NY-ESO-1 Vaccination in Combination with Decitabine for Patients with MDS Induces CD4+ and CD8+ T-Cell Responses

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2873-2873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pragya Srivastava ◽  
Junko Matsuzaki ◽  
Benjamin E. Paluch ◽  
Zachary Brumberger ◽  
Stephanie Kaufman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Cd4 T Cell ◽  
Cell Responses

Abstract Background: Identification of suitable target antigens for immunotherapy has been a challenge in patients with myeloid malignancies. NY-ESO-1 has been identified as an immunotherapeutic target in solid tumors. Its use in myeloid cancer is limited due to silencing by dense promoter hypermethylation. We and others have demonstrated that decitabine can induce expression of NY-ESO-1 in leukemia cell lines. We hypothesized that vaccination against NY-ESO-1 in combination with decitabine would be safe and result in NY-ESO-1 expression sufficient to induce NY-ESO-1 specific humoral and cellular immune responses in treatment-na•ve myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. Methods: We performed a phase I trial of NY-ESO-1 vaccine (anti-DEC-205-NY-ESO-1 fusion protein (CDX-1401) with poly-ICLC adjuvant; Celldex Therapeutics) in combination with decitabine (20 mg/m2/day x 5 days). Patients with intermediate/high-risk MDS by IPSS, > 18 years old, ECOG performance status < 2, and adequate hepatic and renal function were enrolled on an IRB-approved protocol (median age 64y). Patients with uncontrolled medical illness, HIV-positivity, auto-immunity or recent corticosteroid/radiation therapy were excluded. All patients signed informed consent and were treated in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients were vaccinated on day -14, received decitabine on day 1 and were re-vaccinated on day 14 of each cycle. Four cycles of therapy were planned. Peripheral blood was obtained pre-treatment, twice weekly, and at end of treatment (EOT). CD11b+ myeloid cells were isolated from each sample. Immune monitoring was performed at baseline and at EOT. An interim analysis, pre-specified in the protocol for the first 6 patients, was planned for safety and immunology endpoints. Three additional patients enrolled to an expansion cohort to ensure sufficient power for correlative studies remain on treatment. Results: Analysis of the initial safety cohort showed no unexpected toxicities. The most frequent adverse events were related to decitabine and included cytopenias (predominantly grades 3/4), elevated liver enzymes (grade 3), fatigue (grade 2), edema (grade 2/3) and diarrhea (grade 1/2). Two patients did not complete four cycles of therapy due to serious adverse events; 1 patient with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) developed in-stent restenosis and recurrent MI; a second patient suffered a terminal intracranial hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia (deemed decitabine related). LINE-1 (surrogate for global methylation) and NY-ESO-1 promoter methylation in the CD11b+ myeloid population were serially quantified for the first 2 patients by bisulfite pyrosequencing. The methylation nadir for LINE-1 and NY-ESO-1 occurred between days 8 and 15 of each decitabine cycle. Changes in LINE-1 and NY-ESO-1 methylation were correlated for each patient (R2 = 0.95, p < 0.001). Expression of NY-ESO-1 mRNA (by nested RT-PCR) was performed on CD11b+ cells from days 0, 8, 15, and 22 of the first cycle for these two patients. Patient 1 exhibited NY-ESO-1 mRNA on days 8 and 15. Patient 2 did not show any NY-ESO-1 expression. Of the first 6 patients analyzed, none showed baseline humoral immunity to NY-ESO-1 and seroconversion was observed in one subject (Table 1). Five patients had induced NY-ESO-1 specific CD4+ T-cell responses and 4 patients had NY-ESO-1 specific CD8+ T-cell responses following vaccination. Table 1. Response to Vaccination. T cell response assessed by ELISPOT for IFN-g and scored after subtracting background. Numbers in parentheses indicate number of epitopes recognized by T cells. Bold type indicates responses induced or enhanced by vaccination. Patient ID Antibody response CD4+ T cell response CD8+ T cell response Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post 1 - + ++ (2) +++ (3) - (0) + (1) 2 - - - (0) + (2) - (0) - (0) 3 - - - (0) + (2) - (0) + (1) 4 - - - (0) + (1) - (0) - (0) 5 - - - (0) + (1) - (0) + (2) 6 - - + (1) - (0) - (0) ++ (3) Conclusion: Vaccination against NY-ESO-1 is safe in combination with decitabine. Circulating myeloid cells exhibited decreased NY-ESO-1 promoter methylation. 1 of 2 sampled patients demonstrated induction of NY-ESO-1 mRNA in the myeloid compartment. Vaccination successfully induced CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses in a majority of patients. These data indicate that vaccination against NY-ESO-1 in combination with decitabine is feasible, opening the door for future studies targeting this induced antigen in MDS. Disclosures Wang: Immunogen: Research Funding. Griffiths:Celgene: Honoraria; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Astex: Research Funding.

Analysis of EBV-Specific T Cell Responses in Transplant Recipients with PTLD.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1915-1915
Author(s):  
Kathrin Sebelin ◽  
Antje Meier ◽  
Matthias Papp-Vary ◽  
Stefan Oertel ◽  
Antonio Pezzutto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Cd4 T Cell ◽  
Cell Responses

Abstract EBV causes a chronic infection in >95 % of the population and despite its strong growth transforming capacity the majority of EBV infected individuals remain asymptomatic. In contrary, in immunosuppressed patients (pts) the risk of EBV reactivation and development of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is high. This is assumed to be due to a defective T cell response. Here we analyzed the EBV-specific CD8 and CD4 T cell response to different EBV latent and lytic antigens in pts with newly diagnosed PTLD. A prospective study of 10 pts after solid organ transplantation at time of diagnosis of PTLD was performed. EBV-specific CD8 T cells were examined by flow cytometric analysis using HLA-A2, HLA-B7 and HLA-B8 restricted tetramers incorporating BMLF1 (lytic), EBNA3 and LMP2 (both latent)-derived peptides. Staining was done in conjunction with mAbs against CD8 and CCR7. The ability of CD8 T cells to produce IFN-γ in response to the same EBV-derived peptides was measured by cytokine secretion assay. In healthy, EBV+ donors, we previously have found a consistent CD4 T cell response to the latent EBV antigen EBNA1. Therefore, EBNA1-specific CD4 T cell responses were monitored for IFN-g / IL-4 secretion after protein stimulation. T cell analysis was combined with EBV-DNA quantiation by real time PCR. We found EBV-specific CD8 T cell responses at low frequency in most pts with PTLD (8/10). Half of the pts showed low frequency EBNA1 specific CD4+ T cell responses. All pts with an EBNA1 specific CD4 T cell response showed an EBV-specific CD8 T cell response. In 2/10 pts we found no EBV-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses and both pts died under initial therapy. EBV-viral load was found to inversely correlate to absolute CD4 T cell counts. In comparison to healthy normal donors, no significant differences in EBV-specific T cell response could be observed. However, pts EBV-specific T cells were decreased in comparison to pts with high EBV viral load after TX and no PTLD as well as in comparison to pts with infectious mononucleosis. These results indicate that impairment of EBV-specific T cells is not due to clonal depletion, but rather seems to be due to impaired functional activation and expansion. We therefore conclude that pts with PTLD have an inadequatly low EBV-specific T cell responses which correlates to a low absolute CD4 T cell count. We propose a combined immunomonitoring of EBV viral load, absolute CD4 T cell count and EBV-specific T cell enumeration in pts at risk for development of PTLD. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of EBV-specific T cell monitoring in immunosuppressed pts for prediction of PTLD and the potential usefulness of T cell monitoring as a prognostic marker in PTLD.

scholarly journals Role of Thymic Output in Regulating CD8 T-Cell Homeostasis during Acute and Chronic Viral Infection

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (15) ◽  
pp. 9419-9429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole E. Miller ◽  
Jennifer R. Bonczyk ◽  
Yumi Nakayama ◽  
M. Suresh
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Lcmv Infection

ABSTRACT Although it is well documented that CD8 T cells play a critical role in controlling chronic viral infections, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of CD8 T-cell responses are not well understood. Using the mouse model of an acute and chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) infection, we have examined the relative importance of peripheral T cells and thymic emigrants in the elicitation and maintenance of CD8 T-cell responses. Virus-specific CD8 T-cell responses were compared between mice that were either sham thymectomized or thymectomized (Thx) at ∼6 weeks of age. In an acute LCMV infection, thymic deficiency did not affect either the primary expansion of CD8 T cells or the proliferative renewal and maintenance of virus-specific lymphoid and nonlymphoid memory CD8 T cells. Following a chronic LCMV infection, in Thx mice, although the initial expansion of CD8 T cells was normal, the contraction phase of the CD8 T-cell response was exaggerated, which led to a transient but striking CD8 T-cell deficit on day 30 postinfection. However, the virus-specific CD8 T-cell response in Thx mice rebounded quickly and was maintained at normal levels thereafter, which indicated that the peripheral T-cell repertoire is quite robust and capable of sustaining an effective CD8 T-cell response in the absence of thymic output during a chronic LCMV infection. Taken together, these findings should further our understanding of the regulation of CD8 T-cell homeostasis in acute and chronic viral infections and might have implications in the development of immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Listeria Monocytogenes: A Model Pathogen Continues to Refine Our Knowledge of the CD8 T Cell Response

Pathogens ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhijuan Qiu ◽  
Camille Khairallah ◽  
Brian Sheridan
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Protective Immunity ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
Oral Infection ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Cell Responses

Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) infection induces robust CD8 T cell responses, which play a critical role in resolving Lm during primary infection and provide protective immunity to re-infections. Comprehensive studies have been conducted to delineate the CD8 T cell response after Lm infection. In this review, the generation of the CD8 T cell response to Lm infection will be discussed. The role of dendritic cell subsets in acquiring and presenting Lm antigens to CD8 T cells and the events that occur during T cell priming and activation will be addressed. CD8 T cell expansion, differentiation and contraction as well as the signals that regulate these processes during Lm infection will be explored. Finally, the formation of memory CD8 T cell subsets in the circulation and in the intestine will be analyzed. Recently, the study of CD8 T cell responses to Lm infection has begun to shift focus from the intravenous infection model to a natural oral infection model as the humanized mouse and murinized Lm have become readily available. Recent findings in the generation of CD8 T cell responses to oral infection using murinized Lm will be explored throughout the review. Finally, CD8 T cell-mediated protective immunity against Lm infection and the use of Lm as a vaccine vector for cancer immunotherapy will be highlighted. Overall, this review will provide detailed knowledge on the biology of CD8 T cell responses after Lm infection that may shed light on improving rational vaccine design.

scholarly journals Public T-cell epitopes shared among SARS-CoV-2 variants are presented on prevalent HLA class I alleles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia Meyer ◽  
Isaac Blaas ◽  
Ravi Chand Bollineni ◽  
Marina Delic-Sarac ◽  
Trung T Tran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Hla Class I ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Class I ◽  
T Cell Epitopes ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Cell Responses

T-cell epitopes with broad population coverage may form the basis for a new generation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. However, published studies on immunoprevalence are limited by small test cohorts, low frequencies of antigen-specific cells and lack of data correlating eluted HLA ligands with T-cell responsiveness. Here, we investigate CD8 T-cell responses to 48 peptides eluted from prevalent HLA alleles, and an additional 84 predicted binders, in a large cohort of convalescents (n=83) and pre-pandemic control samples (n=19). We identify nine conserved SARS-CoV-2 specific epitopes restricted by four of the most prevalent HLA class I alleles in Caucasians, to which responding CD8 T cells are detected in 70-100% of convalescents expressing the relevant HLA allele, including two novel epitopes. We find a strong correlation between immunoprevalence and immunodominance. Using a new algorithm, we predict that a vaccine including these epitopes would induce a T cell response in 83% of Caucasians. Significance Statement: Vaccines that induce broad T-cell responses may boost immunity as protection from current vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 is waning. From a manufacturing standpoint, and to deliver the highest possible dose of the most immunogenic antigens, it is rational to limit the number of epitopes to those inducing the strongest immune responses in the highest proportion of individuals in a population. Our data show that the CD8 T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 is more focused than previously believed. We identify nine conserved SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8 T cell epitopes restricted by four of the most prevalent HLA class I alleles in Caucasians and demonstrate that seven of these are endogenously presented.

Discordant Role of CD4 T-Cell Response Relative to Neutralizing Antibody and CD8 T-Cell Responses in Acute Hepatitis C

2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 654-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Kaplan ◽  
Kazushi Sugimoto ◽  
Kimberly Newton ◽  
Mary E. Valiga ◽  
Fusao Ikeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatitis C ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Cd4 T Cell ◽  
Acute Hepatitis C ◽  
Cell Responses

T Cell Recognition of HCMV: Pan-Genome Analysis of Immunogenic Open-Reading Frames.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 606-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis J. Picker ◽  
Andrew W. Sylwester ◽  
Bridget L. Mitchell ◽  
Cara Taormina ◽  
Christian Pelte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Cd4 T Cell ◽  
Cell Responses

Abstract Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is among the largest and most complex of known viruses with 150–200nm virions enclosing a double stranded 230kb DNA genome capable of coding for >200 proteins. HCMV infection is life-long, and for the vast majority of immune competent individuals clinically benign. Disease occurs almost exclusively in the setting of immune deficiency, suggesting that the stable host-parasite relationship that characterizes these infections is the result of an evolutionarily “negotiated” balance between viral mechanisms of pathogenesis and the host immune response. In keeping with, and perhaps because of this balance, the human CD4+ T cell response to whole HCMV viral lysates is enormous, with median peripheral blood frequencies of HCMV-specific cells ~5–10 fold higher than for analogous preparations of other common viruses. Although certain HCMV ORFs have been identified as targets of either the CD4+ or CD8+ T cell response, the specificities comprising the CD4+ T cell response, and both the total frequencies and component parts of the CD8+ T cell response are unknown. Here, we used cytokine flow cytometry and ~14,000 overlapping 15mer peptides comprising all 213 HCMV ORFs encoding proteins >100 amino acids in length to precisely define the total CD4+ and CD8+ HCMV-specific T cell responses and the HCMV ORFs responsible for these responses in 33 HCMV-seropositive, HLA-disparate donors. An additional 9 HCMV seronegative donors were similarly examined to define the extent to which non-HCMV responses cross-react with HCMV-encoded epitopes. We found that when totaled, the median frequencies of HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of the seropositive subjects were 4.0% and 4.5% for the total CD4+ or CD8+ T cell populations, respectively (which corresponds to 9.1% and 10.5% of the memory populations, respectively). The HCMV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses included a median 12 and 7 different ORFs, respectively, and all told, 73 HCMV ORFs were identified as targets for both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, 26 ORFs as targets for CD8+ T cells alone, and 43 ORFS as targets for CD4+ T cells alone. UL55, UL83, UL86, UL99, and UL122 were the HCMV ORFs most commonly recognized by CD4+ T cells; UL123, UL83, UL48, UL122 and UL28 were the HCMV ORFs most commonly recognized by CD8+ T cells. The relationship between immunogenicity and 1) HLA haplotype and 2) ORF expression and function will be discussed. HCMV-seronegative individuals were non-reactive with the vast majority of HCMV peptides. Only 7 potentially cross-reactive responses were identified (all by CD8+ T cells) to 3 ORFs (US32, US29 and UL116) out of a total of almost 4,000 potential responses, suggesting fortuitous cross-reactivity with HCMV epitopes is uncommon. These data provide the first glimpse of the total human T cell response to a complex infectious agent, and will provide insight into the rules governing immunodominance and cross-reactivity in complex viral infections of humans.

The Response to Repeated Vaccination with PR1 and WT1 Peptides Admixed in Montanide Adjuvant Is Transient and Fails to Induce Sustained Anti-Leukemia Responses in Patients with Myeloid Malignancies.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4096-4096
Author(s):  
Katayoun Rezvani ◽  
Agnes S. M. Yong ◽  
Stephan Mielke ◽  
Behnam Jafarpour ◽  
Bipin N. Savani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Gm Csf ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Ifn Γ

Abstract Abstract 4096 Poster Board III-1031 We previously demonstrated the immunogenicity of a combined vaccine approach employing two leukemia-associated antigenic peptides, PR1 and WT1 (Rezvani Blood 2008). Eight patients with myeloid malignancies received one subcutaneous 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg dose each of PR1 and WT1 vaccines in Montanide adjuvant, with 100 μg of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). CD8+ T-cell responses against PR1 or WT1 were detected in all patients as early as 1 week post-vaccination. However, responses were only sustained for 3-4 weeks. The emergence of PR1 or WT1-specific CD8+ T-cells was associated with a significant but transient reduction in minimal residual disease (MRD) as assessed by WT1 expression, suggesting a vaccine-induced anti-leukemia response. Conversely, loss of response was associated with reappearance of WT1 transcripts. We hypothesized that maintenance of sustained or at least repetitive responses may require frequent boost injections. We therefore initiated a phase 2 study of repeated vaccination with PR1 and WT1 peptides in patients with myeloid malignancies. Five patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 2 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were recruited to receive 6 injections at 2 week intervals of PR1 and WT1 in Montanide adjuvant, with GM-CSF as previously described. Six of 7 patients completed 6 courses of vaccination and follow-up as per protocol, to monitor toxicity and immunological responses. Responses to PR1 or WT1 vaccine were detected in all patients after only 1 dose of vaccine. However, additional boosting did not further increase the frequency of PR1 or WT1-specific CD8+ T-cell response. In 4/6 patients the vaccine-induced T-cell response was lost after the fourth dose and in all patients after the sixth dose of vaccine. To determine the functional avidity of the vaccine-induced CD8+ T-cell response, the response of CD8+ T-cells to stimulation with 2 concentrations of PR1 and WT1 peptides (0.1 and 10 μM) was measured by IC-IFN-γ staining. Vaccination led to preferential expansion of low avidity PR1 and WT1 specific CD8+ T-cell responses. Three patients (patients 4, 6 and 7) returned 3 months following the 6th dose of PR1 and WT1 peptide injections to receive a booster vaccine. Prior to vaccination we could not detect the presence of PR1 and WT1 specific CD8+ T-cells by direct ex-vivo tetramer and IC-IFN-γ assay or with 1-week cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT assay, suggesting that vaccination with PR1 and WT1 peptides in Montanide adjuvant does not induce memory CD8+ T-cell responses. This observation is in keeping with recent work in a murine model where the injection of minimal MHC class I binding peptides derived from self-antigens mixed with IFA adjuvant resulted in a transient effector CD8+ T cell response with subsequent deletion of these T cells and failure to induce CD8+ T cell memory (Bijker J Immunol 2007). This observation can be partly explained by the slow release of vaccine peptides from the IFA depot without systemic danger signals, leading to presentation of antigen in non-inflammatory lymph nodes by non-professional antigen presenting cells (APCs). An alternative explanation for the transient vaccine-induced immune response may be the lack of CD4+ T cell help. In summary these data support the immunogenicity of PR1 and WT1 peptide vaccines. However new approaches will be needed to induce long-term memory responses against leukemia antigens. To avoid tolerance induction we plan to eliminate Montanide adjuvant and use GM-CSF alone. Supported by observations that the in vivo survival of CD8+ T-effector cells against viral antigens are improved by CD4+ helper cells, we are currently attempting to induce long-lasting CD8+ T-cell responses to antigen by inducing CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses against class I and II epitopes of WT1 and PR1. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals DIFFERENTIAL IMMUNODOMINANCE HIERARCHY OF CD8+ T CELL RESPONSES IN HLA-B*27:05 AND B*27:02-MEDIATED CONTROL OF HIV-1 INFECTION

2017 ◽  
pp. JVI.01685-17
Author(s):  
Emily Adland ◽  
Matilda Hill ◽  
Nora Lavandier ◽  
Anna Csala ◽  
Anne Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
Selection Pressure ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Hiv Disease ◽  
Cell Responses

The well-characterised association between HLA-B*27:05 and protection against HIV disease progression has been linked to immunodominant HLA-B*27:05-restricted CD8+ T-cell responses towards the conserved Gag 263-272 (‘KK10’) and Pol 901-909 ‘KY9’ epitopes. We here studied the impact of the 3 amino acid differences between HLA-B*27:05 and the closely-related HLA-B*27:02 on the HIV-specific CD8+ T-cell response hierarchy and on immune control of HIV. Genetic epidemiological data indicate that both HLA-B*27:02 and HLA-B*27:05 associate with slower disease progression and lower viral loads. The effect of HLA-B*27:02 appears consistently stronger than that of HLA-B*27:05. In contrast to HLA-B*27:05, the immunodominant HIV-specific HLA-B*27:02-restricted CD8+ T-cell response is to a Nef epitope (residues 142-150, ‘VW9’), with Pol-KY9 subdominant and Gag-KK10 further subdominant. This selection was driven by structural differences in the F-pocket, mediated by a polymorphism between these two HLA alleles at position 81. Analysis of autologous virus sequences showed that in HLA-B*27:02-positive subjects all three of these CD8+ T-cell responses impose selection pressure on the virus, whereas in HLA-B*27:05-positive subjects there is no Nef-VW9-mediated selection pressure. These studies demonstrate that HLA-B*27:02 mediates protection against HIV disease progression that is at least as strong or stronger than that mediated by HLA-B*27:05. In combination with the protective Gag-KK10 and Pol-KY9 CD8+ T-cell responses that dominate HIV-specific CD8+ T-cell activity in HLA-B*27:05-positive subjects, a Nef-VW9-specific response is additionally present and immunodominant in HLA-B*27:02-positive subjects, mediated through a polymorphism at residue 81 in the F-pocket, that contributes to selection pressure against HIV.IMPORTANCECD8+ T-cells play a central role in successful control of HIV infection, and have the potential also to mediate the eradication of viral reservoirs of infection. The principal means by which ‘protective’ HLA class I molecules, such as HLA-B*27:05 and HLA-B*57:01, slow HIV disease progression, is believed to be via the particular HIV-specific CD8+ T cell responses restricted by those alleles. We focus here on HLA-B*27:05, one of the best-characterised ‘protective’ HLA molecules, and the closely-related HLA-B*27:02, which differs by only 3 amino acids, and which has not been well-studied in relation to control of HIV infection. We show that HLA-B*27:02 is also protective against HIV disease progression, but the CD8+ T-cell immunodominance hierarchy of HLA-B*27:02 differs strikingly from that of HLA-B*27:05. These findings indicate that the immunodominant HLA-B*27:02-restricted Nef response adds to protection mediated by the Gag and Pol specificities that dominate anti-HIV CD8+ T-cell activity in HLA-B*27:05-positive subjects.

scholarly journals LB-18. Broad and Prevalent SARS-CoV-2 CD8+ T Cell Response in Recovered COVID-19 Individuals Demonstrates Kinetics of Early Differentiation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S852-S853
Author(s):  
Hassen Kared ◽  
Evan Bloch ◽  
Andrew Redd ◽  
Alessandra Nardin ◽  
Hermi Sumatoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Peptide Epitopes ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Candidate Peptide

Abstract Background Understanding the diversity, breadth, magnitude, and functional profile of the T cell response against SARS-CoV-2 in recovered COVID-19 individuals is critical to evaluate the contribution of T cells to produce a potentially protective immune response. Methods We used a multiplexed peptide-MHC tetramer approach to screen a total of 408 SARS-CoV-2 candidate peptide epitopes for CD8+ T cell recognition in a cohort of 30 individuals recovered from COVID-19. The peptides spanned the whole viral genome and were restricted to six prevalent HLA alleles; T cells were simultaneously characterized by a 28-marker phenotypic panel. The evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 T cell responses was then statistically modeled against time from diagnosis, and in relation to humoral and inflammatory response. Workflow for Study. A multiplexed peptide-MHC tetramer approach was used to screen SARS-CoV-2 candidate peptide epitopes in a cohort of 30 COVID-19 recovered patients across 6 prevalent HLA alleles, and T cells profiled with a 28-marker phenotypic panel. Multiplex tetramer screen. One representative COVID-19 recovered patient and one healthy donor were screened for HLA- relevant SARS-CoV-2 epitopes, as well as epitopes for CMV, EBV, Influenza, Adenovirus and MART-1. Shown are the frequencies of tetramer-positive CD8 T cells from 2 technical replicates per subject. Results Almost all individuals screened showed a T cell response against SARS-CoV-2 (29/30): 132 SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells hits were detected, corresponding to 52 unique reactive epitopes. Twelve of the 52 unique SARS-CoV-2-specific epitopes were recognized by more than 40% of the individuals screened, indicating high prevalence in the subjects. Importantly, these CD8+ T cell responses were directed against both structural and non-structural viral proteins, with the highest magnitude against nucleocapsid derived peptides, but without any antigen-driven bias in the phenotype of specific T cells. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 T cells showed specific states of differentiation (stem-cell memory and transitional memory), which differed from those of MART-1, influenza, CMV and EBV-specific T cells. UMAP visualization revealed a phenotypic profile of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 T cells in COVID-19 convalescent donors that is distinct from other viral specificities, such as influenza, CMV, EBV and Adenovirus. SARS-CoV-2 epitope screening revealed CD8+ T cell responses directed against both structural and non-structural viral proteins, with the highest magnitude response against nucleocapsid derived peptides Conclusion The kinetics modeling demonstrates a dynamic, evolving immune response characterized by a time-dependent decrease in overall inflammation, increase in neutralizing antibody titer, and progressive differentiation of a broad SARS-CoV-2 CD8 T cell response. It could be desirable to aim at recapitulating the hallmarks of this robust CD8 T cell response in the design of protective COVID-19 vaccines. Disclosures Hassen Kared, PhD, ImmunoScape (Shareholder) Alessandra Nardin, DvM, ImmunoScape (Shareholder) Hermi Sumatoh, BSc, Dip MTech, ImmunoScape (Shareholder) Faris Kairi, BSc, ImmunoScape (Shareholder) Daniel Carbajo, PhD, ImmunoScape (Shareholder) Brian Abel, PhD, MBA, ImmunoScape (Shareholder) Evan Newell, PhD, ImmunoScape (Shareholder)

scholarly journals Novel Vβ specific germline contacts shape an elite controller T cell response

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Wang ◽  
Alexandra Tsitsiklis ◽  
Wei Gao ◽  
H. Hamlet Chu ◽  
Yan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Cell Response ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Cd8 T Cell ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
T Cell Response ◽  
Elite Controller ◽  
Unusual Structure ◽  
Mhc I ◽  
Cell Responses

AbstractCertain CD8 T cell responses are particularly effective at controlling infection, as exemplified by elite control of HIV in individuals harboring HLA-B57. To understand the structural features that contribute to CD8 T cell elite control, we focused on a strongly protective CD8 T cell response directed against a parasite-derived peptide (HF10) presented by an atypical MHC-I molecule, H-2Ld. This response exhibits a focused TCR repertoire dominated by Vβ2, and a representative TCR (TG6) in complex with Ld-HF10 reveals an unusual structure in which both MHC and TCR contribute extensively to peptide specificity, along with a parallel footprint of TCR on its pMHC ligand. The parallel footprint is a common feature of Vβ2-containing TCRs and correlates with an unusual Vα-Vβ interface, CDR loop conformations, and Vβ2-specific germline contacts with peptide. Vβ2 and Ld may represent “specialist” components for antigen recognition that allow for particularly strong and focused T cell responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document