Cardiac Amyloid Reaching for Extended Survival (CARES): Study Design of Two Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized, International Phase 3 Trials Assessing Cael-101 in Patients with Mayo Stage Iiia or Stage IIIb AL Amyloidosis

Abstract Background: Light-chain amyloidosis (AL-A) is a rare, severe, progressive, systemic disorder with high mortality caused by immunoglobulin (Ig) light chains that misfold and aggregate into amyloid fibrils that deposit in multiple organs, leading to progressive organ dysfunction/damage and death. Prognosis is poor for patients with cardiac involvement (characterized by high levels of cardiac troponin T and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide). Median survival is 24 and 4 months for Mayo Stage IIIa and IIIb AL-A, respectively, based on the 2013 European Modification of the 2004 Mayo Staging system. For most patients, standard of care (SOC) is anti-plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD) therapy to suppress plasma cell proliferation, halt generation of amyloidogenic free light chains, and stop deposition of new amyloid fibrils and further organ decline. However, a critical need exists for therapies that accelerate the removal of deposited fibrils. CAEL-101 is a monoclonal antibody that binds to misfolded Ig light chains in amyloid fibrils. In Phase 1 and 2, CAEL-101 (with and without concurrent PCD SOC) was well tolerated up to 1000 mg/m 2. Preliminary Phase 2 data (NCT04304144) suggest improvements in cardiac and renal biomarkers in some patients. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAEL-101 versus placebo when administered concurrently with SOC anti-PCD therapy in treatment-naïve patients with cardiac AL-A, Mayo Stages IIIb (NCT04504825; Study 1) or IIIa (NCT04512235; Study 2). Methods: These international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trials, initiated in 2020, are enrolling patients at over 70 sites in 14 countries. Newly diagnosed adults with AL-A stage IIIb or IIIa based on the 2013 European Modification of 2004 Mayo Staging (Wechalekar AD et al. Blood 2013;121:3420. Dispenzieri A, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22:3751), measurable hematologic disease, and histopathological diagnosis of amyloidosis with cardiac involvement are eligible. Patients cannot have any other form of amyloidosis, symptomatic orthostatic hypotension, or supine systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg. Patients in Mayo Stages IIIb (N=111) and IIIa (N=267) are randomized 2:1 to receive once-weekly intravenous infusions of CAEL-101 (1000 mg/m 2) or placebo for 4 weeks, followed by maintenance dosing every 2 weeks. In these event-driven studies, treatment will continue to a minimum of 54 deaths for Study 1 and 77 deaths for Study 2 (a minimum treatment duration of 12 months is expected). Patients will receive concurrent anti-PCD therapy per the institutional protocol for SOC and will be followed to death from any cause or until end of study (Figure). The primary endpoint is overall survival (defined as the time from first dose of study drug to date of death, with censoring at last known living date), and will be analyzed via time-to-event log-rank statistics. Functional, quality of life, and echocardiography measures are targeted secondary endpoints. Results: Patient baseline characteristics and demographics are presented (Table). As of July 17, 2021, 9/13 (69.2%) patients in Study 1 and 23/39 (59%) patients in Study 2 have received at least 4 doses of CAEL-101 concurrently with anti-PCD therapy. Discussion: These ongoing trials will evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAEL-101 as first-in-class treatment to reduce amyloid burden in patients with cardiac AL-A. Notably, Study 1 (Mayo Stage IIIb) is the first randomized, placebo-controlled efficacy clinical trial to formally assess the effects of a pharmacological in this severely ill population. Because the median expected survival for Mayo Stage IIIb patients is far shorter than for Mayo Stage IIIa patients, the resulting sample size required for the Mayo Stage IIIB study is less (111 patients) than for the Mayo Stage IIIA study (267 patients). Importantly, these studies include patients identified as Stage III and IV based on the 2012 Mayo staging system (Kumar S. et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:989). These trials are ongoing in a challenging environment. The approval of daratumumab in 2021 changed the landscape and modified the SOC, requiring appropriate protocol amendments. While the COVID pandemic affected all people, it had a greater impact on patients with AL amyloidosis, a rare disease that can only be treated effectively by a coordinated team of experts at centers of excellence. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wechalekar: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding. Silowsky: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Daniel: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Harnett: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Spector: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Sobolov: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Quarta: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Kurman: Caelum Biosciences: Other: Medical Monitor. Tulchinskiy: Caelum Biosciences: Consultancy. Bhattacharyya: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Liedtke: Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Trial Funding.

Download Full-text

Updated Organ Response Results of an Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Cael-101 in Patients with AL Amyloidosis Receiving Anti-Plasma Cell Therapy

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-148905 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2724-2724

Author(s):

Jason Valent ◽

John Silowsky ◽

Michael R. Kurman ◽

Eileen Daniel ◽

Janet Jobes ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Stage Iiia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Amyloid Deposits ◽

Response Range ◽

Organ Response ◽

Al Amyloid

Abstract Background: CAEL-101 is an IgG1 monoclonal antibody intended to enable immune clearance of AL amyloid deposits. This study (NCT04304144) data allowed dose selection of CAEL-101 for the ongoing Phase 3 studies in patients with Mayo stage IIIa and IIIb AL amyloidosis cardiomyopathy newly diagnosed and treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) alone or in combination with daratumumab. Methods: 13 patients were treated with CAEL-101 and CyBorD and an additional 5 patients were treated with CAEL-101, daratumumab, and CyBorD. Organ response data on assessable patients were evaluated per consensus criteria as per institutional standard of care. Safety, pharmacokinetic and anti-drug antibody data will be reported separately. Results: The follow up for patients receiving CAEL-101 and CyBorD is 12 to 15 months and for the CAEL-101, Daratumumab, and CyBorD is 4 to 6 months. 16 of 18 patients remain on treatment. One discontinuation was due to death from E. coli sepsis and the other due to lack of hematologic response with deterioration of heart function requiring heart transplant after only 6 doses of CAEL-101. Organ response in cardiac patients by NT pro BNP criteria occurred in 4 of 8 evaluable patients treated with CAEL-101 and CyBorD (time to organ response range 2 - 12 months) and in 2 of 3 patients treated with CAEL-101, daratumumab, and CyBorD (time to organ response range 3 - 5 months). Four patients have had repeat echocardiogram 1 year from start of CAEL-101 based therapy with interpretable global peak longitudinal strain (GLS). The GLS improved in 2 patients by -5% (-6.4% to -11.4%) and -5.1% (-12.8% to -17.9%). GLS remained stable in the other 2 patients. All 9 patients with evaluable kidney involvement by 24 hour urine protein achieved an organ response. Responses occurred in as little as 2 months in 5 patients (range 2 - 7 months). The time to organ response were similar in the daratumumab and non-daratumumab treated patients. One patient with hematologic stable disease and persistent 71% improvement in 24 hour urine protein at 10 months from start of CAEL-101 based therapy is most notable. Conclusions: CAEL-101 with anti-plasma cell therapy remains reasonably well tolerated with no unanticipated adverse effects. Organ responses, most notably renal response, have occurred early in the course of therapy and appears to be durable. Organ responses in some patients have also improved over time with some significant improvement in patient GLS evaluations by echocardiogram. These results encourage clinical trial participation in the ongoing CAEL-101 clinical trials in Mayo stage IIIa and IIIb AL amyloidosis patients. Disclosures Valent: Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Caelum Biosciences: Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau. Silowsky: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Kurman: Caelum Biosciences: Other: Medical Monitor. Daniel: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Jobes: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Harnett: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Spector: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Anwer: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS / Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Zonder: BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Caelum Biosciences: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Consultancy. Liedtke: Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sobolov: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. OffLabel Disclosure: CAEL-101 is a monoclonal antibody directed at AL amyloid deposits. The purpose is to promote immune clearance of amyloid deposits.

Download Full-text

Safety and Tolerability of Cael-101 in Combination with Anti-Plasma Cell Dyscrasia Therapy in Patients with AL Amyloidosis: 1-Year Results from an Open-Label Phase 2 Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153636 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 468-468

Author(s):

Jason Valent ◽

Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽

Michaela Liedtke ◽

John Silowsky ◽

Michael R. Kurman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Amyloid Fibrils ◽

Renal Involvement ◽

Plasma Cell Dyscrasia ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Open Label ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Phase 2 Trial

Abstract Background: AL amyloidosis, a rare, severe, progressive, systemic disorder caused by plasma cell dyscrasia (PCD), results in insoluble immunoglobulin light chain amyloid fibrils depositing in organs and causing significant dysfunction, morbidity, and mortality. Most patients receive anti-PCD therapy as standard of care (SOC) to suppress plasma cell proliferation and arrest the generation and deposition of new amyloid fibrils. At present, no approved therapies exist that target fibrils already deposited. CAEL-101, a monoclonal antibody, binds to amyloid light chain fibrils and promotes removal from tissues. In this Phase 2 trial, patients were treated with doses up to 1000 mg/m 2, combined with SOC, demonstrating this dose was well tolerated and appropriate for Phase 3. Aim: Evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of CAEL-101, administered with SOC in AL amyloidosis. Methods: Adult patients with confirmed AL amyloidosis diagnosis (Mayo Stages I, II, IIIa), 6-month minimum life expectancy, and measurable hematologic disease were eligible for this ongoing, open-label, phase 2 study (NCT04304144). Patients with other forms of amyloidosis, multiple myeloma, supine systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, or symptomatic orthostatic hypotension were excluded. All patients received CAEL-101 1000mg/m 2 every other week with SOC anti-PCD therapy until investigator decided anti-PCD was no longer needed (Figure). Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and physical examinations. Pharmacokinetic endpoints included maximum serum concentration (C max) and minimum serum concentration of CAEL-101 prior to next dose (C trough). Exploratory endpoints included biomarkers for cardiac function (cardiac troponin T [cTnT] and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]), and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria). Results: The 25 patients averaged 65.2 years (range 47 to 80), with the majority male (72.0%). Mayo Stages I (8.0%), II (76.0%), and IIIa (16.0%) reflected the wide range of disease severity in enrolled patients ; 19 (76.0%) presented with cardiac involvement, 8 (32.0%) with renal involvement, and 20 (80.0%) had received prior anti-PCD therapy. Twenty-four (96.0%) patients experienced TEAEs, but only 6 (24.0%) experienced a possibly treatment related TEAE (Table). Eight (32.0%) patients experienced at least 1 Grade ≥3 TEAE and 7 (28.0%) experienced at least 1 serious adverse event. There were 3 (12.0%) discontinuations; 1 death due to septic pneumonia (investigator determined not related to CAEL-101), one heart transplant, and one patient who withdrew consent. Most common TEAEs included nausea (9 [36.0%]], constipation (8 [32.0%]), and diarrhea, fatigue, or rash (7 [28.0%] each). Addition of daratumumab (n = 12) to the anti-PCD combination treatment of cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD) did not alter the pharmacokinetic or tolerability profile of CAEL-101. Of the 19 current cardiac evaluable patients (baseline NT-proBNP ≥332 ng/L and ≥1 post-first-dose NT-proBNP value), 15 (78.9%) have responded (≥ 30% NT-proBNP decrease from baseline) or are stable on CAEL-101 therapy. Renal evaluable patients, as determined by Investigator at a single site, showed a similar proteinuria response. Discussion: This ongoing trial is evaluating the long-term safety and tolerability of CAEL-101 administered with anti-PCD SOC as a treatment to reduce amyloid burden in patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis. CAEL-101 was well tolerated when administered with anti-PCD therapy. Most TEAEs observed were mild to moderate in severity and did not require intervention. There were no meaningful differences in tolerability or exposure to CAEL-101 when daratumumab was added to the anti-PCD regimen. Improvements in cardiac and renal response biomarkers were observed in most patients presenting with cardiac or renal involvement, respectively, at study entry. Conclusion: After approximately 1-year, CAEL-101, as part of an AL amyloidosis treatment strategy, demonstrates to be well tolerated. This updated report confirms previous findings for the use of CAEL-101 in combination with anti-PCD. A Phase 3 clinical program is ongoing to further elucidate the efficacy and safety of CAEL-101. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Valent: Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Caelum Biosciences: Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Celgene Corporation: Speakers Bureau. Zonder: Caelum Biosciences: Consultancy; Regeneron: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding. Liedtke: Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kura Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Clinical Trial Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Silowsky: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Kurman: Caelum Biosciences: Other: Medical Monitor. Daniel: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Jobes: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Harnett: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Raviwong: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Spector: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment. Sobolov: Caelum Biosciences: Current Employment.

Download Full-text

A Transgenic Mouse Model of Cardiac AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-146782 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1592-1592

Author(s):

Gemma Martinez-Rivas ◽

Maria Ayala ◽

Sebastien Bender ◽

Murielle Roussel ◽

Arnaud Jaccard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mouse Model ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Transgenic Mouse ◽

Amyloid Fibrils ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Transgenic Mouse Model ◽

Full Length ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees

Abstract Background: AL amyloidosis is the most frequent type of amyloidosis caused by the deposition in tissues of fibrillar aggregates composed of an abnormal immunoglobulin (Ig) light chain (LC) and leading to organ dysfunction. The most frequent and severe forms involve kidney and heart. Research on this disease suffers from the lack of reliable animal models, that could allow a better understanding of the disease and the design of new therapeutic strategies. In the present study, we aimed at reproducing AL amyloidosis in a mouse model. Methods: We developed an original transgenic approach using an insertion of a human pathogenic LC gene in the endogenous mouse kappa locus, such as the LC is produced by the naturally Ig producing B and plasma cells. Then, to avoid the association of human LCs with endogenous murine HCs, we backcrossed this strain with the DH-LMP2A mice, characterized by a high number of plasma cells devoid of endogenous HC. This strategy leads to a production of the human free LC similar or higher than in patients and proved efficient to reproduce in mice several monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance (MGCS) (Fig.1A). Results: Despite strong LC production (Fig.1B), mice did not naturally develop AL amyloidosis. In vitro, the full length LC was resistant to amyloid formation at physiological conditions but the variable domain (IGLV6) showed high propensity to form fibrils. A single injection of amyloid fibrils and/or seeds, obtained from the variable domain (VL) of the human LC gene, led to amyloid deposits starting at 1 month post-injection, especially in the heart, spleen, liver and, to a lesser extent, in the kidney (Fig.1C). We confirmed that the deposits contain the full-length human LCs, which elongate VL fibrils in vivo (Fig.1D). Conclusions: This is, to our knowledge, the first transgenic mouse model of AL amyloidosis closely reproducing human lesions, especially in heart. Further studies are needed to better understand the early biochemical events leading to AL amyloidosis in vivo, but this model already shows that a partial degradation of the LC is likely required to initiate amyloid fibrils and that once seeded, the full length LC can elongate these fibrils. This mouse model opens new perspectives to better understand the toxicity of amyloid LC, their involvements in different biological processes and organ dysfunction and of course, to test new therapeutic approaches. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Roussel: Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy. Jaccard: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Bridoux: Janssen: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sirac: Attralus, Inc: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Results of Phase I Study of Chimeric Fibril-Reactive Monoclonal Antibody 11-1F4 in Patients with AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.188.188 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 188-188 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Arielle L Langer ◽

Susanna Miao ◽

Markus Mapara ◽

Jai Radhakrishnan ◽

Mathew S. Maurer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Phase I ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Dose Level ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Amyloid Deposits ◽

Organ Response

Abstract Background: The murine (Mu) monoclonal antibody (mAb) 11-1F4 prepared against human light-chain-related fibrils recognizes an amyloid-associated conformational epitope when administered to mice bearing human AL amyloidomas and elicits a neutrophil/macrophage response that led to rapid and complete elimination of the amyloid tumors with no evidence of toxicity in the animals. PET/CT using I-124 labeled Mu mAb 11-1F4 revealed uptake by the organs known to contain amyloid in the majority of patients studied.1,2 These results led to production of GMP-grade amyloid fibril-reactive chimeric (Ch) IgG1 mAb 11-1F4 by the NCI's Biological Resource Branch for a Phase I clinical trial in patients with AL amyloidosis. Methods: This is an open-label, dose-escalation Phase I clinical trial of Ch IgG1 mAb 11-1F4 in patients with relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis. The trial was conducted under the auspices of an Experimental Therapeutic Investigational New Drug (IND) with a primary objective of defining the maximum tolerated dose, and tolerability and safety of Ch IgG1 mAb 11-1F4 when given as a single intravenous infusion. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, safety, and organ response. Patients were eligible if they had received prior systemic therapy for relapsed or refractory AL-Amyloidosis or had declined or were ineligible for standard systemic therapy and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Patients were excluded if they had ventricular ejection fraction less than 40 percent, an interventricular septal thickness greater than 25mm, a history of sustained ventricular tachycardiac or cardiac arrest, 24 hour creatinine clearance of less than 30cc/min, alkaline phosphatase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, or total bilirubin greater than 3.0mg/dL. A dose-escalation "up and down" design was used with 7 sequential doses of 0.5, 5, 10, 50, 100, 250 and 500 mg/m2. Results: As of July 14, 2015, dose level 6 was completed including six patients who completed the study. Two patients had primarily cardiac, 2 patients primarily skin, and 2 primarily gastrointestinal (GI) involvement. All patients tolerated the dose received and no grade 3, 4 adverse events (AE) or deaths occurred. The AE included: dose level 5, one patient with grade 1 nausea and diarrhea and at dose level 4 one patient grade 2 rash for 11 days. Skin biopsy revealed previously undiagnosed cutaneous amyloid deposits and a neutrophilic infiltrate that may represent proof of antibody binding amyloid fibrils. Though the primary objective of the trial was to evaluate safety, 3 of 6 patient had evidence of organ response (2 cardiac and 1 GI) after only one infusion of Ch IgG1 mAb 11-1F4. Conclusions: To date, Ch IgG1 mAb 11-1F4 was well tolerated by all study subjects without any adverse reactions and promising organ response after completion of 6 dose levels. Development of an AL-fibril-specific mAb treatment would be an invaluable adjunct in the treatment of patients with AL amyloidosis and lead to improved medical management of this incurable and ultimately fatal disease. Clinical Trial Information: NCT02245867 References Wall, J., Kennel, S.J., Stuckey, A.C., Long, M.J, Townsend, D.W., Smith, G.T., Wells, K.J., Fu, Y., Stabin, M.G., Weiss, D.T., and Solomon, A. Radioimmunodetection of amyloid deposits in patients with AL amyloidosis, Blood. 116: 2241-2244, 2010.Solomon, Alan. Personal Communication. Apr 2014. Disclosures Lentzsch: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Axiom: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Monoclonal antibody 11-1F4 is the drug under investigation in this trial as a therapy for amyloidosis. It currently has no FDA approved indication..

Download Full-text

The VITAL Amyloidosis Study: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Global, Phase 3 Study of NEOD001 in Patients with AL Amyloidosis and Cardiac Dysfunction

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.5690.5690 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 5690-5690 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Michaela Liedtke ◽

Giampaolo Merlini ◽

Heather Landau ◽

Raymond L. Comenzo ◽

Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Cardiac Dysfunction ◽

Research Funding ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Double Blind ◽

6Mwt Distance ◽

Equity Ownership

Abstract Background: Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is caused by the deposition of misfolded light chain (LC) proteins, which may cause organ failure and death. Current treatments, which target the plasma cells that produce LC, induce organ responses in only 30% to 40% of patients. There is a substantial need for a safe and effective amyloid-directed therapy to improve recovery of organ function. NEOD001, a monoclonal antibody that targets misfolded LC, is hypothesized to neutralize circulating LC aggregates and to clear insoluble organ deposits. In an ongoing phase 1/2 study (NCT02613182; Gertz M et al. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(10):1097-1103) in 27 patients with AL amyloidosis and persistent organ dysfunction, monthly NEOD001 infusions were well tolerated and produced no infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions. In a best response analysis of subjects who fulfilled eligibility criteria at baseline, 57% met cardiac and 60% met renal response criteria. Supported by these positive results, the current study (VITAL; NCT02312206) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial of NEOD001 in patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis. Here we present the study design for this trial in progress. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients (estimated enrollment, 236) with a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis (newly diagnosed, treatment naive) and cardiac dysfunction (N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] ≥650 and <8500 pg/mL, clinical signs of heart failure, left ventricular wall thickness >12 mm, or cardiac biopsy-detected amyloidosis) and with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive NEOD001 (24 mg/kg q28d) plus standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy or placebo plus SOC therapy. Subjects will be stratified according to Mayo Clinic stage, renal stage, and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance. The primary end point is a composite, evidence-based measure consisting of all-cause mortality or cardiac hospitalization. Key secondary end points include cardiac response measured by NT-proBNP (as defined by Comenzo RL et al. Leukemia. 2012;26(11):2317-2325) and change in 6MWT distance, Short Form-36 Health Survey response, Neuropathy Impairment Score-Lower Limb and renal response (as defined by Palladini G et al. Blood. 2014;124(15):2325-2332). Disclosures Liedtke: Gilead: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Merlini:Takeda and Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Landau:Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx/Amgen: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Comenzo:Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Sanchorawala:Prothena: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Weiss:Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodations; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Prothena: Other: Travel, accommodations, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Zonder:Array Biopharma: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy. Walling:Stealth: Consultancy; KaloBios: Consultancy; Exelixis: Consultancy; Newgen: Consultancy; Mateon (was Oxigene): Consultancy; Apex: Consultancy; Corcept: Consultancy; Aduro: Consultancy; Prothena: Consultancy; BioMarin: Equity Ownership; Amgen: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; NuMedii: Consultancy; Pharm-Olam: Consultancy; Crown Bioscience: Consultancy; Codexis: Consultancy; Upsher Smith: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties. Kinney:Prothena: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Leadership. Koller:Prothena: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Travel, accommodations. Gertz:Ionis: Research Funding; Prothena Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Annexon Biosciences: Research Funding; Research to Practice: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Med Learning Group: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; NCI Frederick: Honoraria; Sandoz Inc: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Unexpected Toxicities When Nivolumab Was Given after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123887 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1956-1956

Author(s):

Amy Wang ◽

Justin Kline ◽

Wendy Stock ◽

Satyajit Kosuri ◽

Andrew S. Artz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Overall Survival ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Relapsed Disease

Background:Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with hematologic malignancies who relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We hypothesized that checkpoint inhibitors may offer a novel approach for maintaining remission after allo-SCT. Data from pre-clinical studies have suggested a potential role for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Zhang et al., Blood 2009), so it is possible that immunomodulation with checkpoint inhibitors could stimulate the donor anti-leukemia immune response and prevent disease relapse. However, the safety of checkpoint blockade early after allografting remains to be established. Methods:We conducted a pilot study to assess the tolerability and efficacy of Nivolumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, as maintenance therapy after allo-SCT (NCT02985554). Pts were eligible if they were post allo-SCT without evidence of relapse or active graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) or history of prior greater than stage I skin acute GVHD. Nivolumab was to be administered intravenously at 1mg/kg every 2 weeks for 4 doses followed by dosing every 12 weeks. Treatment started 4 weeks after routine immunosuppression was discontinued until 2 years after the transplant. The primary objective was to determine the tolerability of Nivolumab on this schedule. Secondary objectives were evaluation of adverse events, relapse, and overall survival. Results:Four pts were enrolled from December 2017 through November 2018. (Table 1)All pts experienced immune-related adverse events (irAE) from Nivolumab, and 2 (50%) pts experienced serious adverse events. (Table 2)One pt developed grade (G) 4 neutropenia soon after the first dose. (Figure 1)The absolute neutrophil count nadired at 20 cells/µL, at which point pegfilgrastim was administered. An interim bone marrow biopsy (BMBx) confirmed no evidence of relapsed disease. Full neutrophil recovery occurred approximately 3 months after the initial dose, and no subsequent toxicities occurred. Another pt developed G3 autoimmune encephalopathy concurrently with G2 transaminitis and G2 thrombocytopenia after one dose of Nivolumab. (Figure 2)Intravenous methylprednisolone (1mg/kg daily for 3 days) and immunoglobulin (2g/kg in 4 divided doses) were administered, followed by a 7-week steroid taper with full resolution of symptoms. Relapsed disease was ruled out by a BMBx. A third pt developed G2 skin rash approximately 10 days after the first dose of Nivolumab. Skin biopsy demonstrated drug hypersensitivity reaction vs GVHD, and the pt was treated with a 3-week prednisone course (starting at 1mg/kg followed by a taper). A mild flare recurred 2 weeks later, which was treated with topical steroids only. However, Nivolumab was not resumed. The fourth pt developed G2 elevated TSH approximately 2 months into therapy and after 4 doses of Nivolumab. Thyroid hormone replacement was initiated with subsequent symptom improvement and normalization of TSH over a 4-month period. As a result of these unexpected severe toxicities, the study was closed to further enrollment, and further Nivolumab administration ceased. Thus far, one pt (#1) relapsed after a total remission duration of 530 days; the remission duration after starting Nivolumab was 318 days. One pt has mild chronic skin GVHD. All 4 patients remain alive with a median overall survival of 2.3 years (range, 1.9-4.7). Conclusions:Even at low doses, the use of Nivolumab as maintenance therapy in the post allo-SCT setting was not tolerable at the current dosing and schedule due to an unexpected number of high grade irAEs. Additional studies of dose and timing after allo-SCT are needed to improve safety and tolerability, in conjunction with correlative studies to better understand the immunomodulatory processes in the post-transplant setting. Disclosures Kline: Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Larson:Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials; Celgene: Consultancy. Riedell:Novartis: Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bishop:CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liu:Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; BMS: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial; Karyopharm: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Nivolumab used as maintenance therapy in the post-transplant setting

Download Full-text

Favorable Long-Term Outcomes after Daratumumab Discontinuation in AL Amyloidosis Patients Achieving Deep Responses

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124981 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1884-1884 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Alfred Chung ◽

Gregory P. Kaufman ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

David Iberri ◽

Erik Eckhert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Progression ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Control Group ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Free Interval ◽

Significant Difference

Daratumumab (DARA) is a CD38-targeted antibody FDA-approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) and its efficacy has recently been demonstrated in the treatment of AL amyloidosis. DARA is conventionally given indefinitely until evidence of disease progression or intolerance for the treatment of MM. In AL amyloidosis, the optimal duration of therapy is not known, and patients may be treated indefinitely on maintenance, extrapolating from MM data. However, the plasma cell burden observed in AL amyloidosis is often lower than in MM, and thus certain patients achieving deep responses may have durable responses with time-limited treatment. Outcomes for patients who are observed after DARA discontinuation are not known. We report the outcomes of patients at our institution who received time-limited DARA. A retrospective analysis of AL amyloidosis patients treated at Stanford University from 2016 to 2019 with DARA monotherapy and dexamethasone for at least 2 months was performed, and patients who subsequently had DARA discontinued for reasons other than disease progression or lack of response were selected for the study. Hematologic responses were assessed by consensus guidelines. Duration on and off therapy were explored, along with time-to-next treatment or death (TTNT), defined as the time from DARA initiation to restarting/switching therapy or death. An exploratory analysis comparing TTNT between the study population and a control cohort who achieved hematologic CR and were maintained on DARA was conducted with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank testing. 67 patients received at least 2 months of DARA monotherapy and dexamethasone; among these, 15 patients discontinued therapy for reasons other than disease progression and were included. Median age was 66 years old and median lines of prior therapies was 4 (range: 1 - 6). Baseline difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC) prior to DARA initiation was 2.6 mg/dL (range: 0 - 16.8 mg/dL). 10 of 15 patients had cardiac involvement with median NT-proBNP of 1982 pg/mL and 9 of 15 patients had renal involvement with median 24-hour proteinuria of 6.2 g and eGFR of 32 mL/min/1.73m2 at DARA initiation. Median duration from starting to stopping DARA was 7.8 months (range: 2 - 21 months). Median duration from achieving best hematologic response to stopping DARA was 3 months (range: 0 - 17 months). Reasons for discontinuation included: patient preference (5), fatigue/body aches (4), infection (2), other active medical comorbidities (3), and lack of perceived further benefit (1). At DARA discontinuation, median dFLC was 0.1 mg/dL (range: 0 - 2.2 mg/dL) and there were 12 hematologic CR, 1 VGPR, 1 PR, and 1 not assessable for response. Outcomes for all 15 patients are shown in Figure 1. The median treatment-free interval was 17.5 months (range: 5 - 34 months); estimated 2-year TTNT-free survival was 83% (95% CI: 61 - 100%). All 14 evaluable patients eventually achieved CR. 3 patients restarted DARA for rising dFLC, and all 3 patients demonstrated response to retreatment (2 achieving CR and 1 near PR with ongoing follow-up). There were 2 deaths. One patient with severe baseline cardiac amyloidosis developed sudden rise in dFLC after treatment-free interval of 21 months; although he rapidly achieved hematologic CR on retreatment, he died of heart failure within 2 months of restarting DARA. The other patient developed therapy-related AML while off therapy and underwent allogenic stem cell transplant but died of leukemia (censored for AL amyloidosis outcomes at transplant). There was no significant difference in the TTNT between the study group and a control group of 16 patients who achieved CR and were on continuous maintenance (Figure 2; p=0.807). AL amyloidosis patients achieving deep responses with DARA can have favorable outcomes after treatment discontinuation, including a long treatment-free interval. Although our sample size is small, the outcomes of these patients appeared comparable to those achieving CR on continuous DARA maintenance, and patients were able to regain responses when retreatment was necessary. These results suggest that DARA may be safely discontinued in patents achieving deep hematologic responses, which has significant implications for quality of life and financial burden of treatment. Future studies evaluating time-limited versus continuous DARA maintenance after achievement of deep responses are warranted. Disclosures Kaufman: Janssen: Other: travel/lodging, Research Funding. Liedtke:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IQVIA/Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab for treatment of AL amyloidosis

Download Full-text

Long-Term Survival Benefit of Eculizumab Treatment in Patients with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria: Data from the International PNH Registry

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-153560 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 2188-2188

Author(s):

Louis Terriou ◽

Christopher J. Patriquin ◽

Morag Griffin ◽

Jong Wook Lee ◽

Philippe Gustovic ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rare Disease ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Survival Probability ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Term Survival ◽

Treatment Status ◽

History Of ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Eculizumab, the first C5 inhibitor approved for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), transformed PNH treatment by improving survival to that of an age- and sex- matched general population. Previous analyses demonstrating the survival benefit of eculizumab in patients with PNH leveraged historical data and were limited by small patient numbers and short follow-up durations; few evaluated survival of patients receiving eculizumab compared with untreated patients. The objective of the current analysis was to describe the baseline characteristics and overall survival of a large international cohort of eculizumab-treated patients compared with a contemporaneous untreated cohort using data from the prospective, observational International PNH Registry (NCT01374360). Methods Data from patients enrolled in the Registry after March 16, 2007 with complete information for birth date, sex, enrollment date, and treatment status were included (database cut-off, April 12, 2021). Ever-treated patients were those who received eculizumab for a minimum treatment period of 35 days while enrolled in the Registry; never-treated patients did not receive eculizumab at any time before or during Registry participation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards that incorporated the following parameters at baseline as covariates: treatment status, presence of high disease activity (HDA), age, sex, history of bone marrow failure (BMF), history of thrombotic events (TE), transfusion dependence, and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m 2. HDA was defined as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ratio ≥1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and ≥1 of the following: history of major adverse vascular events (including TE); anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL), or physician-documented abdominal pain, dyspnea, dysphagia, fatigue, hemoglobinuria, or erectile dysfunction at any time before and including baseline. Baseline was defined as the date of eculizumab treatment initiation (ever-treated patients) or date of Registry enrollment (never-treated patients). Survival time was analyzed using a left-truncation approach that mapped time in patients' survival based on disease start date, defined as the earliest date of first-reported PNH diagnosis, PNH symptom, or first consistent flow cytometry result. Results Baseline characteristics of the 4627 patients included in the analysis (mean [SD] age at disease start, 40.2 [18.71] years; 53% female; 75% white) were comparable between the ever-treated and never-treated groups (n=1892 and n=2735, respectively). Compared with never-treated patients, more ever-treated patients had LDH ≥1.5 × ULN (90% vs 35%), and fewer had <10% PNH granulocytes (3% vs 57%) or history of BMF (45% vs 76%). The univariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in ever-treated vs never-treated patients was 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.60; P<0.0001), indicating a 52% increase in survival in the treated group (Table). Among ever-treated patients, those with HDA at baseline experienced the largest reduction in mortality risk (HR [95% CI], 0.46 [0.33-0.64]; n=174); however, decreased mortality was also evident in ever-treated patients without HDA (HR, 0.65 [0.39-1.10]; n=212) or with unknown HDA status (HR, 0.50 [0.32-0.76; n=120) at baseline. Overall survival probability by treatment status was consistently greater in ever-treated vs never-treated patients through 20 years of follow-up; survival probability at 20 years was 82% (ever-treated) vs 69% (never-treated). Although long-term survival probability was greatest throughout follow-up in ever-treated patients with HDA at baseline, increased survival among ever-treated patients was evident in all 3 HDA status groups (Figure). Conclusion In this analysis of Registry data, treatment with the C5 inhibitor eculizumab improved patient survival compared with a never-treated cohort at a comparable time point in their disease course. Covariates were assessed at baseline only and competing risks and time on treatment were not controlled for, which are potential limitations. Survival benefits conferred by eculizumab treatment were observed regardless of HDA status at baseline, were more pronounced in treated patients with HDA vs those without HDA, and were maintained through 2 decades of real-world follow-up. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Terriou: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Patriquin: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biocryst: Honoraria; Apellis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria. Griffin: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioCryst Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Apellis: Other: Educational grant support. Lee: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gustovic: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Patel: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Szer: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Apellis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Prevail Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Long-Term Outcomes and Organ Responses with Daratumumab Therapy in Previously Treated Patients with AL Amyloidosis

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-122152 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1828-1828

Author(s):

Alfred Chung ◽

Gregory P. Kaufman ◽

Surbhi Sidana ◽

Erik Eckhert ◽

Stanley Schrier ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cardiac Response ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Renal Response ◽

Cardiac Responses ◽

Previously Treated

Introduction: AL amyloidosis involves deposition of abnormally folded light chains into a wide range of tissues causing end-organ dysfunction, including in the heart and kidney. Daratumumab, a CD38-targeted antibody, has recently demonstrated efficacy in producing hematologic responses in previously relapsed/refractory disease. However, data on long-term outcomes to daratumumab, including organ responses, are lacking. Here we present the largest retrospective study to date on patients with previously treated AL amyloidosis treated with daratumumab. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis patients treated at Stanford University from January 2016 to January 2019. Patients treated with daratumumab, either as monotherapy with dexamethasone (DMT) or in combination with other plasma-cell directed therapies (DCT) were included. Hematologic and organ responses were assessed by consensus guidelines. Hematologic responses were based on the maximal change in the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC). For cardiac response, a >30% and >300 pg/mL decrease in NT-proBNP for patients with initial baseline NT-proBNP ≥650 pg/mL was considered a response. A graded cardiac response metric was also explored with partial response (PR) representing 30-59% reduction, very good partial response (VGPR) ≥60% reduction, and complete response (CR) NT-proBNP <450 pg/mL as previously reported. For renal response, a >30% decrease (by at least 0.5 g/day) in 24-hour urine protein without worsening in creatinine or creatinine clearance by more than 25% in patients with at least 0.5 g/day pretreatment was considered a response. A graded renal response metric was also explored with PR representing 30-59% reduction in proteinuria, VGPR ≥60%, and CR ≤ 200 mg per 24-hour period. Survival data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. All time-to-event outcomes, including survival and organ responses, were determined from initiation of daratumumab. Results: Eighty-four patients were identified with baseline characteristics at start of daratumumab shown in Table 1. Median duration of follow-up was 16 months. Two-year overall survival (OS) was 83% and median OS was not reached. Median time-to-next-treatment or death was 31 months. Sixty-seven out of 80 evaluable patients (84%) achieved a hematologic response, with 47 patients (59%) achieving a VGPR or better (Figure 1). Sixty-eight patients (81%) had cardiac involvement, and among the 34 evaluable patients, 18 (53%) of evaluable patients achieved a cardiac response with a median response time of 2 months among responders. In terms of a graded cardiac response, 6 patients (18%) were able to achieve cardiac CR, 5 patients (15%) cardiac VGPR, and 7 patients (21%) PR (Figure 2). The median NT-proBNP percent reduction was 64.5% (IQR: 48.3 - 81.1%) and the median absolute reduction was 2395 pg/mL (IQR 1279.5 - 4089.5 pg/mL). Cardiac responses were associated with an improvement in OS (p<0.001, Figure 3), with landmark analysis for cardiac responses at 6-month trending towards statistical significance (100% vs. 51% at 30 months, p=0.052). Fifty-three patients (63%) had renal involvement, and among the 26 evaluable patients, 12 patients (46%) achieved a renal response with a median initial response time of 6 months among responders. Using graded response, 1 patient (4%) achieved renal CR, 7 patients (27%) renal VGPR, 4 patients (15%) renal PR, and 14 patients had no response, worsening creatinine, or were subsequently started on hemodialysis (54%) (Figure 4). The median percent reduction in proteinuria was 74.1% (IQR: 49.2 - 83.1%) and the median absolute reduction in proteinuria was 3.1 g/24 hours (IQR 2.1 - 4.9 g) among responders. There were no significant differences in OS between renal responders and non-responders. Conclusion: Daratumumab is highly effective in the treatment of previously treated AL amyloidosis, and a significant proportion of patients can achieve durable hematologic responses as well as improvements in organ function. Disclosures Kaufman: Janssen: Other: travel/lodging, Research Funding. Liedtke:Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; IQVIA/Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Caelum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueBirdBio: Research Funding; Amgen/Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab in AL amyloidosis

Download Full-text

Melphalan and Dexamethasone Plus Bortezomib Induces Hematologic and Organ Responses in AL-Amyloidosis with Tolerable Neurotoxicity.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.746.746 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 746-746 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jeffrey A Zonder ◽

Vaishali Sanchorawala ◽

Rachel M. Snyder ◽

Jeffrey Matous ◽

Howard Terebelo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peripheral Neuropathy ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Dose Adjustment ◽

Response Rate ◽

Al Amyloidosis ◽

Two Stage ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Subsequent Dose ◽

Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 746 Introduction: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is a monoclonal plasma cell disorder associated with progressive organ dysfunction and short survival. Standard therapy for patients (pts) not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is melphalan (Mel; M) + dexamethasone (Dex; D). With non-ASCT therapy, the median overall survival (OS) of high-risk AL pts remains < 1 yr. After the VISTA study showed the addition of bortezomib (Bz) to Mel + Prednisone improved response rate, complete response rate, response duration, and OS in pts with myeloma, we designed this study to determine if adding Bz to MD improves outcomes in AL. Key eligibility criteria: ECOG PS ≤ 3, Cr ≤ 5 mg/dL, T.Bili ≤ 2.5 x IULN, ALT/AST ≤ 3 x IULN, ANC ≥ 1.0 K/mm3, PLT ≥ 80 K/mm3, peripheral neuropathy (PN) ≤ Gr 2 (≤ 1 if painful), no lower limit for LVEF. Study design: Two-stage Phase II study. Stage I: 16 pts with biopsy-proven AL or light chain deposition disease (LCDD). 1° endpoint: complete hematologic responses (cHR). If ≥5 cHRs observed, then 2nd stage with 17 more pts to be opened. The study has a 90% power to detect a true cHR rate of 50%. 2° endpoints include overall HR (cHR + Partial Responses (PR)), organ response (OrR), and OS. Treatment: M (9 mg/m2 PO days 1-4; 6 mg/m2 if Cr > 2.5 mg/dL), Bz (1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 8, 15, 22; 1.0 mg/m2 if pt has PN at baseline) and D (40 mg PO/IV days of & days after Bz; 20 mg if ≥ 70 yrs, peripheral edema, or CHF) in 4-6 wk cycles, max of 20 cycles. PN was assessed serially with the FACT/GOG-Ntx survey. Results: To date, 23 pts have been enrolled: 21 with AL; 2 with LCDD. Med age 64 (range: 47-76). Med # prior Rx: 1 (range: 0-2; 7 with ≥1 prior ASCT). Med # organs involved: 4 (range 1-6; 8 pts with ≥ 3). PS 0-1/2-3: 18/1. Response data for the 16 pts comprising stage 1 of this two-stage study are reported here; accrual of all 33 pts is expected to be complete by ASH, and results will be updated. One pt who was not response-evaluable (RE) for HR is included in toxicity data (n=17). Med # cycles MD-Bz: 4+ (range: 2-12+; 9 pts still on treatment). 15 of 16 pts had heme responses: 6 cHRs & 9 PRs. Ten RE pts had OrR (2 cardiac, 3 renal, 6 nerve, 1 lung; total >10 because some pts improved in > 1 organ). Nerve symptom improvement occurred exclusively in pts with cHR. Two pts had progressive disease (PD). Two pts died (4.5 and 9 mos from enrollment, from pneumonia and PD, respectively). Despite baseline dose adjustment for co-morbidities, 12 pts needed subsequent dose-reduction of ≥ 1 of the study meds during therapy (10 Bz, for thrombocytopenia and/or PN in almost all cases). Five pts developed neutropenia (Gr 3-4: 1), 15 pts developed thrombocytopenia (Gr 3-4: 11). Nine pts developed peripheral neuropathy (Gr 3: 2). Other grade 3-4 non-hematologic AEs seen in ≥ 2 pts included edema (5), syncope (3), SVT (2), dehydration (2), fatigue (2), and renal failure (2). One pt developed reversible cardiomyopathy (cycle 8) attributed to Bz. Calculated sensory/dysfunction (S/D) composite scores based on patient responses from the FACT/GOG-Ntx survey improved in 7 of 14 pts between cycles 1 and 4, were stable in 4 pts and worsened in only 3. On average, the S/D score accounted for 43% of each pt's total Ntx score at baseline, whereas it only accounted for 39% of the score after 4 cycles, and 45% after 8 cycles, indicating progressive disability from Bz-related PN was uncommon. As results of nerve conduction studies did not correlate well with reported symptoms or FACT/GOG-Ntx scores in stage 1 of the study, mandatory EMGs were discontinued in stage 2. Conclusions: MD-Bz shows promising activity in the treatment of AL, with 94% of pts in the first stage of this trial achieving HR (38% cHR) and evidence of OrR observed in 63%. Toxicity is manageable, but meds often require baseline or subsequent dose adjustment. A randomized study of MD +/- Bz in AL is planned. Disclosures: Zonder: Cephalon: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speaking CME Only, No PromotionalTalks; Celgene: Speaking CME only; no Promotional Talks. Off Label Use: Bortezomib is being used in the treatment of AL amyloidosis in this trial; it is currently approved for use as treatment of multiple myeloma.. Matous:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Janakiraman:Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mapara:Resolyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Cephalon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, My Wife: Suzanne Lentzsch, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, My wife: Suzanne Lentzsch, Research Funding; Sentium: Stocks. Gasparetto:Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text