scholarly journals Phase 1 Study of REGN1979, an Anti-CD20 x Anti-CD3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with CD20+ B-Cell Malignancies Previously Treated with CD20-Directed Antibody Therapy

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 621-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajat Bannerji ◽  
Jennifer R. Brown ◽  
Ranjana H Advani ◽  
Jon Arnason ◽  
Susan M. O'Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Tumor Pain ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Introduction: REGN1979 is a hinge-stabilized CD20xCD3bispecific full-length antibody (Ab) based on an IgG4isotype modified to reduce Fc binding. It is designed to bind T cells (via CD3) and CD20-expressing cells. Cross-linking results in specific, local T cell activation and engagement ofcytolytic functions, independent of T cell receptor mediated recognition. This mechanism of action (MOA) is distinct from approved anti-CD20 Abs, and may provide additional therapeutic benefit. This report describes safety and clinical outcomes in 25 patients (pts) treated with REGN1979. Methods: The study uses a 3+3 design to assess safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and activity of REGN1979 inpts with NHL and CLL, in separate dose escalation cohorts. REGN1979 is administered IV over 1-4 hours, weekly (QW) for 4 doses followed by every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 5 doses. Each dose level (DL) consists of an initial starting dose followed by a higher (step-up) dose.Pts with either progressive disease (PD) after initial response or suboptimal initial response could be retreated. Results: As of clinical cut-off, 25pts had been enrolled and treated with REGN1979 at flat doses ranging from 0.03 - 3.0 mg: 20pts with NHLand 5pts with CLL. NHL subtypes included DLBCL (n=12), FL (n=6), and MCL (n=2). Allpts hada medianof3 (range 1-7) prior regimens, and received a median of 5 (range 2-9) doses of REGN1979. Sixpts remained on initial treatment, 3pts completed treatment, and 16pts discontinued treatment (14 for PD; 2 subject decision). Of 4pts who entered retreatment, 2pts remained ongoing. The most common treatment-related treatment-emergent AEs (TR-TEAEs) were pyrexia (56%), infusionrelated reaction (IRR) (40%), chills (36%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (28%), fatigue (24%), tachycardia (24%), hypomagnesaemia (20%) and hypotension (20%). Grade >= 3 TR-TEAEs occurred in 8 pts(32%): IRR (12%), CRS (8%), hypotension (8%), and pyrexia, tachycardia, dyspnea, anemia, hypoxia, hypertension, tachypnea, transaminases increased, and tumor pain each in 1 pt(4%). All were grade 3 with the exception of 1 ptwith grade 4 hypotension. There were no protocol-defined DLTs, nor grade 5 TEAE. No ptsdiscontinued REGN1979 due to TR-TEAE. IRR and CRS events were most commonly reported with the first administration of both initial and step-up dose with incidence and severity decreasing with increasing exposure. Tenptsreported at least one TR-SAE: CRS (24%), IRR (20%), and increased AST and tumor pain, each in 1pt(4%). Threeptswith aggressive lymphoma who discontinued REGN1979 due to PD died of their disease within 30 days of their last dose. Notably, modifications to pre-medication(s) and drug administration instructions have improved tolerability (fewer and less severe IRR/CRS). No clinically significant CNS TEAEs have been observed. CT-based (Cheson, 2007) anti-tumor activity was observed in 11 ptswith NHL: PR [n=4,median duration of 50d];SD [n=7, median duration of >196d]. The overall response rate (ORR) in NHL ptsacross DLs was 20%. In 2 highest dose levels, ORR was 27% (Fig 1). Of the 14pts evaluated by PET, 4pts had a partial metabolic response, withmedian duration of 244d perLugano Criteria. Twopts with CLL attained SD as best overall response. PK: REGN1979 concentrations in serum increased with increasing DL and were variable across pts. Variability was less at higher DLs and also decreased over time during therapy. At DLs tested, REGN1979 concentrations did not notably increase over time during treatment. PD/Cytokines: At the lowest dose tested, 0.03 mg, transient B-cell depletion was observed inpts with measurable circulating B cells.Samples from 12pts were available for cytokine analysis. Interim analysis indicates REGN1979 induces cytokine release as expected based on MOA. An increase in IL-6, IL-10 and to lesser extent IFN-γ was observed. The magnitude of cytokine response generally correlated with symptomatic IRR/CRS. Conclusion: REGN1979 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at flat doses of 0.03 - 3.0 mg (< 1% of rituximab dose) inpts with NHL and CLL. Most TEAEs were associated with IRR/CRS, and were managed with supportive therapy and modification to REGN1979 administration. No clinically significant neurological toxicity was observed. Preliminary antitumor activity demonstrates increased activity at higher doses. Dose escalation and treatment schedule optimization continue. Disclosures Brown: Acetylon, Gilead: Research Funding; Celgene, Roche/Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, ProNai, Sun BioPharma: Consultancy. Arnason:Gilead: Consultancy. O'Brien:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chavez:Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Ansell:BMS, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Celldex and Affimed: Research Funding. Topp:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel; Boehringer: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel. Adriaens:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ufkin:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kostic:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paccaly:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gao:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trail:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lowy:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brownstein:Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals CD20-Tcb (RG6026), a Novel "2:1" Format T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibody, Induces Complete Remissions in Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Preliminary Results from a Phase I First in Human Trial

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 226-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Gloria Iacoboni ◽  
Franck Morschhauser ◽  
Fritz Offner ◽  
Anna Sureda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Bispecific Antibody ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Cytokine Release ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Despite advancements in outcomes with the introduction of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, a substantial proportion of B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (B-NHL) patients do not sustain a durable response to standard of care treatment. T-cell bispecific antibodies (TCBs) represent a new class of disease-targeting agents shown to activate T-cells to kill cancer cells, offering this exciting mechanism of action with 'off the shelf' availability. CD20-TCB (RG6026) is a novel T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody whose "2:1" format possesses two CD20 binders in addition to a CD3 binder, enabling increased tumor antigen avidity, rapid T-cell activation, and enhanced tumor cell killing. NP30179 is a multicenter phase I dose escalation trial investigating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), biomarker responses, and antitumor activity (assessed by overall response rate [ORR] and complete response rate [CR] per Lugano 2014 criteria) of single agent CD20-TCB. Patients receive escalating doses of CD20-TCB as intravenous infusions with dose escalation guided by a model implementing the Bayesian continuous reassessment method with overdose control. In order to reduce the potential risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) induced by CD20-TCB mediated systemic T-cell activation, a single dose of 1000 mg obinutuzumab (G) pretreatment (Gpt) is administered seven days prior to start of CD20-TCB and has preclinically been shown to debulk peripheral B cells and reduce systemic cytokine release (Bacac et al. Clin Canc Res 2018). As of July 29th 2018 a total of 64 patients (pts) with aggressive r/r B-NHL (DLBCL/PMBCL/trFL/Richter´s transformation (n=47)) and indolent r/r B-NHL (FL(n=17)) received CD20-TCB doses ranging from 5 µg to 1800 µg in a Q2W schedule. Median age was 64 years (range 28-82), 61% were male, median prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-10). A single DLT (myocardial infarction) was observed at 220 µg and until the maximum tested dose CD20-TCB was well tolerated. The most reported AEs were pyrexia (n=14, all Gr 1 and 2), neutropenia (all grades n=17, Gr 3 and 4 n=14) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS, n=14, all Grade 1-2 according to the criteria by Lee et al. Blood 2014). Two patients received tocilizumab for CRS management all CRS events were manageable and resolved, without leading to dose reduction or study withdrawal. No CNS toxicity was reported so far in this study. Fifty-five pts had at least one post-baseline response assessment and were eligible for efficacy analysis. Responses were observed from 15 µg onwards, and complete responses (CR) occurred from 300 µg onwards following two cycles of treatment. At doses of 300 µg or above (n=29) the ORR and CR rate by investigator assessment was 38% and 24%, respectively (FL: 3/5 pts and 2/5 pts respectively, aggressive B-NHL: 8/24 pts and 5/24 pts respectively). All CRs are sustained thus far with a median follow up 96 days (range 26-152). Responses were seen across various NHL subtypes and across prognostic factors such as prior lines of therapy, refractoriness to the most recent line of therapy, tumor burden, and IPI or FLIPI. CD20-TCB exposure and receptor occupancy increased dose-dependently across the investigated dose range; dose-escalation is continuing to optimize these factors. No anti-drug-antibodies have occurred. CD20-TCB is a novel 2:1 format T-cell-engaging bispecific antibody which already at suboptimal doses displays promising clinical activity in heavily-pretreated B-NHL. In addition, Gpt has shown clinical proof of principle as an approach to efficiently mitigate CRS. An update on safety and efficacy as well as biomarker data will be presented. Disclosures Hutchings: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Iacoboni:Celgene: Other: Travel funding; Roche: Honoraria. Morschhauser:Janssen: Other: Scientific Lectures; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Consultancy; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sureda:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Salles:Janssen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Carlo-Stella:Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; MSD: Other: Advisory Board; Genenta Science: Other: Advisory Board; BMS: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; AstraZeneca: Other: Advisory Board; ADC Therapeutics: Other: Advisory Board. Martinez Lopez:Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Thomas:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Morcos:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Quackenbush:Roche: Employment. Ferlini:Roche: Employment. Bacac:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.: Employment, Other: stock, Patents & Royalties. Broeske:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dimier:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership. Moore:Roche: Employment. Weisser:Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Dickinson:GSK: Consultancy.

Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim Treatment of Patients with Low or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) Receiving Lenalidomide.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1770-1770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger M Lyons ◽  
Richard A. Larson ◽  
Michael A. Kosmo ◽  
Sunil Gandhi ◽  
Delong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Dose Reductions ◽  
Platelet Transfusions

Abstract Abstract 1770 Poster Board I-796 Introduction Romiplostim is a peptibody protein designed to increase platelet production by binding to and activating the thrombopoietin receptor. Low platelet counts in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) may be due to the underlying disease or to treatment with disease-modifying agents, and platelet transfusions are often the only treatment for clinically significant thrombocytopenia (CST) or bleeding. This was a phase 2 multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study that evaluated the effect of romiplostim on the incidence of clinically significant thrombocytopenic events (grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia and/or receipt of platelet transfusions) and the safety of romiplostim in patients with low or intermediate risk MDS receiving lenalidomide. Patients and Methods Patients who were ≥18 years old, had MDS by bone marrow exam and WHO criteria, had low or Intermediate-1 risk category MDS using the IPSS, and were planning to receive lenalidomide were eligible. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 into treatment groups receiving placebo, 500 μg romiplostim, or 750 μg romiplostim by weekly subcutaneous injections in combination with lenalidomide (one 10 mg capsule by mouth daily for each 28-day cycle). Treatments continued for a total of four cycles. Results The median age of the 39 randomized patients was 74 years (range, 39 to 90); 15 (39%) had platelet counts <50 × 109/L, and 7 (18%) had del(5q). We report trends due to baseline imbalances between treatment groups, likely due to the limited sample size. The overall incidence rates of CST appeared to be greater in the placebo group than either romiplostim group (Table). In contrast to the placebo patients, median platelet counts remained above 50 × 109/L in both the 500 μg and 750 μg romiplostim groups for the treatment period. The incidence of platelet transfusions appeared to be lower in the 500 μg romiplostim group, and the incidence of adverse events was comparable between all of the groups. No deaths were reported during the treatment period. Twelve patients (31%) discontinued the study. Disease progression to AML was reported in 1 patient in the romiplostim 500 μg group. The patient withdrew consent and discontinued the study. No bone marrow was available to confirm AML by protocol-defined criteria. Fewer lenalidomide dose reductions and delays due to thrombocytopenia were seen in both of the romiplostim treated groups. The proportion of patients who achieved an MDS treatment response was 8%, 36% and 15% for the placebo, 500 μg romiplostim, and 750 μg romiplostim groups, respectively. MDS response rates appeared higher in the romiplostim group, regardless of baseline del(5q) status. Baseline imbalance between groups due to the small sample size limited our interpretation of the data. Conclusions Romiplostim appeared to be well-tolerated in low and intermediate risk MDS patients receiving lenalidomide. This preliminary information suggests that romiplostim may reduce the rate of clinically significant thrombocytopenic events in these patients while increasing platelet counts and decreasing the incidence of lenalidomide dose reductions and delays due to thrombocytopenia Disclosures Lyons: GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Johnson&Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: Use of romiplostim to treat Thrombocytopenia in MDS. Larson:Amgen Inc.: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Liu:Amgen Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hu:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Franklin:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Berger:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

A Phase I/II Trial of the KSP Inhibitor ARRY-520 In Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1959-1959 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jatin J Shah ◽  
Jeffrey A. Zonder ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
Donna Weber ◽  
Sheeba Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ksp Inhibitor

Abstract Abstract 1959 Background: Kinesin Spindle Protein (KSP) is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Inhibition of KSP induces mitotic arrest and cell death. ARRY-520 is a potent, selective KSP inhibitor. Cancers such as multiple myeloma (MM) which depend on the short-lived survival protein MCL-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520. ARRY-520 shows potent activity in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ARRY-520 administered intravenously (IV) on Day 1 and Day 2 q 2 weeks without/with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (RR) MM with 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent, unless ineligible for or refusing to receive this therapy) were eligible. Cohorts of at least 3 pts were enrolled in a classical 3 + 3 dose escalation design. Pts were treated for 2 cycles (4 weeks) to evaluate safety prior to dose escalation. Results: Twenty five pts have been treated to date, with a median age of 60 years (range 44–79) and a median of 5 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received prior bortezomib or carfilzomib, 21 pts received prior lenalidomide, 17 pts prior thalidomide, and 18 pts had a prior stem cell transplant. Pts received ARRY-520 without G-CSF at 1 mg/m2/day (n = 3), and at 1.25 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable). A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of Grade 4 neutropenia was observed at 1.25 mg/m2/day, and this was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the DLT, dose escalation with prophylactic G-CSF support was initiated, at doses of 1.5 mg/m2/day (n = 7, 6 evaluable), 2.0 mg/m2/day (n = 6) and 2.25 mg/m2/day (n = 2) with G-CSF. Both the 2.0 mg/m2/day and 2.25 mg/m2/day dose levels were determined to be non-tolerated, with DLTs of febrile neutropenia (FN) (2 pts at 2.0 mg/m2/day and both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day) and Grade 3 mucositis (both pts at 2.25 mg/m2/day). One out of 6 evaluable pts at 1.5 mg/m2/day also developed a DLT of FN. In an attempt to optimize the Phase 2 dose, an intermediate dose level of 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF is currently being evaluated. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) include those observed with other KSP inhibitors, such as hematological AEs (thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia), fatigue, mucositis and other gastro-intestinal AEs. Pts displayed linear PK, a low clearance and a moderate volume of distribution, with moderate-to-high inter-individual variability in PK parameters. The median terminal elimination half life is 65 hours. The preliminary efficacy signal as a single agent is encouraging with 2 partial responses (PR) observed to date per IMWG and EBMT criteria in a heavily pretreated population (23 evaluable pts). A bortezomib-refractory pt with 8 prior lines of therapy, including a tandem transplant, treated at 1 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520 obtained a PR after Cycle 6, with urine protein and kappa light chain levels continuing to decline over time. He remains on-study after 15 months of ARRY-520 treatment. A pt with 2 prior lines of therapy, including prior carfilzomib, has obtained a PR after Cycle 8 at 2 mg/m2/day of ARRY-520, and she is currently ongoing after 4.5 months on therapy. Fifteen pts had a best response of stable disease (SD), including 1 pt with a thus far unconfirmed minimal response, and 6 had progressive disease. A total of 10 pts (43%) achieved a PR or SD lasting > 12 weeks. Several additional pts have shown other evidence of clinical activity, with decrease in paraproteins, increase in hemoglobin levels and regression of plasmacytomas. The median number of cycles is 4 (range 1–28+). Treatment activity has not correlated with any baseline characteristics or disease parameters to date. Conclusions: : The selective KSP inhibitor ARRY-520 has been well tolerated, and shows promising signs of single agent clinical activity in heavily pretreated pts with RR MM. Prophylactic G-CSF has enabled higher doses to be tolerated. No cardiovascular or liver enzyme toxicity has been reported. Enrollment is ongoing at 1.75 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support, and a planned Phase 2 part of the study will be initiated as soon as the MTD is determined. Complete Phase 1 data will be disclosed at the time of the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Revlimid (lenalidomide) in combination with dexamethasone is indicated for the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Zonder:Millennium: Consultancy, Myeloma and Amyloidosis Patient Day Symposium – Corporate support from multiple sponsors for a one-day educational event, Research Funding; Celgene:; Novartis:; Proteolix: . Weber:novartis-unpaid consultant: Consultancy; Merck- unpaid consultant: Consultancy; celgene- none for at least 2 years: Honoraria; millenium-none for 2 years: Honoraria; celgene, Millenium, Merck: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy. Walker:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Freeman:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rush:Array Biopharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ptaszynski:Array Biopharma: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Onyx: Advisory Board, Consultancy; Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, Onyx, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding.

Safety and Immunogenicity Of Inactivated Varicella-Zoster Virus Vaccine In Adults With Hematologic Malignancies Receiving Treatment With Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibodies

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2290-2290
Author(s):  
Shelly McNeil ◽  
Robert Betts ◽  
Steven Lawrence ◽  
Andrea Velardi ◽  
Eva Kimby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Monoclonal Antibodies ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Varicella Zoster ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ifn Γ ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Background Herpes zoster (HZ) incidence is higher in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) (25-100 cases/1000 person-years) than in the general population (3-5 cases/1000 person-years). This immunocompromised population can experience significant morbidity and occasional mortality from complications associated with reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus (VZV). In general, there is limited data in the literature regarding the effect of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, used in treatment of HM patients, on vaccine-related cell-mediated immune response. Due to the potential negative impact of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies on vaccine immunogenicity and efficacy, HM patients receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies have been excluded from prior inactivated VZV vaccine (inactivated-ZV) studies. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of inactivated-ZV in HM patients receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy. Methods This was an open label, single arm, multicenter Phase I study of a 4-dose inactivated-ZV regimen (∼30 days between each dose) in patients ≥18 years old with HM receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies either as a single agent or in a combination chemotherapy regimen and not likely to undergo HCT (n=80). Blood samples were collected at baseline prior to dose 1 and 28 days postdose 4 to measure VZV-specific T-cell responses using interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (IFN-γ ELISPOT). The primary hypothesis was that inactivated-ZV would elicit significant VZV-specific immune responses at ∼28 days postdose 4, with the statistical criterion being that the lower bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) on the geometric fold rise (GMFR) be >1.0. All vaccinated patients were evaluated for adverse events (AE), including VZV-like rashes, through 28 days postdose 4. Results The 4-dose inactivated-ZV regimen elicited a statistically significant VZV-specific immune response measured by IFN-γ ELISPOT at 28 days postdose 4 in the per-protocol population (GMFR = 4.34 [90% CI: 3.01, 6.24], p-value <0.001). As the lower bound of the 2-sided 90% CI for GMFR was >1.0, the pre-specified primary immunogenicity success criterion was met. Overall, 85% (68/80) of patients reported ≥1 AEs, 44% (35/80) reported ≥1 injection-site AEs, and 74% (59/80) reported ≥1 systemic AEs. The most common injection-site AEs were pain (32%), erythema (31%), and swelling (26%). The most common systemic AEs were pyrexia (25%) and diarrhea (14%). Twelve patients (15%) experienced serious AEs, including one event determined by the investigator to be vaccine-related (convulsion: day 8 postdose 1). One patient experienced a fatal serious AE (Richter’s transformation to Hodgkin’s disease; day 34 postdose 1) assessed as not vaccine-related by the investigator. In general, the frequencies of AEs did not increase with subsequent doses of vaccine. No inactivated-ZV recipient had a rash that was PCR positive for VZV vaccine strain. Conclusions In adults with HM receiving anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, inactivated-ZV was well tolerated and elicited statistically significant VZV-specific T-cell responses ∼28 days postdose 4. Disclosures: McNeil: Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Betts:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Lawrence:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Velardi:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Kimby:Merck: investigator Other, Research Funding. Pagnoni:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stek:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhao:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chan:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lee:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership. Parrino:Merck: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Patterns of Total Costs of Care for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2656-2656
Author(s):  
Steven R. Arikian ◽  
Dejan Milentijevic ◽  
Gary Binder ◽  
Mara Silvia Monzini ◽  
X Henry Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Direct Costs ◽  
Drug Costs ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Monthly Total ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Introduction: As clinical evidence has mounted in support of novel agents and longer treatment (Tx) durations for patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), questions have arisen regarding the economic impact of extending time to progression (TTP) in these pts, and the cost consequences once pts relapse and move to a second line of Tx. Previous analysis showed that relapsed myeloma pts incurred higher monthly costs once they advanced to later lines of Tx (Gaultney, 2013). There is limited information on the cost patterns of MM pts before and after their first relapse. A claims analysis was performed to evaluate the patterns of total direct costs of care, from Tx initiation until progression, for NDMM patients and for newly relapsed patients treated with novel agents, utilizing time to next therapy (TTNT) as a proxy measure for progression. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using a large US medical and pharmacy claims database, covering > 25 million lives annually. NDMM patients were identified with at least 2 outpatient claims or 1 inpatient medical claim associated with a diagnosis of MM (ICD-9-CM] code 203.0X), with the first such claim used to define the index date. Inclusion criteria required a minimum of 12 months' pre-index enrollment and 6 months' post-index continuous enrollment between 2006 and 2012. Pts with claims for stem cell transplantation (SCT) were excluded, to avoid confounding results from various factors based on timing, costs, and site of care of SCT. The analysis focused on NDMM and relapsed MM pts receiving lenalidomide (LEN)- or bortezomib (BORT)- based Tx, where complete claim history was available from Tx onset to initiation of subsequent Tx. Using methods similar to those described by Gaultney, patients' average monthly costs were determined, including medical (inpatient, ambulatory, and emergency room) and pharmacy (index and other drugs) costs, and total cost patterns over quarterly time periods were calculated. Average Charlson comorbidity scores were determined to compare baseline measures between pt groups. Results: 897 NDMM pts and 280 relapsed MM pts were identified with complete data through initiation of subsequent Tx. Monthly total direct costs for NDMM pts were $15,400 in the first 3 months (mos) of Tx, and declined each quarter, reaching approximately $5,000/mo at 18+ mos. At relapse, monthly costs increased to over $12,000 for the first 3 mos and followed a quarterly pattern of reduction similar to that seen for NDMM pts (Fig 1). Quarterly cost reduction patterns were consistent for patients treated with LEN or BORT for both NDMM and relapsed pts. Pts' total monthly NDMM costs over the full TTNT period averaged $8,942 with LEN vs. $11,139 for BORT (due to 54% higher monthly medical costs for BORT), while monthly drug costs were nearly identical (Table 1). The baseline Charlson comorbidity index was similar between Tx groups in both lines of Tx. Figure 1: Direct monthly costs (medical and pharmacy) for LEN- and BORT-based treatments Figure 1:. Direct monthly costs (medical and pharmacy) for LEN- and BORT-based treatments Table 1: Direct monthly costs for NDMM pts Table 1 Table 1. Conclusions: For a population of NDMM pts receiving either LEN- or BORT-based Tx without SCT, followed until TTNT, total direct monthly costs per pt declined steadily over time, decreasing by 68% from the initial quarter to the period post 18 mos. Costs spiked when pts began 2nd-line therapy, then followed a similar pattern of decline over time. This pattern may suggest that further extending the TTP for NDMM pts may also yield economic benefits for each month extended before relapse. Patterns of cost decline were similar between the LEN and BORT groups, for NDMM and for relapsed patients, although mean monthly total costs were lower for NDMM pts receiving LEN-based Tx due to lower medical costs and similar drug costs. Disclosures Arikian: Genesis Research: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients . Milentijevic:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Binder:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Monzini:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hu:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Nagarwala:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Hussein:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Corvino:Genesis Research LLC: Consultancy. Surinach:Genesis Research LLC: Consultancy. Usmani:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy; Array BioPharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.

Ublituximab (TG-1101), a Novel Glycoengineered Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination with Ibrutinib Is Highly Active in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory CLL and MCL; Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4679-4679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff P. Sharman ◽  
Charles M. Farber ◽  
Daruka Mahadevan ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
Heather D. Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Alkylating Agent ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Efficacy Assessment ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel, chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) which targets a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen and has been glycoengineered to enhance affinity for all variants of FcγRIIIa receptors, demonstrating greater antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity than rituximab and ofatumumab, particularly against cells that express low CD20 levels. Two Phase I trials of single agent UTX in relapsed/refractory CLL reported significant response rates with rapid and sustained lymphocyte depletion and a manageable safety profile. Ibrutinib, a novel oral BTK inhibitor approved for patients with previously treated CLL and MCL, displays high single agent activity and has reported increased activity in combination with non-glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAbs. Herein we report safety and efficacy data on the first combination of ibrutinib with a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, UTX, from an ongoing Phase 2 trial. Methods: Eligible patients have relapsed or refractory CLL/SLL or MCL with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. The study was designed to assess safety, tolerability, and early overall response rate, with an initial safety run-in period consisting of 6 patients followed by open enrollment. UTX (Cohorts of 600 and 900 mg for CLL and at 900 mg for MCL patients) is administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in Cycle 1 followed by Day 1 of Cycles 2 - 6. Ibrutinib is started on Day 1 and continues daily at 420 mg and 560 mg for CLL and MCL patients respectively. Following Cycle 6, patients come off study but remain on ibrutinib. Primary endpoint for safety: Adverse Events and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) during safety run-in. Phase II primary efficacy endpoint: ORR with an emphasis on early activity with response assessments by CT scan scheduled prior to cycles 3 and 6 only. Results: 40 patients (33 CLL/ 7 MCL) have been enrolled to date with enrollment continuing. 23 M/17 F, median age 72 yr (range 52-86), ECOG 0/1/2: 20/19/1, median prior Tx = 2 (range 1-6), 38% with ≥ 2 prior anti-CD20 therapies; prior purine analog = 43%; prior alkylating agent = 68%; and prior purine and alkylating agent = 43%. No DLTs were observed during the safety run-in. Gr 3/4 AE’s occurring in at least 5% of patients and at least possibly related to UTX and/or ibrutinib included: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, rash, leukocytosis, and infusion related reaction. There were no Grade 3/4 adverse events reported in ≥ 10% of patients. Ibrutinib was dose reduced due to an AE in 2 patients (1 diarrhea, 1 rash) and discontinued in 2 patients due to ibrutinib related AE’s (diarrhea and rash). IRR’s were managed with infusion interruptions with no patient requiring an ublituximab dose reduction. As of July 2014, 24/40 patients are evaluable for response. Best response to treatment is as follows: TableTypePts (n)CR (n)PR (n)SD (n)ORR (%)CLL non 17p/11q10-9190%17p/11q817-100%Total CLL18116194%MCL632183% The one CLL patient who achieved stable disease had a 46% nodal reduction. UTX appears to control ibrutinib related lymphocytosis with more than half of the patients within normal range for ALC by first efficacy assessment. Conclusions: Data suggests ublituximab, a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, in combination with ibrutinib is both well-tolerated and highly active in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL and MCL. ORR was 94% in patients with CLL (100% in patients with high risk CLL: 17p, 11q del with 1 CR), with responses attained rapidly (median TTR: 8 weeks). In MCL, 83% of patients achieved a response at first efficacy assessment, with 50% of patients achieving a CR by week 20. For most patients, responses improved by the second efficacy assessment. The addition of ublituximab appears to mitigate ibrutinib related lymphocytosis producing earlier clinical responses than historically seen with ibrutinib monotherapy. Efficacy and safety will be updated on all enrolled patients. Disclosures Sharman: TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Farber:Leukemia Lymphoma Society NJ Chapter: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Stock ownership Other. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Kolibaba:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Glaxo Smithkline: Research Funding. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Greenwald:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Ublituximab, a Novel Glycoengineered Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody (mAb), in Combination with TGR-1202, a Next Generation Once Daily PI3kδ Inhibitor, Demonstrates Activity in Heavily Pre-Treated and High-Risk Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and B-Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 801-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Lunning ◽  
Julie M. Vose ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
Nathan Fowler ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Richter's Transformation ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
11Q Deletion

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel chimeric mAb targeting a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen, glycoengineered to enhance affinity to FcγRIIIa receptors, thereby demonstrating significantly greater ADCC than rituximab. UTX monotherapy in patients (pts) with rituximab relapsed/refractory NHL and CLL has reported a 43% ORR (ASCO 2014). TGR-1202 is a next generation, once daily, oral PI3Kδ inhibitor which notably lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, and is active in pts with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies (EHA 2014). UTX and TGR-1202 have shown synergistic activity in-vitroin various lymphoid cell lines (Lugano 2013). This Phase 1 trial evaluates safety and efficacy of the combination of a glycoengineered anti-CD20 (UTX) and a PI3Kδ inhibitor (TGR-1202) in pts with heavily pre-treated relapsed or refractory CLL and NHL. Methods: Eligible pts have relapsed/refractory CLL or NHL with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. A 3+3 design evaluates cohorts of CLL and NHL pts independently with UTX dosed on Days 1, 8, 15 of Cycles 1 & 2 followed by maintenance therapy. UTX starts at 600 mg in Cohort 1 and increases to 900 mg for pts with CLL and is fixed at 900 mg for pts with NHL. TGR-1202 starts at 800 mg QD in Cohort 1 and is increased in subsequent cohorts. An amendment in July 2014 was introduced to include an improved micronized formulation of TGR-1202, starting at 400 mg once daily and increasing in subsequent cohorts. There are no limits on prior therapy, and patients with Richter’s Transformation or who are refractory to prior PI3Kδ inhibitors or BTK inhibitors are eligible. Primary endpoints: Safety and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints: Efficacy (ORR, CR rate). Results: As of August 2014, 21 pts have been enrolled: 8 CLL/SLL, 7 DLBCL, 5 Follicular Lymphoma, and 1 patient with Richter’s Transformation. Median age is 64 years (range 35-82); 12 male/9 female. Median prior Tx = 3 (range 1-9); median ECOG PS = 1. All pts are evaluable for safety. Adverse events have been manageable with no safety concerns noted. Day 1 infusion related reactions (IRR) were the most common treatment related adverse event (48%), with all but one event Grade 1 or 2 in severity, followed by neutropenia (38%), diarrhea (29%), and nausea (29%). Notably, no events of TGR-1202 related hepatotoxicity have been reported to date. All IRR and neutropenia events have been manageable with dose delays. One neutropenia related dose delay in a CLL patient at UTX 600 mg + TGR 800 mg met the criteria for a DLT, necessitating enrollment of additional pts into this cohort. No other DLTs have been reported, including at higher dose levels. Fifteen pts were evaluable for efficacy with 6 pts too early for response assessment. Among evaluable pts, 80% displayed a reduction in tumor burden at first efficacy assessment, despite pts exhibiting a number of high-risk characteristics, including 3/5 CLL pts having 17p/11q deletion and a median of 6 prior lines of therapy amongst pts with FL. Objective responses are summarized below: Table TypePts (n)PRn (%)ORRn (%)PD(n)% pts ≥ SD for 12 wksMedian Prior Rx CLL/SLL54 (80%)4 (80%)-5 (100%)2 (1 – 3) Richter’s1---1 (100%)1 FL4---4 (100%)6 (3 – 8) DLBCL52 (40%)2 (40%)14 (80%)3 (1 – 6) Total156 (40%)6 (40%)114 (93%)3 (1 – 8) Amongst pts with CLL, 2/2 pts with normal cytogenetics achieved a PR including a patient with prior treatment with a BTK inhibitor, while 2/3 pts with presence of 17p/11q deletion achieved a PR, with the remaining patient having SD with a 44% nodal reduction at first assessment. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggests the combination of UTX + TGR-1202 is well tolerated with early signs of clinical activity in heavily pre-treated and high-risk patient subsets. Enrollment is ongoing with at least 30 patients anticipated. Disclosures Lunning: Onyx: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Pauli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vakkalanka:Rhizen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Viswanadha:Incozen: Employment. O'Brien:Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Ublituximab (TG-1101), a Novel Glycoengineered Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination with Ibrutinib Is Highly Active in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma; Results of a Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3980-3980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Kolibaba ◽  
John M. Burke ◽  
Heather D. Brooks ◽  
Daruka Mahadevan ◽  
Jason Melear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel, chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) which targets a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen and has been glycoengineered to enhance affinity for all variants of FcγRIIIa receptors, demonstrating greater ADCC than rituximab and ofatumumab. In patients (pts) with rel/ref CLL, the combination of UTX with ibrutinib was well-tolerated and highly active demonstrating an 88% ORR (95% ORR in high-risk CLL) with responses attained rapidly (median time to iwCLL response of 8 weeks). Ibrutinib has demonstrated single agent activity in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), achieving a 68% ORR (21% CR) in a single arm trial in relapsed or refractory patients (Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Herein we report on the first combination of ibrutinib with a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, UTX, in patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). Methods: Eligible patients had rel/ref MCL with an ECOG PS < 3. Prior ibrutinib treatment was permitted. UTX (900 mg) was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in Cycle 1 followed by Day 1 of Cycles 2 - 6. Ibrutinib was started on Day 1 and continued daily at 560 mg. Following Cycle 6, patients came off study but could remain on ibrutinib. Primary endpoints were safety and ORR with an emphasis on early activity with response assessments by CT scan scheduled prior to cycles 3 and 6 only (criteria per Cheson 2007). Results: 15 patients were enrolled: 13 M/2 F, median age 71 yr (range 55-80), ECOG 0/1: 9/6, median prior Tx = 3 (range 1-8), 53% with ≥ 2 prior anti-CD20 therapies, 40% prior bortezomib. Gr 3/4 AE's occurring in at least 5% of patients and at least possibly related to UTX and/or ibrutinib included: neutropenia (13%), fatigue (7%), rash (7%) and atrial fibrillation (7%). Ibrutinib was dose reduced due to an AE in 1 patient (rash) and discontinued in 1 patient due to atrial fibrillation. No UTX dose reductions occurred. All 15 pts are evaluable for response with best response to treatment as follows: 87% (13/15) ORR with 33% (5/15) Complete Response. Three of the CR's occurred at week 8. Of the two patients not achieving an objective response, one patient was stable at first scan and came off treatment prior to second efficacy assessment (ibrutinib related A-Fib) and one patient progressed at first assessment. Responses generally improved from first to second assessment with median tumor reduction of 64% by week 8 and 82% by week 20. Conclusions: Ublituximab, a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, in combination with ibrutinib is both well-tolerated and highly active in pts with rel/ref MCL. Response rate, depth of response, and time to response compare favorably to historical data with ibrutinib alone. A randomized phase 3 trial with ibrutinib +/- ublituximab is currently ongoing in high-risk CLL pts and future studies using this combination in MCL are being evaluated. Disclosures Kolibaba: Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Burke:Gilead: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel expenses. Farber:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Fanning:Celgene and Millennium/Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Boccia:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharman:Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Calistoga: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long-Term Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study of Idelalisib (ZYDELIG®) in Combination with Anti-CD20 Antibodies (Rituximab [R] or Ofatumumab [O]) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5653-5653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Sven de Vos ◽  
Jacqueline C. Barrientos ◽  
Marshall T. Schreeder ◽  
Ian W. Flinn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Extension Study ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Tp53 Mutations ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Anti Cd20 ◽  
Cd20 Antibodies

Abstract Introduction: PI3Kδ signaling is critical for the proliferation, survival and homing/tissue retention of malignant B cells. Idelalisib is a first-in-class, highly selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ recently approved for the treatment of relapsed CLL in combination with R. This report summarizes the long-term follow-up of the Phase 1 combination experience of idelalisib with anti-CD20 antibodies. Methods: This Phase 1 study evaluated idelalisib for relapsed/refractory CLL continuously given at 100 mg BID (4 of the pts receiving R) or 150 mg BID (all other pts) in combination with a total of 8 infusions of rituximab (R, 375 mg/m2 weekly x 8), or a total of 12 infusions of ofatumumab (O, 300mg initial dose either on Day 1 or Day 2 relative to the first dose of idelalisib, then 1,000 mg weekly x 7, then 1,000 mg every 4 wks x 4). Pts on treatment after 48 weeks were eligible to continue idelalisib on an extension study. Clinical response was evaluated according to published criteria (Hallek 2008; Cheson 2012). Results: 40 pts (12F/28M) with a median (range) age of 66 (43-87) years and a WHO performance status of 0 (24, 60%) or 1 (16, 40%) were enrolled. 19 pts received idelalisib in combination with R and 21 with O. Adverse disease characteristics (n, %) included Rai Stage III/IV (20, 50%), bulky lymphadenopathy (23, 58%), refractory disease (15, 38%), multiple prior therapies (median 2, range: 1-9). Almost all pts (39, 98%) had at least 1 prior therapy containing R, and 3 of the 21 pts (14%) receiving idelalisib + O had received prior O. 63% of the pts receiving idelalisib + R, and 48% of the pts receiving idelalisib + O were refractory to R. Prior therapies also included alkylating agents (31, 78%, [bendamustine: 20, 50%]) and purine analogs (31, 78%, [fludarabine: 28, 70%]). Data available from 39 pts showed that 11 (28%) pts had evidence of del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations and 30 (75%) had unmutated IGHV. As of 7/15/2014, the median (range) treatment duration was 18 (0-44) months. 23 (58%) pts have completed the primary study and enrolled into the extension study. Primary reasons for study discontinuation (as reported by investigators) included disease progression (14, 35%), adverse events (AEs) (12, 30%), investigator request (3, 8%), withdrawal of consent (n=1), BMT (n=1). There were a total of 8 deaths on study: 2 deaths occurred after disease progression, and 6 pts died because of AEs (all assessed as unrelated/unlikely related to idelalisib by investigators). A total of 4 pts (10%) were continuing idelalisib treatment on the extension study at time of analysis. Selected treatment-emergent AEs (any Grade/≥Gr 3, regardless of causality) included diarrhea/colitis (55%/23%), cough (40%/3%), pyrexia (40%/3%), dyspnea (30%/3%), fatigue (25%/0%) nausea (25%/0%), rash (20%/0%), pneumonia (20%/18%), and pneumonitis (8%/5%). Elevation of liver transaminases (TA, any Grade/≥Gr 3) was seen in 30%/10%. Re-exposure to idelalisib after resolution of TA elevation generally was successful; only 1 patient discontinued the study because of (recurrent) TA elevation. Other AEs leading to study discontinuation and reported as possibly/probably related to idelalisib included diarrhea/colitis (4, 10%), pyrexia (n=1), interstitial lung disease (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), rash (n=1), psoriasis (n=1). Secondary malignancies leading to discontinuation (all reported as unrelated) were breast cancer (n=1), recurrent colon cancer (n=1), AML (n=1). There was no obvious overall difference in the toxicity reported for pts receiving idelalisib with rituximab compared to those with ofatumumab. The ORR (N=40) was 83% (33/40), with 2 CRs (5%) reported. Median PFS (N=40) and duration of response (DOR) (n=33) were 24 months. Median (range) time to response was 1.9 (range 1.7-16.9) months. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached with a KM estimate for OS of 80% at 24 months. For the 11 pts with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations, the response rate was 73%, and the median PFS and DOR were 20 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: Combinations of idelalisib with anti-CD20 antibodies such as R or O represent non-cytotoxic regimens with acceptable safety profiles and considerable activity resulting in durable tumor control in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL, including those with high risk factors such as del(17p) or TP53 mutations. A Phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy of idelalisib in combination with ofatumumab is ongoing (NCT01659021). Disclosures Furman: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schreeder:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Sharman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boyd:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Fowler:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Leonard:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Rai:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Viggiano:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jahn:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Coutre:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

scholarly journals First in Human Study with GSK2857916, an Antibody Drug Conjugated to Microtubule-Disrupting Agent Directed Against B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results from Study BMA117159 Part 1 Dose Escalation

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1148-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam D. Cohen ◽  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Suzanne Trudel ◽  
Paul G Richardson ◽  
Ed N. Libby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Surface Receptor ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Ocular Toxicity ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Background Expression of BCMA, a cell surface receptor in the TNF superfamily, is restricted to B cells at later stages of differentiation and is requisite for the survival of long lived plasma cells. BCMA is expressed on MM cells at variable levels. GSK2857916 is a humanized IgG1 anti-BCMA antibody conjugated to the microtubule disrupting agent monomethyl auristatin-F via a stable, protease-resistant maleimidocaproyl linker. Upon binding to BCMA, GSK2857916 is rapidly internalized and active drug is released within the cell. GSK2857916 also exhibits enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity resulting from afucosylation of the FC domain which increases affinity to FCγRIIIa expressed on immune effector cells. The rationale for investigating GSK2857916 in MM is supported by the restricted pattern of BCMA expression and by evidence from preclinical studies. Methods BMA117159 (NCT02064387) is a Phase I open-label study investigating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), antidrug antibodies (ADA) and clinical activity of GSK2857916 in relapsed/refractory MM and other hematologic malignancies expressing BCMA. Dose escalation (Part 1) is conducted exclusively in MM patients; primary objective is safety, determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose. GSK2857916 is administered every 3 weeks as a1 hr intravenous infusion with no mandatory prophylaxis for infusion related reactions (IRR). Bayesian Logistic Regression Model is applied for dose recommendations. Eligible MM patients must have prior treatments with alkylators, proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators and stem cell transplantation, if transplant eligible, and have documented disease progression on or within 60 days of last therapy. Additional key inclusion criteria include: ANC >1x109/L; hemoglobin >8 g/dL; PLT >50x109/L; INR <1.5; PTT <1.5xULN; total bilirubin ≤1.25xULN; AST and ALT <1.5xULN; serum creatinine <1.2xULN or calculated creatinine clearance >60 mL/min; albuminuria <500mg/24hr; LVEF >50% and troponin <1xULN. Patients remain on treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or completing 16 treatment cycles. Blood is collected for PK and ADA analyses; blood and bone marrow aspirates are collected for PD analyses. Results To date 24 MM patients have enrolled and completed the 21 day DLT observation period. Patients were enrolled at the following 8 dose levels: 0.03 (n=1); 0.06 (n=1); 0.12 (n=4); 0.24 (n=4); 0.48 (n=4); 0.96 (n=3); 1.92 (n=4), and 3.4 mg/kg (n=3). The median age is 60 years (range 39-71); 50% are male. Eighty-three percent received ≥4 prior lines. Sixty-three percent had IgG and 29% had IgA types. Seven patients (29%) had adverse cytogenetics defined as del17p13, or t(4;14) . Overall, 23 patients (96%) experienced adverse events (AE); the most frequent (≥20%) regardless of cause were nausea (42%), fatigue (38%), anemia (29%), chills (29%), pyrexia (29%), thrombocytopenia (29%), dry eye (21%), and hypercalcemia (21%). Grade 3/4 AEs reported in ≥10% of patients were thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. Eight serious AEs were reported in 6 patients with 1 event of limbal stem cell dysfunction considered drug related; this event has not resolved. There were no AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. Four patients required dose reduction due to AEs: ocular toxicity (n=1), corneal disorder/ocular toxicity (n=1), dry eyes (n=1), and keratitis (n=1). IRRs (all Grade 1 or 2) were reported in 7 patients (29%) across dose levels and occurred with the first dose administration. The most frequent symptoms were chills. No DLTs were reported. Sixteen patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression (n=14), patient decision (n=1), completing 16 cycles of scheduled treatment (n=1); 8 patients are ongoing. There was1 MR at 0.24 mg/kg, and 1 VGPR, 3 PR, and1 MR at doses ≥0.96 mg/kg; resulting in a clinical benefit rate of 25% (unconfirmed responses). Conclusion GSK2857916 was well tolerated with no DLTs up to 3.4mg/kg q3w; MTD was not reached. AEs were manageable with ocular toxicity emerging as the most frequent reason for dose modifications. Clinical activity has been seen at higher doses. Complete safety, ADA, PD, and clinical activity data from all dose levels evaluated in Part 1 for q3w schedule will be presented. Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline; drug linker technology is licensed from Seattle Genetics Disclosures Cohen: Janssen: Consultancy; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Trudel:Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Equity Ownership, Honoraria; Oncoethix: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Takeda: Speakers Bureau; AMGEN/Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Celegene: Speakers Bureau. DeWall:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ellis:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. He:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mazumdar:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Opalinska:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Voorhees:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene, BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document