A Combination of Rituxan, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (RCD) Results in Long-Lasting Responses in Autoimmune Anemia and Thrombocytopenia in CLL Patients: A Single Institution Study.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2832-2832
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Kaufman ◽  
Yehuda Z. Lebowicz ◽  
Nancy Driscoll ◽  
Christina Johnson ◽  
Dale Janson ◽  
...  

Abstract Coombs positive hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) are well-known complications of chronic lymphocytic leukemia(CLL). Both are autoimmune phenomena thought to be byproducts of the immune system dysregulation manifested in patients with CLL. Rituxan, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone(RCD) are known to effectively target lymphocytes and inhibit autoimmune processes. We present our data analyzing 18 CLL patients with one or both of these autoimmune processes treated with the RCD regimen between 1998 and 3/2006. These patients consisted of 15 with AIHA alone, 2 with both AIHA and ITP and one with ITP alone. The RCD cycle consisted of rituximab 375mg/m2 iv infusion given on day 1, cyclophosphamide 750–1000mg/m2 iv (depending on CLL tumor burden) on day 2, and dexamethasone 12 mg iv on days 1 and 2, and orally days 3 through 7. These cycles were repeated at intervals of 3–4 weeks, depending upon recovery of blood counts. All 18 patients responded to treatment in terms of hgb, platelets or both. For the first episodes of AIHA (n=17) mean starting hgb was 8.1g/dL (range 4.0–12.1) and mean post-treatment hgb was 13.2 g/dL(range 10.0–15.4)(Table 1). The three patients with ITP had a platelet increase from nadirs of 1,000, 1,000 and 14,000 to 408,000, 161,000 and 135,000, respectively. Mean duration of initial response was 22 months (range 6–41). Nine patients relapsed and were retreated with RCD. Again, all 9 responded, and had a mean increase in hgb of 5.1g/dL (range 1.4–7.7) with a mean duration of second response of 16 months(range 3–33). Overall, median survival from initiation of RCD was 70 months (95% CI; 46 to an upper limit not-yet determinable, with follow-up to 8/2006). Of 8 patients with post-treatment Coombs data available for the first episode of AIHA, 4 (50%) converted to Coombs negativity (Table2) and had a mean duration of response of 23.0 months (range 12–41) vs 8.8 months for those who did not convert(range 6–11). In all AIHA episodes (including repeat episodes) with post-treatment Coombs data available (n=18), 6 of 18 (33%) converted to Coombs negativity. The mean duration of response was 19.8 months (range 6–41) for all episodes with conversion to Coombs negativity, vs 7.0 months for those without(range 3–12). This finding that Coombs conversion portends a longer duration of response suggests treatment goals for AIHA should be a conversion to Coombs negative, and not stopped with recovery of hgb. Table 1. Hemoglobin response to RCD N Mean Std Deviation Min Hgb Max Hgb at start episode 1 17 8.1 g/dL 2.1 4.0 g/dL 12.1 g/dL Hgb at end episode 1 17 13.2 g/dL 1.4 10.0 g/dL 15.4 g/dL Hgb delta episode 1 17 5.1 g/dL 2.3 1.7 g/dL 10.2 g/dL Hgb at start episode 2 9 8.4 g/dL 2.3 5.3 g/dL 12.2 g/dL Hgb at end episode 2 9 13.5 g/dL 1.4 12.3 g/dL 16.6 g/dL Hgb delta episode 2 9 5.1 g/dL 2.1 1.4 g/dL 7.7 g/dL Table 2. Post-treatment Coombs status and response duration N Mean duration of response (in months) Post-treatment Coombs negativity in episode 1 4 22.2 (range 12-41) Post-treatment Coombs positivity in episode 1 4 8.8 (range 6-11) Post-treatment Coombs negativity in all episodes 6 19.8 (range 6-41) Post-treatment Coombs positivity in all episodes 12 7.1 (range 3-12)

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 486-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Colombat ◽  
Nicole Brousse ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Patricia Franchi-Rezgui ◽  
Pierre Soubeyran ◽  
...  

Abstract As previously reported (Colombat, Blood2001;97:101), rituximab (4 weekly doses of 375mg/m²) can lead to high response rates (RR) and prolonged remissions with minimal toxicity as 1st line therapy for low tumor burden FL. We report the final analysis of a trial evaluating long term efficacy and safety of rituximab in untreated low tumor burden FL (GELF criteria). 49 patients (pts) were included in the initial trial (median age 52 yrs), 2 refused consent for the extended F/Up period, and 1 pt died at M12. Molecular bcl2-JH rearrangement was assessed throughout the study. The median F/up was 83.8 mths. Overall best RR, complete/unconfirmed RR and partial RR at D78 were 74%, 50% and 24% respectively. Median PFS was 23.5 mths for the study population. Median duration of response (34 responders at D78, i.e 6 weeks after the last rituximab dose) was 28.6 mths, but response was still maintained without any further treatment in 11 pts after 5 years (24%) and in 7 pts after 7 years (15%). 31/46 pts were bcl2 positive in blood and/or marrow samples before rituximab: 11 (35%) became negative at D50, and 20 remained positive (65%). Median PFS was 37 mths for bcl2-negative pts at D50, and 12 mths for patients remaining positive (p=0.018 Log-rank). Of the 7 pts with sustained response after 7 years, 5 were bcl2 positive at D0, 2/5 became negative at D50, and 5/5 were still negative at M84. At year 7, 4/46 pts have died (1 from myelodysplasia, 3 from NHL), 35/42 have progressed, and 7 have never progressed without any other treatment than the initial rituximab therapy. Time to progression was significantly longer in the bcl2-negative population at D50 (p= 0.018, Log-rank). Duration of response was not correlated with bcl2 status at D50, but was associated with ‘Best response CR/Cru’ (p=0.007 Log-rank). Long-term tolerance was good, with only 13 SAE observed in 13 pts during the additional 4 years of F/Up (4 surgeries for non NHL-related pathologies, 1 node biopsy, 1 sleep apnea syndrome, 1 ischemic cardiopathy, 2 deaths from NHL, 1 depression, 1 pneumonia, 1 erysipela, 1 bronchitis). This long-term update confirms that a single 4-dose rituximab treatment yields durable benefits without the toxicity of chemotherapy for pts with low burden FL : Median PFS of 23.5 mths for the cohort, 28.6 mths for responders and 37 mths for pts turning bcl2-negative at D50, 15% of pts have maintained their response after 7 years, (2bis) the quality (CR/Cru) of the initial response was associated with a longer response duration high overall survival is observed with 4 deaths/46 pts (8.6%).


Author(s):  
Irene Bargellini ◽  
Valentina Lorenzoni ◽  
Giulia Lorenzoni ◽  
Paola Scalise ◽  
Gianni Andreozzi ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To retrospectively compare long-term outcomes of first-line drug-eluting particle (DEB)- transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lipiodol-TACE, in patients with unresectable hepatocellular (HCC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed our database to identify adult patients with treatment-naïve unresectable HCC, who underwent TACE from 2006 to 2013. Patients were excluded in the absence of complete medical records relative to first TACE, 1-month follow-up, and/or sufficient follow-up data. Periprocedural complications, duration of hospitalization, 1-month tumor response by mRECIST, time to tumor progression (TTP) and target tumor progression (TTTP), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results Out of an initial series of 656 patients, 329 patients were excluded for unavailability of sufficient baseline and/or follow-up data. The remaining 327 patients underwent either lipiodol-TACE (n = 160) or DEB-TACE (n = 167). Patients treated with lipiodol-TACE had a significantly higher tumor burden. By propensity score, patients were matched according to baseline differences (BCLC stage, uninodular or multinodular HCC, and unilobar or bilobar HCC), resulting in 101 patients in each treatment group. Lipiodol-TACE was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events (p = 0.03), and longer hospitalization (mean, 2.5 days vs 1.9 days; p = 0.03), while tumor response, TTP, and OS were comparable. In patients achieving 1-month complete response (CR) of target tumor, TTTP was significantly (p = 0.009) longer after DEB-TACE compared to lipiodol-TACE (median, 835 vs 353 days), resulting in a lower number of re-treatments during the entire follow-up (0.75 vs 1.6, p = 0.01). Conclusion Compared to lipiodol-TACE, DEB-TACE offers higher tolerability, reduced hospitalization, and more durable target tumor response after CR. Key Points • Compared to lipiodol-TACE, DEB-TACE is better tolerated and has reduced side effects, which translates into shorter hospitalization. • When complete radiological response according to the mRECIST is obtained 1 month after the procedure, DEB-TACE offers a more durable local tumor control compared to lipiodol-TACE. • In these patients, the longer duration of response after DEB-TACE translates into a lower number of re-interventions.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4728-4728
Author(s):  
Brady E. Beltrán-Gárate ◽  
Julia Huamani-Zavala ◽  
Alfredo Aronés-Valdivia ◽  
Antonio A. Carrasco-Yalan ◽  
Fernando Hurtado de Mendoza ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: Alemtuzumab (Campath®/Mabcampath®, a humanized anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody) has shown to be effective in the treatment of diverse hematological malignancies, including B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia. Mycosis fungoids (MF) is a low grade T-cell cutaneous lymphoma with indolent course and good prognosis while response to chemotherapy is achieved. We started a prospective phase II study in refractory relapse MF cases (advanced disease) treated with i.v. Alemtuzumab (ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT 00157274) Methods: From July 2005 to April 2006 a total of eight patients were recruited from 2 centers in Lima-Perú with hystopathological diagnosed of advanced refractory relapse MF. Inclusion criteria include: above 18 years old, ECOG status 0–2, no active infections, no more than 3 previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy, HTLV-1 negative, HIV negative, normal renal or hepatic function and written informed consent. Median age 64 years old (range: 36–72). Five were male. Median number of previous therapies was 2 (range: 2–3). Original treatment scheduled was planed as Alemtuzumab 30 mg i.v. tiw per 12 weeks with a gradually escalated doses during the first week (3, 10, 30 mg). Trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and acyclovir prophylaxis was given as regular. Median Alemtuzumab total dose was 283 mg (range: 123–706) over a median of 5 weeks of treatment (range: 3–15). The first four patients (pts.) received the programmed dosification and due toxicity the subsequent 2 pts. received Alemtuzumab 30 mg i.v. tiw for 4 weeks and then 30 mg i.v. weekly and the last 2 recruited pts. received Alemtuzumab 10 mg i.v. tiw for 4 weeks them 10 mg i.v. biw and finally 10 mg i.v. weekly. CMV monitoring with pp65 was performed in the first five pts. and qualitative PCR in the last 3 pts. Results: Seven patients were evaluated for response, overall response rate (ORR) was 57% (4/7), with two pts. achieving complete remission (CR), two pts. with partial response (PR) and three pts. progressive disease (PD) during treatment. Response duration and follow-up and CMV status is described in table 1. Median Pruritus Analogue Scale was reduced from 4 to 1. Grade 1 neutropenia in one pt. and grade 1 thrombocytopenia in one pt. One patient developed urosepsis caused by E. Coli. No cardiac toxicity was reported. Kaposi’s sarcoma was discovered in a CR pt. (pt 4, table 1) Conclusions: Alemtuzumab shows promising clinical activity in patients with advanced MF previously treated. Alemtuzumab s.c. as maintenance therapy or in combination with other agents should be explored in advanced MF. Table 1. Outcomes, follow up and CMV status Alemtuzumab TD (mg) Response Follow-up (m.) CMV status TD=total dose, NE=no evaluable, AD=active disease, m=months, R=Reactivation, F=Fever 1 123 NE AD, 14 m. R with F 2 313 PD Died, 8 m. 3 706 PD AD, 8 m. 4 403 CR Relapse at 6 m. R with F 5 253 CR Relapse at 3 m. R with F 6 493 PR PR, 5 m. 7 123 PR Relapse at 3 m. R no F 8 163 PD AD, 3 m. R no F


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14592-14592
Author(s):  
G. G. Fareau ◽  
R. Vassilopoulou-Sellin

14592 Background: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer associated with a poor prognosis. We describe our experience with the effectiveness of various chemotherapies in the treatment of ACC. Methods: We performed a detailed retrospective review of every patient diagnosed with ACC at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between the years 1980 and 2000. We included only those patients with a histological diagnosis of ACC who had radiologically measurable disease and received chemotherapy followed by post-treatment imaging. Patients without a pathological diagnosis, serial imaging studies, or adequate follow-up were excluded from our study. In each case, we compared radiological tumor burden after a given drug or drug combination to the radiological tumor burden preceding the treatment session. Radiologist reports were used to categorize post-treatment imaging studies as showing either a decrease in tumor burden, no change in tumor burden, or an increase in tumor burden. Patients who did not have post-treatment imaging due to rapid progressive clinical deterioration were regarded as having increased tumor burden. Results: 224 patients with a diagnosis of ACC were identified in our database, of which 62 had histological confirmation and received chemotherapy with documented radiological follow-up. 38 different chemotherapeutic regimens were reviewed. Patients given single agent fluorouracil, taxol, taxotere, trimetrexate, navelbine, and patients given combination treatment with cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/cisplatin, gemcitabine/taxotere, and mitotane/cisplatin/taxol did not show any improvement. Treatment with single agent mitotane and combination VP-16/cisplatin resulted in either no change or decrease in tumor burden in over 50% of sessions. Promising trends were seen in patients treated with single agent VP-16 and carboplatinum, and with combination adriamycin/cisplatin/ifosfamide, mitotane/cisplatin, and VP-16/adriamycin/cisplatin. Conclusions: We have identified specific drugs and drug combinations of no apparent benefit in this cohort, and have also identified select agents and combinations which offer benefit. Further prospective clinical trials should focus on the use of those agents and combinations which offer benefit. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 770-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Raphael ◽  
J W Andersen ◽  
R Silber ◽  
M Oken ◽  
D Moore ◽  
...  

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a study in which patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized between a regimen consisting of chlorambucil (30 mg/m2 orally day 1) and prednisone (80 mg orally days 1 to 5) (C + P) administered every 2 weeks and a more intensive regimen of cyclosphosphamide (300 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 5), vincristine (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] day 1), and prednisone (100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 5) (CVP) given every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued for up to 18 months to maximal response. Of the 122 eligible patients, 60 received C + P, while 62 received CVP. With a median follow-up of 7 years, there were no significant differences in survival (4.8 v 3.9 years, P = .12), complete remission (CR) rate (25% v 23%; P = .83), or duration of response (2.0 v 1.9 years; P = .78) between C + P and CVP. Toxicity was modest despite the prolonged treatment. The long median survival of 4.1 years for stage III and IV patients is superior to that usually reported. This could stem from continuing treatment to maximal response rather than an increase in intensity of therapy. These results are comparable to those reported with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) therapy by other investigators. The data suggest that intermittent C + P administered to maximal response continues to be the standard treatment approach for advanced CLL.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4851-4851
Author(s):  
David L. Grinblatt ◽  
Seema Bavisi ◽  
Jessica Lawton ◽  
Lynne S. Kaminer

Abstract Twenty two patients (pts) with primary or therapy-related MDS were treated with 5-azayctidine (AZA) at the Kellogg Cancer Care Centers (KCCC) from July 2004–May 2006. We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients with myelodysplastic syndrome treated at the KCCC who received this agent. Charts were reviewed for response, time to response, duration of response and rate of hospitalization with complications of therapy or disease during AZA therapy. Treated patients had Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts-type 1 (RAEB-1, n=6), RAEB type-2 (RAEB-2, n=3), Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMMoL, n=4) or Refractory anemia (RA, n=6). Median age at study entry was 80 yrs (range, 58–95). Patients were treated with azacytidine 75mg/m2 daily for seven consecutive days or five days followed by a two day break and an additional two days of treatment. Patients were treated until best response and treatment frequency was decreased to every 6–8 weeks once a response had occurred. Responses were as follows: Complete response (CR) with normalization of cytopenias, marrow dysplasia and blasts (as defined in IWG criteria by Cheson et al) occurred in 2 pts (9%). Complete hematologic response (CHR) meeting all of the peripheral blood criteria but without a confirmation bone marrow performed was noted in 4 pts (18%) while hematologic improvement (HE) major (>2 gm rise in Hgb) occurred in 1 pt (5%) and HE minor (1–2 gm rise in Hgb or 50% decrease in RBC requirements) occurred in 2 pts (9%). Thus, a response using the IWG criteria was seen in 9/22 pts yielding an overall response rate of 41%. The median time to response was 3 cycles (range, 1–4). The median duration of response was 8 months (range, 3–18+). Responses are ongoing in 4/9 of the responders. One of the complete response patients had a complex karyotype (5q-, 7q-, del (18p)) that was not present on follow-up marrow after response was noted. Though treatment related cytopenias did occur frequently in the first two cycles of therapy, there were no treatment related hospitalizations for neutropenic patients in this consecutive cohort of patients and no deaths due to therapy. Azacytidine is a well tolerated agent with responses occurring with a significant rate and duration in MDS.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4123-4123
Author(s):  
Yvonne Hsu ◽  
Rima M Saliba ◽  
Grace-Julia Okoroji ◽  
Susan o'Brien ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajoli ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4123 Background: Deletion 17p is the principal predictor of poor outcome in CLL pts after conventional chemotherapy. Several reports have shown better outcomes with NST. However, questions have risen as to the relevance of NST, in particular, to the extent that various selection biases lead to selection of only the “best” pts for this procedure. Purpose: Our primary goal is to update our NST experience with 17p-, and to report how often pts underwent transplantation and, within the limits of retrospective analysis, the reasons they did not. Methods: We reviewed NST outcomes for 17p- CLL pts transplanted between 2005 (when FISH became routinely performed at our institution) and 2010. Given the poor outcome after conventional FCR, a diligent effort started in 2007 by the Leukemia Service to refer pts to transplant sooner rather than later. Therefore, in a sub-analysis, we reviewed the number of 17p- CLL pts who were referred to Transplant Consult service since 2007 and assess the reasons for no transplant. Prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox's regression model. Multivariate analysis was not possible given sample size limitation. Results: A. Outcome of NST in 17p- CLL pts. Twenty-six pts were transplanted at our institution between 2005 and 2010. Median age (range) was 56 yrs (37–73). At NST, 15 pts (58%) had a β2m >3; 21/24 (87%) had stage Binet B/C; 4 pts (15%) had Richter's; 16/25 (64%) were FDG-avid; median prior chemotherapies (range) was 4(2–14), and 14 pts (54%) had refractory disease. 13 pts (50%) had complex cytogenetic abnormalities (in addition to 17p-). IgVH was unmutated in 11/12 (92%) pts tested, 14/15 (93%) were ZAP-70+. Prior to their transplantation, 24 pts (92%) were exposed to FCR, 11 (42%) to CFAR/OFAR, 7 (27%) to Hyper-CVAD, and 17 (65%) to alemtuzumab. With a median follow-up of 18 months (range, 3 – 60), the 2-year OS and PFS rates were 62% and 38%, respectively. On univariate analysis, determinants of outcomes included disease status, and β2m at NST, and year of transplant. All but one pt with chemosensitive disease had β2m >4 compared with 50% of pts with chemoresistant disease. Chemosensitivity was associated with significantly higher PFS (73% vs. 12%, p=0.02, Figure below) and a trend for higher OS (91% vs. 45%, p= 0.09). PFS was also significantly higher for transplants performed after 2007 (44% vs. 20%, p=0.03). β2m>4 was associated with lower 18 m OS (36% vs. 71%, p=0.05) in chemoresistant pts, but did not significantly impact PFS (38% vs. 14%, p=0.5). Two yrs follow-up was not reached for β2m >4 in this group. B. Transplant consults and transplantation rate : Between September 2007 and March 2010, 59 pts with 17p- CLL received a Transplant Service consult. Twenty of these 59 pts (34%) did receive their transplant at the time of this analysis, whereas 39 (66%) did not. Reasons for not receiving transplants included: 1) Death with salvage pre-transplant chemo (n=14, 36%); 2) Pt and/or physician became uninterested after achieving good response to salvage chemo (n=14, 36%); 3) lost follow-up after the initial consult (n=3, 8%); 4) age >75 (n=2, 5%); 5) insurance denial (n=3, 8%); 6) no donor (n=1, 2%); 7) other (n=2, 5%). Conclusions: NST is plausibly more effective in 17p- CLL pts when recipients have chemosensitive disease. If, as suggested by our analysis, at most 34% of pts receive this procedure, methods to extend the transplant's applicability are needed. Perhaps the most effective method would be to use NST as consolidation after initial response to conventional chemotherapy. Such a strategy would allow more pts to have chemosensitive disease at NST, and would decrease the death rate in heavily pre-treated pts during their pre-transplant cytoreductive therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Hematology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 368-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Stilgenbauer

Abstract Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is usually diagnosed in early stage, asymptomatic patients, and, although a wealth of prognostic parameters have been identified, the standard approach is a “watch and wait” strategy irrespective of risk factors. Therapy is only indicated if “active disease” criteria (International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia guidelines) are met, and the routine upfront treatment is a combination of CD20 antibody (rituximab, ofatumumab or obinutuzumab) and chemotherapy (fludarabine /cyclophosphamide, bendamustine, chlorambucil), with the choice mainly determined by physical fitness of the patient. The major subgroup in which this approach does not result into satisfactory efficacy is in CLL with 17p deletion (17p−) or TP53 mutation (TP53mut). Likewise, patients with a short initial response duration (i.e., <24-26 months) have a dismal outcome with chemoimmunotherapy salvage. Therefore, these patients have been referred to as “ultra high risk,” and, in these subgroups, novel agents such as signaling kinase inhibitors (also termed B-cell receptor signaling inhibitors; e.g., ibrutinib targeting Bruton tryosine kinase, idelalisib targeting phosphoinositide 3-kinase) and BCL2 antagonists (venetoclax, formerly ABT-199/GDC-0199) have shown dramatic efficacy. Ibrutinib and idelalisib are currently approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory CLL or frontline treatment of 17p−/TP53mut CLL regardless of fitness. Therefore, these agents are challenging the concept of adjusting treatment to fitness and TP53 status, because they offer remarkable efficacy combined with exceptional tolerability. Nevertheless, it appears that 17p−/TP53mut retains an adverse prognostic impact, making additional improvement a primary research goal aimed at the development of the best combinations and/or sequences of these new agents, as well as prognostic and predictive markers guiding their use.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 815-815
Author(s):  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Fangxin Hong ◽  
Christopher Peterson ◽  
Lode J. Swinnen ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: E4402 was a randomized phase III study comparing two different rituximab dosing strategies for patients with previously untreated, low tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL). The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure. The initial publication (Kahl, JCO 2014) demonstrated that a retreatment strategy utilized less drug and produced comparable time to treatment failure compared to a maintenance strategy. Here we provide long term follow up results, focusing on response duration, time to first cytotoxic therapy, overall survival, and risk of histologic transformation. METHODS: Eligible patients had untreated, low tumor burden (GELF criteria) FL. Patients received R 375 mg/m 2 weekly x 4 and responders were randomized to maintenance rituximab (MR) (single dose R q 3 months) or retreatment rituximab (RR) (R weekly x 4 doses at disease progression). Each strategy was continued until treatment failure. The primary endpoint, time to treatment failure, was defined as progression within 6 months of last R, no response to R retreatment, initiation of alternative therapy, or inability to complete protocol therapy. Secondary endpoints included time to first cytotoxic therapy, quality of life and safety. The ECOG Data Monitoring Committee recommended release of study results at a planned interim analysis in September 2011 and patients and providers were notified of results. Time to treatment failure data collection halted with release of the results but limited data collection on time to first cytotoxic therapy, response duration, and risk of histologic transformation continued. INITITIAL RESULTS: From 11/03 to 9/08, 384 patients with FL were enrolled. Complete or partial response was achieved in 289 patients (71%), who were then randomized to MR (n=146) or RR (n=143). Demographic features were similar in the two arms: median age 59 years; ECOG PS 0-1 in all patients, and FLIPI low-risk (14.9 vs. 16.4%), intermediate-risk (46.3 vs. 42.9%) and high-risk (38.8 vs. 40.7%) for MR vs. RR, respectively. At initial publication, with a median follow-up of 3.8 years, the time to treatment failure was 3.9 years for MR vs. 3.6 years for RR (p=NS). LONG TERM FOLLOW UP RESULTS: Immunoglobulin levels and risks for serious infections/late complications in MR patients will be updated at the annual meeting. For the endpoint of time to first cytotoxic therapy, the median follow up is 8.7 years. At 7 years, 83% of MR and 63% of RR remained free from first cytotoxic therapy (HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.50 - 3.76) [Figure 1]. For the endpoint of response duration, the median follow up is 12.1 years. At 10 years, 66% of the MR patients remained in their 1 st remission compared to 30% of the RR patients who remained in their 1 st remission [Figure 2]. The median response duration for RR patients receiving a single 4-week course of rituximab was 3.25 years. There was no difference in the overall survival at 10 years, 84% for MR vs. 83% for RR. There was a trend towards a lower risk of histologic transformation for patients receiving MR (n = 4) compared to RR (n = 11) (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: With long term follow up, the RESORT data indicates that in previously untreated, low tumor burden, follicular lymphoma, MR was superior to RR for delaying time to first cytotoxic therapy and for response duration, with a trend towards reducing the risk of histologic transformation. MR did not improve the overall survival. The original publication concluded that the time to treatment failure is similar between the two dosing strategies. Due to study design, time to treatment failure could not be analyzed in this long term follow up analysis. Compared to the historical benchmark of 3 years median time to first cytotoxic therapy when watch and wait is utilized, single agent rituximab, administered by either dosing strategy, was highly effective at delaying the time to first cytotoxic therapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Kahl: AbbVie, Adaptive, ADCT, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BeiGene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Genentech, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Kite, MEI, Pharmacyclics, Roche, TG Therapeutics, and Teva: Consultancy; AbbVie, Acerta, ADCT, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Genentech: Research Funding. Habermann: Incyte: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Tess Therapeutics: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Seagen: Other: Data Monitoring Committee; Morphosys: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Loxo Oncology: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Eli Lilly & Co.,: Other: Scientific Advisor. Schuster: Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; DTRM: Research Funding; Genetech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Juno Theraputics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pharmaclcyclics: Research Funding; Tessa Theraputics: Consultancy; TG Theraputics: Research Funding. Fenske: TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Servier Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; MorphoSys: Consultancy; Kite (Gilead): Speakers Bureau; KaryoPharm: Consultancy; CSL Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Speakers Bureau; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3960-3960
Author(s):  
Mark S. Kaminski ◽  
Andrew D. Zelenetz ◽  
Oliver W. Press ◽  
Mansoor N. Saleh ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3960 Introduction: The efficacy and safety of tositumomab and iodine I 131 tositumomab (TST/I-131-TST), the Bexxar® Therapeutic Regimen, were evaluated in 60 patients (pts) with chemotherapy-refractory low-grade (LG) or transformed B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) who had received at least 2 chemotherapy regimens and had either not responded to (72%) or had progressed within 6 months of their last regimen (28%) (J Clin Onc 2001; 19:3918 and Blood 2004; Abstract 2631). The primary efficacy endpoint was comparison of the number of pts who had a longer duration of response to TST/I-131-TST with the number of pts with a longer duration of response to their last qualifying chemotherapy (LQC). Thirty-nine (65%) pts, including 20% who attained a complete response (CR), responded to TST/I-131-TST, compared to 17 (28%) pts, including 3% CR, after their LQC (p<0.001). Seventy-four percent of pts had a longer response duration after TST/I-131TST compared to the LQC. Four pts developed myelodysplasia (MDS), and 5 pts developed human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA). We report final results of long term follow-up of these 60 pts. Patients and Methods: Pts were enrolled from 22 November 1996 to 06 March 1998. Pts alive at the last report date (1 March 2004) were followed for long-term safety and survival, and pts in remission at the last report date were followed for continued response. Results: Sixty pts received the dosimetric dose, and 58 of 60 pts received both the dosimetric and therapeutic doses of TST/I-131-TST. The median number of prior chemotherapies was 4 (range, 2–13). Fifty-nine of 60 (98%) pts had stage III/IV disease, 56% had bone marrow (BM) involvement, and 88% had ≥ two IPI risk factors at study entry. Thirty-six pts had LG B-NHL, 23 pts had a history of transformed B-NHL, and 1 pt had mantle cell NHL (MCL). Forty-eight (80%) pts have died, of whom 77% died due to lymphoma progression. Twelve pts were alive, and 6 pts were in CR at last follow-up. One pt withdrew consent for further follow-up but was in CR at 5.0 years, and the other 5 pts (4 LG, 1 transformed B-NHL) were in CR of ≥ 10 years' duration. The pts who continued in CR had received a median of 3 different prior chemotherapy regimens (range, 2–5), and no pts had received prior rituximab. For all 12 pts who attained CR, the median duration of response was 9.9 years (range, 0.7–11.7 years). Long-term toxicity included 7 pts who developed hypothyroidism. Secondary cancers included 1 lung adenocarincoma, 1 colon cancer, and 7 skin cancers which were reported previously. In addition, 1 developed a myeloproliferative disorder (MPD). No cases of MDS beyond the 4 previously reported were observed. Conclusion: A single course of TST/I-131-TST achieved durable remissions in chemotherapy-refractory LG and transformed B-NHL pts, with 5 of the 12 pts who achieved CR still in remission ≥ 10 years later. No additional cases of MDS were observed, but 1 pt developed a MPD since the last report. Thus, the final results of this study demonstrate that TST/I-131-TST is able to attain long-lasting durable CRs, with an acceptable toxicity profile, in a subset of pts with chemotherapy-refractory LG and transformed B-NHL. Disclosures: Kaminski: GlaxoSmithKline: Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Zelenetz:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Press:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Roche/Genentech: Honoraria. Saleh:GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Imcoline, Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Leonard:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Lister:GlaxoSmithKline: Chairman of Safety Monitoring Board for GSK. Horner:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Williams:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Employment. Vleisides:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Knox:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Wahl:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties; Nihon Medi Physics: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Naviscan PET systems: Consultancy; Threshold Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership. Vose:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document