scholarly journals A near-peer teaching program designed, developed and delivered exclusively by recent medical graduates for final year medical students sitting the final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa S Rashid ◽  
Oluwaseun Sobowale ◽  
David Gore
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Peer Teaching ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Teaching Program ◽  
Medical Graduates

Klinisch-praktische Prüfungen in der orthopädischen Lehre: Wer ist der „ideale“ Prüfer?

2017 ◽  
Vol 155 (04) ◽  
pp. 468-475
Author(s):  
Peter Melcher ◽  
Andreas Roth ◽  
Mohamed Ghanem ◽  
Daisy Rotzoll
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Peer Teaching ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Ärztliche Ausbildung ◽  
Praktische Fertigkeiten

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Die ärztliche Ausbildung fordert in zunehmendem Maße einen hohen Anteil an Praxis im Studium. An vielen medizinischen Fakultäten in Deutschland wird mittlerweile die OSCE-Prüfung (OSCE: objective structured clinical examination) eingesetzt, um praktische Fertigkeiten sowie Lernziele der Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation zu überprüfen. Die Vermittlung praktischer Fertigkeiten wird zunehmend unterstützt durch Einsatz von Simulatoren- und Simulationspatiententraining unter Einsatz des sog. „Peer-Teaching“-Verfahrens durch geschulte studentische Tutoren. In dieser Arbeit wird erstmalig der Einsatz von studentischen Tutoren als Prüfer in der OSCE-Prüfung Orthopädie dahingehend überprüft, ob unterschiedliche Bewertungen der Leistung durch einen Hochschullehrer oder studentischen Tutor erfolgen. Material und Methoden Prospektiv wurden die Daten von n = 94 aus n = 324 Studierenden des 5. Fachsemesters erhoben, die im März/April 2016 der OSCE-Station „Untersuchung der Wirbelsäule“ zurandomisiert wurden. Eine strukturierte Checkliste wurde hierzu entworfen und die beiden Prüfer (ein Hochschullehrer des Fachbereichs Orthopädie, ein studentischer Tutor) entsprechend geschult. Die Checkliste wurde von beiden Prüfern unabhängig voneinander ausgefüllt und anschließend einer statistischen Auswertung zugeführt. Die Auswertung nach Gesamtpunkten, Bewertungsblöcken und Prüfungstagen erfolgte mittels SPSS. Ergebnisse Die durchschnittlich erreichte Punktzahl in der Gesamtbewertung lag bei 19,5 Punkten (maximal zu erreichende Punktzahl: 25), wobei der studentische Prüfer im Mittel 19,1 Punkte (SD ± 3,2), der Hochschullehrer 19,9 Punkte (SD ± 3,4) vergab. Signifikante Unterschiede in der Bewertung zeigten sich an Prüfungstag 1 (p < 0,001) und in der Gesamtauswertung (p < 0,001), während an den Prüfungstagen 2 und 3 einzeln betrachtet keine signifikanten Unterschiede zu vermerken waren. Schlussfolgerung Die Untersuchung zeigt lediglich an Tag 1 der Prüfung eine signifikant strengere Bewertung durch den studentischen Tutor. Bei einer Punktedifferenz von 0,8 aus 25 Punkten im Mittel und einer Interrater-Reliabilität von 0,95 kann aus Sicht der Autoren eine OSCE-Prüfungsstation zur Bewertung von Untersuchungstechniken und Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation in der Orthopädie nach entsprechender Schulung durch einen studentischen Tutor erfolgen. Grundvoraussetzung hierfür ist eine fundierte Schulung des studentischen Prüfers sowie die Entwicklung einer gut strukturierten und validierten Checkliste. Ebenso sollte eine stetige Plausibilitätsprüfung der Prüfungsergebnisse erfolgen.

THE CANCER PAIN OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION FOR EVALUATION OF MEDICAL STUDENTS

1999 ◽  
Vol 88 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 168S
Author(s):  
&NA; Sloan ◽  
M. Plymale ◽  
B. Vanderveer ◽  
P. LaFontain ◽  
M. Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination

A ‘Fair Play’? Comparison of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination of Final Year Medical Students Training in Psychiatry and their Supervisors' Appraisals

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Melding ◽  
John Coverdale ◽  
Elizabeth Robinson
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Good Method ◽  
Previous Method ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Simulated Patients ◽  
Written Test ◽  
Method Of Evaluation ◽  
The University

Objective: Expected standards for student performance in psychiatry can vary between supervisors and institutions. Recently, the University of Auckland required its academic departments to have an objective standard assessment or test for each student on a clinical attachment. We aimed to compare an objective structured clinical examination of final year medical students training in psychiatry and their supervisors' appraisals. Method: Assessment in psychiatry initially consisted of a two-hour written test. Subsequently, the test in psychiatry changed to a standardised, modified, objective, structured, clinical examination (OSCE) using simulated patients. The clinical supervisor rated each student on a set of clinical parameters using a scale of 1-6. In addition, members of the academic department of psychiatry separately tested the students with a modified OSCE on the last day of their clinical attachment. The results of the OSCE are compared with clinical attachment assessments and the previous method of evaluation, the written test. Results: There was no correlation between the written test and the supervisor's assessment for the clinical attachment indicating that the written test was not a good method of evaluating student performance. The correlation between the clinical attachment grading and the OSCE for year 1 was 0.4 (p=0.002) and for year 2 was 0.5 (p=0.001). However, marks for the OSCE were consistently lower than those given for the clinical attachment. Conclusions: The introduction of the modified OSCE had the desired outcome of changing students' focus from the pursuit of theoretical knowledge to the attainment of practical skills.

scholarly journals Use of Eye-Tracking Technology by Medical Students Taking the Objective Structured Clinical Examination: Descriptive Study

10.2196/17719 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. e17719
Author(s):  
M D Grima-Murcia ◽  
Francisco Sanchez-Ferrer ◽  
Jose Manuel Ramos-Rincón ◽  
Eduardo Fernández
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Eye Tracking ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Objective Evaluation ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Eye Tracker ◽  
Clinical Competencies ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Areas Of Interest ◽  
Tracking Technology

Background The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) is a test used throughout Spain to evaluate the clinical competencies, decision making, problem solving, and other skills of sixth-year medical students. Objective The main goal of this study is to explore the possible applications and utility of portable eye-tracking systems in the setting of the OSCE, particularly questions associated with attention and engagement. Methods We used a portable Tobii Glasses 2 eye tracker, which allows real-time monitoring of where the students were looking and records the voice and ambient sounds. We then performed a qualitative and a quantitative analysis of the fields of vision and gaze points attracting attention as well as the visual itinerary. Results Eye-tracking technology was used in the OSCE with no major issues. This portable system was of the greatest value in the patient simulators and mannequin stations, where interaction with the simulated patient or areas of interest in the mannequin can be quantified. This technology proved useful to better identify the areas of interest in the medical images provided. Conclusions Portable eye trackers offer the opportunity to improve the objective evaluation of candidates and the self-evaluation of the stations used as well as medical simulations by examiners. We suggest that this technology has enough resolution to identify where a student is looking at and could be useful for developing new approaches for evaluating specific aspects of clinical competencies.

scholarly journals Five years after commencing the objective structured clinical examination: are we getting it right? Medical students’ assessment as the measuring index

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 960-965
Author(s):  
Stanley Ukadike Okugbo ◽  
Peter Agbonrofo ◽  
Omorodion Irowa
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
The Self ◽  
Objective Structured Clinical Examination ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Main Method ◽  
Clinical Reality ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Self Administered Questionnaire

Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess our use of OSCE from the perception of final year medical students. Materials and methods: This is a cross sectional survey of final year medical students undergoing the final examination in Surgery. All 102 medical students in the class were given the self-administered questionnaire to fill. The data were collated into excel spreadsheets and analysed using the SPSS version 21. Results: A total of 79 completed questionnaires were retrieved (return rate of 78%). All the students knew about and had participated previously in OSCE, 94.9% accorded the OSCE fair. 76(93.2%) wanted the examination as the main method of clinical assessment, 38(46.6%) had adequate preparation. In terms of the OSCE stations not mirroring real clinical scenarios, 38(48.1%) disagreed, and 26(20.5%) strongly disagreed. 34(43%) disagreeing that the logistics was poor. The students rating of the OSCE, on a scale of 1 - 10, gave a mean score of >8 for spread of the OSCE stations, detail of the questions and objectivity of the examination. The nearness to clinical reality was rated as 7.52 with artificiality of the stations rated as 4.12. Conclusion: The OSCE has gained acceptance amongst final year medical students. Keyword: Clinical examination; medical students assessment; measuring index.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document