scholarly journals Defining Genomic Probability of Progression to Identify Low-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 545-545
Author(s):  
Anil Aktas-Samur ◽  
Mariateresa Fulciniti ◽  
Sanika Derebail ◽  
Raphael Szalat ◽  
Giovanni Parmigiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Mutational Load ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Genomic Features ◽  
Genomic Deletions ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Short Period

Abstract On an average, 1% of monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance (MGUS) and 10% of smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM) progress to symptomatic MM every year within the first five years of diagnosis. The probability of progression significantly decreases for SMM patients after first 5 years. However, a distinct subset of SMM patients progress within 2 years and are re-classified as high-risk patients based on risk markers such as 20/2/20 or certain genomic features. Although recent studies have evaluated the high-risk genomic features for SMM but genomic background of SMM patients who do not progress to MM after long-term follow-up (>= 5 years) has not been described. Here, we evaluated transcriptomic and genomic changes enriched in non-progressor (NP) (no progression after 5 years of follow-up) precursor conditions (N=31) with those progressed within short period of time (N=71) and compared them with changes observed in newly diagnosed MM (N=192). Additionally, using transcriptome, epigenome and whole genome profiling we also studied additional unique samples from 18 patients at their precursor stage as well as when progressed to MM. Overall, we have observed significantly lower mutational load for NP SMM from progressor SMM (median SNV 4900 vs. 7881 p < 3e-04) with high sensitivity (0.83) and specificity (0.65) to separate NP from progressors. We have further developed a deep learning model by using more than 4500 genome wide features using ten-fold cross validation. This model indicated that not only the load but also the patterns of mutations (type, location, frequency) are different between two conditions. We also found that NP samples have significantly lower heterogeneity (p < 0.05). However, progressed samples showed similar mutational load and heterogeneity at precursor stage and MM. Among CNA differences, absence of gain or deletion of chr8 (not involving MYC region) were strong predictor of NP (OR=7.2 95% CI 2.2-24). Focal genomic loss was also significantly lower for NP (p=0.004) which was also reflected by low genome scar score (GSS) (p=0.07). Structural variant and copy number signature analysis also showed that NPs were showing significantly low exposure to non-clustered variable size genomic deletions. We observed similar frequency of primary translocations [t(11;14), t(4;14), and t(14;16)] in both progressor and NP samples as well as newly diagnosed MM. MYC translocation with any partner was not observed in NP samples, whereas 37% of progressor samples had a MYC translocations (OR=12.8). Adding all these differences including chr8 CNAs, MYC translocations, mutation burden, GSS, focal deletions, all driver mutations as well as primary translocations into recursive partitioning model to predict non-progressor SMM, we have identified a simple genomic model only involving chr8 CN changes and overall mutational burden to achieve a high sensitivity (0.82) and specificity (74%). Our transcriptomic analysis measured the distance between progressor and NP SMM as well as MM and found that NP SMM has greater difference with MM which is closer to progressor SMM. We quantified transcriptomic heterogeneity by using molecular degree of perturbation. This analysis showed that consistent with DNA changes, DNA repair pathway and MYC target genes are expressed similarly in NP SMM as in normal plasma cells compared to progressor SMM. Epigenomic analysis yielded 75 SEs regions differentially utilized between precursor and symptomatic MM stage using paired samples. The targeted genes included BMP6, PRDM1, STAT1, SERTAD2 and RAB21 and possibly regulating genes related to oncogenic KRAS activities. In conclusion, we define genomic characterization of non-progressor SMM and our results now provide the basis to develop molecular definition of SMM as well as risk driving features. Disclosures Munshi: Janssen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnology: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Other: scientific founder, Patents & Royalties; Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

scholarly journals High Throughput Genomic Analysis Identifies Low-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2-2
Author(s):  
Anil Aktas-Samur ◽  
Mariateresa Fulciniti ◽  
Sanika Derebail ◽  
Raphael Szalat ◽  
Giovanni Parmigiani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Private Company ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Mutational Processes

Multiple Myeloma is preceded by precursor states of monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Studies have shown that progression to symptomatic MM five years after diagnosis is 1% for MGUS and 10% for SMM. However, based on the genomic background, this rate is highly variable, especially for SMM patients. Recent studies have evaluated the high-risk genomic features for SMM, but the genomic background of SMM patients who do not progress to MM after long-term follow-up (>= 5 years) has not been described. Here, we evaluated genomic changes enriched in non-progressor (NP) (no progression after 5 years of follow-up) precursor conditions (N=31) with those progressed within a short time (N=71) as well as newly diagnosed Myeloma (N=192). We also studied additional unique samples from 18 patients at their precursor stage as well as when progressed to Myeloma. We report a similar large-scale CN alteration in non-progressor SMM compared to progressor SMMs or MM at diagnosis. However, whole-genome sequencing data showed that the overall mutational load for non-progressor SMM samples was lower than Progressor MGUS/SMM (median SNV 5460 vs. 7018). This difference significantly increased for mutations affecting the coding regions. NP samples at diagnosis had 26% and 53% less coding mutations (missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations) compared to progressor MGUS/SMM (p=0.008) and newly diagnosed MM (p < 0.001) respectively. We observed very low NRAS (3%, OR=8.86) and BRAF (3%, OR=2.17), mutation frequency in non-progressor SMM samples compared to newly diagnosed MM. We did not observe driver mutations in FAM46C, TTN, CYLD, TP53, KMT2C, IRF4, HIST1H1E that are otherwise frequently mutated in high-risk SMM or symptomatic MM. None of the non-progressor SMM samples had MYC alteration. We observed t(11;14), t(4;14), and t(14;16) translocations at similar frequency compared to newly diagnosed MM samples. We also observed a significant difference in non-recurrent focal deletions. Based on our recent data in newly-diagnosed MM, we quantified genomic scar score, and observed that non-progressor SMM have lower GSS (median=3,IQR=[1-9]) compared to progressor MGUS/SMM (median=11,IQR=[5-15] / median=9,IQR=[9-15], respectively) as well as MM samples at diagnosis (median=9, IQR= [5-16],p=0.002). We further validated this observation in an independent cohort with 69 SMM samples in whom progressor SMM patients had high GSS (median =4, IQR=[2-7.75]), compared to delayed progressor (> four years) or non-progressor SMM (median =1.5, IQR= [0-3.5]; p=0.029). Moreover, non-progressor SMM had significantly low utilization of APOBEC and DNA repair mutational processes. Next, we compared non- progressor SMM with progressor SMM using RNAseq data. We identified 1653 differentially expressed genes (DEG) (762 up-regulated and 891 down-regulated). Genes that were upregulated in non-progressor SMM samples were enriched in IL6/JAK/STAT3 and IL2/STAT5 signaling and the regulation of cytokine secretion. Whereas genes up-regulated in progressor SMM were enriched in MYC targets, DNA repair, and mTOR pathways. Moreover, genes that control the translational initiation, translational elongation, mitochondrial translation, and ATP control were among the top highly expressed genes in progressor SMM. We used our MGUS/SMM to MM paired samples and showed that the E2F target, MYC target, and G2/M checkpoint pathways are more active at MM. We measured the distance between progressor and non-progressor SMM as well as MM and found that non-progressor SMM is less similar to MM compared to progressor SMM. In conclusion, the global CNA and translocations are similar between progressor and non-progressor SMM and symptomatic MM and confirm their role in the development of precursor condition but not adequate for progression to MM, which requires additional hits. On the other hand, lower GSS score reflecting genomic stability along with lower SNVs, low DNA damage and APOBEC mutational processes, down-regulated MYC target genes, and low DNA repair activation define low-risk SMM. These results now provide the basis to develop a genomic definition of SMM. Disclosures Fulciniti: NIH: Research Funding. Parmigiani:Phaeno Biotehnologies: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; CRA Health: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Foundation Medicine Institute: Consultancy; Delphi Diagnostics: Consultancy; BayesMendel Laboratory: Other: Co-lead. Munshi:Janssen: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company; BMS: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Daratumumab monotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study (CENTAURUS)

Leukemia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 1840-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ola Landgren ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Yael C. Cohen ◽  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Peter Voorhees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Active Monitoring ◽  
Death Rates ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Current guidelines for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) recommend active monitoring until the onset of multiple myeloma (MM) before initiating treatment or enrollment in a clinical trial. Earlier intervention may delay progression to MM. In CENTAURUS, 123 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk SMM were randomly assigned to daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously on extended intense (intense), extended intermediate (intermediate), or short dosing schedules. At the prespecified primary analysis (15.8-month median follow-up), the complete response (CR) rates (co-primary endpoint) were 2.4%, 4.9%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively; the co-primary endpoint of CR rate >15% was not met. Progressive disease (PD)/death rates (number of patients who progressed or died divided by total duration of progression-free survival [PFS] in patient-years; co-primary endpoint) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.055 (80% confidence interval [CI], 0.014–0.096), 0.102 (80% CI, 0.044–0.160), and 0.206 (80% CI, 0.118–0.295), respectively, translating to a median PFS ≥24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and =0.0213, respectively). With longer follow-up (median follow-up, 25.9 months), CR rates were 4.9%, 9.8%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. PD/death rates for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.059 (80% CI, 0.025–0.092), 0.107 (80% CI, 0.058–0.155), and 0.150 (80% CI, 0.089–0.211), respectively, again translating to a median PFS ≥ 24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001 for all arms). Twenty-four–month PFS rates were 89.9% (90% CI, 78.5–95.4%), 82.0% (90% CI, 69.0–89.9%), and 75.3% (90% CI, 61.1–85.0%) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that intense dosing maintained target-saturating trough concentrations in most patients throughout weekly, every-2-week, and every-4-week dosing periods. No new safety signals were observed. These data provide the basis for an ongoing phase 3 study of daratumumab in SMM.

scholarly journals EARLY Results of TOTAL Therapy 7 (TT7): High Response Rates of NEWLY Diagnosed High Risk Myeloma to Daratumumab

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4569-4569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frits van Rhee ◽  
Sharmilan Thanendrarajan ◽  
Carolina D. Schinke ◽  
Jeffery R. Sawyer ◽  
Adam Rosenthal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Research Grant

Background. The TT approach has significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) by combining new drugs with a regimen that comprises induction, tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), consolidation and maintenance. However, a group of 15% of patients with high risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) have derived little benefit despite similar response rates to induction chemotherapy and ASCT when compared to low risk MM. The poor outcome of HRMM is explained by early relapse post ASCT resulting in a short progression free survival (PFS) with only 15-20% of patients surviving long-term. Daratumumab (Dara) is a human IgG1k anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has shown favorable results in early single-arm studies and more recently in phase III studies for relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM. In TT7, we introduced Dara during all phases of therapy, including immune consolidation early post ASCT, to improve responses rate and PFS in HRMM. Methods. Patients had newly diagnosed HRMM as defined by high risk cytogenetic abnormalities, presence of extramedullary disease, >3 focal lesions on CT-PET, elevated LDH due to MM, or ISS II/III with cytogenetic abnormality. Dara (16mg/kgx1) was added to induction with KTD-PACE (carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; and four-day continuous infusions of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide). Conditioning for tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was with fractionated melphalan (50mg/m2x4) (fMEL) based on prior observations that patients with adverse cytogenetics fare better with fMEL rather than single high dose MEL200mg/m2.In the inter tandem ASCT period immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/kg) alone for 2 doses was followed by Dara (16mg/kg) on day 1 combined with K (36mg/m2) and D (20mg) weekly for 2 cycles. DaraKD was administered to avoid treatment free periods allowing for myeloma regrowth. The 2nd ASCT was followed by further immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/k) for 2 doses, and maintenance therapy for 3 yrs with 3-months block of alternating Dara-KD (dara 16mg/kg day 1; K 36mg/m2 and dex 20mg weekly) and Dara-lenalidomide (R)D (dara 16mg/kg day 1; R 15mg day 1-21 q28 and D 20mg weekly). Results. TT7 enrolled 43 patients thus far. The median follow-up was 11 months (range: 1-22). The median age was 61 yrs (range 44-73). Sixteen patients were ≥65 yrs (37.2%). A mean of 29.4x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 4.6-86.4) were collected. 36 patients completed ASCT #1 (83.7%) and 18 (41.9%) ASCT #2, whilst 14 patients have proceeded to the maintenance phase. R-ISS II/III or metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 85.1 and 58.1% of patients, respectively. Elevated LDH or >3FL on CT-PET were noted in 30 and 41.8%. The 1-yr cumulative incidence estimates for reaching VGPR and PR were 87 and 83%, respectively. A CR or sCR was achieved in 68 and 46%. The 1-yr estimates of PFS and OS were 91.6 and 87.2%. 40 subjects are alive, whilst 5 progressed on study therapy and 3 subsequently died. 38 patients are progression free at the time of reporting. Dara was well-tolerated and no subjects discontinued therapy due to dara-related side effects. The CR and sCR rates compared favorably to the predecessor HRMM TT5 protocol where CR and sCR rates were 59 and 27%. Conclusion. The early results of TT7 point to increased response rates of HRMM to a dara-based TT regimen with especially higher rates of CR and sCR. Longer follow-up is required to determine if these early results translate into superior PFS and OS. Figure Disclosures van Rhee: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Adicet Bio: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Castleman Disease Collaborative Network: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Morgan:Amgen, Roche, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: research grant, Research Funding. Davies:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant/Advisor; Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research Grant, Research Funding.

Analysis of 179 Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Treated with Novel Agents Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT): a Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1343-1343
Author(s):  
Joyce Habib ◽  
Neil Dunavin ◽  
Gary Phillips ◽  
Patrick Elder ◽  
Meaghan Tranovich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Genetic Profile ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Abstract 1343 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy in the United States with an estimated 20,580 new cases in 2009. Over the past decade, the introduction of novel agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib) have played a pivotal role in improving response rates, duration of response, overall survival (OS) and quality of life. In this study we describe a single center experience with novel agents used for induction followed by high dose chemotherapy (HDT) and first autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients with MM. Method: A retrospective review of the medical records of 179 newly diagnosed patients with MM seen between October 2006 and December 2009 at The Ohio State University was performed. All patients received novel therapy containing thalidomide, bortezomib or lenalidomide as part of an induction regimen followed by ASCT. All patients received melphalan 140mg/m2 or 200mg/m2 as preparative regimen. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to plot progression free survival and overall survival. Results: Of the 181 patients seen, 2 were excluded because they did not receive a novel agent as part of induction treatment. Of the 179 patients analyzed, median age was 56.8 years (29-80) with 30% of patients older than 60 years. African American represented 19%. Fifty-nine percent were male, 80% had Durie-Salmon (DS) stage III while 25%, 28%, 18% represented International prognostic score (IPS) stage I, II, and III respectively with 27% unknown. Median comorbidity index score was 2 (2-7) and median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 90% (70-100). Thirty percent had high risk genetic profile, and 73% received one line of treatment before ASCT. The median time from diagnosis to ASCT was 8.33 months (4-58). The overall response rate (ORR) prior to transplant was 84% (9% complete (CR), 29% very good partial (VGPR), and 46% partial (PR)). The ORR post ASCT was 89% (CR 45%, VGPR 22%, PR 21%). Non relapse mortality was 1% and 3% at 100 days and 1 year respectively. At a median follow up of 31 months (7-90), 69 patients (38%) had relapsed. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 29 months with 1 and 3 years PFS of 79.3% and 61.5% respectively (Fig. 1). The OS was not reached. One and 3 years OS were 93% and 88% respectively (Fig. 1). Univariate analysis showed that time to transplant > 12 months was associated with poor outcome and decreased overall survival (HR 3.30, p = 0.008). High risk genetic profile was also found to be associated with decreased overall survival although this was not statistically significant (HR 2.31, p = 0.070). Multivariate analysis found that only time to transplant > 12 months was an independent predictor of decreased OS. Significant predictors for disease progression were high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months in patients receiving 2 or more treatments before ASCT. Conclusion: Induction with novel agents followed by HDT and ASCT improves CR rate, in our case from 9% to 45%. Median PFS (29 months) was comparable to other published data. OS was not been reached after a median follow up of 31 months. Predictors of progression include high risk genetic profile and time to transplant > 12 months. The only significant predictor for survival was time to transplant. Our study suggests that an early transplant may improve OS and PFS. An extended analysis will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Phillips: NCI/NIH: Research Funding; NCCM Grant: Research Funding; ARRA RC2 Grant: Research Funding. Byrd:Genzyme Corporation: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Early Mortality and Aggressive Presentation Lead to Poor Outcomes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Double Hit and Triple Hit Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3762-3762
Author(s):  
Charanpreet Singh ◽  
Sreejesh Sreedharanunni ◽  
Vandana Panakkal ◽  
Aditya Jandial ◽  
Arihant Jain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Double Hit

Abstract INTRODUCTION mSMART classifies high-risk Multiple Myeloma patients into Double Hit and Triple Hit Myeloma (DH/THM) on the basis of the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities detected. The outcome of these patients with the use of proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs with upfront Auto HSCT is not known in the real-world setting. We retrospectively studied the outcome of these patients in a resource constrained setting. METHODS The case records of all newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients who fulfilled the criteria for active myeloma between January 2018 and December 2020 were identified. The diagnosis of double hit and triple hit myeloma was based on mSMART classification (Presence of two or more of the following: IgH-FGFR3 translocation, IgH-MAF translocation, TP53 deletion, gain of chromosome 1q). Their case records were retrieved and information regarding baseline characteristics, therapy and outcomes was noted. RESULTS A total of 55 patients with newly diagnosed DH/THM were treated at our center during the study period. Median age of the cohort was 60 years with almost an equal number of male and female patients (M= 26; F= 29). Renal failure (serum creatinine &gt;2.0mg/dl) was present in 33 patients (60%) while bone lesions, anemia (Hemoglobin &lt;10 gm/dl) and hypercalcemia (serum calcium &gt;12mg/dl) were present in 44 (80%), 51 (92.7%) and 24 (43.6%) patients respectively. Six patients (10.9%) fulfilled the criteria for plasma cell leukemia. All but 2 patients had gain of 1q with at least 3 copies. The most common cytogenetic combination was IgH-FGFR3 translocation with gain of 1q, which was seen in 28 patients (50.9%). This was followed by co-occurrence of TP53 deletion with gain of chromosome 1q in 11 patients (20%). Nine patients (16.4%) had triple hit myeloma. Bortezomib was used in the initial therapy of 43 patients (78.2%) and IMiDs (lenalidomide, thalidomide and pomalidomide) were used in the initial therapy of 32 patients (58.2%). Most patients received triplet therapy (N=32; 58.2%) with the most common regimen being RVd. Nine patients (16.4%) died within the first month of diagnosis and another 7 died in next month [15 patients in 2 months (29.1%)]. The most common cause of death within 2 months was progressive disease (N=13; 81.3%). Twenty-two patients (40%) achieved VGPR or better with anti-myeloma therapy and 7 patients (12.7%) underwent autologous HCT. Of the 39 evaluable patients, 21 patients (53.8%) relapsed during follow up with a median EFS of 8 months. Of the 7 patients who underwent transplant, 5 patients have had a follow-up of more than 1 year, of whom 3 have relapsed. One patient with post-transplant relapse died with progressive disease and CMV colitis. Median follow up of the entire cohort was 11 months (Range- 0 to 35 months). After excluding patients who died within the first 2 months of diagnosis, the median follow up was 14 months (Range- 3 to 35 months). Thirty-three patients (60%) patients died during follow-up. The most common cause of death was active or progressive disease (25 patients, 78.1%). Median OS for the cohort was 13 months. On univariate analysis, survival was better for patients without renal injury at presentation (29 months vs 6 months; p=0.007) and patients with &lt;5% circulating plasma cells (14 months vs 2 months; p=0.045). Patients who achieved VGPR had a better OS than patients who did not (Not reached vs 3 months; p=0.000) as did patients who underwent auto transplant (Not reached vs 10 months; p=0.023). OS did not significantly differ with TP53 deletion status, or number of copies of 1q (3 or greater than 3). In the multi-variate analysis, presence of renal failure (Hazard ratio- 2.663; p-0.017) and &gt;5% circulating plasma cells (Hazard ratio- 3.082; p-0.020) were significantly associated with increased risk of mortality, while achievement of VGPR or better with therapy was associated with longer survival (Hazard ratio- 0.174; p-0.001). DISCUSSION The outcome of DH/THM remains poor in the real-world setting. The outcome was not affected by specific high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities or their combination in our study. Progressive disease within the first two months of diagnosis was the most common cause of death in more than 1/3 rd of the patients. Novel therapies and protocols are required to improve outcomes for this group of multiple myeloma patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of the Combination of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 580-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Bustoros, MD ◽  
Omar Nadeem ◽  
Adam S Sperling ◽  
Giada Bianchi ◽  
Lily Ardente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Background.This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods.Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al. (Blood 2014). The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 consecutive days for a total of 24 months period. Bone marrow samples of all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle for isolating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results.In total, 53 of the planned 62 patients have been enrolled in this study from February 2017 to May 2019. The median age of the patients enrolled was 61 years (range, 41 to 84) with 22 male (41.5%). The analysis was conducted on patients who have completed at least 1 cycle of therapy (n=45). The median follow-up for the trial is 14.4 months (range: 2- 27.6). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 37 patients (82.2%). High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 20 patients (54%). The median number of cycles completed was 14 cycles (range: 1-24). According to the study's inclusion criteria, baseline markers showed that 15, 14, and 13 patients had 3, 4, and 5 high-risk features, respectively. Moreover, 24 patients (53.3%) met the criteria of high-risk SMM, according to the Mayo 2018 model. The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypertension (6.3%), hypophosphatemia (4.2%), and rash (4.2%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were each reported in 4.4% of patients, and hyperglycemia was reported in 2.2%. Stem cells were collected in all eligible patients by the end of the induction phase. As of the abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who completed at least 1 cycle of treatment was 91.1% (41/45), with 14 Complete Responses (CR, 31.1%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 20%), 18 partial responses (40%), and 4 minimal Responses (MR, 10%). ORR in patients who completed the induction phase (≥9 cycles) was 97% (n= 32/33), with 14(42.4%) and 9 (27.2%) having CR and VGPR, respectively. All patients who had a CR have also achieved a stringent CR. Six patients have completed the treatment protocol and are currently on follow-up. As of July 2019, none of the patients have progressed to overt MM. MRD testing by next-generation sequencing is ongoing for patients who achieved CR or VGPR and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion.The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma with 91% ORR and 54.7% CR and VGPR to date. The high response rate, convenient schedule and manageable toxicity build on prior studies which have shown efficacy of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in high risk smoldering myeloma. Longer follow-up for disease outcome is ongoing. Disclosures Bustoros, MD: Takeda: Honoraria. Nadeem:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Prescott:Janssen: Equity Ownership. Munshi:Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Anderson:OncoPep: Other: Scientific founder ; C4 Therapeutics: Other: Scientific founder ; Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Advisory Board. Richardson:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone is an investigational combination in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma and has not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration or any other regulatory agency worldwide for the use under investigation.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Circulating Plasma Cells in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1808-1808
Author(s):  
Lijuan Chen ◽  
Jianyong Li
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches

Multiple myeloma (MM) is biologically diverse and there is a significant variation in survival time from a few months to several years. The presence of circulating plasma cells (CPCs) is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with MM. This study retrospectively analyzed CPCs by 8-color multi-parameter flow cytometry in 108 cases of newly diagnosed MM patients to investigate its value for outcome prediction. Among them, 58 (53.7%) patients were CPCs positive expression. The optimum cutoff predicting for overall survival was determined as 0.29% by using a ROC analysis. Compared with patients with CPCs < 0.29% (n = 75, 69.4%), those with CPCs ≥0.29% (n = 33, 30.6%) showed lower Erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) (P = 0.0032), but higher lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin (FER) , BM PCs and P53 deletion in BM by FISH (P = 0.001, 0.003, 0.014, and 0.001,respectively). With the median follow-up time 17 months (range, 2.0-37.0), the median PFS in the subgroups with CPCs<0.29% and ≥0.29% was not reached and17.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI):14.85-19.15), respectively, and the median OS was not reached and 12.5months (95% CI: 6.35-18.65), respectively. On multivariate analysis for OS, factors independently predictive of mortality were CPCs≥0.29% (hazard ratio (HR) 4.172; 95% CI, 1.61-10.79; P=0.003), Deletion P53(HR 11.54; 95% CI, 4.06-32.84; P<0.001). We further developed a convenient two-factor risk stratification based on CPCs and p53 deletion according to the results of log-rank test, univariate and multivariate analysis. The high-risk group was defined as both CPCs ≥ 0.29% and P53 deletion, accounting for 10% of the population, have a dire prognosis (median PFS = 5 months; OS = 10 months) despite modern therapies .These results identified CPCs as an unfavorable prediction for the outcome of MM. A combination of p53 deletion may screen out a high-risk subgroup which should be considered for novel therapeutic approaches. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Somatic Alterations in Multiple Myeloma Reveal a Superior Outcome Group

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3107-3118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kemal Samur ◽  
Anil Aktas Samur ◽  
Mariateresa Fulciniti ◽  
Raphael Szalat ◽  
Tessa Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Chromosome 9 ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Mutational Load ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Therapeutic Algorithms ◽  
Genomic Markers ◽  
Somatic Alterations

PURPOSE Multiple myeloma (MM) is accompanied by heterogeneous somatic alterations. The overall goal of this study was to describe the genomic landscape of myeloma using deep whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and develop a model that identifies patients with long survival. METHODS We analyzed deep WGS data from 183 newly diagnosed patients with MM treated with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVD) alone or RVD + autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in the IFM/DFCI 2009 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01191060 ). We integrated genomic markers with clinical data. RESULTS We report significant variability in mutational load and processes within MM subgroups. The timeline of observed activation of mutational processes provides the basis for 2 distinct models of acquisition of mutational changes detected at the time of diagnosis of myeloma. Virtually all MM subgroups have activated DNA repair–associated signature as a prominent late mutational process, whereas APOBEC signature targeting C>G is activated in the intermediate phase of disease progression in high-risk MM. Importantly, we identify a genomically defined MM subgroup (17% of newly diagnosed patients) with low DNA damage (low genomic scar score with chromosome 9 gain) and a superior outcome (100% overall survival at 69 months), which was validated in a large independent cohort. This subgroup allowed us to distinguish patients with low- and high-risk hyperdiploid MM and identify patients with prolongation of progression-free survival. Genomic characteristics of this subgroup included lower mutational load with significant contribution from age-related mutations as well as frequent NRAS mutation. Surprisingly, their overall survival was independent of International Staging System and minimal residual disease status. CONCLUSION This is a comprehensive study identifying genomic markers of a good-risk group with prolonged survival. Identification of this patient subgroup will affect future therapeutic algorithms and research planning.

scholarly journals Dynamic follow‐up of smoldering multiple myeloma identifies a subset of patients at high risk of progression

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Gran ◽  
Vincent Luong ◽  
Johanna B. Bruchfeld ◽  
Johan Liwing ◽  
Gabriel Afram ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Risk Of Progression
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document