scholarly journals Avelumab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: an open-label phase 2 study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (24) ◽  
pp. 2754-2763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok Jin Kim ◽  
Jing Quan Lim ◽  
Yurike Laurensia ◽  
Junhun Cho ◽  
Sang Eun Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label

Abstract This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with avelumab, an anti–programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). In this phase 2 trial, 21 patients with relapsed or refractory ENKTL were treated with 10 mg/kg of avelumab on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The primary end point was the complete response (CR) rate based on the best response. Targeted sequencing and immunohistochemistry were performed using pretreatment tumor tissue, and blood samples were drawn before and after treatment for measurement of cytokines and soluble programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), PD-L1, and PD-L2. The CR rate was 24% (5 of 21), and the overall response rate was 38% (8 of 21). Although nonresponders showed early progression, 5 responders currently continue to receive treatment and have maintained their response. Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2; no grade 4 adverse events were observed. Treatment responses did not correlate with mutation profiles, tumor mutation burden, serum levels of cytokines, or soluble PD1/PD-L1 and PD-L2. However, the response to avelumab was significantly associated with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor tissue (P = .001). Therefore, all patients achieving CR showed high PD-L1 expression, and their tumor subtyping based on PD-L1 expression correlated with treatment response. In summary, avelumab showed single-agent activity in a subset of patients with relapsed or refractory ENKTL. The assessment of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells might be helpful for identifying responders to avelumab. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03439501.

scholarly journals Related Adverse Events after Immunotherapy in Patient with NK/T-Cell Lymphoma: a Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linlin Zhang ◽  
◽  
Xiaodong Wu ◽  
Miaomiao Xu ◽  
Wenbin Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Pulmonary Inflammation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Laryngeal Edema ◽  
Nk T Cell

A 29-year-old male with pathologically confirmed extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma of the tonsil, nasal type was admitted to Xinhua hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The patient was provided with several cycles of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and obtained a Complete Response (CR) outcome. Despite the response, the patient also suffered from severe adverse effects, including a worsening pulmonary inflammation and severe laryngeal edema. A tracheotomy was performed to remove the white pseudo-membrane of laryngeal. via pathological analysis, necrosis of granuloma lymphoid cells and rhabdomous granuloma was found in this removed section. Meantime, a large amount of Candida nivaria, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter was present in the patient’s sputum culture. The level of inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-a, IL-1, IL-6, IL-17 and IFN-γ,) also increased significantly, indicating immune-related adverse events. Subsequently, the doctors adjusted immunotherapy to single-agent chemotherapy with additional anti-fungal and anti-bacterial infection treatment. The infection was well under control after these adjustments. 18F-FDG PET/ CT recorded the series of changes in the course of the patient from the start of immunotherapy.

Results From a Pivotal, Open-Label, Phase II Study of Romidepsin in Relapsed or Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma After Prior Systemic Therapy

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 631-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
H. Miles Prince ◽  
Francine Foss ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy

Purpose Romidepsin is a structurally unique, potent class 1 selective histone deacetylase inhibitor. The primary objective of this international, pivotal, single-arm, phase II trial was to confirm the efficacy of romidepsin in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Patients and Methods Patients who were refractory to at least one prior systemic therapy or for whom at least one prior systemic therapy failed received romidepsin at 14 mg/m2 as a 4-hour intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The primary end point was the rate of complete response/unconfirmed complete response (CR/CRu) as assessed by an independent review committee. Results Of the 131 patients enrolled, 130 had histologically confirmed PTCL by central review. The median number of prior systemic therapies was two (range, one to eight). The objective response rate was 25% (33 of 130), including 15% (19 of 130) with CR/CRu. Patient characteristics, prior stem-cell transplantation, number or type of prior therapies, or response to last prior therapy did not have an impact on response rate. The median duration of response was 17 months, with the longest response ongoing at 34+ months. Of the 19 patients who achieved CR/CRu, 17 (89%) had not experienced disease progression at a median follow-up of 13.4 months. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (24%), neutropenia (20%), and infections (all types, 19%). Conclusion Single-agent romidepsin induced complete and durable responses with manageable toxicity in patients with relapsed or refractory PTCL across all major PTCL subtypes, regardless of the number or type of prior therapies. Results led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of romidepsin in this indication.

Results From a Prospective, Open-Label, Phase II Trial of Bendamustine in Refractory or Relapsed T-Cell Lymphomas: The BENTLY Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gandhi Damaj ◽  
Rémy Gressin ◽  
Krimo Bouabdallah ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
Bachra Choufi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Previous Response ◽  
Angioimmunoblastic Lymphadenopathy ◽  
Prior Chemotherapy ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas

Purpose To determine the efficacy and safety of bendamustine as a single agent in refractory or relapsed T-cell lymphomas. Patients and Methods Patients with histologically confirmed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who progressed after one or more lines of prior chemotherapy received bendamustine at 120 mg/m2 per day on days 1 through 2 every 3 weeks for six cycles. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results Of the 60 patients included, 27 (45%) were refractory to their last prior chemotherapy, and the median duration of the best previous response was 6.6 months. Histology was predominantly angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy and PTCL not otherwise specified. The disease was disseminated in the majority of patients (87%). The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was one (range, one to three). Twenty patients (33%) received fewer than three cycles of bendamustine, mostly because of disease progression. In the intent-to-treat population, the ORR was 50%, including complete response in 17 patients (28%) and partial response in 13 patients (22%). Bendamustine showed consistent efficacy independent of major disease characteristics. The median values for DoR, PFS, and OS were 3.5, 3.6, and 6.2 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events were neutropenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (24%), and infections (20%). Conclusion Bendamustine showed an encouraging high response rate across the two major PTCL subtypes, independent of age and prior treatment, with acceptable toxicity in refractory or relapsed T-cell lymphoma.

Tazarotene 0.1% Cream as Monotherapy for Early-Stage Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Besner Morin ◽  
David Roberge ◽  
Irina Turchin ◽  
Tina Petrogiannis-Haliotis ◽  
Gizelle Popradi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cutaneous T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Topical Retinoids ◽  
Few Data ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Numerous treatments are available for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), including systemic retinoids. Very few data are available on topical retinoids. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of tazarotene as monotherapy for early-stage CTCL. Methods: An open-label, prospective study of tazarotene as monotherapy for stages IA to IIA CTCL was conducted. Index lesions on 10 patients were followed for 6 months on treatment, plus at least 6 months off treatment. Results: Six patients (60%) showed complete response (CR). Erythema, scaling, thickness, and lesion area decreased progressively throughout treatment. The mean time to CR was 3.8 months; CR was durable for at least 6 months in 83%. Of the 4 patients (40%) without CR, 2 (20%) had stable disease and 2 (20%) stopped the medication because of local side effects; none showed progression. Conclusions: This is the first Canadian trial providing evidence that topical tazarotene has excellent potential as a monotherapy agent for stages I to IIA CTCL.

Pralatrexate Is Active in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): Results of a Multicenter, Dose-Finding Trial.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 919-919
Author(s):  
Steven M. Horwitz ◽  
Madeleine Duvic ◽  
Youn Kim ◽  
Jasmine M Zain ◽  
Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 919 Background: Pralatrexate enters cancer cells via the reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC-1) and is efficiently polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS), leading to high intracellular retention. In a Phase 1/2 study of patients with hematologic malignancies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in aggressive T-cell lymphoma with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 30 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 of 7 weeks. The generally indolent course of CTCL may be better treated at lower doses in a maintenance fashion if a lower incidence and severity of adverse events can be achieved while preserving activity. PDX-010 is an open-label, single-agent, multicenter, Phase 1 dose-reduction trial in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. The primary objective is to identify an optimal dose and schedule of pralatrexate for these patients. Methods: Eligibility included mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); with disease progression after at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The pralatrexate dose and schedule started at 30 mg/m2 by IV push on 3 of 4 weeks and subsequent cohorts received reduced doses (20, 15, 10 mg/m2) and/or schedules (3/4 or 2/3 weeks) of pralatrexate based on tolerability. All patients received supplementation with vitamin B12 1 mg intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and folic acid 1 mg orally once daily. As we sought a well tolerated regimen the definition of DLTs to trigger dose reduction included toxicities such as grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 mucositis/stomatitis, and any toxicity leading to dose omission or reduction in cycle 1. If DLT occurred and a response was seen, the following cohort was opened at the next lower dose or next less frequent schedule. Response was evaluated by modified severity-weighted adjustment tool (SWAT) every 2 cycles for 6 months and then every 4 cycles. For patients with lymph node involvement, scans were completed at baseline and upon clinical response or end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Results: Thirty-one patients received pralatrexate, with 18 (58%) men and median age of 57 yrs (range, 30-81). Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 1-25). Cohorts at the following doses/schedules were enrolled: 30 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=2), 20 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=3), 20 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=7), 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=6), 15 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=3), and 10 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=10). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 72 days (range, 7-491+); 4 patients received >10 cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were mucositis (18 patients [58%]), nausea (14 patients [45%]), fatigue (14 patients [45%]), pyrexia (7 patients [23%]), vomiting (6 patients [19%]), anemia (6 patients [19%]), and edema (5 patients [16%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities in >1 patient each were mucositis (4 patients [13%]) and anemia (2 patients [6%]). Mucositis was dose limiting (≥ grade 2) in 8 patients (26%). A total of 11 responses were observed, including 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. In the 18 patients who received pralatrexate at a dose intensity of 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks or greater, the objective response rate was 56% (10/18 patients). This appeared to be the threshold dose for substantial activity in CTCL, below which the incidence of responses decreased in this dose de-escalation trial. Conclusion: Pralatrexate shows impressive activity in the treatment of relapsed CTCL. The optimal dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability for CTCL was determined to be pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly on 3 of 4 weeks. This cohort is being expanded to better assess efficacy and durability. Disclosures: Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Duvic:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.

Final Results From a Pivotal, Multicenter, International, Open-Label, Phase 2 Study of Romidepsin In Progressive or Relapsed Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Following Prior Systemic Therapy

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 114-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
H. Miles Prince ◽  
Francine M Foss ◽  
Lubomir Sokol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy

Abstract Abstract 114 Background: Romidepsin is a potent HDAC inhibitor approved by the FDA for patients (pts) with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma who have received at least 1 prior systemic therapy. Durable clinical benefit and tolerability of romidepsin in pts with recurrent or refractory PTCL have been previously observed in a phase 2 trial conducted by the National Cancer Institute. The aim of this phase 2, single-arm, open-label registration study was to evaluate the activity of romidepsin in a larger number of pts with progressive or relapsed PTCL. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed PTCL (PTCL NOS, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, ALCL [ALK-1 negative], other subtypes) who failed or were refractory to ≥ 1 prior systemic therapy, and had measurable disease and ECOG performance status 0–2 were eligible. Exclusions included inadequate bone marrow or other organ function and significant cardiovascular abnormalities. Pts received romidepsin 14 mg/m2 as a 4-h IV infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles; treatment could be extended for stable disease (SD) or response. The primary endpoint was rate of complete response (CR + CRu) as evaluated by a central Independent Review Committee (IRC) using International Working Criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. IRC assessment consisted of a 2-step process, with initial radiographic review of images (CT, MRI) followed by an overall clinical assessment based on the radiology evaluations, photographs, and relevant clinical parameters. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR): CR + CRu + partial response (PR), investigator-assessed responses, duration of response, time to response, and safety. Results: 131 pts from 48 US, European, and Australian sites were enrolled and received at least 1 dose of romidepsin (as-treated population); 130 patients had histologically confirmed PTCL by central review. Mean age of all pts was 59.4 y (range, 20–83) and median time since diagnosis was 1.25 y (range, 0–17). Median number of prior systemic therapies was 2 (range, 1–8). 21 pts (16%) had failed a prior stem cell transplant. Responses assessed by the IRC are noted in the table below. Longest duration of response is 26+ mo and 16 (94%) of the 17 pts with a CR had not progressed as of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010). Investigator-assessed responses included 21 pts (16%) with CR + CRu, 18 pts (14%) with PR for an ORR of 30%. Currently, 13 pts continue to receive treatment (range, 10–36 cycles). Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 126 of 131 pts (96%). AEs reported in ≥ 20% of pts were nausea (59%), fatigue (41%), vomiting (38%), thrombocytopenia (38%), diarrhea (35%), pyrexia (34%), neutropenia (30%), anorexia (28%), constipation (28%), anemia (23%), and dysgeusia (21%). AEs ≥ grade 3 were reported for 86 pts (66%), with the most common (≥ 5%) being pneumonia (5%), pyrexia (5%), sepsis (5%), and vomiting (5%). 60 pts (46%) had at least 1 serious AE: the most frequently reported (≥ 5%) were pyrexia (7%), pneumonia (5%), vomiting (5%), and sepsis (5%). 22 pts (17%) withdrew due to AEs. 8 pts (6%) died within 30 days of the last dose of romidepsin; 1 death, due to sepsis, was assessed as possibly related to treatment. Conclusions: Complete and durable responses were observed with single agent romidepsin in pts with relapsed PTCL. These data support the therapeutic potential for romidepsin in relapsed PTCL and suggest that romidepsin is a strong candidate for inclusion in future novel regimens for these diseases. As of the data cutoff (March 31, 2010), the median duration of follow-up for CR is 8.2 mo. Disclosures: Coiffier: Gloucester: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Romidepsin is indicated for the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. Romidepsin is not currently approved for the treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Pro:Celgene: Research Funding. Prince:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Foss:Celgene: Consultancy; Eisai: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Speakers Bureau; Allos: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Sokol:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Caballero:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Morschhauser:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria. Padmanabhan:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Shustov:Celgene: Research Funding. Nichols:Celgene: Employment. Carroll:Celgene: Employment. Balser:Gloucester Pharmaceutical: Consultancy. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria.

scholarly journals Brentuximab Vedotin As Single Agent in the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory CD30 Positive Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A Phase 2 Study of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Vittorio Stefoni ◽  
Paolo Corradini ◽  
Lorella Orsucci ◽  
Stefano Volpetti ◽  
Lisa Argnani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Not Otherwise Specified ◽  
Phase 2 Study

Options are limited for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) for whom the median overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) are less than 6 months. Patients who are candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be cured should they achieve adequate response to salvage therapy prior to transplant. Patients who relapse after transplant or who are not transplant candidates are often treated with sequential single-agent therapies with non-curative intent. Only four agents are FDA-approved for the treatment of R/R PTCL including pralatrexate, romidepsin and belinostat. The objective response rate to each of these agents is only 25-30% and duration of response (DOR) is limited. For a specific subtype of PTCL, namely systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, single-agent brentuximab vedotin (BV) treatment resulted in an 86% overall response rate (ORR) and a 57% complete response (CR) rate in R/R disease. A phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BV in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) and PTCL not otherwise specified reporting an ORR of 41% (Horwitz et al, Blood. 2014). We conducted a phase 2 study to determine the antitumor efficacy of single-agent BV (1.8 mg/kg administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of 16 cycles) as measured by the ORR in R/R CD30+ PTCL patients (PTCL not otherwise specified, AITL and transformed mycosis fungoides). Secondary objectives were to assess duration of tumor control, including duration of response and progression-free survival, overall survival and the safety and tolerability of BV in this setting. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02497131. From September 2015 and September 2019, 25 patients were enrolled and 23 (population for the final analysis) received at least one BV infusion (median 5, range 2-16). There were 10 females, 18 patients were in stage IV and 16 subjects were refractory to the last therapy. Median number of therapies received prior to BV was 2 (range 1-6). Final ORR was 30.4%, with 4 CR. CR patients were 3 PTCL not otherwise specified and 1 AITL with response duration of 2.8, 3.3, 4.5 and 10.7 months, respectively. Best response was achieved at the III cycle. PFS was 4.3% at 12 months (median reached at 4.4 months), OS at 12 months was 49.8% (median reached at 11.4 months) and median DOR was 3.4 months. No correlation between CD30 expression per central review and response was observed. Twenty-one hematological toxicities occurred, 14 of them were grade ≥3 (10 thrombocytopenia and 4 neutropenia, all resolved or improved during BV therapy). Among extra-hematological toxicities (n=26, 3.5% grade ≥3), 7 were serious adverse events. To note, 6 of them (23.1%) were lung infection/pneumonia. Only one peripheral neuropathy (grade 1) occurred. In terms of response, the ORR and PFS in this trial are comparable to those in similar populations studied with both other recently approved agents, such as pralatrexate and romidepsin, and with the other phase 2 study on BV. The ORR of 30% and the OS of in the present study places BV among the active agents for PTCL. Safety concerns emerged about infections, claiming for a strict monitoring for these toxicities. Disclosures Corradini: Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; KiowaKirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; BMS: Other; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel and accommodations paid by for. Zinzani:Immune Design: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Portola: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Eusapharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kirin Kyowa: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Immune Design: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Multicenter, phase II study of bendamustine in refractory or relapsed T-cell lymphoma: The BENTLY trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8026-8026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remy Gressin ◽  
Gandhi Laurent Damaj ◽  
Kamal Bouabdallah ◽  
Guillaume Cartron ◽  
B Choufi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Previous Response ◽  
T Cell Lymphomas

8026 Background: T-cell lymphomas have a poor prognosis with few options of effective treatment. This study determined the efficacy and safety of bendamustine as a single agent in the treatment of refractory or relapsed T-cell lymphomas. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) or cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), who had previously received at least one line of chemotherapy were selected. Bendamustine was administered IV at the dosage of 120 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 every 3 weeks, for 6 cycles. Treatment response was assessed using the IWC for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), NCT00959686. Results: Twenty two female and 38 male were included. The median age was 66 years with more 1/4 of them > 75. Histology was predominantly angio-immunoblastic lymphadenopathy (n=32) and PTCL-nos (n=23). The median previous line of chemotherapy was 1 (1-3). Nearly one half (45%) of the patients was refractory to the last previous chemotherapy and the median duration of the best previous response was 6.6 (1.5-67) months. The disease was disseminated in the majority of case (87%) and the international prognostic index (IPI) was high (3–5) in 68% of the patients. Twenty patients (33%) received less than 3 cycles of bendamustine. The major reason for early discontinuation was disease progression. In the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population, the best ORR was 50%, including complete response (CR) in 28% and partial response (PR) in 22 %. Bendamustine showed a consistency in the efficacy as a function of major disease characteristics. The median values for DoR, PFS and OS were 3.5, 4 and 6 months respectively. The most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (24%) and infections (20%). Conclusions: Bendamustine is active in high risk refractory and relapsed T-cell lymphoma with manageable toxicity.

Panobinostat in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: an open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. e326-e333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daryl Tan ◽  
Colin Phipps ◽  
William Y K Hwang ◽  
Soo Yong Tan ◽  
Chun Hsien Yeap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Multicentre Phase ◽  
Phase 2 Trial
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document