scholarly journals Zanubrutinib monotherapy in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a pooled analysis of two clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keshu Zhou ◽  
Dehui Zou ◽  
Jianfeng Zhou ◽  
Jianda Hu ◽  
Haiyan Yang ◽  
...  

AbstractMantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a mature B-cell neoplasm with a high initial response rate followed almost invariably by relapse. Here we report the pooled data from 2 studies, BGB-3111-AU-003 and BGB-3111-206, to explore the efficacy of zanubrutinib monotherapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. A total of 112 patients were included. Median follow-up durations were 24.7 and 24.9 months for BGB-3111-AU-003 and BGB-3111-206, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were 84.8% and 62.5%, and median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 24.9, 25.8 and 38.2 months, respectively. After weighting, the PFS (median: NE vs. 21.1 months, P = 0.235) and OS (median: NE vs. 38.2 months, P = 0.057) were similar but numerically better in the second-line than later-line group. Zanubrutinib was well-tolerated with treatment discontinuation and dose reduction for adverse events in 12.5% and 2.7% of patients, respectively. Hypertension, major hemorrhage and atrial fibrillation/flutter rates were 11.6%, 5.4% and 1.8%, respectively. Zanubrutinib is efficacious in R/R MCL, with a favorable safety profile.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 858-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reid W. Merryman ◽  
Natasha Edwin ◽  
Robert Redd ◽  
Jad Bsat ◽  
Matthew Chase ◽  
...  

Abstract The addition of high-dose cytarabine to rituximab/bendamustine (RB) induction could improve outcomes for transplant-eligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). We conducted a pooled analysis of 2 phase 2 trials and an off-trial cohort each testing 3 cycles of RB and 3 cycles of rituximab/high-dose cytarabine (RC) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) among untreated, transplant-eligible patients with MCL. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and Washington University in St. Louis (WUSTL) led separate phase 2 trials testing sequential and alternating cycles of RB/RC, respectively. Patients treated at DFCI with sequential RB/RC off trial were retrospectively identified. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in the DFCI trial. A total of 88 patients (23 DFCI trial, 18 WUSTL trial, and 47 off trial) received RB/RC; 92% of patients completed induction, and 84% underwent planned consolidative ASCT. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events among trial patients included lymphopenia (88%), thrombocytopenia (85%), neutropenia (83%), and febrile neutropenia (15%). There were no treatment-related deaths during induction and 2 following ASCT. Among 87 response-evaluable patients, the end-of-induction overall and complete response rates were 97% and 90%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 33 months, 3-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 83% and 92%, respectively. Patients undergoing MRD testing experienced prolonged MRD negativity after ASCT with emergence of MRD occurring in only 1 patient who subsequently relapsed. RB/RC followed by ASCT achieves high rates of durable remissions in transplant-eligible patients with MCL. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01661881 (DFCI trial) and #NCT02728531 (WUSTL trial).


1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2819-2826 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Teodorovic ◽  
S Pittaluga ◽  
J C Kluin-Nelemans ◽  
J H Meerwaldt ◽  
A Hagenbeek ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Before recognizing mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) as a distinct entity, these patients were grouped into low-grade (LG) or intermediate-/high-grade categories (IGHG) according to the Working Formulation and received various therapies. This was a unique opportunity to evaluate characteristics, behavior, response to treatment, and outcome of patients with MCL from two phase III trials conducted by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): EORTC 20855 IGHG and EORTC 20856 LG. PATIENTS AND METHODS After histologic review, 64 diagnosed MCL patients (29 IGHG and 35 LG) were compared with other patients in their respective trials. In the IGHG group, patients received cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, teniposide (VM26), prednisone, vincristine, and bleomycin (CHVmP-VB) or modified doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide (VP 16), mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (ProMACE-MOPP). In the LG group, after receiving cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) induction, patients were randomized between maintenance treatment with interferon alfa-2a (IFN) or no further treatment. RESULTS MCL patients compared with IGHG subtypes showed a similar overall survival and response rate, but shorter duration of response and progression-free survival. Comparing with LG patients, their response rate, duration of response, and progression-free survival showed no difference, while their overall survival was nearly twice shorter. MCL patients treated with CHVmP-VB had the longest survival. No treatment showed any significant improvement in terms of progression-free survival. CONCLUSION These data confirm that MCL represents a clinicopathologic entity. In terms of survival, it behaves like IGHG subtypes, while in terms of progression-free survival, it behaves like LG lymphoma. It is still not clear which first-line treatment offers patients with MCL the best chance to obtain both a complete response (CR) and a long-term survival.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 705-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Ghielmini ◽  
Shu-Fang Hsu Schmitz ◽  
Sergio Cogliatti ◽  
Francesco Bertoni ◽  
Ursula Waltzer ◽  
...  

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of single-agent rituximab given at the standard or a prolonged schedule in patients with newly diagnosed, or refractory or relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).Patients and MethodsAfter induction treatment with the standard schedule (375 mg/m2weekly × 4), patients who were responding or who had stable disease at week 12 from the start of treatment were randomly assigned to no further treatment (arm A) or prolonged rituximab administration (375 mg/m2) every 8 weeks for four times (arm B).ResultsThe trial enrolled 104 patients. After induction, clinical response was 27% with 2% complete responses. Among patients with detectable t(11;14)-positive cells in blood and bone marrow at baseline, four of 20, and one of 14, respectively, became polymerase chain-reaction–negative after induction. Anemia was the only adverse predictor of response in the multivariate analysis. After a median follow-up of 29 months, response rate and duration of response were not significantly different between the two schedules in 61 randomly assigned patients. Median event-free survival (EFS) was 6 months in arm A versus 12 months in arm B; the difference was not significant (P = .1). Prolonged treatment seemed to improve EFS in the subgroup of pretreated patients (5 months in arm A v 11 months in arm B; P = .04). Thirteen percent of patients in arm A and 9% in arm B presented with grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity.ConclusionSingle-agent rituximab is active in MCL, but the addition of four single doses at 8-week intervals does not seem to significantly improve response rate, duration of response, or EFS after treatment with the standard schedule.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3989-3989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rory McCulloch ◽  
Carlo Visco ◽  
Rebecca Frewin ◽  
Neil Phillips ◽  
Toby A. Eyre ◽  
...  

Background Effective treatment for relapsed, refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) post Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi) therapy represents an unmet clinical need with studies consistently reporting dismal outcome. No treatment strategy demonstrates superiority and there is currently no consensus on management. R-BAC (Rituximab, Bendamustine and Cytarabine) has demonstrated excellent upfront response rates in phase 2 trials (overall response rate (ORR) 100%, 2-year progression free survival (PFS) 95%, Visco et al 2013), but with durable responses also reported with other combination therapies there is a rationale to reserve R-BAC for post-BTKi relapse. Aims There is currently no data available assessing efficacy of R-BAC in the post BTKi setting. We first adopted this treatment strategy within routine clinical practice in 2015 and in this study have collected and analysed clinical outcomes across 20 centers in the United Kingdom and Italy. Methods 35 R/R MCL patients (pts) with prior BTKi therapy started R-BAC between October 2015 and February 2019. Treatment consisted of rituximab (375 mg/m2 or 500 mg) D1, bendamustine 70 mg/m2 D1 and D2 and cytarabine 500 mg/m2 D1 to D3 in a 28 day cycle. 29 pts were treated in the UK and 6 in Italy. Analysis included one pt with previous alloHSCT. Response to therapy was measured using Lugano classification (Cheson et al, 2014), although assessment of CR with bone marrow biopsy was not always undertaken. Baseline data, including response to previous BTKi, was collected retrospectively by the treating physician. The primary outcome was PFS to R-BAC. Results Median age at time of R-BAC was 66.3 years (range 43 to 81) and 82.9% of pts were male. At initial diagnosis MIPI was 34.5% low risk, 17.2% intermediate risk and 48.3% high risk; histology was 20.6% blastoid. Pts received a median 2 prior lines of systemic therapy (range 1 to 6). Frontline therapy included high dose cytarabine containing regimen (61.7%) plus consolidation AutoSCT (40.0%), R-CHOP (26.4%), R-CVP (2.9%), FC (2.9%) and ibrutinib plus rituximab (5.9%). 7 patients received maintenance rituximab (28.6%). 45.7% of patients commenced second line therapy within 2 years of initial diagnosis. Prior BTKi therapy included: ibrutinib (n=30), acalabrutinib (n=2), tirabrutinib (n=2) and M7583 (n=1). ORR to prior BTKi was 67.6% (CR 35.3%) and median PFS was 9.2 months. All patients stopped BTKi therapy due to progressive disease (94.3%) or failure to respond (5.7%). All but 1 patient received R-BAC directly after relapse on BTKi. Patients received a median of 4 cycles of treatment (range 1 to 6). 9 pts received attenuated doses of chemotherapy at clinician's discretion from start of therapy and 13 additional pts received attenuated doses beyond cycle 1 (62.9% of all patients received some form of dose attenuation). ORR to R-BAC was 82.3% (CR/CRu rate 55.9%), median PFS 9.3 months (see fig. 1) and median OS 12.2 months. Importantly, outcome for 11 pts ≥70 yrs was similar to younger pts (median PFS 10.6 months vs 8.6 months, p=0.83). 53.5% of evaluable patients demonstrated longer duration of response compared with preceding BTKi. 25 pts completed the planned treatment course, 2 stopped early due to excess toxicity (prolonged cytopenias and infection) and 8 stopped early due to progressive disease. 9 pts received subsequent consolidation alloSCT, and 1 DLI. Although follow-up is short only 1 patient to receive alloSCT has relapsed. 13 patients overall remain in remission, including 5 beyond 12 months. 18 patients (51.4%) required admission during R-BAC, including 15 with neutropenic fever (42.8%) and 72.7% patients required transfusion support. There were no treatment related mortalities. Conclusion This high risk population with a short PFS to prior BTKi demonstrated an excellent response rate to R-BAC. Favorable outcomes in the cohort consolidated with alloSCT, and the generally short duration of response in other pts, suggests R-BAC can be primarily used as a bridge to alloSCT in suitable pts. Treatment had notable hematological toxicity but with efficacy maintained in older pts R-BAC remains a valid option in those deemed unsuitable for transplant, although judicious dose attenuation is advised. In an area lacking a clear therapeutic path, the results from our study support R-BAC being considered a new standard of care option for R/R MCL in the post BTK inhibitor setting. Disclosures Frewin: AbbVie: Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship ; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Meeting attendance sponsorship . Eyre:Roche: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: commercial research support; Janssen: Honoraria. Lambert:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Other: Funding to attend a scientific conference in 2018. Crosbie:Janssen: Honoraria. Rule:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kite: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Napp: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4490-4490
Author(s):  
Andres Palacios ◽  
Andres Lopez ◽  
Antonio Salar ◽  
Marta Cervera ◽  
Merche Gironella

Abstract Introduction: Mantle-cell lymphoma accounts for 3–10% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas, with a median survival not exceeding of 3–4 years and its remains incurable with conventional therapy. CHOP plus Rituximab can induce a molecular complete response in 36% of patients. More aggressive combinations, as Hyper CVAD achieved an overall response rate of 97% with 87 of complete response, data no further confirmed in other studies in which Hyper-CVAD together with Rituximab achieve an overall response rate of 62.5%, with 33% of complete responses (CR). Being toxicity high mainly in elderly patients. Infusional chemotherapy combinations have shown efficacy in mantle-cell lymphoma (as VAD). Based this premise and in the efficacy of infusional R-EPOCH in aggressive lymphomas (DLBCL and PMBCL) we have conducted a compassionate prospective study of non-adjusted infusional EPOCH-R in patients with mantle -cell lymphoma as first-line therapy. Aim: To evaluate the clinical activity and toxicity of non-escalated infusional EPOCH-R as upfront therapy in patients newly diagnosed of mantle-cell lymphoma. Patients and methods: Herein, 12 patients of an ongoing compassionate prospective study in newly diagnosed patients with mantle-cell lymphoma are reported. EPOCH-R consisted on Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 1, vincristine 0.4 mg plus doxorubicine 40 mg/m2 plus etoposide 50 mg/m2 days 1 to 4 in four day continuous infusion, cyclophsphamide 750 mg/m2 day 5, and prednisone 60 mg/m2 for 5 days, repeated every 21 days if feasible for 6 cycles. The median age of 65 yrs (range, 49–76). 50% of patients were males. 91% of patients presented with an Ann Arbor stage III–IV, high LDH in 50% of cases, leukemic status in 66.6%, Bone Marrow involvement in 66.6% and ECOG <2 was present in 91% of the cases. Results: The response rate to EPOCH-R was 100% with 91% complete response (11 out of 12 patients). Neutropenia grade III–IV was observed in 16% of cases and anemia grade III–IV in 16% of cases. One case of neutropenic fever and two cases of grade III diarrhoea. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that EPOCH-R is an effective as other more aggressive combinations and probably with less toxicity profile. More experience and longer follow-up is warranted to confirm this initial appealing experience.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (13) ◽  
pp. 2035-2039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Ning ◽  
Chelsea C. Pinnix ◽  
Bhavana V. Chapman ◽  
Jillian R. Gunther ◽  
Sarah A. Milgrom ◽  
...  

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) generally exhibits an aggressive disease course with poor outcomes. Despite inherent radiosensitivity, radiation therapy (RT) is not commonly used for MCL. This study assesses the role of low-dose RT (LDRT) with concurrent chemotherapy in relapsed, multiply refractory MCL. From 2014 through 2018, 19 patients with relapsed, refractory MCL had 98 sites treated with 4 Gy. Median follow-up from initial LDRT was 15.4 months. Patients had received a median 7 courses of chemotherapy since diagnosis, and 58% were ibrutinib-refractory. Of the 98 sites, 76% were refractory to ongoing chemotherapy, and LDRT was delivered with concurrent chemotherapy for 76%. The complete response (CR) rate was 81% at a median 2.7 months post-LDRT. There were no differences in CR despite ibrutinib-refractory disease, prior chemotherapy courses (&gt;5), or tumor size (&gt;3 cm). There were no RT-related toxicities. Overall survival at 1 year following initial LDRT was 90%, and 1-year progression-free survival following last course was 55%. In summary, LDRT is effective for relapsed, multiply refractory MCL, and may be safely delivered with chemotherapy, to multiple sites, and repeatedly without issue. By treating active sites of disease, LDRT can provide durable local control, help achieve remission, and potentially bridge patients to subsequent novel therapies.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (29) ◽  
pp. 3688-3695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre Goy ◽  
Rajni Sinha ◽  
Michael E. Williams ◽  
Sevgi Kalayoglu Besisik ◽  
Johannes Drach ◽  
...  

Purpose Although dose-intensive strategies or high-dose therapy induction followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation have improved the outcome for patients with mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL), most eventually relapse and subsequently respond poorly to additional therapy. Bortezomib (in the United States) and temsirolimus (in Europe) are currently the only two treatments approved for relapsed disease. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with proven tumoricidal and antiproliferative activity in MCL. The MCL-001 (EMERGE) trial is a global, multicenter phase II study examining the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients who had relapsed or were refractory to bortezomib. Patients and Methods Lenalidomide 25 mg orally was administered on days 1 through 21 every 28 days until disease progression or intolerance. Primary end points were overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR); secondary end points included complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results In all, 134 patients were enrolled with a median age of 67 years and a median of four prior therapies (range, two to 10 prior therapies). The ORR was 28% (7.5% CR/CR unconfirmed) with rapid time to response (median, 2.2 months) and a median DOR of 16.6 months (95% CI, 7.7 to 26.7 months). Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.6 to 5.6 months), and median OS was 19.0 months (95% CI, 12.5 to 23.9 months). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were neutropenia (43%), thrombocytopenia (28%), anemia (11%), pneumonia (8%), and fatigue (7%). Conclusion The MCL-001 study demonstrated durable efficacy of lenalidomide with a predictable safety profile in heavily pretreated patients with MCL who had all relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4474-4474
Author(s):  
Michael Herold ◽  
Antje Haas ◽  
Stephanie Srock ◽  
Sabine Neser ◽  
Kathrin H. Al Ali ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab plus chemotherapy has been proved to be the standard in treating advanced follicular lymphoma. However in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) the results are still controversial. Methods: In a prospective randomised trial (OSHO#39) we compared the efficacy and toxicity of MCP chemotherapy(mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 d 1+2, chlormabucil 3x3 mg/m2 d 1–5 and prednisolone 25 mg/m2 d q 4 weeks)versus MCP plus rituximab (375 mg/m2 d -1) in advanced indolent lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma. Here we present the results of the MCL subgroup (n=90) among the 358 randomised patients (FL, MCL, LPL). Study endpoints included overall and complete response rate (RR + CR), progression free survival (PFS), event free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Results: with a median follow-up of 43 months for the MCL subgroup we can provide relatively mature data. Concerning toxicities there was no striking difference between the treatment groups. The treatment results for the MCL patients are as follows: Conclusions: Concerning all end-points R-MCP is not superior to MCP chemotherapy alone in advanced mantle cell lymphoma. Immunochemotherapy is obviously not the solution for this poor prognosis lymphoma entity. Results R-MCP n=44 MCP n=46 p-value Response Rate 70,5% 63% .5074 Complete Responses 31,8% 15,2% .0822 PFS median 20,5 months 19 months .2482 PFS 42 months 31% 14% EFS median 19 months 14 months .1369 EFS 42 months 27% 11,5% OS median 56 months 50 months .4862 OS 42 months 60% 61%


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3675-3675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen E Spurgeon ◽  
Kamal Sharma ◽  
David F. Claxton ◽  
Christopher W. Ehmann ◽  
Carla Gallagher ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3675 Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains incurable and little consensus exists on the best standard initial therapy. However, improved understanding of disease biology has the potential to lead to novel treatment approaches including new perspectives on older drugs. For example, epigenetic modifications including altered DNA methylation and histone acetylation previously identified in MCL has provided the rationale for using the combination of a hypomethylating agent and a histone deactylase inhibitor. Here we show that agents with differing mechanisms have significant activity in previously untreated MCL. In addition to its cytotoxic effects in lymphoid malignancies, cladribine has hypomethylating properties. Vorinostat (SAHA) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) FDA approved in cutaneous T cell lymphoma with modest single agent activity in MCL. Preclinically, the combination of these agents has been shown to activate silenced genes. Since cladribine inhibits DNA methylation via a unique mechanism, it could also potentially inhibit histone methylation. We previously reported initial results of our Phase I/II trial combining SAHA, cladribine, and rituximab (SCR) for the treatment of B-cell non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) [Spurgeon et al, ASH, 2012]. Here we present the updated results from the Phase II portion of the trial in the untreated MCL cohort including response rate, overall and progression free survival, and correlative studies. Methods: The achieved phase II starting dose was vorinostat 400 mg po (days 1–14) combined with cladribine 5mg/m2 IV (days 1–5), and Rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV (weekly × 4 for cycle 1 and 1x/month) every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. Response evaluation occurs after 2 cycles and at the completion of therapy. Responding patients are eligible to receive maintenance rituximab. Phase II eligibility includes relapsed NHL as well as previously untreated MCL. The primary outcome is response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Scientific correlatives include analysis of CD20 expression, histone acetylation, gene microarray, qRT-PCR and HELP methylation analysis. To evaluate the possible effects of SAHA metabolism on toxicity and response, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B17 (UGT2B17) genotyping is also performed. This study continues to enroll patients. Results: 28 previously untreated MCL patients have been enrolled on the phase II portion of the study. 7 have not yet completed the planned 6 cycles; however, 26 patients have completed ≥ 2 cycles and are evaluable for response. The majority of responding patients have received maintenance rituximab. The overall response rate (ORR) is 100% (26/26) with 69% (18/26) achieving CR. Of those patients not attaining CR, 2 had blastic MCL and died, 3 have not yet completed active treatment, and 1 withdrew consent after two cycles. At a median follow up of 14.7 months (.07 – 25 months) 4 patients have relapsed and 3 have died. Of the relapsing patients, two had blastic MCL. None of the patients achieving a CR has relapsed. The estimated PFS curve (shown in the Kaplan-Meier curve below) did not reach the 0.5 level and therefore, median PFS could not be estimated. Toxicities were defined using CTCAE 4 and primarily include neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, anorexia, and dehydration. We found that cladribine hypomethylates DNA in vivo (8/8 pts) and inhibits histone methylation in vitro. There were no upregulated genes common to untreated leukemic MCL patients; however, a number of changes in gene expression were observed. For example, upregulated genes after treatment included DUSP2 (3 patients), FOXO3 (2 patients), NOXA1 (2 patients), CEBPb (2 patients) and p53 (3 patients). Conclusions: The SCR regimen has significant activity and shows epigenetic activity in previously untreated MCL. Initial follow up results are promising, especially in patients without blastic MCL who continue with maintenance rituximab. The SCR regimen should be studied further in NHL. Disclosures: Spurgeon: Merck : Research Funding. Off Label Use: vorinostat: off label use mantle cell lymphoma. Epner:Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (8) ◽  
pp. 2269-2271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Kaufmann ◽  
Markus Raderer ◽  
Stefan Wöhrer ◽  
Andreas Püspök ◽  
Alexander Bankier ◽  
...  

Abstract We evaluated a treatment strategy targeting both lymphoma cells (by rituximab) and the microenvironment (by thalidomide) in 16 patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Rituximab was administered at 375 mg/m2 for 4 weekly doses concomitantly with thalidomide (200 mg daily, with a dose increment to 400 mg on day 15), which was continued as maintenance therapy until progression/relapse. Thirteen patients (81%) experienced an objective response, with 5 complete responders (31%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 20.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3-23.6 months), and estimated 3-year survival was 75%. In patients achieving a complete response, PFS after rituximab plus thalidomide was longer than PFS after the preceding chemotherapy. Severe adverse events included 2 thromboembolic events and 1 grade IV neutropenia associated with thalidomide. Our results suggest that rituximab plus thalidomide has marked antitumor activity in relapsed/refractory MCL and a low toxicity profile, which warrants further evaluation in MCL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document