scholarly journals Primary tumor site is a useful predictor of cetuximab efficacy in the third-line or salvage treatment of KRAS wild-type (exon 2 non-mutant) metastatic colorectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuo-Hsing Chen ◽  
Yu-Yun Shao ◽  
Ho-Min Chen ◽  
Yu-Lin Lin ◽  
Zhong-Zhe Lin ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14592-e14592
Author(s):  
Kuo-Hsing Chen ◽  
Ho-Min Chen ◽  
Yu-lin Lin ◽  
Mei-Shu Lai ◽  
Ann-Lii Cheng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (11) ◽  
pp. 5693-5702
Author(s):  
HIDETAKA KAWAMURA ◽  
MICHITAKA HONDA ◽  
KOICHI TAKIGUCHI ◽  
TAKAHIRO KAMIGA ◽  
KATSUMASA SAITO ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 595-595
Author(s):  
J. Metges ◽  
J. Ramée ◽  
J. Raoul ◽  
A. Gourlaouen ◽  
M. Porneuf ◽  
...  

595 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) management has been clearly improved by targeted therapies such as anti VEGF and /or anti-HER1 drugs. The evaluation of the use of targeted therapies in the real world is strategic to assess health politics. OMIT Bretagne-Pays de la Loire is a network of private and public cancer centers that has been leading cohort studies evaluating Folfiri-bevacizumab treatment, the cost of targeted therapies and the succession of targeted therapies. Methods: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit and safety of three consecutive targeted therapies in patients with KRAS wild-type unresectable mCRC. Sex, age, localization of the primary tumor site, successive chemotherapeutic regimens, toxicities, response rates, progression free survival and overall survival have been studied. Results: 34 patients (22 men, 12 women, median age 63 years [43-82]) have been prospectively recruited between 2003 and 2010. All of them received bevacizumab specially in association with FOLFIRI, cetuximab in association with irinotecan, panitumumab as monotherapy and others chemotherapies than FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, XELOX. The primary tumor site was colon (71%), junction (5%), and rectum (24%). 22 patients had metastatic colorectal tumor, 28 were operated on their primary tumor and 12 underwent resection after one line of treatment. Patients received successively 3 to 8 different lines of treatment for progressive mCRC. Toxicities of targeted therapies were manageable. Objective responses were observed in 38% (13) of the patients treated with BBR, 37% (11) treated with CBR and 25% (6) treated with P. Disease stabilization was achieved in 32% (11) of the patients treated with BBR, in 10% (3) with CBR and in 8% (2) with P. PFS at 80 months is 15%. Median OS from first metastatic line at death was 47.43 months (24.23-70.84). PFS and OS curves will be shown during the meeting. Conclusions: Our study clearly shows that patients receiving successively the three schedules (BBR, CBR, P) have a high overall survival with manageable side effects. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15606-e15606
Author(s):  
Elena Fountzilas ◽  
Vassiliki Kotoula ◽  
Ioannis Sotirios Tikas ◽  
Kyriaki Manousou ◽  
Kyriaki Papadopoulou ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 (8) ◽  
pp. 2567-2575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Osumi ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Tetsuo Mashima ◽  
Takeru Wakatsuki ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14105-e14105
Author(s):  
Anni Ravnsbæk Jensen ◽  
Camilla J S Kronborg

e14105 Background: Patients with non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer can survive several years with palliative chemotherapy and newer biological agents. However, survival varies greatly within this group. The aim of the present study was to identify baseline predictors of overall mortality in an unselected cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Clinical information was collected from patient files in consecutive patients treated with palliative chemotherapy from August 2007 until June 2011. The primary outcome was overall survival. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the effect of predictive variables on time to outcome. The variables analysed were: Gender, age, performance status, primary tumor site (colon or rectum), status of primary tumor (resected or un-resected), metachronous metastases, more than two metastatic sites, liver-only metastases, and low albumin. Results: We included 314 patients (Median age 64.5 IQ (57-70) years, 194 (61.8%) male). Median follow-up for survival was 471 days IQ (257-708). One-year survival was 79%, CI (74-84%). Median overall survival was 676 days, CI (577-750). Following baseline variables were independent predictors of all-cause mortality: Primary tumor site colon HR: 1.49, CI (1.03-2.16), p=0.036, un-resected primary tumor HR 2.92, CI (1.85-4.62), p<0.001, metachronous metastases HR 1.72, CI (1.06-2.79), p=0.027 and more than two metastatic sites HR 3.46, CI (1.71-6.99), p=0.001. Both Performance status and low albumin were statistically significant in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In daily clinical practice, baseline predictors of mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer were colon as the primary tumor site, un-resected primary tumor, metachronous metastases, and more than two metastatic sites.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
Emily S Reese ◽  
Ebere Onukwugha ◽  
Nader Hanna ◽  
Brian S. Seal ◽  
C. Daniel Mullins

588 Background: The prognosis for elderly patients with metastatic colon cancer (mCC) is poor with 5-year survival rate of 6 %. There is limited evidence to explain why some elderly mCC patients progress through multiple lines of treatment and others with similar clinical characteristics do not. This study examines the predictors of second- and third-line chemotherapy receipts in Medicare beneficiaries with mCC who initiate treatment. Methods: Using the SEER-Medicare dataset, elderly beneficiaries diagnosed with mCC from 2003-2007, were followed until death or censoring in 2009. Treatment lines were classified in combinations of chemotherapy and biologics. Logistic regression was used to predict receipt of treatment and subsequent treatment. Results: Among 3,266 beneficiaries diagnosed with mCC and initiated therapy, 1,440 progressed to 2nd line treatment and 274 progressed to 3rd line treatment. The strongest predictors of progressing to 2nd line treatment was surgery of the primary tumor site (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 2.17-2.70) and regional/distal sites (OR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.14-1.53) and marital status (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.47-1.83). Older beneficiaries (80-84 years (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.26-0.37) and > 85 years (OR: 0.10, 95%CI: 0.08-0.12)) and those with poor performance status indicators (walk aid (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.82), wheelchair use (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29-0.64), and use of oxygen (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.69)) were less likely to proceed to 2nd line treatment. Older age was the biggest predictor of not proceeding to third-line treatment (80-84 years (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.28-0.61) & > 85 years (OR: 0.10, 95%CI: 0.05-0.19)). No variables were statistically significant in predicting receipt of third-line chemotherapy. Conclusions: Surgery of the primary tumor site and of regional/distal sites were the most significant clinical variables predicting whether or not elderly patients proceed to second-line chemotherapy. Sociodemographic variables also predicted receipt of second-line chemotherapy.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidejiro Kawahara ◽  
Nobuo Omura ◽  
Tadashi Akiba

Abstract Aim: This study aimed to evaluate a long-term outcome predictor after second-line chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer.Methods: Between 2013 and 2018, sixteen patients (twelve males, four females) with unresectable colorectal cancer who were administered TAS-102 as third-line chemotherapy in our institution were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The mean age was 65.4 (range: 46-79) years. Patients were administered oxaliplatin with oral S-1 (tegafur, gimeracil, oteracil potassium) (SOX) as first-line chemotherapy followed by irinotecan with oral S-1 (IRIS) as second-line chemotherapy.Results: The median survival time after second-line chemotherapy was 19.2 months. Significant differences in mean age, gender, body mass index, primary site of disease, pathology of primary tumor, depth of primary tumor invasion, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, and recurrence site of disease were not observed between patients with less than one year of survival versus greater than one year of survival. However, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at the beginning of third-line chemotherapy was the only factor of the ten evaluated that exhibited a significant difference. Primary tumor site (p=0.015) and NLR at the beginning of third-line chemotherapy (p=0.010) were independent contributing factors to predict survival after second-line chemotherapy based on Cox proportional hazards regression.Conclusion: NLR at the beginning of third-line chemotherapy is a useful predictor for unresectable colorectal cancer after second-line chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document