scholarly journals Tiotropium add-on therapy is safe and reduces seasonal worsening in paediatric asthma patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1801824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Vogelberg ◽  
Stanley J. Szefler ◽  
Elianne J.L.E. Vrijlandt ◽  
Attilio L. Boner ◽  
Michael Engel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unmet Need ◽  
Comprehensive Analysis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Safety Database ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Asthma Symptoms ◽  
Paediatric Patients ◽  
Asthma Patients ◽  
Symptomatic Asthma

There remains an unmet need for effective, well-tolerated therapeutic options in paediatric patients with not fully controlled asthma, for whom safety is of paramount importance.Data were pooled from five randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating tiotropium 5 or 2.5 µg versus placebo add-on therapy in patients with symptomatic asthma aged 1–17 years. Analysis included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) reported throughout and for 30 days following treatment.Of 1691 patients treated, 1119 received tiotropium. Reporting of AEs was low and comparable across all groups: tiotropium 5 µg (51%), tiotropium 2.5 µg (51%) and placebo (54%). Reporting of drug-related AEs, those leading to discontinuation and SAEs was also low and balanced between treatment groups, irrespective of age, disease severity or sex. The number of AEs related to asthma symptoms and exacerbations was lower with tiotropium (5 µg) than with placebo, particularly during the seasonal peaks of these AEs.This comprehensive analysis of a large safety database allowed subgroup analyses that are often impractical with individual trials and provides further support for the safety of once-daily tiotropium Respimat add-on therapy in paediatric patients with symptomatic asthma.

Edoxaban Versus Enoxaparin for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Pooled Analysis of Coagulation Biomarkers From Stars E-3 and Stars J-V.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2260-2260
Author(s):  
Takeshi Fuji ◽  
Satoru Fujita ◽  
Shintaro Tachibana ◽  
Yohko Kawai
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Factor Xa ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Post Operation ◽  
D Dimer

Abstract Abstract 2260 Introduction: Edoxaban is an oral, once-daily, direct factor Xa inhibitor in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic events. Two randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III studies (STARS E-3 and STARS J-V) have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared to enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this pooled analysis was to investigate the effects of edoxaban on key coagulation biomarkers. Methods: Patients (N=1,326) undergoing TKA or THA in Japan and Taiwan were randomized to receive oral edoxaban 30 mg once daily (qd) or subcutaneous enoxaparin 2,000 IU twice daily (bid; equivalent to 20 mg bid) for 11–14 days. Edoxaban was initiated 6–24 hours after surgery and enoxaparin was initiated 24–36 hours after surgery, which is the standard of care in Japan. Blood samples were collected for coagulation biomarker measurements pre-operation, post-operation (pre-treatment, Day 0), Day 7 (prior to administration of the next dose) and completion day (Day 11–14). The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). The principal safety outcome was the incidence of major and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. Pharmacodynamic endpoints included key coagulation biomarkers such as D-dimer, prothrombin fragment F1+2 (F1+2) and soluble fibrin monomer complex (SFMC). Results: A total of 1,307 patients received at least 1 dose of edoxaban or enoxaparin. There were no clinically relevant differences in baseline characteristics between the treatment groups. The mean age was 68 years, mean body weight was 58.8 kg and 83% of patients were female. Overall, edoxaban significantly reduced the incidence of the composite of symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT and PE compared with enoxaparin (5.1% vs 10.7%, P<0.001). The incidence of major and CRNM bleeding events was 4.6% vs 3.7% in the edoxaban and enoxaparin groups, respectively (P=0.427). For both treatment groups, D-dimer and SFMC levels were reduced at Day 7 compared to post-operation/pretreatment levels, then increased slightly by Day 11–14. Levels of F1+2 also decreased by Day 7 in both treatment groups and further decreased by Day 11–14. However, for each coagulation biomarker, levels were significantly lower in the edoxaban group compared to the enoxaparin group at both Day 7 and Day 11–14. (Table, P<0.001). Conclusion: Edoxaban 30 mg qd is superior to enoxaparin 20 mg bid in the prevention of VTE events with significant reduction of D-dimer, F1+2 and SFMC following TKA and THA. Disclosures: Fuji: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Century Medical: Consultancy; Showa Ikakogyo: Consultancy. Fujita:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Tachibana:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Kawai:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Toyama Chemical: Consultancy.

scholarly journals Cefcanel Daloxate versus Penicillin in Acute Streptococcal Pharyngotonsillitis

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-124
Author(s):  
A Grunfeld ◽  
P Sinclair ◽  
LE Nicolle ◽  
the Canadian Tonsillitis Study Group
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Cure ◽  
Elimination Rate ◽  
Safety Evaluation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Group A ◽  
Daily Dose Regimen ◽  
Cure Rates

Objective: To determine the efficacy, safety and tolerance of cefcanel daloxate and phenoxymethylpenicillin (PcV) in the treatment of acute pharyngotonsillitis caused by beta-hemolytic streptococci group A (bhsga).Patients and Methods: Randomized, double-blind, multicentre study with subjects randomized 1:1:1:1 to four parallel treatment groups: cefcanel daloxate 150 mg bid, 300 mg bid, 600 mg daily and PcV 300 mg tid. Patients were treated for 10 days with clinical, bacteriological and safety evaluation at inclusion, during therapy (day 5), early after completion of therapy (day 14) and two weeks later (day 28).Results: Of 340 subjects enrolled, 324 were valid for safety analysis and 249 for efficacy analysis. At the short term visit, clinical cure rates for cefcanel daloxate 300 mg bid and PcV groups were similar at approximately 70%. The cure rates for cefcanel daloxate 150 mg bid and 600 mg daily were significantly worse at 57.4 and 54.4%. Approximately 80% of all pretherapy throat swabs grewbhsga. Allbhsgawere susceptible or intermediately susceptible to PcV and cefcanel. The bacterial elimination rate for cefcanel daloxate was 82.8% and for PcV it was 89.8%. The elimination rate was significantly lower in the cefcanel daloxate 150 mg bid and 600 mg daily groups. The clinical cure rates and the bacteriological elimination rates increased by about 10% for cefcanel daloxate 300 mg bid and the PcV groups at the last valid visit and remained significantly better than the other two cefcanel daloxate doses. Adverse events were not significantly different among the four treatment groups.Conclusions: Cefcanel daloxate 300 mg bid was as effective and as well tolerated as PcV 300 mg tid in the treatment of acute pharyngotonsillitis. A lower dose or once-daily dose regimen of cefcanel daloxate was not as effective clinically or bacteriologically.

scholarly journals Randomized, Controlled Trial of TRC101 to Increase Serum Bicarbonate in Patients with CKD

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Bushinsky ◽  
Thomas Hostetter ◽  
Gerrit Klaerner ◽  
Yuri Stasiv ◽  
Claire Lockey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Acidosis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Serum Bicarbonate ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
End Of Treatment ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Group Serum

Background and objectivesMetabolic acidosis is common in patients with CKD and has significant adverse effects on kidney, muscle, and bone. We tested the efficacy and safety of TRC101, a novel, sodium-free, nonabsorbed hydrochloric acid binder, to increase serum bicarbonate in patients with CKD and metabolic acidosis.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsOne hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, in-unit study (designated the TRCA-101 Study). Patients had a mean baseline eGFR of 35 ml/min per 1.73 m2, a mean baseline serum bicarbonate of 17.7 mEq/L, and comorbidities, including hypertension (93%), diabetes (70%), and heart failure (21%). Patients ate a controlled diet and were treated for 14 days with placebo or one of four TRC101 dosing regimens (1.5, 3, or 4.5 g twice daily or 6 g once daily). After treatment, patients were discharged and followed for 7–14 days.ResultsAll TRC101 treatment groups had a mean within-group increase in serum bicarbonate of ≥1.3 mEq/L (P<0.001) within 72 hours of the first dose and a mean increase in serum bicarbonate of 3.2–3.9 mEq/L (P<0.001) at the end of treatment compared with placebo, in which serum bicarbonate did not change. In the combined TRC101 treatment group, serum bicarbonate was normalized (22–29 mEq/L) at the end of treatment in 35% of patients and increased by ≥4 mEq/L in 39% of patients. After discontinuation of TRC101, serum bicarbonate decreased nearly to baseline levels within 2 weeks. All adverse events were mild or moderate, with gastrointestinal events most common. All patients completed the study.ConclusionsTRC101 safely and significantly increased the level of serum bicarbonate in patients with metabolic acidosis and CKD.

scholarly journals POS0086 ANALYSIS OF DISEASE ACTIVITY MEASURES IN THE CONTEXT OF A METHOTREXATE WITHDRAWAL STUDY AMONG PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB 11 MG ONCE DAILY + METHOTREXATE: POST HOC ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM ORAL SHIFT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 251.2-251
Author(s):  
R. Fleischmann ◽  
B. Haraoui ◽  
M. H. Buch ◽  
D. Gold ◽  
G. Sawyerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Activity Measures ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Disease Activity Measures

Background:The Phase 3b/4 study ORAL Shift demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety of tofacitinib modified-release (MR) 11 mg once daily (QD) following methotrexate (MTX) withdrawal that was non-inferior to continued tofacitinib + MTX use (per DAS28-4[ESR]), in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved CDAI-defined low disease activity (LDA) with tofacitinib + MTX at Week (W)24.1Objectives:To assess the performance of alternative disease activity measures at W24 (randomisation) and W48 (study endpoint) in ORAL Shift.Methods:ORAL Shift (NCT02831855) enrolled pts aged ≥18 years with moderate to severe RA and an inadequate response to MTX. Pts received open-label tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD + MTX for 24 weeks. Achievement of CDAI LDA (≤10) at W24 was set as the criteria for entry to the 24-week double-blind MTX withdrawal phase, with pts randomised 1:1 to receive tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD + placebo (PBO) (ie blinded MTX withdrawal) or continue tofacitinib + MTX. In this post hoc analysis, efficacy analyses were performed in 8 subgroups defined by achievement of various disease activity criteria at W24: DAS28-4(ESR) remission (<2.6) or LDA (≤3.2); DAS28-4(CRP) <2.6 or ≤3.2; RAPID3 remission (≤3) or LDA (≤6); CDAI remission (≤2.8); and SDAI remission (≤3.3). For each subgroup, the proportion of pts who achieved the corresponding disease activity criterion at W48 was calculated, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. The change (Δ) from W24 to W48 in least squares (LS) mean DAS28-4(ESR) and DAS28-4(CRP) was also calculated in each subgroup, with a 95% CI for the difference between treatment groups estimated using a mixed model with repeated measures. Nominal p values were calculated and are presented with no formal statistical hypothesis testing formulated.Results:Overall, 694 pts entered the open-label phase of ORAL Shift, and 530 were randomised and received treatment in the double-blind phase; 264 and 266 pts received tofacitinib + PBO and tofacitinib + MTX, respectively (Figure 1a). Considering those pts who were randomised and treated, the proportion of pts achieving each disease activity criterion at W24 varied, but was similar between treatments within each subgroup (Figure 1a). Among pts who met each disease activity criterion at W24, generally the majority of pts in both treatment groups also met the same criterion at W48 (Figure 1b). Numerically more pts receiving tofacitinib + MTX vs tofacitinib + PBO continued to meet the corresponding criterion at W48. Regardless of the disease activity criterion met at W24, differences between treatment groups in LS mean ΔDAS28-4(ESR) (Figure 1c) and ΔDAS28-4(CRP) (data not shown) from W24 to W48 favoured tofacitinib + MTX vs tofacitinib + PBO.Conclusion:This post hoc analysis of data from pts randomised and treated in ORAL Shift demonstrated that, regardless of the disease activity state criterion met at W24, generally a majority of pts receiving tofacitinib maintained achievement of the corresponding disease activity criterion at W48, with or without continued MTX. Differences between treatment groups in LS mean ΔDAS28-4(ESR) from W24 to W48, as defined by achievement of LDA or remission with a variety of disease activity measures, were less than a change of 1.2, which is considered to be the threshold for a minimal clinically important improvement.2References:[1]Cohen et al. Lancet Rheumatol 2019; 1: E23-34.[2]Ward et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 1691-1696.Acknowledgements:Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Gemma Turner, CMC Connect, and funded by Pfizer Inc.Disclosure of Interests:Roy Fleischmann Speakers bureau: Pfizer Inc, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Samumed, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, VORSO, Boulos Haraoui Speakers bureau: Amgen, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Maya H Buch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Pfizer Inc, Roche, UCB, David Gold Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Gosford Sawyerr Consultant of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Syneos Health Inc, Harry Shi Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Annette Diehl Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Kristen Lee Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc.

Loratadine (SCH29851) 40 mg Once Daily versus Terfenadine 60 mg Twice Daily in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

1987 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bruttmann ◽  
P. Pedrali
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Placebo Group ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Placebo Patient ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Nasal Symptoms ◽  
Active Medication ◽  
Significant Difference

Seventy patients received loratadine 40 mg once daily, terfenadine 60 mg twice daily, or placebo in a 14-day, double-blind, randomized study. Four nasal and four non-nasal symptoms associated with allergic rhinitis were evaluated. At the endpoint (the last evaluable visit), the mean total scores of combined nasal and non-nasal symptoms decreased (improved) from the baseline by 51.8% and 55.7% with loratadine and terfenadine, respectively, but increased (worsened) by 6.1% with placebo. There was a significant difference between both the loratadine and terfenadine treatment groups and the placebo group ( P=0.001) but not between the active medication groups ( P=0.608). Overall therapeutic response was good or excellent in 14 of the 23 patients given loratadine, in 18 of the 24 given terfenadine and in none of the 23 given placebo. The difference between each active medication group and the placebo group was significant ( P≤0.01) but there was no significant difference between the two active treatment groups ( P>0.35). No loratadine patient had any adverse side-effects. Sedating effects occurred in one terfenadine patient, headache in one placebo patient and two terfenadine patients (one terfenadine patient with severe headache discontinued treatment), and dyspepsia in two placebo patients. No anti-cholinergic effects occurred in this study. Loratadine 40 mg once daily was effective and safe in the relief of symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

scholarly journals Peripheral markers of thyroid function: the effect of T4 monotherapy vs T4/T3 combination therapy in hypothyroid subjects in a randomized crossover study

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulla Schmidt ◽  
Birte Nygaard ◽  
Ebbe Winther Jensen ◽  
Jan Kvetny ◽  
Anne Jarløv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Sex Hormone Binding Globulin ◽  
Metabolic Effects ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Peripheral Markers

BackgroundA recent randomized controlled trial suggests that hypothyroid subjects may find levothyroxine (l-T4) and levotriiodothyronine combination therapy to be superior to l-T4 monotherapy in terms of quality of life, suggesting that the brain registered increased T3 availability during the combination therapy.HypothesisPeripheral tissue might also be stimulated during T4/T3 combination therapy compared with T4 monotherapy.MethodsSerum levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), pro-collagen-1-N-terminal peptide (PINP), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (representing hepatocyte, osteoblast, and cardiomyocyte stimulation respectively) were measured in 26 hypothyroid subjects in a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial, which compared the replacement therapy with T4/T3 in combination (50 μg T4 was substituted with 20 μg T3) to T4 alone (once daily regimens). This was performed to obtain unaltered serum TSH levels during the trial and between the two treatment groups. Blood sampling was performed 24 h after the last intake of thyroid hormone medication.ResultsTSH remained unaltered between the groups ((median) 0.83 vs 1.18 mU/l in T4/T3 combination and T4 monotherapy respectively; P=0.534). SHBG increased from (median) 75 nmol/l at baseline to 83 nmol/l in the T4/T3 group (P=0.015) but remained unaltered in the T4 group (67 nmol/l); thus, it was higher in the T4/T3 vs T4 group (P=0.041). PINP levels were higher in the T4/T3 therapy (48 vs 40 μg/l (P<0.001)). NT-proBNP did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsT4/T3 combination therapy in hypothyroidism seems to have more metabolic effects than the T4 monotherapy.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy symptoms with pregabalin.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 553-553
Author(s):  
M. Karthaus ◽  
C. S. Karapetis ◽  
M. Brown ◽  
N. Pavlakis ◽  
T. Trarbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Persistent Pain ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Persistent Symptoms

553 Background: Sensorial peripheral neuropathy (PNP) is a major limitation for pts receiving oxaliplatin-based ctx for CRC. Pregabalin is widely used for treatment of oxaliplatin-induced PNP. We evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin vs. placebo for the prevention of paresthesia from the onset of oxaliplatin-based ctx over each cycle. Methods: Rd, db, placebo-controlled study in adult CRC pts with ECOG 0-2 to undergo a new oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA-based ctx. Pts were excluded if they had neuropathic pain or other of painful paresthesia prior to baseline. Paresthesia, dysesthesia, and pain were rated on a numerical scale (NRS 0-10) every day. Primary endpoint was the time of onset of persistent symptoms (NRS >4). Results: Of the 69 screened pts, 64 were randomized and 61 received study medication (32 pregabalin vs. 29 placebo). Pts were balanced in both arms regarding age, sex, stage, and ctx. There were no differences between both treatment groups for all PNP parameters at any cycle. One pt in both arms developed paresthesia (5.3%) after 9 cycles of ctx, 1 pt had persistent pain (placebo arm). During the follow-up period persistent paresthesic, dysesthesic, and persistent pain developed in 2 vs. 1, 2 vs. 2, and 0 vs. 2 pts, respectively. The study was terminated after a blinded data review found that there were very few events of persistent symptoms, which was then confirmed an interim analysis. Nausea and anorexia were the most frequently reported AE in both groups. Conclusions: The results of this study, which was terminated early at interim analysis, is that too few patients developed persistent symptoms to allow any meaningful treatment difference for prevention of neuropathic pain related to oxaliplatin by pregabalin. There remains an unmet need for oxaliplatin-induced PNP with new trial design issues in this field urgently needed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals P722 Upadacitinib was not associated with anaemia in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: Results from the U-ACHIEVE study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S580-S582
Author(s):  
G D’Haens ◽  
X Hebuterne ◽  
P D R Higgins ◽  
E V Loftus- ◽  
W Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
The Common ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Dose Dependent

Abstract Background Anaemia is a frequent complication in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC), and patients who respond to treatment generally show improvement in anaemia. Decrease in haemoglobin (Hgb) levels and anaemia may be associated with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, has demonstrated favourable dose-dependent efficacy in patients with moderately to severely active UC.1 This analysis of data from the U-ACHIEVE study addressed effects of UPA treatment on Hgb levels in patients with UC. Methods U-ACHIEVE (NCT02819635) was a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 2b clinical trial. Adults with moderately to severely active UC were randomised to receive 7.5, 15, 30, or 45 mg UPA or PBO once daily (QD) for 8 weeks. Hgb levels were measured for all groups at baseline (BL) and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. Mean change from BL was calculated for each group. p-values for comparison between UPA and PBO groups were calculated using one-way ANOVA; no multiplicity adjustment was applied. Percentage of patients with Hgb values grade 2 (15–20 g/l Hgb decrease from BL), grade 3 (&lt;80 g/l Hgb level or 21–29 g/l Hgb decrease from BL), and grade 4 (&lt;70 g/l Hgb level or &gt;29 g/l Hgb decrease BL) anaemia were determined for all treatment groups using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5. Adverse events (AE) were reported by investigators. Results Included in the analysis were 250 patients (mean age ± SD, 42.3 ± 14.2 years; disease duration, 8.2 ± 2.5 years). At BL, most treatment groups had similar mean Hgb levels, except for the 15 mg UPA group, which had significantly lower Hgb levels vs. PBO group (Table). Increased or stable mean levels of Hgb at week 8 vs. BL were observed in most UPA treatment groups. The PBO group had the greatest decrease in Hgb vs. BL at week 8 compared with UPA treatment groups (Figure). Grade ≥2 anaemia was reported in 17.4% of patients receiving PBO and 14.4% of all patients receiving UPA (14.9%, 12.2%, 12.0%, and 17.9% of patients receiving 7.5, 15, 30, and 45 mg UPA, respectively). Grade ≥3 anaemia was reported in 8.7% of patients receiving PBO and 5% of all patients receiving UPA (6.4%, 6.1%, 6.0%, and 1.8% of patients receiving 7.5, 15, 30, and 45 mg UPA, respectively). One subject receiving 7.5 mg QD UPA had grade 4 anaemia. AE of anaemia was reported in 6.5% of patients receiving PBO and in 2.1%, 8.2%, and 3.8% of patients receiving 7.5, 15, and 30 mg UPA, respectively, but not in the 45 mg UPA group. Conclusion Decreased Hgb levels over time were observed more frequently in the PBO group. The maintenance of Hgb levels in patients receiving UPA was likely because of improvement of underlying UC. Reference

Effect of Fenticonazole Spray in Cutaneous Mycosis: A Double-Blind Clinical Trial versus Cyclopyroxolamine Spray

1990 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Altmeyer ◽  
S. Nolting ◽  
A. Kuhlwein ◽  
E. Colli ◽  
M. Scatigna
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Clinical Improvement ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
Cutaneous Mycosis ◽  
Drug Free ◽  
Microscopic Findings

A double-blind clinical trial was performed to evaluate efficacy and tolerance of once-daily 2% fenticonazole compared with 1% cyclopyroxolamine spray applied for 2–4 weeks in 100 patients with cutaneous mycotic lesions. After treatment lasting 21.9 ± 6.7 or 22.5 ± 6.2 days, respectively, patients receiving fenticonazole or cyclopyroxolamine had negative microscopic findings and cultures were sterile. Comparable clinical improvement was observed in both treatment groups, with 91.8% and 89.8% of patients, respectively, receiving fenticonazole or cyclopyroxolamine being evaluated as cured or greatly improved. Following a drug-free period, the clinical evaluation of nine (20.9%) patients treated with fenticonazole and 14 (30.4%) treated with cyclopyroxolamine worsened. The incidence of side-effects was low; only one patient withdrew from treatment because of a slight itch. It is suggested that fenticonazole and cyclopyroxolamine are equally effective in eradicating cutaneous mycoses and that their efficacy and tolerance are comparable.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document