AMC-085: A Pilot Trial of AVD and Brentuximab Vedotin in the Upfront Treatment of Stage II-IV HIV-Associated Hodgkin Lymphoma. A Trial of the AIDS Malignancy Consortium

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1526-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Rubinstein ◽  
Page Moore ◽  
David H. Henry ◽  
Lee Ratner ◽  
Elad Sharon ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Patients (pts) infected with HIV have a 6-8 fold increased risk of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Incidence may have increased with the implementation of combined anti-retroviral therapy (cART) in the mid 1990s. Frontline therapy for HIV-associated cHL (HIV-cHL) using, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in the pre-cART era showed a 2 year overall survival (OS) of 48%, but outcomes are currently similar to the non-HIV population. Pts with advanced disease have a 30% chance of relapse with ABVD. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 an antibody drug conjugate that selectively induces apoptosis of CD30+ cells with a complete response of 34% in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL. An international trial of BV with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) vs. ABVD is ongoing. Here we present the phase I portion of the first trial using BV with AVD in the upfront treatment of HIV-cHL. The Phase II portion is actively accruing in both the United States and France as part of an AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC)/Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) collaboration. Methods: The Phase I was a 3+3 dose de-escalation design evaluating 3 dose levels of BV (1.2 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg, and 0.6 mg/kg) every 2 weeks combined with standard, fixed doses of doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 (AVD) in a 28 day cycle. Eligibility: HIV+ pts diagnosed with untreated cHL stage II-IV with CD4 counts ≥50 cells/mm3 were required to take cART regimens for at least 1 week before treatment. Ritonavir, zidovidine, and cobisistat were excluded. Baseline, cycle 2, and post treatment PET/CT scans were required. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined during cycle 1. Results: Sixpts (5 men and 1 woman) were treated in the phase I portion from 3/2013-5/2015. Staging: II (n=1), III (n=1) IV (n=4). Pathology: mixed cellularity (n=2), nodular sclerosis (n=3), and lymphocyte depleted/mixed cellularity (n=1) HIV-cHL. The median CD4 T cell count at lymphoma diagnosis was 499 cells/mm3 (range 86-784) and the median viral load was 44 copies/ml (range 20-77). No cycle 1 DLTs were identified in the first 6 eligible patients and only 3 grade 3 adverse events in later cycles were noted, pneumonia, n=1, and neuropathy n=2, and neutropenia, n=1. In 2 pts, toxicity required delays in therapy of over 3 weeks (after c5d1 and after c6d1) resulting in subject removal from further protocol therapy. One pt had a decrease in the diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) to 65% after cycle 2, and BV was withheld while AVD continued as per protocol. Two pts were later deemed ineligible, and excluded from any analysis, due to the concomitant use of ritonavir-based cART at enrollment. Both developed febrile neutropenia and one developed a grade 3 pancreatitis during cycle 1, emphasizing the importance of not treating patients with BV + AVD with concurrent CYP3A4 inhibitors. Five of the 6 pts achieved cycle 2 PET/CT negativity as defined by a Deauville score 1-3. The PET/CT positive patient ultimately had a negative post-therapy scan. The 5 pts who completed therapy achieved CR post-therapy, and one patient has yet to complete treatment. Phase II is enrolling at BV 1.2 mg/kg in combination with AVD. Conclusions: AVD-BV in stage II-IV HIV-cHL was well-tolerated therapy as no DLT were identified. Five of the 6 patients achieved a negative C2 PET/CT and 5/5 of the patients who completed therapy thus far achieved a CR. The recommended Phase II dose is 1.2 mg/kg +AVD every other week. The phase II portion (51 subjects) is actively accruing in both the USA and France, in an AMC/LYSA collaboration, clinicaltrials.gov NCT01771107. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 582-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Garcia-Sanz ◽  
Anna Sureda ◽  
Sara Alonso-Alvarez ◽  
Ana Pilar Gonzalez ◽  
Antonia Rodriguez ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Around 30% of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients are refractory or relapse (RR) after first line therapy. Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and with Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation (APBSCT) can cure many patients, but those who are transplanted with active disease detectable by PET-CT have a very poor prognosis. Therefore, the current challenge in HL is to improve the results of the pre-transplant chemotherapy. Phase 2 single agent trials with Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) in highly RRHL patients have demonstrated overall and complete response rates of 75% and 34%, respectively (Younes, JCO 2012; 30:2183); as 2nd line, BV has provided very promising results in combination with chemotherapy (LaCasce, Blood 2014; 124(21):3099) Objectives: We conducted a phase I/II trial to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and response rate with combined Brentuximab vedotin with ESHAP chemotherapy [BRESHAP] as 2nd line therapy for RRHL prior to APBSCT (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02243436). Methods: The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of complete responses (CR) pre-APBSCT. It is a phase I-II trial with dose escalation followed by expansion. Treatment consisted of Etoposide (40 mg/m2/day IV, D1-4), Solumedrol (250 mg/day IV, D1-4), High dose AraC (2 g/m2 IV, D5) and cisPlatin (25 mg/m2/day IV, D1-4). BV was administered at three dose levels: 0.9, 1.2 or 1.8 mg/kg IV on day 1 to each cohort of patients, following the scheme of cohorts of 3 patients each, to assess the maximum tolerable dose (MTD). The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade 4 hematologic toxicity extended over 3 weeks or non-hematologic toxicity grade ≥3 during the first treatment cycle. Patients were evaluated weekly. Results: Patients with relapsed or refractory classical HL (cHL) after one prior line of therapy were eligible. To date, 27 patients have been included in the trial. The first 9 have completed the three courses as scheduled, without TLD doses. Fifteen patients have received the first full cycle, presenting 4 episodes of severe adverse reactions: non-neutropenic fever due to IV AraC and to complicated catheter insertion; one pneumothorax after catheter insertion; and one febrile neutropenia recovered with antibiotic treatment. Grade 4 hematologic toxicity presented in three of these nine patients: 2 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia 1. All nine patients underwent stem cell mobilization after the 1st or the 2nd treatment cycle with subcutaneous G-CSF 5 mcg/Kg days +7 to +14, collecting >2·10e6/Kg peripheral blood CD34+ cells in all cases, with no grade 3-4 toxicity. The number of harvesting procedures was one & two in seven & two patients, respectively. The transplant has been done in 6 patients, with a median of 9 days and 10 days for neutrophil and platelet recovery, respectively. All nine patients had no evidence of disease before the transplant by PET-CT, although one patient had residual FGD uptaking areas without underlying anatomical lesions on CT (metabolic complete response: 89%). Six patients have been evaluated after the APBSCT and they are all in metabolic CR. The phase II of the trial was open on April the 12th 2015, with BV at the recommended dose of 1.8 mg/kg per course. At the submission of this report, there were 28 patients recruited, and 17 evaluated pre-transplant, achieving 16 CR. The complete results will be presented during the meeting; the projected recruitment by the meeting is 45 (65% of the total planned recruitment). Conclusions: BRESHAP is a tolerable treatment scheme as remission induction prior to transplant in patients with refractory or relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma, and it offers very promising results. Disclosures Off Label Use: Brentuximab Vedotin in Resistant or Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma patients who are candidates to Autologous Stem Cell Transplant. Sureda:Seattle Genetics Inc.: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Caballero:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 736-736
Author(s):  
Luc-Matthieu Fornecker ◽  
Julien Lazarovici ◽  
Igor Aurer ◽  
Rene-Olivier Casasnovas ◽  
Anne-Claire Gac ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: About 15-20% of patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) relapse or are refractory to first-line treatment with combined modality therapies. Early assessment of metabolic response after 2 cycles of ABVD has been shown to be an accurate predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with AVD chemotherapy (BV-AVD) has demonstrated a promising efficacy with a favorable safety profile in a phase I trial for treatment-naive patients (Younes A. et al, Lancet Oncol 2013). Based on these results, we conducted a randomized, multicentric, phase II trial in order to improve the PET response rate after 2 cycles with BV-AVD regimen for previously untreated, early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, stage I/II, HL and unfavorable EORTC/LYSA criteria (defined with at least one of the following: age ≥ 50 y, bulky mediastinal mass with mediastinum / thorax ratio ≥ 0.35, number of involved nodal areas ≥ 4, ESR ≥ 50mm/h or ≥ 30mm/h with B symptoms) were enrolled at the time of diagnosis. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive 4 cycles of BV-AVD (experimental arm) or ABVD (standard arm), followed by 30Gy involved node radiation therapy (INRT). The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of the BV-AVD regimen, as measured by negative-PET rate after 2 cycles based on central review. PET was interpreted according to the Deauville 5-point scale with negative PET defined as Deauville 1-3. Patients with missing PET evaluation, whatever the reason, were considered as non-responders. The statistical hypothesis was based on an increase of 10% (from 75% to 85%) of the PET negativity rate after 2 cycles in the experimental arm. The standard arm was added in order to ensure that the hypothesis taken in the sample size evaluation (negative-PET rate after 2 cycles of ABVD ≤ 75%) was verified. If ≥ 93 patients out of 113 evaluable patients had negative-PET, the hypothesis that the negative-PET rate ≤ 75% in the experimental arm would be rejected. This planned analysis of the primary endpoint was performed by intention to treat (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02292979). Results: From March 2015 to October 2016, 170 patients were included, 113 were randomized in the BV-AVD arm and 57 in the ABVD arm. Median age at randomization was 29 y (range 18-60) and 51% were female. The median number of involved nodal areas was 3 and 92% of the patients were Ann Arbor stage II, 57% had a bulky disease and 40% had B symptoms. After 2 cycles of treatment, 93/113 patients (82.3%, 95% CI 75.3-88.0) and 43/57 (75.4%, 95% CI 64.3-84.5) achieved a negative-PET based on central review in the experimental and standard arms, respectively. With the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval superior to 75% in the experimental arm, the primary objective can be considered to be met. During the first 2 cycles, grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were documented in 74% of the patients in the BV-AVD arm and 56% in the ABVD arm. The most frequent grade 3-4 AEs in the experimental arm were neutropenia (64%), leucopenia (31%), gastro-intestinal disorders (8%), febrile neutropenia (7%), transaminases increased (4%) and infections (4%). Only 2 patients (2%) have developed a grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy after the first 2 cycles of BV-AVD. No pulmonary toxicity has been observed. Grade 3-4 serious AEs (SAEs) were documented in 19% of the patients in the experimental arm (treatment-related SAEs in 17%) and 7% in the standard arm. SAEs have led to permanent BV discontinuation in 7/113 (6%) patients during the first 2 cycles. Reasons for permanent BV discontinuation were loss of weight, hyponatremia, febrile neutropenia, epileptic seizure, peripheral neuropathy, hepatitis and cutaneous rash. Conclusion: This randomized, multicentric, open-label phase II trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BV in combination with AVD chemotherapy based on PET response after 2 cycles for previously untreated, unfavorable early-stage HL. The primary objective was met with an improvement of the negative-PET rate with BV-AVD regimen. This first analysis highlighted an increased toxicity with BV-AVD regimen compared to ABVD, with a higher rate of grade 3-4 AEs and SAEs during the first 2 cycles of treatment. Disclosures Fornecker: BMS: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Aurer: takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bonnet: Takeda: Other: advisory board. Perrot: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Specht: Takeda: Other: advisory board. Touati: Takeda: Honoraria. Stamatoullas: Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Lugtenburg: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria. Federico: takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Andre: Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4344-4344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Borchmann ◽  
Dennis A. Eichenauer ◽  
Annette Plütschow ◽  
Stefanie Kreissl ◽  
Michael Fuchs ◽  
...  

Abstract Rationale BEACOPPescalated (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) has substantially improved the outcome for patients with advanced stage Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) achieving an overall survival of 95% at five years. Although this certainly is the most important endpoint for these mainly young patients, there still is concern about the toxicities of this intensified chemotherapy regimen. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an anti-CD30 directed antibody-drug conjugate that has shown very promising single-agent activity and good tolerability in HL. We aimed at improving the toxicity profile of BEACOPPescalated while maintaining its efficacy by introducing BV (targeted BEACOPP). Methods Two modified BEACOPP regimens were developed. In a more conservative variant (BrECAPP: BV, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, procarbazine, prednisone), we replaced vincristine by BV and omitted bleomycin. In the more experimental variant (BrECADD: BV, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, dexamethasone) we additionally replaced procarbazine by dacarbazine to reduce gonadal toxicity, reduced the dose of etoposide to decrease risk of second acute myeloid leukemia while slightly increasing the dose of doxorubicin to maintain efficacy, and introduced dexamethasone (day 1-4) substituting for prednisone (day 1-14) to avoid immunosuppressive steroid treatment during neutropenia (please see table 1). Both regimens are administered q21d for 6 cycles. This is an ongoing randomized phase II study with the combined primary endpoint being the PET-based complete response rate after chemotherapy and the complete remission rate at final restaging including early follow-up. Here we report on the first 48 patients (planned n=100). Results The study started in October 2012. 48 patients have been enrolled by June 2013 and are included in this analysis. Median age is 29 years (range 19-60 years), 60% are male, and 83% have Ann-Arbor stage III or IV disease. 14 patients have been staged after 6 cycles of chemotherapy, 6 in the BrECAPP and 8 in the BrECADD arm. Four of these patients have not reached a complete response. The 95% confidence interval for the number of treatment successes is 42% to 92% and contains both the margin for failure (65%) as well as the margin for success (85%). Regarding feasibility, 6 of 15 patients (60%) with 6 cycles of chemotherapy required no dose reductions of etoposide, cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin during the entire treatment period (corresponding number for 6 cycles of BEACOPPescalated in the HD15 study: 50%). Hematological toxicity grade 3 or 4 of the targeted BEACOPP variants was documented in 26 of 32 patients (81%) with at least 1 cycle of chemotherapy documented (corresponding number for 4-6 cycles of BEACOPPescalated in the GHSG HD15 study: 91.7%), and grade 3 or 4 organ toxicity in 1 patient (3%, GHSG HD15 study: 14.1%). Four patients reported symptoms of peripheral sensory neuropathy so far (grade 1 n=2; grade 2 n=2). BV was not given in the 6th cycle in two of these patients. Conclusion These ongoing phase II trial results indicate that anti-CD30 targeted BEACOPP variants may be well feasible without compromising the efficacy associated with BEACOPPescalated. Enrollment is ongoing and updated results will be presented. Disclosures: Borchmann: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Brentuximab vedotin first line Treatment of Hodgkin´s Lymphoma. Diehl:Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Engert:Takeda: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 586-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Sawas ◽  
Joseph M. Connors ◽  
John G. Kuruvilla ◽  
Celeste Rojas ◽  
Renee Lichtenstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with HL or ALCL who have relapsed post or are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remain incurable with standard therapies. The CD30 immunoconjugate Brentuximab vedotin has become the preferred treatment for such patients. Bendamustine has also demonstrated good activity and tolerability in several lymphoma subtypes including HL. This ongoing phase I/II study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of brentuximab vedotin with bendamustine for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory HL or ALCL. We provide the phase I and II data. (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01657331). Methods Patients received an outpatient IV infusion of brentuximab vedotin on Day 1 with bendamustine on Days 1 and 2 of a 3-week cycle for up to 6 cycles. In the Phase 1 portion 4 dose levels were evaluated: (1) Bv = 1.2mg/kg; B = 70mg/m2; (2) Bv = 1.2mg/kg; B = 80mg/m2; (3) Bv = 1.8mg/kg; B = 80mg/m2; and (4) Bv = 1.8mg/kg; B = 90. Accrual followed a classic Fibonacci dose escalation, with 3 patients being treated at each dose level. Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT), defined as any CTC version 4 Grade 3 or 4 toxicity led to expansion of the dose cohort. The recommended phase II dose was Bv 1.8 mg/kg on Day 1 and B 90 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2. Response was assessed by the investigator per Cheson 2007 after cycles 2 and 6. Enrollment is ongoing of the Phase 2 portion of the study, where an additional 24 patients will be accrued. In addition, plasma and serum biomarkers are being prospectively collected for correlation with toxicity and response. Results Forty-two patients (55% male) with a median age of 37 years (range, 30-70) were enrolled. Forty-one patients had HL and 1 ALCL; the median number of prior systemic therapies was 5 (range 1-16); with 26 patients having had prior ASCT and 14 patients receiving prior radiation therapy. The predominant all grade toxicity observed with the combination was nausea (62%, grade 1-2). The observed grade 3-4 toxicities in the phase I were: neutropenia (19%), thrombocytopenia (19%), anemia (15%) and rash (11%). The observed phase II grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (14%) and pneumonia (14%). No DLT was observed at dose level 4 (Bv 1.8 mg/m2 and B 90 mg/m2). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. A decision was made not to explore further doses that exceeded the standard single agent doses of both drugs. Patient's received a median of 6 cycles (range, 1-6). To date, 36/39 patients are evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 67%, with 7 patients (19%) attaining a complete response (CR). Eight patients had stable disease. Among the 11 patients who received prior Bv, 6 responded (55%) (CR= 2, PR=4, SD=3, PD=2), and of the 4 patients who had prior B, 2 responded (50%) (PR=2, SD=1, PD=1). Two patients had received both Bv and B as single agents prior to initiation of study; one patient achieved a PR and the other experienced PD. The ALCL patient achieved a PR. Conclusion In this heavily treated population of HL and ALCL, the combination of brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg on Day 1 with bendamustine 90 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 2 of 3-week cycles represents a very effective and tolerable outpatient regimen. The regimen has an ORR of 67% with responses ≥ 50% in patients who had received either agent separately supporting the potential clinical synergy of the combination. Table. Dose Cohort No. Patients Responses Complete Response Dose Cohort 1Bv = 1.2 mg/kg B = 70 mg/m2 7 4 1 Dose Cohort 2Bv = 1.2 mg/kg B = 80 mg/m2 3 3 0 Dose Cohort 3Bv = 1.8 mg/kg B = 80 mg/m2 7 5 1 Dose Cohort 4Bv = 1.8 mg/kg B = 90 mg/m2 11 5 1 Phase IIBv = 1.8 mg/kg B = 90 mg/m2 11 7 4 Total 39 (36 evaluable) 24 (67%) 7 (19%) Disclosures Sawas: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is not approved for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma or anaplastic large T- cell lymphoma. Connors:Roche: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Kuruvilla:Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche Canada: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Neylon:Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Deng:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Amengual:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, INC: Consultancy, Research Funding. Villa:Roche: Research Funding. Crump:Sanofi: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria. O'Connor:Spectrum: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (36) ◽  
pp. 4381-4389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arend von Stackelberg ◽  
Franco Locatelli ◽  
Gerhard Zugmaier ◽  
Rupert Handgretinger ◽  
Tanya M. Trippett ◽  
...  

Purpose Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct targeting CD19 on B-cell lymphoblasts. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, recommended dosage, and potential for efficacy of blinatumomab in children with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). Methods This open-label study enrolled children < 18 years old with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL in a phase I dosage-escalation part and a phase II part, using 6-week treatment cycles. Primary end points were maximum-tolerated dosage (phase I) and complete remission rate within the first two cycles (phase II). Results We treated 49 patients in phase I and 44 patients in phase II. Four patients had dose-limiting toxicities in cycle 1 (phase I). Three experienced grade 4 cytokine-release syndrome (one attributed to grade 5 cardiac failure); one had fatal respiratory failure. The maximum-tolerated dosage was 15 µg/m2/d. Blinatumomab pharmacokinetics was linear across dosage levels and consistent among age groups. On the basis of the phase I data, the recommended blinatumomab dosage for children with relapsed/refractory ALL was 5 µg/m2/d for the first 7 days, followed by 15 µg/m2/d thereafter. Among the 70 patients who received the recommended dosage, 27 (39%; 95% CI, 27% to 51%) achieved complete remission within the first two cycles, 14 (52%) of whom achieved complete minimal residual disease response. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were anemia (36%), thrombocytopenia (21%), and hypokalemia (17%). Three patients (4%) and one patient (1%) had cytokine-release syndrome of grade 3 and 4, respectively. Two patients (3%) interrupted treatment after grade 2 seizures. Conclusion This trial, which to the best of our knowledge was the first such trial in pediatrics, demonstrated antileukemic activity of single-agent blinatumomab with complete minimal residual disease response in children with relapsed/refractory BCP-ALL. Blinatumomab may represent an important new treatment option in this setting, requiring further investigation in curative indications.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seth S Martin ◽  
David I Feldman ◽  
Roger S Blumenthal ◽  
Steven R Jones ◽  
Wendy S Post ◽  
...  

Introduction: The recent advent of smartphone-linked wearable pedometers offers a novel opportunity to promote physical activity using mobile health (mHealth) technology. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that digital activity tracking and smart (automated, real-time, personalized) texting would increase physical activity. Methods: mActive (NCT01917812) was a 5-week, blinded, sequentially-randomized, parallel group trial that enrolled patients at an academic preventive cardiovascular center in Baltimore, MD, USA from January 17 th to May 20 th , 2014. Eligible patients were 18-69 year old smartphone users who reported low leisure-time physical activity by a standardized survey. After establishing baseline activity during a 1-week blinded run-in, we randomized 2:1 to unblinded or blinded tracking in phase I (2 weeks), then randomized unblinded participants 1:1 to receive or not receive smart texts in phase II (2 weeks). Smart texts provided automated, personalized, real-time coaching 3 times/day towards a daily goal of 10,000 steps. The primary outcome was change in daily step count. Results: Forty-eight patients (22 women, 26 men) enrolled with a mean (SD) age of 58 (8) years, body mass index of 31 (6), and baseline daily step count of 9670 (4350). The phase I change in activity was non-significantly higher in unblinded participants versus blinded controls by 1024 steps/day (95% CI -580-2628, p=0.21). In phase II, smart text receiving participants increased their daily steps over those not receiving texts by 2534 (1318-3750, p<0.001) and over blinded controls by 3376 (1951-4801, p<0.001). The unblinded-texts group had the highest proportion attaining the 10,000 steps/day goal (p=0.02) (Figure). Conclusions: In present-day adult smartphone users receiving preventive cardiovascular care in the United States, a technologically-integrated mHealth strategy combining digital tracking with automated, personalized, real-time text message coaching resulted in a large short-term increase in physical activity.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 2926-2932 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Ilson ◽  
Manjit Bains ◽  
David P. Kelsen ◽  
Eileen O’Reilly ◽  
Martin Karpeh ◽  
...  

Purpose: To identify the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly irinotecan combined with cisplatin and radiation in esophageal cancer. Patients and Methods: Nineteen patients with clinical stage II to III esophageal squamous cell or adenocarcinoma were treated on this phase I trial. Induction chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was administered for four treatments during weeks 1 to 5. Radiotherapy was delivered weeks 8 to 13 in 1.8-Gy daily fractions to a dose of 50.4 Gy. Cisplatin 30 mg/m2 and escalating-dose irinotecan (40, 50, 65, and 80 mg/m2) were administered on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 of radiotherapy. DLT was defined as a 2-week delay in radiotherapy for grade 3 to 4 toxicity. Results: Minimal toxicity was observed during chemoradiotherapy, with no grade 3 or 4 esophagitis, diarrhea, or stomatitis. DLT caused by myelosuppression was seen in two of six patients treated at the 80-mg/m2 dose level, thus irinotecan 65 mg/m2 was defined as the recommended phase II dose. Dysphagia improved or resolved after induction chemotherapy in 13 (81%) of 16 patients who reported dysphagia before therapy. Only one patient (5%) required a feeding tube. Six complete responses (32%) were observed, including four pathologic complete responses in 15 patients selected to undergo surgery (27%). Conclusion: Cisplatin, irinotecan, and concurrent radiotherapy can be administered on a convenient schedule with relatively minimal toxicity and an acceptable rate of complete response in esophageal cancer. Further phase II evaluation of this regimen is ongoing. A phase III comparison to fluorouracil or taxane-containing chemoradiotherapy should be considered.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document