scholarly journals Real World Data on CAR T-Cell Recipients: Are We There Yet?

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel-Angel Perales ◽  
Marcelo C. Pasquini
Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 569-569
Author(s):  
Kelly Kenzik ◽  
P. Connor Johnson ◽  
Smita Bhatia

Abstract Introduction: As a newly approved third line therapy for hematologic malignancies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy can provide patients with a life-saving therapeutic option. CAR T-cell therapy carries risks of toxicities and potentially intensive health care use. However, given its relatively recent approval (approved in 2017), there is limited real world data on healthcare utilization after CAR-T cell infusion. We examined hospitalizations and ED visits for the first 12 mo after CAR-T cell infusion. Methods: We used Truven Health MarketScan database (one of the largest private health insurance claims datasets in the US) to identify commercially insured patients who received CAR-T cell infusion between Jan 2017 and Dec 2019 at age <65y. CAR-T cell therapy was identified using ICD-10 codes (Q2042, Q2041, 0540T, XW033C3, XW043C3) and national drug codes for axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel. Patients were followed for hospitalizations and/or ED visits from CAR-T cell infusion to death, loss of coverage, 12 mo or 12/31/2019 (end of available data), whichever came first. The cumulative incidence of first hospitalization from CAR-T cell therapy was calculated using competing risks method. We also examined cumulative cause-specific hospitalizations per person-month at 30d, 31-90d, and >90d from infusion. Total number of ED visits and reasons for ED visits were examined by primary disease and by time from CAR-T cell infusion. Results: Overall, 204 patients (66% male) received CAR-T cell infusions (96% tisagenlecleucel) over the 3y period; median age at 1 st infusion was 55y (range 1-64). Cancer diagnoses included diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 62.8%), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL, 12.3%), multiple myeloma (MM, 9.3%), other (15.6%). Median follow-up from CAR-T cell infusion was 3.2 mo (0-12); 11% were followed for all 12 mo. Hospitalizations: Ninety-one patients (44%) had 191 hospitalizations within 12 mo of CAR-T infusion (n=1: 47%, n=2: 24%, n >2: 28.5%); 16% of all CLL patients 12% of all DLBCL and 11% of all MM patients had >2 hospitalizations. Most prevalent reasons for hospitalization included infection (n=79; 41.3% of hospitalizations), myelosuppression (n=38; 19.9%), and management of underlying malignancy (n=35; 18.3%). The average length of stay per hospitalization was highest for infection (13.5d), followed by management of underlying malignancy (8.3d), and myelosuppression (5.9d). The cumulative incidence at 12 mo for cause-specific hospitalizations included: infection (22.2%), myelosuppression (11.9%), and managing malignancy (9.8%) (Fig 1). Overall, this cohort experienced 0.2 hospitalizations/person-mo. The majority of these hospitalizations occurred within the 1 st mo following CAR-T cell therapy (0.6/person-mo), declining to 0.11/person-mo at 31-90d, and to 0.04/person-mo at >90d (Fig 2). Infection and myelosuppression remained the most common reasons for hospitalizations across the three time periods. There were no statistically significant factors predicting hospitalization in multivariable models. ED visits: Fifty patients (25%) had 71 ED visits after CAR-T cell infusion (n=1: 76%; n=2: 14%; n>2: 10%). Reasons for ED visits included infections (n=14, 19.7%), myelosuppression (n=11, 15.5%), and cardiac emergencies (n=6, 8.5%). Median time to ED was 107d (range 8-355d). Nine ED visits occurred within the 1 st mo after CAR-T cell infusion (infection, epigastric/chest pain, thrombosis/hemorrhage [n=2 each], neutropenia, altered mental status, primary disease [n=1 each]). Conclusion: Real world data show that over the first 12 mo. after CAR-T cell therapy, 44% of the patients are re-hospitalized one or more times and 25% are seen in the emergency room. Infection is the most common reason for unplanned visits (hospitalizations or ED visits), followed by myelosuppression. The probability of these hospitalizations is highest within the first month, declining rapidly thereafter. These findings can be used to inform management strategies to mitigate unplanned healthcare utilization. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 301-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thieblemont ◽  
S. Le Gouill ◽  
R. Di Blasi ◽  
G. Cartron ◽  
F. Morschhauser ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19573-e19573
Author(s):  
Lincy S. Lal ◽  
Cori Blauer-Peterson ◽  
Stacey DaCosta Byfield ◽  
Jennifer Malin

e19573 Background: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cell products are considered gene treatments, producing long term results, with just one infusion. Real world evidence on the two available CAR T cell products, tisagenlecleucel (T) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (AC) are limited in leukemia and lymphoma patients, specifically at the individual product level. This study presents treatment outcomes and resource utilization of these products from a payer perspective. Methods: Patients with evidence of CAR T administration per claims algorithm and from documentation from a prior authorization program from January 1, 2017 to May 30, 2020 were included; the CAR T administration was the index event. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for the CART T administration and pre and post CAR T administration for a fixed 6-month period, and previous treatments were captured and presented by product, using descriptive analytics. Results: The study population included 148 patients, mean age (SD): 57.4 (16.9), with 34% female, and 64% Commercial patients versus 36% Medicare patients, with a mean follow-up of 319 days (SD: 210). There were 15 leukemia patients, 119 lymphoma patients, and 14 patients with other indication in the study population; 71(48%) had evidence of being on a clinical trial during the study. The mean Charleson Comorbidity score at baseline was 3.9. Major comorbidities included anemia (71%), diseases of the heart (72%). 29(20%) patients were treated with T of which 24% were for leukemia and 76% for lymphoma and 67 (46%) were treated with AC of which 100% were for lymphoma, and 52 (35%) patients did not differentiate between products. Majority of the CAR T administration took place inpatient (84%). Baseline 6-month HCRU was 52% ER visits and 59% hospitalizations, compared to post 6-month utilization at 45% ER visits and 49% hospitalizations for the total population. 118 (80%) patients had evidence of prior treatment indicating that the CAR T was at least in the second line setting or higher. The most common priming chemotherapy was cyclophosphamide-fludarabine in 69 (47%) patients. Of the total population, 72% did not have any evidence of further treatment in the available follow-up time, specifically, 47% in the leukemia and 76% in the lymphoma populations, respectively. Conclusions: Majority of patients have evidence of prior treatments before the CAR T index date, indicating relapse. There is evidence of decrease in the HCRU subsequent to treatment, compared to pre period and 72% do not have subsequent treatment in the available follow-up time, indicating a high level of efficacy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Meng ◽  
XiaoQin Wu ◽  
Zhen Sun ◽  
RenDe Xun ◽  
MengSi Liu ◽  
...  

BackgroundCurrently, three chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, and lisocabtagene maraleucel have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of large B cell lymphoma, which provide a novel and promising choice for patients with relapsed or refractory to traditional anti-tumor treatments. Thus, it is pertinent to describe the efficacy and safety profile of the three products available by summarizing the current evidence.MethodsTwo reviewers independently searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, to identify studies related to the use of the three CAR-T cell products for treating hematologic malignancies published up to October 5, 2020. We pooled the overall response rate, complete response rate, cytokine release syndrome, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome of three products, and then performed subgroup analysis based on the type of product and type of tumor.ResultsThirty-three studies involving 2,172 patients were included in the analysis. All three products showed promising results in patients with different pathological subtypes and clinical characteristics that included those who did not meet the eligibility criteria of licensing trials, with overall response rates of nearly 70% or above and complete response rates of more than 50%. However, high rates of severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in patients undergoing axicabtagene ciloleucel treatment and life-threatening cytokine release syndrome in patients with leukemia undergoing tisagenlecleucel treatment required special attention in practice (31%; 95% CI: 0.27–0.35 and 55%; 95% CI: 0.45–0.64, respectively). Moreover, lisocabtagene maraleucel that showed a favorable efficacy and safety in the licensing trial lacked corresponding real-world data.ConclusionBoth axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel showed considerable efficacy in practice, but need special attention with respect to life-threatening toxicity that can occur in certain situations. Lisocabtagene maraleucel demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety profiles in the licensing trial, but lacked corresponding real-world data. Additional data on the three products are needed in rare histological subtypes to benefit a broader patient population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-159
Author(s):  
Kevin Tang ◽  
Loretta J. Nastoupil

ABSTRACT Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as a revolutionary treatment option for highly aggressive B cell malignancies. Clinical trials of CD19 CAR T cells for the management of relapsed and/or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) have shown markedly improved survival and response rates. The goal of this review is to evaluate whether the results from these clinical trials are reflective of real-world practices through the analysis of published literature of the commercially available CAR T cell products. We have found that despite the significantly different patient characteristics, the adverse events and response rates of real-world patients were similar to those of the clinical trials. Of interest, several groups excluded from the clinical trials, such as patients with HIV infection, chronic viral hepatitis, and secondary CNS (central nervous system) lymphoma, had case reports of promising outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-85
Author(s):  
Valeria Belleudi ◽  
Francesco Trotta ◽  
Filomena Fortinguerra ◽  
Francesca R. Poggi ◽  
Odoardo Olimpieri ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. bmjebm-2019-111226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duane Schulthess ◽  
Daniel Gassull ◽  
Amr Makady ◽  
Anna Ludlow ◽  
Brian Rothman ◽  
...  

With the increasing use of new regulatory tools, like the Food and Drug Administration’s breakthrough designation, there are increasing challenges for European health technology assessors (HTAs) to make an accurate assessment of the long-term value and performance of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies, particularly for orphan conditions, such as acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The aim of this study was to demonstrate a novel methodology harnessing longitudinal real-world data, extracted from the electronic health records of a medical centre functioning as a clinical trial site, to develop an accurate analysis of the performance of CAR-T compared with the next-best treatment option, namely allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). The study population comprised 43 subjects in two cohorts: 29 who had undergone HCT treatment and 14 who had undergone CAR-T therapy. The 3-year relapse-free survival probability was 46% (95% CI: 08% to 79%) in the CAR-T cohort and 68% (95% CI: 46% to 83%) in the HCT cohort. To explain the lower RFS probability in the CAR-T cohort compared with the HCT cohort, the authors hypothesised that the CAR-T cohort had a far higher level of disease burden. This was validated by log-rank test analysis (p=0.0001) and confirmed in conversations with practitioners at the study site. The authors are aware that the small populations in this study will be seen as limiting the generalisability of the findings to some readers. However, in consultation with many European HTAs and regulators, there is broad agreement that this methodology warrants further investigation with a larger study.


Author(s):  
Marjorie E. Zettler ◽  
Bruce A. Feinberg ◽  
Eli G. Phillips Jr ◽  
Andrew J. Klink ◽  
Sonam Mehta ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document