Budget Impact Analysis of Treating Chemotherapy Patients with Health Care Provider-Administered Tbo-Filgrastim, Filgrastim-Sndz, and Filgrastim in the United States

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2407-2407
Author(s):  
Holly Trautman ◽  
Erika Szabo ◽  
Francesco Lo-Coco ◽  
Elizabeth James ◽  
Susan Gabriel ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are often administered to reduce the incidence, severity, and duration of febrile neutropenia in chemotherapy patients. Tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz are short-acting G-CSFs with comparable efficacy and safety to that of filgrastim. The present analysis estimated the budget impact of increasing utilization of health care provider (HCP)-administered tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz on patients with nonmyeloid malignancies treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy from a US payer perspective. Methods: An interactive budget impact model was developed to estimate the changes in drug and administration costs for a 1 million member health plan. Administration by an HCP (within a clinic or other outpatient setting) was assumed for 80% of patients receiving short-acting G-CSF treatment, with the majority (85%) of products adjudicated through the patient's medical benefit/provided by the HCP and the remaining 15% purchased through the patient's pharmacy benefit. For medical benefit adjudication, the model projected increases in the market share of tbo-filgrastim from 37% to 42% and filgrastim-sndz from 2% to 4% (with a decrease in filgrastim market share from 61% to 54%). For pharmacy benefit adjudication, the model projected increases in the market share of tbo-filgrastim from <1% to 2% and filgrastim-sndz from 5% to 7% (with a decrease in filgrastim market share from 95% to 91%). Base case data were derived from publicly available resources. The overall plan budget impact was calculated using a 1-year time horizon, along with the difference in per-member per-year (PMPY) cost between the current and future scenarios; one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The effective annual plan per-patient drug cost totaled between $11,904 and $27,199, depending on dose, presentation, and benefit adjudication, for tbo-filgrastim, between $15,418 and $26,015 for filgrastim-sndz, and between $15,573 and $30,663 for filgrastim. The estimated overall annual plan cost associated with HCP-administered short-acting G-CSFs was $177,151,918 (PMPY = $177.15) in the current scenario and $175,230,445 (PMPY = $175.23) in the future scenario. Cost savings totaled $1,921,473 (PMPY = $1.92). The model was most sensitive to changes in the overall proportion of patients with HCP-administered G-CSFs and to HCP filgrastim acquisition cost. Conclusions: Budget impact analyses examine the financial impact associated with the introduction of new treatments or shifting existing treatment patterns in order to help decision makers determine how best to allocate resources. The majority of HCP-administered G-CSF is adjudicated through the medical benefit, where the effective annual plan per-patient drug cost was lowest for tbo-filgrastim (24% lower cost than filgrastim). For the remainder of HCP-administered G-CSF adjudicated through the pharmacy benefit, the effective annual plan per-patient drug cost was lowest for filgrastim-sndz (15% lower cost than filgrastim). The present analysis estimated an annual US health plan cost savings approaching $2 million overall or almost $2.00 PMPY following an increase of market share by approximately 5% for tbo-filgrastim and 2% for filgrastim-sndz. Disclosures Trautman: Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Szabo:Patient Centered Outcomes Research (PCORI): Consultancy; Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Eli Lilly & Company; Zoetis: Equity Ownership. Lo-Coco:Teva, Novartis, Baxalta, Pfizer: Consultancy; Teva, Lundbeck: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. James:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Gabriel:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Pathak:Teva Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tang:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4786-4786
Author(s):  
Holly Trautman ◽  
Erika Szabo ◽  
Francesco Lo-Coco ◽  
Elizabeth James ◽  
Susan Gabriel ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Neutropenia is a common complication in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies. Severe and febrile neutropenia are associated with prolonged hospitalization, serious infections and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, increased medical costs, and increased mortality. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are often administered to reduce the incidence, severity, and duration of febrile neutropenia in chemotherapy patients. The present analysis estimated the budget impact of increasing utilization of patient (home)-administered tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy from a US payer perspective. Methods: An interactive budget impact model was developed to estimate the changes in drug costs associated with projected increases in the market share of tbo-filgrastim from 5% to 10% and filgrastim-sndz from 10% to 12% (with a corresponding decrease in filgrastim market share from 85% to 78%) for a 1 million-member health plan. Patient self-administration at home was assumed for 20% of patients receiving short-acting G-CSF treatment; all products were purchased through the patient's pharmacy benefit and were assumed to have Tier 3 formulary status with a patient co-pay of $54 per prescription. Base-case data were derived from publicly available resources. The overall plan budget impact was calculated using a 1-year time horizon, along with the difference in per-member per-year (PMPY) cost between the current and future scenarios; one-way sensitivity analyses were conducted. Results: The effective annual plan per-patient drug cost totaled between $16,961 and $27,199, depending on dose and presentation, for tbo-filgrastim, between $16,216 and $26,015 for filgrastim-sndz, and between $19,134 and $30,663 for filgrastim. The estimated overall annual plan cost associated with short-acting G-CSFs was $53,298,217 (PMPY = $53.30) in the current scenario and $52,828,832 (PMPY = $52.82) in the future scenario. Estimated cost savings totaled $469,385 (PMPY = $0.48). The model was most sensitive to changes in the overall proportion of patients self-administering G-CSFs at home and to the wholesale acquisition cost for filgrastim. Conclusions: The effective annual plan per-patient drug cost for tbo-filgrastim and filgrastim-sndz was lower by 11% and 15%, respectively, as compared with filgrastim. The present analysis estimated an annual US health plan cost savings approaching $0.5 million overall or $0.50 PMPY following an increase of market share by approximately 5% for tbo-filgrastim and 2% for filgrastim-sndz. Disclosures Trautman: Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Szabo:Eli Lilly & Company; Zoetis: Equity Ownership; Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment; Patient Centered Outcomes Research (PCORI): Consultancy. Lo-Coco:Teva, Lundbeck: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Teva, Novartis, Baxalta, Pfizer: Consultancy. James:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Gabriel:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Pathak:Teva Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tang:Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Al-Kadem ◽  
Mohammad Gomaa ◽  
Karam Al Yateem ◽  
Abdulmonam Al Maghlouth

Abstract The Cement Packer approach has been successfully implemented to pursue and monetize minor gas reservoirs of poorer quality. Due to its critical role in power supply to meet the nation's needs, license to operate gas fields oftentimes come with contractual obligations to deliver a certain threshold of gas capacity. The cement packer method is a cheaper alternative to workovers that enables operators to build gas capacity by monetizing minor gas reservoirs at lower cost. Group 1 reservoirs are the shallowest hydrocarbon bearing sand with poorer reservoir quality and relatively thin reservoirs. The behind-casing-opportunities in Minor Group-1 reservoirs previously required a relatively costly pull-tubing rig workover to monetize the reservoir. Opportunities in two wells were optimized from pull –tubing rig workovers to a non-rig program by implementing Cement Packer applications. The tubing was punched to create tubing-casing communication and cement was subsequently pumped through the tubing and into the casing. The hardened cement then acted as a barrier to satisfy operating guidelines. The reservoir was then additionally perforated, flow tested and successfully monetized at a lower cost. Tubing and casing integrity tests prior to well entry demonstrated good tubing and casing integrity. This is critical to ensure that cement will only flow into the casing where the tubing was punched. Once the cement hardened, pressure test from the tubing and from the casing indicated that the cement has effectively isolated both tubulars. Subsequent Cement Bond Log and Ultrasonic Imaging Tool showed fair to good cement above the target perforation depth. These data supported the fact that the cement packer was solid and the reservoir was ready for additional perforation. Taking into account the reservoir quality, it was decided to perforate the reservoir twice with the biggest gun available to ensure the lowest skin possible. Post perforation, there was a sharp increase in the tubing pressure indicating pressure influx from the reservoir. Despite that, casing pressure remained low, confirming no communication and thus the success of the cement packer.The well was later able to unload naturally due to its high reservoir pressure, confirming the producibility of the reservoirs and unlocking similar opportunities in other wells. Additionally, the cement packer approach delivered tremendous cost savings between $6 – 8 mil per well. Besides confirming the reservoirs' producibility,the success also unlocked additional shallow gas behind casing opportunities in the area.This method will now be the first-choice option to monetize any hydrocarbon resources in reservoirs located above the top packer.


2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary A. Noskin ◽  
Robert J. Rubin ◽  
Jerome J. Schentag ◽  
Jan Kluytmans ◽  
Edwin C. Hedblom ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the economic impact of performing rapid testing for Staphylococcus aureus colonization before admission for all inpatients who are scheduled to undergo elective surgery and providing subsequent decolonization therapy for those patients found to be colonized with S. aureus.Methods.A budget impact model that used probabilistic sensitivity analysis to account for the uncertainties in the input variables was developed. Primary input variables included the marginal effect of S. aureus infection on patient outcomes among patients who underwent elective surgery, patient demographic characteristics, the prevalence of nasal carriage of S. aureus, the sensitivity and specificity of the rapid diagnostic test for S. aureus colonization, the efficacy of decolonization therapy for nasal carriage of S. aureus, and cost data. Data sources for the input variables included the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample data and the published literature.Results.In 2003, there were an estimated 7,181,484 patients admitted to US hospitals for elective surgery. Our analysis indicated preadmission testing and subsequent decolonization therapy for patients colonized with S. aureus would have produced a mean annual cost savings to US hospitals of $231,538,400 (95% confidence interval [CI], -$300 million to $1.3 billion). The mean annual number of hospital-days that could have been eliminated was estimated at 364,919 days (95% CI, 67,893-926,983 days), and a mean of 935 in-hospital deaths (95% CI, 88-3,691) could have been avoided per year. Sensitivity analysis indicated a 64.5% probability that there would be cost savings to US hospitals as a result of preadmission testing and subsequent decolonization therapy.Conclusion.The addition of preadmission testing and decolonization therapy to standard care would result in significant cost savings, even after accounting for variations in the model input values.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 576-583
Author(s):  
Chloé Herledan ◽  
Florence Ranchon ◽  
Vérane Schwiertz ◽  
Amandine Baudouin ◽  
Lionel Karlin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S732-S732
Author(s):  
James Karichu ◽  
Mindy Cheng ◽  
Joanna Sickler ◽  
Julie Munakata ◽  
S Pinar Bilir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis is common in the United States (US). Each year, approximately 12 million people seek medical care for pharyngitis, accounting for ~2% of ambulatory care visits. The gold standard method for diagnosing GAS is culture. However, because culture is time intensive, rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs), with or without culture confirmation, are commonly used. Although RADTs provide results quickly, test sensitivity has been shown to be sub-optimal, which can lead to inappropriate treatment decisions. Recently, highly sensitive point-of-care nucleic acid amplification tests (POC NAAT), such as the cobas® Liat® System, have emerged. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) and budget impact (BI) of adopting POC NAAT compared with RADT+culture confirmation to diagnose GAS pharyngitis from the US third-party payer perspective. Methods A decision-tree economic model was developed in Microsoft Excel to quantify costs and clinical outcomes associated with POC NAAT and RADT+culture over a one-year period. All model inputs were derived from published literature and public databases. Model outputs included costs and clinical effects measured as quality-adjusted life days (QALDs) lost. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of uncertainty on results. Results CE analysis showed that POC NAAT would cost $44 per patient compared with $78 with RADT+ culture. POC NAAT was associated with fewer QALDs lost relative to RADT+ culture. Therefore, POC NAAT may be considered the “dominant” strategy (i.e., lower costs and higher effectiveness). Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. BI analysis showed that adopting POC NAAT for diagnosis of GAS could yield cost-savings of 0.3% vs. current budget over 3 years. This is due to savings associated with testing, GAS-related complications, antibiotic treatment and treatment-associated complication costs. Conclusion Results suggest that adopting POC NAAT to diagnose GAS would be considered cost-effective and yield cost-savings for US payers relative to RADT+culture. Access to POC NAAT would be important to optimize appropriate GAS diagnosis and treatment decisions. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Sup8) ◽  
pp. S25-S29
Author(s):  
Kirstine Farrer ◽  
Emma Rose ◽  
Dave Haynes ◽  
Steven Edwards ◽  
John McLaughlin

Older adults in the community are at risk of malnutrition and dehydration. The present article aims to outline an intervention and a population-health approach to raise awareness of the importance of good nutrition and hydration in later life. This was addressed by developing strong partnership working, governance frameworks and local steering committees. Through the Greater Manchester Nutrition and Hydration Programme, 39 500 older people have been asked about appetite and weight loss and/or used the PaperWeight Armband to date. A total of 5586 people from this population were found to be at risk of malnutrition. All were provided resources, advice and signposting to address this issue. The gross fiscal return on investment over a 5-year period was 3.2-fold and the net present budget impact was £800 000. The long-term cashable fiscal return on investment was estimated at 2.69. This very promising approach has potential to enable older adults to extend their healthy life span and deliver cost savings to the health and care system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document