Nilotinib Combined with Multi-Agent Chemotherapy for Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Interim Results of Korean Adult ALL Working Party Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1517-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dae-Young Kim ◽  
Young Don Joo ◽  
Je-Hwan Lee ◽  
Jung-Hee Lee ◽  
Dong Hwan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Multi Agent ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract Abstract 1517 Background: Incorporation of imatinib into classical cytotoxic chemotherapy has improved the response and survival of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Nilotinib (Tasigna, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland), a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor with enhanced in-vitro inhibition of BCR-ABL kinase, showed faster and deeper responses than imatinib among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Moreover, less serious gastrointestinal adverse effects of nilotinib may be beneficial to combination with intensive chemotherapy in Ph+ ALL when compared with imatinib. Herein, we report interim results of a prospective single-arm multicenter phase-2 study evaluating the safety and efficacy of nilotinib-combined multi-agent chemotherapy in Ph+ ALL. Methods: Patients aged over 18 years old were eligible if they had newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL, and adequate hepatic/renal/cardiac function. Diagnosis of Ph+ ALL was dependent upon confirmation of t(9;22) with cytogenetics by conventional GTL-band technique, and/or positive molecular analysis with nested RT PCR for detection of BCR-ABL fusion transcripts. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients received induction treatment consisting of vincristine, daunorubicin, oral prednisolone, and nilotinib. After achieving complete remission (CR), patients received either 5 courses of consolidation followed by 2-year maintenance with 6-mercaptopurine plus methotrexate, or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) according to the donor availability and his/her general condition. Nilotinib was administered twice a day with a single dose of 400mg (800mg per day) from day8 of induction until the initiation of alloHCT or the end of maintenance therapy. Quantitative RT-PCR assays were performed at the central lab with Light-Cycler Technology at the time of diagnosis, at CR, and every 3 months thereafter. BCR-ABL quantification was expressed relative to the amount of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) mRNA. The molecular response was defined as complete (MCR) if the BCR-ABL/G6PDH ratio was less than 1×10−6. Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). For interim analysis, outcome was updated as of July 1, 2011. Results: A total of 50 consecutive patients (male: female = 22: 28) were enrolled onto the study between January 2009 and December 2010. The median age was 44.5 (range 18–71) years old. Type of BCR breakpoint was minor (e1a2) in 66% of patients. The median BCR-ABL/G6PDH ratio was 6.09 (bone marrow) and 3.08 (peripheral blood) at the diagnosis. Except five patients who died in aplasia during induction, 45 (90%) patients achieved hematologic remission (HCR), and MCR rate was 54% at the time of HCR. During the whole treatment periods, administration of nilotinib was interrupted 50 times among 30 patients, and dose was reduced among 6 ones. Of 45 patients who achieved HCR, median dose intensity (DI) of nilotinib between day8 and day of confirmation of HCR was 769.2mg (range 160–800), and MCR rates were not different among two subgroups when dichotomized using the median dose intensity (60.9% vs. 59.1%). During the induction, 20% of patients experienced ≥grade 3 jaundice, which were all reversible, and 2% experienced pancreatitis. Thirty three patients underwent alloHCT, 19 with myeloablative and 14 with non-myeloablative conditioning. Incidences of ≥grade 3 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and extensive chronic GVHD were 9% and 3%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 17.4 months (range, 6.9–29.1), estimated relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 71.1%, 49.4%, and 66.2%, respectively. Of 33 patients who underwent alloHCT, 2-year RFS, EFS, and OS rate were 70.5%, 60.0%, and 83.2%, respectively. Achievement of MCR and DI of nilotinib were not associated with outcome. Conclusion: Nilotinib was tolerable in combination with intensive chemotherapy for adult patients with Ph+ ALL, and the outcomes were comparable to previous results based on imatinib combination. Patient recruitment is ongoing currently based on this interim analysis, and the final results are expected in 2014. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Nilotinib is used as 'off-label drug' for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia in this trial. We have achieved the permission for the use of this drug in this clinical trial from the Korean FDA.

Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®) in Patients (pts) with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Who Are Imatinib-Resistant (im-r) or -Intolerant (im-i): Updated Results from the CA180-015 ‘START-L’ Study.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 286-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herve Dombret ◽  
O.G. Ottmann ◽  
G. Rosti ◽  
B. Simonsson ◽  
R.A. Larson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Median Duration ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cytogenetic Response ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematologic Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Abstract Dasatinib (SPRYCEL®, formerly BMS-354825) is a novel, oral, multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC. Relapsing pts with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph(+) ALL) who have been previously treated with chemotherapy including im have a very poor prognosis. START-L is an open label, multi-center, global phase-II study, which treated 46 im-r or im-i pts with Ph(+) ALL from January through June 2005. Dasatinib was given orally, 70 mg twice daily (BID) with escalation to 100 mg BID for poor response or reductions to 50 mg and 40 mg BID for toxicity. Response was assessed on weekly blood counts and monthly bone marrow exams, including cytogenetics. Mutation analysis was conducted at baseline and at end of study. Quantitative PCR was carried out pretreatment and at the time of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). At the time of this update, all 46 pts had a minimum of 9 months (mo) of follow-up. Of these, 44 (96%) were im-r; due to the small number of im-i pts, data for all pts are presented. 59% of patients were male and median age was 48 years. The median time from initial Ph(+) ALL diagnosis to first dose was 18 mo. All patients had been pretreated with im including 46% with 600 mg per day or more, and 52% whose duration of im treatment was more than 12 mo. 37% of the pts had received a stem cell transplant. At baseline, 67% of pts had WBC <2000/mm3, 74% had platelets <100 × 103/mm3, and 24% had extramedullary disease outside of the spleen. In the 40 pts with baseline mutation data, im-resistant BCR-ABL mutations were observed in 78%, one with T315I. The median duration of therapy was 3.0 mo (range 0.03–16.5) for all pts and was 13.0 mo (9.2–16.5) for pts still on study. The overall complete hematologic response rate was 35%. The major cytogenetic response was 57%, including 54% CCyR. The major hematologic response (MHR) in the 31 pts with baseline mutations was 45%. The median duration of MHR was 11 mo and the median progression-free survival was 3.7 mo (95% CI 1.6–6.1). Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 13% and 67%, respectively and grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 27% and 52% of pts, respectively. Most frequent non-hematologic toxicities included diarrhea in 30% (grade 3–4, 7%), nausea in 22% (no grade 3–4), pyrexia in 22% (grade 3–4, 2%), and pleural effusion in 22% (grade 3–4, 7%) of pts. Dose was reduced in 30% and interrupted in 43% of pts, primarily due to non-hematologic toxicities. Dasatinib has important efficacy in this Ph(+) ALL pt population. Updated efficacy (including molecular response), safety, and mutational analysis data will be presented at the meeting.

Imatinib combined with induction or consolidation chemotherapy in patients with de novo Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the GRAAPH-2003 study

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 1408-1413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne de Labarthe ◽  
Philippe Rousselot ◽  
Françoise Huguet-Rigal ◽  
Eric Delabesse ◽  
Francis Witz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Trials ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

AbstractThe combination of imatinib with chemotherapy has been recently reported as very promising in patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). During 2004 and 2005, 45 patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL were treated in the Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAAPH) 2003 study, in which imatinib was started with HAM (mitoxantrone with intermediate-dose cytarabine) consolidation in good early responders (corticosensitive and chemosensitive ALL) or earlier during the induction course in combination with dexamethasone and vincristine in poor early responders (corticoresistant and/or chemoresistant ALL). Imatinib was then continuously administered until stem cell transplantation (SCT). Overall, complete remission (CR) and BCR-ABL real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) negativity rates were 96% and 29%, respectively. All of the 22 CR patients (100%) with a donor actually received allogeneic SCT in first CR. At 18 months, the estimated cumulative incidence of relapse, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 30%, 51%, and 65%, respectively. These 3 end points compared very favorably with results obtained in the pre-imatinib LALA-94 trial. This study confirms the value of the combined approach and encourages prospective trials to define the optimal chemotherapy that has to be combined with imatinib and to carefully reevaluate the place of allogeneic SCT in this new context.

scholarly journals A Phase 2 Study of Ruxolitinib with Chemotherapy in Children with Philadelphia Chromosome-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (INCB18424-269/AALL1521): Dose-Finding Results from the Part 1 Safety Phase

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 555-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah K. Tasian ◽  
Albert Assad ◽  
Deborah S Hunter ◽  
Yining Du ◽  
Mignon L. Loh
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Multi Agent

Abstract Background: Philadelphia chromosome-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph-like ALL) is a high-risk subtype occurring in 15-30% of older children and adolescents/young adults (AYAs) with B-ALL. Ph-like ALL is associated with high relapse rates and poor survival despite intensive multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy. Development of successful treatment strategies to decrease relapse and improve cure rates in patients with Ph-like ALL remains a major therapeutic gap. Rearrangements of cytokine receptor-like factor 2 (CRLF2-R) with frequent concomitant JAK2 point mutations occur in 50% of Ph-like ALL cases and induce constitutive JAK/STAT and other kinase signaling. An additional 15-20% of Ph-like ALL harbors other JAK pathway alterations, such as JAK2 or EPOR rearrangements, that similarly activate JAK/STAT signaling. Ruxolitinib is a potent, selective JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor with demonstrated activity in preclinical Ph-like ALL models and clinical safety as monotherapy in children with relapsed/refractory cancers. We report the initial safety of ruxolitinib in combination with post-induction chemotherapy in children and AYAs with newly-diagnosed high-risk (HR) Ph-like ALL with CRLF2-R or other JAK pathway alterations treated on the non-randomized, 2-part phase 2 study INCB18424-269 (AALL1521; NCT02723994). Methods: Patients aged 1-21 years at time of diagnosis with HR B-ALL and eligible Ph-like genetic lesions who had completed 4-drug induction chemotherapy as per the Children's Oncology Group (COG) AALL1131 study (NCT02883049) were eligible to participate. Patients were stratified into 4 cohorts by genetic alterations and end-induction flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) status: cohort A = CRLF2-R JAK-mutant, MRD+; B = CRLF2-R JAK-wild-type, MRD+; C = other JAK pathway alterations, MRD+, D = any CRLF2-R or JAK pathway alteration, MRD-. Patients commenced treatment on the INCB18424-269/AALL1521 study at consolidation with ruxolitinib orally twice daily in combination with augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (aBFM) post-induction chemotherapy as per AALL1131. Five discontinuous dose levels (10-50 mg/m2/dose 14-days-on/14-days-off per cycle [DL-2 to DL2]) and one continuous DL1b (40 mg/m2/dose × 28 days per cycle) of ruxolitinib with aBFM chemotherapy were explored via a standard rolling 6 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed through Day 29 of delayed intensification (DI) and defined as hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity with higher grade or more prolonged duration than observed in children with treated with identical chemotherapy (without ruxolitinib) on other COG HR B-ALL trials. Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses were conducted using serial blood samples obtained from patients during consolidation therapy. Results: Forty patients (pts) were enrolled in Part 1 (cohort A, n=10; B, n=9; C, n=5; D, n=16). Four patients discontinued study treatment before the Day 29 DI timepoint, 3 of whom were replaced. Patients had a median age of 14 years, and 67.5% were male. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in all patients and included anemia (75%), platelet count decrease and/or thrombocytopenia (65%), febrile neutropenia (72.5%), and AST or ALT increase (57.5%). Thirty-three patients had Grade 3/4 events deemed possibly related to ruxolitinib without identified DLTs. Eleven patients in Part 1 (27.5%) discontinued study therapy for various reasons: CNS relapse (2 pts), end-consolidation MRD+ (4 pts), multi-system organ dysfunction (MSOD; 2 pts), elective MRD- stem cell transplantation (1 pt), psychosocial/compliance issues (2 pts). One patient died of septic shock and MSOD not attributed to ruxolitinib. Preliminary analysis of plasma drug levels at 4 hours post-dose was consistent with the known PK profile of ruxolitinib. PD studies demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition of target phosphoproteins and, importantly, sustained inhibition of phosphorylated STAT5 with continuous ruxolitinib dosing at DL1b. Discussion: These findings demonstrate safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib in combination with intensive multi-agent chemotherapy in children and AYAs with newly-diagnosed HR CRLF2-R/JAK pathway-mutant Ph-like ALL and support continued investigation of treatment efficacy in Part 2 of this trial. Disclosures Tasian: Aleta Biopharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Assad:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hunter:Incyte Corporation: Employment. Du:Incyte Corporation: Employment.

scholarly journals Dasatinib Plus Intensive Chemotherapy in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Children’s Oncology Group Trial AALL0622

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (22) ◽  
pp. 2306-2314 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Slayton ◽  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
John A. Kairalla ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
Xinlei Mi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Cranial Irradiation ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Purpose Addition of imatinib to intensive chemotherapy improved survival for children and young adults with Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Compared with imatinib, dasatinib has increased potency, CNS penetration, and activity against imatinib-resistant clones. Patients and Methods Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trial AALL0622 (Bristol Myers Squibb trial CA180-204) tested safety and feasibility of adding dasatinib to intensive chemotherapy starting at induction day 15 in patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia age 1 to 30 years. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) was recommended for patients at high risk based on slow response and for those with a matched family donor regardless of response after at least 11 weeks of therapy. Patients at standard risk based on rapid response received chemotherapy plus dasatinib for an additional 120 weeks. Patients with overt CNS leukemia received cranial irradiation. Results Sixty eligible patients were enrolled. Five-year overall (OS) and event-free survival rates (± standard deviations [SD]) were 86% ± 5% and 60% ± 7% overall, 87% ± 5% and 61% ± 7% for standard-risk patients (n = 48; 19% underwent HSCT), and 89% ± 13% and 67% ± 19% for high-risk patients (n = 9; 89% underwent HSCT), respectively. Five-year cumulative incidence (± SD) of CNS relapse was 15% ± 6%. Outcomes (± SDs) were similar to those in COG AALL0031, which used the same chemotherapy with continuous imatinib: 5-year OS of 81% ± 6% versus 86% ± 5% ( P = .63) and 5-year disease-free survival of 68% ± 7% versus 60% ± 7% ( P = 0.31) for AALL0031 versus AALL0622, respectively. IKZF1 deletions, present in 56% of tested patients, were associated with significantly inferior OS and event-free survival overall and in standard-risk patients. Conclusion Dasatinib was well tolerated with chemotherapy and provided outcomes similar to those with imatinib in COG AALL0031, where all patients received cranial irradiation. Our results support limiting HSCT to slow responders and suggest a potential role for transplantation in rapid responders with IKZF1 deletions.

scholarly journals Improved Early Event-Free Survival With Imatinib in Philadelphia Chromosome–Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Children's Oncology Group Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (31) ◽  
pp. 5175-5181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirk R. Schultz ◽  
W. Paul Bowman ◽  
Alexander Aledo ◽  
William B. Slayton ◽  
Harland Sather ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Early Event ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Event Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Improved Outcome ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Purpose Imatinib mesylate is a targeted agent that may be used against Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), one of the highest risk pediatric ALL groups. Patients and Methods We evaluated whether imatinib (340 mg/m2/d) with an intensive chemotherapy regimen improved outcome in children ages 1 to 21 years with Ph+ ALL (N = 92) and compared toxicities to Ph− ALL patients (N = 65) given the same chemotherapy without imatinib. Exposure to imatinib was increased progressively in five patient cohorts that received imatinib from 42 (cohort 1; n = 7) to 280 continuous days (cohort 5; n = 50) before maintenance therapy. Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) –identical sibling donors underwent blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) with imatinib given for 6 months following BMT. Results Continuous imatinib exposure improved outcome in cohort 5 patients with a 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of 80% ± 11% (95% CI, 64% to 90%), more than twice historical controls (35% ± 4%; P < .0001). Three-year EFS was similar for patients in cohort 5 treated with chemotherapy plus imatinib (88% ± 11%; 95% CI, 66% to 96%) or sibling donor BMT (57% ± 22%; 95% CI, 30.4% to 76.1%). There were no significant toxicities associated with adding imatinib to intensive chemotherapy. The higher imatinib dosing in cohort 5 appears to improve survival by having an impact on the outcome of children with a higher burden of minimal residual disease after induction. Conclusion Imatinib plus intensive chemotherapy improved 3-year EFS in children and adolescents with Ph+ ALL, with no appreciable increase in toxicity. BMT plus imatinib offered no advantage over BMT alone. Additional follow-up is required to determine the impact of this treatment on long-term EFS and determine whether chemotherapy plus imatinib can replace BMT.

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Blinatumomab and Concurrent Oral Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy As Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy for Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Following Chemotherapy-Sparing Induction

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 45-45
Author(s):  
Mark B. Geyer ◽  
Amber C. King ◽  
Justin C. O'Brien ◽  
Jae H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Multi Agent ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome Positive

Background: Combining oral ABL-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with (w/) multi-agent chemotherapy has improved the long-term disease-free survival of adults w/ Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). However, Ph+ ALL occurs more commonly in older adults, and toxicities of multi-agent chemotherapy, including sequelae of prolonged myelosuppression, are amplified in this population. Others have previously reported rates of morphologic complete response (mCR) approaching 100% among adults w/ Ph+ ALL treated w/ corticosteroids (CS) and dasatinib (DAS) alone as induction therapy, but w/ low rates of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity by flow cytometry (FACS) and BCR-ABL1 PCR (complete molecular response, CMR) and high rates of relapse in the absence of further consolidation. The bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab (BLIN) has considerable efficacy in clearing MRD in patients (pts) w/ Ph- B-cell ALL. We have previously reported our institutional experience combining ABL TKIs w/ BLIN in pts w/ Ph+ ALL and MRD, including encouraging safety data and high rates of MRD eradication (King/Geyer et al., Leuk Res, 2019). The ongoing D-ALBA study (GIMEMA LAL2116) is also investigating BLIN + DAS consolidation following 12 weeks of induction (prednisone + DAS followed by DAS), w/out protocol-specified maintenance, and has demonstrated preliminary evidence of efficacy (Chiaretti et al., ASH Meeting, 2019). As such, we designed a phase II study of BLIN as part of a chemotherapy sparing strategy in pts w/ Ph+ ALL (BLISSPHALL), introducing BLIN as early as 6 weeks into treatment for pts in morphologic CR, w/ aim of enhancing early MRD negativity and suppressing resistant clones early in disease course. Study design and methods: Our institution is leading a phase II trial of TKI + BLIN consolidation and maintenance in adults w/ newly-diagnosed Ph+ ALL, w/ potential multicenter expansion (NCT04329325). Pts are eligible if they are ≥18 years-old w/ Ph+ ALL confirmed by cytogenetic or molecular studies, ECOG performance status 0-2, w/out prior therapy for ALL beyond CS, hydroxyurea, or intrathecal chemotherapy, w/out known active extramedullary disease and/or CNS-3 disease, and w/ appropriate organ function. See Figure 1: pts will receive a CS pre-phase (days [d] -6 - 0) followed by modified GIMEMA LAL1205 induction (dexamethasone [DEX] 10 mg/m2 [max 24 mg/d], d1-24, tapered off d25-32) + DAS 140 mg/d (dose adjustments or TKI change permitted per protocol) w/ intrathecal methotrexate (IT MTX) d22, 43 and bone marrow (BM) assessments including FACS and BCR-ABL1 PCR. Pts in mCR on d43 (or optional reassessment ≤ 3 weeks later) will be eligible to proceed to consolidation w/ 3 cycles (C) BLIN 28 mcg/d IVCI, d1-28, concurrent w/ TKI, w/ 14d off BLIN between cycles and BM MRD assessment/IT MTX after each cycle. C1 BLIN + TKI is required to begin inpatient x72 hours. TKI is given continuously including between BLIN cycles. Pts in CMR after consolidation may proceed to maintenance (C4-7 BLIN + TKI, 28d off between cycles). Pts may come off study to proceed to hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) at any point, though it is recommended such pts receive ≥2C of BLIN + TKI. The primary objective is to determine the proportion of evaluable pts achieving CMR by the end of consolidation (≤ 3C BLIN + TKI). Secondary objectives include safety/toxicity of BLIN + DAS, duration of CMR, incidence of relapse, event-free/overall survival. Exploratory objectives include safety/toxicity of non-DAS TKIs + BLIN, defining patterns/mechanisms of resistance to BLIN+TKI (including ABL kinase mutations), and outcomes among pts not undergoing HCT. The trial utilizes a Simon's minimax two-stage design; 20% CMR rate is considered not promising, a 50% CMR rate is considered promising, and probabilities of type I/II error are set at 0.10/0.10. If ≥ 3 of the first 10 pts achieve CMR we will continue enrollment to max 17 pts. If ≥ 6 pts achieve CMR, then BLIN + TKI will be considered promising for further investigation. The investigators are hopeful this study will add to the currently limited prospective data supporting TKI + BLIN consolidation/maintenance for pts w/ Ph+ ALL and efforts to develop chemotherapy-sparing and immunotherapeutic strategies for older pts w/ ALL. Disclosures Geyer: Amgen: Research Funding. King:Abbvie: Other: advisory board. Park:Novartis: Consultancy; Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Intellia: Consultancy; Artiva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy, Research Funding; Minverva: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Blinatumomab is not approved to be given in combination with ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors for treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Nilotinib Combined With Multi-Agent Chemotherapy For Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Final Results Of Prospective Multicenter Phase 2 Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 55-55
Author(s):  
Dae-Young Kim ◽  
Young Don Joo ◽  
Sung-Doo Kim ◽  
Jung-Hee Lee ◽  
Je-Hwan Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Multi Agent

Abstract We previously reported the interim analysis on the clinical outcome of nilotinib (Tasigna®, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland), when combined with multi-agent chemotherapy for newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ALL) in adults. Herein, we reported the final results of the multicenter prospective phase2 trial of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Working Party, the Korean Society of Hematology. Newly diagnosed Ph+ALL patients aged 18 years old or more were eligible when they had adequate organ function. Diagnosis of Ph+ALL was performed via confirmation of the presence of Ph chromosome by conventional GTL-band technique, and/or positive molecular analysis with nested RT PCR for detection of BCR-ABL fusion transcripts. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. All patients received induction treatment consisting of vincristine, daunorubicin, oral or parenteral prednisolone, and nilotinib. After achieving complete remission (CR), subjects received either 5 courses of consolidation followed by 2-year maintenance with nilotinib, or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) depending on the donor availability, his/her tolerability, and patient’s wish. Nilotinib was administered twice a day with a single dose of 400mg (800mg per day) from day8 of induction until the initiation of conditioning for alloHCT or the end of maintenance therapy. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring was performed at the central lab with quantitative RT-PCR assays for peripheral blood BCR-ABL RNA using LightCycler® Technology in serial; at the time of diagnosis, at hematologic CR(HCR), and every 3 months thereafter. BCR-ABL quantification was expressed relative to the amount of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) mRNA. The molecular response was defined as complete (MCR, MRD-negative) if the BCR-ABL/G6PDH ratio was less than 1x10-6. Toxicity was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). Subjects had been followed up for 2 years after alloHCT or during maintenance therapy. Data were frozen up in June, 2013. A total of 91 subjects (male: female = 45: 46) were enrolled onto the study between January 2009 and May 2012. The median age was 47 (range 18-71) years old. Type of BCR breakpoint was minor (e1a2) in 71% of patients. The median BCR-ABL/G6PDH ratio was 6.09 (bone marrow) and 3.28 (peripheral blood) at diagnosis. During induction, all subjects required blood product transfusion, and incidence of nonhematologic adverse events (AE) over grade 3 was 17% (jaundice), 18% (ALT elevation), 13% (lipase elevation), and 2% (pancreatitis). Neither QTc prolongation over 500ms nor significant arrhythmia happened among any subject and any cycle. HCR rate was 90% and median time to HCR was 27 days (range, 13-72); most of failure was due to death in aplasia (n=8). MCR rate at HCR was 55%, Cumulative MCR rate was 84%, and median time to MCR was 1.1 months (range, 0.6-15.8). Most common cause of dropout from study was treatment-related death (n=22; during induction/consolidation vs. after alloHCT = 12 vs. 10), and HREL (n=15). Nilotinib was interrupted 75 times among 64 subjects, reduced 14 times among 12 subjects, and discontinued permanently due to hematologic relapse (HREL, n=14), AE (n=6, over gr3:3), and other cause (n=2). Fifty nine patients underwent alloHCT, 34 with myeloablative and 25 with reduced-intensity conditioning. Incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD were 41% and 29%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 20.7 months of surviving subjects, estimated hematologic relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) rate at 2 years were 74% and 70%, respectively. Among subject achieving MCR, 2-year molecular RFS rate was 56%. When events were defined as ‘dropout due to AE, isolated molecular / extramedullary relapse, HREL, and death from any cause’, median event-free survival was 12.5 months. In this prospective study, nilotinib was shown to be effective for adult Ph+ALL, and concurrent administration of nilotinib with cytotoxic drug was well-tolerable, although death in aplasia during induction was the most common cause of failure of achieving HCR. In terms of MRD, potential of nilotinib to achieve and maintain MRD negativity were satisfactory (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00844298). Disclosures: Off Label Use: Nilotinib for Ph+ALL-sientific and academic purpose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document