scholarly journals Phase 2 multicenter trial of ofatumumab and prednisone as initial therapy of chronic graft-vs-host disease

Author(s):  
Aleksandr Lazaryan ◽  
Stephanie J Lee ◽  
Mukta Arora ◽  
Jongphil Kim ◽  
Brian C Betts ◽  
...  

Standard initial therapy of chronic graft vs. host disease (cGVHD) with glucocorticoids results in suboptimal and transient responses in a significant number of patients. Safety and feasibility of anti-CD20 directed B-cell therapy with ofatumumab (1000 mg IV on days 0 and 14) and prednisone (1 mg/kg/day) was previously established in our phase I trial (n=12). We now report the mature results of the phase II expansion of the trial (n=38). The overall NIH severity of cGVHD was moderate (63%) or severe (37%) with 74% of all patients affected by the overlap subtype of cGVHD and 82% by prior acute cGVHD. The combined therapy was generally well tolerated, with some anticipated infusion reactions to ofatumumab, and common toxicities of glucocorticoids. Total B-cell depletion following therapy was profound, with marginal recovery within first 12 months from initial therapy. The observed 6 month clinician-reported and 2014 NIH-defined overall response rates (ORR=complete + partial response[CR/PR]) of 62.5% (1-sided lower 90% confidence interval=51.5%) were not superior to pre-specified historic benchmark of 60%. Post-hoc comparison of 6 month NIH response suggested benefit compared to more contemporaneous NIH-based benchmark of 48.6% with frontline sirolimus/prednisone (CTN 0801 trial). Baseline cGVHD features (organ involvement, severity, initial IS agents) were not significantly associated with 6-month ORR. The median time to initiation of second-line therapy was 5.4 months (range 0.9-15.1 months). Failure-free survival (FFS) was 64.2% (95% CI 46.5-77.4%) at 6 months and 53.1% (95% CI 35.8-67.7%) at 12 months, whereas FFS with CR/PR at 12 months of 33.5% exceeded a benchmark of 15% in post-hoc analysis, and was associated with greater success in steroid discontinuation by 24 months (odds ratio 8 (95% CI 1.21-52.7). This single-arm phase II trial demonstrated acceptable safety and potential efficacy of the upfront use of ofatumumab in combination with prednisone in cGVHD. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01680965.

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 854-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin M. Alousi ◽  
Roland Bassett ◽  
Julianne Chen ◽  
Bethany J Overman ◽  
Chitra M. Hosing ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute Graft-vs.-Host Disease (aGVHD) is the major cause of mortality and morbidity following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). Steroids are the standard initial therapy yet only ~50-60% will achieve a response. Strategies to improve response and minimize steroid-exposure are needed. We report the results of a randomized trial of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) plus steroids vs. steroids- alone as initial therapy for aGVHD. Methods: This was a Phase II, randomized, adaptive Bayesian design. Patients with histologically confirmed aGVHD and who received <72 hours of steroids were randomized to receive 2mg/kg methylprednisolone (MP) with or without ECP. ECP schedule was: days 1-14 (8 sessions), days 15-28 (6 sessions) and days 29-56 (8 sessions). The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 56 post-randomization defined as being alive, in remission, achieving a GVHD response without additional therapy, and on < 1mg/kg of MP at day 28 and < 0.5mg/kg on day 56. Randomization probabilities were based upon the probabilities of response in each arm, stratified by skin-only vs. visceral involvement. The primary endpoint was evaluated using a Bayesian predictive probability approach; i.e., at the end of the study, if the posterior probability that the success rate for either arm was greater than that for the other arm was > 0.80, that arm would be declared the preferred treatment. Pts and Results: Between 2008 and 2014 eighty-one (81) pts were randomized to ECP + MP (51 pts) or MP-alone (30 pts). Median age was 54 yrs (range, 17-75); 42% had AML/MDS and 62% were male. HCT was performed with myeloablative conditioning in 69% and 63% had an unrelated donor. At enrollment, 90% of patients had aGVHD grade II, 10% had grade III/IV. Organ Involvement was: skin (86%), upper GI (22%), lower GI (22%) and liver (10%). The treatment arms were balanced for all baseline characteristics. The probability that ECP+MP had a higher success rate than MP-alone was 0.815 which exceeded the protocol-specified threshold of 80%, declaring ECP-arm the preferred treatment. The ECP-arm was more beneficial in pts with skin-only aGVHD (72% vs. 57% response rate) whereas visceral-organ involvement response rates were similar (47% vs. 43%). By day 56, 43% of the evaluable patients randomized to the ECP were on physiologic doses of steroids (≤0.1mg/kg) versus 30% for MP-alone arm (p=0.34). To study the immunologic effects of ECP, we examined the recovery of T-cell subsets by multi-parameter flow cytometry in a subset of pts randomized to the ECP+MP and MP-alone arm at enrollment and study conclusion. ECP+MP was associated with more robust recovery of CD4+ and CD8+ cells and significantly higher absolute number of regulatory T-cells (p=0.043), figure 1. Conclusions: The results of this randomized, phase II trial indicate that the addition of ECP to steroids results in higher GVHD response and facilitates steroid-tapering in pts with newly diagnosed aGVHD. This combination appears most efficacious for pts with skin-involvement. Correlative studies implicate expansion of regulatory T-cells as a possible mechanism of action through which ECP exerts its immunologic effect. Figure 1. Patient Characteristics and Outcomes Figure 1. Patient Characteristics and Outcomes Figure 2. Mean Absolute Regulatory T-cell Count in subset of patients randomized to ECP+MP (red) vs. MP-alone (green) p-value= 0.043. Figure 2. Mean Absolute Regulatory T-cell Count in subset of patients randomized to ECP+MP (red) vs. MP-alone (green) p-value= 0.043. Disclosures Alousi: Therakos, Inc: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Extracorporeal Photopheresis is FDA approved for the treatment of cutaneous lymphoma. It is commonly used in the treatment of patients with acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. There are no FDA approved therapies for this indication and all therapies are given as an "off-label" indication..


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. S28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Pidala ◽  
Vijaya Raj Bhatt ◽  
Betty K. Hamilton ◽  
Iskra Pusic ◽  
William A. Wood ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3701-3701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Furman ◽  
Herbert Eradat ◽  
Christine Gabriella DiRienzo ◽  
Suzanne R Hayman ◽  
Craig C. Hofmeister ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3701 Background: Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is an indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) characterized by production of a monoclonal IgM paraprotein and variable CD20 expression due to the downregulation of CD20 as B cells differentiate into plasma cells. Rituximab monotherapy (R) achieves an overall response rate (ORR) of 25–50% in therapy naïve and relapsed WM and is associated with IgM flares in 25–75% of patients (pts) that potentially lead to hyperviscosity due to a rapid rise in IgM. Ofatumumab (OFA) is a fully human monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody approved for the treatment of fludarabine and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has demonstrated activity in indolent B-NHL. Since OFA is active in CLL, with its low CD20 expression, we initiated a phase II single-arm trial of OFA in pts with WM. We report primary endpoint data from this study. Methods: Pts (age ≥ 18 years) with WM requiring therapy by 2nd International Workshop on WM (IWWM) criteria were eligible. Cycle 1 (C1) of therapy consisted of OFA 300 mg week 1 and 1000 mg weeks 2–4 (Treatment Group A [TGA]) or OFA 300 mg week 1 and 2000 mg weeks 2–5 (TGB). Premedication included acetaminophen and antihistamine (all infusions) and glucocorticoid (infusions 1 and 2). Pts with grade 3–4 infusion-related adverse events (AEs) during weeks 1 and 2 also received glucocorticoid during weeks 3–5. Pts with stable disease (SD) or a minor response (MR) at week 16 of cycle 1 were eligible to receive a re-dosing cycle (C2) consisting of OFA 300 mg week 1 and 2000 mg weeks 2–5. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed by 3rd IWWM criteria. Toxicity was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE, v 3.0. Results: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled between March 2009 and February 2011. Median age was 63 years (range 43–85); 22 pts were male. Median IgM level was 3.11 g/dL (range 0.81–8.64); median hemoglobin (hgb) was 9.8 g/dL (range 5.3–13.2). Nine pts were treatment naïve; 28 pts had received a median of 3 prior therapies (range 1–5) including R (25 pts) and purine analog (14 pts). The first 15 pts were enrolled in TGA and the next 22 pts in TGB; pt characteristics were similar in both groups. Thirty-four pts completed C1; 1 pt withdrew after 1 dose and 2 pts received only 3 doses due to serious AEs (SAEs). Eleven pts achieved partial response (PR) and 7 achieved MR after C1 (ORR=49%; 95% CI [32%, 66%]). Twelve pts received C2, after which 4 pts improved their response (1 MR to PR, 1 SD to PR, 2 SD to MR) and 1 nonevaluable pt attained MR. After C1 and C2, the ORR was 59% (13 PR, 9 MR; 95% CI [42%, 75%]). Responses were seen in 67% (6/9) of therapy naïve pts, 57% (16/28) of relapsed pts, 52% (13/25) of pts who had prior R, 75% (9/12) of R-naïve pts, 64% (16/25) of pts with IgM < 4 g/dL and 50% (6/12) of pts with IgM ≥ 4 g/dL. ORR was 47% (7/15) in TGA and 68% (15/22) in TGB. ORR in TGA was negatively affected by prior R exposure and IgM ≥ 4 g/dL, whereas ORR in TGB was not affected by prior therapy, prior R or IgM level. Fifteen of 26 (58%) pts with hgb < 11.0 g/dL experienced ≥ 3.0 g/dL increase in hgb (range 3.0–7.1). Infusion-related events occurred with dose 1 in 30 (81%) pts and with dose 2 in 21 (57%) pts; all infusion events were grade 1–2 except 4 grade 3 events (1 rash, 1 chest pain, 1 chest discomfort, 1 back pain). Fifteen pts developed 22 infections including 8 upper respiratory tract, 4 urinary tract (UTI) and 4 sinus infections; all infections were grade 1–2 except 1 grade 3 UTI. One pt developed grade 3 febrile neutropenia. In total, there were 14 grade 3–4 AEs (all grade 3). Five pts developed 8 SAEs possibly related to OFA. One pt withdrew due to grade 3 hemolytic anemia. Two pts with baseline IgM of 6.63 and 4.75 g/dL required plasmapheresis for grade 3 renal insufficiency and hyperviscosity symptoms, respectively, with resolution of symptoms and were able to complete C1. Two pts developed IgM flare, defined as > 25% rise in IgM followed by subsequent MR or PR. Conclusions: OFA is clinically active in pts with WM, with an acceptable toxicity profile and a lower incidence (5%) of IgM flare. The ORR to OFA was 59% (TGA 47%, TGB 68%) including a 50% ORR (TGA 17%, TGB 83%) in pts with IgM ≥ 4.0 g/dL. Pts' anemia responded to OFA with 58% of pts with baseline hgb < 11.0 g/dL experiencing ≥ 3.0 g/dL increase in hgb. TGB achieved ORR > 60% in all pt groups regardless of prior therapy or baseline IgM level. A higher dose of OFA appeared to be more effective in pts previously exposed to R or with baseline IgM ≥ 4.0 g/dL. Further study of OFA in WM is warranted. Disclosures: Furman: Genentech: Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau. Off Label Use: • Ofatumumab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of fludarabine- and alemtuzumab-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and is currently under development for the treatment of B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Waldenstroms macroglobulinemia and follicular lymphoma), as well as autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis). Eradat:Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Genentech, A Roche Company: Speakers Bureau. DiRienzo:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Leonard:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy. Advani:GSK: Research Funding. Switzky:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Liao:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Shah:GSK: Employment. Lisby:Genmab A/S: Employment. Lin:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13007-13007 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Hohloch ◽  
G. Wulf ◽  
W. Jung ◽  
E. Stitz ◽  
J. Meller ◽  
...  

13007 Background: Radioimmunotherapy has been shown to be effective in CD20 + B-cell lymphomas. Both non-myeloablative as well as myeloablative regimens have been employed for low grade and high grade lymphomas with impressive response rates and remission durations. Recently, the Press group and our group published data on myeloablative 131-I-anti-CD20 RAIT with high response rates and favourable long term survival especially in follicular lymphomas and transformed FL. Therefore, a phase II study is currently being done within the German Radioimmunotherapy Group, interim analysis data are presented. Methods: Patients were to receive R-Dexa-BEAM, followed by BEAM and HD-RAIT 2–6 months after BEAM. 131-I-Rituximab was administered with a maximum kidney and lung dose of 25 Gy. Sample size was calculated to be 16 to evaluate toxicity and feasibility of the tandem approach as primary endpoint. Results: 16 pts with relapsed (14) or primary refractory (2) B-cell lymphomas (FLI,II: 4pts; DLBCL: 4pts (all early relapses); transformed FL: 6 pts; MCL:1 pt, marginal zone lymphoma: 1 pt) were treated with 1 (15 pts) or 2 cycles (1 pt) of R-Dexa-BEAM. 13/16 pts achieving PR (5) or CRu (8) were treated with BEAM, 2 pts with PD and 1 with subdural hematoma were drop outs. After BEAM, 9/13 pts were in CR, 3/13 PR, 1/13 PD. Of 12 responding pts, 6 received HD-RAIT (1 pancytopenia, 1 hepatic, 2 pulmonary toxicity, 3 too early). After HD RAIT, 5/6 pts were in CR, 1 in PR. 4/6 pts (3 CR, 1 PR) are alive for 22–31 months, 2 pts died in CR, 1 of interstitial lung disease 2 months after HD-RAIT, 1 pt of pneumonia 8 months after HD-RAIT. Conclusions: Myeloablative RAIT is a feasible and effective treatment modality for relapsed poor prognosis CD20+ B-NHL not having severe toxicity due to the salvage regimen and HD-chemotherapy. HD RAIT offers the potential for long term relapse free survival. Final analysis of toxicity and outcome of this phase II study will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1503-1503
Author(s):  
Holger Schulz ◽  
Sven Trelle ◽  
Marcel Reiser ◽  
Marcus Sieber ◽  
Volker Diehl ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: LPHD is a rare disease which accounts for 3–8% of all Hodgkin cases. Patients with LPHD relapse frequently and freedom from treatment failure is not significantly improved by intensification of polychemotherapy or radiotherapy. The malignant cells of LPHD are CD20+ and therefore the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (R) may have activity with fewer adverse late effects. Methods: This phase-II trial was initiated by the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG) to evaluate rituximab in patients with LPHD at first or higher relapse or progressive disease after at least one standard treatment. Histological slides were reviewed by a reference panel. Pts received 375mg/m2 of the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab once weekly for four weeks given as intravenous infusion in saline solution. Results: Between 1999 and 2004 we treated twenty-one pts. with CD20-positive Hodgkin’s lymphoma according to the study protocol. Fourteen patients had stage I/II disease at the time of study entry and all patients were in their first to third relapse (median 2). The initial diagnosis of LPHD was confirmed in 17/21 cases. The remaining cases were reclassified as HD transformed to T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma (2) or CD20-positive classical HD (2). The overall response rate was 90%. Time to progression was 31 months (ms). The median follow-up 58 ms. Both T-cell rich B-cell lymphoma are in continous remission (PR 51ms+, CR 61ms+). Conclusion: Single-agent therapy with rituximab is safe and showed high efficacy in relapsed LPHD. Therefore rituximab might be a non-toxic and efficient alternative treatment strategy compared to intensified chemo-and/or radiotherapeutic protocols in this young group of patients.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5567-5567
Author(s):  
Marlies E.H.M. Van Hoef

Abstract Introduction: Chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) occurs in 30–50% of adults transplanted by non-myeloablative (reduced intensity conditioning) allogeneic transplant, whereas it is rare in children. The syndrome complex manifests itselves as auto-immune disease. Dysregulation of B-cell function has also been reported in auto-immune diseases. This is a rationale for B-cell depletion. We considered that B-cell depletion might have a therapeutic effect in cGVHD and reduce the risks associated with cGVHD. Based on these assumptions we applied risk reduction principles and defined a plan for cure of cGVHD. Methods: To identify the risks associated with B-cell depletion in cGVHD we performed a medline search on anti-CD20 or B-cell depletion or rituximab and cGVHD. The publications were analyzed and those applicable to the topic evaluated. Clinical research methods were applied to define a plan for risk reduction of cGVHD. Results: The medline search revealed that rituximab was used for B-cell depletion in cGVHD and in auto-immune diseases. In advanced cGVHD complete and partial remissions of a variety of manifestations of cGVHD were reported. Complete remissions could also be induced early during the disease course of single manifestations of cGVHD not responsive to immune suppressive treatment or as initial treatment. The dose of rituximab varied from 1 to 4 weekly courses of rituximab 375 mg/m2, with repetitions of this schedule in advanced disease to induce complete response. During reported follow-up responding manifestations did not recur. Rituximab treatment was well tolerated with appropriate anti-allergic prophylaxis. The results support the concept that anti-CD20 treatment might cure cGVHD manifestations at first diagnosis; it is too early to define whether it also serves as prophylactic for development of new manifestations. The observations were discussed with the company marketing rituximab and a study plan was designed. This study plan is being discussed with study centers for risk reduction of cGVHD by rituximab. The risk reduction plan will be presented


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Fields ◽  
William Townsend ◽  
Andrew Webb ◽  
Nicholas Counsell ◽  
Christopher Pocock ◽  
...  

Purpose The treatment of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with cardiac comorbidity is problematic, because this group may not be able to receive anthracycline-containing chemoimmunotherapy. We designed a single-arm phase II multicenter trial of rituximab, gemcitabine, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-GCVP) in patients considered unfit for anthracycline-containing chemoimmunotherapy because of cardiac comorbidity. Patients and Methods Sixty-one of 62 patients received R-GCVP, administered on day 1 with gemcitabine repeated on day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Median age was 76.5 years. All patients had advanced disease; 27 (43.5%) had left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 50%, and 35 (56.5%) had borderline ejection fraction of > 50% and comorbid cardiac risk factors such as ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, or hypertension. Primary end point was overall response rate at the end of treatment. Results Thirty-eight patients (61.3%; 95% CI, 49.2 to 73.4) achieved disease response (complete response [CR], n = 18; undocumented/unconfirmed CR, n = 6; partial response, n = 14). Two-year progression-free survival for all patients was 49.8% (95% CI, 37.3 to 62.3), and 2-year overall survival was 55.8% (95% CI, 43.3 to 68.4). Thirty-four patients experienced grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity. There were 15 cardiac events, of which seven were grade 1 to 2, five were grade 3 to 4, and three were fatal, reflecting the poor cardiac status of the study population. Conclusion Our phase II multicenter trial showed that the R-GCVP regimen is an active, reasonably well-tolerated treatment for patients with DLBCL for whom anthracycline-containing immunochemotherapy was considered unsuitable because of coexisting cardiac disease.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 3977-3977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delvyn C. Case ◽  
Jacquelyn A. Hedlund ◽  
Kurt S. Ebrahim ◽  
Marjorie A. Boyd

Abstract ITP in adults is an autoimmune disease characterized by antibody-mediated thrombocytopenia. A significant number of patients relapse after initial therapy with prednisone and splenectomy when necessary, and require other therapy for continuing thrombocytopenia. Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody has been utilized in ITP refractory to other modes of treatment (Feurestein, M., et al. The use of Rituximab in 28 patients with immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Onc.22:187, 2003). We report on the long-term responses possible in ITP treated with Rituximab. Twenty-two patients with ITP refractory to initial conventional therapies with platelet counts &lt;30,000/ul were treated with Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV weekly x4. Responses were characterized as partial response (PR; platelets &gt;50,000/ul but &lt;150,000/ul) and complete response (platelets &gt;150,000/ul). Patient characteristics included 5 males and 17 females with ages 24–83 years (median 58). Twenty had undergone splenectomy. Thirteen patients (59%) responded to Rituximab. Six responses were PR with durations lasting 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, and 6 months. Continuing Rituximab monthly after initial therapy of 4 weeks did not produce improved platelet counts in patients who failed Rituximab or who achieved PR. Seven responses were CR with durations of 12, 20+, 25+, 29+, 38+, 40+, and 48+ months. The one patient who relapsed at 12 months was retreated with Rituximab but did not respond. There was no correlation between response and age, sex, or duration of ITP. Neither of the patients who declined prior splenectomy responded. There were no serious complications of Rituximab infusions. Twenty-five percent of patients had mild first infusion reactions. Rituximab can produce long-term CR in 27% of patients with ITP refractory to initial therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document