Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Lung Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Abstract Background: Thromboembolism (TE) in cancer significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality. Cancer immunotherapy is linked to several inflammatory immune mediated adverse events. Inflammation plays a key role in thrombosis but the association between immunotherapy and venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been thoroughly investigated. Here, we report the incidence of thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: A single institution retrospective cohort of 514 adult patients with lung cancer who received ICIs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, ipilumab, avelumab) between 2013 and 2017 was included. Diagnosis of VTE (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, and visceral vein thrombosis "VVT") was confirmed by imaging. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared using log rank test. Cumulative incidence rate of VTE was estimated and compared using Gray's method. Results: Of 514 patients (pts), 58.75% were males, 83.27% were white with a median age of 67 (range 22-91). Nivolumab was most commonly used (52.14%), followed by Pembrolizumab (30.16%), Atezolizumab (10.89%), combination of ipilimumab plus nivolumab (6.61), ipilimumab (2.33%), Avelumab (1.17%). 88.52% had stage 4 disease at treatment initiation. VTE events occurred in 62 pts (12%) (3.5% DVT, 4.47% PE, 2.72% both, 0.97 VVT, 0.19 VVT + PE, 0.19% VVT+DVT+PE). The cumulative incidence rate of VTE of all pts at 6-month and 1-year post IO was 7.6% (95% CI:5.3-9.9%) and 11.6% (95% CI:8.7-14.6%) respectively. The rate of survival without VTE at 6 months after IO treatment was 91% (95% CI: 89-94%). None of the following factors (age, gender, race, cancer staging, IO type or line) were significantly associated with time-to-VTE (TTVTE) survival post treatment (P >0.05). Median OS of all pts was 12.6 months (95% CI: 11.0-16.7 months), with 2-year OS rate of 35% (95% CI: 31-41%). Conclusion: ICIs in lung cancer are associated with higher VTE risk within six months and a year of initiation of treatment. Further studies are needed to investigate the risk factors for ICIs-associated VTE. Disclosures Pennell: Astrazeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; G1 therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Mirati Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Viosera Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Eli Lilly: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria. McCrae: Sanofi, Novartis, Alexion, and Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria; Dova, Novartis, Rigel, and Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy. Khorana: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Anthos: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Abstract 15395: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Cancer Are Associated With Increased Venous Thromboembolism Events

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.15395 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Jingyi Gong ◽

Zsofia Drobni ◽

Raza Alvi ◽

Sean Murphy ◽

Sarah Hartmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Immune Activation ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Massachusetts General Hospital ◽

Control Period ◽

Fold Increase ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Increased Risk

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) lead to immune activation, increased inflammation and cancer cell death. Both immune activation and inflammation are critical pathobiological drivers for venous thromboembolism (VTE). There are no robust data testing the effect of ICIs on the risk of developing VTE. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 2854 patients who received ICIs at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. VTE events, defined as a composite of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), were identified by individual chart review and were blindly adjudicated using standard criteria. A case-crossover design was applied with an “at-risk period” defined as the two-year period after and the “control period” as the two years prior to treatment. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated using Poisson’s regression. Results: Immune checkpoint inhibitor use increased VTE risk by 1.84-fold from 4.85 per 100-person years to 8.91 per 100 person-years (IRR 1.84, 95% confidence interval: 1.54 - 2.19, p <0.001). Of the individual components, there was a 2.44-fold increase in DVT risk (2.30 to 5.58 per 100 person-years) and 1.68-fold increase in PE risk (2.96 to 5.00 per 100 person-years). Comparing patients with and without a VTE event, those with a VTE event after ICI initiation had a higher rate of prior VTE, lung cancer, urothelial cancer, and a higher platelet count and white blood cell count at baseline. At 6 months post ICI initiation, 165 (8.6%) patients had a VTE event and of these patients 136 (7.1%) had no prior VTE. Conclusions: Patients with cancer treated with ICIs are at increased risk of developing VTE. Whether prophylaxis for VTE among patients starting an ICI reduces this risk is unclear.

Download Full-text

Venous thromboembolism incidence and risk assessment in lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis ◽

10.1111/jth.15272 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 19 (5) ◽

pp. 1250-1258

Author(s):

Oded Icht ◽

Naama Darzi ◽

Shai Shimony ◽

Oded Jacobi ◽

Daniel Reinhorn ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Risk Assessment ◽

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Lung Cancer Patients

Download Full-text

THER-16. EFFICACY OF UPFRONT IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS IN LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASIS

Neuro-Oncology Advances ◽

10.1093/noajnl/vdz014.059 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 1 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. i14-i14

Author(s):

Addison Barnett ◽

Adam Lauko ◽

Assad Ali ◽

Hong Li ◽

Soumya Sagar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Brain Metastasis ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Primary Lung Cancer ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽

Rank Test

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have resulted in improved outcomes in a subset of patients with lung cancer. However, data describing the efficacy of ICI in lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM) is limited. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in patients with LCBM treated with upfront ICI, defined as having received ICI within 90 days of LCBM diagnosis, compared to non-ICI therapies. METHODS: We reviewed 665 patients with LCBM who were diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 at a major tertiary care institution. Of those patients, 240 received ICI, 164 of which received ICI after 90 days and 76 received ICI within 90 days. Propensity score (PS) was calculated using a logistic regression model including age, KPS, number of baseline brain lesions, and presence of extra-cranial metastasis (ECM) at the time of BM diagnosis. OS from BM diagnosis between PS matched cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier, the Log-Rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Prior to PS matching, median survival between ICI and non-ICI cohorts was not significantly different (10.9 months for both, p=0.81), although more ICI patients had ECM (57.1% vs 40.9%, p=0.006). Following PS matching, the ICI (n=76) and non-ICI (n=76) cohorts had a median age (62.4 vs 62.3 years), KPS (80 for both), lesion number (2 for both), and ECM (56.6% for both). Of matched patients, 94% received SRS, 52% received WBRT, and 29% underwent surgical resection. Compared to non-ICI, the ICI cohort has a 2-year OS hazard ratio, HR=0.87 (95% CI=0.58–1.31, p=0.51). Median and 1-year survival were not significantly different between ICI and non-ICI cohorts (median: 10.9 vs 9.1 months; 1-yr: 43.0% vs 42.4%). CONCLUSION: Patients with BM from primary lung cancer who received ICI within 90 days of their BM diagnosis did not have improvement in OS compared to patients who received non-ICI therapies.

Download Full-text

CMET-12. EFFICACY OF UPFRONT IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS IN LUNG CANCER BRAIN METASTASIS

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noz175.213 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽

pp. vi53-vi53

Author(s):

Addison Barnett ◽

Adam Lauko ◽

Hong Li ◽

Assad Ali ◽

Soumya Sagar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Brain Metastasis ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Rank Test ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models

Abstract INTRO/OBJECTIVE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have improved outcomes in a subset of patients with lung cancer. However, data describing the efficacy of ICI in lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM) is limited. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in patients with LCBM treated with upfront ICI, defined as having received ICI within 90-days of LCBM diagnosis, compared to non-ICI therapies. METHODS We reviewed 665 patients with LCBM diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 at a major tertiary care institution. Of those patients, 240 received ICI, 164 of which received ICI after 90-days and 76 received ICI within 90-days. Propensity score (PS) was calculated by logistic regression model including age, KPS, number of baseline brain lesions, and presence of extra-cranial metastasis (ECM) at time of LCBM diagnosis. OS from LCBM diagnosis between PS matched cohorts were compared using Kaplan-Meier, the Log-Rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Prior to PS matching, median survival between ICI and non-ICI cohorts was not significantly different (10.9 months for both, p=0.81), although more ICI patients had ECM (57.1% vs 40.9%, p=0.006). Following PS matching, the ICI (n=76) and non-ICI (n=76) cohorts had median age (62.4 vs 62.3 years), KPS (80 for both), lesion number (2 for both), and ECM (56.6% for both). Of matched patients, 94% received SRS, 52% received WBRT, and 29% underwent surgical resection. Compared to non-ICI, the ICI cohort had a 2-year OS hazard ratio=0.87 (95% CI=0.58–1.31, p=0.51). Median and 1-year survival were not significantly different between ICI and non-ICI cohorts (median: 10.9 vs 9.1 months; 1-yr: 43.0% vs 42.4%). CONCLUSION Patients with LCBM who received ICI within 90-days of their diagnosis did not have improvement in OS compared to patients who received non-ICI therapies. Evaluation of clinical factors that may affect the efficacy and durability of immunotherapy is ongoing and will be presented.

Download Full-text

Alterations in STK11 to limit response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e21503 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21503-e21503

Author(s):

Jeremy Fricke ◽

Isa Mambetsariev ◽

Rebecca Pharaon ◽

Angel Ray Baroz ◽

Dan Zhao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Rank Test ◽

Alk Rearrangement ◽

Lung Cancer Patients ◽

Significant Difference

e21503 Background: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) drastically transformed the treatment of lung cancer. However, a variety of response rates have been observed in patients due to intrinsic or acquired resistances. STK11 mutated patients represent a subgroup of lung cancer patients with diminished outcomes when given ICIs, with some of these patients developing hyperprogressive disease (HPD). Methods: In this study, a retrospective cohort of 384 lung cancer patients previously treated with ICIs was identified from the City of Hope Thoracic Registry (THOR) with a cutoff date of November 11, 2018. Next-generational sequencing (NGS) was performed on 246 patients. 24 of these patients were harboring an alteration in STK11. Data was collected on these patients until December 31, 2019. HPD was exclusively defined by time-to-treatment failure (TTF) < 2 months (TTF is defined as the time from the start of treatment with ICI to ICI discontinuation for any reason, including progression, patient preference, toxicity, or death). Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) was started from the initiation of ICI therapy. OS and PFS was calculated between 2 groups (HPD vs non-HPD) using the Mantel-Cox Log-rank test. Results: Almost half (11/13; 45.8%) of the patients with STK11 developed HPD. There was a significant difference between HPD and non-HPD patients in median OS (2 vs 23 months; p = 0.0013) and median PFS (1 v 9 months; p < 0.0001). The median age was 66 (range, 41-90) years old with the majority of patients female (14/24; 58.3%). Most of the patients are deceased (16/24; 66.7%). 91.7% of STK11 patients histologically were adenocarcinoma and 91.7% were smokers with a median pack year history of 40 (range, 4-90). All of the patients had metastatic disease presenting with stage IV disease (21/24; 87.5%). ICI therapies used were pembrolizumab (11/24; 45.8%), Atezolizumab (8/24; 33.3%), nivolumab (4/24; 16.7%), and durvalumab (1/24; 4.2%). PD-L1 expression varied: negative (8/24; 33.3%), 1%- < 50% (7/24; 29.2%), ≥50% (4/24; 16.7%), and not reported (5/24; 20.8%). The most commonly occurring co-mutations were found in TP53 (14/24; 58.3%), KRAS (12/24; 50.0%), SMARCA4 (9/24; 37.5%), PRKDC (8/24; 33.3%) and LRP1B (8/24; 33.3%). Three patients had a pathological co-mutation that is targetable (1 ALK rearrangement, 1 EGFR exon 19 deletion, and 1 RET fusion). Conclusions: STK11 patients who developed HPD had worse OS and PFS compared to STK11 patients without HPD. These results are preliminary and additional analysis is needed to compare differences between various cohorts.

Download Full-text