Ongoing Phase 1a/1b Dose-Finding Study of CWP232291 (CWP291) in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM)

Abstract Background: CWP291, a novel peptidomimetic small molecule, has potent and selective inhibitory activity on a Wnt gene reporter and decreases expression of the β-catenin target genes, cyclin D1 and survivin. It has broad anti-cancer efficacy in vitro, outperforming lenalidomide and bortezomib in multiple myeloma murine xenografts and demonstrating improved survival when used in combination with lenalidomide in bone marrow engraftment models. Methods: Subjects with relapsed or refractory MM were infused CWP291 iv over at least 30 minutes twice weekly for 3 weeks out of a 4-week cycle in a 3+3 dose-escalation, Phase 1 design. Results: Results as of July 15, 2016 over a dose range of 198 - 446 mg/m2 in 9 subjects are reported. Median duration of treatment was 3 cycles (range 1.3 - 6.5 cycles) with 3 subjects ongoing. The most common (>20% of subjects) drug-related adverse events (AEs) were due to GI toxicities, including diarrhea (77.8%), nausea (55.6%) and constipation (33.3%). Toxicity was mostly ≤grade 2, however grade 3/4 events were frequently related to myelosuppression, including neutropenia (33.3%), and anemia and thrombocytopenia (22.2% each). Serious adverse events were recorded for 5 subjects with 8 separate events: 6 events in 4 subjects considered unrelated were hospitalizations for pneumonia, and 2 events in 1 subject each considered possibly related were a urinary tract infection and grade 3 hypoxia. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 2 patients at 446 mg/m2, which were hypoxia (grade 3) and thrombocytopenia (grade 4). Accrual at 335 mg/m2 has now been initiated. Stable disease (≥3 months on therapy with no increase in M protein as per the IMWG) was seen in 4 subjects. There was also documentation of a 34.6% decrease in bone marrow plasma cells in one subject for whom a bone marrow aspirate was available. PK in the first 3 subjectsreceiving198 mg/m2showed plasma levels of the active metabolite had very little inter-patient variability, which were comparable to patients with AML receiving this same dose in another study. There was less than 4% excreted in the urine, and there was no evidence of accumulation from Day 1 to Day 18. Changes in targeted genes in blood and BM, as well as additional PK, will be provided from expanded and escalated dosing cohorts. Furthermore, preliminary observations in the Phase 1b part of this study, which combines the administration of CWP291 with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, will be reported. Conclusions: CWP291, a novel and first in class molecule with significant preclinical activity, shows single agent safety as well as early evidence of efficacy in subjects with MM. Accrual is ongoing to establish the optimal dose level for both single agent and combination therapy. Disclosures Hauptschein: JW Theriac Pharmaceutical: Employment. Choi:JW Pharmaceutical Corporation: Employment. Lee:JW Pharmaceutical Corporation: Employment.

Download Full-text

A Sequential Two-Stage Dose Escalation Study Evaluating The Safety and Efficacy Of Eltrombopag In Thrombocytopenic Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Resistant To Hypomethylating Agents (HMA)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.2760.2760 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 2760-2760 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Rami S Komrokji ◽

Vu H. Duong ◽

Ling Zhang ◽

Ji-Hyun Lee ◽

Eric Padron ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bone Marrow ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Median Duration ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Primary Objective ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Thrombocytopenia remains a critical management challenge for MDS pts. The outcome of MDS Pts after HMA failure is poor. Eltrombopag is an oral, small non-peptide thormbopoeitin (TPO) receptor agonist. It has biologically distinct effects in part to its binding site on the TPO receptor that is distinct from that for native TPO and other synthetic agonists. We conducted an investigator initiated study with eltrombopag in MDS pts with thrombocytopenia after HMA failure. Methods The study is a phase 1, dose escalation design. Pts are allocated to dose cohorts of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300mg/day. Each dose cohort includes 6 pts. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of MDS or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with 20-30% myeloblasts. Pts must have at least one prior HMA treatment. The mean platelet count within a month of enrollment must be ≤ 50 X 109 /L. Key exclusions include splenic enlargement > 8 cm, bone marrow fibrosis ≥ grade 3, and prior TPO agonist use. The primary objective of the study is to determine the MTD. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as treatment related non-hematological grade 3-4 toxicity. If no DLTs were observed during the first 2 cycles of therapy, the next cohort of patients receives a higher dose of eltrombopag. Pts who did not receive treatment for 8 weeks were replaced for DLT assessment. The secondary endpoints include response, overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). Results Thirty-one pts were enrolled. Table-1 summarizes baseline characteristics. Most pts had higher risk MDS who were heavily pretreated. The median interval from MDS diagnosis was 28 months. Six pts were enrolled in cohort 1 (50 mg), 10 pts in cohort 2 (100 mg) (4 pts replaced (2 deaths unrelated to treatment, 1 infection, 1 progressive disease (PD)), 12 pts were enrolled in cohort 3 (150 mg) where 6 pts were replaced (5 PD and 1 infection), and to date, 3 pts are enrolled in cohort 4 (200 mg). No protocol defined DLT have been encountered to date. No grade 3 or 4 treatment related adverse events have been reported. The most common adverse events that were deemed possibly, or probably related to study drug included fatigue (n=9), diarrhea (n=6), night sweats (n=3), headache (n=3), numbness (n=3). There were 2 pts with grade 2 pneumonia and grade 3 fatigue, and 2 grade 2 diarrhea events. Seven pts (23%) developed leukocytosis on treatment and 13 pts (42%) experienced an increase in circulating myeloblasts at some point during study treatment. Three of 27 pts developed higher grade bone marrow myelofibrosis (change from grade 0-1 to grade 2-3), one of whom received the 50 mg dose and 2 pts on the150 mg dose. Eleven pts (35%) progressed to AML, 9 out of 11 patients who progressed had RAEB-2 or RAEB-t and 5 had poor risk cytogenetics. The median follow up duration is 23 months. The best response on study per IWG 2006 criteria include marrow CR (mCR) + Hematological improvement (HI) (6%, n=2), mCR (3%, n=1), HI (13%, n=4), stable disease (SD) (29%, n=9), PD (36%, n=11) and not evaluable for response (13%, n=4). The overall response rate (HI+) was 22% (7 out 31 pts) and 26% among pts evaluable for response (7 out of 27 pts). HI included 6 platelet responses and 1 erythroid response. Among 20 pts who were platelet transfusion dependent, 6 became transfusion independent (30%). The median duration of response was 3.3 months. The median duration of treatment is 2 months. The most common reasons for eltrombopag discontinuation were PD (48%) and infection (10%). Median OS was 5 months whereas median OS was 8 months among HI+ responders. The median LFS was 3.5 months. Conclusions Eltrombopag yielded modest responses in heavily treated higher risk MDS pts after HMA failure. Leukocytosis, increased circulating myeloblasts and myelofibrosis were observed in subsets of pts. Future development of eltrombopag as a single agent in MDS should be in lower risk MDS or in combination with HMA in higher risk MDS. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Use of eltrombopag in MDS.

Download Full-text

Bortezomib in Combination with Dexamethasone for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.4923.4923 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 4923-4923

Author(s):

Martin H. Kropff ◽

Guido Bisping ◽

Doris Wenning ◽

Wolfgang E. Berdel ◽

Joachim Kienast

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Bone Marrow ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Remission Rate ◽

Single Agent ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Minor Response ◽

Chromosome 13 ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Single agent bortezomib treatment at the dosage and schedule published by Richardson (2003) stabilizes disease in nearly 60% of patients with relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, only 35% of patients achieve an objective (≥ minor) response (MR). Dexamethasone adds to clinical anti-myeloma activity of bortezomib by inducing 18% responses in patients with either stable or progressive disease on bortezomib alone. In an attempt to improve disease response, we evaluated a primary bortezomib/dexamethasone combination in patients with multiple myeloma in ≥ 2nd untreated or refractory relapse. Eligible patients were 18–80 years old, had an ECOG performance status of 0 – 2 and adequate renal, hepatic, pulmonary and cardiac function. Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy ≥ grade 2 or neuropathic pain of any grade were exclusion criteria. However, we made no restrictions in terms of pretreatment blood counts. Fifteen consecutive patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (9/15 with ≥ 2nd untreated and 6/15 with refractory relapse; 71% with a chromosome 13 deletion) were scheduled to receive bortezomib 1.3 mg/m² IV days 1, 4, 8, 11 q 3 weeks for up to 8 cycles in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg PO once daily on the day of bortezomib injection and the day thereafter. Treatment was withheld for nonhematologic adverse events (AE) ≥ grade 3 and reinitiated at a 25% lower dose after resolution. Treatment was not stopped for myelosuppression of any grade if interim response evaluations precluded myeloma progression as the cause of cytopenia. One patient (7%) achieved a complete response, 10 (67%) a partial response, and 1 (7%) a MR resulting in an overall response rate (≥ MR) of 80% (9/9 with ≥ 2nd untreated and 3/6 with refractory relapse; EBMT/IBMTR/ABMTR criteria). Responses occurred after a median of 3 weeks and were independent of conventional prognostic parameters. Importantly, 8/10 patients with a chromosome 13 deletion achieved a ≥ PR. Adverse events, mainly myelosuppression (34% grade 3/4 neutropenia; 47% grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia), neuropathy (grade 2/3/4 20%/7%/0%) and fatigue (grade 2/3/4 20%/13%/20%), were manageable. There was no case of neutropenic infection or thrombocytopenic bleeding. Two patients suffered herpes zoster. The percentage of transfusion dependent patients decreased from 44% during the 1st treatment cycle to 23% and 11% after the 2nd and 3rd treatment cycles, respectively. Even non-responders did not experience cumulative hematologic toxicity. After a median follow-up of 5 months, median event free and overall survival were not reached. Five out of 15 patients were non-responders (n=1) or had experienced disease progression (n=4). Notably, 2 patients with sustained paraprotein and bone marrow remission (confirmed by biopsy) had extramedullary disease progression, pointing to a bone marrow restricted response to bortezomib in MM. This study indicates that bortezomib can be given safely even in patients with poor bone marrow reserve, who would not have been candidates for the SUMMIT trial. Though the remission rate was high, remissions often were not durable. This fact underlines the need for consolidating treatment and evaluation of bortezomib combinations with other anti-myeloma agents.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1/2 Trial of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.4774.4774 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 4774-4774

Author(s):

James R. Berenson ◽

Laura V. Stampleman ◽

Alberto Bessudo ◽

Peter J. Rosen ◽

Leonard M Klein ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽

Great Promise ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Background Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD), such as thalidomide and lenalidomide (LEN) and its newest derivative pomalidomide (POM), have shown great promise for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts). POM has in vitro anti-MM potency and has shown efficacy for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM pts. POM with dexamethasone (DEX) induces responses even for MM pts who are refractory to bortezomib (BORT) and LEN (Richardson et al, 2012). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with BORT is FDA-approved for the treatment of MM pts who have received one prior therapy not containing BORT. The combination of PLD and LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for both RR and frontline MM pts (Offidani et al, 2006; 2007). We have also demonstrated that both the efficacy and tolerability of LEN in combination with DEX, PLD and BORT (DVD-R) may be improved by changing the doses and schedules of these drugs (Berenson et al, 2012). Based on these results, we hypothesized that the combination of POM, DEX and PLD would be effective for the treatment of RRMM pts. Thus, we conducted the first study investigating the safety and efficacy of POM in combination with intravenous (IV) DEX and PLD as a phase 1/2 trial using a modified dose, schedule and longer 28-day cycles for pts with RRMM. Methods The phase 1 portion enrolled MM pts w/ progressive disease whereas those enrolled in phase 2 also had to be refractory to LEN (single-agent or in combination), as demonstrated by progressive disease while receiving their last LEN-containing regimen or relapsed within 8 weeks of their last dose of this IMiD. Pts who have previously received POM treatment were ineligible. In the phase 1 portion, POM was administered at 2, 3 or 4 mg daily in three cohorts on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle and DEX (40 mg) and PLD (5 mg/m2) were fixed and given intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11. Results As of June 20th, 2014, 48 pts were enrolled in the trial and a total of 47 pts had received study drug. Pts had received a median of 4 prior treatments (range 1-18), with a median of 2 prior IMiD-containing regimens (range, 0-8). Fifty-three percent of the pts had received a prior PLD-containing regimen and 21% had received a prior IMiD and PLD combination treatment. Among all enrolled pts, 40 pts discontinued treatment and seven remain active. Pts completed a median of 3 cycles (range: 1-8), with a median follow-up time of 5.4 months (range: 0-22). During the phase 1 portion of the trial, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of POM was established at 4 mg. Enrollment of pts into the phase 2 portion of the trial began at the MTD. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed at this dose in 10/17 (58.8%) phase 2 pts; and, as a result, the protocol was amended so that the MTD was lowered to 3 mg for all pts subsequently enrolled. Among the 36 pts enrolled in phase 2, 78% percent were refractory to LEN and steroids with or without other agents and 47% had previously received PLD. A median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 8) were administered among the pts enrolled in phase 2. Thirty-five pts were evaluable for response as one pt was active but had not yet had any post-baseline disease assessments. Among all pts enrolled in phase 2, the overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 29% and 49%, respectively, with 6 pts (17%) showing stable disease and 12 pts (34%) demonstrating progressive disease. For all pts enrolled in phase 2, the median follow-up time was 4.7 months (range 0-12) and the median PFS was 5.3 months. ORR and CBR for pts in the phase 2 were higher among pts receiving POM at 3 mg (32% and 58%, respectively) than among pts receiving POM at 4 mg (25% and 37%, respectively). Pts receiving the 4 mg dose of POM experienced more toxicities resulting in discontinuations, which likely explains the lower ORR and CBR observed among pts receiving this POM dose. Common ≥ grade 3 adverse events observed throughout the trial were neutropenia (21 pts; 44.7%), lymphopenia (10 pts; 21.3%), and hyponatremia (4 pts; 8.5%). One pt died of grade 5 sepsis. Conclusions This phase 1/2 trial is the first evaluating POM with PLD and DEX and demonstrates that the combination of POM at 3 mg, PLD and DEX using a modified 28-day cycle schedule is safe and effective for the treatment of MM pts refractory to LEN. Disclosures Berenson: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Swift:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Vescio:Celgene: Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Pilot Study of Genasense® (Oblimersen Sodium, Bcl-2 Antisense Oligonucleotide), Fludarabine and Rituximab in Previously Treated and Untreated Subjects with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v104.11.4827.4827 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 104 (11) ◽

pp. 4827-4827 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Asher Alban Chanan-Khan ◽

Blanche Mavromatis ◽

Kanti R. Rai ◽

Philomena Casey ◽

Steven Novick ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Lymphocyte Count ◽

Alkylating Agents ◽

Single Agent ◽

Tumor Lysis Syndrome ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Reduced Dose ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic protein closely linked to chemotherapy resistance and inferior survival in patients (pts) with CLL. Genasense(GNS) enhances apoptosis induced by fludarabine (F), dexamethasone, and rituximab (R) in vitro, and has limited single-agent activity in heavily pre-treated CLL pts. Down-regulation of Bcl-2 may further sensitize CLL cells to apoptosis induced by F and R without exposing subjects to the toxicity of alkylating agents. CLL and NHL pts occasionally exhibit a “cytokine release syndrome” (spiking fever, back pain, and occasional hypotension) with GNS treatment. We hypothesized that a “step dosing” approach with GNS, similar to that sometimes used for R, could ameliorate these effects and allow safe and effective combination of this agent with F and R. We are currently evaluating this combination in pts with either previously untreated (UT) or relapsed, previously treated (PT) CLL who require systemic treatment. Eligibility includes: plts ≥ 50,000/mm3; serum Cr ≤ 1.5 mg/dL; adequate organ function; negative Coombs; no history of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. In cycle 1, GNS is given by continuous intravenous infusion at 1.5 mg/kg/d days 1 to 7. R is given on a dose-escalating schema (day 4, 125 mg/m2; day 6, 250 mg/m2). F (25 mg/m2/d) is given on days 6 to 8. In subsequent 28-day cycles (up to 6), the dose of GNS is escalated to 3 mg/kg/d days 1 to7 days, with R 375 mg/m2 on day 5 and F days 5 to7. To date, 20 pts have been enrolled (17 PT and 3 UT). Characteristics included: median age, 62 yrs (range 39 to 82 yrs); Rai stage III (2 pts) and IV (6 pts). Prior to administration of either F or R, single-agent GNS treatment at the initial reduced dose in Cycle 1 resulted in a median decrease in lymphocytes of 15% (among all patients regardless of decline in lymphocyte count) (Baseline: 48.3 cells x 103/ml; day 4: 40.1 cells x 103/ml). For the 13 pts who experienced a decline in lymphocyte count in cycle 1 prior to F and R, the median percentage change was 17%, with 4 pts having a > 25% decrease. Three PT pts discontinued from study treatment prior to completing 6 cycles, 2 due to disease progression, and 1 with Grade 3 thrombocytopenia that was unresolved after 4 weeks. Among the 20 pts treated to date (9 ongoing), the most common grade 3 or higher adverse events have been neutropenia, pyrexia and thrombocytopenia. Serious adverse events have been noted in only 6 of 20 pts (all PT pts) and have included 2 pts with fever (1 neutropenic), 2 R infusion reactions, 1 lymph node abscess and 1 tumor lysis syndrome (with sepsis). Conclusions: 20 pts have been treated with combination GNS, F and R. Single-agent activity with GNS has been observed at a reduced dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d in cycle 1. The “step dosing” approach appears to be a well-tolerated, alternative approach to the administration of GNS. Further details of safety and efficacy will be presented.

Download Full-text

Pralatrexate Is Active in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL): Results of a Multicenter, Dose-Finding Trial.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.919.919 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 919-919

Author(s):

Steven M. Horwitz ◽

Madeleine Duvic ◽

Youn Kim ◽

Jasmine M Zain ◽

Mary Jo Lechowicz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cell ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Dose Reduction ◽

Research Funding ◽

Cell Lymphoma ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Optimal Dose ◽

T Cell Lymphoma ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 919 Background: Pralatrexate enters cancer cells via the reduced folate carrier-1 (RFC-1) and is efficiently polyglutamated by folylpolyglutamyl synthetase (FPGS), leading to high intracellular retention. In a Phase 1/2 study of patients with hematologic malignancies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in aggressive T-cell lymphoma with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 30 mg/m2 once weekly for 6 of 7 weeks. The generally indolent course of CTCL may be better treated at lower doses in a maintenance fashion if a lower incidence and severity of adverse events can be achieved while preserving activity. PDX-010 is an open-label, single-agent, multicenter, Phase 1 dose-reduction trial in patients with relapsed or refractory CTCL. The primary objective is to identify an optimal dose and schedule of pralatrexate for these patients. Methods: Eligibility included mycosis fungoides (MF), Sézary syndrome (SS), and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL); with disease progression after at least 1 prior systemic therapy. The pralatrexate dose and schedule started at 30 mg/m2 by IV push on 3 of 4 weeks and subsequent cohorts received reduced doses (20, 15, 10 mg/m2) and/or schedules (3/4 or 2/3 weeks) of pralatrexate based on tolerability. All patients received supplementation with vitamin B12 1 mg intramuscularly every 8-10 weeks and folic acid 1 mg orally once daily. As we sought a well tolerated regimen the definition of DLTs to trigger dose reduction included toxicities such as grade ≥ 3 neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 thrombocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, grade ≥ 2 mucositis/stomatitis, and any toxicity leading to dose omission or reduction in cycle 1. If DLT occurred and a response was seen, the following cohort was opened at the next lower dose or next less frequent schedule. Response was evaluated by modified severity-weighted adjustment tool (SWAT) every 2 cycles for 6 months and then every 4 cycles. For patients with lymph node involvement, scans were completed at baseline and upon clinical response or end of treatment, whichever occurred first. Results: Thirty-one patients received pralatrexate, with 18 (58%) men and median age of 57 yrs (range, 30-81). Patients had received a median of 6 prior therapies (range, 1-25). Cohorts at the following doses/schedules were enrolled: 30 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=2), 20 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=3), 20 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=7), 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=6), 15 mg/m2 x 2/3 weeks (n=3), and 10 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks (n=10). Patients received pralatrexate for a median of 72 days (range, 7-491+); 4 patients received >10 cycles of treatment. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were mucositis (18 patients [58%]), nausea (14 patients [45%]), fatigue (14 patients [45%]), pyrexia (7 patients [23%]), vomiting (6 patients [19%]), anemia (6 patients [19%]), and edema (5 patients [16%]). Grade 3-4 treatment-related toxicities in >1 patient each were mucositis (4 patients [13%]) and anemia (2 patients [6%]). Mucositis was dose limiting (≥ grade 2) in 8 patients (26%). A total of 11 responses were observed, including 2 complete responses and 9 partial responses. In the 18 patients who received pralatrexate at a dose intensity of 15 mg/m2 x 3/4 weeks or greater, the objective response rate was 56% (10/18 patients). This appeared to be the threshold dose for substantial activity in CTCL, below which the incidence of responses decreased in this dose de-escalation trial. Conclusion: Pralatrexate shows impressive activity in the treatment of relapsed CTCL. The optimal dose and schedule that provided activity with tolerability for CTCL was determined to be pralatrexate 15 mg/m2 weekly on 3 of 4 weeks. This cohort is being expanded to better assess efficacy and durability. Disclosures: Horwitz: Allos Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Duvic:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Fruchtman:Allos Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment.

Download Full-text

Phase 1/2 Trial Of Lenalidomide In Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Prednisone (REP) In Patients With Lenalidomide-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (REPEAT-study)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v122.21.287.287 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 122 (21) ◽

pp. 287-287 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Inger S. Nijhof ◽

Sonja Zweegman ◽

Mark-David Levin ◽

Harry R. Koene ◽

Aart Beeker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Dose Level ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Oral Cyclophosphamide ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Levels

Abstract Background The outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) patients who are no longer responding to thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and bortezomib (BORT) is very poor, with a median event-free survival of 5 months and median overall survival (OS) of 9 months (Kumar SK et al, Leukemia 2012; 26;149-157). We have previously shown in a small retrospective study that the combination of continuous low dose oral cyclophosphamide (endoxan) and prednisone combined with lenalidomide (REP) had remarkable activity in heavily pretreated LEN-refractory multiple myeloma patients (median 6 lines of previous chemotherapy) (vd Donk et al; Br J Haematol 2010;148(2):335-7). To determine the optimal dose of lenalidomide with continuous cyclophosphamide and prednisone, we initiated a prospective study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the REP regimen and to assess its efficacy and safety in LEN-refractory MM patients. Here we report safety and efficacy data from the phase 1 dose-escalation part of the REPEAT-study (NCT01352338). Patients and Methods Patients aged ≥ 18 years with LEN-refractory MM, ECOG-performance status 0-3 and adequate kidney, liver and hematologic function were included. Five dose levels were evaluated using a standard 3+3 design, based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Patients received LEN in doses ranging from 10-25 mg/day on days 1-21 of 28-day cycle, while oral cyclophosphamide (50 or 100 mg) and prednisone (20 mg) were given continuously. Therapy was continued until progression. The MTD for the phase 2 part is defined as the highest dose level with 0 or 1 DLT's observed in 6 patients. Results Up till now, 35 patients were enrolled (22 in phase 1 and 13 in phase 2) from August 2011 to June 2013. The phase 2 part is still recruiting and data are not evaluable yet. One patient in phase 1 was excluded because of study violation and is not included in the analysis. The median age of the 21 evaluable patients in phase 1 was 69 years (range 41-73); 76% were male. The median duration of the disease from diagnosis was 41 months (range 18-96), median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 2-6), and 12 patients (57%) had previously received autologous SCT. All patients were LEN-refractory, 19 (90%) had prior BORT treatment, and 16 (76%) had BORT-refractory MM. Fifty-five % of the patients were considered high risk by FISH. At the time of analysis, 16 of 21 patients in phase 1 have discontinued treatment because of disease progression (13), alternative treatment (allo-SCT) (1), or adverse events (2). The MTD was defined as LEN 25 mg days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, combined with oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and prednisone 20 mg continuously (dose level 4), based on three patients experiencing a DLT: two developed pneumonia (in dose levels 4 and 5; CTC grade 3), and one patient at dose level 5 experienced CTC grade 3 dyspnea. Neutropenia (18%) and thrombocytopenia (18%) were the most common grade 3 hematological adverse events (AEs), which were managed with growth factor support and/or dose modification. There were no grade 4 hematologic AEs. Grade 3 respiratory tract infections (29%) and grade 2 fatigue (19%) were the most common non-hematological AEs. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 1 patient. Figure 1 shows a waterfall plot of the responses of the patients that participated in the phase 1 part of the study. Overall response rate (≥ PR) was 67% with 6 out of 21 (29%) patients achieving at least VGPR. In addition 2 patients achieved MR (≥ MR: 76%). Median PFS and OS were 6.3 and 15.5 months respectively. Similar results were achieved in the subset of patients with LEN- and BORT-refractory disease. Interestingly, laboratory experiments with purified myeloma cells from these patients suggest synergism between LEN and cyclophosphamide. Conclusions The REP regimen induces high response rates and prolonged PFS and OS in LEN-refractory patients with acceptable toxicity. The MTD is defined as LEN 25 mg days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, combined with oral cyclophosphamide 50 mg and prednisone 20 mg continuously. Phase 2 is enrolling patients and evaluates efficacy and safety of the REP regimen at the MTD. REP should be considered a valuable salvage option for LEN-refractory MM patients. We will present an updated follow-up at ASH. Disclosures: Sonneveld: Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding. Lokhorst:Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson-Cilag: Honoraria; Mudipharma: Honoraria. van de Donk:Celgene: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of the Investigational Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib Alone or in Combination with Lenalidomide–Dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese Patients (Pts) with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v124.21.5752.5752 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 124 (21) ◽

pp. 5752-5752 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Hiroshi Handa ◽

Kenshi Suzuki ◽

Takaaki Chou ◽

Takafumi Matsushima

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Proteasome Inhibitor ◽

Research Funding ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Japanese Patients ◽

M Protein ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Ongoing Phase

Background Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor to be investigated clinically for the treatment of MM. Phase 1 studies have shown single-agent activity and manageable toxicities in RRMM (Kumar et al. Blood 2014) and phase 1/2 studies have suggested the feasibility and activity of weekly oral ixazomib plus Rd in previously untreated MM (Kumar et al. ASH 2012; Richardson et al. ASH 2013). These findings have led to ongoing phase 3 trials of weekly ixazomib 4 mg + Rd in RRMM and previously untreated MM. However, the early-phase studies were conducted in Western pts. This phase 1, open-label multicenter study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of weekly ixazomib alone or with Rd in Japanese pts with RRMM (Japic Clinical Trials Information no. 121822). Methods Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and adverse events (AEs), and the PK of ixazomib alone or with Rd. A secondary objective was evaluation of antitumor activity. Japanese pts aged ≥20 years with RRMM who had received at least 2 prior regimens, which must have included bortezomib, thalidomide or lenalidomide, and corticosteroids, were eligible. All had measurable disease and ECOG performance status of 0–2. Pts with grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy or grade ≥2 diarrhea at study entry were excluded. Pts received ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles, alone or with Rd (lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1–21, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22), per the regimen used in the ongoing phase 3 trials. AEs were graded per NCI-CTCAE v4.03. Blood samples for PK analysis were taken at multiple time points prior to and after dosing on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1. Responses were assessed per IMWG uniform response criteria. Results Fourteen pts were enrolled; 8 (57%) were male, median age was 62.5 yrs (range 53–71), 4 pts were aged ≥65 yrs, median number of prior therapies was 7. Seven pts received single-agent ixazomib and 7 received ixazomib + Rd. One pt in each cohort was excluded from the DLT-evaluable population. Two patients experienced DLTs in cycle 1: 1 pt receiving single-agent ixazomib had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 diarrhea, hypertension, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, and nausea; 1 pt in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. All events were considered treatment-related. At data cut-off (Jan 6 2014), 6 pts remained on treatment and 8 had discontinued due to: progressive disease (PD; n=3), AEs (n=3), symptomatic deterioration, and protocol violation (each n=1). At data cut-off, pts (n=14) had received a median of 6 cycles of ixazomib (range 1–21); the 7 pts in the ixazomib + Rd cohort had received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–12) of ixazomib + Rd. Thirteen (93%) pts experienced treatment-related AEs; the most common were neutropenia (71%), thrombocytopenia (71%), leukopenia (64%), lymphopenia (57%), and diarrhea (50%). There were no cases of peripheral neuropathy. Nine (64%) pts had grade ≥3 AEs; the most common were lymphopenia (50%), neutropenia (43%), and thrombocytopenia (36%). Two (14%) pts (single-agent cohort) had serious AEs (grade 2 bronchitis in 1 pt, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 hypokalemia in 1 pt). Three pts discontinued due to AEs; 1 due to diarrhea in the single-agent cohort, and 1 due to neutropenia and 1 due to thrombocytopenia in the ixazomib + Rd cohort. There were no deaths. PK data showed ixazomib was rapidly absorbed with a Tmax at 1.08–1.83 hrs. Terminal half-life (geometric mean) was 5.7 days for single-agent ixazomib and 5.2 days for ixazomib + Rd. There were no substantial differences in the ixazomib PK profile between the two cohorts. Thirteen pts were response-evaluable. One pt (ixazomib + Rd cohort) had a partial response; at data cut-off, this pt remained in response with a 100% M-protein reduction (unconfirmed VGPR) and duration of response of ~10.8 months. Seven pts had stable disease (including 3 with M-protein reductions of 25–50%), 2 had PD, and 3 were not assessable. Conclusions These data suggest that ixazomib 4 mg alone or with Rd is feasible and tolerable in Japanese pts with RRMM. The AEs were manageable, reflecting the AE profile seen in Western populations, supporting the use of this dose and schedule in Japanese pts. Disclosures Handa: Celgene: Research Funding; Yakult: Research Funding; Kirin: Research Funding; Chugai: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Investigational agent ixazomib for the treatment of Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.. Matsushima:Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited : Employment.

Download Full-text

Effect of lenalidomide (LEN) on biochemical responses and clinical benefit (CB) as a single agent in chemotherapy-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.5_suppl.128 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽

pp. 128-128 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Chadi Nabhan ◽

Anand Patel ◽

Dana Villines ◽

Kathy Tolzien ◽

Susan K. Kelby ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Adverse Events ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Single Agent ◽

Complete Response ◽

Median Number ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Biochemical Responses ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Dose Reductions

128 Background: LEN has anti-angiogenesis and immunomodulatory properties making it ideal to investigate in CRPC. We report on a phase II study investigating LEN in chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients (pts) Methods: Eligible pts received LEN at 25 mg daily on days 1 – 21 every 28-days until progression. Daily aspirin or coumadin were required. Responses were assessed every 2 cycles. Toxicity was assessed every cycle. Primary end point: The CB of LEN [Sum of complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD)]. Secondary end points: Toxicity, time to radiographic and PSA progression (TTP and TTP-PSA), time to next treatment (TTNT), overall survival (OS), and LEN’s impact on quality of life (QOL). Results: 31 pts were enrolled; 27 response-evaluable (1 withdrew consent, 3 off per choice after adverse events). Median age is 74 (range 58-89) with 24 (77%) having Gleason ≥ 7 disease. Median PSA is 66 (2.1-918.6). Six pts (19%) had liver/lung involvement. Fourteen pts (51%) showed biochemical response with 4 (15%) having >50% PSA drop. TTP-PSA is 4 months (2-11). No radiographic responses seen but 17 pts had SD for a median of 4 months (2-16) (CB=55%). Median number of LEN cycles was 3 (2-15). With a median follow-up of 18 months (5-38), 17 patients (55%) remain alive; median OS of 18 months. Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were most common (neutropenia 41%, leukopenia 12%, anemia 9%, thrombocytopenia 9%). Other grade 3/4 toxicities: venothromboembolism, atrial fibrillation, and dehydration (6% each). Serious adverse events (SAEs) were witnessed in 10 pts (32%) with only 1 (3%, rash) definitely related to LEN. Others were not related or possibly related. Of 27 pts, 7 (26%) had a dose reduction and 2 (7%) required two dose reductions. Dose reductions occurred after cycle 3. QOL scales suggested no adverse impact. Median TTNT is 2 months (9 pts received chemotherapy, 10 pts went onto studies, 3 pts received hormonal therapies, 4 pts received radiation, 3 pts had no therapy yet, and 2 pts remain on LEN). Conclusions: LEN is active as monotherapy in CRPC. Biochemical responses are witnessed and clinical benefit is observed. Myelosuppression is the most common toxicity.

Download Full-text

A Phase 1 Trial of Ruxolitinib, Lenalidomide and Methylprednisolone for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-119274 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 1988-1988

Author(s):

James R Berenson ◽

To Jennifer ◽

Tanya M. Spektor ◽

Carley Turner ◽

Regina Swift ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Adverse Events ◽

Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽

Macrophage Polarization ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Janus Kinase ◽

M2 Macrophage ◽

Inadequate Response ◽

Phase 1 Trial ◽

Grade 3

Abstract Introduction Ruxolitinib (RUX) is an FDA-approved oral, selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera who have had an inadequate response to or are intolerant of hydroxyurea or intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). Preclinical studies from our laboratory have demonstrated that RUX in combination with the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide (LEN) and dexamethasone shows marked anti-myeloma effects both in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, MUC1 is responsible for LEN resistance in MM cells, and RUX blocks its expression in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Thus, RUX may restore sensitivity to LEN. RUX also downregulates PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression on MM cells and reduces tumor stimulatory M2 macrophage polarization in MM bone marrow. Therefore, a phase 1 trial was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of RUX in combination with LEN and the steroid methylprednisolone (MP) for relapsed/refractory (RR) MM patients who had previously been treated with LEN/steroids and a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and showed progressive disease at study entry. Methods A traditional 3+3 dose escalation design was used to enroll subjects in four cohorts with expansion once a MTD was determined. Subjects received RUX twice daily continuously, LEN daily on d1-21 of a 28-d cycle and MP orally every other day. In DL0, patients received RUX 5 mg, LEN 5 mg, and MP 40 mg. In DL+1 and +2, both doses of LEN and MP remained unchanged and RUX was escalated to 10 and 15 mg, respectively. DL+3 escalated LEN to 10 mg with MP unchanged and RUX at 15 mg. Primary endpoints were safety, clinical benefit rate (CBR) and overall response rate (ORR). Results Thirty-four patients have been enrolled, and 31 were evaluable for response as of July 13, 2018. The median age was 68 years (range, 49-81), and 20 (59%) were male. Patients received a median of 6 prior treatments including lenalidomide and a PI. No DLTs occurred, and DL+3 was expanded (n=25). Among all 31 evaluable patients, the CBR and ORR were 48% and 39%, respectively (1 CR, 9 PR, 2 VGPR, and 3 MR), and 11 and 5 showed SD and PD, respectively. Notably, all 15 patients achieving ≥ MR were refractory to LEN (i.e. progressed while on or within 8 weeks of last dosage). The median PFS for all evaluable patients was 7.4 months. Grade 3/4 adverse events included transient thrombocytopenia (11.1%), anemia (8.8%), neutropenia (6.7%), hypoxia (4.4%) and gastrointestinal bleeding (4.4%). Common serious adverse events included abdominal pain (6.7%), gastrointestinal bleeding (6.7%) and hypoxia (6.7 %). Conclusions This phase 1 trial demonstrates for the first time that a JAK inhibitor, RUX, can overcome refractoriness to LEN and steroids for RRMM patients. This all oral regimen was well tolerated, and reversible Grade 3/4 cytopenias occurred in only a small minority of patients. These promising results are leading to other clinical trials using immunomodulatory agents, steroids and RUX, for treating RRMM patients, and this may represent a new therapeutic approach for these patients. Disclosures Berenson: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Download Full-text

Phase 1 Study of Bisthianostat, an Orally Efficacious Pan-HDAC Inhibitor: Part Results of Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-129683 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 5591-5591

Author(s):

Hong-Hui Huang ◽

Jian Hou ◽

Yang-Ming Zhang ◽

Yu-Bo Zhou ◽

Li Jia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Phase I ◽

Hdac Inhibitor ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Single Agent ◽

Human Study ◽

Weekly Schedule ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Expansion Phase ◽

Grade 3

Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematological malignancy. This disease remains incurable as nearly all patients will relapse and become refractory to established MM therapy. Thus, new treatment option for relapsed or refractory (R/R) MM is needed, particularly those with different mechanisms of action. One such approach is to inhibit histone deacetylase (HDAC) and produce synergistic anti-myeloma activity via mechanisms of epigenetic modulations. In 2015, panobinostat was approved by US FDA as the first HDACi to treat R/R MM in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Bisthianostat is a novel bisthiazole-based HDACi evolved from the thiazole-thiazoline cap group in natural product Largazole (Nan et al., ACS Med Chem Lett. 2014). It is orally available and displayed inhibition against a series of MM cell lines. Here we presented preliminary in-human findings from CH-020PI study, an ongoing phase 1 study of bisthianostat. (Trial registered at ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT03618602) Methods: CH-020PI is a first-in-human study to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of bisthianostat in R/R MM patients. It is a single center, open-label, single arm, dose escalating phase I study. A standard 3+3 cohort design with 100mg as the starting dose was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose of bisthianostat. This study comprised two phases: a pharmacokinetics phase and an expansion phase. In the pharmacokinetics phase, a single-dose of bisthianostat was administered on day 1, and then multiple-dose was administered on a twice-weekly schedule for 4 consecutive weeks. Patients in the expansion phase received continuous bisthianostat twice weekly until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicities. Results: Until 30 June 2019, 8 patients were enrolled at 3 dose levels from 100 to 400mg. The median age at enrollment was 62 years (range, 51-70 years). The median number of previous lines of therapy was 5 (range, 2-6). Per protocol, all of 8 patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetics, toxicities and efficacy. In the pharmacokinetic evaluation, for all the 8 patients tested at day 1, the peak concentration of bisthianostat was reached within 2.3 hours; half life time were around 4 hours; bisthianostat uptake represented by AUClast were in good proportion to the level of dose as 100, 200 and 400mg, respectively. Similar results were observed at day 28. Any grade hematological treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 4 of 8 patients (50%), while grade 3/4 hematological AEs occurred in 2 (25%) patients. Any grade non-hematological treatment-emergent AEs were observed in 3 (37.5%) patients; no grade 3/4 non-hematological AEs were reported. No patient discontinued the treatment of bisthianostat due to AEs. Except patient 007 (200mg cohort) experienced a grade 2 nausea, no patients experienced diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. It is worthy to note that gastrointestinal toxicity is common with the use of panobinostat, a FDA-approved HDAC inhibitor. Overall single-agent efficacy was modest, and stable disease (SD) was observed in 4 (50%) patients. At the time of data cut-off for statistical analysis, no dose-limiting toxicity has been observed. Conclusions: Bisthianostat proved to be well absorbed and tolerated. It exhibited modest anti-tumor efficacy in our cohort of heavily pretreated patients with R/R MM. This phase I clinical trial is currently ongoing, and future trials should compare different doses and schedules of the combination in order to optimize the treatment tolerability and enhance its efficacy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text