Ten Year Follow up Analysis of the OSHO Phase III Trial (AML 96) Comparing Different Application Modes of AraC in Patients below 60 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): No Impact of AraCApplication Mode on Remission Rate, Toxicity, Disease-Free Survival or Overall Survival

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2966-2966
Author(s):  
Cornelia Becker ◽  
Rainer Krahl ◽  
Antje Schulze ◽  
Georg Maschmeyer ◽  
Christian Junghanß ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Clinical trials on different cytarabine doses for treatment of AML provide evidence of a dose response effect, but also for increase toxicity after high dose AraC (HDAC). Pharmacokinetic measurements of cytarabine-triphosphate (AraC-CTP), which is the most relevant cytotoxic metabolite of AraC, have revealed its formation in leukemic cells to be saturated with infusion rates above 250 mg/m2/h, this being significantly lower than used in HDAC schedules. Methods: Based on a pharmacological model and encouraging results of a phase II study we conducted a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial comparing the effects of two different application modes of AraC in patients up to 60 years with untreated newly diagnosed AML. Patients were randomized to receive AraC at two different infusion rates (IR) during induction and consolidation treatment: arm A/experimental: 1 × 2 g/m2/d AraC over 8 hours (IR 250 mg/m2/h) arm B/standard: 2 × 1 g/m2/d AraC over 3 hours (IR 333 mg/m2/h). Induction and first consolidation consisted of AraC (days 1, 3, 5, 7) in combination with an anthracycline (Idarubicine 12 mg/m2 or Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, days 1–3). The final dosage points (AraC day 7 and anthracycline day 3) were excluded from the second consolidation. The third consolidation consisted of either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation or of chemotherapy identical to second consolidation. Results: From 02/97 to 04/02 419 patients were enrolled in the study. The present analysis is based on 361 eligible and evaluable patients with a median follow up of 7 years. CR was reached in 249/361 (69%; 95%CI: 65%–74%) patients. No statistically significant differences were detected between arms A and B with regard to CR-rate (69% vs 69%) or early death rate (11% vs 8%). Hematological recovery of median white blood cell count (WBC) > 109/l and median platelets (plt) > 50 × 109/l revealed no difference between arms A and B after induction (WBC day 22 vs 22, p=0,68; plt day 25 vs 26, p=0,41) and consolidation (WBC day 28 vs 27, p=0,07; plt day 42 vs 40, p= 0,58). The event free survival (EFS) after 5 years is 0,25 ± 0,03 % for all patients with an overall survival of 0,31 ± 0,03 % after 5 years. For the purposes of analysis, the 83 transplant patients (23 allogeneic MRD, 14 allogeneic MUD and 46 autologous) were censored at time of transplant. No statistically significant difference between arms A and B in regard to EFS (0,25 ± 0,04 vs 0,25 ± 0,04, p=0,99), relapse incidence (0,63 ± 0,06 vs 0,60 ± 0,06, p=0,89), overall survival (0,32 ± 0,04 vs 0,30 ± 0,04, p=0,44) and therapy associated mortality (0,18 ± 0,04 vs 0,17 ± 0,03, p=0,95) were detectable after adjustment of prognostic factors. An analysis of risk factors by multivariate cox regression model confirmed cytogenetics at diagnosis to be the most important risk factor for CR rate (p<10−6) and for EFS (p<10−6). Other significant prognostic factors for EFS evaluated in the multivariate analysis were de novo vs secondary AML (p=0,0001), WBC (continuous) (p=0,001), LDH (>1–4 × vs other ULN) (p=0,008) and FAB classification (FAB M0,6,7 vs FAB M1,2,4,5) (p=0,0005). EFS after 5 years shows a significant correlation to cytogenetics (p<10−6) with 0,71±0,1, 0,27±0,05, 0,20±0,06 and 0,03±0,03 for favorable, normal, other and unfavorable cytogenetic karyotype, respectively. Conclusion: We conclude that the application of AraC at the presumptive saturating infusion rate of 250 mg/m2/h results in comparable remission rates, toxicity, event free survival and overall survival as compared to the standard IR with 333 mg/m2/h.

scholarly journals Evaluation of The Effectiveness and Side Effects of Radiotherapy in Patients With Primary Nervous System Lymphoma. A Single Center Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timur Koca ◽  
Aylin Fidan Korcum ◽  
Yasemin Şengün ◽  
Melek Gamze Aksu ◽  
Mine Genç
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Central Nervous System Lymphoma ◽  
Field Size ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

Aim: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the overall and progression-free survival, the radiotherapy process and the early and late adverse effects in patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) for primary nervous system lymphoma in our clinic.Method: Between January 2010 and September 2019, 16 patients who received radiotherapy due to primary central nervous system lymphoma in our clinic were examined according to their statistically significant differences in terms of survival and side effects.Results: The median disease-free survival of the patients was 6 months, and the median overall survival was 12.5 months. 18.75% of the patients could not receive chemotherapy but only radiotherapy. Radiotherapy doses were range from 2600 to 5000 cGy. When patients were evaluated in terms of radiotherapy dose, field size and chemotherapy, no statistically significant difference in overall survival was detected. Cognitive disorders were observed as the most common late side effects while the most common acute side effects in patients were headaches.Conclusion: In the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma, changes in radiotherapy portals and radiotherapy doses can be predicted in patients who received high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy or not. Furthermore, it has been considered that more comprehensive studies are needed to increase the success of treatment and provide standardization in treatment, especially in patients with elderly and comorbid diseases.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-grade soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1491-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
A E Chang ◽  
T Kinsella ◽  
E Glatstein ◽  
A R Baker ◽  
W F Sindelar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
High Dose Regimen ◽  
Disease Free

We have previously reported the results of a randomized trial that demonstrated the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with high-grade extremity sarcomas compared with no chemotherapy. This regimen included doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate. This report updates and extends our experience. The median follow-up of this trial is now 7.1 years and reveals a 5-year disease-free survival of 75% and 54% for chemotherapy and no chemotherapy groups, respectively (two-sided P [P2] = .037). The 5-year overall survival for patients in this trial was 83% and 60% for the chemotherapy and no chemotherapy groups, respectively, with a trend towards improved survival in the chemotherapy arm (P2 = .124). Because of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy we performed a subsequent randomized trial comparing this high-dose regimen to reduced cumulative doses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide without methotrexate. Eighty-eight patients were entered into this trial which has a median follow-up of 4.4 years. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival for patients treated with the reduced doses of chemotherapy was 72% and 75%, respectively, and was not significantly different from the high-dose regimen. No patients developed congestive heart failure on this study. We conclude that adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free survival in patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcomas. The overall survival advantage in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in our initial randomized high-dose chemotherapy trial has diminished though it continues to favor the chemotherapy group. A reduced-dose chemotherapy regimen was found to be comparable to the high-dose regimen.

Outcomes in CCG-2961, a Children’s Cancer Group Phase III Trial for Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 169-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beverly J. Lange ◽  
Franklin O. Smith ◽  
Patricia A. Dinndorf ◽  
Carola A.S. Arndt ◽  
Dorothy R. Barnard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Remission Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Group ◽  
De Novo Aml

Abstract CCG-2961 tested an intensively timed induction therapy consisting of cytarabine (AC), etoposide, thioguanine, dexamethasone, idarubicin and daunorubicin. Patients in remission after induction were randomized to a second induction course (Arm A) or a 3-drug combination of fludarabine, AC, and idarubicin (Arm B). Course 3 for patients with related donors was bone marrow transplantation (BMT); for those without donors, high dose AC/l-asparaginase. After Course 3 patients without donors were randomized to 14 infusions of Interleukin 2 (IL2) over 18 days or follow-up. CNS prophylaxis was intrathecal AC. Eligibility included all subtypes of de novo AML except acute promyelocytic leukemia and AML in patients with Down syndrome. CCG-2961 opened in Oct.1996 and closed in Dec. 2002. The DSMC suspended the study between Oct. 1999 and May 2000 while the 2961 Committee developed supportive care policies to reduce treatment-related mortality (TRM). CCG-2961 enrolled 900 de novo patients aged 3 days to 21 years, with 495 and 405 patients accruing pre-and post suspension respectively. Remission induction rate is 88.5%. With median follow-up of 3.6 years (range: 0 – 8.1 years), event-free survival (EFS) at 3 years is 44±3% and survival (OS) 57±3%. Disease-free survival (DFS) following Course 2 Arms A and B are not different, although relapse is significantly higher in Arm A (7.3% .vs. 3.1% P=0.018) and TRM more common in Arm B (7.9% vs.4.2% P=0.059), despite 7 less days of neutropenia in Arm B (P<0.001). DFS is 65±9% for patients with a donor versus 50±5% for patients without a donor (P=0.005); respective OS, 74±8% and 66±5% (P=0.221). However, among 98 patients in CR1 with t(8;21) or inv(16) cytogenetics, outcomes in those without and with a donor were no different: DFS (61±12% vs. 72±18%, P = 0.49) and OS (78±10% vs. 77±17%, l P= 0.85). DFS with and without IL2 is 55±9% and 60±8%(P=0.606). Outcomes improved progressively over time. EFS pre- and post-suspension are 41±4% and 47±5%(P=0.038); OS, 52±5% and 63±5%(P=0.005); TRM is 17±3% pre- and 12±3% post-suspension (P=0.039). Factors predictive of inferior EFS are age >17 years, Afro-American and Hispanic ethnicity, body mass index <10th or >95th percentile for age, absence of related marrow donor, WBC > 50,000/mm3, karyotype with −7/7q, −5/5q- or > cytogenetic 5 abnormalities, FLT3/ITD, >15 % morphologic blasts on day 14 or >0.5% immunologically detectable blasts at the end of induction. CCG-2961 confirms the efficacy and high TRM of intensively timed therapy. Neither fludarabine nor IL2 increases DFS or OS, and availability of a donor does not improve outcomes in those with favorable cytogenetics.

Randomized trial of high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haematopoietic stem cell support vs. standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: Overall survival after 6 years of follow up

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 672-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Zander ◽  
N. Kroeger ◽  
C. Schmoor ◽  
W. Krueger ◽  
V. Moebus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Interactive Effect ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade Iii

672 Background: Investigation of high dose chemotherapy (HD-CT) supported by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared with standard dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) as adjuvant treatment in patients with primary breast cancer and 10 or more axillary lymph nodes. Methods: Between November 1993 and September 2000 307 patients were randomized to receive the following cycles of Epirubicin (90 mg/m2), Cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) intervenously (every 21 days) either HD-CT of Cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m2), Thiotepa (150 mg/m2) and Mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2) intervenously for 4 consecutive days followed by stem cell transplantation or standard dose chemotherapy SDCT in 3 cycles of Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2), Methotrexate (40 mg/m2) and Fluoruracil (600 mg/m2) intervenously on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. The primary end points were event-free survival and overall survival. Results: After a median follow-up of 6.1 years 166 events with respect to event-free survival (SD-CT: 91, HD-CT: 75) and 123 with respect to overall survival (SD-CT: 66 and HD-CT: 57) have been observed. The hazard ratio of HD-CT versus SD-CT is estimated as 0,80, p = 0,15. The hazard ratio for overall survival for high dose chemotherapy versus standard dose chemotherapy is estimated as 0,84, p = 0,33. Analysing the effect of treatment on event-free survival premenopausal patients, patients with tumor grade III and ER-positive patients had a better outcome with HD-CT with an interactive effect of 2.5 and 1.4. The significance was only shown in grade III patients in favour of HD-CT, (p = 0,049). The interactive effect of HD-CT with prognostic factors did not reach significance for overall survival. Conclusion: Even with a follow-up of 6.1 years there was only a trend in favour of high dose chemotherapy with respect to overall survival but without a statistical significance. A proper meta-analysis needs to be undertaken for an evaluation of subgroups of patients which might benefit from this treatment approach. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Long-term results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11: A phase III trial to preserve the larynx—Induction cisplatin/5-FU and radiation therapy versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy versus radiation therapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5517-5517 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Forastiere ◽  
M. Maor ◽  
R. S. Weber ◽  
T. Pajak ◽  
B. Glisson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lower Death Rate

5517 Background: The 2-year results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11 were published in 2003 (NEJM 349:2091–8,2003). We now present the 5-year results (after median follow-up for surviving patients of 6.9 years) of 515 eligible pts with resectable stage III or IV (excluding T1 and high volume T4), cancer of the glottic or supraglottic larynx. Methods: Patients were randomized to induction cisplatin/5-FU (CF) with responders then receiving RT (I+RT) (n = 173); or concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 q 21 days × 3) and RT (CRT) (n = 171); or RT alone (R) (n = 171). Laryngectomy was performed for < partial response to induction CF, for persistent/recurrent disease or for laryngeal dysfunction. Results: At 5 years, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (44.6%, p = 0.011) or CRT (46.6%, p = 0.011) compared to R (33.9%). There was no difference in LFS between I+RT and CRT (p = 0.98). Laryngeal preservation (LP) was significantly better with CRT (83.6%) compared to I+RT (70.5%, p = 0.0029) or R (65.7%, p = 0.00017). Local-regional control (LRC) was significantly better with CRT (68.8%) compared to I+RT (54.9%, p = 0.0018) or R (51%, p = 0.0005). I+RT compared to R for LP and LRC showed no significant difference (p = 0.37 and 0.62, respectively). The distant metastatic rate was low (I+RT 14.3%, CRT 13.2%, R 22.3%) with a trend (p ∼0.06) for benefit from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (38.6%, p = 0.016) or CRT (39%, p = 0.0058) compared to R (27.3%). Overall survival rates were similar for the first 5 years (I+RT 59.2%, CRT 54.6%, R 53.5%); thereafter I+RT had a non-significant lower death rate. Compared to CRT, significantly more pts in the R group died of their cancer (34% vs 58.3%, p = 0.0007); the rate for I+RT was 43.8%. Conclusion: These 5-year results differ from the 2-year analysis by a significant improvement in LFS now seen for both I+RT and CRT treatments compared to R. For the endpoints of LP and LRC, CRT is still the superior treatment with no advantage seen to the addition of induction CF to R. There is no significant difference in overall survival. [Table: see text]

Phase III study of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel given every 3 weeks or weekly in operable breast cancer: Results of Intergroup Trial E1199

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 516-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Sparano ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
S. Martino ◽  
V. Jones ◽  
E. Perez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

516 Background: Evidence suggests that docetaxel is more effective than paclitaxel, and paclitaxel is more effective when given weekly than every 3 weeks in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Methods: Eligibility included axillary lymph node positive or high-risk (tumor at least 2 cm) node-negative BC. All patients received 4 cycles of AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) every 3 weeks, followed by either: (1) paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (P3), (2) paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (P1), (3) docetaxel 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks × 4 (D3), or (4) docetaxel 35 mg/m2 weekly × 12 (D1). The primary comparisons included taxane (P vs. D) and schedule (every 3 weeks vs. weekly), and secondary comparisons included P3 vs. other arms. The trial had 86% power to detect a 17.5% decrease in disease-free survival (DFS) for either primary comparison, and 80% power to detect a 22% decrease for the secondary comparisons (2-sided nomimal 5% level tests corrected for multiple comparisons). Results: A total of 4,950 eligible patients were accrued. There was no difference in the primary comparisons afer 856 DFS events and 483 deaths after a median follow-up of 46.5 months at the 4th interim analysis ( www.sabcs.org , abstract 48). This is the final pre-specified analysis for the primary comparisons after 1,042 DFS events and 650 deaths (with 1,020 DFS events at this time, to be updated at the meeting). After a median followup of 60.2 months, there remains no significant difference in the hazard ratio (HR) for the taxane (1.02; p=0.73) or schedule (1.07; p=0.30) (as in the first analysis). In secondary comparisons of the standard arm (P3) with the other arms (HR > 1 favoring the experimental arms), the HRs were 1.30 (p = 0.003) for arm P1, 1.24 (p=0.02) for arm D3, and 1.09 (p=0.33) for arm D1. Analysis of interaction by hormone-receptor status will be presented. The incidence of worst grade toxicity (grade 3/4) was 24%/6% for arm P3, 24%/3% for arm P1, 21%/50% for arm D3, and 38%/6% for arm D1. Conclusions: There were no differences in DFS when comparing taxane or schedule overall. DFS was significantly improved in the weekly paclitaxel and every 3-week docetaxel arms compared with the every 3-week paclitaxel arm. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 15-year Follow-up of Comparing Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Multicentres, Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyu Luo ◽  
Guang Cao ◽  
wenbin Guo ◽  
Jie Yang ◽  
Qiuru Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Backgroud: Longer follow-up was necessary to testify the exact value of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND).Methods：From January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2005,1027 patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to two groups: MALND and CALND. 996 eligible patients were enrolled. The end points are disease free survival and overall survival.Results：The final cohort of 996 patients was followed for an average of 184 months. The distribution of all events was fairly similar between two groups of patients. The incidence of local in-breast events did not differ in a significant manner between two cohorts. Similarly, the rate of distant metastases was not significantly different with 30.0% in MLND and 32.6% in CALND. And no significant difference was observed in other primary tumor between two groups (p=0.46). Patients who remain alive with no event comprise a total of 37.2% in MALND and 35.4% in CALND. Other primary cancers and deaths from other causes were distributed equally between two groups. The 15-year disease-free survival rates were41.1 percent for the MALND group and 39.6 percent for the CALND group (p=0.79). MALND was found to be not inferior for overall survival (P =0.54). The 15-year overall survival rates were 49.5 percentafter MALND and 51.2 percentafter CALND (p=0.86). Probability of overall survival was not significantly different between two groups.Conclusions：MALND does not increase unfavorable events, and also does not affect the long-term survival of patients. Therefore, MALND should be one of the preferred approaches for breast cancer surgery.

Timing of Second Autologous Transplantations in Multiple Myeloma: Results of a Multicenter Sequential Randomized Clinical Trial.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 59-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abderrahman Abdelkefi ◽  
Saloua Ladeb ◽  
Tarek Ben Othman ◽  
Lamia Torjman ◽  
Amel Lakhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Log Rank Test

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is now considered standard therapy in young patients (<65 years) with multiple myeloma (MM). The Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome conducted a randomized trial of the treatment of MM with high-dose chemotherapy followed by either one or two successive ASCTs. The probabilities of event-free-survival and overall survival were doubled with a double transplant. However, no randomized trial has compared tandem transplant up-front with a strategy including planned second ASCT at relapse or progression. Therefore, we performed a multicenter, sequential, randomized trial designed to assess the optimal timing of a second ASCT. Methods: From May 2003 to April 2006, 140 patients with symptomatic MM (de novo) and less than 60 years of age, were randomly assigned to receive either tandem transplantation up-front (within 6 months of the first transplantation) [Arm A, n=69] or one ASCT followed by a consolidation therapy with thalidomide (day +90, 100 mg/per day during 5 months) [Arm B, n=71]. Patients included in the arm B received a second transplant in case of disease progression on consolidation therapy, or in case of relapse in responders. Clinical characteristics of each group were similar. In both arms of the study, ASCT was preceded by first-line therapy with thalidomide-dexamethasone and subsequent collection of peripheral blood stem cells with high-dose cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and G-CSF. Data were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months (range: 6–34), the 2-year overall survival was 55% in the arm A and 75% in the arm B. Survival curves were not different (P=0.28, log-rank test). The 2-year event-free survival was 41% in the arm A and 60% in the arm B (P=0.4, log-rank-test). In the arm B, relapse-free survival of ≥ 16 months following the first transplantation was an important predictor of overall survival (p< 0.001). Conclusion: Data from the present study suggest that up-front single ASCT followed by a consolidation therapy with thalidomide and a second ASCT after relapse or progression is a safe and effective global strategy to treat MM patients. Longer follow-up is needed before definite conclusions can be given concerning the optimal timing of second autologous transplantations in patients with MM.

Results of the ECOG E1900 Trial in Younger Adults with AML Using an Event Free Survival Endpoint Are Concordant with Results Based on Overall Survival: Potential for a Surrogate Endpoint to Facilitate Rapid Approval of Therapies in AML

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2599-2599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Hugo F. Fernandez ◽  
Hillard M. Lazarus ◽  
Jacob M. Rowe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Npm1 Mutation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Novel therapies are required to improve the outcome of patients with AML. New agents are asked to demonstrate an overall survival (OS) benefit before qualifying for FDA approval. The long duration of clinical trials required in order to achieve this endpoint hampers quick evaluation of candidate therapies, including novel agents. Identification of reliable surrogate endpoints for OS in AML is needed. Here we compare the results of therapy for patients with untreated AML ages 16-60 years on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1900 trial (E1900) of induction chemotherapy followed by consolidation and autologous transplant in order to evaluate the validity of an event free survival (EFS) endpoint as a surrogate for OS. Methods:OS was measured from randomization for induction therapy to death from any cause (censored at last contact). EFS was measured from randomization to induction treatment failure, relapse after compete response (CR), or death in remission (censored at last contact). Hazard ratios (HR) were computed using Cox proportional hazards models. The association between EFS and OS was evaluated using the Kendall tau-a rank correlation for censored data. Results:There were657 patients enrolled of which 426 patients relapsed or had induction treatment failure before death or date of last contact. Median EFS and OS were 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 9.7 months) and 23.6 months (95% CI, 16.9 to 23.6 months), respectively. With a median follow-up of 80.1 months, there is a statistically significant correlation between EFS and OS (Kendall tau-a = 0.467, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (0.425, 0.510), p<0.001). This correlation was similarly significant at a median follow-up of 25.2 months (Kendall tau-a = 0.361, 95% CI (0.323, 0.400), p <0.001) when the E1900 trial was originally reported (Fernandez et al. NEJM 2009). Key findings reported based on the original OS endpoint are similar when analyzed with an EFS endpoint (Table 1). High-dose daunorubicin (90 mg/m2) (DNR 90) confers both an EFS and OS benefit in patients aged < 50 years and patients with intermediate cytogenetic risk, and does not confer an EFS or OS benefit in older patients and patients with unfavorable cytogenetic risk, on univariate analysis. Divergent results are only seen in the small subset of favorable cytogenetic risk patients, where DNR 90 conferred an OS benefit (p=0.027) without an EFS benefit (p=0.32). Both EFS and OS endpoints consistently reflect the impact of mutation status on survival. The presence of a FLT3-ITD or DNMT3A mutation has a negative impact on both EFS and OS while an IDH2 mutation has a favorable impact on EFS and OS. The presence of a NPM1 mutation confers a favorable impact on EFS and OS in patients who received DNR 90 and did not impact EFS or OS in patients receiving standard-dose daunorubicin (45 mg/m2) (DNR 45). The presence of an IDH1 mutation does not impact EFS or OS. Conclusions:The results of E1900 demonstrating superiority of DNR 90 in AML induction in patients up to age 60 are concordant when using an EFS or OS endpoint. This is true for the group as a whole as well as for subgroups for which targeted agents are in development (FLT3/IDH2 inhibitors). Further investigation of whether EFS is a reliable surrogate for OS is warranted in AML. If confirmed, its use as a primary endpoint could be adopted by regulatory agencies in order to allow more rapid completion of clinical trials in AML and bring new therapies to AML patients in a timely fashion. Table 1. Results of E1900 based on an EFS endpoint versus an OS endpoint. Subgroup N OS HR (DNR 90/DNR 45) & 95% CI Wald P EFS HR (DNR 90/DNR 45) & 95% CI Wald P DNR 45 DNR 90 Age < 50 yrs ³ 50 yrs 188 142 172 155 0.66 (0.50, 0.85) 0.81 (0.62, 1.06) 0.002 0.118 0.64 (0.50, 0.82) 0.86 (0.67, 1.10) 0.0004 0.23 Cytogenetic Favorable Intermediate Unfavorable 38 141 59 51 127 63 0.51 (0.28, 0.93) 0.68 (0.50, 0.92) 0.79 (0.54, 1.16) 0.027 0.012 0.225 0.76 (0.44, 1.31) 0.63 (0.47, 0.83) 0.72 (0.49, 1.05) 0.32 0.001 0.09 Subgroup N OS HR (MUT/WT) & 95% CI Wald P EFS HR (MUT/WT) & 95% CI Wald P FLT3-ITD WT MUT 456 147 1.62 (1.31, 2.01) <.0001 1.48 (1.21, 1.82) 0.0002 DNMT3A WT MUT 371 119 1.30 (1.03, 1.65) 0.03 1.23 (0.98, 1.54) 0.07 IDH1 WT MUT 465 36 0.88 (0.59, 1.33) 0.55 0.91 (0.62, 1.34) 0.64 IDH2 WT MUT 451 50 0.63 (0.43, 0.93) 0.02 0.68 (0.48, 0.97) 0.03 NPM1 DNR 45 DNR 90 245 257 0.84 (0.61, 1.16) 0.60 (0.41, 0.89) 0.30 0.01 0.90 (0.66, 1.22) 0.59 (0.41, 0.84) 0.49 0.004 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document