Identification of Differential Methylation Markers Among Cytogenetic Risk Groups of Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1464-1464
Author(s):  
Min Fang ◽  
Xiaoyu Qu ◽  
Jerry Davison ◽  
Liping Du ◽  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Differential Methylation ◽  
The Other ◽  
P Value ◽  
Single Region ◽  
The Right ◽  
Methylation Ratio

Abstract Abstract 1464 Aberrant DNA methylation has been shown as an important mechanism in the progression from myelodysplasia (MDS) to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), leading to use of the demethylating agents, 5-azacitidine and decitabine, for treatment of both disorders. While these drugs produce responses, the ability to distinguish potential responders from potential non-responders remains limited. The purpose of this work was to bring new technology to study this problem. Recent studies demonstrated that promoter DNA methylation is not randomly distributed in AML blasts but rather is highly organized and associated with biologically distinct AML subtypes. Because cytogenetics at presentation is the most important prognostic factors in predicting response to therapy, remission duration and overall survival in AML, we aimed to identify differentially methylated genomic regions (DMR) in cytogenetically defined risk groups of AML. Published literature suggested that the new comprehensive high-throughput array-based relative methylation analysis (CHARM) has the highest sensitivity and specificity among all the array-based genome profiling methods and should be the most accurate means to identify methylation markers. It is a customized NimbleGen HD2 array of tiled 50mer-probes typically separated by 30–40 bases covering approximately 4.6 million CpG sites across the genome. This assay is highly quantitative for approximately 100,000 independent CpG sites. We performed methylation profiling with CHARM on 15 age-matched patients divided into 3 groups (n=5 in each): (1) high-risk AML, defined as patients with a complex or monosomal karyotype, inv(3)/t(3;3), t(6;9), or FLT3-ITD; (2) intermediate-risk AML, defined as patients with normal karyotype, trisomy 8, t(9;11), or others; (3) low-risk AML, defined as patients with t(8;21) or inv(16). Five age-matched normal individuals served as control. Randomly fractionated DNA was divided into two equal portions with and without McrBC treatment, which cleaves methylated DNA, then size-fractionated, purified and subject to whole-genome amplification prior to hybridization with the CHARM array. Data analysis was performed with R and Bioconductor. AML patients showed a very strong hypermethylation signature as compared with the normal control blood. A unique set of DMRs was identified which distinguishes between any two risk groups. The number of DMRs and those with p -values < 0.01 are shown in Table 1. There were fewer methylation discriminators between low- and mid-risk groups than between high-risk and the other risk groups. Figure 1 shows the comparison between high-risk group and other risk groups highlighting the 12 top DMRs with lowest p -values. In silico validation of the DMRs identified by CHARM verified previously reported aberrant hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes like p15CDKN2B, discriminating normal from AML patients, CDH1 promoter hypermethylation in high-risk AML compared with mid-risk AML, and HOXB3 hypomethylation in mid-risk AML compared with both low-risk and high-risk AML, etc. Technical validation using quantitative bisulfite pyrosequencing on 8 genes, including DCC, DUOX2, NEFL, and PITX1, demonstrated an 87.5% concordant rate with CHARM. Testing of additional AML samples with validated markers are underway to confirm the top DMRs identified, which may serve as useful biomarkers to predict response to azacitidine and decitabine.Table 1Number of DMRsNumber with p-value < 0.01Normal blood VS at risk3768311Low-risk VS mid-risk156530Low-risk VS high-risk247573Mid-risk VS high-risk2651107Figure 1.Results from the CHARM analysis on AML patients stratified by cytogenetic risk, highlighting comparison between the high-risk and other risk groups. The top twelve differentially methylated regions ( DMRs) with p -value < 0.01 are shown. Box-and-whisker plots to the left of the dashed vertical line in each panel present the log2 methylation ratio of the high-risk group and the other two risk groups combined, in a single region of differential methylation. To the right of the dashed line the high-risk group is compared with each of the other groups. Each panel's header text identifies the genomic region.Figure 1. Results from the CHARM analysis on AML patients stratified by cytogenetic risk, highlighting comparison between the high-risk and other risk groups. The top twelve differentially methylated regions ( DMRs) with p -value < 0.01 are shown. Box-and-whisker plots to the left of the dashed vertical line in each panel present the log2 methylation ratio of the high-risk group and the other two risk groups combined, in a single region of differential methylation. To the right of the dashed line the high-risk group is compared with each of the other groups. Each panel's header text identifies the genomic region. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Treatment Outcome of Discontinued L-Asparaginase in Children with Standard-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Tokyo Children’s Cancer Study Group (TCCSG) Study L99-15.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 878-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chitose Ogawa ◽  
Akira Ohara ◽  
Atsushi Manabe ◽  
Ryoji Hanada ◽  
Hiroyuki Takahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Standard Risk

Abstract BACKGROUND: L-asparaginase (L-asp) is one of the key drugs in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children. However, L-asp often produces severe adverse effects including anaphylaxis resulting in its discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate retrospectively the outcome of discontinuation of L-asp in patients with ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children newly diagnosed as ALL between 1999 and 2003 were consecutively enrolled on the TCCSG L99-15 study. Risk stratification was based on the age, initial white blood cell count, immunophenotype, cytogenetics and the response to prednisolone monotherapy. Totally, 267 (35%) out of 770 children were categorized into a standard-risk group (SR), 317 (41%) into a high-risk group (HR) and 186 (24%) into a very high-risk group (HEX). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation was indicated approximately in 50% of the HEX patients. L-asp was used 9 times in the induction phase in all the risk groups. The total number of L-asp administration all through the treatment was 19 in SR, 20 in HR and at least 10 in HEX. Patients were divided into two groups in the analysis: group A patients who received at least 50% of scheduled doses of L-asp and group B patients who received less than 50%. RESULTS: Remission was obtained in 259 (97%) patients in SR, 311 (98%) in HR and 171(92%) in HEX. In the patients who achieved remission and were analyzed, 195 (83.7%) in SR, 223 (78.8%) in HR and 123 (83.7%) in HEX received all the scheduled doses of L-asp. Event-free survival (EFS) (SE) and overall survival (OS) (SE) at 5 years for all the risk groups are shown in the table. Notably, EFS in group A (92.9%) and in group B (74.1%) in SR was significantly different (p=0.025). CONCLUSION: The outcome in patients who received less than 50% of scheduled dose of L-asp was inferior to that in the patients who received more than 50% of the scheduled dose. This suggests that modification or intensification of the treatment should be considered for the patients who discontinued L-asp in SR. EFS and OS in each group Risk group EFS ± SE(%) OS ± SE(%) (No. in A /B) group A group B p value group A group B p value SR (223 /10) 92.9±2.4 74.1±16.1 0.025 97.8±1.1 88.9±10.5 0.066 HR (269 /14) 78.5±3.2 66.7±19.2 0.969 88.9±2.6 50.0±25.0 0.158 HEX (142 /5) 58.2±5.5 75.5±21.7 0.514 75.6±4.3 80.0±17.9 0.873

scholarly journals Prevalence of Genetic Abnormalities in Patients with Multiple Myeloma and Its Clinical Relevance in a Developing Country like India

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Author(s):  
Aditi Shah ◽  
Nataraj KS ◽  
Sundareshan T S ◽  
Shilpa Prabhu ◽  
Bharath RAM S ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Fish Analysis ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Genetic Abnormality ◽  
Standard Risk

Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy involving terminally differentiated plasma cells. Its incidence in India is about 0.7/1,00,000 population amounting to about 6,800 new cases a year A number of genomic aberrations are associated with MM, most of which confer prognostic significance. Cytogenetic abnormalities are a part of R-ISS score for prognostication which stratifies presence of del(17p), t(4;14) or t(14;16) as stage 3, mSMART is another risk stratification tool which divides MM into high risk and standard risk groups based on genetic aberrations. Hence it is evident that determining the genetic abnormality in MM is important. however, due to limited resources genetic testing is not routinely done and the data in the Indian population is limited. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of molecular cytogenetic abnormalities by Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis in patients with MM and to assess the co-relation with response to induction chemotherapy, relapse and overall survival. Material and Methods: 64 patients were included from January 2016 to December 2019 and followed up till June 2020. Interphase FISH study was performed either at diagnosis or at relapse, on bone marrow aspirate with panel of probes consisting of CKS1B (1q21-22), CDKN2C (1p32.3), D13S319 (13q14.2/13q34), IGH (14q32.33), p53 (17p13.1) and trisomy (5p15/9q22/15q22) (trisomies are considered as hyperdiploidy in this study). Plasma cell purification techniques were not applied prior to FISH analysis. Patients were divided into 2 risk groups; 1) high risk group with presence of del17p, del13q, amplification 1q, del1p and two or more aberrations with either of these and 2) standard risk group with presence of hyperdiploidy or no genetic abnormality. There was no difference in chemotherapy regimen between the 2 groups; 46 (71.8%) received bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone, 10 (15.6%) received bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone, 2(3.1%) received bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone, 1(1.5%) received daratumumab-bortezomib-dexamethasone and 5(7.8%) received 2 drug chemotherapy. Patients who did not complete minimum follow up of 6 months either due to death or lost to follow up were excluded from the study. Institutional Ethics Committee's approval was taken. Results: Mean age of the population was 60.33 years and male to female ratio was 1.65. 46.87%, 28.13% and 25% of the study population were in the age group of ≤ 60, 61 - 65 and ≥66 years respectively. 12.3%, 43.8% and 43.8% were in R ISS stage 1, 2 and 3 respectively. FISH analysis was done on 61 out of 64 patients (remaining 3 were excluded due to hemodilute bone marrow sample). 22 (36.1%) patients had abnormal genetic aberration on FISH analysis with 10 (16.39%) having two or more abnormalities. The frequency of genetic aberrations was as follows; amplification 1q (13/61, 21.31%), del13q (9/61, 14.75%), hyperdiploidy (7/61, 11.47%), del17p (4/61, 6.55%), IgH rearrangement (3/61, 4.91%), and del1p (1/61, 1.6%). All 3 patients with IgH rearrangement had associated one or more high-risk genetic aberration and hence were included in high risk group. 31.1% of the patients were high risk and 68.9% were standard risk. The response to induction chemotherapy, incidence of relapse, time to 1st relapse and total number of relapses are shown in (table;1) and there was no significant difference between high risk and standard risk group. Overall survival in standard risk group at 2 and 5 years was 89.6% ± 5.8% and 78.6% ± 13.9% and in high risk group was 60.7% ± 13.2% and 29.5% ± 23.1% respectively (p value: 0.762). Overall survival was significantly lower in age group ≥66 years as compared to age group ≤ 60 years and 61 - 65 years (p value 0.001) and it was also significantly lower in R ISS stage 3 as compared to R ISS stage 1 and 2 (p value 0.006). Conclusion: More than one third patients of MM (36.1%) showed genetic abnormality, amplification 1q being the most frequent. Overall survival was significantly lower in older age group and R ISS stage 3 patients. Response to induction chemotherapy and relapse rate were similar in high and standard risk groups. Although overall survival was lower in high risk group, it was statistically not significant. This study highlights the importance of FISH analysis for disease stratification and prognostication which should be routinely practiced. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Establishment of an immune-related gene pairs model to predict colon adenocarcinoma prognosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihang Luo ◽  
Puyu Liu ◽  
Leibo Wang ◽  
Yi Huang ◽  
Yuanyan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Colon Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Related Gene ◽  
Immune Genes ◽  
Gene Pairs ◽  
Immune Related Gene

Abstract Background Colon cancer is the most common type of gastrointestinal cancer and has high morbidity and mortality. Colon adenocarcinoma(COAD) is the main pathological type of colon cancer. There is a lot of evidence describing the correlation between the prognosis of COAD and the immune system. The objective of the current study was the development of a robust prognostic immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs) model for estimating overall survival of COAD. Methods The gene expression profiles and clinical information of patients with colon adenocarcinoma come from TCGA and GEO databases and are divided into training and validation cohorts. Immune genes were selected which show significantly association with prognosis. Results Among 1647 immune genes, a 17 IRGPs model was built which was significantly associated with OS in the training cohort. In the training and validation data set, the IRGPs model divided patients into high-risk groups and low-risk groups, and the prognosis of the high-risk group was significantly worse( P <0.001). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis confirmed the feasibility of this model. Functional analysis confirmed that multiple tumor progression and stem cell growth-related pathways in high-risk groups were up-regulated. T cells regulatory and Macrophage M0 were significantly highly expressed in the high-risk group. Conclusion We successfully constructed an IRGPs model that can predict the prognosis of COAD, which provides new insights into the treatment strategy of COAD.

scholarly journals Retrospective Comparative Analysis of POPF Using Fistula Risk Score According to Pancreaticoenterostomy Method

2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 559-563
Author(s):  
Seungmin Lee ◽  
Kwang Yeol Paik
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Clinical Risk Score ◽  
Reconstructive Methods ◽  
Fistula Risk Score

Background The aim of this study is to examine whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is the better reconstructive method to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the fistula risk. Methods An institutional database was reviewed for patients undergoing PD between January 2008 and August 2019. A total of 159 patients were stratified into 4 groups according to the Clinical Risk Score-Pancreatic Fistula. POPF according to 4 risk groups was compared between PJ and PG. Results Of the 159 patients, 82 underwent PG (51.6%) and 77 underwent PJ (48.4%) reconstruction. POPF rate was 17.1% (n = 14) in the PG group and 12.9% (n = 10) in the PJ group (P = 0.51). POPF rates were not different in intermediate, low, and negligible risks between 2 reconstructive methods. In the high-risk group (n = 47), there were 4 POPFs (22.2%) in PJ group and 9 (31.0%) in the PG group, respectively (P = 0.74). Conclusion In PD, there was no superior method of reconstruction with regard to POPF, even in high-risk glands.

scholarly journals MO048MULTICENTRE PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF THE URINARY PEPTIDOME-BASED CLASSIFIER CKD273 AS A PREDICTOR OF RENAL FUNCTION DECLINE IN SUBJECTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Lindhardt ◽  
Nete Tofte ◽  
Gemma Currie ◽  
Marie Frimodt-Moeller ◽  
Heiko Von der Leyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Renal Function Decline

Abstract Background and Aims In the PRIORITY study, it was recently demonstrated that the urinary peptidome-based classifier CKD273 was associated with increased risk for progression to microalbuminuria. As a prespecified secondary outcome, we aim to evaluate the classifier CKD273 as a determinant of relative reductions in eGFR (CKD-EPI) of 30% and 40% from baseline, at one timepoint without requirements of confirmation. Method The ‘Proteomic prediction and Renin angiotensin aldosterone system Inhibition prevention Of early diabetic nephRopathy In TYpe 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria trial’ (PRIORITY) is the first prospective observational study to evaluate the early detection of diabetic kidney disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and normoalbuminuria using the CKD273 classifier. Setting 1775 subjects from 15 European sites with a mean follow-up time of 2.6 years (minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 4.3 years). Patients Subjects with T2D, normoalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 ml/min/1.73m2. Participants were stratified into high- or low-risk groups based on their CKD273 score in a urine sample at screening (high-risk defined as score &gt; 0.154). Results In total, 12 % (n = 216) of the subjects had a high-risk proteomic pattern. Mean (SD) baseline eGFR was 88 (15) ml/min/1.73m2 in the low-risk group and 81 (17) ml/min/1.73m2 in the high-risk group (p &lt; 0.01). Baseline median (interquartile range) urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was 5 (3-8) mg/g and 7 (4-12) mg/g in the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.01). A 30 % reduction in eGFR from baseline was seen in 42 (19.4 %) subjects in the high-risk group as compared to 62 (3.9 %) in the low-risk group (p &lt; 0.0001). In an unadjusted Cox-model the hazard ratio (HR) for the high-risk group was 5.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (3.9 to 8.5; p&lt;0.0001). After adjustment for baseline eGFR and UACR, the HR was 5.2, 95 % CI (3.4 to 7.8; p&lt;0.0001). A 40 % reduction in eGFR was seen in 15 (6.9 %) subjects in the high-risk group whereas 22 (1.4 %) in the low-risk group developed this endpoint (p&lt;0.0001). In an unadjusted Cox-model the HR for the high-risk group was 5.0, 95 % CI (2.6 to 9.6; p&lt;0.0001). After adjustment for baseline eGFR and UACR, the HR was 4.8, 95 % CI (2.4 to 9.7; p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion In normoalbuminuric subjects with T2D, the urinary proteomic classifier CKD273 predicts renal function decline of 30 % and 40 %, independent of baseline eGFR and albuminuria.

scholarly journals Immune-Related Four-lncRNA Signature for Patients with Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Zheng ◽  
Benben Cao ◽  
Xia Zhang ◽  
Zheng Niu ◽  
Jinyi Tong
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gynecological Malignancy

Cervical cancer (CC) is a common gynecological malignancy for which prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers are urgently needed. The signature based on immune-related lncRNAs (IRLs) of CC has never been reported. This study is aimed at establishing an IRL signature for patients with CC. A cohort of 326 CC and 21 normal tissue samples with corresponding clinical information was included in this study. Twenty-eight IRLs were collected according to the Pearson correlation analysis between the immune score and lncRNA expression ( p < 0.01 ). Four IRLs (BZRAP1-AS1, EMX2OS, ZNF667-AS1, and CTC-429P9.1) with the most significant prognostic values ( p < 0.05 ) were identified which demonstrated an ability to stratify patients into the low-risk and high-risk groups by developing a risk score model. It was observed that patients in the low-risk group showed longer overall survival (OS) than those in the high-risk group in the training set, valid set, and total set. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for the four-IRL signature in predicting the one-, two-, and three-year survival rates was larger than 0.65. In addition, the low-risk and high-risk groups displayed different immune statuses in GSEA. These IRLs were also significantly correlated with immune cell infiltration. Our results showed that the IRL signature had a prognostic value for CC. Meanwhile, the specific mechanisms of the four IRLs in the development of CC were ascertained preliminarily.

scholarly journals “Don’t Eat Me” Signals of Neuroblastoma by CD47 for Immune Escape: A Novel Prognostic Biomarker

Proceedings ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (25) ◽  
pp. 1538
Author(s):  
Safiye Aktas ◽  
Ayse Pinar Ercetin Ozdemir ◽  
Efe Ozgur Serinan ◽  
Zekiye Altun ◽  
Nur Olgun
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Immune Escape ◽  
Prognostic Biomarker ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
P Value ◽  
Mycn Amplification

Recent studies have shown that cancer cells can deceive phagocytosing macrophage cells through the CD47 protein which gives the message “don’t eat me” or “don’t kill me” to immune components. The efficacy of anti-CD47 treatment approach was shown in cancers such as, non-small cell lung cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovarian cancer, and breast cancer. The studies on the immunobiology of neuroblastoma has increased as monoclonal antibody based immunotherapy has shown to be effective in high-risk patients such as anti disialoganglioside. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the levels of CD47 protein expression among neuroblastoma patients with different risk groups and genetic alterations. This study included paraffin-embedded tumor tissues of 66 neuroblastoma patients (28 girls, 38 boys) with an age range of 0.5 to 108 months with a mean value of 24.9 (±23.5). According to risk classifications 21 were at low risk (31, 8%), 24 were at intermediate risk (36, 4%) and 19 were at high-risk (28, 8%) groups. These samples were evaluated for MYCN amplification, 1p36 LOH, 11q23 deletion and 17q25 gain by real-time PCR. In addition, CD47 expression status (positive or negative) was detected by immunohistochemical analysis. All data was analyzed with Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney U non-parametric tests within SPSS program, version 22.0. p value lower than 0, 5 was found statistically significant. According to the results, patients at low risk did not express CD47, while patients at high-risk group were mostly expressing CD47 (p = 0.049). MYCN amplification positive patients were expressing CD47 protein (p = 0.046). Patients without 17q25 gain were found to be expressing CD47 protein (p = 0.006). In addition, CD47 expression was increasing as age was getting higher in terms of months (p = 0.018). The findings of this study suggest that positive expression pattern of CD47 may be a poor prognostic biomarker especially in high risk 17q gain negative neuroblastoma patients.

Validation of a Novel Tissue Array Based Classification of Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1671-1671
Author(s):  
Nizar J Bahlis ◽  
Alex Klimowicz ◽  
Paola Neri ◽  
Anthony Magliocco ◽  
Douglas A. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Protein Array ◽  
Immunoperoxidase Staining ◽  
Initial Testing ◽  
Independent Validation

Abstract Background: Gene expression profiling molecular classification of MM was proven to be an independent predictor of survival post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT); however it had limited clinical applicability due to its complex methodology and high costs. We have previously reported the results of a protein-array based classification of MM in an initial testing cohort and concluded that positive immunoperoxidase staining for FGFR3, Cyclin B2 or Integrin beta7 correlates with a shortened survival post ASCT (Bahlis et al. Blood2007:110:449a). We now report on the results of this TMA classification in a larger and independent validation cohort. Methods: Immunoperoxidase staining for Cyclins B1, B2, D1, D2 and D3, FGFR3, PAX5 and Integrin beta 7 were previously validated in our initial testing cohort (n=52). Further analysis of our initial testing cohort identified 3 risk groups: positive expression of FGFR3 or Integrin beta 7 defined as “High risk”, positive Cyclin B2 (in the absence of FGFR3 or Integrin beta 7) as “Intermediate risk” and the lack of expression of any of these biomarkers defined as “Low risk”. In order to confirm the predictive value of our proposed protein-array classification, these immunohistochemical (IHC) stains were performed on the bone marrow biopsies of a larger and independent validation cohort of 79 newly diagnosed MM patients uniformly treated with a dexamethasone based regimen followed by ASCT. The clinical parameters, response criteria and survival outcomes (TTP and OS) of this validation cohort were defined according to the international uniform response criteria. For IHC analysis two pathologists who were blinded with regards to the clinical outcome of these patients scored the cases independently as positive or negative. Discordance in their scoring was seen in 20/79 (25.7%) with a consensus scoring reassigned to all of these cases. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and TTP. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression method. Figure Figure Results: 79 patients were included in this validation cohort, the median age was 54.4 yrs (27.9–71), 23.7% had ISS stage III, median beta 2-microglobulin was 3.29 mg/L (1.16–37.5). Del13q and t(4;14) were detected by FISH in 35.6% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. Post ASCT, 68% achieved a CR or VGPR with an overall median TTP and OS of 2.29 years (CI 1.84–2.73) and 5.74 years (CI 4.98–6.51) respectively. Expression of FGFR3 was detected in 7.6% of the patients, cyclin B2 in 58.2% and integrin-beta7 in 17.7%. In univariate analysis expression of FGFR3 was associated with a significantly shorter TTP (P=0.011) but not OS (P=0.114). Similarly integrin-beta7 predicted for a shorter TTP (P=0.008) but not OS (P=0.570). Cyclin B2 also predicted for worse TTP (P=0.047) but not OS (P=0.098), whereas the expression of cyclins D1, D2, D3 and PAX5 did not affect survival. Based on our testing cohort definition of risk groups, 18/79 (22.8%) were considered as “High risk” with significantly shorter TTP 0.93 years (CI 0.74–1.12) compared to 2.29 years (CI 1.88–2.69) and 3.35 years (CI 2.51–4.19) for the “Intermediate” (34/79; 43%) and “Low” (27/79; 34.2%) risk groups respectively (P=0.002). The 5-years estimates for OS was 57.1% for the High-risk group compared to 66.3% and 71.6% for the Intermediate and Low risk group respectively (P=0.258). Multivariate analysis was performed using ISS, del13q and the TMA risk group classification as variables. The TMA classification and del 13q were the only independent predictors of TTP with the high-risk group having 3.4 fold greater risk of relapse (P=0.001). Conclusion: We have validated our protein array based classification of Multiple Myeloma and confirmed its survival predictive value post ASCT. MM patients with the High-risk signature should be spared the toxicity of ASCT and considered instead for other frontline novel therapeutic agents.

Reduced Intensity Conditioning with Thiotepa and Fludarabine for Allogeneic Transplantation: Evidence for Low Toxicity and Long-Lasting Disease Control in MDS with Low/Intermediate-1 IPSS Score and in AML from MDS in Complete Remission.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3285-3285
Author(s):  
Emilio Paolo Alessandrino ◽  
Luca Malcovati ◽  
Giorgio La Nasa ◽  
Paolo de Fabritiis ◽  
Massimo Bernardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Valvular Stenosis

Abstract This study investigated Thiotepa (TT) and Fludarabine (Fluda) as a preparative regimen for allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute leukemia from MDS (MDS-AML) older than 50 or with comorbidities contraindicating standard conditioning. Patients were prepared with TT, given over 3 hours as an i.v. infusion at a dose of 10 mg/kg over two days (day -8 and day -7) and Fluda at the dose of 125 mg/m2 i.v. over five days ( from day -7 to day -3). Fresh or cryopreserved allogeneic peripheral stem cells were infused on day 0 or +1. Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A (CyA) at the dose of 1.5 mg/kg day as a continuous iv infusion from day -5 until engraftment. The CyA was then administered orally at the dose of 3 mg/kg twice a day. Doses were adjusted to maintain plasma level concentrations between 150–350 mg/dL. From day +60, in the absence of acute GvHD, the CyA was tapered down by 20% every 2 weeks until withdrawal. In addition, patients received methotrexate 10 mg/m2 on day +1, and 8 mg/m2 on days + 3, +6 and +11 after transplantation. At the time of transplantation, patients were classified in two risk groups (low vs high risk) according to IPSS score (low/intermediate-1 vs. intermediate-2/high) for MDS patients, and disease status (CR vs. not CR) for MDS-AML. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out to compare Overall Survival (OS), Transplant-Related Mortality (TRM) and probability of relapse. Fifty patients (29 males, 21 females) entered the study; the median age was 54 years (range 38–71). Sixteen MDS patients had a low/intermediate 1 score according to the International Prognostic Score System (IPSS), 16 had an intermediate 2/high IPSS score, 18 had MDS-AML. Thirty patients underwent transplantation as front-line therapy, 20 received one or more cycles of chemotherapy before transplant. Among the latter, nine with MDS-AML were in complete remission at the time of their transplant, while four were in a partial remission. The interval from diagnosis to transplantation ranged from 1 to 52 months (median value 11 months). Contraindications to a standard conditioning regimen were liver disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy secondary to hypertension or valvular stenosis, cardiac arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, previous CNS bleeding, and a history of sepsis. All but one patient achieved engraftment, with full donor chimerism by day +30. Patients were followed up for a median time of 21 months (range 0.2–87). TRM at 1 and 2 years after transplantation was 25% and 33%; the 5-year probability of relapse was 27%. Twenty-six patients are alive in complete remission, and the 5-year OS is 50%. The 5-year OS was 73% and 28% in low- and high-risk patients respectively (p=0.002). TRM at 1 and 2 years after transplantation was 13% and 21% in the low-risk group and 39% and 45% in the high-risk group (p=0.046); the 5-year probability of relapse was 10% and 50% in the low- and high-risk group respectively (p=0.015). In a multivariate Cox regression, risk group retained a borderline significance (HR=2.6, p=0.07) when adjusted by age at transplantation (p=0.03) and interval from diagnosis to transplant (n.s.). The combination of Thiotepa and Fludarabine is an effective and well-tolerated conditioning regimen in patients with MDS or MDS-AML who are poor candidates for standard myeloablative transplantation, particularly in MDS patients with low/intermediate-1 IPSS score and MDS-AML patients in CR.

Chemotherapy-associated thrombosis in cancer outpatients: Risk factors and decision making of a prophylactic approach.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20647-e20647
Author(s):  
Martina Torchio ◽  
Benvenuto Franceschetti ◽  
Carla Cavali ◽  
Sonia Zanirato ◽  
Angelo Olgiati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Factors Analysis ◽  
Negative Predictor

e20647 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), is a negative predictor of survival in pts with advanced cancer. International guidelines don’t recommend routine prophlaxis but suggest to consider pts, undergoing chemotherapy (CT), with high risk of VTE. Many clinical risk factors for cancer-associated VTE have been evaluated in a 5 parameter-based (body mass index, platelet and leucocyte counts, hemoglobin value and tumor site) scoring system, the Khorana score, utilized to indicate a prophylactic approach. We prospectively applied this score in cancer outpts beginning CT and an implementation based on 6 addictional factors analysis (sex, age, central venous catheter, CT-agents, antiangiogenetic drugs, erithropoiesis stimulating agent) to evaluate their impact in pts assignment into risk groups. Methods: We studied adult pts, followed at our Department from August 2011 to December 2012, with advanced cancers (breast, NSCLC, colorectal, pancreatic/gastric, urogenital, LNH, Hodgkin's disease, HD, and MM), receiving a first or second line standard CT. We stratified pts into three risk groups (score 0= low; score 1-2=intermediate; score 3-4-5=high) considering both the Khorana scoring system and its implementation. Results: We analyzed 169 pts (103F/66M, median age 62.3, range 35-80 yrs), pt population included: 38 breast, 32 colorectal, 31 LNH, HD and MM, 27 urogenital, 22 NSCLC and 19 pancreatic/gastric. With the Khorana score 49 pts were assigned to the low risk, 87 pts to the intermediate risk (57 with score=1, 28 with score=2), 16 pts (9.4%) to the high risk group (9 with score=3, 4 with score=4, 3 with score=5). When we considered 11 parameters 37 pts (21.8%) were assigned to the high risk group. Conclusions: A more comprehensive quantification of VTE risk, also considering new independent factors, is mandatory for a correct decision making of an antithrombotic-prophylactic approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document