse. Median time after relapse to second SCT was 7 months (range: 1 to 40). Survival after relapse for patients who received a second autoSCT was poor with no long-term survivor. AlloSCT performed for late relapse (>12mo) after autoSCT was associated with superior OS compared to patients who received an allograft upon a shorter remission duration after autoSCT (5-year OS from alloSCT 50% vs 0%; p=0.001; Figure 1B). Achievement of CR before alloSCT (p=0.05 HR=0.5), but not donor source, T-cell depletion or conditioning intensity affected OS after alloSCT. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MCL who relapse within one year after autoSCT have an extremely dismal outcome even with alloSCT. In contrast, about half of the patients who have MCL recurrence beyond one year after autoSCT and can undergo salvage alloSCT enjoy long-term survival. It remains to be shown if a similarly good outcome can be achieved without alloSCT in this favourable selection of patients. A 2nd autoSCT does not appear to be a promising option in patients with MCL failing a 1st autoSCT. Disclosures: Walewski: Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cephalon: Research Funding.

Download Full-text