scholarly journals The epidemiologic impact and cost-effectiveness of new tuberculosis vaccines on multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in India and China

BMC Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chathika K Weerasuriya ◽  
Rebecca C Harris ◽  
C Finn McQuaid ◽  
Fiammetta Bozzani ◽  
Yunzhou Ruan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Despite recent advances through the development pipeline, how novel tuberculosis (TB) vaccines might affect rifampicin-resistant and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) is unknown. We investigated the epidemiologic impact, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of hypothetical novel prophylactic prevention of disease TB vaccines on RR/MDR-TB in China and India. Methods We constructed a deterministic, compartmental, age-, drug-resistance- and treatment history-stratified dynamic transmission model of tuberculosis. We introduced novel vaccines from 2027, with post- (PSI) or both pre- and post-infection (P&PI) efficacy, conferring 10 years of protection, with 50% efficacy. We measured vaccine cost-effectiveness over 2027–2050 as USD/DALY averted-against 1-times GDP/capita, and two healthcare opportunity cost-based (HCOC), thresholds. We carried out scenario analyses. Results By 2050, the P&PI vaccine reduced RR/MDR-TB incidence rate by 71% (UI: 69–72) and 72% (UI: 70–74), and the PSI vaccine by 31% (UI: 30–32) and 44% (UI: 42–47) in China and India, respectively. In India, we found both USD 10 P&PI and PSI vaccines cost-effective at the 1-times GDP and upper HCOC thresholds and P&PI vaccines cost-effective at the lower HCOC threshold. In China, both vaccines were cost-effective at the 1-times GDP threshold. P&PI vaccine remained cost-effective at the lower HCOC threshold with 49% probability and PSI vaccines at the upper HCOC threshold with 21% probability. The P&PI vaccine was predicted to avert 0.9 million (UI: 0.8–1.1) and 1.1 million (UI: 0.9–1.4) second-line therapy regimens in China and India between 2027 and 2050, respectively. Conclusions Novel TB vaccination is likely to substantially reduce the future burden of RR/MDR-TB, while averting the need for second-line therapy. Vaccination may be cost-effective depending on vaccine characteristics and setting.

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (S1) ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Yuehua Liu ◽  
Zhao Liu ◽  
Zining Guo ◽  
Junting Yang ◽  
...  

IntroductionAccording to the World Health Organization, there were approximately 0.5 million new cases of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in 2018, of which 78 percent were multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), and China has one of the largest shares of the global burden (14%). In recent years, the Chinese government has made progress in TB control and prevention, but for MDR-TB, treatment options are still limited and expensive, and novel drugs are not always available. This research aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding bedaquiline to a background regimen (BR) of drugs for MDR-TB treatment in China, and to provide evidence for government to improve public health policies.MethodsA cohort-based Markov model was developed to evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of bedaquiline plus BR (BBR) versus BR alone in MDR-TB treatment, over a 10-year time horizon. Data were sourced from a phase II clinical trial, real-world data in China, published literature, and expert opinion. Outcomes were evaluated in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and life-years gained (LYG). The discount rate was 3.5%. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were conducted.ResultsThe discounted costs per person for BBR was CNY 135,706 [USD 19,172], compared with CNY 92,465 [USD 13,063] for BR. The discounted utility per person for BBR was also higher than that for BR (3.943 QALYs versus 3.193 QALYs). The ICER of BBR was CNY 58,096 [USD 8,208]/QALY, which was lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of CNY 212,676 [USD 30,046] (three-times the gross domestic product per capita). Therefore, BBR was considered to be cost-effective. The sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. BBR remained cost-effective in the sensitivity analysis, with a 77.2 percent probability of being cost-effective versus BR.ConclusionsIn China, bedaquiline is not included in the National Reimbursement Medicine List, which results in a heavy financial burden for MDR-TB patients. From this study, BBR was cost-effective by significantly reducing time to sputum culture conversion and increasing QALYs and LYGs, which offset the higher drug costs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 282-290
Author(s):  
Evita Sari ◽  
Neily Zakiyah ◽  
Prayudi Santoso ◽  
Melisa I. Barliana

Background: Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a burden on the healthcare system and public health. Evidence on cost and cost-effectiveness of MDR-TB treatment option is necessary in order to provide evidence-based recommendation for policymakers. The main therapy for MDR-TB consists of a combination of at least five types of anti-tuberculosis drugs, including second-line injections that have proven to be effective. Bedaquiline is a relatively new drug recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the treatment of MDR-TB. Aims and Objectives: This study examines the cost-effectiveness of using regimens containing bedaquiline compared to those containing second-line injections. Methods: The design of this study is a literature review study. The following keywords used for the search were: “MDR-TB,” “cost effectiveness analysis of MDR-TB,” “cost effectiveness analysis of MDR-TB patients,” “WHO guideline for MDR-TB,” “Bedaquiline cost effectiveness,” and “kanamycin cost effectiveness.” The relevant references were derived from several databases, including PubMed, NCBI, and the Journal of Indonesian Health Economics. A total of 170 articles were obtained during the initial search, then extracted with inclusion criteria, namely articles assessing cost effectiveness, QALY, DALY, articles in English and Indonesian, and publications within the last 10 years. Results: The addition of bedaquiline in standard therapy showed favourable effect and safety due to faster culture conversion time and less incidence of side effects, based on the results of studies. The faster the culture conversion occurs and the less patients experiencing side effects, the faster their health improvement, which prospectively will reduce treatment costs and productivity loss. Conclusion: This is demonstrated by the results of cost-effectiveness analysis which shows that the replacement of the second-line injection regimen to bedaquiline, and the addition of bedaquiline to the standard regimen of therapy was assessed to be a more cost-effective option.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Hu ◽  
L. Xu ◽  
Y. L. He ◽  
Y. Pang ◽  
N. Lu ◽  
...  

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) isolates resistant to the second-line antituberculosis drugs (SLDs) and its association with resistant-related gene mutations inMycobacterium tuberculosis(M.tb) isolates from Southwest of China. There were 81 isolates resistant to at least one of the SLDs among 156 MDR-TB isolates (81/156, 51.9%). The rates of general resistance to each of the drugs were as follows: OFX (66/156, 42.3%), KAN (26/156, 16.7%), CAP (13/156, 8.3%), PTO (11/156, 7.1%), PAS (22/156, 14.1%), and AMK (20/156, 12.8%). Therefore, the most predominant pattern was resistant to OFX compared with other SLDs (P<0.001). The results of sequencing showed that 80.2% OFX-resistant MDR-TB isolates containedgyrAmutation and 88.5% KAN-resistant isolates hadrrsmutations with the most frequent mutation being A1401G. These results suggest that improper use of SLDs especially OFX is a real threat to effective MDR-TB treatment not only in China but also in the whole world. Furthermore the tuberculosis control agencies should carry out SLDs susceptibility testing and rapid screening in a broader population of TB patients immediately and the SLDs should be strictly regulated by the administration in order to maintain their efficacy to treat MDR-TB.


2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agibothu Kupparam Hemanth Kumar ◽  
Alok Kumar ◽  
Thiruvengadam Kannan ◽  
Rakesh Bhatia ◽  
Dipti Agarwal ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTWe studied the pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin (LFX), pyrazinamide (PZA), ethionamide (ETH), and cycloserine (CS) in children with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) who were being treated according to the Revised National TB Control Programme (RNTCP) guidelines in India. This observational, pharmacokinetic study was conducted in 25 children with MDR-TB at the Sarojini Naidu Medical College, Agra, India, who were being treated with a 24-month daily regimen. Serial blood samples were collected after directly observed administration of drugs. Estimations of plasma LFX, PZA, ETH, and CS were undertaken according to validated methods by high-performance liquid chromatography. Adverse events were noted at 6 months of treatment. The peak concentration (Cmax) of LFX was significantly higher in female than male children (11.5 μg/ml versus 7.3 μg/ml;P= 0.017). Children below 12 years of age had significantly higher ETH exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h [AUC0–8]) than those above 12 years of age (17.5 μg/ml · h versus 9.4 μg/ml;P= 0.030). Multiple linear regression analysis showed significant influence of gender onCmaxof ETH and age onCmaxand AUC0–8of CS. This is the first and only study from India reporting on the pharmacokinetics of LFX, ETH, PZA, and CS in children with MDR-TB treated in the Government of India program. More studies on the safety and pharmacokinetics of second-line anti-TB drugs in children with MDR-TB from different settings are required.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 387-387
Author(s):  
Mehdi Javanbakht ◽  
Mohsen Yaghoubi ◽  
Atefeh Mashayekhi ◽  
Philipp Horvath ◽  
Alfred Koenigsrainer ◽  
...  

387 Background: The efficacy of systemic chemotherapy is still highly unsatisfactory for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastases (PM). The aim of this study was to assess the costs effectiveness of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) for advanced gastric cancer. Methods: We developed a state transition Markov Model to estimate the costs and effectiveness of the use of PIPAC C/D versus palliative chemotherapy. Intervention was assessed in two different levels including upfront therapy (PIPAC C/D plus XELOX chemotherapy versus first-line chemotherapy alone) and second line therapy (PIPAC C/D only versus second-line chemotherapy (ramucirumab monotherapy)). Data from multiple sources such as published literature and UK-based databases were used to inform the economic model. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the impact of key parameter variation on the results. Results: For the upfront therapy the estimated total costs in the intervention and comparator arms were £33,587(SD: £2,394) and £17,477 (£927) respectively. PIPAC C/D plus XELOX led to an increase of 0.56 in QALYs. Estimated incremental cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) was £28,879. Result from probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that PIPAC C/D plus XELOX is cost effective in more than 50% of Monte Carlo simulations at £30,000 threshold. For the second-line therapy, the total costs for PIPAC C/D was £15,985 (£1,391) and for the second-line palliative chemotherapy was £36,319 (£3,673). PIPAC C/D led to an increase of 0.21 in QALYs and £20,222 reduction in costs, meaning the intervention is dominant strategy in the second line therapy as it is less costly and more effective. Conclusions: The cost effectiveness results for the upfront therapy indicate that PIPAC C/D plus chemotherapy intervention is more costly and more effective and a cost effective intervention. PIPAC C/D only intervention has the potential to reduce costs and improve clinical outcomes for patients with advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis and therefore a dominant strategy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Musso ◽  
Silvia Mosti ◽  
Gina Gualano ◽  
Paola Mencarini ◽  
Rocco Urso ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) requires lengthy use of second-line drugs, burdened by many side effects. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) chronic infection increases risk of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in these patients. Data on MDR-TB patients with concurrent HCV chronic infection treated at the same time with second-line antitubercular drugs and new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are lacking. We evaluate if treating at the same time HCV infection and pulmonary MDR-TB is feasible and effective. Cases presentation In this study, we described two cases of patients with pulmonary MDR-TB and concurrent HCV chronic infection cured with DAAs at a Tertiary Infectious Diseases Hospital in Italy. During antitubercular treatment, both patients experienced a DILI before treating HCV infection. After DAAs liver enzymes normalized and HCV RNA was undetectable. Then antitubercular regimen was started according to the institutional protocol, drawn up following WHO MDR-TB guidelines. It was completed without further liver side effects and patients were declared cured from both HCV infection and MDR-TB. Conclusions We suggest to consider treatment of chronic hepatitis C with DAAs as a useful intervention for reintroduction of second-line antitubercular agents in those patients who developed DILI, reducing the risk of treatment interruption when re-exposed to these drugs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minakshi Rohilla ◽  
Bharti Joshi ◽  
Vanita Jain ◽  
Jasvinder Kalra ◽  
G. R. V. Prasad

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is identified from the time of introduction of antituberculosis treatment and is a known worldwide public health crisis affecting women of reproductive age group. Management issues raised by pregnant women with MDR tuberculosis are challenging due to the limited clinical experience available with the use of second line drugs. We hereby report two cases of MDR-TB during pregnancy: one patient was on second line drugs, while another one was evaluated and diagnosed to have MDR-TB in last trimester. At 6 months of follow-up both mothers and babies are doing well. The approach to such cases along with review of the literature is discussed.


2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 4786-4792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xubin Zheng ◽  
Rongrong Zheng ◽  
Yi Hu ◽  
Jim Werngren ◽  
Lina Davies Forsman ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTOur study aims to identify the clinical breakpoints (CBPs) of second-line drugs (SLDs) above which standard therapy fails in order to improve multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment. MICs of SLDs were determined forM. tuberculosisisolates cultured from 207 MDR-TB patients in a prospective cohort study in China between January 2010 and December 2012. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to identify the CBPs predictive of treatment outcome. Of the 207 MDR-TB isolates included in the present study, the proportion of isolates above the critical concentration recommended by WHO ranged from 5.3% in pyrazinamide to 62.8% in amikacin. By selecting pyrazinamide as the primary node (CBP, 18.75 mg/liter), 72.1% of sputum culture conversions at month four could be predicted. As for treatment outcome, pyrazinamide (CBP, 37.5 mg/liter) was selected as the primary node to predict 89% of the treatment success, followed by ofloxacin (CBP, 3 mg/liter), improving the predictive capacity of the primary node by 10.6%. Adjusted by identified confounders, the CART-derived pyrazinamide CBP remained the strongest predictor in the model of treatment outcome. Our findings indicate that the critical breakpoints of some second-line drugs and PZA need to be reconsidered in order to better indicate MDR-TB treatment outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document