Infectious Complications In a Prospective Cohort of Community Based Newly Diagnosed Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL).

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4610-4610
Author(s):  
Jonathan Moreira ◽  
Timothy Call ◽  
Kari Rabe ◽  
Randy Wendt ◽  
Clive S. Zent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Community Based ◽  
History Of ◽  
Culture Negative

Abstract Abstract 4610 Introduction: Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Up to 50% of patients with CLL will develop infectious complications during the course of their disease, and 30–50% of all deaths from CLL are attributed to infections and infectious complications. The risk of infection in CLL is related to immune deficiencies associated with the primary disease process, as well as immunosuppression secondary to treatment. Available research on infectious complications of CLL has focused on patients in clinical trials receiving chemotherapy. Little is known about the natural history of infection in community dwelling patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Method: To explore the natural history of infection in a local, community dwelling cohort of patients diagnosed with CLL, we used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all patients with newly diagnosed CLL seen in the Mayo Clinic Division of Hematology after January 1, 1999 and who resided within 50 mi of Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). All patient hospitalizations were reviewed to document infection including cross-referencing with the electronic Mayo Clinic infection database which includes all culture and serology results obtained from hospitalized Mayo Clinic patients. Patients who had positive blood, sputum, cerebrospinal fluid, pleural fluid, or paracentesis fluid culture results were identified. Patients whose cultures were negative were considered to have culture negative infection. Serologies and viral assays (e.g. CMV viral load) were also reviewed to identify infections. Results: In May 2010, there were 2022 patients in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database with the diagnosis of CLL/SLL made between Jan 1999 – Dec 2009. Of these, 336 (17%) patients resided within a 50 mi radius of Mayo Clinic and were considered non-referred, community-based CLL patients. Median age at diagnosis for these 336 patients was 69 yrs (range 27–97) and most had early stage CLL (57% stage 0; 34% stage I-II). With respect to prognostic markers, 206 (70%) patients were CD38 negative, 125 (64%) ZAP-70 negative, 85 (53%) IgVH mutated, and 101 (63%) had either no abnormality or 13q14- as a sole abnormality on FISH analysis. Consistent with being a community dwelling cohort, ~90% (152/165) of patients had co-morbid health problems and ~50% (86/165) had a major comorbidity (e.g. coronary artery disease, cerebral vascular disease, CHF, diabetes, COPD, other malignancy). Although ~17% (43/249) of patients had gamma-globulin levels below the reference range at diagnosis, only 2% (6/249) had an IgG level <500 mg/dL. Median follow-up for all patients was 49 months (range 0–121) and 104 (31%) patients progressed to require treatment for CLL. Although 222 (66%) patients required hospitalization during follow-up, only 38 (11.3%) were hospitalized with infection. Collectively, these 38 patients were hospitalized for infection 139 times (median 2 hospitalizations for infection per patient). Among these 38 patients, 13 had no organism identified on cultures (culture negative infection) while the remaining 25 (66%) had an organism identified during at least hospitalization for infection. Of the 38 patients hospitalized with infection, 18/38 (47%) had a gram positive organism (8 strep pneumonia, 11 staphylococcus Aureus, 2 nocardia), 11/38 (29%) had a gram negative organism (3 E.Coli, 4 Pseudomonas, 4 Hemophilus influenzae), 5/38 (13%) a mycobacterial infection (4 MAC, 1 M. gordonae), 15/38 (40%) a cytomegalovirus infection, 19/38 (50%), cryptococcus and/or cryptosporidium (18 cryptococcus AG, 4 cryptosporidium), and 12/38 (32%) a filamentous fungi infections (12 aspergillous). In aggregate, hospitalization for an opportunistic infection (e.g. cytomegalovirus, cryptococcus, filamentous fungi, myocobacteria, pneumocystis) occurred in 26/336 (8%) CLL patients during follow-up. Being male (OR 2.7; p=0.02), ZAP-70+ (OR 3.9; p=0.004), IGHV unmutated (OR 5.5; p=0.002), and receiving treatment (OR 4.7, p<0.001; Figure) were associated with increased risk of hospitalization for infection. Conclusions: Approximately 8% of newly diagnosed, community dwelling CLL patients will require hospitalization for opportunistic infection at some point during the course of their disease. Gender, disease factors (e.g. ZAP-70, IGHV status), and treatment characteristics are associated with infection risk. Disclosures: Zent: Genzyme: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; G.S.K.: Research Funding. Shanafelt:Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

The Prevalence of Serious Infectious Complications in a Cohort of Non-Referred Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Compared to Controls: Results of a Cohort Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4610-4610
Author(s):  
Jonathan Moreira ◽  
Kari Rabe ◽  
James R Cerhan ◽  
John Wilson ◽  
Neil Kay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Risk Of Infection ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Abstract 4610 Introduction Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Up to 50% of CLL patients develop infectious complications, and 30–50% of all deaths in CLL patients are attributed to infections. Despite these data, the available research on infectious complications in CLL is primarily limited to patients participating in clinical trials of chemotherapy, obscuring the distinction between the risk of infection due to the disease’s natural history relative to the risk associated with therapy related immune suppression. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), a tertiary referral center in rural southeastern Minnesota, is also the primary hematology center for southeastern Minnesota, northern Iowa, and western Wisconsin. There are no metropolitan areas or hematology specialty centers within a ∼50 mile radius. To explore the natural history of infection in a community-based cohort of CLL patients, we used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all patients with newly diagnosed CLL who resided within 50 miles of MCR and diagnosed between January, 1999 and December, 2009. The comparison cohort consisted of 689 adult patients who also resided within 50 miles of MCR who were seen for a general medical examination between September, 2002 and December, 2009 and who were enrolled as controls in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. All hospitalizations at MCR among both cohorts were audited to document hospitalization with infection and cross-referenced with the Mayo Clinic infection database, which includes all culture results obtained from hospitalized MCR patients. Serologies and viral assays were also reviewed. Patients whose cultures were negative but who were given a clinical diagnosis of infection (e.g. pneumonia) and who were treated with a full course of antibiotic therapy were considered to have a culture negative infection. RESULTS: In May 2010, there were 2022 CLL patients in the Mayo Clinic CLL Database diagnosed between 1999 and 2009. Of these, 174 (9%) were local CLL patients residing within 50 miles of MCR. Median age at diagnosis for these non-referred CLL patients was 69 years (range 27–97). Most had early stage disease (60% stage 0; 32% stage I-II). On prognostic evaluation, 121 (75%) patients were CD38 negative, 66 (61%) ZAP-70 negative, 47 (50%) IGHV mutated, and 56 (62%) had either no abnormality or 13q14- as a sole abnormality on FISH analysis. 64 (37%) patients progressed to require treatment for CLL during follow-up. After median follow-up of 4.0 years (range 0–11), 32 (18.4%) CLL patients were hospitalized with infection at least once as compared to 20/689 (2.9%) individuals in the control cohort (odds ratio=7.5; p<0.0001) Figure 1A. Even prior to receiving treatment for CLL, the rate of hospitalization for infection remained higher than the control cohort (p=0.002; Figure 1B). The 32 CLL patients hospitalized with infection were admitted with infection a total of 89 times (median 1 hospitalization for infection per patient). A specific infectious organism was identified by cultures or serologies in 60 (63%) of the 89 infections in CLL cases and 10/27 (37%) infections among controls. Hospitalization for an opportunistic infection (e.g. cytomegalovirus, cryptococcus, filamentous fungi, mycobacteria, Pneumocystis) occurred in 5/174 (3%) CLL patients during follow-up compared to 0/689 controls (p<0.001). Finally, we performed a pooled multivariable analysis of all patients (n=863) to identify factors (age, sex, CLL diagnosis, CLL treatment) associated with infection risk. Most factors were independently associated with hospitalization for infection [Age (per year, OR=1.03, p=0.02), sex (male, OR=4.0, p<0.001), diagnosis of CLL (OR=2.1, p=0.09), and treatment for CLL (OR=5.9, p<0.001)]. In univariate analysis of CLL patients [sex (OR=4.2, p=0.01), higher Rai stage (p=0.046), unfavorable (del 17p13; del 11q23) FISH [OR=4.6, p=0.02] and unmutated IGHV [OR=2.8, p=0.07]) were associated with risk of infection. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, patients with newly diagnosed CLL had a 7.5-fold risk of hospitalization for infection relative to the control cohort. After 4 year follow-up, ∼1 in 5 CLL patients required hospitalization for infection. Although CLL treatment was a substantial risk factor for infection, the risk of infection among untreated patients remained higher than controls. Disclosures: Kay: Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zent:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Young (≤ 55 years) Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Outcomes.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2901-2901
Author(s):  
Sameer A. Parikh ◽  
Kari G. Rabe ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Wei Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Normal Population ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
History Of ◽  
Modern Era ◽  
Age And Sex

Abstract Abstract 2901 Background: The median age at diagnosis of patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is 72 years (yrs). According to the Surveillance and Epidemiology End Results (SEER) database, approximately 11% of all pts diagnosed with CLL in 2009 were <55 yrs. All previously reported series on the natural history of younger CLL pts are more than a decade old, and did not include information on contemporary prognostic parameters (such as immunoglobulin heavy chain gene mutation status [IGHV], genetic abnormalities by fluorescence in-situ hybridization [FISH], ZAP-70, etc). These reports also occurred prior to the introduction of modern treatment strategies (e.g. chemoimmunotherapy (CIT); reduced intensity allogenic stem cell transplant [SCT]), making their data on important clinical outcomes such as time to first treatment (TTT) and overall survival (OS) of uncertain relevance to younger pts in the modern era. Methods: We explored the natural history of younger pts with CLL using the Mayo Clinic Database. All pts ≤ 55 with pathologic diagnosis of CLL who were seen at the Mayo Clinic between January 1995 and April 2012 were included in this study. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, prognostic variables and administered treatments were abstracted from the medical records. Outcomes of pts in this cohort was compared to CLL pts >55 seen during the same time period. OS of pts ≤55 was also compared to the age- and sex- matched normal population of the state of Minnesota. The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved this study. Results: Collectively, 844 pts ≤ 55 yrs (median age, 48.7 yrs) with newly diagnosed CLL and seen within 1 year of diagnosis were included in this analysis. The characteristics of these pts were compared to 2324 newly diagnosed pts>55 yrs (median age, 68.4 yrs) seen during the same interval. When compared to pts>55, younger pts were more likely to present as intermediate Rai stage disease (p<0.0001), IGHV unmutated (p=0.001), and ZAP-70 positive (p=0.009). Younger pts were also more likely to have 1 or more first degree relatives with CLL (familial CLL) than older pts (10.9% vs. 8.5%; p=0.04). No significant differences were seen in the gender distribution, CD38 status, or FISH risk category. When pts ≤ 55 were further stratified by age, 204 (24%) were ≤45 yrs, 272 (32%) were 46–50 yrs, and 368 (44%) age 51–55 yrs at diagnosis. Similar to the comparison with the >55 year old group, pts ≤45 were more likely to present with intermediate Rai stage disease (61.7%) than those 46–50 yrs (52.5%), or 51–55 yrs (48.8%; p<0.01). Pts ≤45 were also more likely to be IGHV unmutated (p=0.034) and ZAP-70 positive; however, the ZAP-70 status was not significantly different (p=0.095). No difference in the prevalence of familial CLL was observed by the age stratifications of the ≤55 group. After a median follow-up of 5.5 yrs (range, 0–17 yrs), 426 (50%) pts ≤55 had received treatment for CLL and 192 (23%) pts had died. Pts ≤55 had a shorter TTT (4.0 yrs vs. 5.2 yrs; p=0.001) but longer OS (12.5 yrs vs. 9.5 yrs; p<0.0001) compared to pts >55 yrs. In contrast, no differences in TTT or OS were observed when the age ≤55 pts were sub-stratified into the ≤45, 46–50, and 51–55 age groups. A significantly higher proportion of pts≤55 received SCT than those >55 (7% vs. 1%; p<0.0001), with even further stratification of the ≤55 group (SCT age≤45: 13.7%; age 46–50: 5.1%; age 51–55: 3.5%; p<0.0001). As a group, CLL pts ≤55 have significantly shorter OS than the age- and sex-matched population (median CLL=12.5 yrs; median population=not reached; p<0.0001, Figure). However, pts≤55 who were Rai Stage 0 and had mutated IGHV had comparable survival to the general population (p=0.97). Similarly, pts≤55 who were Rai Stage 0 and had favorable FISH results (13q- or normal) had comparable survival to the general population (p=0.27). Conclusion: Our study is the first comprehensive analysis of younger CLL pts in the modern era. We found that younger pts are more likely to present with intermediate Rai stage disease, and have IGHV unmutated and ZAP-70 positive status. Consistent with these characteristics, younger pts experience shorter TTT. Although the OS of younger CLL pts is longer than those >55, their survival relative to the age- and sex-matched normal population is profoundly shortened even with the advent of CIT and SCT. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of a FLAG-Sequential Regimen Followed By Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelodysplasia or Acute Leukemia in Fanconi Anemia: A Franco-Brazilian Report

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2498-2498
Author(s):  
Pierre-Edouard Debureaux ◽  
Flore Sicre de Fontbrune ◽  
Carmem M. S. Bonfim ◽  
Jean-Hugues Dalle ◽  
Nimrod Buchbinder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bone Marrow Failure ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
History Of ◽  
Syncytial Virus

Background: Fanconi anemia (FA) is the most frequent genetic cause of bone marrow failure (BMF) due to a DNA repair mechanism defect. The natural history of FA is marked by progressive BMF during early childhood. Throughout life, the hematopoietic situation may change by clonal evolution toward myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for bone marrow failure in FA patients. The role of HSCT for FA patients with AML or advanced MDS is less defined. Currently, HSCT first line result offers 50% Overall Survival (OS) for patients with cytogenetic abnormalities only and 30% OS for patients with advanced MDS or AML in FA (Ayas et al., JCO 2013; Mitchell et al., BJH 2014). We previously reported a FLAG-sequential approach in 6 patients with FA (5 AML and 1 advanced MDS), all alive at a median follow-up of 28 months (Talbot et al., Hematologica 2014). We update here those patients and report 12 more patients treated by FLAG-sequential since then. Materials & Methods: This retrospective study (2006-2019) was conducted in 7 centers in France and Brazil on behalf of the French Reference Center for Aplastic Anemia to evaluate FLAG-sequential in FA patients with morphological clonal evolution (no patients with cytogenetic abnormalities only). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Anonymous data collection was declared to the appropriate authorities. The FLAG-sequential treatment consisted of FLAG, Fludarabine 30 mg/m²/d for five days and Cytarabine 1 g/m²x2/d with G-CSF for five days, which was followed three weeks later by Cyclophosphamide 10 mg/kg/d for four days, Fludarabine 30 mg/m²/d for four days and TBI 2 Gy (Fig 1A). In a haploidentical setting, Cyclophosphamide at 30 mg/kg/d was performed only in post-transplantation, at Days +4 and +5 (Fig 1B). Results: Eighteen patients were included with 14 AML, 1 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and 3 RAEB-2 (Table 1). The median age at the time of HSCT was 22 years (4-37 years). Fifteen patients (83%) were older than 10 years at the time of HSCT. The median follow-up was 31 months (3- 153 months). Eight patients (44%) had complex karyotype. None of the included patients had a history of solid malignancies before HSCT. All patients engrafted. The cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at Day 60 was 94% (95% CI 63-100%) with a median of 18 days (12-343 days). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment at Day 60 was 83% (95% CI 50%-96%) with a median of 25 days (17-245 days). The donor chimerism was complete at Day +100 for 15 patients. The three patients without full donor chimerism at Day +100 either had a relapse (n=1) and 2 early deaths before Day+100 from steroid-refractory aGVHD (n=1) or septic shock (n=1). None of the patients received a second HSCT. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years was 32% (95% CI 6-58%) (Fig 2). Cumulative incidence of grades II to IV aGVHD was 56% (35% grades III to IV). Cumulative incidence of extensive cGVHD was 16%. Infectious complications during HSCT include the following: CMV (n=8), EBV (n=2), adenovirus (n=4), BK virus (n=7), respiratory syncytial virus (n=1), candidaemias (n=2) and invasive aspergillosis (n=3). Progression free survival (PFS) and OS at 3 years were 53% (95%CI 32-89%) and 53% (95%CI 32-89%), respectively (Fig 2). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 13% (95%CI 0-31%) (Fig 2). Seven patients died during the study. Causes of death were relapse (n=2), aGVHD (n=2), cGVHD (n=1), septic shock (n=1), and respiratory syncytial virus associated with invasive aspergillosis (n=1). GVHD-relapse free survival (GRFS) at 3 years was 48% (95%CI 29-78%). One patient had anal epidermoid carcinoma at 4 years after HSCT, which required multiple surgical ablations. Conclusion: With almost 3 years follow-up, which is long enough for our results to be considered robust, we report an OS and PFS of 53%, which compares favorably to historical controls since all of our 18 patients were treated with florid disease at time of HSCT (and not with cytogenetic abnormality only, known to be associated with a better prognosis). Toxicity is still a concern in this particular population of FA patients with notably a high rate of infectious complications. Future well designed prospective clinical trials will refine this sequential strategy, which appears promising in this particular difficult clinical situation. Disclosures Socie: Alexion: Consultancy. Peffault de Latour:Alexion: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Ibrutinib In Combination With Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate Of Durable Remissions In Patients With High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): New, Updated Results Of a Phase II Trial In 40 Patients

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 675-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan A. Burger ◽  
Michael J. Keating ◽  
William G. Wierda ◽  
Julia Hoellenriegel ◽  
Ghayathri Jeyakumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib is a promising new targeted therapy for patients with mature B cell malignancies, especially CLL and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Single agent ibrutinib induces an overall response rate (ORR) of 71% in relapsed CLL, based on the Phase 1/2 experience. To accelerate and improve responses to ibrutinib in high-risk CLL, ibrutinib was combined with rituximab; we update this Phase 2 single-center clinical trial with a median follow-up of 14 months. Methods Patients were treated with ibrutinib 420 mg PO daily continuously throughout the study Rituximab (375 mg/m2) was administered weekly for the first four weeks (cycle 1), then monthly until cycle 6.at which point patients continued on ibrutinib monotherapy. Study inclusion required high-risk disease (del17p or TP53 mutation [treated or untreated]), PFS < 36 months after frontline chemo-immunotherapy, or relapsed CLL with del11q. Results Characteristics of the 40 patients enrolled included median age of 65 (range 35–82) with a median of 2 prior therapies. There were14 female and 26 male patients. 20 patients had del17p or TP53 mutation (4 without prior therapy), and 13 patients had del11q. 32 patients had unmutated IGHV, only one patient mutated IGHV, the remaining patients had inconclusive IGHV results. The median β2 microglobulin was 4.2 mg/L (2.2 – 12.3), At a median follow up of 14 months, 32 of 40 patients continue on therapy (16 out of 20 with del17p or TP53 mutation) without disease progression. 39 patients were evaluable for response assessment per 2008 IWCLL guidelines; 34 (87%) achieved partial remission (PR), and three (8%) complete remission (CR), accounting for an ORR of 95%. One CR was negative for MRD by flow cytometry, The ORR in the 20 patients with del17p or TP53 mutation was 90% (16 PR, 2 CR). Among the 8 patients that came off study, 3 patient died from unrelated infectious complications (2 cases of sepsis, 1 case of pneumonia), and 1 died from unrelated respiratory and cardiovascular failure. Two patients came off study because of possibly ibrutinib-related toxicity (one subdural hematoma, one grade 3 mucositis), one patient had progressive disease, and one proceeded to stem cell transplantation. Treatment generally was well tolerated, with infectious complications (6 cases of pneumonia and 3 cases of upper respiratory infections) being the most common complication. There were two Grade 3, possibly related AEs: mucositis (n=1), and peripheral neuropathy (n=1). Milder toxicities included Grade 1-2 bruising (n=7), Grade 1 subdural hematoma (n=1), fatigue (n=2), bone pain, myalgias, and arthralgia (n=5), or diarrhea (n=1). Questionnaires revealed significantly improved overall health and quality of life (QOL) after 6 months, based on the EORTC-QOL-v.3 questionnaire, which coincided with a significant weight gain at 3 and 6 months. Conclusion Ibrutinib in combination with rituximab is a safe, well tolerated regimen for high-risk CLL patients, which induces high rates of durable responses. Responses were associated with significant improvements in QOL. Compared to ibrutinib monotherapy, the redistribution lymphocytosis resolves more rapidly and completely (see Figure), and consequently the ORR is higher. Whether the addition of rituximab to ibrutinib therapy translates into longer progression-free and overall survival will be addressed in an upcoming larger, randomized trial of ibrutinib versus iR in relapsed/refractory CLL. Disclosures: Burger: Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Ibrutinib (PCI-32765) for treatment of high-risk CLL patients. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2950-2950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tait D. Shanafelt ◽  
Kari G. Chaffee ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Sameer A. Parikh ◽  
Susan M. Schwager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Male Sex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Consistent with the advanced age at diagnosis (median age ~70 years), most patients with CLL have co-existent health problems. These co-morbidities influence the ability of many CLL patients to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy-based treatment and can also contribute to treatment-related side effects. The recent development of novel signaling inhibitors, particularly the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, has been a major treatment advance for patients with CLL. While these agents generally have favorable toxicity profiles relative to standard chemotherapy-based treatments, they are chronic therapies which patients typically stay on for an extended period. Preliminary data suggests ibrutinib may be associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (Afib). In one randomized trial comparing ibrutinib to ofatumumab in patient with relapsed CLL, incident grade 3+ Afib occurred in 3% of ibrutinib treated patients compared to 0% of ofatumumab treated patients (NEJM 371:213). Despite these observations, the baseline frequency of Afib in patients with CLL is not well described - particularly incident atrial fibrillation acquired during the course of the disease. METHODS: We used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to evaluate the prevalence of Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis as well as the incidence of Afib during follow-up. All patients with a new diagnosis of CLL after January 1995 who were seen at Mayo within 12 months of diagnosis were included in the analysis. Afib was identified by chart review and by billing search using ICD9 codes. Data on co-morbid conditions associated with risk of Afib was also abstracted (e.g. hypertension, coronary artery disease [CAD], valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease). RESULTS: A total of 2444 patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated CLL were seen at Mayo Clinic within 12 months of diagnosis between 1/1995 and 4/2015.Median age at diagnosis was 65 years and 1626 (66.5%) patients were men. A history of Afib was present at the time of CLL diagnosis in 148 (6.1%) patients. Four additional patients had Afib documented in the record but the precise date of onset (e.g. prior to or after CLL diagnosis date) could not be determined. Age, male sex and history of CAD, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with a greater likelihood of having a history of Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis (all p&lt;0.01). Among the 2292 patients without a history of Afib at CLL diagnosis, 139 (6.1%) had incident Afib during the course of follow-up for their CLL. The incidence of Afib among patients without a history of Afib at diagnosis was approximately 1%/year (Figure 1A). Considering both Afib present at the time of CLL diagnosis or acquired during the course of the disease, 291 (11.9%) of the 2444 patients in this cohort experienced Afib (median follow-up: 59 months). Among patients without Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis, the following characteristics at the time of CLL diagnosis were associated with an increased risk of incident Afib on multivariate analysis: older age (age 65-74 HR=2.4, p&lt;0.001; age ≥75 HR=3.6, p&lt;0.001), male sex (HR=1.8, p=0.004); valvular heart disease (HR=2.4, p=0.007), and hypertension (HR=1.5; p=0.02). A predictive model for acquired Afib was subsequently constructed based on the independent factors in the Cox regression model. An individual weighted risk score was assigned to each independent factor based on the regression coefficients of the HRs. The Afib risk score (range 0-7) was defined as the sum of the scores of these independent factors. The risk of incident Afib among patients with risk scores of 0-1, 2-3, 4, and 5+ is shown in Figure 1B. Rates for these 4 groups were significantly different (p&lt;0.001), with the 10-year Afib rates (95% C.I.) for those with a score of 0-1, 2-3, 4, and 5+: 4% (2-6%), 9% (6-13%), 17% (11-23%), and 33% (20-43%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A history of Afib is present in approximately 1 out of every 16 patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Among patients without Afib at diagnosis, the incidence rate of Afib is ~1%/year. The risk of incident Afib in newly diagnosed CLL patients can be predicted based on age, sex, and co-morbid health conditions present at diagnosis. These data provide context to help interpret data on the frequency of Afib in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib and other novel agents. Disclosures Shanafelt: Janssen: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith_Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmactckucs: Research Funding. Ding:Merek: Research Funding. Kay:Tolero Pharm: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Skin Cancers Among Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Patients - the Effect of UV Radiation and CLL Clinical Characteristics

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4772-4772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geffen Kleinstern ◽  
Abdul Rishi ◽  
Sara J Achenbach ◽  
Kari Rabe Chaffee ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Cancer ◽  
Uv Radiation ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Sun Exposure ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Skin Cancers ◽  
History Of ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background: It is well established that the incidence of skin cancers in patients with CLL are significantly elevated compared to age- and sex- matched controls. However, little is known about the characteristics of CLL patients who develop skin cancer. Herein, we evaluate the associations of CLL clinical and prognostic characteristics, along with UV radiation exposure, with risk of first skin cancer following CLL diagnosis. Methods: Newly diagnosed CLL patients from Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic case-control study from 2002-2015 and systematically followed in the Iowa/Mayo Lymphoma SPORE. Clinical and prognostic CLL data were obtained from the Mayo Clinic CLL database, and skin cancer clinical data were abstracted from medical records using a standard protocol. The CLL international prognostic index (CLL-IPI) was computed using a weighted average of five independent CLL prognostic factors (IGHV mutational status, serum b2-microglobulin, Rai stage, age, and FISH 17p deletion/TP53 status). Self-reported history of midday sun exposure at various ages (birth to age 12; 13 to 21 years; 22 to 40 years, and 41+ years) was obtained from a risk factor questionnaire. For each age, we asked the extent of mid-day sun as: practically no exposure (under 3 hours per week), little exposure (4-7 hours per week), moderate exposure (8 to 14 hours per week) and extensive exposure (15+ hours per week). Midday sun exposure was modeled as an ordinal covariate. To evaluate associations with risk of skin cancer following CLL diagnosis, we calculated time from date of CLL diagnosis to date of first skin cancer, death, or last known follow-up. We used Cox regression analysis to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. CLL treatment was considered a time-dependent covariate. Results: Among 846 CLL patients enrolled, the median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 28-91), 68% were male, 7% had Rai stage III-IV at diagnosis. Based on the CLL-IPI, 42% were categorized as low risk, 33% as intermediate risk, and 25% as high or very-high risk. 109 CLL cases (13%) had one or more reported skin cancers at or prior to CLL diagnosis. Melanoma was observed in 19 (2%) cases and non-melanoma was in 90 (11%) cases. At a median follow-up of 7 years from CLL diagnosis, 165 patients (20%) had one or more skin cancers after CLL diagnosis. Among these patients, 49 had skin cancer before CLL diagnosis. The most frequent skin cancer was squamous cell carcinoma (59%), followed by basal cell (31%), melanoma (5%), and Merkel cell (1%). 552 (65%) of the 846 patients returned a questionnaire. Significant associations of clinical and prognostic characteristics with risk of first skin cancer were observed for age (HR=1.35 per 10 year increase, 95% CI=1.17-1.56, P<0.001), male sex (HR=1.38, 95% CI 0.98-1.96, p=0.07), prior history of skin cancer (HR=4.19, 95% CI=2.98-5.88, P<0.001), and CLL-IPI (HR=1.26, 95% CI= 1.03-1.54, P=0.026, after adjusting for age, sex, and prior skin cancer). Of note, the risk of first skin cancer in those CLL patients categorized as very high via CLL-IPI had 2.28 fold risk (95% CI 1.02-5.11). Midday sun exposures for each of the ages considered showed no evidence of association with risk of first skin cancer (all P>0.05). 50 CLL patients were treated prior to first skin cancer following CLL diagnosis; we observed no evidence of association between treatment and risk of first skin cancer (HR=1.44, 95% CI= 0.93-1.92, P=0.12). Conclusion: CLL patients who are at an increased risk of skin cancer following CLL diagnosis are those who either have had a prior history of skin cancer or a more aggressive CLL disease at diagnosis, according to CLL IPI. Routine skin cancer screening is currently recommended for CLL patients. Our data suggest that more frequent screening would be particularly important among patients with aggressive CLL and who have a prior history of skin cancer. Unexpectedly, we found no evidence of association of skin cancer risk with UV radiation following CLL diagnosis or with CLL treatment. Further investigation is needed to determine whether other factors increase the risk of skin cancer following CLL diagnosis. Disclosures Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Thrombosis and Risk of Mortality in Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Polycythemia Vera: An Analysis of the Medicare Claims Database in the United States

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
Aaron T. Gerds ◽  
Shreekant Parasuraman ◽  
Jingbo Yu ◽  
Anne Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

Background Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events (TEs), a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients aged ≥60 years and/or with a history of thrombosis are considered to have high-risk PV. There is limited contemporary, real-world evidence exploring the effect of TEs on mortality in patients with PV. The aim of this analysis was to compare the risk of mortality in patients newly diagnosed with high-risk PV who experienced a TE vs those who did not experience a TE. Study Design and Methods All data from the Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) claims database (Parts A/B/D) from January 2010-December 2017 were used to identify patients with a PV diagnosis (all high risk based on cohort being ≥65 years of age) with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims. The index date was the date of the first qualifying PV claim. Patients with a PV diagnosis or use of cytoreductive therapy within 12 months before the index date (pre-index period) were excluded; ≥12-months continuous medical and pharmacy enrollment pre-index dates was required. The study sample was categorized into TE and non-TE groups based on the occurrence of any of the following events during follow-up: deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, peripheral arterial thrombosis, or superficial thrombophlebitis. TEs were evaluated from the index date to the end of follow-up. Cox regression analyses with time-varying effects were used to assess mortality risk among patients with PV, with post-index TE as a time-dependent variable, stratified by pre-index TE, and adjusting for patient demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions. Results A total of 56,176 Medicare FFS beneficiaries with PV diagnoses met inclusion criteria. The median age was 73 years, 51.9% were men, and 90.7% were white; 10,110 patients (18.0%) had a history of TE before diagnosis (ie, pre-index). In the follow-up period, 20,105 patients (35.8%) had a TE and 36,071 patients (64.2%) did not have a TE. In the comparison between the TE vs non-TE groups, the median (range) age (75.0 [65-104] vs 73.0 [65-106] years, respectively), mean (SD) Charlson comorbidity index score (3.1 [2.6] vs 2.2 [2.3]), and percentage of patients with a history of cardiovascular events (34.1% vs 23.8%), bleeding (13.3% vs 10.4%), or anemia (28.6% vs 23.4%) were higher (Table 1). Among all patients with PV, the median time from diagnosis to first post-index TE was 7.5 months. Among those with pre-index TE (n=10,093), median time from index to first post-index TE was 0.6 months, whereas patients without pre-index TE (n=46,083) had a median time to first post-index TE of 14.2 months. Among all patients with TE during follow-up, the most common TEs were ischemic stroke (47.5%), transient ischemic attack (30.9%), and acute myocardial infarction (30.5%). The risk of mortality was increased for patients who experienced a TE compared with those who did not (hazard ratio [HR; 95% CI], 9.3 [8.4-10.2]; P&lt;0.0001). For patients who experienced a pre-index TE, the risk of mortality was increased for patients who experienced a subsequent TE during follow-up compared with patients who did not (HR [95% CI], 6.7 [5.8-7.8]; P&lt;0.0001). Likewise, for patients who did not experience a pre-index TE, the risk of mortality was increased for patients who experienced a TE during follow-up compared with patients who did not (HR [95% CI], 13.1 [11.4-15.0]; P&lt;0.0001). Conclusions In this real-world study, approximately one-third of patients with newly diagnosed high-risk PV experienced a TE during follow-up and had a 9-fold increased risk of mortality vs those who did not experience a TE. TE risk mitigation remains an important management goal in patients with PV, particularly in those with prior TE. Disclosures Pemmaraju: Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; SagerStrong Foundation: Other: Grant Support; Affymetrix: Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; MustangBio: Honoraria; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria; LFB Biotechnologies: Honoraria; Plexxikon: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pacylex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Honoraria; Roche Diagnostics: Honoraria; Cellectis: Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria. Gerds:Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Imago Biosciences: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Research Funding; Apexx Oncology: Consultancy; AstraZeneca/MedImmune: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding. Parasuraman:Incyte Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yu:Incyte Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Shah:Avalere Health: Current Employment. Xi:Incyte Corporation: Other: Avalere Health is a paid consultant of Incyte Corporation; Avalere Health: Current Employment. Kumar:Avalere Health: Current Employment; Incyte Corporation: Other: Avalere Health is a paid consultant of Incyte Corporation. Scherber:Incyte Corporation: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Verstovsek:Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma Corp: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corp: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Protagonist Therapeutics: Research Funding; ItalPharma: Research Funding; PharmaEssentia: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Phase 2 Trial of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone and Daratumumab in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 304-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaji K. Kumar ◽  
Prashant Kapoor ◽  
Betsy Laplant ◽  
Eli Muchtar ◽  
Francis K. Buadi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Dose Modifications

Abstract Background: The combination of a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), and dexamethasone is the current standard induction therapy for myeloma. Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against CD38, is highly effective in treating myeloma and improves response rates and progression free survival (PFS) when added to PI or IMiD. Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) is an effective, all oral, induction regimen that has been studied in phase 2 and 3 trials. We designed this trial to examine the feasibility and efficacy of adding daratumumab to the IRd regimen. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated MM, with measurable disease and adequate organ function were enrolled irrespective of their transplant eligibility. The primary objective was to determine the rate of complete response to the IRD-Dara combination in patients with NDMM. Treatment consisted of Ixazomib 4mg days 1, 8, 15; lenalidomide 25 mg days 1-21, dexamethasone 40 mg, weekly and daratumumab 16 mg/kg, weekly for two cycles, every other week during cycles 3-6 and then every 4 weeks after that. Overall, 40 patients were accrued; data on 38 patients were available for analysis as of July 02, 2018 (Table 1). Results: The median age was 62 (41-81); 52.6% female. All patients were alive and progression free at last assessment with a median follow up of 5.2 (2.0-12.9) months (median 5 cycles, range 2-13). One patient had gone off for alternate therapy. Responses were rapid with 90% partial response or better (32% VGPR) after 2 cycles, and 100% PR or better (50% VGPR) for 32 patients who have completed 4 cycles. The overall best confirmed response rate among the 38 patients was 95% including 11% CR and 47% VGPR. Overall, 231 cycles have been administered across the study, with dose modifications/ hold required for ixazomib, lenalidomide, daratumumab and dexamethasone in 3 (8%), 11 (29%), 2 (5%), and 8 (21%) patients respectively, the most common reasons being hematologic and skin rash. A grade 3 or higher adverse event at least possibly attributed to the study drugs was seen in 42% of patients, hematologic in 37% and non-hematologic in 11% (Figure). 11 patients have so far proceeded to stem cell collection, all have collected adequate numbers of stem cells for one or two intended transplants(median CD34+ collected 8.4 million/kg; range 3.8-12.3). Updated results with additional 6 months of follow up and MRD testing will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: This represents the first reported results of this combination for treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma. The early results from the use of IRd-Dara in newly diagnosed myeloma suggests excellent efficacy with rapid responses that deepen quickly over the initial cycles of therapy. The regimen was well tolerated with limited dose modifications and no discontinuation for toxicity and no influence on the ability to collect stem cells. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Kumar: Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; KITE: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kapoor:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Dingli:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Other: Participates in the International PNH Registry (for Mayo Clinic, Rochester) for Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Gertz:Prothena: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Teva: Consultancy; annexon: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy; Alnylam: Honoraria; Medscape: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; spectrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Physicians Education Resource: Consultancy; Ionis: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Consultancy.

Infectious Complications Among Individuals with Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL): A Prospective Case-Control Study of Newly Diagnosed Patients,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3903-3903
Author(s):  
Jonathan Moreira ◽  
Kari Rabe ◽  
James R Cerhan ◽  
Curtis A. Hanson ◽  
Timothy G Call ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Local Community ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Control Study

Abstract Abstract 3903 INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis is an asymptomatic hematologic condition characterized by the presence of small populations of clonal B-cells in the blood or bone marrow occurring in 3–5% of the general population over age 40. Although MBL is considered the precursor state to CLL and other sub-types of indolent non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, most individuals with MBL will not develop a B-cell malignancy. It is unknown, however, whether individuals with MBL may be at risk for other adverse outcomes associated with CLL, such as increased risk of infection. To explore this aspect, we evaluated the risk of hospitalization for infection among patients with clinically recognized MBL and compared this to a cohort of general medicine patients and a cohort of CLL patients. METHODS: The Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR), a tertiary referral center in rural southeastern Minnesota, is also the primary hematology center for southeastern Minnesota, northern Iowa, and western Wisconsin. There are no metropolitan areas or hematology specialty centers within a 50 mile radius. To explore the natural history of infection in a local, community dwelling cohort of individuals with clinically identified, CLL-phenotype MBL, we used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to identify all patients with newly diagnosed MBL seen in the MCR Hematology Division between January 1999 and December 2009. Analysis was limited to MBL cases who resided within 50 miles of MCR. The comparison cohort consisted of 689 adult patients also resided within 50 miles of MCR who were seen for a general medical examination between September 2002 and December 2009 and who were enrolled as controls in a case-control study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Rates of infection among individuals with MBL were also compared to a cohort of 174 patients with newly diagnosed CLL diagnosed in the same time interval and who resided within 50 miles of MCR. All hospitalizations in these 3 groups were audited to document hospitalization with infection including cross-referenced with the electronic Mayo Clinic infection database, which contains all culture results obtained from hospitalized patients at MCR. Serologies and viral assays (e.g. CMV viral load) were also reviewed. Patients whose cultures were negative but who were given a clinical diagnosis of infection (e.g. pneumonia) and who were treated with a full course of antibiotics were considered to have a culture negative infection. Among the cases, only hospitalizations after CLL or MBL diagnosis were considered. RESULTS: In May 2010, there were 524 individuals in the Mayo Clinic MBL/CLL Database with the diagnosis of CLL-phenotype MBL made between January 1999 – December 2009. Of these, 154 (29%) patients resided within a 50 mile radius of Mayo Clinic and were considered a local, community-based cohort of MBL patients. Median age at MBL diagnosis for these 154 patients was 70 years (range 45–94). After median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0.3–10.6 years), 25 (16%) individuals with MBL were hospitalized with infection as compared to 20/689 (3%) individuals in the control population (odds ratio MBL relative to control=6.5; p<0.001) and 32/174 (18%) in the cohort of patients with newly diagnosed CLL (OR MBL relative to CLL=0.9; p=0.61) (Figure 1). The 25 MBL patients hospitalized for infection were hospitalized a total of 39 times (median 1 hospitalization for infection per individual). A specific infectious organism was identified by cultures or serologies in 8/39 (21%) hospitalizations among individuals with MBL, 10/27 (37%) hospitalizations for infection among controls, and 60 (63%) of the 89 hospitalizations for infection in CLL cases. Finally we performed a pooled multivariable analysis of all patients (n=1017) adjusting for age, sex, presence of MBL, diagnosis of CLL, and whether patients with CLL or MBL received treatment for CLL during follow-up. All factors were independently associated with risk of hospitalization for infection [Age (per year, OR=1.02, p=0.02), sex (male, OR=2.6, p=0.001), presence of MBL (OR=3.3, p<0.001), diagnosis of CLL (OR=3.0, p=0.002), and treatment for CLL (OR=3.3, p<0.001)]. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, patients with newly diagnosed clinical-MBL had a 6.5 fold risk of hospitalization for infection relative to the control cohort. MBL was an independent risk factor for hospitalization for infection after controlling for age, sex, and treatment. Disclosures: Zent: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Kay:Biothera: Research Funding; Clegene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Supergen: Research Funding; Calistoga: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent Biosolutions (Formerly Trubion): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Risk of Cancer in Patients with Clinical Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL): A Cohort Study of Newly Diagnosed Patients Compared to Controls.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2893-2893
Author(s):  
Benjamin M Solomon ◽  
Kari G. Rabe ◽  
Jonathan Moreira ◽  
Susan Schwager ◽  
James R Cerhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Abstract 2893 Introduction: Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis (MBL) is a common asymptomatic condition characterized by a clonal B-cell population detected in the blood or bone marrow. The prevalence of MBL is approximately 3–5% in adults over age 40 but rises with age. MBL is a precursor state to CLL and other types of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Only a small subset of patients with MBL comes to clinical attention, typically during evaluation for low grade lymphocytosis (designated now as clinical MBL). The rate of progression to CLL requiring treatment among individuals with clinical MBL is ∼1%/yr, and the vast majority of patients with MBL will never develop a B-cell malignancy. Recent data indicate that individuals with MBL are at increased risk of infection similar to CLL. It is unknown whether individuals with MBL are at risk for other adverse outcomes associated with CLL, such as increased risk of non-hematologic cancers (NHC). We investigated the incidence of NHC among patients with clinical MBL and compared this to a cohort of general medicine patients and a cohort of CLL patients. Methods: Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR) is the primary center for hematologic care in a region including southeastern Minnesota, northern Iowa, and western Wisconsin. No other hematology specialty centers are available within a 50 mile radius of MCR. To explore the risk of NHC in a local, community dwelling cohort of individuals with clinically-identified, CLL-phenotype MBL, we used the MCR CLL database to identify all individuals with newly diagnosed MBL seen in the MCR Hematology Division between January 1, 1999 and December 31, 2009. Analysis was limited to 154 MBL cases residing within 50 miles of MCR. The comparison cohort consisted of 596 adult general medicine patients, with no prior cancer, residing within 50 miles of MCR, who were seen for a general medical exam and enrolled as controls in a case-control study for NHL between April 25, 2004 and December 31, 2009. Rates of NHC in the MBL cohort were also compared to a cohort of 174 patients with newly diagnosed CLL seen in the same time interval as the MBL cohort and also living within 50 miles of MCR. NHC were identified using the Mayo Clinic Cancer Tumor Registry as well as review of medical records in all 3 cohorts. Patients with a NHC diagnosis >3 months prior to the diagnosis date of MBL/CLL were excluded from analysis while those with MBL/CLL and a NHC within 3 months of one another were considered to have a concurrent diagnosis. Results: There were 125 patients in the MBL cohort, 153 in the CLL cohort, and 596 in the control cohort after excluding patients with prior cancers. The MBL and CLL patients tended to be older (median age MBL=69, CLL=68, Control=58; p<0.0001) and more likely to be male (% male MBL=61, CLL=67, Control=46; p<0.0001) than the controls. After a median follow-up of 4.2 years (range 0–11), 20 (16%) individuals with MBL developed NHC as compared to 22 (4%) of the controls (Hazard Ratio (HR) MBL relative to control=5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI)=(2.6, 9.4; p<0.0001). Twenty CLL patients (13%) developed NHC, supporting a similar rate to that of MBL patients (HR MBL relative to CLL=1.3; 95% CI=(0.6, 2.5; p=0.49;See Figure). Specifically, the MBL cohort had a higher incidence of cancer of the breast, lung, and nervous system than that of the control cohort. The higher risk of NHC among individuals with CLL and MBL persisted even when patients with “concurrent diagnosis” of CLL/MBL and NHC were excluded (p=0.006) and when patients treated for progressive CLL were censored at the date of treatment (p=0.001) Finally, we performed a pooled multivariable analysis of all patients (n=874) adjusting for age, sex, major co-morbidities, presence of MBL, and diagnosis of CLL. Age (HR each year older=1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.06; p=0.003), major comorbidities (HR=1.81; 95% CI 1.07–3.00; p=0.02), CLL (HR=2.10; 95% CI 1.01–4.01; p=0.04), and MBL (2.47; 95% CI 1.30–4.69; p=0.02) were independent risk factors for NHC. The results were similar when the effects of age was modeled in a non-linear (e.g. logarithmic) manner. Conclusions: In this cohort study, patients with newly diagnosed clinical MBL had a 2.5-fold increased risk of developing NHC relative to the control cohort. MBL was an independent risk factor for development of NHC after adjusting for age, sex, and other comorbidities. This finding adds to the growing evidence that clinical MBL has a distinct clinical phenotype. Disclosures: Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith-Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Polyphenon E International: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document