Fludarabine, Melphalan and Alemtuzumab Conditioned Reduced Intensity (RIC) Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adults Aged >40 Years with De Novo Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Prospective Study from the UKALL14 Trial (ISRCTN 66541317)

Abstract In the donor versus no donor analysis of the UKALL12/E2993 trial in adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), there was a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) and reduction in relapse in the donor arm. However the OS benefit did not extend to older patients in whom myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) related mortality was 35% at 2 years and outweighed the reduction in relapse risk. The overall outcome of older patients in this trial was poor, with patients >40 and 50 years having 23% and 15% 5 year survival respectively. In our current UK National Cancer Research Institute UKALL14 study all patients >40 years in CR, regardless of Philadelphia (Ph+) status and other high risk factors, are considered "high risk" and recommended a reduced intensity conditioned (RIC) alloHCT with a matched sibling (sib) or 8/8 matched unrelated donor (MUD) after a 2 course induction and high dose methotrexate. The primary endpoint is event free survival (EFS). We report here the early outcome of 88 patients with at least day 100 follow up (FU) (median FU 18 months) who received RICalloHCT on trial. Conditioning was with fludarabine 30mg/m2 d -6 to -2, melphalan 140 mg/m2 d -2 and alemtuzumab 30mg d -2 to-1 (MUD) or d-1 (sib). Graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was ciclosporin A only. Nine patients did not receive alemtuzumab as per protocol. Multilineage chimerism (MC) and minimal residual disease (MRD) were assessed 3 monthly post alloHSCT. Escalating doses of donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) were given for T-cell mixed chimerism or MRD, starting dose 1 x 106 CD3 cells/kg, escalating by half log increments every 3 months. Of 511 registered patients, 306 were >40 years old; 127 of those have completed RIC allograft, 88 of whom have sufficient FU to report. Median age was 51.5 years (range 41 to 64). Donor was sib in 24 and MUD in 64 patients, respectively. Median WBC at diagnosis was 7 x 109/l (0.6-557). Forty one of 77 (53%) evaluable patients had high risk cytogenetics, 22 (25%) were Ph+. Twelve of 56 (21%) with MRD data were MRD +ve pre-alloHCT. Post-alloHCT, myeloid engraftment occurred in 86/88 patients at a median of 13 days, 2 had missing data. Acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) occurred at grade 1 in 30 patients (34%) and grade 2-3 in 8 patients (9%). Thirty patients developed chronic GVHD (34% of 87/88 patients surviving to D100), 13 limited and 17 extensive. Of 12 patients who suffered transplant-related mortality (TRM), 6 died of infection (one post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease), 4 of organ toxicity and 2 of GVHD. TRM was not associated with age or donor type. Sixteen patients relapsed at a median time of 317 days (range 110-1034). Of those, 9 (of 15 with data) had high risk cytogenetics (EFS, p=0.38) and 6 (of 11 with data) were MRD +ve pre-alloHCT (EFS, HR 3.35, p=0.047). Twenty seven patients in total received 67 DLI (median maximum dose 3 x 106 CD3 cells/kg): 15 for mixed chimerism, 4 for rising MRD and 8 for both. Five patients (19%) developed post-DLI GVHD at grade 1 (n=4) and grade 2 (n=1). MC data is available for 36 patients receiving alemtuzumab and is shown in figure 1 where dark grey bars represent full and light grey bars mixed chimerism, respectively. DLI are denoted by black dashes. Mixed chimerism was seen in 22 of 36 patients (61%) who received alemtuzumab and so far 26 of 36 have achieved full donor chimerism (median 9 months), 10 after DLI (38%). Figure 2 shows Kaplan Meier curves of OS 76% (64-84, 95% CI) and EFS 68% (55-77)at 18 months. This is the first prospective study of RIC alloHCT in older adults with ALL; these early results demonstrate its feasibility within a large, multicentre trial. T-cell mixed chimerism was common at 1st MC assessment but early data indicate that conversion to full donor chimerism with DLI is a safe and realistic possibility. The impact of mixed chimerism (and pre-emptive DLI) on relapse remain to be evaluated. Severe GVHD and TRM were relatively low, such that the EFS of chemotherapy then RIC alloHCT, albeit with short-term FU, may be higher than expected for chemotherapy alone in this age group. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Copland: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Fielding:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

A Novel Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen Induces a High Incidence of Sustained Donor Neutrophil and Platelet Engraftment After Double-Unit Cord Blood Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4155.4155 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4155-4155

Author(s):

Doris M Ponce ◽

Craig S. Sauter ◽

Devlin Sean ◽

Marissa N Lubin ◽

Anne Marie R Gonzales ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Cord Blood ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

High Dose ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Myeloablative Conditioning ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 4155 Introduction: Cord blood (CB) transplant (CBT) can be curative for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. However, patients of older age and/or with significant co-morbidities do not tolerate CBT with high-dose myeloablative conditioning. Non-myeloablative (NMA) conditioning can reduce transplant-related mortality (TRM) and extend transplant access to older or infirm patients, but it is limited by the risks of graft rejection in patients without extensive prior chemotherapy and relapse. While the addition of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) may reduce rejection, it increases the risk of viral infections, including Epstein-Barr virus lymphoproliferative disease, and may also increase relapse risk. Methods: We investigated the safety and efficacy of an ATG-free regimen of intermediate intensity prior to double-unit CBT in 30 patients with acute leukemias and myelodysplasia. Units were 4–6/6 HLA-A, B antigen, DRB1 allele matched to the patient. The conditioning regimen included cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg (day -6), fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day × 5 (days -6 to -2), thiotepa 5 mg/kg/day × 2 (days -5 and -4), total body irradiation 200 cGy × 2 (days -2 and -1), and cyclosporine-A/mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression. The indication for this regimen was one or more risk factors for TRM including age > 50 years, extensive prior therapy, and/or significant co-morbidities. The hematopoietic cell transplant co-morbidity index (HCT-CI) score of Sorror was retrospectively assigned. Results: The median age was 56 years (range 18–69). All but one patient had high-risk disease. Twenty-one had AML (16 CR1, 5 CR2) with all CR1 patients having high-risk features, including high-risk cytogenetics (n = 3), FLT-3 ITD mutation (n = 5), therapy-related disease or prior MDS (n = 6), and/or > 3 consecutive induction chemotherapies (n = 2). Five had ALL (4 CR1, 1 CR3); the 4 in CR1 had BCR/ABL mutations (n = 3) or prior refractory CNS disease (n = 1). Four patients had MDS with 3 having an IPSS score > 2. The median HCT-CI score was 2.5 (range 1–5). Median infused TNC doses were 2.6 (larger unit) and 1.9 (smaller unit) × 107/kg, respectively. Ninety-seven percent of patients engrafted (95%CI: 87–100) at a median of 26 days (range 13–43). The median day 21 total donor bone marrow chimerism was 100% (range 71–100). All surviving patients were 100% donor by day 100, and sustained hematopoiesis has been mediated by a single unit in all but one patient. The cumulative incidence of platelet recovery > 20 × 109/L by day 180 was 93% (95%CI: 83–100), and occurred at a median of 46 days (range 30–79). Day 180 TRM and 2-year relapse incidences were 20% and 11%, respectively. With a median 26.5 months (range 9–53) follow-up of survivors, the 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) are both 60% (95%CI: 44–82). There was a hierarchy in 2-year DFS according to the Sorror HCT-CI score (Figure): the 11 patients (median age 55 years) with a score of 1 had a DFS of 82%. This compared with a 2-year DFS of 62% in the 9 patients (median age 51 years) with a score of 2–3, and 40% in the 11 patients (median age 58 years) with a score of 4–5 (p = 0.13). Discussion: This reduced intensity regimen combined with double-unit CBT reliably facilitates sustained donor engraftment without ATG. This regimen is associated with less toxicity than high-dose myeloablative conditioning. While other approaches are needed in patients with high comorbidity scores, this regimen is highly effective in older patients who are otherwise reasonably fit, as evidenced by the 82% 2-year DFS in patients with a median age of 55 years. Given the relatively low risk of relapse, it also represents a promising alternative to high-dose conditioning in younger patients. Disclosures: Giralt: Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Myeloablative Fractionated Busulfan with Fludarabine in Older Patients: Long Term Outcomes of Prospective Phase II Clinical Trial

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139325 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 10-11

Author(s):

Rohtesh S. Mehta ◽

Roland Bassett ◽

Julianne Chen ◽

Benigno C. Valdez ◽

Jitesh Kawedia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Long Term Outcomes ◽

Research Support ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Gvhd Prophylaxis

Background: We started a randomized phase II trial [NCT01572662] that compared the safety of two myeloablative fractionated ("timed-sequential") busulfan with fludarabine (Bu-Flu) conditioning regimens: one with a lower dose of busulfan (area under the curve [AUC] of 16 000 μmol.min; 16K arm) and one with a higher dose (AUC of 20 000 μmol.min; 20K arm). After 49 patients were treated on the 16K group and 48 patients on the 20K group, the randomization was stopped as the higher dose arm was found to be as safe as the lower dose arm. The outcomes of those patients were previously reported, with the primary endpoint of interest being day 100 non-relapse mortality (NRM). The trial then continued enrolment as a single-arm study with increased accrual onto the higher dose arm. The current paper reports long-term outcomes of a total of 150 patients treated on the higher dose arm with an extended median follow-up of over 3.5 years. Methods: Patients with hematological malignancies up to 75 years of age were included. Bu dosing was determined on the basis of pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses conducted after day -13 and day -6 dose to achieve target AUC 20 000 ± 12% μmol.min (20K arm). On days −13 and −12, patients received 80 mg/m2 Bu IV daily as outpatient. Then, Flu 40 mg/m2 and Bu IV once daily were given as inpatient from day −6 though −3. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus from day −2 and methotrexate on days 1, 3, 6, and 11. Results: The median age was 61 years (interquartile range, 55-67); most were males (91; 61%) had an unrelated donor (n=93, 62%) and received peripheral blood graft (n=110, 73.3%). The most common diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 88, 58.7%). Among AML, 41% (n=24) were in CR, 44% (n=26) had primary induction failure and 15% (n=9) had relapsed disease without attaining CR before HCT. Over half had HCT-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) >3 (n=79, 52.7%). Estimated relapse, NRM, and overall survival (OS) were 40% (95% confidence interval (CI), 32.1%-47.9%), 22% (95% CI, 15.3%-28.7%), and 49.1% (95% CI, 41.7%-57.8%) at 3 years [Table]. The highest relapse rate at 3 years was noted in patients with myeloma (70.6%), followed by MDS (51.7%), and lymphoma (46.2%), while it was the lowest in myelofibrosis (13.6%). Among AML patients not in CR, the rate of relapse was not higher than those who were in CR (37.1% and 41.7%, respectively at 3 years). NRM at 3 years ranged from 7.7% (lymphoma) to 37.1% (AML, not in CR). Lymphoma patients had the lowest NRM (7.7%) and the best OS (69.2%) at 3 years, while AML patients not in CR had the highest NRM (37.1%) and the lowest OS (31.4%) [Figure]. Patients with HCT-CI 0-2 had lower NRM (14.1%; 95% CI, 5.9%-22.3%) and better OS (57.2%; 95% CI, 46.7%-70.1%) than those with HCT-CI > 3 (NRM: 29.1%; 95% CI, 19%-39.2% & OS: 41.7%; 95% CI, 32.2%-54.2%). Day 100 cumulative incidence of grade II-V acute GVHD was 38% (95% CI, 30.2%-45.8%), grade III-IV was 11.3% (95% CI, 6.2%- 16.4%). At 3 years, cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GVHD was 27% (95% CI, 20%-34%), bronchiolitis obliterans was 4.7% (95% CI, 1.3%-8.1%), and secondary malignancies was 8.7% (95% CI, 4.1%-13.2%). Conclusion: The fractionated myeloablative Bu-Flu conditioning regimen is well tolerated and leads to acceptable risk of NRM, relapse and long term survival in older patients, those with high risk disease and high comorbidities. Acknowledging the high risk study population, the long term outcomes, although acceptable, provide a framework to further improve upon. Modifications of this fractionated Bu-Flu regimen to further enhance its efficacy (with the addition of other chemotherapy agents) while reducing the toxicity and risk of NRM (with an inclusion of novel GVHD prophylaxis regimens) are currently being investigated. Disclosures Mehta: Incyte: Research Funding; Kadmon: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding. Alousi:Therakos: Research Funding; Alexion: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding. Bashir:Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; KITE: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue: Other: Advisory Board; Takeda: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; StemLine: Research Funding. Hosing:NKARTA Inc.: Consultancy. Kebriaei:Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Jazz: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board. Oran:Celgene: Consultancy; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; ASTEX: Research Funding. Qazilbash:Angiocrine: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Bioline: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Shpall:Takeda: Other: Licensing Agreement; Magenta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptimmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Zelluna: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Champlin:Takeda: Patents & Royalties; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy; Actinium: Consultancy; Cytonus: Consultancy; Omeros: Consultancy; Genzyme: Speakers Bureau; DKMS America: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Popat:Bayer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-125449 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 2609-2609

Author(s):

Muhned Alhumaid ◽

Georgina S Daher-Reyes ◽

Wilson Lam ◽

Arjun Law ◽

Tracy Murphy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Older Patients ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Research Funding ◽

Age Groups ◽

Treatment Strategies ◽

Patient Characteristics ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Disease Behavior

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in adolescents and young adults (AYA) are rarely reported as an isolated subgroup. Treatments vary little across age groups, and treatment intensity depends upon comorbid conditions and performance status. Optimal treatment strategies focused on disease behavior, biological factors, and the distinct needs of this subset of AML patients remain elusive. The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine the characteristics and outcomes of AYA AML patients treated at a specialized adult leukemia cancer center in comparison to older adults with AML (40-60 years). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients treated at Princess Margaret Cancer Center from 2008-2018. Patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. Clinical characteristics, treatment strategies, and survival outcomes were recorded for all patients. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method and the impact of covariates were assessed using the Log-rank test. Finally, we compared the outcomes of AYA patients treated at our centre between 2015-2018 with older patients. Results: A total of 175 patients aged 18-39 were identified. Patient characteristics are shown in (Table 1). Cytogenetic were available in 163 patients. Based on MRC criteria, 27 (16%) were favorable risk, intermediate in 95 (54%), adverse in 39 (22%), and missing/failed in 14(8%). NPM1 status was available in 110 patients of whom 38 (35%) were positive. FLT3-ITD was available in 67 patients with 24 (36%) positive. Both mutations were present in 13 (54%) patients. There were no significant differences in terms of risk stratification based on cytogenetic and molecular markers based on age (18-29 vs.30-39) (P= 0.98). Most patients 172 (98%) received induction, 157 (91%) with 3+7, and 15 (9%) with FLAG-IDA. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 133 (77%) after first induction [120 (76%) after 3+7 and 11 (73%) after FLAG-IDA]. Induction related mortality was low (2%). Of the 39 who did not achieve CR, thirty-four patients received re-induction (13 FLAG-IDA, 16 NOVE-HiDAC, 5 others) with CR in 21 (62%). Overall, 154 (89.5%) achieved CR1. Sixty-four (42%) proceeded to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in CR1. 59 (38%) patients relapsed in CR1 with 8 (12%) relapsing post HSCT. Fifty-five (5 post HSCT) patients received reinduction with 30 (51%) (2 after HSCT) achieving CR2. Fifteen patients received HSCT in CR2. OS and DFS at 2 years were 62% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and 50% (95% CI 0.41-0.57), respectively. Stratified by cytogenetic risk, OS was 81% for favorable risk, 61% for intermediate, and 50% for adverse risk (P=0.0001), respectively. DFS in these groups was 85%, 57%, and 46 % (P=0.0025), respectively. We further compared outcomes in the 18-29y and 30-39y age groups. The OS was 61.9% compared to 62.5% (P=0.91) and DFS of 52.1% compared to 47% (P=0.65) respectively. On univariate analysis for OS and DFS, cytogenetic risk stratification was the only significant variable (P=0.0004 and P=0.0042). We then compared the outcomes 67 sequential patients aged I8-39 treated from 2014-2018, with those of 176 sequential patients aged 40-60 treated during the same period (table 2). OS at 2 years was not statistically higher in the younger group compared to the older group (66.7% vs. 61.2%, P=0.372). While relapse rate was lower in older patients (15.5% vs. 22.6%, P=0.093), NRM was higher in older patients (29.7% vs. 18.8%,P=0.094). Conclusion: AYA pts. occupy a unique niche amongst AML as a whole. While treatment responses have improved in general, there may be potential for further gains in these patients. Increased tolerance for more intense treatment strategies as well as the incorporation of novel agents into standard treatment protocols may provide a means to optimize care in AYA patients. Finally, research is needed to elucidate biological mechanisms and predictors of disease behavior instead of arbitrary, age-stratified treatment schema. Disclosures McNamara: Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc.: Consultancy. Schimmer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Medivir Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schuh:Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva Canada Innovation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Maze:Pfizer Inc: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Yee:Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; MedImmune: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Hoffman La Roche: Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Gupta:Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Multicenter Analysis of Treatment and Outcomes for Patient with TP53 Mutated AML in the Era of Novel Therapies; Significant Impact of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation on Survival

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2021-147639 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 797-797

Author(s):

Talha Badar ◽

Mark R. Litzow ◽

Rory M. Shallis ◽

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf ◽

Antoine Saliba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cell ◽

High Risk ◽

Stem Cell Transplantation ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Univariate Analysis ◽

Advisory Board ◽

Novel Therapies ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Tp53 Mutations

Abstract Background: TP53 mutations occur in 10-20% of patients with AML, constitute high-risk disease as per ELN criteria, and confer poorer prognosis. Venetoclax combination therapies and CPX-351 were recently approved for AML treatment and lead to improved outcomes in subsets of high-risk AML, however the most effective approach for treatment of TP53-mutated (m) AML remains unclear. In this study we explored the clinical outcome of TP53m AML patients treated over the last 8 years as novel therapies have been introduced to our therapeutic armamentarium. Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational study in collaboration with 4 U.S. academic centers and analyzed clinical characteristics and outcome of 174 TP53m AML patients diagnosed between March 2013 and February 2021. Mutation analysis was performed on bone marrow specimens using 42, 49, 199, or 400 gene targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) panels. Patients with an initial diagnosis of AML were divided into 4 groups (GP) based on the progressive use of novel therapies in clinical trials and their approvals as AML induction therapy during different time periods: 2013-2017 (GP1, n= 37), 2018-2019 (GP2, n= 53), 2019-2020 (GP3, n= 48) and 2020-2021 (GP4, n= 36) to analyze difference in outcome. Results: Baseline characteristics were not significantly different across different GP, as shown in Table 1. Median age of patients was 68 (range [R], 18-83), 65 (R, 29-88), 69 (R, 37-90) and 70 (R, 51-97) years in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.40). The percentage of patients with de novo AML/secondary AML/therapy-related AML in GP1-4 was 40/40/20, 36/29/24, 37.5/37.5/25 and 28/52/20, respectively (p=0.82). The proportion of patients with complex cytogenetics (CG) was 92%, 89%, 96% and 94% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.54). The median TP53m variant allele frequency (VAF) was 48% (range [R], 5-94), 42% (R, 5-91), 45% (R, 10-94) and 60% (R, 8-82) in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.38). Four (11%), 13 (24.5%), 10 (21%) and 9 (25%) patients had multiple TP53 mutations in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.33). The proportion of patients who received 3+7 (30%, 16%, 6% & 8%; p=0.01), HMA only (11%, 18%, 2% & 8%; p=0.06), venetoclax-based (2.5%, 12%, 48%, & 61%; p <0.01) and CPX-351 induction (16%, 40%, 28% & 5%; p<0.001) were varied in GP1-4, respectively. The rate of CR/CRi was 22%, 26%, 28% and 18% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.63). Treatment related mortality during induction was observed in 3%, 7%, 10% and 17% of patients in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.18). Overall, 28 (16%) patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) after induction/consolidation: 22%, 15%, 17% and 11% in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.67). In subset analysis, there was no difference in the rate of CR/CRi with venetoclax-based regimens vs. others (39% vs 61%, p=0.18) or with CPX-351 vs. others (25% vs 75%, p=0.84). The median progression-free survival was 7.7, 7.0, 5.1 and 6.6 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.60, Fig 1A). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.4, 6.1, 4.0 and 8.0 months in GP1-4, respectively (p=0.29, Fig 1B). In univariate analysis for OS, achievement of CR/CRi (p<0.001) and alloHCT in CR1 (p<0.001) associated with favorable outcome, whereas complex CG (p=0.01) and primary refractory disease (p<0.001) associated with poor outcome. Multiple TP53 mutations (p=0.73), concurrent ASXL1m (p=0.86), extra-medullary disease (p=0.92), ≥ 3 non-TP53m mutations (p=0.72), TP53m VAF ≥ 40% vs. < 40% (p=0.25), induction with CPX-351 vs. others (p=0.59) or venetoclax-based regimen vs. others (p=0.14) did not show significance for favorable or poor OS in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, alloHCT in CR1 (hazard ratio [HR]=0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.53; p=0.001) retained an association with favorable OS and complex CG (HR 4.23, 95%CI: 1.79-10.0; p=0.001) retained an association with dismal OS. Conclusion: We present the largest experience with TP53m AML patients analyzed by NGS. Although outcomes were almost universally dismal, alloHCT appears to improve the long-term survival in a subset of these patients. Effective therapies are warranted to successfully bridge patients to alloHCT and to prolong survival for transplant ineligible patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Badar: Pfizer Hematology-Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Litzow: Omeros: Other: Advisory Board; Pluristem: Research Funding; Actinium: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Jazz: Other: Advisory Board; AbbVie: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biosight: Other: Data monitoring committee. Shallis: Curis: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Goldberg: Celularity: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; DAVA Oncology: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Research Funding; Prelude Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aptose: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Atallah: BMS: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Foran: revolution medicine: Honoraria; gamida: Honoraria; bms: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Research Funding; kura: Research Funding; h3bioscience: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; servier: Honoraria; aptose: Research Funding; actinium: Research Funding; abbvie: Research Funding; trillium: Research Funding; sanofi aventis: Honoraria; certara: Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; taiho: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; aprea: Research Funding; sellas: Research Funding; stemline: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Second Imatinib Discontinuation Outcomes in Patients Regaining Durable Deep Molecular Response in the Korean Imatinib Discontinuation Study; KID Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-139253 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 51-52

Author(s):

Sung-Eun Lee ◽

Joon Seong Park ◽

Young Rok Do ◽

Sung-Hyun Kim ◽

Dae Young Zang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Prospective Study ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Median Duration ◽

Research Funding ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Molecular Response ◽

Close Monitoring ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Deep Molecular Response ◽

Multicenter Prospective Study

Backgroud: Although multiple trials have shown that stopping tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment can be employed in CP CML patients with sustained deep molecular response (DMR) after enough TKI therapy, they emphasized the need for close monitoring because about 50-70% of patients experienced molecular relapse. However, most patients with molecular recurrence regain their initial molecular level after restarting TKI therapy. Aims: In this study, we analyzed second imatinib (IM) discontinuation outcomes in patients regaining durable DMR in the Korean multicenter prospective study (Korean Imatinib Discontinuation Study; KID Study) Methods: CP CML patients who were treated with IM for more than 3 years and maintained DMR for at least 2 years were eligible for the Korean multicenter prospective study and in cases of MMR loss on 2 consecutive assessments, IM treatment was re-introduced. After IM resumption, the molecular response was evaluated every month until re-achievement of MMR and every 3 months thereafter. The second stop was permitted in the patients who were in second DMR for at least 2 years. Results: Among the patients who maintained a second DMR for at least 2 years after IM resumption, 23 patients entered into a second IM stop. Prior to first discontinuation, the median duration of IM therapy was 73.2 months (range, 38.4-133.2 months) and the duration of sustained UMRD was 38.4 months (range, 24-102 months). After first attempt of IM discontinuation, they relapsed after a median duration of 3.7 months (range, 1.8-20.8 months) and re-achieved UMRD at a median of 5.8 months (range, 1.7-12.1 months) after IM resumption. After sustaining a second DMR for a median of 26.3 months, IM therapy discontinued for a second time. With a median follow-up of 29.5 months (range, 9-63 months) since second IM stop, 15/23 patients (65%) lost MMR after a median 2.9 months (range, 1.8-30.7 months), which was similar to those of the first IM discontinuation [median 3.7 (range, 1.8-20.8 months)]. The patients who lost MMR were retreated with IM for a median of 24.5 months (range, 1.2-49.7 months); 14 patients re-achieved MMR and one patient was in therapy for 1.2 months. Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that a second attempt might be possible and the median time to MMR loss after second discontinuation was similar to those of the first discontinuation. Further studies on the predictors to select patients for a trial of second TFR and novel strategies will be warranted. Disclosures Kim: Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ILYANG: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sun Pharma.: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Predictors and Outcomes of Flares in Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2020-136479 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 47-48

Author(s):

Grigori Okoev ◽

Daniel J. Weisdorf ◽

John E Wagner ◽

Bruce R. Blazar ◽

Margaret L. MacMillan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Regression Analysis ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Graft Versus Host Disease ◽

Research Funding ◽

Time Dependent ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Day Range ◽

Similar Risk ◽

Fund Research

Introduction: Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (cGvHD) frequently requires prolonged immune suppressive therapy (IST) with > 50% still on IST at 5 years. The IST typically involves a slow taper of steroids often with flare of cGvHD, necessitating augmentation of previous therapy or addition of new IST. Studies describing cGvHD flares are limited. We analyzed patients with cGvHD who flared during the treatment with systemic IST, their overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Methods: This study included all adult patients with cGvHD (n=145) following an allogeneic transplant (2010 - 2017) from a matched sibling donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant (MSD, n=104 (72%) or double/single umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT, n=41 (28%). The 2014 NIH Consensus Criteria were used to classify organ/overall cGvHD severity. Flare of cGvHD was defined as progression in cGvHD manifestations (after initial response), which was less severe than at diagnosis. Multivariate regression of flares was based on the Prentice, Williams and Peterson model for ordered multiple events (flares). Time-dependent effects on OS and NRM were analyzed by Cox and Fine and Gray regression with propensity scoring to control for confounding. Results: Flares occurred in 87 patients; the cumulative incidence of flares was 60% (95% CI: 51-70%) at a median of 188 days (range 16-751) after diagnosis of cGvHD. The median dose of prednisone was 1 mg/kg/day (range 0-4.2) at diagnosis of cGvHD. At the diagnosis of flare, 36 (41%) of the patients were off prednisone, 50 (57%) were receiving 0.1-0.5 mg/kg /day, and 2 patients > 0.5 mg/kg /day. Thirty two of the 87 (36%) patients experienced multiple flares (2 to 4). The most common organs involved at cGvHD flare were skin (n=45; 51%), mouth (n=27; 31%), GI tract (n=22; 25%) and liver (n=12; 14%); often in combinations of skin/mouth in 11 cases (13%), skin/GI in 6 (7%) and liver/mouth in 4 (5%) cases. Treatment for flare was mostly increase in dose of prednisone to 0.5 mg/kg/day (range 0.3-1.0) in 77 patients (88%) plus the addition of another line of IST in 48 patients (55%). In multiple regression analysis, only donor type was significant predictor of flare in cGvHD. UCBT was associated with 2-fold lower probability of flaring (HR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.9; p=0.03) compared to MSD. cGvHD severity, organ involvement, platelet count at diagnosis and type of onset were not significant predictors of cGvHD flares. At 2 years after the initial flare, the OS was 77% (95% CI: 66-84%) and NRM 19% (95% CI: 11-28%). Multiple regression analysis evaluating OS and NRM from onset of cGvHD comparing flare to non-flare were performed using flare as a time dependent variable. Compared to cGvHD patients without flare at 2 years, those with flare of cGvHD had a similar risk of NRM (HR 1.2; 95% CI: 0.2-6.1, p=0.86) and OS (HR 0.9; 95% CI: 0.4-2.3, p=0.85). At 2 years from cGvHD onset, the cumulative incidence of resolved cGvHD (durable discontinuation of steroids for ≥ 6 consecutive months) was 31% (95% CI: 21-41%) in those who flared vs. 86% (95% CI: 75-96%) in those without flare. Conclusions: Though cGvHD patients with flare had similar risk of NRM and OS as those without a flare, patients with flare required extended steroids, along with clinical monitoring and intensified IST. cGvHD after UCBT was associated with significantly lower risk of flaring compared to MSD. The ongoing burden of IST, risk of infection and morbidity of cGvHD is substantial and needs better approaches than chronic slow taper of steroids. Disclosures Weisdorf: Incyte: Research Funding; FATE Therapeutics: Consultancy. Wagner:Novartis: Research Funding; Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; BlueRock: Research Funding; Gadeta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blazar:Fate Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; BlueRock Therapeutics: Research Funding; BlueRock Therapeuetic: Consultancy; Magenta Therapeutics: Consultancy; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-founder. MacMillan:Mesoblast: Consultancy; Angiocrine Biosciences, Inc.: Consultancy; Equillium, Inc.: Consultancy; Talaris Therapeutics, Inc: Consultancy; Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Holtan:Generon: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Other: Clinical trial data adjudication; Incyte: Consultancy. Brunstein:AlloVir: Other: Advisory board; Gamida: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Magenta: Research Funding. Betts:Patent Pending: Patents & Royalties: Dr. Betts has a pending patent WO2017058950A1: Methods of treating transplant rejection. This includes the use of JAK inhibitors. Neither he nor his institution have received payment related to claims described in the patent.. Bachanova:FATE: Research Funding; Karyopharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding. Rashidi:Synthetic Biologics: Other: DSMC member (1 trial) and related honorarium. Arora:Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kadmon: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia Outcomes Remain Dismal Despite Novel Agents and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-127049 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 266-266

Author(s):

Sagar Patel ◽

Saulius K. Girnius ◽

Binod Dhakal ◽

Lohith Gowda ◽

Raphael Fraser ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Plasma Cell ◽

Research Funding ◽

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽

Disease Status ◽

Cell Leukemia ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia ◽

Equity Ownership

Background Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare plasma cell neoplasm with a high mortality rate. There have been improvements in multiple myeloma (MM) outcomes with novel induction agents and use of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with maintenance, but similar progress has not been reported for pPCL. We examined the outcomes of pPCL patients receiving novel agents with autologous (autoHCT) or allogeneic (alloHCT) approaches as reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) in the modern era. Methods From 2008 to 2015, 348 pPCL pts underwent HCT (N = 277 - autoHCT and 71 - alloHCT) with 45% and 48% having research level data available, respectively. Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and relapse/progression (REL), and probability of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Cox multivariate regression was used to model survival after autoHCT only. Median follow-up in autoHCT and alloHCT was 48 and 60 months, respectively. Results AutoHCT Cohort Median age was 60 years and 93% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis with 76% after a single line of induction (Table 1). 35% had high risk cytogenetics. 23% received bortezomib, doxorubicin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (VDPACE). Moreover, 40% received bortezomib (BTZ) and immunomodulatory drug (IMIID)-based triplets. Disease status at HCT was VGPR or better in 47%. 27% received maintenance therapy. At 4 years post-HCT, NRM was 7% (4-11%), REL 76% (69-82%), PFS 17% (13-23%), and OS 28% (22-35%) (Figures 1A, 2A, 2B). Disease status ≥VGPR at HCT and Karnofsky Performance Score >90 significantly predicted superior OS in multivariate analysis. AlloHCT Cohort Median age was 53 years and 89% received HCT within 12 months of diagnosis (Table 1). 61% received a single alloHCT, while 39% used auto-alloHCT tandem approach. 42% had high-risk cytogenetics. 61% received total body irradiation with 44% receiving myeloablative conditioning. Use of VDPACE was higher at 41% in this cohort. VGPR status at HCT was similar (48%), while maintenance was used less often (12%). Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 30% and chronic GVHD in 45%. At four years post-HCT, NRM was 12% (5-21%), REL 69% (56-81%), PFS 19% (10-31%), and OS 31% (19-44%) (Figures 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B). There were no differences in outcomes based on type of HCT. A comparison of post-HCT outcomes of CIBMTR pPCL patients from 1995 to 2006 showed that PFS and OS outcomes are inferior despite lower NRM in this modern cohort (Mahindra et al. Leukemia. 2012). In addition, analysis of SEER (1995-2009) and CIBMTR databases showed that use of HCT increased from 12% (7-21%) in 1995 to 46% (34-64%) in 2009. Conclusion More newly diagnosed pPCL patients are receiving modern induction regimens translating into a higher proportion receiving HCT, but without significant further benefit post-HCT. Post-HCT relapse remains the biggest challenge and further survival in pPCL will likely need a combination of targeted and cell therapy approaches. This study provides a benchmark for future HCT studies for pPCL. Disclosures Girnius: Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Dhakal:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Shah:University of California, San Francisco: Employment; Indapta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Oncopeptides, Karoypharm, Surface Oncology, Precision biosciences GSK, Nektar, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nkarta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teneobio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Qazilbash:Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Bioclinical: Consultancy; Autolus: Consultancy; Genzyme: Other: Speaker. Kumar:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. D'Souza:EDO-Mundapharma, Merck, Prothena, Sanofi, TeneoBio: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Pfizer, Imbrium, Akcea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hari:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cell Vault: Equity Ownership; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Conventional Immunochemotherapy (R-CHOEP) Vs High-Dose Immunochemotherapy (R-MegaCHOEP) in Younger Patients with High-Risk Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma: 10-Year Long-Term Follow-up of a German Lymphoma Alliance (GLA) Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123637 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 1589-1589

Author(s):

Fabian Frontzek ◽

Marita Ziepert ◽

Maike Nickelsen ◽

Bettina Altmann ◽

Bertram Glass ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Risk ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Board ◽

High Dose ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Scientific Advisory Board ◽

Scientific Advisory

Introduction: The R-MegaCHOEP trial showed that dose-escalation of conventional chemotherapy necessitating autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) does not confer a survival benefit for younger patients (pts) with high-risk aggressive B-cell lymphoma in the Rituximab era (Schmitz et al., Lancet Oncology 2012; 13, 1250-1259). To describe efficacy and toxicity over time and document the long-term risks of relapse and secondary malignancy we present the 10-year follow-up of this study. Methods: In the randomized, prospective phase 3 trial R-MegaCHOEP younger pts aged 18-60 years with newly diagnosed, high-risk (aaIPI 2-3) aggressive B-cell lymphoma were assigned to 8 cycles of CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubcine, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone) or 4 cycles of dose-escalated high-dose therapy (HDT) necessitating repetitive ASCT both combined with Rituximab. Both arms were stratified according to aaIPI, bulky disease, and center. Primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). All analyses were calculated for the intention-to-treat population. This follow-up report includes molecular data based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for MYC (IHC: 31/92 positive [40-100%], FISH: 14/103 positive), BCL2 (IHC: 65/89 positive [50-100%], FISH: 23/111 positive) and BCL6 (IHC: 52/86 positive [30-100%], FISH: 34/110 positive) and data on cell of origin (COO) classification according to the Lymph2CX assay (GCB: 53/88; ABC: 24/88; unclassified: 11/88). Results: 130 pts had been assigned to R-CHOEP and 132 to R-MegaCHOEP. DLBCL was the most common lymphoma subtype (~80%). 73% of pts scored an aaIPI of 2 and 27% an aaIPI of 3. 60% of pts had an initial lymphoma bulk and in 40% more than 1 extranodal site was involved. After a median observation time of 111 months, EFS at 10 years was 57% (95% CI 47-67%) in the R-CHOEP vs. 51% in the R-MegaCHOEP arm (42-61%) (hazard ratio 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8, p=0.228), overall survival (OS) after 10 years was 72% (63-81%) vs. 66% (57-76%) respectively (p=0.249). With regard to molecular characterization, we were unable to detect a significant benefit for HDT/ASCT in any subgroup analyzed. In total, 16% of pts (30 pts) relapsed after having achieved a complete remission (CR). 23% of all relapses (7 pts) showed an indolent histology (follicular lymphoma grade 1-3a) and 6 of these pts survived long-term. In contrast, of 23 pts (77%) relapsing with aggressive DLBCL or unknown histology 18 pts died due to lymphoma or related therapy. The majority of relapses occurred during the first 3 years after randomization (median time: 22 months) while after 5 years we detected relapses only in 5 pts (3% of all 190 pts prior CR). 11% of pts were initially progressive (28 pts) among whom 71% (20 pts) died rapidly due to lymphoma. Interestingly, the remaining 29% (8 pts) showed a long-term survival after salvage therapy (+/- ASCT); only 1 pt received allogeneic transplantation. The frequency of secondary malignancies was very similar in both treatment arms (9% vs. 8%) despite the very high dose of etoposide (total 4g/m2)in the R-MegaCHOEP arm. We observed 2 cases of AML and 1 case of MDS per arm. In total 70 pts (28%) have died: 30 pts due to lymphoma (12%), 22 pts therapy-related (11 pts due to salvage therapy) (9%), 8 pts of secondary neoplasia (3%), 5 pts due to concomitant disease (2%) and 5 pts for unknown reasons. Conclusions: This 10-year long-term follow-up of the R-MegaCHOEP trial confirms the very encouraging outcome of young high-risk pts following conventional chemotherapy with R-CHOEP. High-dose therapy did not improve outcome in any subgroup analysis including molecular high-risk groups. Relapse rate was generally low. Pts with aggressive relapse showed a very poor long-term outcome while pts with indolent histology at relapse survived long-term. Secondary malignancies occurred; however, they were rare with no excess leukemias/MDS following treatment with very high doses of etoposide and other cytotoxic agents. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe. Figure Disclosures Nickelsen: Roche Pharma AG: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grants; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Grant; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hänel:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Other: advisory board; Roche: Honoraria. Truemper:Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Held:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acrotech: Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Other: Travel support, Research Funding. Dreyling:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Other: scientific advisory board; Sandoz: Other: scientific advisory board; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: scientific advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Acerta: Other: scientific advisory board. Viardot:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosenwald:MorphoSys: Consultancy. Lenz:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Employment, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy. Schmitz:Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Equity Ownership; Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Download Full-text

Reduced Intensity Conditioned Sibling Transplantation Versus No Transplant in Intermediate or High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Prospective Multi-Center Study in Patients 50-70 Years in First Complete Remission and with at Least One Potential Sibling Donor (ClinTrialGov 00342316)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2018-99-110260 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽

pp. 205-205

Author(s):

Mats Brune ◽

Thomas L. Kiss ◽

Elisabeth Wallhult ◽

Harald Anderson ◽

Robert Delage ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Study Groups ◽

Hla Typing ◽

Control Groups ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Sibling Donor ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

And Control ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Background and study design. Reduced intensity conditioning transplantation (RICT) is a commonly applied treatment option for AML patients >50 years of age. Prospective, controlled studies comparing RICT with standard chemotherapy are warranted. In this study, we aimed to prevent selection biases. Thus, patients were included prior to HLA typing of potential sibling donors, and statistical analyses were based on an intention-to-transplant, donor versus no-donor approach. Hence, the analyses also include events occurring during the donor search period and also the transplantation procedures along with post-transplant events. Patients and procedures. Between 2003 and 2016, 163 patients with AML in CR1 were included in Canada (n=69), Sweden (n=63), and Germany/Finland/Norway/New Zealand (n=31). Eighteen patients were excluded due to enrolment after the start of donor typing (n=14), lack of data (n=1), low-risk AML (n=2) or withdrawn consent (n=1). Thus, results from 145 patients with high (n=48) or intermediate (n=97) risk disease were available for analysis. Included patients were a median of 63 (50-70) years old, deemed fit for RICT and had at least one willing and healthy but not yet HLA typed sibling. The ensuing HLA typings thus yielded one RICT group including patients with ≥1 confirmed matched sibling donor (MSD), and one control group with no MSD. Date of inclusion was defined as date of HLA typing of the first potential MSD. The protocol-specified conditioning regimen for RICT was fludarabine (150-180 mg/m2) and busulfan (8 mg/kg orally or 6.4 mg/kg i.v., used in 95% of patients). Immunosuppression was ciclosporin alone (9%), with methotrexate (53%) or with MMF (35%). Peripheral blood stem cells were used in 95% of transplantations. Control patients received consolidation chemotherapy as per local routines. Statistics. Baseline factors were compared between study groups using Fisher´s exact test and rank sum tests. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with secondary endpoints of relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate OS and RFS and cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate NRM and RI considering competing risks. The logrank test was employed for group comparisons of event rates with time censored at 5 yrs post inclusion. Results. The median follow-up time of surviving patients was 7.9 (0.24-14) yrs. Age, AML risk group and time from CR to inclusion did not differ between the study groups. Time lag from diagnosis to study inclusion was 65 (32-256) days (Controls) and 64 (29-319) days (RICT), P=0.74, Mann-Whitney test. Time from CR1 to inclusion was 22 (0-218) days (Controls) and 19 (0-131) (RICT). Excluding conditioning, patients in the RICT group received fewer chemotherapy cycles than controls. The time from start of last chemotherapy to transplant was median 63 (36-212) days. The incidence of acute (grade 2-4) and chronic extensive GvHD in transplanted patients was 25% and 39%, respectively. The non-relapse mortality at 3 years post inclusion (Table) was 12% (RICT group) and 4% (Controls). Causes of death was primarily AML, accounting for 73% and 88% of all deaths in the RICT and control groups, respectively. Twenty pts with an identified donor did not reach RICT due to relapse (n=12), co-morbidities (n=5), death (n=2), other (n=1). Total mortality at time of analysis was slightly lower in the RICT group (66% vs 75%). Overall survival (primary endpoint) at 3 years was 45% (CI 33-56) and 48% (36-60), in RICT and control groups, respectively. At 10 years after inclusion, OS in study groups were similar; RICT 27% (CI 15-41), Control 25% (CI 15-36). There were no significant differences between study groups with respect to primary or secondary endpoints (OS: P=0.27, RFS:P=0.98, RI: P=0.50, NRM: P=0.10, logrank tests. Figure). Conclusions. Applying an intention-to-treat analysis we did not demonstrate clinical benefit of sibling donor search and stem cell transplantation after a reduced intensity busulfan/fludarabine based regimen in AML patients ≥50 years in CR1. Early relapse was the main reason for preventing transplants in patients with an identified donor. Support from study groups: Canadian BMT Group, Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group, Norwegian/Swedish BMT Group, Swedish AML group Disclosures Kiss: Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Otsuka: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wallhult:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Daichii-Sankyo: Speakers Bureau. Finke:Riemser: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Neovii: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding; Medac: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel grants, Research Funding. Sabloff:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Human CD83 Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell for the Prevention of Graft Versus Host Disease and Treatment of Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-124031 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 196-196

Author(s):

Bishwas Shrestha ◽

Kelly Walton ◽

Jordan Reff ◽

Elizabeth M. Sagatys ◽

Nhan Tu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

T Cells ◽

T Cell ◽

Board Of Directors ◽

Research Funding ◽

Advisory Committees ◽

Graft Versus Host ◽

Car T Cells ◽

Car T Cell ◽

Car T ◽

Fund Research

Distinct from pharmacologic immunosuppression, we designed a programmed cytolytic effector T cell that prevents graft versus host disease (GVHD). CD83 is expressed on allo-activated conventional T cells (Tconv) and pro-inflammatory dendritic cells (DCs), which are implicated in GVHD pathogenesis. Therefore we developed a novel human CD83 targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell for GVHD prophylaxis. Here we demonstrate that human CD83 CAR T cells eradicate cell mediators of GVHD, significantly increase the ratio of regulatory T cells (Treg) to allo-activated Tconv, and provide lasting protection from xenogeneic GVHD. Further, we show human, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) expresses CD83 and can be targeted by CD83 CAR T cells. A 2nd generation CD83 CAR was generated with CD3ζ and 41BB costimulatory domain that was retrovirally transduced in human T cells to generate CD83 CAR T cells. The CD83 CAR construct exhibited a high degree of transduction efficiency of about 60%. The CD83 CAR T cells demonstrated robust IFN-γ and IL-2 production, killing, and proliferation when cultured with CD83+ target cells. To test whether human CD83 CAR T cells reduce alloreactivity in vitro, we investigated their suppressive function in allogeneic mixed leukocyte reactions (alloMLR). CD83 CAR T cells were added to 5-day alloMLRs consisting of autologous T cells and allogeneic monocyte-derived DCs at ratios ranging from 3:1 to 1:10. The CD83 CAR T cells potently reduced alloreactive T cell proliferation compared to mock transduced and CD19 CAR T cells. We identified that CD83 is differentially expressed on alloreactive Tconv, compared to Tregs. Moreover, the CD83 CAR T cell efficiently depletes CD83+ Tconv and proinflammatory DCs with 48 hours of engagement. To test the efficacy of human CD83 CAR T cells in vivo, we used an established xenogeneic GVHD model, where mice were inoculated with human PBMCs (25x106) and autologous CD83 CAR (1-10x106) or mock transduced T cells. The CD83 CAR T cells were well tolerated by the mice, and significantly improved survival compared to mock transduced T cells (Figure 1A). Mice treated with CD83 CAR T cells exhibited negligible GVHD target organ damage at day +21 (Figure 1B). Mice inoculated with CD83 CAR T cells demonstrated significantly fewer CD1c+, CD83+ DCs (1.7x106 v 6.2x105, P=0.002), CD4+, CD83+ T cells (4.8x103 v 5.8x102, P=0.005), and pathogenic Th1 cells (3.1x105 v 1.1x102, P=0.005) at day +21, compared to mice treated with mock transduced T cells. Moreover, the ratio of Treg to alloreactive Tconv (CD25+ non-Treg) was significantly increased among mice treated with CD83 CAR T cells (78 v 346, P=0.02), compared to mice injected with mock transduced T cells. Further, CD83 appears to be a promising candidate to target myeloid malignancies. We observed CD83 expression on malignant myeloid K562, Thp-1, U937, and MOLM-13 cells. Moreover, the CD83 CAR T cells effectively killed AML cell lines. Many AML antigens are expressed on progenitor stem cells. Thus, we evaluated for stem cell killing in human colony forming unit (CFU) assays, which demonstrated negligible on-target, off-tumor toxicity. Therefore, the human CD83 CAR T cell is an innovative cell-based approach to prevent GVHD, while providing direct anti-tumor activity against myeloid malignancies. Figure Disclosures Blazar: Kamon Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Five Prime Therapeutics Inc: Co-Founder, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BlueRock Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie Inc: Research Funding; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research Funding; Childrens' Cancer Research Fund: Research Funding; KidsFirst Fund: Research Funding; Tmunity: Other: Co-Founder; Alpine Immune Sciences, Inc.: Research Funding; RXi Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Magenta Therapeutics and BlueRock Therapeuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Davila:Atara: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Bellicum: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Anixa: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding.

Download Full-text