New Approaches for Mapping Epigenome Dynamics

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. SCI-21-SCI-21
Author(s):  
Steven Henikoff

Abstract The protein complexes that package our genomes must be mobilized for active processes to occur, including replication and transcription, but until recently we have only had a static, low resolution view of the "epigenome". Genomes are packaged into nucleosomes, octamers of four core histones wrapped by 147 base pairs of DNA. Nucleosomes present obstacles to transcription, which over genes is the RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) complex, and one current challenge is to understand what happens to a nucleosome when RNAPII transcribes through the DNA that it occupies. We study this process by developing methods for following nucleosomes as they are evicted and replaced. Among the factors that we have implicated in the process is torsional stress, which we can now measure genome-wide. RNAPII movement can unwrap nucleosomes and thus destabilize them, causing them to be occasionally evicted and replaced. Interestingly, we find that destabilization of nucleosomes during transcription is enhanced by anthracycline compounds, widely used chemotherapeutic drugs that intercalate between DNA base pairs, thus suggesting a new mechanism for cell killing during chemotherapy. We are also interested in what happens to RNAPII during its encounter with a nucleosomes. In vitro, RNAPII cannot transcribe completely through a nucleosome, but rather stalls as it tries to unwrap the DNA from around the core. We have been studying this process in vivo, and have developed a simple method for precisely mapping RNAPII genome-wide. We have used this method to show exactly where RNAPII stalls as it unwraps a nucleosome in vivo, surprisingly in a different place in vivo from where it stalls in vitro. We also have discovered that a variant histone, H2A.Z, which is found in essentially all eukaryotes, helps to reduce the nucleosome barrier to transcription, and in this way may modulate transcription. Other protein components of the epigenome involved in dynamic processes are nucleosome remodelers, which use the energy of ATP to slide or even evict nucleosomes from DNA. Some remodelers help RNAPII get started and others help it overcome the nucleosome barrier to transcription, and by mapping them at base-pair resolution, we can gain insight into how they act. We have also applied our high-resolution mapping tools to transcription factors, which bind DNA at specific sites to regulate transcription and other processes. Our ability to achieve high spatial and temporal resolution mapping of the binding and action of nucleosomes, transcription factors, remodelers and RNAPII provides us with a detailed picture of epigenome dynamics. By using these tools we are beginning to understand how DNA sequence and conformation are recognized for regulation of transcription and other epigenomic processes. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1631-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Chernukhin ◽  
Shaharum Shamsuddin ◽  
Sung Yun Kang ◽  
Rosita Bergström ◽  
Yoo-Wook Kwon ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT CTCF is a transcription factor with highly versatile functions ranging from gene activation and repression to the regulation of insulator function and imprinting. Although many of these functions rely on CTCF-DNA interactions, it is an emerging realization that CTCF-dependent molecular processes involve CTCF interactions with other proteins. In this study, we report the association of a subpopulation of CTCF with the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) protein complex. We identified the largest subunit of Pol II (LS Pol II) as a protein significantly colocalizing with CTCF in the nucleus and specifically interacting with CTCF in vivo and in vitro. The role of CTCF as a link between DNA and LS Pol II has been reinforced by the observation that the association of LS Pol II with CTCF target sites in vivo depends on intact CTCF binding sequences. “Serial” chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis revealed that both CTCF and LS Pol II were present at the β-globin insulator in proliferating HD3 cells but not in differentiated globin synthesizing HD3 cells. Further, a single wild-type CTCF target site (N-Myc-CTCF), but not the mutant site deficient for CTCF binding, was sufficient to activate the transcription from the promoterless reporter gene in stably transfected cells. Finally, a ChIP-on-ChIP hybridization assay using microarrays of a library of CTCF target sites revealed that many intergenic CTCF target sequences interacted with both CTCF and LS Pol II. We discuss the possible implications of our observations with respect to plausible mechanisms of transcriptional regulation via a CTCF-mediated direct link of LS Pol II to the DNA.


2004 ◽  
Vol 279 (50) ◽  
pp. 52183-52190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascale Jackers ◽  
Gabor Szalai ◽  
Omar Moussa ◽  
Dennis K. Watson

Megakaryopoiesis is the process by which hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow differentiate into mature megakaryocytes. The expression of megakaryocytic genes during megakaryopoiesis is controlled by specific transcription factors. Fli-1 and GATA-1 transcription factors are required for development of megakaryocytes and promoter analysis has definedin vitrofunctional binding sites for these factors in several megakaryocytic genes, includingGPIIb,GPIX, andC-MPL. Herein, we utilize chromatin immunoprecipitation to examine the presence of Ets-1, Fli-1, and GATA-1 on these promotersin vivo. Fli-1 and Ets-1 occupy the promoters ofGPIIb,GPIX, andC-MPLgenes in both Meg-01 and CMK11-5 cells. WhereasGPIIbis expressed in both Meg-01 and CMK11-5 cells,GPIXandC-MPLare only expressed in the more differentiated CMK11–5 cells. Thus,in vivooccupancy by an Ets factor is not sufficient to promote transcription of some megakaryocytic genes. GATA-1 and Fli-1 are both expressed in CMK11-5 cells and co-occupy theGPIXandC-MPLpromoters. Transcription of all three megakaryocytic genes is correlated with the presence of acetylated histone H3 and phosphorylated RNA polymerase II on their promoters. We also show that exogenous expression of GATA-1 in Meg-01 cells leads to the expression of endogenous c-mpl and gpIX mRNA. WhereasGPIIb,GPIX, andC-MPLare direct target genes for Fli-1, both Fli-1 and GATA-1 are required for formation of an active transcriptional complex on theC-MPLandGPIXpromotersin vivo. In contrast,GPIIbexpression appears to be independent of GATA-1 in Meg-01 cells.


2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2919-2933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Grondin ◽  
Martin Lefrancois ◽  
Mathieu Tremblay ◽  
Marianne Saint-Denis ◽  
André Haman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Transcription factors can function as DNA-binding-specific activators or as coactivators. c-Jun drives gene expression via binding to AP-1 sequences or as a cofactor for PU.1 in macrophages. c-Jun heterodimers bind AP-1 sequences with higher affinity than homodimers, but how c-Jun works as a coactivator is unknown. Here, we provide in vitro and in vivo evidence that c-Jun homodimers are recruited to the interleukin-1β (IL-1β) promoter in the absence of direct DNA binding via protein-protein interactions with DNA-anchored PU.1 and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ). Unexpectedly, the interaction interface with PU.1 and C/EBPβ involves four of the residues within the basic domain of c-Jun that contact DNA, indicating that the capacities of c-Jun to function as a coactivator or as a DNA-bound transcription factor are mutually exclusive. Our observations indicate that the IL-1β locus is occupied by PU.1 and C/EBPβ and poised for expression and that c-Jun enhances transcription by facilitating a rate-limiting step, the assembly of the RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex, with minimal effect on the local chromatin status. We propose that the basic domain of other transcription factors may also be redirected from a DNA interaction mode to a protein-protein interaction mode and that this switch represents a novel mechanism regulating gene expression profiles.


2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (41) ◽  
pp. 35553-35561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidija Staresincic ◽  
Jane Walker ◽  
A. Barbara Dirac-Svejstrup ◽  
Richard Mitter ◽  
Jesper Q. Svejstrup

We identified XAB1 in a proteomic screen for factors that interact with human RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). Because XAB1 has a conserved Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue called Npa3, yeast genetics and biochemical analysis were used to dissect the significance of the interaction. Degron-dependent Npa3 depletion resulted in genome-wide transcription decreases, correlating with a loss of RNAPII from genes as measured by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Surprisingly, however, transcription in vitro was unaffected by Npa3, suggesting that it affects a process that is not required for transcription in yeast extracts. Indeed, Npa3 depletion in vivo affects nuclear localization of RNAPII; the polymerase accumulates in the cytoplasm. Npa3 is a member of the GPN-LOOP family of GTPases. Npa3 mutants that either cannot bind GTP or that bind but cannot hydrolyze it are inviable and unable to support nuclear transport of RNAPII. Surprisingly, we were unable to detect interactions between Npa3 and proteins in the classical importin α/β pathway for nuclear import. Interestingly, Npa3-RNAPII binding is significantly increased by the addition of GTP or its slowly hydrolyzable analogue guanosine 5′-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPγS). Moreover, the Npa3 mutant that binds GTP, but cannot hydrolyze it, binds RNAPII even in the absence of added GTP, whereas the mutant that cannot bind GTP is unable to bind the polymerase. Together, our data suggest that Npa3 defines an unconventional pathway for nuclear import of RNAPII, which involves GTP-dependent binding of Npa3 to the polymerase.


1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1639-1651 ◽  
Author(s):  
S C Batson ◽  
R Sundseth ◽  
C V Heath ◽  
M Samuels ◽  
U Hansen

We have studied the initiation of transcription in vitro by RNA polymerase II on simian virus 40 (SV40) minichromosomal templates isolated from infected cells. The efficiency and pattern of transcription from the chromatin templates were compared with those from viral DNA templates by using two in vitro transcription systems, either HeLa whole-cell extract or basal transcription factors, RNA polymerase II, and one of two SV40 promoter-binding transcription factors, LSF and Sp1. Dramatic increases in numbers of transcripts upon addition of transcription extract and different patterns of usage of the multiple SV40 initiation sites upon addition of Sp1 versus LSF strongly suggested that transcripts were being initiated from the minichromosomal templates in vitro. That the majority of transcripts from the minichromosomes were due to initiation de novo was demonstrated by the efficient transcription observed in the presence of alpha-amanitin, which inhibited minichromosome-associated RNA polymerase II, and an alpha-amanitin-resistant RNA polymerase II, which initiated transcription in vitro. The pattern of transcription from the SV40 late and early promoters on the minichromosomal templates was similar to the in vivo pattern of transcription during the late stages of viral infection and was distinct from the pattern of transcription generated from viral DNA in vitro. In particular, the late promoter of the minichromosomal templates was transcribed with high efficiency, similar to viral DNA templates, while the early-early promoter of the minichromosomal templates was inhibited 10- to 15-fold. Finally, the number of minichromosomes competent to initiate transcription in vitro exceeded the amount actively being transcribed in vivo.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (47) ◽  
pp. 15933-15947
Author(s):  
Yu Xu ◽  
Akanksha Manghrani ◽  
Bei Liu ◽  
Honglue Shi ◽  
Uyen Pham ◽  
...  

As the Watson–Crick faces of nucleobases are protected in dsDNA, it is commonly assumed that deleterious alkylation damage to the Watson–Crick faces of nucleobases predominantly occurs when DNA becomes single-stranded during replication and transcription. However, damage to the Watson–Crick faces of nucleobases has been reported in dsDNA in vitro through mechanisms that are not understood. In addition, the extent of protection from methylation damage conferred by dsDNA relative to ssDNA has not been quantified. Watson–Crick base pairs in dsDNA exist in dynamic equilibrium with Hoogsteen base pairs that expose the Watson–Crick faces of purine nucleobases to solvent. Whether this can influence the damage susceptibility of dsDNA remains unknown. Using dot-blot and primer extension assays, we measured the susceptibility of adenine-N1 to methylation by dimethyl sulfate (DMS) when in an A-T Watson–Crick versus Hoogsteen conformation. Relative to unpaired adenines in a bulge, Watson–Crick A-T base pairs in dsDNA only conferred ∼130-fold protection against adenine-N1 methylation, and this protection was reduced to ∼40-fold for A(syn)-T Hoogsteen base pairs embedded in a DNA-drug complex. Our results indicate that Watson–Crick faces of nucleobases are accessible to alkylating agents in canonical dsDNA and that Hoogsteen base pairs increase this accessibility. Given the higher abundance of dsDNA relative to ssDNA, these results suggest that dsDNA could be a substantial source of cytotoxic damage. The work establishes DMS probing as a method for characterizing A(syn)-T Hoogsteen base pairs in vitro and also lays the foundation for a sequencing approach to map A(syn)-T Hoogsteen and unpaired adenines genome-wide in vivo.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1290-1300
Author(s):  
H Watanabe ◽  
T Imai ◽  
P A Sharp ◽  
H Handa

Two kinds of trans-acting factors that regulate transcription from the promoter of the adenovirus early-region 4 (E4) have been identified by reconstituting nuclear extracts of HeLa cells. They were designated E4TF1 and E4TF3 for E4 transcription factors. These factors were responsible for efficient and accurate transcription in vitro from the E4 promoter, as were another transcription factor, designated E4TF2, and a crude fraction containing endogenous RNA polymerase II. E4TF1 stimulated transcription from the E4 promoter but not from the major late promoter or the E4 mutant promoter lacking the E4TF1-binding site. Footprint analysis of E4TF1 revealed that it binds to a specific region, residing between 132 and 152 base pairs upstream from the initiation site of the E4 mRNA. E4TF3 also regulated transcription from the E4 promoter. E4TF3 protected four ca. 20-base-pair regions in a DNase I footprinting assay. They were located around 40, 160, 230, and 260 base pairs upstream from the initiation site of E4 mRNA. Specific inhibition of E4 transcription was observed by addition of DNA fragments covering one of the E4TF1- and E4TF3-binding sites to in vitro transcription assays. These results suggest that both E4TF1 and E4TF3 regulate E4 transcription by binding to the specific upstream elements in the E4 promoter. These factors may be involved in the E1A transactivation of E4 transcription.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. SCI-28-SCI-28
Author(s):  
Koichi Akashi

Abstract SCI-28 Lineage commitment should involve selective and temporally-regulated expression of essential genes. In multi- or oligo-potent progenitors, the expression of oligo-lineage-affiliated genes is primed: oligo-lineage genes are co-expressed prior to the commitment at the single cell level, and once lineage fate is decided, genes of irrelevant lineages are immediately downregulated. For example, single common myeloid progenitors (CMP) co-express both granulocyte/monocyte-affiliated and megakaryocyte/erythroid-affiliated genes. The priming of these lineage-restricted genes could be dependent also upon the priming of lineage-specific transcription factors. Consistent with this hypothesis, a population with potent CMP activity that co-express both PU.1 (myeloid) and GATA-1 (erythroid) transcription factors was newly identified by using mice having PU.1 and GATA-1 reporters. In downstream of such “priming” stage, the order of expression as well as the level of expression of multiple transcription factors plays a critical role in reading-out specific lineages. The precise regulation of transcription factors should be critical to maintain hematopoietic homeostasis, and the deregulation of transcription factor expression could induce leukemic transformation. To understand the regulation machinery upstream of transcription factors, we are currently attempting to model an epigenetic landscape in hematopoietic development. Genome-wide analysis of histone positioning revealed that a histone variant marks hematopoietic transcription factors and other lineage-related genes prior to commitment, and therefore the variant can predict the actively-transcribed region in a later stage of hematopoiesis. For example, in hematopoietic stem cells, the histone marking was observed broadly in genes-related to myelo-erythroid and lymphoid genes, while in committed progenitors, it was restricted to specific lineages such as myeloid, erythroid and/or lymphoid genes. These results suggest that the genome marking by a histone variant should be a primary event for initiating lineage commitment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
pp. jbc.RA120.015876
Author(s):  
Yating Wang ◽  
Liming Hou ◽  
M. Behfar Ardehali ◽  
Robert E. Kingston ◽  
Brian D Dynlacht

Elongin is an RNA polymerase II (RNAPII)-associated factor that has been shown to stimulate transcriptional elongation in vitro. The Elongin complex is thought to be required for transcriptional induction in response to cellular stimuli and to ubiquitinate RNAPII in response to DNA damage. Yet the impact of the Elongin complex on transcription in vivo has not been well studied. Here, we performed comprehensive studies of the role of Elongin A, the largest subunit of the Elongin complex, on RNAPII transcription genome-wide. Our results suggest that Elongin A localizes to actively transcribed regions and potential enhancers, and the level of recruitment correlated with transcription levels. We also identified a large group of factors involved in transcription as Elongin A-associated factors. In addition, we found that loss of Elongin A leads to dramatically reduced levels of Ser2-phosphorylated, but not total, RNAPII, and cells depleted of Elongin A show stronger promoter RNAPII pausing, suggesting that Elongin A may be involved in the release of paused RNAPII. Our RNA-seq studies suggest that loss of Elongin A did not alter global transcription, and unlike prior in vitro studies, we did not observe a dramatic impact on RNAPII elongation rates in our cell-based nascent RNA-seq experiments upon Elongin A depletion. Taken together, our studies provide the first comprehensive analysis of the role of Elongin A in regulating transcription in vivo. Our studies also revealed that unlike prior in vitro findings, depletion of Elongin A has little impact on global transcription profiles and transcription elongation in vivo.


1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 2021-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
D E Ayer ◽  
W S Dynan

Unlike most genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II, the simian virus 40 late transcription unit does not have a TATA box. To determine what sequences are required for initiation at the major late mRNA cap site of simian virus 40, clustered point mutations were constructed and tested for transcriptional activity in vitro and in vivo. Three promoter elements were defined. The first is centered 31 base pairs upstream of the cap site in a position normally reserved for a TATA box. The second is at the cap site. The third occupies a novel position centered 28 base pairs downstream of the cap site within a protein-coding sequence. The ability of RNA polymerase II to recognize this promoter suggests that there is greater variation in promoter architecture than had been believed previously.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document