Bortezomib in Combination with Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Abstract Single agent bortezomib treatment at the dosage and schedule published by Richardson (2003) stabilizes disease in nearly 60% of patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, only 35% of patients achieve an objective (≥ minor) response (MR). Dexamethasone adds to clinical anti-myeloma activity of bortezomib by inducing 18% responses in patients with either stable or progressive disease on bortezomib alone. In an attempt to improve disease response, we evaluated a primary bortezomib/dexamethasone combination in patients with multiple myeloma in ≥ 2nd untreated or refractory relapse. Eligible patients were 18–80 years old, had an ECOG performance status of 0 – 2 and adequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary and cardiac function. Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 or neuropathic pain of any grade were exclusion criteria. However, we made no restrictions in terms of pretreatment blood counts. Fifteen consecutive patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (9/15 with ≥ 2nd untreated and 6/15 with refractory relapse; 71% with a chromosome 13 deletion) were scheduled to receive bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² IV days 1, 4, 8, 11 q 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg PO once daily on the day of bortezomib injection and the day thereafter. Treatment was withheld for nonhematologic adverse events (AE) ≥ grade 3 and reinitiated at a 25% lower dose after resolution. Treatment was not stopped for myelosuppression of any grade if interim response evaluations precluded myeloma progression as the cause of cytopenia. One patient (7%) achieved a complete response, 10 (67%) a partial response, and 1 (7%) a MR resulting in an overall response rate (≥ MR) of 80% (9/9 with ≥ 2nd untreated and 3/6 with refractory relapse; EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR criteria). Responses occurred after a median of 3 weeks and were independent of conventional prognostic parameters. Importantly, 8/10 patients with a chromosome 13 deletion achieved a ≥ PR. Adverse events, mainly myelosuppression (34% grade 3/4 neutropenia; 47% grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia), neuropathy (grade 2/3/4 20%/7%/0%) and fatigue (grade 2/3/4 20%/13%/20%), were manageable. There was no case of neutropenic infection or thrombocytopenic bleeding. Two patients suffered herpes zoster. The percentage of transfusion dependent patients decreased from 44% during the 1st treatment cycle to 23% and 11% after the 2nd and 3rd treatment cycles, respectively. Even non-responders did not experience cumulative hematologic toxicity. After a median follow-up of 5 months, median event free and overall survival were not reached. Five out of 15 patients were non-responders (n=1) or had experienced disease progression (n=4). Notably, 2 patients with sustained paraprotein and bone marrow remission (confirmed by biopsy) had extramedullary disease progression, pointing to a bone marrow restricted response to bortezomib in MM. This study indicates that bortezomib can be given safely even in patients with poor bone marrow reserve, who would not have been candidates for the SUMMIT trial. Though the remission rate was high, remissions often were not durable. This fact underlines the need for consolidating treatment and evaluation of bortezomib combinations with other anti-myeloma agents.

Download Full-text

Ongoing Phase 1a/1b Dose-Finding Study of CWP232291 (CWP291) in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.4501.4501 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 4501-4501 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Sung-Soo Yoon ◽

Chang-Ki Min ◽

Jin Seok Kim ◽

Elisabet E. Manasanch ◽

Robert Hauptschein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Target Genes ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Dose Range ◽

Single Agent ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Pharmaceutical Corporation ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: CWP291, a novel peptidomimetic small molecule, has potent and selective inhibitory activity on a Wnt gene reporter and decreases expression of the β-catenin target genes, cyclin D1 and survivin. It has broad anti-cancer efficacy in vitro, outperforming lenalidomide and bortezomib in multiple myeloma murine xenografts and demonstrating improved survival when used in combination with lenalidomide in bone marrow engraftment models. Methods: Subjects with relapsed or refractory MM were infused CWP291 iv over at least 30 minutes twice weekly for 3 weeks out of a 4-week cycle in a 3+3 dose-escalation, Phase 1 design. Results: Results as of July 15, 2016 over a dose range of 198 - 446 mg/m2 in 9 subjects are reported. Median duration of treatment was 3 cycles (range 1.3 - 6.5 cycles) with 3 subjects ongoing. The most common (>20% of subjects) drug-related adverse events (AEs) were due to GI toxicities, including diarrhea (77.8%), nausea (55.6%) and constipation (33.3%). Toxicity was mostly ≤grade 2, however grade 3/4 events were frequently related to myelosuppression, including neutropenia (33.3%), and anemia and thrombocytopenia (22.2% each). Serious adverse events were recorded for 5 subjects with 8 separate events: 6 events in 4 subjects considered unrelated were hospitalizations for pneumonia, and 2 events in 1 subject each considered possibly related were a urinary tract infection and grade 3 hypoxia. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2 patients at 446 mg/m2, which were hypoxia (grade 3) and thrombocytopenia (grade 4). Accrual at 335 mg/m2 has now been initiated. Stable disease (≥3 months on therapy with no increase in M protein as per the IMWG) was seen in 4 subjects. There was also documentation of a 34.6% decrease in bone marrow plasma cells in one subject for whom a bone marrow aspirate was available. PK in the first 3 subjectsreceiving198 mg/m2showed plasma levels of the active metabolite had very little inter-patient variability, which were comparable to patients with AML receiving this same dose in another study. There was less than 4% excreted in the urine, and there was no evidence of accumulation from Day 1 to Day 18. Changes in targeted genes in blood and BM, as well as additional PK, will be provided from expanded and escalated dosing cohorts. Furthermore, preliminary observations in the Phase 1b part of this study, which combines the administration of CWP291 with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, will be reported. Conclusions: CWP291, a novel and first in class molecule with significant preclinical activity, shows single agent safety as well as early evidence of efficacy in subjects with MM. Accrual is ongoing to establish the optimal dose level for both single agent and combination therapy. Disclosures Hauptschein: JW Theriac Pharmaceutical: Employment. Choi:JW Pharmaceutical Corporation: Employment. Lee:JW Pharmaceutical Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

SDX-105 Demonstrates a High Response Rate as a Single-Agent with Acceptable Safety in Rituximab-Refractory, Relpased Indolent or Transformed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.2480.2480 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 2480-2480 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Jonathan Friedberg ◽

Philip Cohen ◽

Robert O. Kerr ◽

K. Sue Robinson ◽

Andres Forero-Torres ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Overall Response Rate ◽

Response Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Mitotic Catastrophe ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Overall Response ◽

Cell Death Pathway ◽

Grade 3

Abstract SDX-105 (Treanda™, Bendamustine HCl) is an alkylating agent that may exert its anti-tumor activity via mitotic catastrophe, an apoptosis-independent cell-death pathway, as well as, through apoptosis. Its cytotoxic potency is unattenuated in chemotherapy-resistant lymphoma cell lines. We initiated a multi-center Phase II trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of SDX-105 in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent or transformed B cell NHL. Patients must have pathologically-confirmed disease that has been demonstrated to be rituximab-refractory (no response or progression within 6 months) or must be intolerant of rituximab. Other requirements include measurable disease, adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function (ANC ≥1K/mm3, platelet ≥ 100K/mm3, except in cases of >50% NHL in bone marrow), up to 3 prior chemotherapies, and no prior allogeneic transplant. Patients receive SDX-105, 120 mg/m2 IV over 30–60 min, days 1 and 2, every 21 days. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity during a cycle results in dose reduction for subsequent cycles (to 90 mg/m2 and then to 60 mg/m2). Patients achieving stable disease or better after 6 cycles may receive up to 6 more cycles. 49 patients have been accrued to date with data available on the first 15 patients. The median age is 69 yrs (range 47–84), 47% male, median 6 yrs since diagnosis with NHL. Histologies: 10 follicular (6 Grade 1, 3 Grade 2, 1 Grade 3), 2 SLL, 1 marginal zone and 2 transformed NHL. Other features include: 93% Stage III/IV, 20% with B symptoms, 87% with extranodal disease, median 2 prior chemotherapies with 40% not responding to last chemotherapy. 4 patients have required dose reduction to 90 mg/m2 and 2 patients have withdrawn prior to completing 6 cycles due to treatment-associated toxicity. The current overall response rate (ORR) based upon best response in the intent-to-treat population is 80% (CR/CRu 20%, PR 60%). Overall 73% of patients experienced a related non-hematologic adverse event (AE), of which 20% were Grade 3 and 0% Grade 4. The most frequent AEs were nausea (40%), vomiting (27%), fatigue (33%), anorexia (20%), and constipation (20%). Alopecia was not observed. Grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was seen in 53% (neutropenia), 20% (thrombocytopenia), and 13% (anemia) of patients. 4 patients experienced serious AEs, including 1 patient with baseline renal insufficiency who died on study from renal failure and pulmonary edema; other events include admissions for fever and anemia, urinary tract infection, and dehydration. Based upon these preliminary findings, SDX-105 demonstrates a high overall response rate with acceptable hematologic toxicity and modest non-hematologic toxicity in a relapsed lymphoma patient population, many of whom are refractory to rituximab-chemotherapy combinations. An additional study evaluating the combination of SDX-105 and rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent NHL who are rituximab-sensitive is also ongoing.

Download Full-text

Rituximab in CD20 Positive Multiple Myeloma: A Prospective Study from the IFM Group.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.3577.3577 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 3577-3577

Author(s):

Philippe Moreau ◽

Laurent Voillat ◽

Lotfi Benboubker ◽

Charles Dumontet ◽

Claire Mathiot ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Tumor Cells ◽

Stable Disease ◽

Plasma Cells ◽

Single Agent ◽

Stage I ◽

Minor Response ◽

Cd20 Expression ◽

Anti Cd20

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogenous disease. A strong association between small mature plasma cell morphology, t(11;14) and CD20 expression has been described in approximately 10% of the patients with MM (Robillard et al, Blood 2003). In this subgroup of patients with MM expressing CD20, rituximab (anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody) could target the antigen and could have a clinical impact. Thus we conducted a prospective phase II trial of 4 weekly IV infusions of 375 mg/m2 rituximab in patients with MM expressing CD20 on at least 33% of tumor cells. From 07/2004 to 02/2006, 14 consecutive patients, median age 65 years, with either stage I MM never pretreated (n = 7) or stage III MM in relapse or refractory after a median of 2 lines of therapy (n= 7) were treated. Immunophenotype using flow cytometry revealed that a median of 75% of tumor cells were expressing CD20 (range, 33–100%) at the onset of therapy. Responses were evaluated 3 months after therapy according to EBMT criteria. At the reference date of June 1st, 2006, a single patient, who had relapsed 8 months after a double autologous SCT, experienced a minor response, ongoing 18 months after rituximab therapy. At the time of rituximab therapy, 100% of its plasma cells were expressing CD20, and 3 months after treatment, bone marrow examination showed 0.6% of plasma cells, none of them expressing CD20. Five patients (1 with relapsed MM and 4 with stage I MM) experienced stable disease, ongoing for 3, 4, 4, 11 and 12 months, respectively. Three patients with stage I MM had stable disease but subsequently progressed 10, 11, and 15 months after therapy, respectively. The last 5 patients with relapsed MM did not respond to anti-CD20 therapy, despite partial clearance of CD20+ plasma cells in the bone marrow in 2 cases. Conversely in the 3 latter cases, the percentage of CD20+ plasma cells did not decrease despite rituximab therapy. Several factors have been described to explain resistance against rituximab in a variety of B-cell malignancies such as the level of CD20 expression, dissociated action of complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependant cellular cytotoxicity, polymorphism in FcgammaRIIIA receptor, and may be inadequate dose schedule. These mechanisms could explain the marginal activity of rituximab as single-agent in CD20+ MM.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of 90Y Ibritumomab Tiuxetan (Zevalin®) for Untreated FollicularNon-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (FL) Patients, An Italian Cooperative Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v118.21.100.100 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 118 (21) ◽

pp. 100-100

Author(s):

G. Pica ◽

S. Nati ◽

Umberto Vitolo ◽

Sara Galimberti ◽

Pier Luigi Zinzani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Conflicts Of Interest ◽

Remission Rate ◽

Bone Marrow Involvement ◽

Single Agent ◽

Multicenter Trial ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Ibritumomab Tiuxetan ◽

Highly Effective ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Treatment Safety

Abstract Abstract 100 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin®) combines the targeting advantage of monoclonal antibody with the radiosensitivity of FL. Previous studies showed that Zevalin resulted safe and highly effective in relapsed/refractory indolent NHL, irrespective to prior treatment with rituximab. Based on these results, we designed a multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of “upfront” single-agent Zevalin in FL. The primary endpoint was the incidence of responses in terms of overall remission rate (ORR) and complete remissions (CR). The secondary endpoints were the treatment safety by monitoring hematology and biochemistry parameters as well as adverse events. Fifty patients, with a median age of 59 years (range, 35–81), were treated. Forty-eight percent had bone marrow involvement (<25%) and 14% an elevated LDH. Thirty-four percent of patients had high risk FLIPI. Forty-six patients were also assessed by qualitative and quantitative PCR for Bcl2/IgH or IgH clonal rearrangement, for total 30 cases PCR-positive (65.2%). Results: The ORR was 93% (45/48) with a CR rate of 82% (41/48). Twenty-six patients, who were PCR-positive at diagnosis, were assessed at week 14. Twenty out of 26 (77%) became PCR-negative. After a median follow up of 24 months, the 2-year EFS for all patients was 85%; moreover, 15 patients (55%), who were PCR-positive at diagnosis, maintain PCR negativity. As expected, the main toxicity was moderate myelosuppression, with 30% and 26% of patients developing Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Very few patients required platelets transfusion (4%) or growth factor use (6%). None of the patients experienced grade 3/4 non hematologic toxicity. In conclusion, Zevalin is highly effective and safe treatment for newly diagnosed FL patients. In the next future, the role of radioimmunotherapy - i.e. including optimal sequencing with chemotherapy - should be established in randomized studies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Safety and Efficacy of Combined Ruxolitinib and Decitabine in Patients with Blast-Phase MPN and Post-MPN AML: Results of a Phase I Study (Myeloproliferative Disorders Research Consortium 109 trial)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v128.22.1124.1124 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 128 (22) ◽

pp. 1124-1124 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Raajit K. Rampal ◽

John O. Mascarenhas ◽

Heidi E. Kosiorek ◽

Dmitriy Berenzon ◽

Elizabeth Hexner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Phase I ◽

Peripheral Blood ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase I Trial ◽

Fixed Dose ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Blast Phase ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background: The Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) includePolycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF). These stem cell disorders carry a propensity to evolve into acute myeloid leukemia (MPN-blast phase [BP] or post-MPN AML) with a dismal prognosis not meaningfully improved by conventional anti-leukemia therapy. Thus, MPN-BP is an urgent unmet clinical need. Responses in patients with MPN-BP to hypomethylating agents and single agent ruxolitinib have been reported. More recently, combination of ruxolitnib and decitabine has demonstrated synergistic activity in vitro in cells derived from patients with MPN-BP and from a murine model of MPN-BP (Rampal et al PNAS 2014). These observations led us to explore the safety of combined decitabine and dose escalation of ruxolitinib in MPN-BP. Objective: To establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of ruxolitinib in combination with a fixed dose of decitabine (DEC-RUX). Methods: We conducted an open label Phase I trial in patients with MPN acceleration phase (AP) as defined by 10%-19% blasts in the peripheral blood or bone marrow or a diagnosis of MPN-BP as defined by ≥ 20% blasts in the blood or bone marrow, following a previous diagnosis of ET, PV or PMF. Patients were enrolled in a standard 3+3 phase I design with an MTD defined as a dose <33% DLT. Ruxolitinib was administered at doses of 10mg, 15mg, 25mg, or 50mg every 12 hours in combination with concurrent decitabine at a dose of 20mg/m2 daily intravenously over 5 days and repeated every 28 days. Adverse events were assessed using the NCI CTCAE v. 4.0. DLTs were defined as Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity events not clearly related to disease and grade 4 hematologic events with a bone marrow cellularity of ≤5% and no evidence of leukemia. Response assessment was carried out every cycle using modified Cheson criteria: CR required 0% peripheral blood blasts, WBC ≥4x109/L, hemoglobin ≥10g/L, and platelets ≥100x109/L; CRi required 0% peripheral blood blasts with incomplete count recovery; and PR required ≥50% decrease in peripheral blood blasts regardless of blood counts. Results: A total of 21 patients were accrued to study (Table 1). The median age was 63 years (range 48-88). 52% carried a diagnosis of MPN-AP, and 48% carried a diagnosis of MPN-BP. 29% of patients and 24% of patients had prior exposure to ruxolitinb and decitabine, respectively. The median number of cycles received varied from 10.5 cycles in the 10mg BID cohort to 2 and 2.5 cycles in the 25mg BID and 50mg BID cohorts, respectively (Table 2). The most common Grade 3/4 non-hematologic AEs observed were due to infection in all dosing cohorts. In terms of hematologic toxicity, treatment emergent Grade 3/4 anemia was observed in 1 patient in each of the 10mg BID, 15mg BID, and 50mg BID cohorts. Grade 3/4 leukopenia was observed in only 1 patient at the 50mg BID cohort, and Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 2 patients in the 10mg BID cohort and 1 patient in the 15mg BID cohort. DLT rate was below 33% for all dose levels so the MTD was not reached. The most common reason for ending study treatment was toxicity/adverse events (33%) followed by disease progression (22%). 9 patients died during study or follow-up. Of those, 5 (56%, 2 in 10mg BID cohort, 1 in 15mg BID cohort, 2 in 50mg BID cohort) died of infection, 3 (33%, 1 in each of 10mg, 25mg, and 50mg BID cohorts) of progressive disease, and 1 (11%, 25mg BID cohort) of hemorrhage. The median overall survival for patients on study was 10.4 months (95% CI 3.3 mo - not reached). CR/CRi as best response was observed in 7/21 patients (33%, 95% CI 15-57%; 2 CR, 5 CRi; Table 2). Conclusions: DEC-RUX combination therapy was safely administered to patients with MPN-AP/BP and an MTD was not reached. Based on pre-clinical data, observed safety profile, duration of treatment, and clinical responses in this phase I trial, the Recommended Phase II Dose of RUX was selected as 25mg BID for an induction cycle followed by 10mg BID in all ensuing cycles. Molecular and bone marrow pathology responses will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Mascarenhas: Promedior: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: DSMB , Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Incyte: Other: Clinical Trial Steereing Committee, Research Funding. Hexner:Blueprint medicines: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding. Abboud:Alexion: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Baxalta: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gerson and Lehman Group: Consultancy; Cardinal: Honoraria. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Promedior: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Gilead: Research Funding; CTI: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

A Multicenter Phase II Study of Perifosine (KRX-0401) Alone and in Combination with Dexamethasone (Dex) for Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v108.11.3582.3582 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 108 (11) ◽

pp. 3582-3582 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Paul Richardson ◽

S. Lonial ◽

A. Jakubowiak ◽

J. Wolf ◽

A. Krishnan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Single Agent ◽

Gene Array ◽

In Vivo Studies ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Prior Therapy ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Perifosine is an oral, novel synthetic alkylphospholipid, with multiple effects on signal transduction pathways, including inhibition of Akt and activation of JNK. Preclinical in vitro studies showed that perifosine induces significant cytotoxicity in both multiple myeloma(MM) cell lines and patient MM cells resistant to conventional therapies, and augments dexamethasone(dex), doxorubicin, melphalan and bortezomib-induced MM cell cytotoxicity. In vivo studies showed significant antitumor activity in a human plasmacytoma mouse model. PhaseI studies in solid tumors have shown that perifosine is well tolerated at a dose of up to150mg daily, with responses also seen. We report preliminary results of a PhaseII trial of perifosine, alone and in combination with dex, in patients(pts) with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Pts received 150mg of perifosine daily for a 21-day(d) cycle, and were assessed by serum and/or urine electrophoresis. Eligible pts had relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM with measurable disease. Pts were permitted bisphosphonate treatment. Concomitant steroids(prednisone>10 mg/d), serum creatinine of >3.0 mg/dL, and hemoglobin<8.0g/dL within 14 d of enrollment were exclusion criteria. Progressing pts, documented on 2 occasions at least one week apart, had dex 20 mg twice per week added to perifosine. Toxicities were assessed by NCI-CTCAE, v3.0. 40 pts (22 men and 18 women, median age 61 y, range 38–78) have been treated to date. All had relapsed/refractory MM, with a median of 4 lines of prior treatment (range 1–9). Prior therapy included dex(100%), thalidomide(100%), bortezomib(73%), lenalidomide(28%) and stem cell transplant(73%). Among 25 pts currently evaluable for response, best response(EBMT criteria) to single agent perifosine after≥2 cycles was stable disease(<25% reduction in M-protein) in 6 pts(24%). Dex was added in 15 of 25 pts with PD, with 9 pts evaluable for response on the combination: 3 pts(33%) achieved MR and 2(22%) pts achieved SD. The most common adverse events included nausea (45%, 3% grade 3); vomiting (40%); diarrhea(40%); fatigue(24%, 3% grade 3), and increased creatinine(55%, 11% grade 3/4 in the context of PD and light chain nephropathy). 2 pts had G3 neutropenia which resolved. Dose reduction(150 to 100 mgs/d) was required in 11 pts and 4 pts discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Attributable toxicities otherwise proved manageable with appropriate supportive care and perifosine was generally well tolerated, with no peripheral neuropathy or DVT seen. Perifosine as monotherapy and in combination with dex has activity in pts with advanced, relapsed/refractory MM, achieving MR and/or stabilization of disease in 55% of evaluable pts to date. It was generally well tolerated, although caution in pts with renal dysfunction is warranted. PK, IHC and gene array studies are ongoing. Future studies evaluate perifosine at other dosing schedules and in combination with other agents including bortezomib.

Download Full-text

Subcutaneous Omacetaxine (OM) Treatment of Chronic Phase (CP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients Following Multiple Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Failure

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.2290.2290 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 2290-2290 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Jorge E. Cortes ◽

Meir Wetzler ◽

Jeff Lipton ◽

Franck E Nicolini ◽

Michele Baccarani ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Median Duration ◽

Bone Marrow Failure ◽

Single Agent ◽

Chronic Phase ◽

Cytogenetic Response ◽

Employment Equity ◽

Equity Ownership ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2290 Introduction: Multiple TKI failure is a growing problem in a subset of CML patients. Treatment with a third TKI after two have failed often yields poor results. New treatment options are needed for this patient population. OM is a first-in-class cetaxine with demonstrated activity as a single agent in CML. It inhibits the production of short-lived oncoproteins (such as Mcl-1) involved in cancer cell survival via a mechanism independent of Bcr-Abl binding. Several studies have suggested that OM has a favorable toxicity profile when given to patients with CML via the subcutaneous route. We explored OM efficacy and safety in a subset of patients who had received therapy with multiple prior approved TKI. Methods: We analyzed a subset of adult CML-CP patients who had received two or more TKI (imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib), from a combined interim dataset of two prospective Phase 2 studies (CML-202, for patients with the T315I kinase domain mutation, and CML-203, for patients with failure to ≥2 TKI) utilizing OM in the treatment adult patients with all phases of CML who had failed TKI. TKI failure was defined as no complete hematologic response (CHR) by 12 weeks (wk), no cytogenetic response by 6 months (mo), no major cytogenetic response (MCyR) by 12 mo, loss of CHR or MCyR, or progressive leukocytosis. The focus of this analysis was to assess the CHR and MCyR response rates as well as the overall safety of OM in these patients. Adverse events presented are Grade 3/4 events that occurred in ≥ 5% of patients (regardless of causality). Results: A total of 73 of the 93 CML-CP patients from these two studies had received two or more TKI prior to OM treatment. Median time from initial CML diagnosis to first dose of OM was 74.4 months. Mutations of any kind were seen in 48% of the patients, whereas 29% had no identified mutation and 23% had no available data on mutation status. Sixty (82%) of these 73 patients achieved or maintained (twelve patients were in CHR at study entry) a CHR and 17 (23%) achieved a MCyR (9 complete and 8 partial). The median duration of MCyR was 4.4+ months (range 1.2–14.1+). Median overall survival for patients treated with OM after failure of 2 or more TKI has not yet been reached [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 22.9, NA months] (Figure 1). Eleven patients had a treatment—emergent adverse event leading to death, and two deaths were probably related to study drug. Median progression-free survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 6.5, 13.8 months). Median follow-up time was 7.5 months for all patients with twenty-five patients remaining on study at the time of this data cut. A total of 36 of the 93 CP patients from these two studies had been treated with three or more TKI; 27 (75.0%) achieved or maintained a CHR and 7 (19.4%) achieved a MCyR (4 complete and 3 partial) on OM treatment. The median duration of MCyR in this group was 4.0+ months (range 1.2–11.5+) at the time of data cut-off. The primary Grade 3/4 adverse events in patients who received OM after failure of 2 or more TKI were hematologic, including thrombocytopenia (64%), neutropenia (48%) and anemia (40%) most commonly, followed by febrile neutropenia (12%), bone marrow failure (12%), pancytopenia (7%) and febrile bone marrow aplasia (6%). These events were dosing schedule dependent. Clinical sequelae were uncommon and managed with transient treatment interruptions and dose adjustments. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events were infrequent, with only fatigue (6%) occurring ≥5% of patients. Conclusions: OM, through a mechanism of action independent of Bcr-Abl, may offer a clinically viable option for patients who have progressed on multiple TKI treatment. Disclosures: Off Label Use: The drug is currently in development and has an NDA submitted for use in TKI resistant CML. Cram: ChemGenex: Employment, Equity Ownership. Humphriss: ChemGenex: Employment, Equity Ownership. Benichou: ChemGenex: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Craig: ChemGenex: Employment, Equity Ownership, Executive Management Level.

Download Full-text

A Sequential Two-Stage Dose Escalation Study Evaluating The Safety and Efficacy Of Eltrombopag In Thrombocytopenic Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Resistant To Hypomethylating Agents (HMA)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2760.2760 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2760-2760 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Rami S Komrokji ◽

Vu H. Duong ◽

Ling Zhang ◽

Ji-Hyun Lee ◽

Eric Padron ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Median Duration ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Thrombocytopenia remains a critical management challenge for MDS pts. The outcome of MDS Pts after HMA failure is poor. Eltrombopag is an oral, small non-peptide thormbopoeitin (TPO) receptor agonist. It has biologically distinct effects in part to its binding site on the TPO receptor that is distinct from that for native TPO and other synthetic agonists. We conducted an investigator initiated study with eltrombopag in MDS pts with thrombocytopenia after HMA failure. Methods The study is a phase 1, dose escalation design. Pts are allocated to dose cohorts of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300mg/day. Each dose cohort includes 6 pts. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20-30% myeloblasts. Pts must have at least one prior HMA treatment. The mean platelet count within a month of enrollment must be ≤ 50 X 109 /L. Key exclusions include splenic enlargement > 8 cm, bone marrow fibrosis ≥ grade 3, and prior TPO agonist use. The primary objective of the study is to determine the MTD. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as treatment related non-hematological grade 3-4 toxicity. If no DLTs were observed during the first 2 cycles of therapy, the next cohort of patients receives a higher dose of eltrombopag. Pts who did not receive treatment for 8 weeks were replaced for DLT assessment. The secondary endpoints include response, overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). Results Thirty-one pts were enrolled. Table-1 summarizes baseline characteristics. Most pts had higher risk MDS who were heavily pretreated. The median interval from MDS diagnosis was 28 months. Six pts were enrolled in cohort 1 (50 mg), 10 pts in cohort 2 (100 mg) (4 pts replaced (2 deaths unrelated to treatment, 1 infection, 1 progressive disease (PD)), 12 pts were enrolled in cohort 3 (150 mg) where 6 pts were replaced (5 PD and 1 infection), and to date, 3 pts are enrolled in cohort 4 (200 mg). No protocol defined DLT have been encountered to date. No grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events have been reported. The most common adverse events that were deemed possibly, or probably related to study drug included fatigue (n=9), diarrhea (n=6), night sweats (n=3), headache (n=3), numbness (n=3). There were 2 pts with grade 2 pneumonia and grade 3 fatigue, and 2 grade 2 diarrhea events. Seven pts (23%) developed leukocytosis on treatment and 13 pts (42%) experienced an increase in circulating myeloblasts at some point during study treatment. Three of 27 pts developed higher grade bone marrow myelofibrosis (change from grade 0-1 to grade 2-3), one of whom received the 50 mg dose and 2 pts on the150 mg dose. Eleven pts (35%) progressed to AML, 9 out of 11 patients who progressed had RAEB-2 or RAEB-t and 5 had poor risk cytogenetics. The median follow up duration is 23 months. The best response on study per IWG 2006 criteria include marrow CR (mCR) + Hematological improvement (HI) (6%, n=2), mCR (3%, n=1), HI (13%, n=4), stable disease (SD) (29%, n=9), PD (36%, n=11) and not evaluable for response (13%, n=4). The overall response rate (HI+) was 22% (7 out 31 pts) and 26% among pts evaluable for response (7 out of 27 pts). HI included 6 platelet responses and 1 erythroid response. Among 20 pts who were platelet transfusion dependent, 6 became transfusion independent (30%). The median duration of response was 3.3 months. The median duration of treatment is 2 months. The most common reasons for eltrombopag discontinuation were PD (48%) and infection (10%). Median OS was 5 months whereas median OS was 8 months among HI+ responders. The median LFS was 3.5 months. Conclusions Eltrombopag yielded modest responses in heavily treated higher risk MDS pts after HMA failure. Leukocytosis, increased circulating myeloblasts and myelofibrosis were observed in subsets of pts. Future development of eltrombopag as a single agent in MDS should be in lower risk MDS or in combination with HMA in higher risk MDS. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of eltrombopag in MDS.

Download Full-text

Descriptive Analysis of Bortezomib Use in Multiple Myeloma in Four Adult University Teaching Hospitals in Quebec, Canada

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.5573.5573 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 5573-5573

Author(s):

Nathalie Marcotte ◽

Marie-Claude Michel ◽

Louise Deschenes ◽

Nathalie Letarte ◽

Daniel Froment ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Progression ◽

26S Proteasome ◽

University Teaching ◽

Therapeutic Drug ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Lymphoplasmacytic Lymphoma ◽

Off Label

Abstract Background: Bortezomib, a reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome widely used in the treatment of multiple myeloma, is now being used in various other indications. Pharmacy directors gave the Therapeutic Drug Management Program (TDMP - www.pgtm.qc.ca) the mandate to evaluate bortezomib use in four University Hospitals in Quebec, Canada. Objectives: Describe bortezomib use for all indications in our hospitals and review its utilisation in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Methods: A review of pharmacy databases was performed to identify patients who received bortezomib between June1st 2012 and May 31st 2013. The pharmaceutical and medical records of every patient who received bortezomib were reviewed to assess the treatment, pathology and adverse events. Results: Two hundred and thirty two bortezomib regimens were administered to 227 different patients during the study period. Median age was 68. The most frequent indication (55%) was first-line treatment of multiple myeloma (n=128) followed by treatment of relapsed/refractory disease (31%) (n=73). Various other indications, including amyloidosis (n=17), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n=12) and mantle cell lymphoma (n=2), represented 13% of the population. At the time of data analysis, 35% of patients were still treated with bortezomib, 25% had finished their planned treatment and 34% had discontinued treatment because of adverse events or disease progression. Fifteen patients (6%) died during the study period. Among the 45 patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), the main regimen used was the association of bortezomib and dexamethasone (VelDex) (n=27), primarily using subcutaneous bortezomib (n=24) at 1.3 mg/m2 (n=30). Median treatment duration was four cycles. Twenty-eight patients have undergone ASCT and only two progressed. The association of bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) (54.2%) followed by VelDex (29%) and the association of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyborD) (16.8%) were the regimens used in the population (n=83) not eligible to ASCT. Response rate using international uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma was 47.9% excluding patients still receiving treatment at the time of data collection. Seventy three patients received bortezomib for relapsed/refractory myeloma. Of these patients, thirty two (43.8%) discontinued therapy, nineteen due to disease progression, eight for the occurrence of side effects and five for other reasons. The initial dose was variable, from 1.0 to 1.6 mg/m2, and close to half of this patient population received CYBorD (49.4%), followed by VelDex (30.2%) and VMP protocols (15%). The number of cycles for patients who completed treatment (4 to 9) as well as the median exposure time (57 to 223 days) was also highly variable. Respectively 8.5% and 10.9% of the population treated with bortezomib for multiple myeloma were hospitalized (n=17) or had to discontinue treatment (n=22) because of adverse events (mostly hematologic toxicity, peripheral neuropathy or gastro-intestinal toxicity). Conclusions: Bortezomib is widely used in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Treatment algorithms should be developed and implemented to optimize the use of bortezomib, particularly in the relapsed/refractory setting. Standard regimens should also be implemented in each center. The utilisation of pre-printed orders for the prescription of chemotherapy regimens promotes uniform prescription. A review of the literature should be performed and recommendations should be made for the use of bortezomib in off-label indications like amyloidosis and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma. Disclosures Off Label Use: bortezomib use in amyloidosis and lymphoplasmacitic lymphoma. Lemieux-Blanchard:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen and Janssen: Other: preceptorship. Bérard:Janssen: Honoraria. Sebag:Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib in Combination with High-Dose Dexamethasone and Continuous Low-Dose Oral Cyclophosphamide for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v106.11.2549.2549 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 106 (11) ◽

pp. 2549-2549 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Martin Kropff ◽

Guido Bisping ◽

Peter Liebisch ◽

Orhan Sezer ◽

Hermann Einsele ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Low Dose ◽

Response Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Median Number ◽

High Dose ◽

Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽

Minor Response ◽

Chromosome 13 ◽

Dose Oral

Abstract Single agent bortezomib treatment yields ≥ partial responses (PR) in 24% of patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (MM) and 38% of patients who had received 1 – 3 previous therapies. Dexamethasone (DEX) adds to anti-myeloma activity of bortezomib. The present phase II trial was intitiated to study bortezomib combined with DEX and continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide (CY). 50 patients with advanced MM were scheduled to receive bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 4, 8, and 11 q 3 weeks for 8 cycles in combination with DEX 20 mg PO on the day of bortezomib injection and the day thereafter, and CY 50 mg PO daily; followed by 3 cycles bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV days 1, 8, 15, and 22 q 5 weeks in combination with corresponding DEX and CY schedules. Patient characteristics included median age 63 years; B2M > 3,0 mg/L, 64%; CRP > 3,0 mg/L, 25%; deletion of chromosome 13, 46%; median number of prior regimens, 2 (range 1 – 9), and prior standard therapy > 12 mo, 94 %. 78% of patients had relapsed after high-dose melphalan. The EBMT criteria were used for definition of response. Five patients (10%) achieved a complete response, 33 (66%) a PR, and 6 (12%) a minor response (MR) resulting in an overall response rate (≥MR) of 88%. On an intention-to-treat basis, median event-free survival (EFS) with this combination was 10 months. After a median follow-up of 10 months, median overall survival has not been reached. Notably, chromosome 13 deletion was predictive of a favorable outcome (higher response rate, longer EFS) in this setting. The median number or treatment cycles given was 6. 56% of the patients terminated study treatment prematurely, mainly for disease progression (10%) or adverse events (34%). Grade 4 neutropenia during at least one treatment cycle occurred in one patient (2%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 17%; one thrombocytopenic bleeding. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities requiring dose or schedule modifications included infections (26%), peripheral neuropathy (25%), fatigue (15%), herpes zoster (13%), and cardiovascular events (11%). One patient succumbed to infection without predisposing neutropenia. Bortezomib in combination with DEX and CY appears to be a highly active regimen without increased toxicity compared to a single agent treatment with bortezomib. Maintenance treatment might be required for prolonged EFS.

Download Full-text