scholarly journals Comparison of different mechanical chest compression devices in the alpine rescue setting: a randomized triple crossover experiment

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Egger Alexander ◽  
Tscherny Katharina ◽  
Fuhrmann Verena ◽  
Grafeneder Jürgen ◽  
Niederer Maximilian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Compression ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Rescue Service ◽  
Correct Placement ◽  
Mechanical Chest Compression ◽  
Adequate Quality ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Alpine Rescue

Abstract Background Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in mountain environment is challenging. Continuous chest compressions during transport or hoist rescue are almost impossible without mechanical chest compression devices. Current evidence is predominantly based on studies conducted by urbane ambulance service. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of continuous mechanical chest compression during alpine terrestrial transport using three different devices. Methods Randomized triple crossover prospective study in an alpine environment. Nineteen teams of the Austrian Mountain Rescue Service trained according to current ERC guidelines performed three runs each of a standardised alpine rescue-scenario, using three different devices for mechanical chest compression. Quality of CPR, hands-off-time and displacement of devices were measured. Results The primary outcome of performed work (defined as number of chest compressions x compression depth) was 66,062 mm (2832) with Corpuls CPR, 65,877 mm (6163) with Physio-Control LUCAS 3 and 40,177 mm (4396) with Schiller Easy Pulse. The difference both between LUCAS 3 and Easy Pulse (Δ 25,700; 95% confidence interval 21,118 – 30,282) and between Corpuls CPR and Easy Pulse (Δ 25,885; 23,590 – 28,181) was significant. No relevant differences were found regarding secondary outcomes. Conclusion Mechanical chest compression devices provide a viable option in the alpine setting. For two out of three devices (Corpuls CPR and LUCAS 3) we found adequate quality of CPR. Those devices also maintained a correct placement of the piston even during challenging terrestrial transport. Adequate hands-off-times and correct placement could be achieved even by less trained personnel.

scholarly journals An alternative method of chest compression from over-the-head during cardiopulmonary resuscitation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczyslaw Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Respiration ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Confined Spaces ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Emergency Interventions ◽  
The Subject

Abstract Background Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial respiration using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side, with compression carried out from behind the patient’s head. Methods The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial respiration after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compression and respiration were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. The average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p<0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p<0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p<0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p<0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p<0.001). The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions The demonstrated higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method conducted by one person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions than only for CPR conducted in confined spaces.

Abstract 133: Electrical Insulating Gloves for Safe Hands-on Defibrillation Do Not Compromise the Quality of Chest Compressions

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob E Thomsen ◽  
Martin Harpsø ◽  
Graham W Petley ◽  
Svend Vittinghus ◽  
Charles D Deakin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Electrical Insulation ◽  
Compression Rate ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
Resuscitation Guidelines ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Class 1

Introduction: We have recently shown that Class 1 electrical insulating gloves are safe for hands-on defibrillation. Continuous chest compressions during defibrillation reduce the peri-shock pauses and increase the subsequent chance of successful defibrillation. In this study we have investigated the effect of these electrical insulation gloves on the quality of chest compressions, compared with normal clinical examination gloves. Methods: Emergency medical technicians trained in 2010 resuscitation guidelines delivered uninterrupted chest compressions for 6 min on a manikin, whilst wearing Class 1 electrical insulating gloves or clinical examination gloves. The order of gloves was randomized and each session of chest compressions was separated by at least 30 min to avoid fatigue. Data were collected from the manikin. Compression depth and compression rate were compared. Results: Data from 35 participants are shown in Figure 1. There was no statistically significant difference between Class 1 electrical insulating gloves in chest compression depth (median±range: 45 (28-61) vs 43 (28-61) p=0.69) and chest compression rate (113 (67-150) vs 113(72-145), p=0.87) when compared to clinical examination cloves. Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that the use of Class 1 electrical insulation gloves does not reduce the quality of chest compressions during simulated CPR compared to clinical examination gloves.

scholarly journals CPR Compression Rotation Every One Minute Versus Two Minutes: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Nutthapong Pechaksorn ◽  
Veerapong Vattanavanit
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Compression Depth ◽  
End Points ◽  
The One ◽  
Support Guidelines

Background. The current basic life support guidelines recommend two-minute shifts for providing chest compressions when two rescuers are performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, various studies have found that rescuer fatigue can occur within one minute, coupled with a decay in the quality of chest compressions. Our aim was to compare chest compression quality metrics and rescuer fatigue between alternating rescuers in performing one- and two-minute chest compressions. Methods. This prospective randomized cross-over study was conducted at Songklanagarind Hospital, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand. We enrolled sixth-year medical students and residents and randomly grouped them into pairs to perform 8 minutes of chest compression, utilizing both the one-minute and two-minute scenarios on a manikin. The primary end points were chest compression depth and rate. The secondary end points included rescuers’ fatigue, respiratory rate, and heart rate. Results. One hundred four participants were recruited. Compared with participants in the two-minute group, participants in the one-minute group had significantly higher mean (standard deviation, SD) compression depth (mm) (45.8 (7.2) vs. 44.5 (7.1), P=0.01) but there was no difference in the mean (SD) rate (compressions per min) (116.1 (12.5) vs. 117.8 (12.4), P=0.08), respectively. The rescuers in the one-minute group had significantly less fatigue (P<0.001) and change in respiratory rate (P<0.001), but there was no difference in the change of heart rate (P=0.59) between the two groups. Conclusion. There were a significantly higher compression depth and lower rescuer fatigue in the 1-minute chest compression group compared with the 2-minute group. This trial is registered with TCTR20170823001.

scholarly journals Effect of Early Supraglottic Airway Device Insertion on Chest Compression Fraction during Simulated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Randomised Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 217
Author(s):  
Loric Stuby ◽  
Laurent Jampen ◽  
Julien Sierro ◽  
Maxime Bergeron ◽  
Erik Paus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Early insertion of a supraglottic airway (SGA) device could improve chest compression fraction by allowing providers to perform continuous chest compressions or by shortening the interruptions needed to deliver ventilations. SGA devices do not require the same expertise as endotracheal intubation. This study aimed to determine whether the immediate insertion of an i-gel® while providing continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations could generate higher CCFs than the standard 30:2 approach using a face-mask in a simulation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A multicentre, parallel, randomised, superiority, simulation study was carried out. The primary outcome was the difference in CCF during the first two minutes of resuscitation. Overall and per-cycle CCF quality of compressions and ventilations parameters were also compared. Among thirteen teams of two participants, the early insertion of an i-gel® resulted in higher CCFs during the first two minutes (89.0% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.001). Overall and per-cycle CCF were consistently higher in the i-gel® group, even after the 30:2 alternation had been resumed. In the i-gel® group, ventilation parameters were enhanced, but compressions were significantly shallower (4.6 cm vs. 5.2 cm, p = 0.007). This latter issue must be addressed before clinical trials can be considered.

scholarly journals Comparison of standard and over-the-head method of chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - a simulation study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Ćwiertnia ◽  
Marek Kawecki ◽  
Tomasz Ilczak ◽  
Monika Mikulska ◽  
Mieczysław Dutka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Artificial Ventilation ◽  
Hand Position ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Confined Spaces ◽  
Medical Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Emergency Interventions

Abstract Background: Maintaining highly effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can be particularly difficult when artificial ventilation using a bag-valve-mask device, combined with chest compression have to be carried out by one person. The aim of the study is to compare the quality of CPR conducted by one paramedic using chest compression from the patient’s side with compression conducted from the ‘over-the-head’ position. Methods: The subject of the study were two methods of CPR – ‘standard’ (STD) and ‘over-the-head’ (OTH). The STD method consisted of cycles of 30 chest compressions from the patient’s side, and two attempts at artificial ventilation after moving round to behind the patient’s head. In the OTH method, both compression and ventilation were conducted from behind the patient’s head. Results: Both CPR methods were conducted by 38 paramedics working in medical response teams. Statistical analysis was conducted on the data collected, giving the following results: the average time of the interruptions between compression cycles (STD 9.184 s, OTH 7.316 s, p < 0.001); the depth of compression 50–60 mm (STD 50.65%, OTH 60.22%, p < 0.001); the rate of compression 100–120/min. (STD 46.39%, OTH 53.78%, p < 0.001); complete chest wall recoil (STD 84.54%, OTH 91.46%, p < 0.001); correct hand position (STD 99.32%, OTH method 99.66%, p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was demonstrated in the results to the benefit of the OTH method in the above parameters. The remaining parameters showed no significant differences in comparison to reference values. Conclusions: The demonstrated higher quality of CPR in the simulated research using the OTH method conducted by one person justifies the use of this method in a wider range of emergency interventions than only for CPR conducted in confined spaces.

scholarly journals Testing mechanical chest compression devices for pre-hospital patient transport under resuscitation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Jörgens ◽  
Jürgen Körniger ◽  
Karl-Georg Kanz ◽  
Torsten Birkholz ◽  
Heiko Hübner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Compression ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Physical Effort ◽  
Patient Transport ◽  
Device Stability ◽  
Mechanical Chest Compression ◽  
Electrical Devices ◽  
Hospital Transport

Abstract Background Mechanical chest compression (mCPR) offers advantages during transport under cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Little is known how devices perform en-route. Aim of the study was to measure performance of mCPR devices of different design during pre-hospital transport.Methods We tested animax mono (AM), autopulse (AP), corpuls cpr (CC) and LUCAS2 (L2). The route had 6 stages (transport on soft stretcher or gurney involving a stairwell, trips with turntable ladder, rescue basket and ambulance including loading/unloading). Stationary mCPR with the respective device served as control. A four-person team carried an intubated and bag-ventilated mannequin under mCPR to assess device-stability (displacement, pressure point correctness), compliance with 2015 ERC guideline criteria for high-quality chest compressions (frequency, proportion of recommended pressure depth and compression-ventilation ratio) and user satisfaction (by standardized questionnaire).Results All devices performed comparable to stationary use. Displacement rates ranged from 83% (AM) to 11% (L2). Two incorrect pressure points occurred over 15,962 compressions (0.013%). Guideline-compliant pressure depth was > 90% in all devices and compression-ventilation ratio was 40% (AM), 87% (CC, L2 respectively) and 93% (AP). Electrically powered devices showed constant frequencies while muscle-powered AM showed more variability (median 100/min, interquartile range 9). Although physical effort of AM use was comparable (median 4.0 vs. 4.5 on visual scale), participants preferred electrical devices.Conclusion All devices showed good to very good performance although device-stability, guideline compliance and user satisfaction varied by design. Our results underline the importance to check stability and connection to patient under transport.

Abstract 2043: Even Minimal Interruptions in Chest Compression for Ventilation Significantly Decreases Coronary Perfusion Pressure

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Yu ◽  
Giuseppe Ritagno ◽  
Jun H Cho ◽  
Shijie Sun ◽  
Max H Weil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Coronary Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Coronary Perfusion ◽  
Significant Delay ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
The Difference

We have previously reported, on the basis of experimental studies, that interruptions of CPR as little as 10 seconds adversely affect the outcomes of CPR. We therefore investigated interruptions of only 5 seconds for delivering ventilation, which corresponds to the current AHA algorithm in which of 30 compressions followed by 2 ventilations are mandated. We hypothesized that even 5 seconds interruption significantly reduces CPP and with significant delay prior to restoring pre-interruption levels. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was induced and untreated for 15 minutes in 33 male domestic pigs weighting 40±3 Kg. Chest compressions delivered with the aid of mechanical compressor (Thumper, 1000, MI Instruments) with a rate of 100/min. Ventilations were administrated with a compression / ventilation ratio of 30:2 such that 2 ventilations were delivered over a 5 seconds interval. CPP was continuously measured as the difference between comparison diastolic and simultaneous left atrial pressure. CPP significantly decreased during interruptions for ventilation from 20.5±12.8 mmHg to 9.8±6.7 mmHg( P <0.001). After chest compressions were restarted, the CPP increased to 12.5±7.6 mmHg after first compression( P <0.001). A total of 12±7 compressions over a mean interval of 7.2±4.3 seconds was required prior to restoration of CPP to levels corresponding to those that preceded the interruption. As little as the five seconds of interruption in chest compression currently mandated for 30 to 2 ventilations during CPR significantly reduced CPP and delayed restoration of CPP to its pre-interruption level.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document