scholarly journals Perinatal outcomes of neonates born from different endometrial preparation protocols after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Li ◽  
Yi-Chen He ◽  
Jing-Jing Xu ◽  
Yu Wang ◽  
Han Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Perinatal Outcomes ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Perinatal Complications ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
Cholestasis Of Pregnancy ◽  
Risk Of Preeclampsia

Abstract Background Previous studies have focused on pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET) performed using different endometrial preparation protocols. Few studies have evaluated the effect of endometrial preparation on pregnancy-related complications. This study was designed to explore the association between different endometrial preparation protocols and adverse obstetric and perinatal complications after FET. Methods We retrospectively included all FET cycles (n = 12,950) in our hospital between 2010 and 2017, and categorized them into three groups, natural cycles (NC), hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and ovarian stimulation (OS) protocols. Pregnancy-related complications and subsequent neonatal outcomes were compared among groups. Results Among all 12,950 FET cycles, the live birth rate was slightly lower for HRT cycles than for NC (HRT vs. NC: 28.15% vs. 31.16%, p < 0.001). The pregnancy loss rate was significantly higher in OS or HRT cycles than in NC (HRT vs. NC: 17.14% vs. 10.89%, p < 0.001; OS vs. NC: 16.44% vs. 10.89%, p = 0.001). Among 3864 women with live birth, preparing the endometrium using OS or HRT protocols increased the risk of preeclampsia, and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) in both singleton and multiple deliveries. Additionally, OS and HRT protocols increased the risk of low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) in both singletons and multiples after FET. Conclusion Compared with HRT or OS protocols, preparing the endometrium with NC was associated with the decreased risk of pregnancy-related complications, as well as the decreased risk of LBW and SGA after FET.

P–677 Endometrial thickness, endometrial preparation protocol and number of euploid embryos transferred, significantly impact the live birth in frozen embryo transfer cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Liñá. Tegedor ◽  
I Elkhatib ◽  
A Abdala ◽  
A Bayram ◽  
K Ab. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ploidy Status

Abstract Study question Is the live birth rate (LBR) in euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles affected by the endometrial thickness (EMT)? Summary answer A significantly higher LBR was observed in patients with an endometrial thickness of at least 7.5mm (46.24% vs. 54.63%) What is known already Parameters assessing the endometrium prior planning a FET include endometrial thickness, pattern and blood flow. The impact of the endometrial thickness on ART outcomes is controversial, with conflicting results published. A recent meta-analysis evaluated whether EMT could predict pregnancy outcomes and suggested that lower EMT was associated with lower incidence of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR) and LBR. Due to heterogeneity of parameters evaluated between different publications, where embryos with unknown ploidy status were transferred, in conjunction with variability of stimulation protocols and the number of embryos transferred, the real effect of the EMT was difficult to infer. Study design, size, duration This was a two-center retrospective observational study including a total of 1522 euploid FET cycles between March 2017 and March 2020 at ART Fertility Clinics Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Participants/materials, setting, methods Trophectoderm biopsies were analyzed with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Vitrification/warming of blastocysts was performed using Cryotop method (Kitazato). EMT was measured by vaginal ultrasound prior initiating the progesterone administration (± 1 day) and LBR was recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed between LB outcomes and median EMT while controlling for confounding factors. Main results and the role of chance A total of 1522 FET cycles were analyzed: 975 single embryo transfer (SET) and 547 double embryo transfer (DET). The mean age of the patients was 33.38 years with a mean BMI of 27.1 kg/m2. FET were performed in EMT ranging from 3 to 15 mm and 50.52% resulted in a live birth. Though potentially all ranges of EMT were associated with LB, the median EMT in patients with LB was significantly higher than the median EMT of patients without LB (7.6mm vs. 7.4mm; p &lt; 0.001). The dataset was stratified into two groups based on the median EMT (7.5mm): &lt; 7.5mm (n = 744 cycles) and ≥ 7.5mm (n = 778 cycles). A significantly higher live birth rate was observed in ≥ 7.5mm group (46.24% vs. 54.63%. p = 0.0012). In multivariate analysis, EMT, FET endometrial preparation protocol, and number of embryos transferred were the main parameters influencing the chance to achieve LB: OR 1.10 [1.01–1.19], p &lt; 0.015 for the EMT; OR 1.84 [1.47–2.30], p &lt; 0.0001 for Natural Cycle protocol and OR 1.55 [1.25–1.93], p &lt; 0.0001 for DET. Intercept 0.18 [0.07–0.44] p &lt; 0.0002. Female age did not reach significance: OR 1.02 [1.00–1.04], p = 0.056. Limitations, reasons for caution Besides the retrospective nature of the study, the inter-observer variability in EMT assessment between different physicians is a limitation. The physician and embryologist performing the embryo transfer could not been standardized due to the multicenter design of the study. Wider implications of the findings: The EMT in FET may influence the LBR and should be considered as an important factor for the success of embryo transfer cycles. Whether these results can be extrapolated to fresh embryo transfer and to blastocysts with unknown ploidy status, needs further investigation. Trial registration number Not applicable

scholarly journals Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin injection before frozen embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes in endometriosis infertility

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanbo Du ◽  
Lei Yan ◽  
Mei Sun ◽  
Yan Sheng ◽  
Xiufang Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Hormone Replacement ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Abortion Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Control Group

Abstract Purpose To investigate the effect of hCG in hormone replacement regime for frozen thawed embryo transfer in women with endometriosis. Methods We performed a retrospective, database-searched cohort study. The data of endometriosis patients who underwent frozen embryo transfer between 1/1/2009-31/8/2018 were collected. According to the protocols for frozen embryo transfer cycle, these patients were divided into two groups: Control group(n=305), and hCG group(n=362). And clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, early abortion rate, late abortion rate and ectopic pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Results There was a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate in hCG group (56.6% vs. 48.2%, p=0.035) compared to the control group. And the live birth rate in hCG group (43.5% vs. 37.4%, p=0.113) also elevated, but the difference is statistically insignificant. Conclusion hCG administration in hormone replacement regime for FET increase the pregnancy rate in women with endometriosis.

The effect of assisted hatching on frozen embryo transfer live birth rate and clinic trends

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. e141
Author(s):  
J. Knudtson ◽  
C. Failor ◽  
J. Gelfond ◽  
T.A. Chang ◽  
R.S. Schenken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Assisted Hatching

scholarly journals Retrospective cohort study on preparation regimens for frozen embryo transfer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique Atkinson ◽  
Jenny Crittenden ◽  
Howard Smith ◽  
Cecilia Sjoblom Ahlstrom
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Natural Cycles

Objective: To examine the pregnancy outcomes from frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles using different endometrial preparation regimens, compared to ovulation induction with letrozole (letrozole OI). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Fertility centre in Sydney, Australia. Patient(s): 6060 frozen embryo transfer cycles. Interventions: Cycles were stratified into one of four ways to achieve endometrial preparation. These were either a natural, letrozole OI, OI with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH OI) or a programmed cycle. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was live birth rate per embryo transfer (LBR). Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy and biochemical pregnancy rates, adverse events including miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, stillbirth, neonatal death and multiple births. Ovarian stimulation parameters were also analysed including time taken to reach the luteal phase and the number of blood or urine tests required for monitoring of the cycle. Results: The LBR following letrozole OI cycles was higher when compared to natural cycles (OR 1.27 (1.07 – 1.49)) and programmed cycles (OR 2.36 (1.67 – 3.34)). There was no significant difference between letrozole OI and FSH OI LBR (OR 0.99 (0.76 – 1.28)). An improved LBR with letrozole OI compared to natural cycles was maintained when only women with a normal length cycle were considered (OR 1.44 (1.10 – 1.89)). There was a significant reduction in miscarriage rates when letrozole OI was compared to programmed cycles (OR 0.46 (0.26 – 0.83)). Conclusion(s): The use of letrozole OI for endometrial preparation in an FET cycle may be associated with higher LBR and lower miscarriage rate, compared to using a programmed cycle.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document