Pomalidomide (CC4047) Plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone (Pom/dex) Is Highly Effective Therapy in Relapsed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 866-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha Q. Lacy ◽  
Suzanne R. Hayman ◽  
Morie A. Gertz ◽  
Jacob B. Allred ◽  
Sumithra J. Mandrekar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Thalidomide and its analogue lenalidomide have high response rates among patients with newly diagnosed as well as previously treated myeloma. Pomalidomide (CC4047) is the newest immunomodulatory (IMiD) agent that has shown single-agent activity in phase I studies. We report on the first Phase 2 trial of pomalidomide combined with low dose dexamethasone (Pom/dex) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: 37 patients (21 male and 16 female) were enrolled. Pomalidomide was given orally 2 mg daily on days 1–28 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone was given orally at a dose of 40 mg daily on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each cycle. Response was assessed by the International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. All patients received aspirin 325 mg daily as prophylaxis against DVT. Results: The median age was 66 years (range, 40 – 88). All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity, and all analysis were done on intent to treat basis. All patients had received prior therapy; 38% had 3 prior regimens; 35% had 2 prior regimens and 27% had one prior regimen. 76% had previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and 24% had 2 prior ASCT. 62% had previous IMiD therapy. Toxicity was mild and consisted primarily of myelosuppression. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 31%; grade 3 thrombocytopenia 3%; grade 3 anemia 3 %. Other grade 3/4 toxicities seen in less than 5% pts included: diarrhea, atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, dehydration and renal insufficiency. 16 % had grade 1/2 neuropathy. No grade 3 neuropathy was seen and there have been no thromboembolic events. Thirty (81%) patients are continuing study treatment. Seven patients have discontinued treatment due to: disease progression (5), died on study (1) and the medical doctor’s discretion (1). Twenty three of 37 patients (62%) achieved an objective response to therapy; including 9 (24%) with VGPR; 14 patients (38%) with PR; 6 (16%) with stable disease. Objective responses were seen in 4 of 13 patients (29%) who were refractory to lenalidomide. Conclusions: Pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Pom/dex) is highly active and well tolerated for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with an objective responserate of 62%, including a 29% response rate among patients who are lenalidomiderefractory.

A Multicenter Phase II Study of Perifosine (KRX-0401) Alone and in Combination with Dexamethasone (Dex) for Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3582-3582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
S. Lonial ◽  
A. Jakubowiak ◽  
J. Wolf ◽  
A. Krishnan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Gene Array ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Perifosine is an oral, novel synthetic alkylphospholipid, with multiple effects on signal transduction pathways, including inhibition of Akt and activation of JNK. Preclinical in vitro studies showed that perifosine induces significant cytotoxicity in both multiple myeloma(MM) cell lines and patient MM cells resistant to conventional therapies, and augments dexamethasone(dex), doxorubicin, melphalan and bortezomib-induced MM cell cytotoxicity. In vivo studies showed significant antitumor activity in a human plasmacytoma mouse model. PhaseI studies in solid tumors have shown that perifosine is well tolerated at a dose of up to150mg daily, with responses also seen. We report preliminary results of a PhaseII trial of perifosine, alone and in combination with dex, in patients(pts) with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM. Pts received 150mg of perifosine daily for a 21-day(d) cycle, and were assessed by serum and/or urine electrophoresis. Eligible pts had relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM with measurable disease. Pts were permitted bisphosphonate treatment. Concomitant steroids(prednisone>10 mg/d), serum creatinine of >3.0 mg/dL, and hemoglobin<8.0g/dL within 14 d of enrollment were exclusion criteria. Progressing pts, documented on 2 occasions at least one week apart, had dex 20 mg twice per week added to perifosine. Toxicities were assessed by NCI-CTCAE, v3.0. 40 pts (22 men and 18 women, median age 61 y, range 38–78) have been treated to date. All had relapsed/refractory MM, with a median of 4 lines of prior treatment (range 1–9). Prior therapy included dex(100%), thalidomide(100%), bortezomib(73%), lenalidomide(28%) and stem cell transplant(73%). Among 25 pts currently evaluable for response, best response(EBMT criteria) to single agent perifosine after≥2 cycles was stable disease(<25% reduction in M-protein) in 6 pts(24%). Dex was added in 15 of 25 pts with PD, with 9 pts evaluable for response on the combination: 3 pts(33%) achieved MR and 2(22%) pts achieved SD. The most common adverse events included nausea (45%, 3% grade 3); vomiting (40%); diarrhea(40%); fatigue(24%, 3% grade 3), and increased creatinine(55%, 11% grade 3/4 in the context of PD and light chain nephropathy). 2 pts had G3 neutropenia which resolved. Dose reduction(150 to 100 mgs/d) was required in 11 pts and 4 pts discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Attributable toxicities otherwise proved manageable with appropriate supportive care and perifosine was generally well tolerated, with no peripheral neuropathy or DVT seen. Perifosine as monotherapy and in combination with dex has activity in pts with advanced, relapsed/refractory MM, achieving MR and/or stabilization of disease in 55% of evaluable pts to date. It was generally well tolerated, although caution in pts with renal dysfunction is warranted. PK, IHC and gene array studies are ongoing. Future studies evaluate perifosine at other dosing schedules and in combination with other agents including bortezomib.

Safety and efficacy of single-agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 772-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Mohamad Hussein ◽  
James Berenson ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, toxicities from dexamethasone can be dose limiting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Patients (N = 222) received lenalidomide 30 mg/day once daily (days 1-21 every 28 days) until disease progression or intolerance. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and safety were assessed. Overall, 67% of patients had received 3 or more prior treatment regimens. Partial response or better was reported in 26% of patients, with minimal response 18%. There was no difference between patients who had received 2 or fewer versus 3 or more prior treatment regimens (45% vs 44%, respectively). Median values for TTP, PFS, and OS were 5.2, 4.9, and 23.2 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (39%), and anemia (20%), which proved manageable with dose reduction. Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 4% of patients. Lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed and refractory MM with acceptable toxicities. These data support treatment with single-agent lenalidomide, as well as its use in steroid-sparing combination approaches. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00065351.

Phase I Study of 30-Minute Infusion of Carfilzomib As Single Agent or in Combination With Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 732-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyriakos P. Papadopoulos ◽  
David S. Siegel ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Peter Lee ◽  
Steven T. Rosen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Plasma Concentration ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Irreversible Inhibitor ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Purpose Carfilzomib is an irreversible inhibitor of the constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome. This phase I study evaluated the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of carfilzomib administered as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion. Safety and efficacy of carfilzomib as a single agent or in combination with low-dose dexamethasone were assessed. Patients and Methods Patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) were administered single-agent carfilzomib on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. Cycle one day 1 and 2 doses were 20 mg/m2, followed thereafter by dose escalation to 36, 45, 56, or 70 mg/m2. Additionally, carfilzomib was combined with low-dose dexamethasone (40 mg/wk). Results Thirty-three patients were treated with single-agent carfilzomib. Dose-limiting toxicities in two patients at 70 mg/m2 were renal tubular necrosis and proteinuria (both grade 3). The MTD was 56 mg/m2. Nausea (51.5%), fatigue (51.5%), pyrexia (42.4%), and dyspnea and thrombocytopenia (each 39.4%) were the most common treatment-related toxicities. Overall response rate (ORR) was 50% (56-mg/m2 cohort). Increasing carfilzomib dosing from 20 to 56 mg/m2 resulted in higher area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to last sampling and maximum plasma concentration exposure with short half-life (range, 0.837 to 1.21 hours) and dose-dependent inhibition of proteasome chymotrypsin-like activity. In 22 patients treated with 45 or 56 mg/m2 of carfilzomib plus low-dose dexamethasone, the ORR was 55% with a safety profile comparable to that of single-agent carfilzomib. Conclusion Carfilzomib administered as a 30-minute IV infusion at 56 mg/m2 (as single agent or with low-dose dexamethasone) was generally well tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. These data have provided the basis for the phase III randomized, multicenter trial ENDEAVOR.

scholarly journals Daratumumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DPd) for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5642-5642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al-Ola Abdallah ◽  
Neil Dunavin ◽  
Brian McClune ◽  
Leyla Shune ◽  
Ajoy L. Dias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitor ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Response

Abstract Background: Daratumumab triplet regimens containing dexamethasone and lenalidomide or bortezomib are an effective treatment option for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Daratumumab was recently FDA-approved in combination with the second-generation immunomodulatory drug, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone based (DPd) on results of the EQUULEUS study where overall response rates (ORR) of 60% were seen. The goal of this retrospective study was to analyze clinical outcomes of the DPd triplet regimen in either a daratumumab and pomalidomide naïve or refractory population of heavily pretreated RRMM patients at our institution. Methods: Thirty-two patients with RRMM treated with DPd at the University of Kansas Health System between November 2015 and July 2018 were included in our analysis. DPd consisted of 28-day cycles of daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously (weekly for cycles 1 and 2, every 2 weeks for cycles 3-6, and every 4 weeks thereafter until disease progression); pomalidomide 4 mg orally (PO)on Days 1-21 and adjusted for cytopenia or toxicities; and dexamethasone 40 mg PO weekly adjusted based on tolerance. based on age. Responses were evaluated using IMWG criteria. Patient characteristics, disease course, and outcomes were summarized with descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results:The median age was 64 years (range 44-83). Twenty-three patients (72%) had IgG isotype, 11 patients (34 %) had ISS stage III disease at diagnosis, 13 patients (41%) had high risk cytogenetics, and 13 patients (41%) had extramedullary disease. Median number of previous lines of therapy was 4 (1-9). Twenty-two patients (69%) received ≥3 prior therapies. Twenty-three patients (72%) were proteasome inhibitor refractory, 28 patients (88%) were immunomodulator refractory, 9 patients (28%) were daratumumab refractory, and 3 patients (15%) were double refractory to daratumumab and pomalidomide. Twenty-eight patients (88%) had received autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) prior to DPd; 12 patients (38%) had ≥2 prior transplants. Median number of DPd cycles received was 6 (2-30) and the median duration of treatment was 5 months (2-30). At a median follow-up of 8.4 months (range: 2-29), the overall response rate (ORR) for all patients was 72% which compares favorably to the ORR of 60% in the EQUULEUS study. However, about half of the responses were partial responses (PR) (47%). The ORR rate for those who were refractory to either pomalidomide or daratumumab was 65%. The PFS was 8.3 months, while the median OS was not reached. Conclusion: DPd was recently approved for the treatment of RRMM. Our ORR compares favorably to the EQUULEUS study, however about half of responses were partial responses or better. Surprisingly, our analysis shows an impressive ORR in patients with previous exposure to proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory therapies in RRMM population, suggesting a benefit of DPd even in patients who received prior pomalidomide or daratumumab. Disclosures McGuirk: Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Other: speaker, Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: travel accommodations, expenses, speaker ; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ganguly:Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau.

Second Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) as Salvage Therapy for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1170-1170
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Olin ◽  
David L. Porter ◽  
Selina M. Luger ◽  
Stephen J. Schuster ◽  
Donald Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) as part of initial therapy has been shown to prolong survival of patients with multiple myeloma, with some achieving durable complete remission. However, the majority of patients ultimately relapse after ASCT and require salvage treatment. Options for the treatment of such patients have increased significantly over recent years, including not only novel chemotherapeutic and biological agents but also additional ASCTs. We performed a retrospective analysis of our experience with salvage ASCT for multiple myeloma to determine which clinical variables influence outcome. Methods: Between October 1992 and February 2005, we performed 342 ASCTs for multiple myeloma. Twenty-six of these were salvage transplants for relapsed disease after prior ASCT, and all were included in the analysis. Patients who received two planned (tandem) ASCTs were not included. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 47 (range 25–66), and median ISS and DS stages at diagnosis were 1 and 2, respectively. The initial ASCT was melphalan-based in 21/26; six (23%) achieved a complete response (CR) to the initial transplant, and fifteen (58%) achieved a partial response (PR). The median event-free survival (EFS) after the initial transplant was 19.5 months (range 2–60). The median time between initial and salvage ASCT was 2.6 years (range 0.3–7.6). Twenty-two patients (85%) received non-transplant therapy between ASCTs, and the median number of lines of therapy prior to salvage ASCT was 3. At the time of salvage ASCT, the median age was 52.5 (range 28–69). Fourteen patients received melphalan alone, eight received melphalan/TBI, and four received other regimens. Eleven patients (42%) achieved a response to therapy (1 CR, 10 PR). One patient (4%) died of transplant-related toxicity. The median follow-up after salvage ASCT is 12 months (range 0.2–58). Median EFS is 9 months, and median overall survival (OS) is 36 months. The 2-year EFS is 14%, and 2-year OS is 52%. On univariate analysis, both response to and EFS after initial transplant significantly predict improved EFS after salvage transplant (p=0.0008 and p=0.0065 respectively). Both also predict improved OS (p=0.03 and 0.0005 respectively). A greater than 12 month interval between first and second transplant also correlated with OS (p=0.04). There was no significant difference in EFS or OS by preparative regimen. Interestingly, type of response to the salvage transplant (CR/PR or less than PR) did not predict improved EFS or OS. Conclusion: This study suggests that salvage ASCT after relapse from initial ASCT is a feasible therapy for patients with heavily treated multiple myeloma, particularly those with a prolonged response to the first transplant.

Expanded Access Program (EAP) for Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) Plus Dexamethasone in over 1400 Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3556-3556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Chen ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
David Siegel ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Ralph Vincent Boccia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Advocacy Groups ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Expanded Access ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Expanded Access Program ◽  
The Us ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Access Program

Abstract Background: Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) in combination with dexamethasone was approved in the US on June 29, 2006 for the treatment of subjects with multiple myeloma who had received at least one prior therapy. On February 28, 2005 based upon a positive interim analysis of two pivotal placebo-controlled Phase III studies, an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended the studies be unblinded and all subjects in both studies be given access to lenalidomide. In April 2005, the FDA in association with myeloma patient advocacy groups requested Celgene establish an expanded access program to make lenalidomide plus dexamethasone available to subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma while the treatment was awaiting approval. Aim: To provide lenalidomide to multiple myeloma subjects with a high likelihood of benefit and to obtain additional safety data. Methods: Subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that received at least 1 prior therapy were eligible. Subjects received 25 mg lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone in 4-week cycles until disease progression was documented, study drug was discontinued, or lenalidomide became commercially available for this indication. Results: Between September 8, 2005 and July 25, 2006, approximately 1400 subjects in the US and Canada were enrolled into the study. A data snapshot taken March 17, 2006 demonstrated that 746 subjects had been enrolled, median age was 63 years, 60% were male, and 66.5% had Stage III disease. Median time on study was 7.1 weeks (0.1–24.4) and median daily dose was 20.5 mg. At least one Grade 3 or 4 adverse event was reported in 261 (35%) of the 746 subjects. Most commonly reported Grade 3–4 events were neutropenia (7.9% of subjects), thrombocytopenia (6.0%), fatigue (3.6%), anemia (3.5%), pneumonia (3.1%) and hyperglycemia (2.0%). These most commonly reported Grade 3–4 adverse events were the same as those found in the previous pivotal studies, however, their frequencies of occurrence were lower in the current study probably due to ongoing data collection and differences in study maturity. Likewise, the most commonly reported adverse events (all grades) were the same as those reported in the two previous pivotal studies. Conclusion: Preliminary data from this expanded access program in over 1400 subjects with multiple myeloma are consistent with results from two earlier Phase III pivotal studies. The EAP of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in multiple myeloma represents a model of how government, advocacy groups, healthcare providers and industry can work together to quickly provide treatment to subjects in need while a clearly active treatment regimen is awaiting approval.

Results of a Phase I Trial of SGN-40 (Anti-huCD40 mAb) in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3576-3576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad A. Hussein ◽  
James R. Berenson ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Nikhil C. Munshi ◽  
Jeffrey Matous ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Aseptic Meningitis ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Population Pharmacokinetic ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract SGN-40 is a humanized anti-CD40 monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated potent in vitro and in vivo efficacy against cell lines expressing CD40, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family. CD40 is widely expressed on tumors of B-cell origin, including myeloma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Hodgkin’s disease, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. SGN-40 has been evaluated in a phase I, multi-dose, single-agent, dose escalation study for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. This single-arm trial was designed to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity. Thirty-two patients were treated at five clinical sites. Patients had been heavily pretreated with a median of four prior regimens and 4.8 years since diagnosis. Initially, patients were treated with four weekly infusions at a cohort-specific dose. This schedule was well-tolerated at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/kg/wk; however, two of three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities following the first dose at 4 mg/kg. One patient had aseptic meningitis (grade 3) and another had headache (grade 3) and aseptic meningitis (grade 4); both patients fully recovered after several days of symptom management. Subsequently, the protocol was amended to allow intra-patient dose-loading, which resulted in successful dose escalation to 8 mg/kg, the highest dose tested. There was neither recurrence of grade 3 neurotoxicity nor evidence of cumulative toxicity. Drug-related adverse events were mostly grade 1 or 2 and included: fatigue (38%), headache (34%), nausea (16%), conjunctivitis (13%), diarrhea (13%), vomiting (13%), anemia (9%), anorexia (9%), chills (9%), and pyrexia (9%). Transient grade 3 elevation of hepatic transaminases (1) and grade 3 neutropenia (1) were observed. Overall, toxicity did not appear to increase in incidence or severity at higher doses. Patients were evaluated at baseline and end of treatment for development of anti-SGN-40 antibodies. Of 30 patients for whom appropriate samples were available for testing, only one low-titer immune response (16 ng/mL) was detected, suggesting that immunogenicity does not appear to be a significant problem in this patient population. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrates dose-proportional changes in Cmax and AUC with a relatively short terminal half-life, similar to that seen in non-human primates. Final analysis of SGN-40 serum levels is ongoing. Although several patients demonstrated decreased M-protein and improvement in subjective symptoms, no patients met criteria for objective response. Five patients (16%) had stable disease at the time of restaging. In summary, dose-dependent toxicity was established only in relation to the first dose of SGN-40, which may be due to partial agonistic signal transduction. Using a dose-loading schedule, SGN-40 was administered up to 8 mg/kg without reaching a maximum tolerated dose. Some patients with advanced myeloma appeared to derive clinical benefit from therapy, and further development of this antibody, either as monotherapy or in combination with other anti-myeloma therapies, is indicated.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3055-3055
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Saima Dean ◽  
Sharon Fung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3055 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen for relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with an overall response rate of 60% and median time to progression of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos ME, et al. Leukemia 2009; 23: 2147-52). We combined lenalidomide with the alkylating agent combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone—an older regimen with minimal cumulative myelosuppression and good activity as second or third line therapy (Trieu Y, et al, Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 1582). The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (CY) on days 1, 8, and 15, lenalidomide on days 1–21 and prednisone 100 mg q 2 days in a 28-day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 × 3 dose escalation design. Thirty-two pts were entered between 11/2007-06/2009; median age was 64 (42-80) yrs, 60% were male, and immunoglobulin isotype was IgG in 19 (62%), IgA in 8 (25%) and light chain in 4 (13%) pts. Median β2-microglobulin level was 257 (92-767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34-48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50-126) μmol/L, platelet count 355 (75-479) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1-6.1) × 109/L. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5). Prior therapy included: ASCT (single in 91%; double in 19%), thalidomide (28%) and bortezomib (50%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; 1 had del 13q but none had t(4;14) or del p53. Table 1 summarizes protocol treatment delivered. Table 1. Dose level N Cyclophosphamide dose (mg/m2) Lenalidomide dose (mg) Prednisone dose (mg) Median # cycles given 1 3 150 15 100 12 (12–34+) 2 3 150 25 100 10 (9–23) 3 26 300 25 100 17 (5–28+) 1–3 (All) 32 150–300 15–25 100 19 (5–34+) Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities during the trial included: thrombocytopenia in 7 (22%) and neutropenia in 9 (29%), managed with dose reduction and/or growth factors; five episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred, all at dose level 3. In cohort 3, other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included 1 episode each of abdominal pain/bacteremia, hypokalemia, fatigue, sick sinus syndrome, cardiac amyloidosis, perforated diverticulum and 2 episodes of DVT. Two heavily pretreated pts developed 2° MDS, including 1 previously treated for lymphoma, 43 and 190 mos after the diagnosis of MM. The best response using modified EBMT criteria was documented at a median of 7 (1-26) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (4 CR, 14 VGPR, 11 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median F/U of 16 (5-34) months, 13 pts remain on study and 18 have progressed at a median of 10 (2-23) mos; 1 was lost to F/U and 9 have died of progressive MM. The 1-year actuarial OS and PFS rates are 93% (95% CI 76–98%) and 78% (95% CI 60–89%), respectively. We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with an acceptable safety profile; 2) the objective response rate (CR + PR + MR) in all 32 pts to date is 94%; 3) the 1-year OS of 93% and PFS of 78% compare favorably with other 3-drug combinations in rel/ref MM pts; 4) further evaluation of this regimen in newly diagnosed pts would be of interest. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Combination of lenalidomide and cyclophosphamide and prednisone in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Phase 1 Study of the Novel Kinesin Spindle Protein Inhibitor ARRY-520 + Carfilzomib in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4082-4082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J. Shah ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Sheeba K. Thomas ◽  
Raymond Alexanian ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kinesin Spindle Protein

Abstract Abstract 4082 Background: ARRY-520, a novel kinesin spindle protein (KSP) inhibitor, has been studied as a single agent and in combination with dexamethasone, and demonstrated promising clinical activity in patients with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Carfilzomib, a novel irreversible proteasome inhibitor (PI), has also demonstrated single agent activity in relapsed and refractory MM, and recently received regulatory approval for this indication. Preclinical data support the presence of synergy with the combination of a PI and a KSP inhibitor via the latter's ability to down-regulate Mcl-1, supporting our hypothesis that the combination of carfilzomib and ARRY-520 (Car-ARRY) would be highly active in relapsed and/or refractory myeloma. We therefore aimed to combine these two agents for the first time, and here report the initial findings from the phase I dose-escalation in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of the Car-ARRY combination. Secondary objectives were to determine efficacy as measured by the overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival and time to next therapy. Patients had to have myeloma that was relapsed and/or refractory, be ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant, bortezomib refractory/intolerant, and prior lenalidomide exposure. ARRY-520 was administered intravenously over 1 hour on days 1, 2, 15 and 16, while carfilzomib was administered intravenously over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 on a 28 day cycle. All patients received growth factor support with filgrastim. Dose-escalation used a standard 3+3 schema proceeded based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during cycle 1, with planned escalation of the dose of ARRY-520. Dose level 1 was ARRY-520 0.75 mg/m2, and carfilzomib was dosed at 20 mg/m2 for cycle 1 on days 1 and 2 and all subsequent dose were at 27 mg/m2. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4, while responses were assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: To date, 8 patients have been enrolled in the ongoing dose escalation phase. The median age was 66 (range 47–80), 6/8 were males, and the median number of prior therapies was 4 (range 2–10). 7/8 patients had undergone prior autologous stem cell transplant, and all patients were bortezomib refractory or intolerant. In the first cohort, 3 patients were enrolled and no dole limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. During the second cohort, ARRY-520 was escalated to 1 mg/m2 with carfilzomib at 20/27 mg/m2, and among the first 3 patients, one patient suffered a DLT in the form of an admission for influenza pneumonia with non-neutropenic fever. Expansion of cohort 2 is currently underway. Among the 6 patients who completed the first cycle of therapy, 5 remain on study. In the first cohort, one patient remains on study with 6 cycles and achieved a near complete remission, 1 patient achieved stable disease, and 1 patient suffered disease progression after first cycle. In the second cohort, all three patients who completed the first cycle have stable disease and remain on trial. In the first 6 toxicity-evaluable patients who have completed one cycle, grade (G) 3 events included one each of pneumonia, diarrhea, and hyperglycemia. There was limited hematologic toxicity with 4/6 patients with G1/2 thrombocytopenia, 3/6 patients with G1/2 anemia, and 1/6 patient with G1/2 neutropenia. Additional G1/2 non-hematologic toxicity included 3/6 patients with diarrhea, 3/6 patients with dyspnea, 3/6 patients with transient elevations in creatinine and 3/6 patients with aspartate aminotransferase elevations. An MTD has not been established and enrollment is ongoing in cohort 2 with carfilzomib at 20/27mg/m2 and ARRY-520 at 1.0 mg/m2. Conclusions: The combination of ARRY-520 and carfilzomib is well tolerated with limited hematologic toxicity and a manageable side effect profile. Notably, in this patient population, with patients who have bortezomib refractory/intolerant myeloma, the combination has demonstrated early signals of activity. Updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Onyx: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: This presentation will include information about Arry-520 which is not yet approved for use in patients with multiple myeloma. Wang:Pharmacyclic: Research Funding; onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hilder:Array BioPharma: Employment. Orlowski:onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; array biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document