Rituximab and Reduced Dose CHOP (R-mini-CHOP) for Patients Over 80 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) – Groupe d'Etude Des Lymphomes De l'Adulte (GELA) Study LNH03-7B

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 853-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederic Peyrade ◽  
Fabrice Jardin ◽  
Christian Gisselbrecht ◽  
Antoine Thyss ◽  
Jean François Emile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Albumin Level ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 853 Introduction: Half of the cases of DLBCL occurs in patients over 65 years but very few data are available for patients over 80 years. These older patients however seem to respond as younger patients when treatment can be tolerated. In the aim to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of a reduced dosage chemotherapy regimen associated with rituximab in this population, the GELA initiated in 2005 a prospective, multicenter, phase II study. Patients and methods: Patients older than 80 years with untreated CD20+ DLBCL, Ann Arbor stage I with bulky mass to IV and a performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 were eligible. Patients were treated with mini-CHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide: 400 mg/m2 D1; doxorubicine: 25 mg/m2 D1; vincristine: 1 mg total dose D1 and prednisolone 40 mg/m2 by oral route from D1 to D5) plus rituximab (375 mg/m2 D1) every 21 days for 6 cycles. GCSF was optional. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of R-mini-CHOP as measured by the overall survival. Secondary endpoints were response rate, progression free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS) for complete responders and toxicities. Survival results are presented on an intend-to-treat basis. Response to treatment was evaluated according to 1999 Cheson criteria. Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-patients (51 male, 99 female) were included in 38 centers of the GELA. The median age was 84 years (range 80–95). Seventy-five percent of patients had a stage III/IV. LDH level was elevated in 69% of patients. Age-adjusted (aa) IPI was 2–3 in 66% of patients. One-hundred-twenty-nine patients completed the first three cycles and 108 received the whole regimen. The Dose-Intensity for patients who completed the three first cycle was 100% and 96.8% for doxorubicine and cyclophosphamide respectively. Thirty-six percent of patient received at least one injection of GCSF. The overall response rate was 74%, including 40% of complete response and 23% of unconfirmed complete response. At the time of this analysis, in July 2010, the median follow-up time was 20 months. The 2-year overall survival was 58.9% [95% CI: 49.3–67.2%]. The two-year estimated PFS, EFS and DFS were 47.4% [95% CI: 38.1–56.2%], 44.8% [95% CI : 35.7–53.6%] and 56.6% [95% CI : 49.3–67.2%] respectively. Hematological toxicity was the most common side effect. Grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 39% of the patients and grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia in 7%. Eleven patients (7%) experienced at least one episode of febrile neutropenia. Overall patients experienced a median of 4 nights of hospitalization during treatment phase (range 0–46). Thirty patients died during the treatment evenly distributed between treatment toxicity (6.7%) lymphoma (6.7%) and intercurrent causes (6.7%). In a univariate analysis, PS 0 or 1, aaIPI 0 or 1, number of extra-nodal sites <2, albumin level >35g/l, mass <10cm and a high IADL (Instrumental activities of daily living) score appear to be highly predictive of a prolonged survival. In a multivariate analysis a PS equal to 0 or 1 and an albumin level >35 g/l were significantly associated with a longer survival. Conclusion: In patients over 80 years with DLBCL and a good performance status, immunochemotherapy with R-mini-CHOP appears to be safe and effective, indicating that a substantial proportion of very old patients could indeed be cured. This regimen could be considered as a platform for the introduction of new drugs in the first line treatment of this population. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Weekly Topotecan for Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma: Tolerability and Efficacy Study—The Israeli Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 475-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Safra ◽  
Tara Berman ◽  
Adelya Yachnin ◽  
Ilan Bruchim ◽  
Mihai Meirovitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Tubal Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical activity and toxicity of weekly topotecan in a large cohort of epithelial ovarian (EOC), primary peritoneal (PPC), and tubal cancer patients.MethodsRecords of patients with recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer who were treated with weekly topotecan (4.0 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 on a 28-day cycle) after failure of more than 1 prior regimen were retrospectively reviewed in 8 centers in Israel.ResultsTwo hundred four patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Median age was 62 years (range, 27–89 years); 121 (59.3%) were platinum sensitive. Patients were exposed to a median of 2 previous lines (range, 1–9), and 48.5% received only 1 prior chemotherapy regimen. Median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 2.5–112 months). Overall response rate was 26.5%, of which 11 patients (5.4%) had complete response, and 43 patients (21.1%) had partial response. Clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stable disease) was 65.7%. Median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5–4.5 months). There was no significant difference between platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients regarding response rate or progression-free survival. Median overall survival from disease diagnosis was 45.0 months (95% CI, 40.04–49.6 months) and 16.0 months (95% CI, 12.3–19.7 months) from initiation of topotecan therapy. Overall survival was significantly different between patients with platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant disease (19.9 vs 10.8 months, respectively, P = 0.003; 95% CI, 8.1–16.3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that only platinum sensitivity and topotecan line were associated with overall survival. Weekly topotecan was well tolerated—with only 16.7% of patients experiencing grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities. There were no other grade 4 toxicities, and only 6.9% grade 3 toxicities.ConclusionsIn this large cohort of recurrent EOC, PPC, and tubal cancer, weekly topotecan was well tolerated with good clinical benefit rate, comparable to previous studies.

Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone-Thalidomide Followed by Maintenance With Bortezomib-Thalidomide Compared With Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone for Initial Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Updated Follow-Up and Improved Survival

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 634-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive

Purpose Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) has improved overall survival in multiple myeloma. This randomized trial compared VMP plus thalidomide (VMPT) induction followed by bortezomib-thalidomide maintenance (VMPT-VT) with VMP in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Patients and Methods We randomly assigned 511 patients who were not eligible for transplantation to receive VMPT-VT (nine 5-week cycles of VMPT followed by 2 years of VT maintenance) or VMP (nine 5-week cycles without maintenance). Results In the initial analysis with a median follow-up of 23 months, VMPT-VT improved complete response rate from 24% to 38% and 3-year progression-free-survival (PFS) from 41% to 56% compared with VMP. In this analysis, median follow-up was 54 months. The median PFS was significantly longer with VMPT-VT (35.3 months) than with VMP (24.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; P < .001). The time to next therapy was 46.6 months in the VMPT-VT group and 27.8 months in the VMP group (HR, 0.52; P < .001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was greater with VMPT-VT (61%) than with VMP (51%; HR, 0.70; P = .01). Survival from relapse was identical in both groups (HR, 0.92; P = .63). In the VMPT-VT group, the most frequent grade 3 to 4 adverse events included neutropenia (38%), thrombocytopenia (22%), peripheral neuropathy (11%), and cardiologic events (11%). All of these, except for thrombocytopenia, were significantly more frequent in the VMPT-VT patients. Conclusion Bortezomib and thalidomide significantly improved OS in multiple myeloma patients not eligible for transplantation.

Pre-Phase Chemotherapy Followed By Ofatumumab (OFA) and Reduced Dose CHOP (OFA-mini-CHOP) for Patients over 80 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) – a Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) Prospective Phase II Study (LNH09-7B)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3042-3042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frédéric Peyrade ◽  
Bologna Serge ◽  
Vincent Delwail ◽  
Jean François Emile ◽  
Christian Rose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: R-miniCHOP is the standard chemotherapy for patients over 80 years (y) with DLBCL. In the LNH 03-7B trial, the 2-year overall survival was 58.9% [95% CI: 49.3-67.2%]. Grade III/IV toxicity and deaths occurred during the two first cycles mainly (Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):460-8). In order to improve overall survival (OS) rituximab (R) was replaced by Ofatumumab (OFA), a humanised anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. In vitro data suggest that OFA induces more potent complement-mediated cytotoxicity than rituximab, and clinical data demonstrate activity of OF in rituximab-refractory lymphomas). In addition, to reduce early toxicity a pre-phase (PP) with vincristine and prednisone (P) was tested. Patients and methods: Patients older than 80 y with untreated CD20+ DLBCL, Ann Arbor stage I to IV, left ventricular ejection fraction > 50%, and a performance status (PS) of 0 to 4 were eligible. Patients received a PP with vincristine (1 mg TD D-7) and P (60 mg TD D-7 to D-4) before the first cycle of OF-miniCHOP. PP was followed by miniCHOP chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide: 400 mg/m² D1; doxorubicine: 25 mg/m² D1; vincristine: 1 mg total dose D1 and prednisolone 40 mg/m² by oral route from D1 to D5) plus OFA (1000 mg TD) every 21 days for 6 cycles. GCSF was optional. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of PP OF-mini-CHOP as measured by the OS. Secondary endpoints were response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), disease-free survival (DFS) for complete responders and toxicities. Survival results are presented for all included patients on an intend-to-treat basis (n=120). Response to treatment was evaluated according to 1999 Cheson criteria. Results: From June 2010 to November 2011, One-hundred-twenty-patients (male, female) were included in 41 centers of the LYSA. The median age was 83 years (range 89-95). Seventy-seven percent of patients had a stage III/IV. LDH level was elevated in 58% of patients. Age-adjusted (aa) IPI was 2-3 in 57% of patients. One-hundred-twenty patients completed the PP, 107 the first three cycles and 89 received the whole regimen. For patients who started the first cycle, the mean relative Dose-Intensity during trial was 98%, 97% and 96 % for OFA, doxorubicine and cyclophosphamide respectively. Seventy-eight percent of patient received at least one injection of GCSF. The overall RR was 67.5%, including 35.8% of complete response and 20 % of unconfirmed complete response. At the time of this analysis, in September 2013, the median follow-up time was 26.6 months. The 2-year overall survival was 64.7% [95% CI: 55.3-72.7%]. The two-year PFS, EFS and DFS were 57.2% [95% CI: 47.7-65.6%], 53.1% [95% CI: 43.7-61.6%] and 66.6% [95% CI: 54.0-76.5%] respectively. Haematological toxicity was the most common side effect. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 20.8% of the patients and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 1.7%. Seven patients (5.8%) experienced at least one episode of febrile neutropenia. Infusion reaction related to OFA was reported in 12.5% of patients. Prolonged hospitalization (> or = 10 days) was observed in 17 cases (14.1%) and mainly occurred during cycle 1 to cycle 3. Forty-five patients died during the treatment evenly distributed between lymphoma (62.2%), intercurrent and other causes (22.2%), and concurrent illness (15.6 %). No toxic death was reported. Six patients died during treatment (1 during PP, 4 during cycle 1 to cycle 3, 1 during cycle 4 to cycle 6) Thirty-nine patients died during follow-up. In univariate analysis, low aaIPI (0 /1) is the unique statistically significant prognostic factor of prolonged OS (OR 3.083, [1.458-6.517] CI95%). Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score equal to 4 is associated with a longer PFS. By contrast, low Albuminemia level, undernutrition according to buzby index and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were not predictive of survival. Conclusion: In DLCBL patients over 80 y, immunochemotherapy with PP OFA-mini-CHOP appears to be safe and effective, confirming that a substantial proportion of very old patients can be cured. The use of a PP seems to reduce the early death risk. OFA and PP seems to improve OS comparing with the previous reported data. The combination of a PP, monoclonal antibody against CD20 and miniCHOP can be the new standard regimen for DLBCL patients over 80 y. Disclosures Off Label Use: Use of ofatumumab in high grade lymphoma..

Rituximab Combined to ACVBP (R-ACVBP) Supported by Pegfilgrastim as a New Inductive Treatment Followed by High-Dose Consolidative Autotransplantation (HDC) for Poor Risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in First-Line. Results of LNH 03–39B. A GELA Study.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 3437-3437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Belhadj ◽  
Jean-Philippe Jais ◽  
Pierre Feugier ◽  
Christian Gisselbrecht ◽  
Christian Recher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract ACVBP dose-intense induction regimen followed by HDC provides a better event-free survival and overall survival (OS) as compared to a conventional consolidative treatment in responding patients (pts) with aggressive lymphoma presenting with 2 or 3 factors of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (aa-IPI). However, complete response rate (CRR = CR+CRu) after ACVBP is not superior to 65%. Besides, it is established that Rituximab (R) combined with CHOP improves CRR and OS. Several controlled studies have demonstrated that a single dose of pegfilgrastim provides similar neutrophil recovery than filgrastim after chemotherapy in cancer patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a single dose of pegfilgrastim (6 mg) at d3 of the 4 cycles of R-ACVBP inductive regimen (rituximab 375 mg/m2 d1,doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 d1, cyclophosphamide 1,200 mg/m2 d1, vindesine 2 mg/m2, bleomycin 10 mg d1 and d5 and prednisone 60 mg/m2 d1-d5) delivered every 15 days in order to maintain an optimal combined dose intensity (CDI). CDI was defined as the minimum received dose intensities of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide by each patient. Secondary objectives were to investigate if R combined to ACVBP translates into an improvement of CRR and progression free survival (PFS). The number of leukaphereses and CD34+ cells collected in responding pts were also analyzed. Responding pts received HDC with BEAM followed by stem cell rescue. From 01/2004 to 12/2005, 60 pts were enrolled: median age was 50 y (range: 21–60), 80% with aaIPI 2 and 20% with aa-IPI 3. The mean CDI was 89 (95% CI: 86–93), greater than theoretical cut-off of 85% (p=0.0017). After induction, 63% of pts achieved CR/CRu, 25% were in PR; 2 pts died during the induction phase. At least one episode of grade 3–4 neutropenia was observed in 98% of pts, 67% experienced grade 3–4 anemia, 38% thrombocytopenia and 73% febrile neutropenia. More than 2.106 CD34+ cells/kg were collected in 80% of the pts after the 3rd and/or 4th R-ACVBP while a collection failure was observed in 11 pts (20%), 7 of them being further collected with filgrastim. The median number of leukaphereses was 2. Among the 56 responding pts, 48 received HDC. With a median follow-up of 2 years, 2-year PFS was 71% (95% CI:61–84), and OS was 91% (95% CI:74–97). We conclude that CDI is satisfactory with pegfilgrastim support. R-ACVBP dose-intense induction regimen is feasible and safe on such high-risk pts but does not increase the complete response rate. However, PFS and OS seem encouraging; a longer follow-up is needed to see whether the addition of rituximab definitely contributes to decrease the relapse rate.

Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine Combined with GMCSF and Rituximab in Heavily Pre-Treated Relapsed / Refractory B-Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1616-1616
Author(s):  
Shinoj Pattali ◽  
Stephanie A. Gregory ◽  
Melissa Leigh Larson ◽  
Jamile M. Shammo ◽  
Elena Bogdanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 1616 Background: Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) are commonly treated with anthracycline-containing combination chemotherapy regimens. Although a proportion of patients can be cured, 40 –50% of patients relapse or are refractory to frontline therapy. High dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the current standard of care of relapsed aggressive lymphomas in eligible patients. Many patients cannot proceed to HDT as a result of reasons like advanced age, significant co morbidities and resistance to salvage chemotherapy. Moreover, the optimal salvage regimen is not known. Hence there is need to develop novel regimens that are likely to benefit these patients. Gemcitabine and rituximab are active agents in relapsed or refractory lymphoma and have demonstrated synergistic effects. GMCSF has been shown to potentiate the efficacy of Rituximab. In this study we evaluated the clinical activity, toxicity and tolerability of a salvage regimen that incorporated sequential combination of gemcitabine, rituximab and GMCSF (Sargramostim, Leukine). Methods: This trial was designed as a prospective, open and uncontrolled phase II study. 13 patients with relapsed or refractory B cell lymphoma were enrolled from Nov 2001 to Mar 2006 at Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. All patients were scheduled to receive up to 6 cycles of Gemcitabine 800mg/m2 IV infusion over 120 minutes on days 1 and 8, GMCSF 250mcg/m2 subcutaneously once daily on day 9 through 15 (7doses) and Rituximab 375mg/m2 IV infusion on day 16. Cycles were repeated every 21 days to a total of 6 cycles. Responses were evaluated by CT scans and bone marrow exam (if involved) after the third course and at the end of the study. Primary endpoint was response rate. Secondary endpoints were toxicity evaluation, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients were followed for toxicity, response, PFS and OS. Results: Of the 13 patients in the study, 9 patients completed 6 cycles of therapy and were evaluable for response. The median age was 43 years (range 24 –75 years) with 6 males (66.6%) and 3 females (33.3%). 92% of patients had very advanced disease with stage III or IV disease (Stage IV-61.5% and stage III-30.8%), and 30.8% were poor risk (IPI 3–5). Major histological subtypes were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (33.3%), Hodgkin lymphoma (33.3%) and follicular lymphoma (11.1%). Eight patients (88%) demonstrated extra nodal disease at one or more sites at presentation indicating a more aggressive lymphoma. Most of the patients were heavily pretreated with multiple combination chemotherapy or chemo immunotherapy with a median of 3 prior chemotherapy regimens (range 2–6). The majority of patients were complete responders after first line induction therapy. In the intent to treat analysis of responses, the overall response rate was 55.5% with 4 complete responses (44.5%) and 1 partial response (11.1%). Disease progression occurred in 4 patients (44%). Progression free survival ranged from 2 to 71 with a median of 6 months. Overall survival measured from 2 to 102 months with a median of 10 months. At last follow-up 22% of (2 of 9) were alive. Toxicity profile of this regimen was similar to other salvage therapies used in this patient population with an increased incidence of grade 3/4 anemia (15.3%) and thrombocytopenia (7.6%).No grade 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities were observed. Conclusions: Based on the result of our study, we conclude that gemcitabine combined with GMCSF and rituximab is an effective, feasible and tolerable regimen in heavily pre-treated aggressive relapsed lymphomas. Long-term remissions are possible in patients with heavily pre-treated relapsed/refractory lymphoma with complete remissions lasting for 78–102 months even in patients who relapsed after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Disclosures: Shammo: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC).　Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

scholarly journals Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

2020 ◽  
pp. JCO.20.02259
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Joan Bladé ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and rapidly and selectively releases alkylating agents into tumor cells. The phase II HORIZON trial evaluated the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a population with an important unmet medical need. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with RRMM refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody received melflufen 40 mg intravenously on day 1 of each 28-day cycle plus once weekly oral dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg (20 mg in patients older than 75 years). The primary end point was overall response rate (partial response or better) assessed by the investigator and confirmed by independent review. Secondary end points included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. The primary analysis is complete with long-term follow-up ongoing. RESULTS Of 157 patients (median age 65 years; median five prior lines of therapy) enrolled and treated, 119 patients (76%) had triple-class–refractory disease, 55 (35%) had extramedullary disease, and 92 (59%) were refractory to previous alkylator therapy. The overall response rate was 29% in the all-treated population, with 26% in the triple-class–refractory population. In the all-treated population, median duration of response was 5.5 months, median progression-free survival was 4.2 months, and median overall survival was 11.6 months at a median follow-up of 14 months. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 96% of patients, most commonly neutropenia (79%), thrombocytopenia (76%), and anemia (43%). Pneumonia (10%) was the most common grade 3/4 nonhematologic event. Thrombocytopenia and bleeding (both grade 3/4 but fully reversible) occurred concomitantly in four patients. GI events, reported in 97 patients (62%), were predominantly grade 1/2 (93%); none were grade 4. CONCLUSION Melflufen plus dexamethasone showed clinically meaningful efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, including those with triple-class–refractory and extramedullary disease.

scholarly journals Impact of superselective intra-arterial and systemic chemoradiotherapy for gingival carcinoma; analysis of treatment outcomes and prognostic factors

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n = 66; SCRT group: n = 18). Results The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups. Conclusions This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study of Melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200) Versus Melphalan 100 mg/m2 (MEL100) in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 55-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Maria Teresa Petrucci ◽  
Antonietta Falcone ◽  
Anna Marina Liberati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Psychiatric Disease ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Several trials have shown the superior impact of high-dose melphalan (usually 200 mg/m2, MEL200) versus standard therapy in myeloma patients. Intermediate-dose melphalan (100 mg/m2, MEL100) was also superior to the standard dose, but MEL100 has not been clinically compared with MEL200 in a randomized study. In a case-matched study, response rate and event-free survival of MEL200 were superior to MEL100, but overall survival (OS) was similar. In this prospective, randomized, phase III trial, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of MEL200 and MEL100. Between January 2002 and July 2006, 299 patients were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were previously untreated myeloma, aged < 65 and Durie and Salmon stage II or III. Exclusion criteria were abnormal cardiac function, respiratory disease, abnormal liver function, abnormal renal function, HBV, HCV, or HIV positivity, concomitant cancer or psychiatric disease. The institutional review board approved the protocol and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients received: 2 dexamethasone-doxorubicin-vincristine debulking courses (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 day 1, vincristine 1 mg day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg days 1, 2, 3, 4, each course repeated every 28 days), 2 cycles of cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2, day 1) plus G-CSF followed by stem cell harvest. The MEL200 group was conditioned with 2 cycles of melphalan 200 mg/m2 followed by stem cell reinfusion; the MEL100 group was conditioned with 2 courses of melphalan 100 mg/m2 followed by stem cell reinfusion. At the present, 246 patients, median age 57 (range 32–65), completed the assigned therapy and were evaluated for response, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS. One-hundred and twenty-four patients were randomized to MEL200 and 122 to MEL100. Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. Abnormal cytogenetics (13q deletion, t(4;14), t(11;14), p53) were 75% in MEL200 patients and 56% in MEL100 patients (p=0.05). Forty-six patients did not complete tandem MEL200; 36 patients did not complete tandem MEL100. The near complete response rate of MEL200 was superior to MEL100 (32% versus 18%, p=0.011), but partial response was 80% versus 71%, respectively (p=0.079). The median follow-up for censored patients was 26.5 months. The 3 years PFS was 51% in the MEL200 arm and 33% in the MEL100 arm (HR=0.81, 95% CI 0.55–1.21, p=0.31). The 3 years OS was 86% in the MEL200 group and 71% in the MEL100 group (HR=0.82, 95 CI 0.45–1.48, p=0.51). Duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was comparable in two arms, but MEL200 patients required more platelet transfusions (p=0.03). Grade 3–4 non-hematological adverse events were reported in 49% of the MEL200 patients and in 38% of the MEL100 patients (P=0.07). The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were infections (54% of MEL200 patients versus 45% of MEL100 patients, p=0.25), mucositis (31% of MEL200 patients versus 7% of MEL100 patients, p=0.002) and gastrointestinal toxicities (20% of MEL200 patients versus 14% of MEL100 patients, p=0.3). In conclusion, MEL200 resulted in a significantly higher near complete response rate but this did not translate in a superior PFS and OS.

The Addition of Rituximab to CHOP Chemotherapy Improves Response Rate, Failure-Free Survival and Overall Survival for Follicular Grade 3 Lymphoma Compared to CHOP Alone

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1289-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Mark Hess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
High Risk Patient ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Historical Comparison ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: FL3 is a subcategory of follicular lymphomas that is challenging in that it behaves aggressively like large cell lymphomas. If treated with CHOP, however it has a clinical course of relapse and treatment failure similar to grade 1–2 follicular lymphoma. We looked at the outcome of FL3 patients treated with RCHOP, combining rituximab with CHOP. There are no large study reports of this regimen’s results in FL3 to our knowledge. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 45 patients with follicular grade 3 lymphoma who were treated with rituximab and the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). Response rate (RR), failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and a historical comparison to 111 CHOP only treated patients was made. Results: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) distribution was: 47% Low, 36% Low-Intermediate, 13% High-intermediate, and 4% High-risk. The complete response rate was 96%. Forty-four out of 45 patients are still alive. Median follow-up is 3.5 years. The 3-year FFS rate according to IPI was 80% (95% CI: 64% to 100%) in low risk, 81% in low-intermediate (95% CI 64% to 100%), and was 50% (95% CI: 25% to 100%) in high-intermediate/high-risk patient group. The addition of rituximab to CHOP improved both 5-year FFS, 71% (95% CI: 58% to 87%) compared to 44% of CHOP alone (95% CI: 36% to 55%) with p-value of 0.019 and 5-year OS, 98% (95% CI: 93% to 100%) compared to 75% (95% CI: 67% to 84) with p-valule of 0.0034. The addition of rituximab to CHOP improve the FFS compared to CHOP alone when subgroups of IPI were analyzed and compared (p=.002) Conclusion: The addition of rituximab to CHOP provided a high response rate and excellent early survival. Poor risk patients continue to demonstrate a high rate of failure despite the use of rituximab.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document