scholarly journals Encouraging Outcomes in African-American Patients with Use of Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide after HLA Mismatched Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3228-3228
Author(s):  
David H. Aggen ◽  
Kendra Mellert ◽  
Divaya Bhutani ◽  
Lois Ayash ◽  
Lawrence G. Lum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
African American ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract An inherent difficulty in performing allogeneic transplantation in patients (pts) of African American (AA) descent is finding suitably matched 8/8 unrelated donors. In addition for complicated reasons studies have shown that AA have an inferior survival compared to suitable matched patients from different ethnic groups undergoing allogeneic transplantation. Post transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) administered on day + 3 and +4 given in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) allows for the safe use of more mismatched transplants, including haploidentical transplants. This has created a new approach for patients who lack suitable donors and may allow more AA pts to proceed to transplant. At our institution, we have used PTCy as graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) from mismatched related and unrelated donors, and this group consisted largely of high-risk AA pts. We retrospectively reviewed 16 pts who underwent HLA mismatched HSCT (5/10 to 8/10 HLA matches) at our institution between July 2012 and 2015. All patients received RIC HSCT with PTCy (days +3 and +4) along with tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Patients did not routinely receive growth factor support. Primary endpoints included time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, length of hospital stay, and rates of acute and chronic GVHD. Secondary outcomes included time to relapse, transplant related mortality, and overall survival. Table 1 shows the demographics of the 16 patients who were transplanted. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range: 25-72). Ten pts were of AA descent. Fifteen donors were haploidentical family donors; 6 were 5/10 matches, 4 were 6/10 matches, and 5 were 7/10 matches. One patient received a 8/10 unrelated donor transplant. Five patients had failed previous transplants which included 3 allogeneic and 2 autologous HSCT. Based on published risk stratification (Armand et al. Blood, 2012) of the remaining 11 pts, 7 pts were high risk and 4 were intermediate risk. Neutrophil engraftment (first of 3 days when ANC was ³500 cells/mm3) occurred a median of 19 days post transplant (range:12-22 days); Platelet engraftment (³20,000/µL without platelet transfusion) occurred a median of 21.5 days post-transplant (range: 14-37 days). Median length of hospitalization was 26 days (range: 22-81 days). Two pts failed to engraft after first HSCT. One of these pts had high levels of anti-HLA antibodies directed against her donor. Both pts went on to a second haploidentical transplant and engrafted their neutrophil counts at 13 days and 21 days; respectively. Grade II acute GVHD occurred in 6/16 patients. No patient developed grade III-IV aGVHD. Chronic GVHD was observed in 8/16 patients with severe chronic GVHD seen in one patient. With a median follow up of 160 days (range: 89-778 days) the Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival at one year were 81.3% for all transplanted pts (Figure 1) and 80% for the AA pts (Figure 2). Three pts died; 1 patient from an invasive fungal infection and 2 pts from relapse. One additional patient relapsed but continues on treatment. Our experience suggests that the use of PTCy permits HLA mismatched transplantation, with overall survival of > 80% and acceptable rates of acute and chronic GVHD. Moreover, the severity of acute GVHD in patients who received PTCy post-transplant was limited, with no reported acute grade III-IV GVHD. In addition, the early outcomes of HLA mismatched transplantation in 10 African-American patients, a population that is often underrepresented in the donor registry, suggests that this approach may preferentially benefit AA pts from an expanded donor pool derived from utilization of partially HLA-matched donors. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Figure 3. Figure 3. Disclosures Lum: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Equity Ownership; Transtarget.Inc: Equity Ownership. Deol:Bristol meyer squibb: Research Funding.

Treatment of AML in First Remission (CR1) with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) Using Unrelated Donors (UD).

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 976-976
Author(s):  
Leandro de Padua Silva ◽  
Borje S. Andersson ◽  
Uday Popat ◽  
Lori Griffin ◽  
Michele Alvarez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Hla Typing ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Stem Cell Source ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Engraftment Failure

Abstract Introduction/Methods: A key component of improving the success rate of allogeneic HSCT for AML in CR1 is to reduce non-relapse mortality (NRM), which, if excessive, will deny the benefit of the graft-versus-leukemia effect. UD HSCT has traditionally been associated with high NRM rates. We reported previously on the significant reduction of NRM using the conditioning regimen of fludarabine 40mg/m2, IV busulfan 130 mg/m2 for 4 days and thymoglobulin. Here we analyze the outcomes of all patients (n=37) with AML in CR1 treated with this regimen and UD HSCT in our institution from January 2002 to December 2007. High-resolution allele level HLA typing was performed for all donorrecipient pairs for HLA-A, -B, -C, DRB1 and DQB1; up to one mismatch was allowed (9/10). Median follow up is 30 months (range, 9–72). Results: Median age was 48 years (range, 13–68); 30% (n=11) were older than 54 years and 51% (n=19) were male. Eleven patients (30%) had secondary AML. Prognostic cytogenetics classification was poor and intermediate in 53% and 47% of the cases, respectively. Stem cell source was bone marrow (BM) in 68% (n=25) and peripheral blood (PB) in 32% (n=12). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate with and without pentostatin (1 or 1.5 mg/m2 on days 8, 15, 22 and 30) in 46% (n=17) and 54% of the cases (n=20), respectively. Donor-recipient HLA match was 9/10 and 10/10 in 14% and 86% of the cases. Median infused total nucleated and CD34+ cells was 3.72 x 108 (range, 0.57 – 11.78) and 3.77 x 106 (range, 0.45 – 12.4), respectively. Median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was 12 days (range, 8–18) and 14 days (range, 8–101), respectively. All but one patient engrafted. Grade II–IV acute (a) GVHD rate was 13% (n=2) and 50% (n=10) for patients that received and not received pentostatin-based prophylaxis. Grade III–IV aGVHD rate was 0% versus 15% (n=3) for patients receiving and not receiving pentostatin. Chronic GVHD was diagnosed in 55% (n=18) of all patients (extensive in 10). 100-day and 3-year NRM rate was 11% (n=4) and 20% (n=4), respectively, and was due to engraftment failure (n=1) and aGVHD (n=3). Eight patients (22%) have relapsed, and 8 (22%) have died (4 of relapse, and 4 of NRM causes). Relapse rate was 18% (3/17) and 25% (5/20) for patients that received and not received pentostatin as part of GVHD prophylaxis. Actuarial 3-year event-free and overall survival (figure) is 68% and 78%, respectively. Actuarial 3-year overall survival for patients receiving BM and PB is 80% and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: Long-term disease control can be achieved in a significant fraction of high-risk AML patients undergoing UD transplants as described in this abstract. Use of pentostatin in this context deserves further prospective evaluation. Figure Figure

Long-Term Follow-up of Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Received Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2154-2154
Author(s):  
Michele L. Donato ◽  
David S Siegel ◽  
David H. Vesole ◽  
Phyllis McKiernan ◽  
Themba Nyirenda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Unrelated Donors

Abstract Allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma (mm), although seen as potentially curative, has inherent treatment-related mortality and long-term implications. Important questions remain such as the expectation for long-term survival and the role, if any, of the graft versus tumor effect. The study cohort included 56 consecutive patients (pts) with mm who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) between November 9, 2004 and June 1st 2011. Only pts who had received at least one prior autologous transplant were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients received either a non-myeloablative (NMA), a reduced intensity (RIC) or an ablative (MA) regimen. The NMA regimen consisted of low dose TBI for siblings and low dose TBI with fludarabine for unrelated donors. The RIC regimen was fludarabine melphalan, with the addition of low dose thymoglobulin for unrelated donors. The MA regimen was busulfan and melphalan, with thymoglobulin for unrelated donors. A favorable group of 26 pts received their allogeneic transplantation for consolidation after demonstrating a response (PR, VGPR, CR) to their prior autograft and without evidence of progression, leaving 30 pts in the salvage transplant group defined as pts unresponsive (less than PR) or with relapse after their prior autograft. The median age was 52.4 years (SD = 6.9 years). Twenty six (46%) pts were female. The hematopoietic cell donors were 35 siblings and 21 unrelated (URD). In the URD group, 10 (47.6%) pts had a mismatched donor. In our cohort 10 (17.9%) pts received a MA, 22 (39.3%) received a RIC and 24 (42.9%) received a NMA regimen. The median follow-up was 52 months. The related and unrelated donor cohorts were similar except for age (53.9 years versus 49.8 years p = 0.03). Overall, 32 (57.1%) pts achieved a CR. Seven (12.5%) pts had a VGPR, 13 (23.2%) had a PR and 2 (3.6%) had stable disease. At the time of analysis, 49.2% of pts were in CR. Twenty one (37.5%) pts relapsed post transplantation of whom 16 received donor lymphocytes (DLI 15 pts) or immune suppression withdrawal (1 pt), with 10 (62.5%) pts responding to this intervention. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV was 35.4%, 28.6% for related donors and 47.6% for URD (p = 0.16). The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 50%, 52% for related donors and 43% for URD (p=NS). The number of non-relapse deaths (NRM) was 13 (23.2%). The cumulative incidence of NRM at 1 year was 18.2%, and 25.5% at 5 years. In the multivariate model, number of prior autologous HSCT (1 vs >1) and grade III-IV aGVHD were significantly associated with an increased NRM. The overall survival (OS) for all 56 pts was 59% at 5 years. The OS at 5 years for the 30 pts who received transplantation as salvage (refractory to the prior autograft or relapsed after the prior autograft), was 38% compared to 82% for the consolidation group. The univariate analysis indicates that pts receiving their allogeneic transplantation as salvage, disease status prior to allogeneic HSCT, number of prior auto HSCT, aGVHD, response post allo HSCT and cGVHD were significantly associated with the risk of all cause mortality, with cGVHD being protective. Donor type (URD versus related), adverse cytogenetics, preparative regimen and age were not significant predictors of risk for all cause mortality by univariate analysis.Overall survival salvage (yes) vs consolidation group (no)Overall survival salvage (yes) vs consolidation group (no)Overall survival pts with (yes) or without (no) chronic GVHDOverall survival pts with (yes) or without (no) chronic GVHD Multivariate analysis shows OS significance for being in the salvage group (HR 4.05, p=0.0196), a GVHD (HR 2.99, p=0.034) and cGVHD (HR 0.26, p=0.012), the latter being protective. The PFS for all 56 pts was 38% at 5 years, 57% for the consolidation group and 21% for the salvage group. In conclusion, patients with multiple myeloma can have an excellent overall survival following allogeneic transplantation even in the setting of relapsed or refractory disease to a prior auto HSCT. Unrelated donors performed just as well as matched siblings. Acute GVHD was deleterious to OS, whereas chronic GVHD was significantly associated with improvement in OS supporting the role of a graft versus tumor effect in multiple myeloma. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Cyclosporine Versus Cyclosporine/Mycophenolate Mofetil for GVHD Prophylaxis after Matched Related and Unrelated Minimal Intensity Allotransplantation.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 5014-5014
Author(s):  
Robert P. Nelson ◽  
Jennifer E. Schwartz ◽  
Menggang Yu ◽  
Michael Robertson ◽  
Paul R. Haut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Mycophenolate Mofetil ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of cyclosporine (CsA) alone versus CsA/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis in older patients who received a minimally-intensive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (MIHCT) for the treatment of hematological malignancies (AML=26, MDS=15, NHL=8, CLL=5, MM=3, HD=4, CML=1, ALL=1). Patients (median age, 55 years; 41 males, 22 females) received HLA-matched related (n=33) or unrelated (n=30) peripheral blood hematopoietic cell infusions following immunosuppressive dosages of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine (Childs R, et al. Blood 94; 1999). The initial 28 consecutive patients received monitored CsA from day −1 through day +180 (if no GVHD). The next 35 subjects received CsA/MMF: CsA, day −1 through day +180 and MMF, 1000 mg twice daily, day +1 through day +60 (if no GVHD, then a taper). Patients were followed until death or at least 7 months. There were no differences between recipients of MRD and MUD transplants with respect to sex, age of the recipient, disease status, ABO matching, recipient CMV status or number of CMV-negative donor/recipient pairs. MUD donors were significantly younger and more likely to be CMV-negative. There was no difference in disease distribution between those who recieved CsA and those who recieved CsA/MMF prophylaxis. Follow-up ranged from 25–2241 days (median, 461 days for the CSA group; 449 days for the CSA/MMF group, 1290 days for survivors). All patients engrafted without growth factor support and no subjects experienced sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, mucositis or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease. Thirty and 100-day transplant-related mortality for the cohort was 1.6% and 15.9% respectively. The incidence of Grade 2–4 aGVHD (n=63) was 49.2% (CsA, 57.1%, CsA/MMF, 42.9%, p=0.315). Grade 3 or 4 aGVHD occurred in 30% (CsA, 32.1%, CsA/MMF, 28.6%, p=0.788). Chronic extensive GVHD occurred in 53.8% (CsA, 61.5%, CsA/MMF, 46.2%, p=0.404) of at risk (survival greater than 100 days) recipients. The incidence of acute or chronic GVHD was not statistically different for MRD versus MUD recipients for either prophylaxis group (p=0.32 and 0.23, respectively). One-year, two-year and three-year overall Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were estimated to be 60.7%, 42.9% (CsA group) and 42.9%and 60%, 45.2% and 32.8% (CsA/MMF group, 0.708). Twenty-seven (42.9%) of the entire cohort are alive at a median of 1290 days post-transplant [CSA, 12/28, (42.9%); CsA/MMF, 15/35, (42.9%)]. Grade 3 or 4 aGVHD was associated with poor overall survival (p=0.0001) for the cohort. These findings provide evidence that MMF does not seem to provide substantial GVHD preventive or overall survival benefit when added to CsA after matched related/unrelated cyclophosphamide/fludarabine MIHCT in older patients with hematological malignancies.

A Novel Chemotherapy-Based Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Regimen for Very Young Children with Leukemia.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3149-3149
Author(s):  
Susan E. Prockop ◽  
Nancy A. Kernan ◽  
Elizabeth G Klein ◽  
Rachel Kobos ◽  
Andromachi Scaradavou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Post Transplant

Abstract Abstract 3149 Young children in need of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) are at increased risk of unacceptable side effects from total body irradiation (TBI) and have historically been considered candidates for non-TBI containing regimens. However, disease free survival (DFS) has been poorer in cohorts of very young patients transplanted without TBI and novel chemotherapy based regimens are needed. We report results in a cohort of 14 children all under three years of age at the time of transplant (6 – 32 months; median 19.8 months) using a clofarabine-based ablative regimen. Fourteen patients in this age group have undergone transplant with a regimen consisting of clofarabine 20 mg/m2/day × 5, thiotepa 10 mg/Kg/day × 1 and melphalan 70 mg/m2/day × 2. All patients had high risk disease. Seven (7) pts were transplanted for ALL, 6 for AML and 1 for JMML. Patients with ALL or AML in first remission (CR1) or CR2, were categorized as patients with good risk disease while all other pts were considered as poor risk irrespective of all other factors. Transplant risk was good for 6/7 with ALL, and 3/6 with AML. The patient with JMML had stable disease. Stem cell grafts consisted of unmodified bone marrow (BMT) (N=6), double cord blood (dCBT) (N=7) and T cell depleted PBSCT (N=1). Donors were matched unrelated (N=5) or mismatched unrelated (N=9) including 7 double umbilical cord blood grafts, and one T cell depleted graft. Graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis was with tacrolimus and methotrexate for unmodified BMT, tacrolimus and mycophenolate for dCBT or T cell depleted HSCT. Two patients died early post transplant of infection (1) and acute GvHD (1). Neutrophil engraftment for the 13 evaluable patients was at a median of 13 days (10 –29 days) for PBSC and BM grafts and 17.5 days (12 –23 days) for recipients of CB grafts. Platelet engraftment for the 12 evaluable patients was at a median of 23 days (16 – 36 days) for recipients of PBSC and BM grafts and 43.5 days (36 –66 days) for recipients of CB grafts. In all five patients developed grade II-IV GvHD, and two patients chronic GvHD. Seven patients developed transaminitis which resolved in all cases. No patients developed Grade IV mucositis. One patient (AML) died after relapsing 5.5 months post transplant. Two patients are alive after relapsing at 1.3 months (AML) and 10.8 months (JMML) post-transplant. Nine of the 14 patients are alive in continuous complete remission seven of whom are greater than 36 months from transplant (40.2 – 71 months). The seven patients without chronic GvHD have had robust immune reconstitution, have responded to vaccination, and continue to meet growth and developmental milestones. Only one patient (transplanted at 14 months of age) has mild neurocognitive deficits. This novel chemotherapy based regimen is associated with durable engraftment of unmodified and cord blood HSCT grafts and promising disease free survival in very young children with leukemia. Based on the low toxicity profile in this cohort of patients higher dosing of clofarabine will be explored as a possible way to improve leukemia remission in the highest risk patients. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Clofarabine.

Long-Term Survival In Patients With Acute Steroid Refractory Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (SR-GVHD) Treated With Infliximab Combined With Daclizumab

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4624-4624
Author(s):  
Sanaz Nicky Soltani ◽  
Ramaprasad Srinivasan ◽  
Theresa Jerussi ◽  
A. John Barrett ◽  
Thomas E Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Probability ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Post Transplant

Acute SR-GVHD occurs in approximately 15% of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and is associated with a 70-90% long-term mortality rate. We previously reported that concomitant blockade of TNF-α and IL-2 pathways with infliximab combined with daclizumab have a synergistic therapeutic effect, with a high probability of complete resolution of SR-GVHD. Although various treatment modalities are effective in the treatment of SR-GVHD, minimal long-term follow up data exists for complete responders to second line treatments. Here we report long-term outcomes in a cohort of 23 subjects developing SR-GVHD treated with infliximab/daclizumab. A consecutive series of 141 patients with a variety of hematological and non-hematological malignancies as well as nonmalignant hematological disorders including severe aplastic anemia (SAA), paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and pure red cells aplasia, underwent a reduced intensity allogeneic HSCT from an HLA identical or single antigen mismatched relative at a single institution between 2/2001 and 12/2008. Transplant conditioning consisted of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg days -7, -6) and fludarabine (25 mg/m2days -5 to -1) with or without equine ATG or 6-12 Gy of total body irradiation. GVHD prophylaxis was with cyclosporine with or without additional MMF or MTX. Twenty three patients (median age 35 years, range 13-65 years) developed SR-GVHD at a median of 28 days post transplant. SR-GVHD was defined as absence of response to at least 6 days of high dose methylprednisolone therapy. Following a diagnosis of SR-GVHD, patients received a combination of daclizumab (1mg/kg given on days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22), infliximab (10mg/kg given on days 1, 8, 15, 22), broad spectrum bacterial and anti-fungal prophylaxis, and had their methylprednisolone tapered to 1mg/kg/day. Combined cytokine blockade was highly active against SR-GVHD, with 21/23 (87.5%) patients achieving a complete response (CR), defined as total resolution of GVHD in all involved organ systems. All complete responders survived to hospital discharge. With a median follow-up of 9 years (range 5-10 years), 9/23 (39%) survive, including 6 patients without chronic GVHD whose immunosuppressive therapy (IST) has been discontinued and 3 patients with chronic GVHD (2 limited and 1 extensive) who continue to be tapered off IST. Fourteen of 21 patients with resolution of SR-GVHD died a median 173 days post transplant (range 67-1039 days), including 1 from complications related to recurrent SR-GVHD, 6 from progression of malignancy (all solid tumors), 2 from bleeding related to peptic ulcer disease and 5 from infectious complications including invasive fungal infection and CMV disease. A subgroup analysis showed 5/6 patients with SAA developing SR-GVHD had a complete response to combined infliximab/daclizimab. Remarkably, at a median 6 years follow up, 67% (4/6) of these SAA patients were long-term survivors. All these survivors have maintained normal blood counts and remained transfusion independent with 100% donor chimerism in myeloid and T-cell lineages. Conclusion Patients with SR-GVHD treated with infliximab combined with daclizumab had a high probability of achieving a complete response with nearly 40% of patients having long-term survival. This is the first report to show that long-term survival can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients receiving combined IL-2 and TNF blockade for SR-GVHD. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Infliximab is FDA approved for the treatment of psoriasis, Crohn's disease, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Daclizumab gained FDA approval for use in transplant rejection.

Treatment with Hypomethylating Agents before Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Improves Survival for Patients with Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4347-4347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piyanuch Kongtim ◽  
Uday R. Popat ◽  
Antonio M. Jimenez ◽  
Sameh Gabella ◽  
Riad O. El Fakih ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Hypomethylating Agents ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Conditioning Regimens

Abstract Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) is the only curative treatment modality for patients with CMML. Here we retrospectively reviewed the data for patients with CMML who received an all-SCT at our institution to identify factors associated with improved survival and determine whether treatment with hypomethylating agents (HMA) before transplant improves survival for these patients. Methods All 83 patients 18 years of age or older with a diagnosis of CMML confirmed at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center who underwent allo-SCT between April 1991 and December 2013 were identified through review of the institutionÕs medical records and included in this analysis. Forty, 7, and 36 patients had CMML-1, CMML-2 and CMML that had progressed to AML (CMML/AML) respectively. The median age was 57 years. CMML specific cytogenetic risk at diagnosis (Such E, hematologica, 2011) was good, intermediate, and high risk in 46, 19, and 18 patients respectively. Seventy-eight patients received induction treatment before transplant, 37 receiving HMA (either 5-azacytidine or decitabine) for at least 3 courses and 41 receiving 1-2 courses of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Among the patients who received induction therapy, 15 patients in HMA group and 9 patients in convention chemotherapy group achieved a complete remission before transplant. Thirty, 47 and 6 patients received transplants from matched related donors (MRD), matched unrelated donors (MUD), and mismatched related or unrelated donors (MMD), respectively. The sources of hematopoietic stem cells were peripheral blood for 48 patients (57.8%) and bone marrow for 35 patients (42.2%). Conditioning regimens varied; most patients received either fludarabine in combination with busulfan or fludarabine combined with melphalan. Sixty-four patients received myeloablative and 19 patients received reduced intensity conditioning regimens. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and methotrexate. Patient and transplant characteristics did not significantly differ between the patients treated with HMA and the patients treated with conventional chemotherapy or given supportive care alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), Treatment related mortality (TRM), relapse incidence through last follow-up and incidences of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. All of these outcomes were measured from the time of allo-SCT. Results Median follow up duration for 29 survivors was 48 months. Seventy-five patients engrafted (90.4%) with median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 13 and 15 days respectively. Patients treated with a HMA had a significantly lower cumulative incidence (CI) of relapse at 3 years post-transplant (22%) than those treated with other agents (35%; p=0.03), whereas TRM at 1 year post-transplantdid not significantly differ between the groups (27% and 30%, respectively; p=0.84). Acute GVHD all grades and grade 2-4 were seen in 28.2% versus 35.8% (p=0.05) and 12.8% versus 11.3% (p=0.72) in patients who received a HMA compared to those who treated with other agents respectively. CI of chronic GVHD was 35% in patients treated with a HMA versus 19.2% in those treated with other agents (p=0.36) while CI of chronic extensive GVHD was seen in only 26.7% versus 19.2% respectively (p=0.64). The lower relapse rate resulted in a significantly higher 3-year PFS rate in patients treated with a HMA (43%) than in those who received other treatments (27%; p=0.04) (Figure 1). However, therapy with HMA before transplant did not significantly influence the 3-year OS rate (45% in those treated with HMA and 39% in those treated with other agents; p=0.22). The independent prognostic factors for PFS were a blast count of < 5% before transplant (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.14-0.78), treatment with a HMA (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.86), a transplant from an MRD (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.94), development of grade 2-4 acute GVHD (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.27-5.77), and development of chronic GVHD (HR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05-0.45). Conclusion We conclude that treatment with hypomethylating agents before allo-SCT may improve survival in patients with CMML. Figure 1. Progression free survival Figure 1. Progression free survival Disclosures Alousi: Therakos, Inc: Research Funding. Andersson:Otsuka Research and Development, Inc.: Consultancy.

scholarly journals 581. Risks versus Benefits of Metronidazole Use for the Prevention of Acute GVHD in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S355-S356
Author(s):  
Mary T Young ◽  
Marguerite Monogue ◽  
Hetalkumari Patel
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Adverse Drug Events ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Allogeneic Hsct ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Cell Transplants

Abstract Background Currently, acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) varies amongst different institutions. There is a lack of data supporting the use of metronidazole for aGVHD prophylaxis in HSCT. To further investigate if metronidazole has an effect on aGVHD, allogeneic HSCT recipients will be examined to determine if metronidazole post-transplantation decreases the incidence of aGVHD and the risks of adverse drug events (ADE) associated with this practice. Methods This retrospective study included 120 adult patients who received an allogeneic HSCT between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013. The primary endpoint is the incidence of aGVHD, defined as within 100 days post-transplant. Secondary endpoints include the rate of metronidazole discontinuation due to intolerance, frequency of metronidazole-related adverse effects, incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection, mortality, and overall survival. Results One hundred six patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients received metronidazole (88 vs. 18). Less patients in the metronidazole arm developed aGHVD (51.1% vs 61.1%, p=0.44). In the subcategories of liver, skin, and gastrointestinal aGHVD, patients who received metronidazole developed less gastrointestinal aGVHD (26.1% vs 50.0%, p=0.045). Gastrointestinal ADEs were the most common metronidazole-related ADEs (19.3%, Table 1). There were no significant differences in the incidence of C. difficile infection, mortality, and overall survival between the two arms (Table 2). Table 1. Adverse Drug Events and Discontinuation of Therapy Table 2. Additional Secondary Outcomes Conclusion Despite a reduction in gastrointestinal aGVHD in the metronidazole arm, approximately one in four patients experienced an ADE to the medication, likely due to the prolonged use of the medication (33 days). The utilization of post-transplant cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis likely eliminates the need for metronidazole; however our findings suggest a benefit in preventing gastrointestinal aGVHD with metronidazole; albeit, caution is warranted given the high incidence of ADE associated with prolonged use. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Outcomes of COVID-19 in Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Recipients: A Single Institution Observational Study

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4896-4896
Author(s):  
Sami Dwabe ◽  
Lakshmi Savitala-Damerla ◽  
Jack Rodman ◽  
Abdullah Ladha ◽  
Eric Tam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Publicly Traded ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Privately Held

Abstract Intro: Hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) recipients are considered to be at high risk for poor outcomes following COVID-19 infection given their co-morbidities and immunosuppression. Sharma et al published the CIBMTR observational report data that showed that recipients of allogeneic HSCT who contract COVID-19 have poor overall survival with a 30-day mortality of 32%. That being said, there have been relatively few studies that look into the effect of COVID-19 on HSCT recipients in the setting of in vivo T cell depletion protocols. With the increased use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) based GVHD prophylaxis regimens for our match related and match unrelated HSCT recipients since 2018 at our institution, we are interested to see if our COVID-19 outcomes differ from those published in the CIBMTR report. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective analysis evaluating outcomes of HSCT recipients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 2020 and April 2021. Patients 18 years or older who underwent HSCT and subsequently contracted COVID-19 were included in the data collection. Demographic data including age, type of hematologic malignancy, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis, date of COVID-19 infection, with pre- and post-COVID-19 infection labs were obtained. Our primary endpoint in this retrospective analysis was non-relapse mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: There were 21 patients at our institution who had undergone HSCT and subsequently contracted COVID-19. The most common primary disease types were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (33.3%), acute myeloid leukemia (23.8%), and myelodysplastic syndrome (19.0%). The median age of our patient population was 53 years (range, 24-66). 6 of the patients received match related allografts. 7 received cells from match unrelated donors. 7 received cells from haploidentical donors. 1 patient had received an autologous stem cell transplant. Of the remaining 20 allo-HSCT recipients, 14 of them (70.0%) received myeloablative conditioning regimens, whereas 6 (30.0%) received reduced intensity or non-myeloablative regimens. Our GVHD prophylaxis regimens were PTCy/Tacro/MMF (12 pts, 60.0%) and Tacro/MTX (8 pts, 40.0%). Patient demographics and outcomes are found on Tables 1 and 2. Our patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 a median 469 days post-transplant, with 8 patients (38.1%) diagnosed with COVID-19 within 1 year of transplant. 11 of the patients (52.4%) received steroids following their diagnosis with COVID-19. Of the 20 allo-HSCT recipients with confirmed COVID-19 infection, 1 passed away 20 days after the diagnosis was made. This gives us a 5.0% case fatality rate attributable to COVID-19 in our population in our allo-HSCT population. 16 of the 20 patients were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis (80.0%). 7 of the 20 patients (35.0%) were hospitalized for a median of 7 days (range, 5-17 days), with 2 requiring ICU level of care. The one patient who passed away tested positive for COVID-19 177 days post-transplant and was hospitalized approximately 7 days after diagnosis, where he was intubated on hospital day 4 and ultimately passed away on hospital day 13. The patient had received Tacro/MTX for GVHD prophylaxis. Discussion: Although this is a small sample size, our data suggests that our allo-HSCT recipients who contracted COVID-19 have had generally good short-term outcomes. Our study is limited by the small number of patients who got infected with COVID-19, particularly those within 1-year post-transplant. Furthermore, we acknowledge it is difficult to claim that the PTCy based GVHD prophylaxis regimens for our HSCT recipients were solely responsible for their improved outcomes since 40% of allo-HSCT recipients did not get PTCy for GVHD prophylaxis. However, we believe it would be valuable to evaluate in a prospective analysis. We are currently evaluating if a COVID-19 diagnosis has any effect on long term transplant related complications and outcomes in this population. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Chaudhary: Angeles Therapeutics: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Founder, Patents & Royalties: Cell therapy ; Celldex: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Moderna: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pancella: Consultancy; Oncotartis: Consultancy; Athelas: Consultancy, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company; TCR2: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Allogene: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Yaghmour: Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

scholarly journals Predictors of Outcomes in Adult Patients with Therapy Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - Twenty Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Centre

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 5737-5737
Author(s):  
RAM V Nampoothiri ◽  
Arjun Law ◽  
Wilson Lam ◽  
Zeyad Al-Shaibani ◽  
David Loach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Related Mortality ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background Therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) constitutes a subset of AML that has an increased proportion of high risk cytogenetic and molecular features, poor response to therapy, higher relapse, and decreased overall survival. The incidence ranges from 10-20% across various studies. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) offers a potential cure in t-AML, with disease free survival reported up to 30% at 2 years. Most studies on HSCT in t-AML have limited number of patients and are confounded by the inclusion of patients with secondary AML and therapy related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS). We aim to report our 20-year experience of allo-HSCT in t-AML and identify predictors of survival. Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed all cases of t-AML who underwent allo-HSCT at our centre from June 1999 to July 2019. We collected data for demographic characteristics, prior malignancy and treatment, latent period before AML, cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of AML, induction treatment received, transplant details (donor details, conditioning regimens, GVHD prophylaxis) as well as post-transplant complications (transplant related mortality, occurrence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD, CMV and EBV reactivations). Primary outcome evaluated was overall survival and secondary outcomes were relapse rate and relapse free survival (RFS). Cox-proportional hazards regression model was used to identify predictors of survival. Results Fifty-two patients underwent allo-HSCT for t-AML during the study period. 58% were male (n=30). Median age at HSCT was 55.5 years (Range 18-70). Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Complex cytogenetics were present in 23.2% (n=12) patients, while 11q23 rearrangement (MLL-KMT2A), monosomy 7, monosomy 5, and 17p deletion were present in 15.4% (n = 8), 15.4% (n= 8), 7.7% (n = 4) and 7.7% (n=4) patients respectively. Based on the ELN 2017 risk stratification schema, 13.5% (n=7) patients could be considered favorable risk based on cytogenetic and molecular profiles, 36.5% (n=19) intermediate risk, and 57.7% (n=30) in poor risk category. Performance status prior to transplant was ECOG 0/1 in 71.2% (n=37) patients, and 2 in 28.8% (n=15) patients. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 30.8% (n=16) patients, and reduced intensity conditioning in 69.2% (n=36). GVHD prophylaxis was CyclosporineA(CSA)/Methotrexate in 23.1% (n=12), Alemtuzumab/CSA in 21.2% (n=11), ATG/CSA/PTCy in 28.8% (n=15), and other regimens in 26.9% (n=14) patients. Transplant related mortality (death before day+100) was 21.1% (n=11). Acute and chronic GVHD (any grade) occurred in 61.5% (n = 32) and 28.8% (n=15) patients respectively. Eleven patients (21.2%) relapsed with a median RFS of 8 months (Range 0.17-158). Median OS of the whole cohort was 8.9 months (0.17-158 months). No patient had a relapse of their primary malignancy during follow up. RFS at 12 and 24 months were 46% and 28% while OS at 1 and 2 years was 46% and 30%, respectively. Significant predictors of reduced OS (Figure 1a,b,c) after day+100 of HSCT by Cox-regression were ECOG performance status 2 (Hazard ratio - 6.1; p value 0.003), GVHD prophylaxis with CSA/methotrexate (HR - 4.5; p value 0.01), and haploidentical donor transplantation (HR - 34; p value - 0.002). Cytogenetics were a predictor of OS in univariate analysis but not in multivariate regression analysis. No difference in OS was found between patients who underwent HSCT 2010 or prior versus after 2010. Conclusions Patients with favorable cytogenetic profile, better performance status, and an HLA matched donor may have better outcomes after allo-HSCT in therapy related AML. Patients with unfavorable cytogenetic risk profiles may require more intense therapy or post-transplant maintenance therapy to prevent relapse. Disclosures Michelis: CSL Behring: Other: Financial Support. Mattsson:Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria.

Reduced Severe aGVHD and Improved Survival Using Post Transplant Cyclophosphamide/Tacrolimus/Methotrexate Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis in AML Patients Receiving Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan Conditioning Regimen

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3296-3296
Author(s):  
Uday Popat ◽  
Rima M. Saliba ◽  
Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽  
Amanda L. Olson ◽  
Julianne Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis

Background: Myeloablative conditioning can be given safely to older patients by simply administering busulfan over a longer period (fractionated busulfan regimen) than the standard four day regimen. (Popat et al Lancet Haematology 2018). Subsequently, we added post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) GVHD prophylaxis to our fractionated regimen with a hypothesis that it will reduce GVHD and improve outcomes. Herein, we report the results of our retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of patients with AML who received fractionated busulfan myeloablative conditioning and PTCy versus standard tacrolimus (Tac) and methotrexate (Mtx) GVHD prophylaxis. Methods: Patients with AML between 18-70 years of age with adequate organ function and 8/8-HLA matched related or unrelated donor, who were treated on 4 consecutive protocols using fractionated busulfan were included in the analysis. All patients received two fixed doses of busulfan 80mg/m2 as outpatient either on days -13 and -12, or on days -20 and-13 followed by busulfan on day -6 to -3 dosed to achieve target area under the curve (AUC) of 20,000 mol/min for the whole course based on pharmacokinetic studies. Fludarabine ± cladribine were given on day -6 to -3. GVHD prophylaxis was PTCy 50mg/kg on days 3 and 4 and Tac ± mycophenolate mofetil in PTCy cohort (n=53), or standard Tac+ Mtx (n=53). Patients in both the cohorts were matched 1:1 by propensity score. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the PTCy and Tac/Mtx cohorts. The median age was 60 (range, 18-70) and 58 (range, 24-70) years, respectively, (P=0.3). Forty-nine percent were in CR, and 30% had comorbidity index >3 in each arm. Similar proportion of patients had ELN adverse risk in both arms (43% vs 40%, respectively P=0.7). The median follow up was 19 months (range, 3-36) in the PTCy and 46 months (range, 14-73) in Tac/Mtx cohort. Overall survival at 2-year was 78% vs 58% (P=0.03), non-relapse mortality was 6% vs 13% (P=0.2), incidence of grade 3-4 acute GVHD at 1-year was 6% vs 19% (P=0.07) and chronic GVHD at 2-year was 10% vs 29% (P=0.03) [Table 1 and figure 1]. The median time to neutrophil engraftment was prolonged by 3 days (15 vs 12 days; P<0.001) and platelet engraftment by 9 days (22 vs 13 days; P<0.001) in the PTCy cohort. Full donor chimerism at day 30 was noted in 79% vs 28% in the PTCy and Tac/Mtx cohorts respectively, (P<0.001). Conclusion: As compared to Tac/Mtx, PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis not only reduced severe acute GVHD and chronic GVHD, but also improved overall survival in AML patients up to the age of 70 years who received myeloablative fractionated busulfan conditioning. Prospective randomized trial is warranted to validate these findings. Disclosures Popat: Bayer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Bashir:Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ciurea:Kiadis Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: stock holder; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Miltenyi: Research Funding. Kebriaei:Kite: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy. Nieto:Astra-Zeneca: Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy; Affimed: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Oran:Astex pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AROG pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Genzyme: Other: Speaker; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Autolus: Consultancy; Bioclinical: Consultancy. Molldrem:M. D. Anderson & Astellas Pharma: Other: Royalties. Champlin:Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Sanofi-Genzyme: Research Funding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document