M3P Sequencing Panel Identifies TP53 Mutational Status As a Prognostic Factor in Chemotherapy-Naive Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2984-2984
Author(s):  
Davine Hofste op Bruinink ◽  
K. Martin Kortüm ◽  
Mark van Duin ◽  
Mathijs A. Sanders ◽  
Remco Hoogenboezem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Prognostic Markers ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Tp53 Mutational Status

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by a highly variable disease course, which can be traced to initiating and acquired genomic events. Whole exome analysis of matched tumor and germline DNA from 287 MM patients identified recurrently somatically mutated genes (RSMGs) (Lohr et al. - Cancer Cell 2014, Bolli et al. - Nat Commun 2014). Despite the fact that these RSMGs affect pathways that are biologically important in MM, the clinical relevance of many of these genes in the context of conventional prognostic markers remains to be elucidated. Aims The aims of this pilot study were: (1) To validate the prevalence of RSMGs in our newly diagnosed MM patient cohort; (2) To assess the correlation between RSMGs, clinical parameters and outcome; (3) To thereby identify the potential clinical usefulness of introducing RSMG mutational profiling in larger MM trial cohorts. Material and Methods CD138+ enriched MM cells and peripheral blood were obtained with informed consent from chemotherapy-naive patients, participating in 3 clinical trials: HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4, HOVON-87/NMSG-18 and Carthadex (EudraCT number 2004-000944-26, 2007-004007-34 and 2009-014922-40, respectively). Matched tumor and germline DNA were sequenced on an Ion Torrent sequencing platform (PGM, Life Technologies), using the M3 P Mutational Panel v3.0, comprising 1327 customized oligos (Life Technologies), targeted at the coding sequences of 88 MM-relevant genes, including the RSMGs. Somatic mutations were considered positive when present in >=10% of tumor reads and <=10% germline reads, with a minimal coverage of 10x and being non-synonymous, or splice donor variants. All statistical analyses were performed in SPSS version 23, using the log-rank and Mann-Whitney U-test, with the Bonferroni test to correct for multiple comparisons. Results A total of 206 DNA samples were sequenced from 103 patients (HOVON-65/GMMG-HD4 (n=16), HOVON-87/NMSG-18 (n=67), Carthadex (n=20)) with an average coverage of 574x in tumor DNA, 451x in germline DNA and an overall coverage of 98%. We collected follow-up data from 102/103 patients, with a median follow-up time of 30 months. 168 somatic mutations were detected in 44/88 genes. 82% of patients had at least 1 somatic mutation. Genes most frequently mutated were: (1) NRAS (26%), (2) KRAS (22%), (3) DIS3 (14%), (4) FAM46C (9%), (5) TP53 (7%) and (6) BRAF (6%) (Figure 1). Of note, NRAS and KRAS mutations were mutually exclusive in our cohort. Moreover, all TP53 mutations were located in its DNA binding domain. Three out of 6 BRAF mutations were predicted to cause a V600E amino acid change. We focused on these 6 RSMGs in all further analyses. Correlating mutational status with Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) showed that TP53 mutated patients had a significantly shorter PFS compared to those with wildtype TP53 (adj. p-value=0,018; n=7 versus n=95). Comparing the mutational status of the 6 RSMGs, transplant versus non-transplant protocol, number of mutated genes in the M3 P panel, del17p and t(4;14) status, EMC92 score and ISS stage between patients with a PFS <=1 year and >1 year (n=23 versus n=79), only showed a significant correlation with TP53 mutational status (adj. p-value=0,012). TP53 mutational status remained the only significant prognostic factor when comparing patients with an OS <=1 year and >1 year (adj. p-value=0,003; n=13 versus n=89). When comparing the number of mutated genes, del17p and t(4;14) status, EMC92 score, transplant versus non-transplant protocol and ISS stage between TP53 mutated and wildtype MM, TP53 mutated patients had a significantly higher number of mutated genes in the M3 P panel (adj. p-value=0,001). Conclusions (1) With the M3 P Mutational Panel, we confirm the published prevalence of RSMGs in MM in our cohort of chemotherapy-naive patients. NRAS, KRAS, DIS3, FAM46C, TP53 and BRAF are the most frequently mutated genes. (2) TP53 mutational status is the strongest unfavorable prognostic factor in our cohort and it seems to be associated with greater mutational burden. Validation in a more extensive population is planned. (3) This warrants further investigation of the mutational status of these genes in larger clinical trial cohorts, enabling a more robust comparison with conventional prognostic markers in a multivariate analysis. Disclosures Broijl: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zweegman:Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Sonneveld:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; SkylineDx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Response to Treatment Among SF3B1 Mutated Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): A Case-Control Study from the MDS Clinical Research Consortium (MDS CRC)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1697-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rami S. Komrokji ◽  
Amy E. DeZern ◽  
Katrina Zell ◽  
Najla H. Al Ali ◽  
Eric Padron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Matching Criteria

Abstract Introduction Somatic mutations in SF3B1 ,a gene encoding a core component of RNA splicing machinery, have been identified in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The SF3B1 mutation (MT) is more commonly detected in pts with ring sideroblasts (RS) morphology and is associated with favorable outcome. The pattern of response among SF3B1 mutated MDS pts to available treatment options, including erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA), hypomethylating agents (HMA) and lenalidomide is not known. The distinct underlying disease biology among such pts may alter response to treatment. Methods Pts treated at MDS CRC institutions with MT vs wild-type SF3B1 (WT) controls were matched 1:2. Matching criteria were age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) category at diagnosis. IPSS category was split into two groups (Low or Int-1 vs. Int-2 or High). Matching was performed using the R package by calculating a propensity score, which was then used to determine the two most similar WT SF3B1 patients for each SF3B1-mutated pt, without replacement. Additionally, to be included in the population, pts also had to have been treated with one of the following: ESAs, HMA, or lenalidomide. Response to treatment was evaluated by international Working Group criteria (IWG 2006) and classified as response if hematological improvement or better was achieved (HI+). Survival was calculated from date of treatment until date of death or last known follow-up, unless otherwise noted. Results: We identified 48 Pts with MT and 96 matched controls. Table 1 summarizes baseline characteristics comparing MT vs WT SF3B1 cohorts. SF3B1 MT was detected more often in association with RS, as expected. The majority of pts had lower-risk disease by IPSS and revised IPSS (IPSS-R). Pts with MT had higher platelets than controls. The most common concomitant somatic mutations observed were TET2 (30%), DNMT3A (21%), and ASXL1 (7%). Median follow-up time from diagnosis was 35 months (mo). Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was significantly longer for patients with SF3B1 MT (108.5 mo (68.8, NA)) than wild-type controls (28.3 mo (22.3, 36.4); p < 0.001). Patients with an SF3B1 MT had a decreased hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.49 (95% confidence limits [95% CL]: 0.29, 0.84); p = 0.009) ESA was the first line therapy for 43 pts (88%) with MT and 55 WT Pts (56%). For ESA treated pts, 14 out 40 MT Pts responded (35%) compared to 9/56 among WT Pts (16%), p 0.032. Among those treated with HMA therapy, 5 out 21 (24%) MT pts responded compared to 11/46 (24%) WT Pts (p 0.99). Finally, for Pts treated with lenalidomide 4/16 (25%) and 4/21 (19%) responded among SF3B1 MT and WT Pts respectively, p 0.7. Conclusions SF3B1 somatic mutation in MDS is commonly associated with RS, lower risk disease, and better OS. Pts with SF3B1 mutation had higher response to ESA compared WT SF3B1. No difference in response to HMA or lenalidomide was observed compared to WT patients. Response rates to lenalidomide and HMA were low in both MT patients and controls. Biologically rational therapies are needed that target this molecular disease subset. Table 1. Baseline characteristics SF3B1 MT (n=48) SF3B1 WT (n=96) P value Age median 65 67 0.6 Gender male 29 (60%) 64(67%) 0.5 Race White 44/45 (98%) 83/90 (92%) 0.34 WHO classification RA RARS RCMD RARS-T Del5 q RAEB-I RAEB-II MDS-U MDS/MPN CMML 3 24 8 4 1 3 3 2 0 0 6 9 17 2 6 10 9 3 11 9 IPSS Low Int-1 Int-2 High 29 (60%) 16 (33%) 3 (6%) 0 21 (22%) 69 (72%) 4 (4%) 2 (2%) < 0.001 IPSS-R Very low Low Intermediate High Very High 15 (31%) 26 (54%) 5 (10%) 2 (4%) 0 11 (11%) 37 (39%) 26 (27%) 18 (19%) 4 (4%) <0.001 Lab values (mean) Hgb Platelets ANC myeloblasts 9.7 274 2.63 1 9.6 108 1.92 2 0.46 <0.001 0.04 0.05 Disclosures Komrokji: Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pharmacylics: Speakers Bureau. Padron:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding. List:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. Steensma:Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Onconova: Consultancy. Sekeres:Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Ruxolitinib Therapy in Myelofibrosis: Analysis of 241 Patients Treated in Compassionate Use (French “ATU” program) by the French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (FIM).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2841-2841
Author(s):  
Annalisa Andreoli ◽  
Jerome Rey ◽  
Charles Dauriac ◽  
Raoul Herbrecht ◽  
Franck E. Nicolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Costal Margin ◽  
Spleen Size ◽  
Compassionate Use ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mutational Status

Abstract Abstract 2841 Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, splenomegaly, cytopenias and constitutional symptoms. Ruxolitinib was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of MF in the USA; its approval in Europe is still pending. However, EU patients may access to ruxolitinib through compassionate programs. In France, health authorities opened a compassionate patient-named program (Authorization for Temporary Utilization [ATU] program. Methods: 241 French patients (pts) with MF, including primary (PMF), post-polycythemia vera (PPV) and post-essential thrombocythemia (PET) MF were granted ruxolitinib therapy through ATU program, independently of their JAK2 mutational status, between April 15, 2011 and May 31, 2012. Physicians were asked to provide information on disease characteristics, treatment history, constitutional symptoms, spleen size, platelet and neutrophils count, as well as the ruxolitinib dose prescribed and adverse events (AE). Request forms had to be submitted at the time of initial application and every 3 months upon drug resupply or in case of treatment discontinuation. This analysis has been performed based on data available at baseline (n= 241), after 3 months (n= 101), 6 months (n= 57), 9 months (n= 21) and 12 months (n= 4). Results: In the entire cohort, 138 pts were men and 103 women. Median age was 68.3 years. 51.5% of pts had PMF, 22.8% PPV-MF and 23.8% PET-MF. 99.2% of pts had received ≥1 lines of therapy for MF prior to ruxolitinib (hydroxyurea: 56%; pipobroman: 15.4%; iMIDs: 13.7%; interferons: 13.7%; erythropoietins: 6.6%; spleen irradiation: 6.6%; anagrelide: 5.8%; corticosteroids: 4.9%). Despite these therapies, 93.7% had constitutional symptoms and 94.2% of patients presented a palpable splenomegaly (median 15 cm below costal margin) at inclusion. Efficacy: According to the baseline platelet count, ruxolitinib therapy was initiated at 15 mg BID in 132 pts (54.8%) or 20 mg BID in 103 pts (42.7%), or other doses in a minority of pts (n=6). Among the pts who were evaluable after 3 and 6 months of therapy, 96.5% and 90% presented a mean reduction in the spleen size (by palpation) by 47.2% and 46% from baseline, respectively. Constitutional symptoms resolved in 65.3% and 70.2% of pts at the aforementioned time points, respectively. In pts who completed 9 months follow-up (n=21), benefits in spleen size reduction and symptoms resolution were durable (95% and 71.4%). Safety: Since the beginning of the ruxolitinib ATU program, 83 pts presented at least one AE, including 27 pts with serious AE (SAE), with or without causal relationship to ruxolitinib therapy. AE, all grades, were essentially hematologic abnormalities (51.6%), gastro-intestinal 6.3%, cardiac 3.1%, musculoskeletal 3.1%, hepatic 2.3%, infection 2.3%. Dose adjustments were reported in 60 pts, mainly due to thrombocytopenia (n=36) and anemia (n=13). However, no patient discontinued ruxolitinib therapy because of cytopenia. Treatment was discontinued in 11 patients after a median duration of 2.6 months (range 0.3–7.9 months). Reasons for discontinuation were death (n=6), AE (n=2), inefficacy (n=2), and patient decision (n= 1). Conclusion: In this large, unselected population of heavily pretreated MF pts, ruxolitinib therapy appeared to be effective in treating both constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly, in line with previously reported efficacy in clinical trials. The safety profile seems also comparable. Comprehensive data and updated follow-up of the cohort will be presented. Disclosures: Off Label Use: compassionate use of ruxolitinib for myélofibrosis in France (indication not yet approved by EMEA). Rey:Novartis: Consultancy. Nicolini:novartis, Bristol myers Squibb, Pfizer, Ariad and Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Recher:Celgène, Genzyme, Sunesis, Jansen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel to ASH Other. Ranta:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Legros:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, Travel to meeting Other. Viallard:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dupriez:novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Coiteux:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb: Speakers Bureau. Demory:Novartis: Honoraria. Giraudier:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ugo:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Travel to ASH Other. Kiladjian:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Roy:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Travel to ASH Other.

Could Chronic Gvhd Overcome the Poor Prognosis of Patients with MDS and TP53 Undergoing Allogeneic HSCT?

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2890-2890
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Caballero ◽  
Mercedes Sánchez-Barba ◽  
Mónica Del Rey ◽  
Kamila Janusz ◽  
Eva Lumbreras ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Poor Outcome

Abstract Background and Aim Although new agents have been approved for the treatment of MDS, the only curative approach for these patients is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Nevertheless, in these patients this approach has only obtained 40-60% of overall survival. Somatic mutations in MDS have recently been analyzed in order to confirm clonally and also prognostic impact in MDS patients. In this regard, TP 53 mutated gene is present in MDS in less than 10% of patients and is associated with advanced disease and high-risk features. Recent studies confirms poor outcomes in patients with TP 53 mutated receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation1,2. The present study try to analyze if the development of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) could modify, due to graft versus leukemia effect, the adverse prognosis of these high-risk patients (TP53 mutated patients). Design and Methods <>Results of HSCT in 92 MDS patients from 5 centers in Spain were retrospectively studied. Samples were collected 1 month prior to transplant. 280ng of the genomic DNA from BM cells was screened for somatic mutations in TP53 gene. The study was done by NGS on a GS Junior Instrument (Roche) according to an amplicon sequencing design. For each sample, eight exons (4-11) were amplified with preconfigured primer plates provided within the IRON II study network. Data analysis, were carried out using the Sequence Pilot software version 3.5.2 (JSI Medical Systems) and GS Amplicon Variant Analyzer software, versions 2.7 and 2.9 (Roche Applied Science). Minimum coverage of sequenced exons was 100 reads and the sensitivity of variant detection was set to a lower limit of >2% for bidirectional reads. Only those variants that resulted in amino acid change in the protein sequence were considered. OS and RFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for comparisons. All calculations were done using SPSS 18.0. Cumulative incidence of relapse was also calculated by xlstat version 2014 program. <>Results Median age was 54 years (17-69), 71.7% were "de novo" MDS and regarding IPSS, 53% were in the int-2/high-risk category. Other characteristics were in Table 1. In the pre-transplant evaluation, 15 patients out of 92 (16,3%) were TP 53 mutated. The mutations were located in exons 5, 6, 7, 8 and 10. These variations were present in a variable percentageof the cell population (3 to 84%). All mutations were specific nucleotide changes except for two cases. At the time of the last update, 16 patients had relapsed (17.4%) and 40 had died (43.5%). After a median follow up of 15.5 months, OS was 56.5%. Median OS for patients with mutated TP53 trend a toward to be shorter than survival for patients without mutated TP53 (median of 7 mo vs median not reached, respectively, p=0.156). Multivariate analysis for OS confirmed complex karyotype (HR 5,588, 95CI 1,794-17,407, p=0.003) and no developement of cGVHD (HR 3,531, 95IC 1,634-7,632, p=0.001) as predictors for poor outcome. Cumulative incidence of relapse was 20.3% (+/-4.3%) at 1 years. Mutational status of TP53 significantly influenced on relapse (53.3% +/-12.9% vs 13.7% +/-4% at 1 year for patients with vs without TP 53 mutation (Gray test=0.001, Figure 2). Regarding Relapse Free Survival (RFS), after a median of follow up of 17 months, RFS was 67.9% and as previously suggested, the presence of TP 53 mutation had an impact on RFS (41.7% for mutated (median RFS of 6 months) and 75% for non mutated patients (median RFS not reached), p=0.009). Multivariate analysis for RFS confirmed age (HR 1.054, 95CI 1.005-1.106, p=0.032) and TP 53 mutated (HR 3.054, 95IC 1.145-8.149, p=0.026) as predictors for lower RFS. Regarding 15 patients with mutated TP 53, 7 did relapsed and 9 had died. Developement of cGVHD showed a trend toward to improve outcome among TP 53 mutated patients, with a better OS and RFS for those developing cGVHD as compared to those who did not (OS of 55% vs 17% for patients with and without cGVHD, p=0.039, Figure 2 and RFS of 71% vs 50%, respectively, p=0.3). <>Conclusions Mutated TP53 pre-allo patients presents poor outcome as compared to not mutated, as previously described Bejar1 and Kim2. Nevertheless, the developement of cGVHD could overcome the adverse impact of this factor due to the developement of graft versus tumor efect, improving survival curves (OS and RFS) as compared to previous published results. Study supported by GRS-1033/A/14 P53. 1.-BŽjar, JCO 2014, 32(25). 2.-Kim, BBMT 2015, Epub ahead of print. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Sanz: JANSSEN CILAG: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Valcarcel:AMGEN: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CELGENE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Díez-Campelo:CELGENE: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; JANSSEN: Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Similar Efficacy and Safety of CT-P10 and Reference Rituximab in Patients with Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma: Updated Phase III Study Results

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1616-1616
Author(s):  
Won-Seog Kim ◽  
Christian Buske ◽  
Larry W Kwak ◽  
Michinori Ogura ◽  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
P Value ◽  
Maintenance Period ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Response

Abstract Background: CT-P10 is an approved biosimilar to the innovator rituximab (RTX) from many countries including European Union based in part on the pharmacokinetics (PK) equivalence and comparable efficacy in patients with previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) when treated with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) as an induction therapy (Coiffier B et al. ASH 2016; Kim WS et al. ASCO 2017). Objective: We report here the updated efficacy outcomes including progression free survival (PFS), duration of response, overall survival (OS), as well as updated safety profile of CT-P10 compared to RTX in advanced FL patients with median follow-up duration of 23 months including the Maintenance Period with rituximab monotherapy. Methods: These results were derived from an ongoing randomized and double-blind study in patients with previously untreated advanced FL (NCT02162771). A total of 140 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio and 124 patients completed 8 cycles of R-CVP induction therapy. One-hundred twenty two patients (62 patients in CT-P10 group and 60 patients in RTX group), who showed response during the Induction Period, entered the Maintenance Period where a total of 12 cycles of rituximab monotherapy was to be administered every 2 months. The study was planned to continue until death or up to 3 years from the randomized date of the last patient. Kaplan Meier (KM) method was used to estimate PFS, duration of response, and OS. Results: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics; overall median age of 58 years, 55% female, 57% with FLIPI score ≥3, 100% with Stage III/IV, 18% with bulky disease (≥7cm) and 26% with B-Symptom. As of the cut-off date for investigator-assessed PFS, duration of response and OS, median follow-up was 23 months (range, 0.5-34) in the CT-P10 group and 22 months (range, 0.2-33) in the RTX group. The proportion of patients who had experienced relapse, disease progression or death from any cause was 22.9% (16/70) and 24.3% (17/70) for the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between CT-P10 and RTX groups in PFS (log rank, p-value: 0.806) with 2-year PFS of 75.2% and 73.5%, respectively (Figure 1). In terms of sustained response, the proportions of patient who showed relapse or disease progression after achieving overall response (Complete Response, unconfirmed Complete Response, or Partial Response) were 19.4% (13/67) in CT-P10 group and 21.3% (13/61) in RTX group, and the KM curves showed no statistically significant difference between CT-P10 and RTX (log rank, p-value: 0.997) (Figure 2). Death from any cause were 5.7% (4/70) and 2.9% (2/70) in the CT-P10 and RTX groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in OS (log rank, p-value: 0.464) between the CT-P10 and RTX groups with 2-year OS of 93.2% and 95.3%, respectively. Overall safety profile of CT-P10 was consistent with that of RTX (Table 1). A similar number of patients in each treatment group experienced at least 1 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) considered to be related to the study drug, infusion-related reaction, and infection. The proportion of patients with positive anti-drug antibody was also similar in both groups (4.3% [3/70] vs 5.7% [4/70] in the CT-P10 and RTX groups). Neither progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy nor Hepatitis B virus reactivation was reported in either group. Conclusion: At the median follow-up duration of 23 months, the updated efficacy data in advanced FL patients demonstrated comparable PFS, sustained response and OS between CT-P10 and RTX. CT-P10 was also well tolerated and its safety profile was similar to that of RTX. The updated safety results did not reveal any trends or new signals noted in the patients treated with CT-P10. Disclosures Kim: Mundipharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Buske:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ogura:MeijiSeika Pharma: Consultancy; Celltrion: Consultancy, Research Funding; Mundi Pharma: Consultancy; SymBio: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Cellgene: Honoraria. Coiffier:CELGENE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MUNDIPHARMA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CELLTRION: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MORPHOSYS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NOVARTIS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lee:Celltrion, Inc: Employment. Kim:Celltrion, Inc: Employment.

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Circulating Bcl-2/Igh Levels before and after Treatment in 415 Patients with Advanced Follicular Lymphoma Receiving First-Line Immuno-Chemotherapy in 2 Prospective StiL Trials - the Effect of Rituximab Maintenance

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4149-4149
Author(s):  
Guido Kobbe ◽  
Sabrina Pechtel ◽  
Fabian Zohren ◽  
Jürgen Barth ◽  
Alexander Christoph Burchardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
The Other ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance

Abstract Introduction. The prognosis of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) has improved during recent years following the introduction of immuno-chemotherapy and Rituximab maintenance. Nevertheless, some patients still relapse early and have a poor prognosis. Several prognostic scoring systems have been developed using clinical, laboratory as well as molecular data, while the early identification of high-risk patients remains a challenge. In this context, the relevance of circulating bcl2/IgH levels for patient stratification is not clear. We could show that high circulating bcl2/IgH levels in the peripheral blood (PB) before therapy were an independent adverse prognostic factor for progression free survival (PFS) in patients receiving R-CHOP or Bendamustine-Rituximab (B-R) in the NHL1 study of the German StiL group (Zohren et al, Blood 2015). Methods. Using a sensitive quantitative PCR method as previously described (Zohren et al, Blood 2015), a total of 2,491 circulating bcl-2/IgH level analyses were performed on PB samples before (n=415) and after (n=305) 6 cycles first-line immuno-chemotherapy and during follow-up (n=1,771). Results of these molecular studies were correlated with clinical outcome. We first present a 10-year update of the 107 bcl2/IgHpositive patients from the StiL-NHL1-trial. Secondly, we report the results from the StiL-NHL7-trial including bcl2/IgH analyses of 308 bcl2/IgHpositive patients who received B-R and Rituximab maintenance. Results. With a median follow-up of 10 years in the 107 bcl2/IgHpositive patients from the StiL-NHL1-trial, high PB bcl-2/IgH levels (bcl-2/IgH to reference gene (tPA) ratio >1) before treatment as compared to low (ratio <1) levels remained a major independent prognostic factor for PFS (median 22 vs 71 months, HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.37-3.75; p=0.001). We also confirm that patients who were still bcl-2/IgHpositive after six cycles of immuno-chemotherapy had significantly inferior PFS (13 vs 79 months, Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.97, 95% CI 1.53-5.78; p=0.001) and overall survival (OS, 128 months vs not reached , HR 3.90, 95% CI 1.39-11.00; p=0.010). In contrast, among the 308 bcl-2/IgHpositive patients of the StiL-NHL7-trial, who all received B-R and Rituximab maintenance, PB bcl-2/IgH levels (ratio >1 vs <1) before therapy were no longer prognostic for PFS (99 months vs not reached, HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.66 - 1.69; p=0.814) or OS. On the other hand, being bcl-2/IgHpositive after 6x B-R remained a poor prognostic factor for PFS (43 months vs not reached, HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.18-5.04; p=0.016 ) and OS (72 months vs not reached, HR 4.03, 95% CI 1.82-8.96; p=0.001) despite Rituximab maintenance. When comparing StiL-NHL1 and StiL-NHL7 patients with respect to bcl-2/IgH levels and the effect of Rituximab maintenance, we found that Rituximab maintenance led to a significantly better PFS. In patients with low (ratio <1) bcl-2/IgH levels before therapy the hazard ratio of 1.7 was modest (71 months vs not reached, HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.16-2.50; p=0.006) in comparison to 3.46 as observed in patients with high (ratio >1) bcl-2/IgH levels (22 vs 99 months, HR 3.46, 95% CI 1.93-6.20; p<0.000). These findings suggest that patients with high bcl-2/IgH levels before therapy have a greater benefit from Rituximab maintenance therapy. There was no difference with regard to OS between StiL-NHL1 and StiL-NHL7 patients who were still bcl-2/IgHpositive after 6 cycles of immuno-chemotherapy implying that these patients may not benefit from Rituximab maintenance. Conclusion. High circulating bcl-2/IgH levels in the PB before first line therapy identify a subgroup of patients with advanced FL who have significantly shorter PFS after standard immuno-chemotherapy. These patients greatly benefit from the addition of Rituximab maintenance, because pre-treatment bcl-2/IgH levels lose their predictive value with Rituximab maintenance therapy. On the other hand, patients who remain bcl-2/IgHpositive after standard immuno-chemotherapy have short PFS and OS despite treatment with Rituximab maintenance and therefore are candidates for experimental treatment approaches. Disclosures Kobbe: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support, Research Funding. Zohren:Pfizer Inc.: Employment. Buske:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Germing:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Greil:Sandoz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Schroeder:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Rummel:Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria; Eisai: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Symbio: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals The Role of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential (CHIP) in Multiple Myeloma: Immunomodulator Maintenance Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Predicts Better Outcome

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 749-749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek H Mouhieddine ◽  
Jihye Park ◽  
Robert A. Redd ◽  
Christopher J. Gibson ◽  
Salomon Manier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
P Value ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Advisory Committees

Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell malignancy, accounting for 10% of all hematological malignancies. Genetic analyses of large populations revealed that blood-specific somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are commonly acquired during aging, a new entity labeled: clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). We sought to determine the role of CHIP on survival of MM patients, specifically those receiving immunomodulator (IMiD) maintenance (Lenalidomide or Thalidomide) post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Methods: We collected the cryopreserved, growth factor mobilized peripheral blood of 629 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2003 and 2011 at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Then, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing using a 224-gene panel at a mean depth of coverage of 978X and ultra-low pass whole-genome sequencing at 0.1X to account for tumor contamination. We downloaded (dbGAP # phs000748.v6.p4) the whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of a cohort of 1144 newly diagnosed, untreated MM patients from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) Clinical Outcomes in MM to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile (CoMMpass, NCT0145429) study (MMRC) and the WES data of a cohort of 205 newly diagnosed, untreated MM patients from the Broad Institute dataset. We analyzed their peripheral blood (average coverage of 108X) and tumor (average coverage of 107X) data separately, looking for the same CHIP genes included in our target bait panel. Results: The DFCI cohort had a median age of 58 years [range, 24-83] at time of ASCT and median follow up post ASCT of 8 years [range, 0.1-14.5]. 204 patients (32%) in the DFCI cohort had CHIP at time of ASCT. The most commonly detected mutated genes were DNMT3A, TET2, TP53, ASXL1 and PPM1D. 24 patients (3.8%) developed a second hematological malignancy at a median of 4 years [range, 1-10] post ASCT, half of whom had CHIP. Around 48% of the DFCI cohort received IMiDs as part of induction therapy. Different induction regimens had no effect on CHIP prevalence at time of ASCT. Around 56% of the DFCI cohort received IMiD maintenance, 22% of which received maintenance for at least 3 years [range, 0.06-12.8]. Among those who did not receive IMiD maintenance, patients with CHIP had worse progression free survival (PFS) (p-value < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p-value = 0.005). In patients receiving IMiD maintenance, having CHIP had no effect on PFS or OS. On the other hand, the MMRF cohort had a median age of 63 years [range, 27-93] and median follow up of 3.03 years [range, 0-5.9] from time of diagnosis. Around 52% of that cohort underwent ASCT and around 76% of those received IMiD maintenance with a median follow up of 2.7 years [range, 0-5.5] from time of ASCT. Furthermore, 200 patients of the MMRF cohort have follow-up samples of both tumor and peripheral blood that had targeted sequencing done by a 562-gene panel that included our genes of interest. Similarly, when studying the genomic results of 139 out of 1144 MMRF patients, as well as the 205 patients from the Broad Institute dataset, we detected CHIP in 25.6% of them and the top 5 most commonly mutated genes were similar to those of our cohort. Conclusion: CHIP is a common entity among MM patients, reaching a prevalence of up to 32%, that predicts a worse PFS and OS in those who do not receive IMiD maintenance therapy post ASCT. As expected, IMiD maintenance improves outcome in MM patients, with and without CHIP. In patients with CHIP, the use of IMiDs abrogated the deleterious effect imposed by CHIP to a point that outcome is identical to that of patients without CHIP. Figure Figure. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; OncoPep: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; Celgene: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Millennium Takeda: Consultancy. Richardson:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Activating Mutations of the NRAS/KRAS Genes in Patients with Primary and Post-Essential Thrombocythemia (ET)/Polycythemia Vera (PV) Myelofibrosis (MF)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1756-1756
Author(s):  
Fabio PS Santos ◽  
Bartlomiej Getta ◽  
Lucia Masarova ◽  
Christopher Famulare ◽  
Jessica Schulman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
P Value ◽  
Driver Genes ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Kras Mutations ◽  
P Values

Abstract Introduction: MF is a Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (Ph-negative MPN) associated with driver mutations in the JAK-STAT pathway (e.g. JAK2, CALR, MPL) and other mutations in genes that lead to epigenetic changes and altered RNA splicing (e.g. TET2, SRSF2, ASXL1, EZH2). The RAS-signaling pathway is frequently altered in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other myeloid malignancies, but few studies have evaluated the prevalence of such mutations in patients with MF. We sought to describe the frequency and clinical features of RAS mutations in patients with MF. Methods: We analyzed next-generation sequencing data from 723 patients with a diagnosis of primary MF (N=520), post-PV MF (N=119) and post-ET MF (N=84). Sequencing was performed with either paired tumor-normal whole exome sequencing (WES; N=56) or selected gene panel for genes associated with myeloid malignancies (N=667). The following 16 genes were analyzed in all 723 patients and were considered as the common denominator for analysis: ASXL1, CALR, DNMT3A, EZH2, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, KIT, KRAS, MPL, NRAS, RUNX1, TET2, TP53, WT1. RAS mutations were considered as oncogenic mutations in NRAS and/or KRAS. Molecular high risk (MHR) mutations were considered as mutations in any one of the 4 genes: ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2 (SRSF2 mutations were not included since they were not evaluated in all cases). Odds ratio (OR) and P-values were estimated using Fisher's exact test in pairwise comparisons among genetic features, and P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure, with significant Q-values considered as those <0.15. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and defined as the time from the date of sample collection for mutation analysis until death from any cause, with patients alive at last follow-up censored. Cumulative incidence of AML transformation (CI-AML) was defined from the time of mutation analysis until evolution to AML, considering death without AML transformation as a competing risk. A Cox proportional hazards model was fitted to determine the hazard ratio (HR) of independent covariates associated with the dependent variable OS. Results: Mutations in RAS genes were found in 44 patients (6.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-8.1%). There were 32 cases with NRAS mutations (4.4%; 95% CI 3-6.2%), 15 cases with KRAS mutations (2%; 95% CI 1.2-3.4%), and there were 3 cases with mutations in both genes (0.4%; 95% CI 0.1-1.3%). JAK-STAT driver genes found in the cohort included JAK2 (N=486), CALR (N=94), MPL (N=35) and Triple-negative status (N=108), and there was no difference in the distribution of JAK-STAT driver genes among patients with NRAS/KRAS mutations (p=0.96). Patients with NRAS/KRAS mutations had a higher number of non-driver mutations (median 3 vs 1; p=8.5e-20), higher white blood cell counts (median 15.1x109/L vs 10.5x109/L, p=0.02) and more frequently harbored ASXL1 mutations (OR 3.00, q=0.01), EZH2 mutations (OR 3.40, q=0.11) and MHR mutations (OR 3.13, q=0.004). There was a negative association of NRAS/KRAS mutations with del(20q) changes in karyotype (OR <0.001, q=0.06). After a median follow-up of 30 months and 439 events, OS was significantly reduced in patients harboring NRAS/KRAS mutations (median 19.5 months vs. 44.6 months, HR 2.95, p-value=5.99e-06; figure 1). The presence of NRAS/KRAS mutations was also associated with a higher CI-AML (4 years 18.4% vs. 14%, p-value=0.03). In a multivariate Cox model, NRAS/KRAS mutations were associated with worse OS after adjusting for other prognostic variables in MF (Table 1), including Dynamic International Prognostic Score System (DIPSS), karyotype and presence of MHR mutations. In a subset analysis of 396 patients with Int-2/High risk DIPSS, there were 202 patients who were treated with ruxolitinib. NRAS/KRAS mutated patients who received ruxolitinib (N=24) had superior OS than patients who did not receive the drug, but still inferior when compared to patients with wild-type NRAS/KRAS (Figure 2). Conclusion: Patients with a diagnosis of MF who harbor NRAS/KRAS mutations comprise a high-risk subgroup with poor outcomes. NRAS/KRAS mutational status should be evaluated in future prognostic models in MF. The efficacy of JAK2 inhibitors needs to be further studied in this subgroup of patients, as well as the possibility of targeting the RAS pathway with MEK inhibitors. Disclosures Rampal: Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding. Verstovsek:Italfarmaco: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals CD5 Negative Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Clinicopathologic Correlations and Outcome in 58 Cases

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2964-2964
Author(s):  
Annapurna Saksena ◽  
Yuan Miao ◽  
Pei Lin ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
C. Cameron Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
P Value ◽  
Clinicopathologic Features ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a B-cell neoplasm that has a characteristic immunophenotype of being positive for CD5, B-cell antigens and cyclin D1. A small subset of cases of MCL can be negative for CD5, approximately 5% in the literature. The clinicopathologic features and prognosis of patients with CD5-negative MCL are poorly characterized. Here, we study a group of patients with CD5- MCL and compare them with a group patients with CD5+ MCL. Methods: From a total of 270 cases of MCL accessioned from 2004-2015, 58 CD5- cases (study group) and 212 CD5+ cases (control group) were identified. All cases of MCL were positive for cyclin D1 by immunohistochemistry and, in most patients, CCND1-IGH was shown FISH. Cases negative for CD5 were assessed by flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemistry. Fisher exact test was utilized to analyze differences between the CD5- and CD5+ groups. Patient survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses for OS and PFS were performed (SPSS 22 software). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The CD5- group included 39 men and 19 women with a median age of 66 years (range, 36- 88 years) at time of diagnosis. The CD5- and CD5+ groups shared overlapping clinicopathological features, but CD5- cases showed a lower percentage of men (P=0.006) than CD5+ cases. Treatment information was available for 50 patients. Twenty-nine (58%) patients were treated initially with R-Hyper CVAD therapy (rituximab, fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone alternating with high dose methotrexate and cytarabine). Seventeen (34%) patients were treated initially with less aggressive therapy: 7 with R-CHOP; 8 had other rituximab-based chemotherapy regimens; 2 received rituximab as a single agent. Four patients (8%) were observed without therapy. After induction, 34 patients achieved complete remission (CR), 5 patients achieved partial remission (PR), 6 patients showed no response (NR) or progressive disease (PD), and 5 patients lost follow-up. Ten patients also underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT): 5 patients received allogeneic SCT, the other 5 autologous SCT. With a median follow-up of 45.7 months (range, 2.0-174.3 months), 13 of 56 (23.2%) patients died, 43 of 56 (76.8%) patients were alive at last follow-up, and the rest of 2 patients lost follow up. The induction chemotherapy regimens and CR and PR rate were not significantly different between the CD5- and CD5+ groups (p>0.05). Survival analysis showed patients with CD5- MCL had a tendency for longer OS (Figure 1A, P=0.078). Further analysis showed that lack of CD5 expression predicted a superior OS in a few subsets of MCL patients defined with 1) normal WBC count (p=0.049); 2) Stage I/II disease (p=0.046); 3) Low/intermediate MIPI (p=0.041) and 4) Ki67≥30% (at a borderline p value of 0.05). Patients with CD5- MCL also showed a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (Figure 1B, P=0.01). Absence of CD5 expression was associated with a better PFS in MCL patients with advanced disease (stage III-IV) (P=0.035), a normal leukocyte count (P=0.018), a normal serum lactate dehydrogenase level (P=0.046), classical morphology (P=0.029), and low/intermediate MIPI (p=0.0004). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that MIPI was the only independent prognostic factor for both OS and PFS (P=0.026 and P=0.001 respectively) and CR/PR also predict a better OS (P=0.004) in CD5- MCL patients. Conclusion: The clinicopathologic features were similar between patients with CD5- MCL and those with CD5+ MCL, except that less men in the CD5- MCL group. Lack of CD5 expression was associated with a favorable PFS in MCL patients. Recognizing this subgroup of CD5- MCL has not only a diagnostic significance, but also a prognostic significance. Figure Figure. Disclosures Wang: Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Asana BioSciences: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding.

scholarly journals Extranodal Presentation in Limited Stage DLBCL As a Prognostic Marker in Three Sequential SWOG Trials S0014, S0313 and S1001 (NCT00005089, NCT00070018, NCT01359592)

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1423-1423
Author(s):  
Deborah M. Stephens ◽  
Hongli Li ◽  
Louis S. Constine ◽  
John P. Leonard ◽  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
P Value ◽  
Nodal Disease ◽  
Ibritumomab Tiuxetan ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Limited Stage

Abstract Introduction Several recent pivotal trials have changed the standard of care for patients with limited stage (LS) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) to minimize the number of chemoimmunotherapy cycles and/or eliminate the need for radiotherapy (RT) without compromising excellent long-term outcomes (Poeschel 2019; Persky 2020; Bologna 2021). However, there may be subsets of patients where an abbreviated treatment approach is insufficient. With this in mind, Bobillo (2021), retrospectively reviewed pts with LS DLBCL treated with RCHOP (4-6 cycles) +/- RT and reported an extranodal (EN) presentation had shorter PFS and OS compared with nodal presentation. In these pts, consolidative RT prolonged survival in pts with EN disease, especially those with a positive PET scan at the end of chemotherapy. We sought to validate these findings by analyzing patients with LS DLBCL treated on 3 consecutive SWOG studies (S0014, S0313, S1001). Methods From 4/1/00 - 6/1/16, 234 eligible patients with non-bulky (exception of 2 patients on S0014) LS DLBCL were accrued to S0014 (n=60), S0313 (n=43), or S1001 (n=131), Enrolled pts received therapy with RCHOP x 3 + involved field radiotherapy (IFRT; 26%); RCHOP x 3 + IFRT + ibritumomab tiuxetan (24%); or RCHOP x 4 (51%). In S1001, an interim PET (iPET) scan was performed after RCHOP x 3 and considered negative if the Deauville Score was ≤3. Fisher's exact test compared the distribution of the characteristics and treatments received at 2-sided a of .05. PFS was calculated from date of randomization until progression/relapse/death. OS was calculated from date of randomization until death. PFS and OS estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Median follow-up is 7 years (range 1.1 - 15.8 years). Median age was 62 (range 18 - 85) and 68% had stage-modified international prognostic index (sm-IPI) of 0-1. Of the 234 pts, 104 (44%) had EN disease. Most common sites of EN disease were head & neck (n=55; nasopharynx=14; oral cavity=17; orbit=2; parotid=4; sinus=7; submandibular gland=1; thyroid=9; vocal cord=1), skin/soft tissue/muscle (n=12), gastrointestinal tract (n=11), bone (n=6), and breast (n=6). Clinical characteristics (age, stage, LDH, sm-IPI) and treatments received between EN and nodal disease groups were not statistically different. For the whole group, estimated 10-year PFS and OS were 71% (95% CI: 64% - 77%) and 77% (95% CI: 69% - 83%), respectively. For patients with extranodal versus nodal disease, there was no difference in the estimated 10-year PFS (74% vs 68%; 2-sided logrank p-value=.51, Figure 1A) or 10-year OS (77% vs 77%; 2-sided logrank p-value=.65; Figure 1B). For the 55 pts with EN disease of the head & neck, estimated 10-year PFS and OS were 61% (44% - 74%) and 77% (63% - 87%). Among the 104 pts with EN disease who received versus did not receive IFRT, there was no difference in the estimated 5-year PFS (83% vs 87%; 2-sided logrank p-value=.52) or 5-year OS (85% vs 92%; 2-sided logrank p-value=.28). Of 55 pts with EN disease treated on S1001, 5 (9%) pts had iPET+, 47 (85.5%) pts had iPET-, and 3 (5.5%) pts did not have iPET. In the 5 pts with EN disease and iPET+, all received IFRT and 1 progressed. There were 50 pt deaths. Of these, cause of death was lymphoma in 16 (32%), second cancer in 6 (12%), other in 15 (30%), and unknown in 13 (26%). Conclusions Patients with LS DLBCL treated on 3 SWOG studies had excellent and prolonged PFS and OS regardless of EN versus nodal presentation, or whether they received consolidative IFRT or not. Our dataset does not support EN disease as an adverse prognostic factor for pts with LS DLBCL. As such, we do not recommend consolidation with radiotherapy in pts with non-bulky LS DLBCL presenting with EN disease. There were too few patients with EN disease treated on S1001 that had iPET+ to make a recommendation for PET-adapted IFRT. The majority of pts in our dataset had EN disease of the head & neck, which appears to have similar survival as nodal presentation. As seen in previous studies, there was a continuous rate of relapse without plateau of the PFS curves. Most common known cause of death in was lymphoma, which supports the need for long term follow-up. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Stephens: Celgene: Consultancy; Mingsight: Research Funding; Arqule: Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JUNO: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Beigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Leonard: ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Epizyme, Inc., Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Karyopharm, BMS/Celgene, Regeneron, MEI Pharma, Miltenyi, Roche/Genentech, Sutro: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy. Kahl: Abbvie, ADCT, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene, Teva, Janssen, MTEM, Bayer, InCyte, Adaptive, Genentech, Roche, MEI, KITE, TG Therapeutics, Epizyme, Takeda: Consultancy; Abbvie, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Acerta: Research Funding; Research to Practice: Speakers Bureau. Smith: Celgene, Genetech, AbbVie: Consultancy; Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Other: Study investigator. Friedberg: Bayer: Other: DSMC ; Novartis: Other: DSMC ; Acerta: Other: DSMC . OffLabel Disclosure: ibritumomab tiuxetan is not FDA approved for marketing in DLBCL

scholarly journals Longer Term Follow up of the  Randomized Phase III Trial SWOG S0777: Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT)

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1992-1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian GM Durie ◽  
Antje Hoering ◽  
Rachael Sexton ◽  
Muneer H. Abidi ◽  
Joshua Epstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Phase Iii Trial

Abstract Background: SWOG S0777, a randomized phase III trial, compared bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) using a pre-specified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0.02. The stratification factors were International Staging System (ISS) stage (I, II or III) and intent to transplant (yes or no), among a total of 6 strata. Overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary end points. Results of the primary analysis of this trial were published in Lancet (2016, Volume 389, Issue 10068, 519 - 527). Methods: This updated analysis includes 460 patients evaluable for survival endpoints: 225 eligible and analyzable patients were randomized to Rd and 235 patients to VRd. Rd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg/day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of a 28-day cycle. VRd patients received lenalidomide 25 mg/day on days 1-14 and dexamethasone 20/mg/day on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11 and 12 plus bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 IV push on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/day and VRd patients received VZV prophylaxis per institutional standard. The 6-month induction was six 28-day cycles of Rd and eight 21-day cycles of VRd followed by Rd maintenance for all patients until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Results: Between 2008 and 2012, 525 patients from 48 institutions were randomized. Patient data have been rigorously updated for this analysis based upon a May 15, 2018 datalock. The median follow up is now 84 months (7 years). The median PFS is 41 months for VRd and 29 months for Rd: stratified hazard ratio (96% Wald Confidence Interval) was 0.742 (0.594, 0.928) and one-sided stratified log-rank P-value 0.003 (see Figure 1). The median OS for VRd is still not reached with median OS for Rd being 69 months: stratified hazard ratio (96% Wald Confidence Interval) was 0.709 (0.543, 0.926) and stratified two-sided P-value was 0.0114 (see Figure 2). The impact of age was assessed in several ways including using 3 cutoffs (<65 years; 65-75 years; >75 years) and multivariate cox proportional hazards regression analyses adjusted for age. As in prior analyses, both PFS and OS were improved with VRd versus Rd adjusting for age (P-values: 0.013 [PFS]; 0.033 [OS])). Depth of response was assessed incorporating new serial data and additional bone marrow results. The CR plus VGPR was 74.9% for VRd versus CR plus VGPR of 53.7% for Rd (P-value 0.006 for response differences using a stratified Cochran-Mantel- Haenszel analysis). The median duration of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone maintenance was 17.4 months. The number of second cancers was 19/235 (8%) with VRd and 16/225 (7%) with Rd. Conclusion: The addition of bortezomib to lenalidomide dexamethasone for induction therapy in previously untreated myeloma results in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS as well as better OS with follow up of 7 years. VRd had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile and continues to represent an appropriate standard of care irrespective of age. Disclosures Durie: Takeda: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy. Abidi:Millenium Takeda: Research Funding. Epstein:University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences: Employment. Dispenzieri:Celgene, Takeda, Prothena, Jannsen, Pfizer, Alnylam, GSK: Research Funding. Reu:Bristol Myers Squibb: Employment; Millenium Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Orlowski:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BioTheryX, Inc: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Barlogie:Dana Farber Cancer Institute: Other: travel stipend; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: Other: travel stipend; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Other: travel stipend; European School of Haematology- International Conference on Multiple Myeloma: Other: travel stipend; Myeloma Health, LLC: Patents & Royalties: : Co-inventor of patents and patent applications related to use of GEP in cancer medicine licensed to Myeloma Health, LLC; ComtecMed- World Congress on Controversies in Hematology: Other: travel stipend; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document