scholarly journals Prognostic Impacts of Additional Cytogenetic Abnormalities Acquired at the First Relapse in Adult Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in Second Complete Remission

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3380-3380
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Shimizu ◽  
Junichi Mukae ◽  
Naoki Shingai ◽  
Takashi Toya ◽  
Yuho Najima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Cytogenetic Changes ◽  
Conditioning Regimens ◽  
First Relapse

Abstract Background: Additional cytogenetic abnormalities (ACA), the most frequent form of cytogenetic changes, are considered as a result of genetic instability and clonal evolution of leukemia cells. Recently, we described that ACA at the first relapse was associated with the significantly lower second complete remission (CR2) rate and poor survival in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (Hematol Oncol. 2018;36:252-257). However, the prognostic impact of ACA after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) has not been elucidated in adult AML patients. Patients and methods: Of the 145 adult AML patients who underwent the first allo-SCT in CR2 between 1997 and 2019, 98 patients whose cytogenetic abnormality data both at diagnosis and at the first relapse were available were included in this study. Cytogenetic changes between at diagnosis and the first relapse were classified into four groups: (1) no change, (2) ACA was acquired at the first relapse, (3) cytogenetic abnormalities observed at diagnosis were reduced or had disappeared at the first relapse, and (4) cytogenetic abnormalities observed at diagnosis were reduced or had disappeared, and completely different ACA was acquired at the first relapse. In this study, groups 2 and 4 were defined as ACA acquisition. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the date of transplant to the date of death. Fisher's exact test was used to compare binary variables. The cumulative incidence (CI) of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were evaluated with Gray's test, considering relapse and NRM as a competing risk, respectively. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Factors associated with at least borderline significance (p < 0.20) in univariate analyses were subjected to multivariate analysis. The Cox and Fine-Gray proportional hazard model were used for multivariate analysis of prognostic and risk factors, respectively. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: Of the 98 patients included in this study, 57 were male, and 41 were female. The median age at transplant was 45 years (range, 17-71 years). The median duration of CR1 was 12.4 months (range, 1.3-70.3 months) and cytogenetic risk groups were good, intermediate, and poor in 26 (27%), 70 (71%), and two patients (2%), respectively. Donor types were related, unrelated, and cord blood in 23 (24%), 59 (60%), and 16 patients (16%), respectively, and 86 (87%) and 61 patients (62%) were conditioned with myeloablative and total body irradiation-containing regimens, respectively. According to the definition described above, 20 patients (20%) acquired ACA at the first relapse. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics and transplant procedures between patients with and without ACA acquisition. The OS rates were not significantly different between two groups (55% vs. 72% at three years after transplant; p = 0.28). The CI of relapse was significantly higher in patients with ACA acquisition than those without ACA acquisition (59% vs. 15%; p < 0.01), while the CI of NRM were not significantly different between two groups (5% vs. 19%; p = 0.17). Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that age over 50 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.4; p < 0.01), but not ACA acquisition, was identified as an independent prognostic factor. ACA acquisition (HR = 4.7; p < 0.01) was extracted as an independent risk factor of relapse, while use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens (HR = 3.1; p = 0.03) and more than or equal to 1 of performance status at transplant (HR = 2.7; p = 0.04) showed independent risks of NRM. The similar OS rates between two groups might resulted from an offset of the lower relapse rate with the higher NRM rate in patients without ACA acquisition despite not reaching statistical significance. This increasing NRM rates in those without ACA acquisition was potentially associated with use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens in larger proportion (0% vs. 15%; p = 0.12). Conclusion: These findings suggested that ACA acquisition at the first relapse was associated with a higher risk of relapse even after allo-SCT in CR2 in adult AML patients. As AML cells with ACA acquisition was resistant to not only chemotherapy but also graft-versus-leukemia effect, innovative therapeutic strategy is warranted. Disclosures Handa: Janssen: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Chugai: Research Funding; Ono: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; MSD: Research Funding; Shionogi: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Clonal Cytogenetic Heterogeneity (CCH) at Diagnosis in Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2820-2820
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Shimizu ◽  
Nahoko Hatsumi ◽  
Satoru Takada ◽  
Takuma Ishizaki ◽  
Akihiko Yokohama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Common Ancestry ◽  
Complex Karyotype ◽  
Abnormal Karyotype ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities

Abstract Background:Although cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis are recognized as one of the most potent prognostic factors in acute leukemia patients, CCH acquisition at diagnosis, which are considered as a result of clonal evolution of leukemia cells, is not taken into account in prognostic classifications. Recent studies reported that CCH acquisition was observed in 24 - 32% of adult AML patients with abnormal karyotype, was more likely to occur in patients with older age and complex karyotype, and showed adverse prognostic impact. However, the clinical significance of CCH acquisition has not been investigated in adult ALL patients to date. Patients and methods: Of the 238 adult ALL patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2016, 120 patients with abnormal karyotype at diagnosis, who underwent intensive chemotherapy, were included in this study. CCH was defined as presence of two or more cytogenetically abnormal clones. A defined ancestral clonal evolution included either mother-daughter and/or branched patterns. In the mother-daughter pattern, a daughter clone showed all cytogenetic abnormalities of a mother clone plus additional abnormality(s), which define a distinct subclone. In a branch pattern, all subclones possessed common cytogenetic abnormalities suggesting presence of a common ancestry, but each subclone acquires unique additional abnormality(s), which define them as distinctive subclones. Both patterns of cytogenetic clonal evolution were sometimes seen in a patient. Composite karyotypes were applied to patients where a common ancestry could not be clearly determined because of too complicated cytogenetic findings. Fisher's exact test was used to compare binary variables. The logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis of predisposing factors. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Results:Of the 120 patients included in this study, 64 patients were male, and 56 were female. The median age was 50 years (range, 16-79 years). Karyotypes at diagnosis were Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) in 56 patients, complex in 15, and t(8;14) in seven. According to the definition described above, 47 patients (39%) showed CCH at diagnosis, and two (4%) among them were categorized as composite karyotype. Of the 45 patients harboring a defined ancestral clonal evolution, numbers of subclones were two, three, and four in 32 patients (68%), 11 (24%), and 2 (4%), respectively. Mother-daughter pattern, branched pattern, and both were seen in 34 patients (76%), 5 (11%), and 6 (13%). In univariate analysis for predisposing factors of CCH acquisition, only younger age was significantly associated with CCH acquisition (48% in age <= 50 vs. 29% in age > 50; p = 0.04), but not karyotype. This statistical significance was confirmed with multivariate analysis (odds ratio = 0.44; p = 0.03). When investigating the prognostic impact of CCH acquisition, patients were divided into Ph-negative or Ph-positive ALL groups. In the 64 Ph-negative ALL patients, the CR rates were not significantly different between patients with or without CCH (78% vs. 78%, respectively; p = 1.00). The OS rates were similar between two groups (26% vs. 39% at five years, respectively; p = 0.56). Multivariate analysis for OS revealed that complex karyotype and t(8;14) were independent prognostic factors, but not CCH acquisition. Likewise, in the 56 Ph-positive ALL patients, CCH acquisition was not significantly associated with the CR rates (92% vs. 78%, respectively; p = 0.27), and the OS rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (34% vs. 40% at five years, respectively; p = 0.90). In multivariate analysis for OS, no independent prognostic factor was identified. Conclusion: Adult ALL patients with abnormal karyotype acquired CCH at diagnosis with a frequency comparable to that of AML patients. However, unlike AML patients, CCH acquisition was more frequently observed in younger population and did not show any prognostic impact in ALL patients. These findings suggested that biological backgrounds of CCH acquisition at diagnosis were possibly different between in patients with ALL and AML. So, to confirm these important findings, clinical studies with larger study subjects are warranted. Disclosures Handa: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Adult Patients with Philadelphia-Chromosome (Ph)-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Who Underwent Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant (allo-SCT)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2024-2024
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Shimizu ◽  
Takayuki Saitoh ◽  
Shinichiro Okamoto ◽  
Yoshinobu Kanda ◽  
Heiwa Kanamori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Pharmaceutical Research ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background: Cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis are recognized as a potent prognostic factor for acute leukemia patients. Among acute myeloid leukemia patients, the prognostic implications of cytogenetic abnormalities have been established for those treated with chemotherapy as well as those undergoing allo-SCT. In the context of Ph-negative ALLpatients, cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis clearly stratify the prognosis, whereas it has not been elucidated whether similar prognostic stratification is applicable to allo-SCT recipients. Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities in adult Ph-negative ALL patients who underwent allo-SCT. Patients and Methods: The study cohort included 373 adult Ph-negative ALL patients aged over 15 years who underwent allo-SCT for the first time between January 2001 and December 2012 at the 23 institutions participating in the Kanto Study Group for Cell Therapy (KSGCT). Patients' clinical data were collected from the KSGCT database. The Institutional Review Board of Gunma University approved the protocol of this study. Karyotypes considered high risk (HR) included t(4;11), t(8;14), low hypodiploidy, and complex (equal or more than five abnormalities), and all other karyotypes were designated standard risk (SR). On this basis, 308 patients (82.6%) were categorized as SR and 65 patients (17.4%) were categorized as HR at diagnosis. Of the 373 patients, 267 underwent allo-SCT in complete remission (CR) (224 in the SR group and 43 in HR group), and 106 in non-CR (84 in the SR group and 22 in HR group). For analysis, the study population was stratified based on disease status at the time of transplant. Almost all patients were conditioned with total body irradiation (TBI)-containing myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens prior to transplantation. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the date of transplantation to the date of death. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was defined as any death in continuous complete remission (CR). The Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of binary variables. OS and RFS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared using the log-rank test. Cumulative incidences (CI) of relapse and NRM were compared using the stratified Gray test. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: [Patients in CR] No significant difference in patient characteristics and transplant procedures was observed between the SR and HR groups. The 5-year OS rates were similar between the SR and HR groups (60.5% vs. 74.1%, respectively; p = 0.225) (Figure 1). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the 5-year CI of relapse and NRM rates between the two groups (relapse: 26.3% vs. 24.8%, respectively; p = 0.498, NRM: 19.6% vs. 10.0%, respectively; p = 0.232). Multivariate analysis for OS identified MAC and TBI-containing regimens, not cytogenetic risk, as significant positive prognostic factors. [Patients in non-CR] No significant difference was observed between the SR and HR groups in terms of patient characteristics or transplant procedures, although there was a female predominance in the HR group. Patients in the SR group had a significantly superior 5-year OS rate compared to the HR group (15.4% vs. 4.5%, respectively; p = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the 5-year CI of relapse between the SR and HR groups (60.3% vs. 50.0%, respectively; p = 0.411), whereas the 5-year CI of NRM in the SR group was significantly lower than that in the HR group (24.8% vs. 45.5%, respectively; p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis revealed cytogenetic risk group as an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion: These findings suggest that adult Ph-negative ALL patients in remission with HR cytogenetic abnormalities have similar transplant outcomes to those in the SR group. Considering the reported equality of the CR rates between the two groups, allo-SCT at an early clinical phase is recommended for HR group patients, reminiscent of Ph-positive ALL patients in the pre-imatinib era. Current transplant procedures do not improve outcomes for patients who are not in remission, especially those with HR cytogenetic abnormalities. Disclosures Usuki: MSD: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; SymBio Pharmaceutical: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Shionogi: Other: personal fees; Fujimoto Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other; Takeda Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Nippon Shinyaku: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Otsuka Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Other: personal fees; Fuji Film RI Pharma: Other: personal fees; Taiho Pharmaceutical: Other: personal fees, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding. Nakaseko:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Otsuka: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Additional Cytogenetic Abnormalities (ACA) Acquired at the First Relapse in Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3673-3673
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Shimizu ◽  
Akihiko Yokohama ◽  
Nahoko Hatsumi ◽  
Satoru Takada ◽  
Takayuki Saitoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Predisposing Factors ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Cytogenetic Changes ◽  
First Relapse

Abstract Background: Cytogenetic changes between the time of diagnosis and the first relapse are found in 30 to 60% of relapsed AML cases. ACA, the most frequent form of cytogenetic changes, are considered as a result of genetic instability and clonal evolution of AML cells. However, because the clinical significance of ACA has not been elucidated in adult AML patients, we conducted a large-scale retrospective study to address this unsolved issue. Patients and methods: Of the 375 adult patients diagnosed with AML between 1990 and 2010, 144 relapsed patients whose cytogenetic abnormality data both at diagnosis and at the first relapse were available were included in this study. All these patients underwent intensive chemotherapy. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Cytogenetic changes between the time of diagnosis and the first relapse were classified into four groups: (1) no change, (2) ACA was acquired at time of the first relapse, (3) cytogenetic abnormalities observed at diagnosis were reduced or had disappeared at the time of the first relapse, and (4) cytogenetic abnormalities observed at diagnosis were reduced or had disappeared, and completely different ACA was acquired at the time of the first relapse. In this study, groups 2 and 4 were defined as those with ACA acquisition. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the interval from the date of the first relapse to the date of death. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare binary variables. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multiple logistic regression analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were used for multivariate analysis of predisposing factors and prognostic factors, respectively. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Results: Of the 144 patients included in this study, 81 patients were male, and 63 were female. The median age was 53 years (range, 15–79 years). According to the definition described above regarding cytogenetic changes between the time of diagnosis and the first relapse, 83 (58%), 55 (38%), 2 (1%), and 4 (3%) patients were categorized into group 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively; thus, 59 patients (41%) acquired ACA at the first relapse. With univariate analysis, t(8;21), complex karyotype, fewer than 12 months duration of the first remission, and relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) were extracted as statistically significant predisposing factors for ACA acquisition at the first relapse. Of these four factors, the first three were confirmed with multivariate analysis to be independent predisposing factors. Excluding four patients that directly proceeded to allo-SCT without re-induction chemotherapy, the 140 patients with ACA acquisition showed a significantly lower second remission rate compared with those without ACA acquisition (20.0% vs. 72.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Furthermore, among all 144 patients, the 3-year OS rate after the first relapse in patients with ACA acquisition was significantly poorer than that in those without ACA acquisition (8.5% vs. 36.8%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that ACA acquisition was the strongest negative prognostic factor compared to all other reported factors (hazard ratio: 2.13, p < 0.001). Of the 59 patients with ACA acquisition (median age: 51, range; 15–79 years), 27 underwent allo-SCT after the first relapse. Eight patients were in remission at the time of transplant, and one directly proceeded to allo-SCT without re-induction chemotherapy. The 3-year OS rates after the first relapse were significantly different between patients undergoing allo-SCT after the first relapse and those treated only with chemotherapy (17.8% vs. 0%; p = 0.007). With multivariate analysis, undergoing allo-SCT after the first relapse was identified as an independent prognostic factor, in addition to the cytogenetic risk group at diagnosis. Conclusion: These findings suggested that ACA acquisition at the time of the first relapse was associated with chemo-refractive disease and poor prognosis. As ACA acquisition showed the most potent prognostic impact, treatment approaches for relapsed AML patients should be determined with consideration of this phenomenon. Clarification of the biological background of ACA acquisition may contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies and improved treatment outcomes in adult AML patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Use of Novel Agents In Patients with Multiple Myeloma Initially Treated with Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Results In A Significant Prolongation of Post Relapse Survival.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4580-4580
Author(s):  
Christopher P. Venner ◽  
Heather Sutherland ◽  
John Shepherd ◽  
Yasser Abou Mourad ◽  
Michael J. Barnett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Novel Agents ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Significant Prolongation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Relapsed Disease

Abstract Abstract 4580 Background: The use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) in the treatment of Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains controversial. Although there is hope that alloHSCT may result in a cure, relapse continues to be a significant problem. The morbidity associated with late complications of allogeneic transplantation further compounds the issues faced when addressing relapsed disease. The use of Novel Agents (NA) in this patient population has been poorly characterized. Here we present our experience of NA use in patients initially treated with alloHSCT. Patients: 108 patients underwent an allografting procedure for their MM at our center between 1989 and 2009. 84 received a fully myeloablative procedure (15 received donor lymphocyte infusion). 24 received an autologous HSCT followed by a reduced intensity allogeneic procedure. 56 have relapsed with this population making up our primary cohort for analysis. 22 patients received NAs and very few patients received them prior to transplant (4/108). Endpoints examined were post relapse survival after the initial HSCT procedure (PRS), overall survival from time of initial treatment (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) measured in months (m). Results: Of the entire cohort of 108 patients median OS was 78.6m (95% CI; 24.5–132.6). Median PFS was 23.6m (95% CI; 15.4–31.8). Of the non-relapsed patients (n = 52) the median OS was 125.9m. In this cohort 67% of the deaths occurred within 1.5 years. Of the relapsed patients (n = 56) median PFS was 18.7m (95% CI; 14.6–22.8), median PRS was 31.5m (95% CI; 17.0–46.0), and median OS was 67.0m (95% CI; 31.6–102.5). The effect of NA was examined in the cohort of relapsed patients. No significant difference was noted in PFS between those exposed to NA and those who were not exposed (19.0m (95% CI; 10.1–22.8) vs 13.7m (95% CI; 5.8–21.6); p = 0.27). Exposure to NA showed improvements in PRS (42.3m (95% CI; 7.3–77.2) vs 10.4m (95% CI; 5.2–15.7); p = 0.01, Figure 1). A trend toward superior OS was noted (71.4m (95% CI; 37.9–105.5) vs 24.6m (95% CI; 3.0–46.1); p = 0.11) although this did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Ongoing management of relapsed patients with multiple myeloma in the post alloHSCT setting remains a significant challenge. This retrospective study demonstrates that the use of NA is both safe and effective in treating relapsed disease. The predominant impact of these drugs is seen in the relapsed setting. Exposure to NA correlates with a 22m improvement in PRS. A 46m improvement in OS is noted however, likely due to the small cohort, it failed to reach statistical significance. Disclosures: Sutherland: Celgene: Honoraria; Orthobiotech: Honoraria. Shepherd:Celgene: Honoraria; Orthobiotech: Honoraria. Nevill:Celgene: Honoraria. Toze:Hoffman La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria.

Lille Scoring System Rather Than DIPSS Is a Better Predictive of Overall Mortality After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (HCT) for Primary Myelofibrosis Using Reduced Intensity Conditioning: A Report From the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR)

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 432-432
Author(s):  
Vikas Gupta ◽  
Kwang W Ahn ◽  
Xiaochun Zhu ◽  
Zhenhuan Hu ◽  
Parameswaran Hari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Donor Type ◽  
Conditioning Regimens ◽  
Reduced Intensity ◽  
Overall Mortality

Abstract Abstract 432 The Dynamic International prognostic scoring system (DIPSS) is increasingly being used as a prognostic tool for determining the risk of mortality for primary myelofibrosis (PMF), and has largely replaced Lille scoring system. However, it is unclear whether this scale can predict mortality after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic HCT, a procedure that is increasingly being utilized, as demonstrated by data from the CIBMTR. Using the CIBMTR database, the impact of patient, disease and transplant related factors on outcomes of 222 patients, who underwent HCT for PMF using RIC was analyzed. Median follow-up of survivors was 50 months (range, 3–165). Median age at HCT was 55 years, and 56 (25%) were >60 years. Donors were matched related donor (MRD), well-matched unrelated (MUD), and partially/mismatched unrelated (MMUD) in 85 (38%), 94 (42%), and 43 (19%), respectively. Conditioning regimens were: Fludarabine (Flu) and Melphalan (Mel), 62 (28%); Flu and Busulphan (Bu), 81 (36%), Flu and total body irradiation (TBI), 49 (22%); and others 30 (14%). Disease-risk status at HCT according to Lille scoring system was: low 48 (22%), intermediate (Int) 105 (47%), and high 69 (31%); and according to DIPSS was: low 25 (11%), int-1 110 (50%), int-2 81 (36%), and high, 4 (2%). The cumulative incidences of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) at 100 days and chronic GvHD at 5-years were 48% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 41–54) and 50% (95% CI 43–57), respectively. The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 5-years was 28% (95% CI 22–34) and 38% (95% CI 31–44), respectively. The corresponding disease-free and overall survival was 34% (95% CI 28–40), and 37% (95% CI 31–44), respectively. In multivariate analysis, high-risk disease defined by Lille scoring system was associated with two-fold higher mortality compared to low-risk disease (Table). Higher risk disease status as defined by DIPSS was not associated with a significant increase in mortality when compared to lower-risk disease (Table). MUD and MMUD use were associated with higher mortality risk compared to MRD with relative risk (RR) of 1.59 (95% CI 1.00–2.52) and 2.6 (95% CI 1.56–4.35), respectively. A comparison of conditioning regimens demonstrated a trend towards reduced mortality with FluMel when compared to FluBu (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33–0.92; overall p=0.11), or other regimens (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26–0.99; overall p=0.11). In conclusion, the current study highlights that the DIPSS was limited in predicting the mortality after RIC transplantation for PMF, while the Lille scoring system remained predictive of mortality in high risk patients. These findings underscore the need for transplant-specific scoring system. Compared to other conditioning regimens FluMel appears to be associated with a trend towards better survival, which needs to be confirmed in prospective randomized trials. Table. Multivariate Analysis (MVA) for overall mortality* Model 1. MVA of Lille scoring system Variable Relative Risk (RR) 95% CI Overall p-value Lille-risk score low-risk (n = 48) 1 0.02 Intermediate-risk (n = 105) 1.47 0.84-2.58 High risk (n = 69) 2.22 1.23-4.00 Conditioning regimen Flu TBI 1 0.11 Flu Mel 0.67 0.38-1.19 Flu Bu 1.20 0.73-1.97 Others 1.30 0.68-2.48 Donor type HLA-identical sibling/other related 1 0.001 Well-matched URD 1.60 1.01-2.53 Partially matched/mismatched URD 2.61 1.57-4.36 Contrast Flu Mel vs. Flu Bu 0.56 0.33-0.93 0.03 Flu Mel vs. Others 0.51 0.27-0.99 0.05 Flu Bu vs. Others 0.92 0.52-1.66 0.79 Intermediate vs. High 0.66 0.43-1.01 0.06 Well-matched URD vs. Partially matched/mismatched URD 0.61 0.38-0.98 0.04 Model 2. MVA of DIPSS DIPSS Low/Int-1 (n = 135) 1 0.10 Int-2/high (n = 85) 1.39 0.94-2.043 * Adjusted for age, sex, Karnofsky performance score, platelet count, spleen status, conditioning regimen, donor type, GVHD prophylaxis and year of transplant. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Analysis of Transfusion Dependency Development and Disease Evolution in Patients with MDS with 5q- and without Transfusion Needs at Diagnosis

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3180-3180
Author(s):  
Felix Lopez-Cadenas ◽  
Blanca Xicoy ◽  
Silvia Rojas P ◽  
Kaivers Jennifer ◽  
Ulrich Germing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Introduction: Myelodysplastic syndrome with del5q (MDSdel5q) is the only cytogenetically defined MDS category recognized by WHO in 2001, 2008 and 2016 and is defined as a MDS with deletion on the long arm of chromosome 5 and less than 5% of blast cells in bone marrow. It is known that for patients with MDSdel5q and transfusion dependence (TD), Len (LEN) is the first choice of treatment. However, data regarding factors that may impact on the development of TD or disease evolution in patients diagnosed without TD are scanty. In our study a retrospective multicenter analysis on patients with low-int 1 MDSdel5q without TD at diagnosis has been performed in order to answer these questions. Patients and methods: We performed a multicenter collaborative research from the Spanish (RESMD) and German MDS registries. Data from 153 low risk MDSdel5q without TD at diagnosis were retrospectively analyzed. Statistical analysis: Data were summarized using median, range, and percentage. The event of TD was defined as the development of TD according to the IWG criteria (2006) and/or the beginning of a treatment which could modify disease course (LEN or ESA). Transfusion or treatment free survival (TFS), overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS) were measured from diagnosis to TD or treatment, the first occurred (or to last follow up if none), last follow up or death from any cause and evolution to AML, respectively. TFS, OS and LFS were analyzed using the Kaplan Ð Meier method. The Log-rank test was used to compare variables and their impact on survival for univariate analysis.Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox's proportional hazards regression model. For comparison of Kaplan Meier curves the long rank test was used, with statistical significance with p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0. Results: Main clinical and biological characteristics were summarizing in table 1. From the total of 153 patients, finally 121 were evaluable. During the study 56 patients (46.2%) became in TD and 47 (38.8%) did not develop TD but received a modified disease course treatment. In this sense, most of the patients developed relevant anemia regarding those data (103 out of 121 patients, 85%). Median time to TD or treatment (TFS) was 20 months (1-132) from diagnosis. Secondary MDS (p=0.02), thrombocytosis (>350 109/L) (p=0.007), and neutropenia (<1.5 x 109/L) (p=0.02) were associated with poorer TFS. Thrombocytosis and neutropenia retained statistical significance in the multivariate analysis (Table 2). Among the TD patients (N=56), 42 (75%) received treatment: 28 LEN, 7 ESA and 7 other treatments. Among patients that did not develop TD (N=65), 47 (72.3%) received treatment before TD development: 16 LEN, 28 ESA and 3 other treatments. In order to know the evolution of these patients, survival analysis was performed. Median follow up was 58.9 months among alive patients and 57% of them were alive at the time of the last follow up. Estimated OS at 2 and 5 years was 94% and 64%. Regarding Univariate analysis, platelet <100 x 109/L (p=0.03), patients older than 71 years (p=0.001), and progression into AML (p=0.02) were associated with poorer OS. On the contrary, patients who had received treatment showed better OS (p<0.0001). This benefit is more evident among patients receiving LEN, median OS for patients receiving LEN, ESA/other treatments and not treated group was 137 months (CI 95%: 59,4 -215,5), 99,3 months (CI 95%: 46,6 -152) and 57,9 months (CI 95%: 38,2 -77,6), respectively, p<0.0001 (Figure 1). In the multivariate analysis, patients older than 71 years and LEN treatment retained the statistical significant impact on OS (Table 2). Twenty-eight patients (23%) progressed into AML, median time to AML was 35 months (5-122). When univariate analysis was performed, variables with adverse impact on LFS were platelets <100 x 109/L(p=0.019), neutropenia < 0.8 x 109/L (p=0.026), an additional cytogenetic abnormality (p=0.013) while treatment with LEN had a favorable impact (p=0.035). In the multivariate analysis only the presence of additional cytogenetic abnormalities retained statistical significance (Table 2). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the patients with low risk del(5q) MDS and no TD at diagnosis developed symptomatic anemia very early after diagnosis (20 months). Carefully monitoring should be stablished in order to detect this time point. Outcome of this subset of patients could improve after target therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Del Cañizo: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Research Funding; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Díez Campelo:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Impact of Peri-Transplant Molecular Mutations on Outcomes of AML Patients Undergoing Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioned Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4833-4833
Author(s):  
Mateo Mejia Saldarriaga ◽  
Yassine Tahri ◽  
Sangmin Lee ◽  
Zhengming Chen ◽  
Tsiporah B. Shore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Idh Mutations

Abstract Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is heterogenous disease with a range of cytogenetic and molecular changes. Several molecular mutations identified in AML patients at diagnosis have prognostic implications and play important roles in guiding induction and consolidative treatment decisions. The prognostic impact of mutations peri allogeneic stem cell transplant are less well characterized. In this study, we examine the significance of pre and by D100 Post-transplant mutation status in AML patients underwent Fludarabine/Melphalan conditioned reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT). Methods: AML patients who are in morphologic complete remission (CR1 or greater) with available molecular mutation at diagnosis, within 6 weeks prior to allogeneic SCT, and by 100 days post-transplant were included. Variables analyzed included baseline demographics, clinical variables (CIBMTR disease risk index (DRI), type of transplant, ELN risk, performance status) and 23 recurring molecular mutations. Analysis was also performed by grouping mutations into six pre-defined gene groups based on gene function (Table 2). Multivariable cox regression analysis was adjusted for age, gender, DRI and molecular mutation. Backward selection method was used to select the best combination of genes that is associated with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Results : A total of 142 AML patients with molecular genetic data available from 2014 to June, 2020 at Weill Cornell Medicine/New York Presbyterian Hospital were analyzed. Clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 58 years (range 20 -78). Total of 261 mutations were detectable at diagnosis (Table 3). Prior to allo SCT and by D100, the detectable mutations were 87 and 40 respectively, which represent 56 and 26 patients. High-dose chemotherapy was less effective on clearing DNMT3A, ASXL1, TET2 (DAT) or IDH mutations, resulting in over-representation of DAT and IDH mutations prior to transplant. With a median follow-up time of 25 months, the median overall survival for the group was 40.8 months. The presence of mutations in TP53 at diagnosis was associated with worse OS by both univariate (HR 3.67, p=0.0030, CI 1.56-8.68) and multivariate analysis (HR 4.75, p=0.0014, CI 1.82-12.39) with median OS reduced from 49.3 to 19.3 months (p=0.002). High CIBMTR DRI (HR 0.17, p=0.0018, CI 0.05-0.51) predicted reduced OS and RFS, and Age &gt;60 at diagnosis was associated with worse OS (HR 1.7 CI 1.04-3, p 0.03). Presence of any molecular mutation prior to transplant did not impact OS or RFS. For patients with any persistent mutations by D100 post-transplant, both OS ( HR 2.04, p 0.027, CI 1.08-3.8) and RFS (HR 1.99, p 0.025, CI 1.09-3.6,) were reduced in the univariate analysis, but not on multivariate analysis (HR 1.88, p 0.5, CI 0.99-3.49). Analysis based on six mutational groups (table 2) did not show any difference in their OS or RFS. However, worse RFS was independently associated with persistent IDH1 (HR 3.8, p 0.004, CI 1.07-56,), TET2 (HR 3.9, P 0.04, CI 1.04-14.1), and FLT3-ITD (HR 4.5, p 0.01, CI 1.7-52). Worse OS was independently associated with persistent TET2 (HR 3.9, p 0.013, CI 1.04-14.1), with a trend towards worse OS for IDH1, FLT3-ITD, with a trend towards worsening OS and RFS for ASXL1 (OS HR 7.4, p 0.06, CI 0.86 -63; RFS HR 4.9, p 0.06, CI 0.9-26) and DNMT3A (OS HR 2.3, p 0.12, CI 0.86-6.9; RFS 2.9, p 0.08, CI 0.98-8). Association with worse clinical outcomes remained significant after multivariate analysis for TET2 (both OS HR 3.98 p 0.041, CI1.07- 32 and RFS HR 5.8, p 0.032, CI 1.1- 29), IDH1 (RFS HR 8.02, p 0.049, CI 1.02 - 65) and FLT3-ITD (RFS HR 11.4, p0.010, CI 2.2- 80). Conclusions: Presence of TP53 mutations was associated with worse OS. Presence of pre-transplant mutation did not impact RFS or OS. Persistent presence of mutations in TET2, IDH1 and FLT3-ITD after Fludarabine/melphalan conditioning regimen allogeneic SCT were associated with shorter RFS and OS (in the case of TET2) independent of CIBMTR DRI. This analysis supports association of adverse outcomes in AML patients with selected persistent mutations by D100 post-transplant in reduced intensity transplant setting. Post-transplant strategies that can further eliminate persistent mutations should be investigated in prospective studies. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Lee: Pin Therapeutics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Desai: Kura Oncology: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen R&D: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding. Ritchie: Protaganist: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Other: travel support, Speakers Bureau; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Ended employment in the past 24 months, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roboz: MEI Pharma - IDMC Chair: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Helsinn: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Glaxo SmithKline: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Consultancy; Jasper Therapeutics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document