scholarly journals Cervical cancer screening using HPV tests on self-samples: attitudes and preferences of women participating in the VALHUDES study

2021 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélène De Pauw ◽  
Gilbert Donders ◽  
Steven Weyers ◽  
Philippe De Sutter ◽  
Jean Doyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Large Majority ◽  
Urine Collection ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Specimen Collection ◽  
Clinical Accuracy

Abstract Background Interventions to reach women who do not participate regularly in screening may reduce the risk of cervical cancer. Self-collection of a vaginal specimen has been shown to increase participation. The relative clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on first-void urine (with Colli-Pee) and on vaginal self-samples versus on cervical clinician-collected samples is being investigated in the VALHUDES trial. The current study assesses attitudes and experiences regarding self-sampling among women enrolled in VALHUDES. Methods Questionnaires from 515 women (age 25–64 years [N = 498]; < 25 [N = 10], age ≥ 65 [N = 3], enrolled between December 2017 - January 2020) referred to colposcopy because of previous cervical abnormalities and enrolled in VALHUDES (NCT03064087) were analysed. Results Of the 515 participants, nearly all women confirmed that self-sampling may help in reaching under-screened women (93%). Nevertheless, 44% of the participants stated before starting collection that a clinician-collected sample is more effective than a self-collected sample. After self-sampling, the large majority of women (> 95%) declared that instructions for self-collection were clear, that collection was easy, and that they were confident about having performed the procedure correctly, for both urine and vaginal collection. However, a proportion of women found self-sampling unpleasant (9.5% [49/515] for urine collection; 18.6% [96/515] and 15.5% [80/515] for vaginal sampling with cotton swabs or plastic brushes, respectively). For their next screening round, 57% would prefer self-sampling whereas 41% opted for collection by a clinician. Among women preferring self-sampling, 53% would choose for urine collection, 38% for vaginal self-collection and 9% had no preference. Age did not modify preferences. Conclusion We conclude that both urine and vaginal self-sampling are well accepted by women, with a preference for urine sampling. Although the large majority of women are confident in their ability to perform self-sampling, four to five over ten women preferred specimen collection by a clinician. Trial registration The study VALHUDES was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03064087).

scholarly journals Women’s acceptability of and experience with primary human papillomavirus testing for cervix screening: HPV FOCAL trial cross-sectional online survey results

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e052084
Author(s):  
Laurie W Smith ◽  
C Sarai Racey ◽  
Lovedeep Gondara ◽  
Mel Krajden ◽  
Marette Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Positive Screen ◽  
Link Type

ObjectiveTo study participant’s acceptability of and attitudes towards human papillomavirus (HPV) testing compared with cytology for cervical cancer screening and what impact having an HPV positive result may have in future acceptability of screening.DesignCross-sectional online survey of clinical trial participants.SettingPrimary care, population-based Cervix Screening Program, British Columbia, Canada.ParticipantsA total of 5532 participants from the HPV FOCAL trial, in which women received HPV and cytology testing at study exit, were included in the analysis. Median age was 54 years. The median time of survey completion was 3 years after trial exit.Outcome measuresAcceptability of HPV testing for primary cervical cancer screening (primary); attitudes and patient perceptions towards HPV testing and receipt of HPV positive screen results (secondary).ResultsMost respondents (63%) were accepting of HPV testing, with the majority (69%) accepting screening to begin at age 30 years with HPV testing. Only half of participants (54%) were accepting of an extended screening interval of 4–5 years. In multivariable logistic regression, women who received an HPV positive screen test result during the trial (OR=1.41 95% CI 1.11 to 1.80) or were older (OR=1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.02) were more likely to report HPV testing as acceptable.ConclusionsIn this evaluation of acceptability and attitudes regarding HPV testing for cervix screening, most are accepting of HPV testing for screening; however, findings indicate heterogeneity in concerns and experiences surrounding HPV testing and receipt of HPV positive results. These findings provide insights for the development of education, information and communication strategies during implementation of HPV-based cervical cancer screening.Trial registration numbersISRCTN79347302 and NCT00461760.

scholarly journals Performance of an affordable urine self-sampling method for human papillomavirus detection in Mexican women

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254946
Author(s):  
Rubí Hernández-López ◽  
Luis Hermosillo ◽  
Leith León-Maldonado ◽  
Rafael Velázquez-Cruz ◽  
Leticia Torres-Ibarra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Urine Collection ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
The Impact

Introduction Urine self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening is a non-invasive method that offers several logistical advantages and high acceptability, reducing barriers related to low screening coverage. This study developed and evaluated the performance of a low-cost urine self-sampling method for HPV-testing and explored the acceptability and feasibility of potential implementation of this alternative in routine screening. Methods A series of sequential laboratory assays examined the impact of several pre-analytical conditions for obtaining DNA from urine and subsequent HPV detection. Initially, we assessed the effect of ethylaminediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as a DNA preservative examining several variables including EDTA concentration, specimen storage temperature, time between urine collection and DNA extraction, and first-morning micturition versus convenience sample collection. We further evaluated the agreement of HPV-testing between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples among 95 women. Finally, we explored the costs of self-sampling supplies as well as the acceptability and feasibility of urine self-sampling among women and healthcare workers. Results Our results revealed higher DNA concentrations were obtained when using a 40mM EDTA solution, storing specimens at 25°C and extracting DNA within 72 hrs. of urine collection, regardless of using first-morning micturition or a convenience sampling. We observed good agreement (Kappa = 0.72) between urine and clinician-collected cervical samples for HPV detection. Furthermore, urine self-sampling was an affordable method (USD 1.10), well accepted among cervical cancer screening users, healthcare workers, and decision-makers. Conclusion These results suggest urine self-sampling is feasible and appropriate alternative for HPV-testing in HPV-based screening programs in lower-resource contexts.

Role of Ancillary Techniques in Gynecologic Cytopathology Specimens

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
Andrea D. Olivas ◽  
Julieta E. Barroeta ◽  
Ricardo R. Lastra
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Invasive Procedures ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Dual Staining

The association between high-risk genotypes of human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) and cervical cancer is well established. As hr-HPV testing is rapidly becoming a part of routine cervical cancer screening, either in conjunction with cytology or as primary testing, the management of hr-HPV-positive women has to be tailored in a way that increases the detection of cervical abnormalities while decreasing unnecessary colposcopic biopsies or other invasive procedures. In this review, we discuss the overall utility and strategies of hr-HPV testing, as well as the advantages and limitations of potential triage strategies for hr-HPV-positive women, including HPV genotyping, p16/Ki-67 dual staining, and methylation assays.

scholarly journals Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection on subsequent cervical cancer screening completion among under-screened US women: MyBodyMyTest-3 protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa P. Spees ◽  
Andrea C. Des Marais ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Michael G. Hudgens ◽  
Sarah Doughty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Incidence ◽  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Cervical Cancer Incidence ◽  
Incidence And Mortality

Abstract Background Screening substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. More than half of invasive cervical cancers are attributable to infrequent screening or not screening at all. The current study, My Body My Test (MBMT), evaluates the impact of mailed kits for self-collection of samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on completion of cervical cancer screening in low-income, North Carolina women overdue for cervical cancer screening. Methods/design The study will enroll at least 510 US women aged 25–64 years who report no Pap test in the last 4 years and no HPV test in the last 6 years. We will randomize participants to an intervention or control arm. The intervention arm will receive kits to self-collect a sample at home and mail it for HPV testing. In both the intervention and control arms, participants will receive assistance in scheduling an appointment for screening in clinic. Study staff will deliver HPV self-collection results by phone and assist in scheduling participants for screening in clinic. The primary outcome is completion of cervical cancer screening. Specifically, completion of screening will be defined as screening in clinic or receipt of negative HPV self-collection results. Women with HPV-negative self-collection results will be considered screening-complete. All other participants will be considered screening-complete if they obtain co-testing or Pap test screening at a study-affiliated institution or other clinic. We will assess whether the self-collection intervention influences participants’ perceived risk of cervical cancer and whether perceived risk mediates the relationship between HPV self-collection results and subsequent screening in clinic. We also will estimate the incremental cost per woman screened of offering at-home HPV self-collection kits with scheduling assistance as compared to offering scheduling assistance alone. Discussion If mailed self-collection of samples for HPV testing is an effective strategy for increasing cervical cancer screening among women overdue for screening, this method has the potential to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality in medically underserved women at higher risk of developing cervical cancer. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02651883, Registered on 11 January 2016.

scholarly journals De-implementation and Substitution of Clinical Care Processes: Stakeholder Perspectives on the Transition to Primary Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E Hahn ◽  
Corrine Munoz-Plaza ◽  
Danielle Altman ◽  
Chunyi Hsu ◽  
Nancy Cannizzaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Readiness To Change ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Cost Cutting ◽  
Hpv Test

Abstract Background: New cervical cancer screening guidelines recommend primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for women age 30-65 years. Healthcare organizations are preparing to de-implement the previous recommended strategies of Pap testing or co-testing (Pap plus HPV test) and substitute primary HPV testing. However, there may be significant challenges to replacement of this entrenched clinical practice, even with an evidence-based substitution. We sought to identify stakeholder-perceived barriers and facilitators to this substitution within a large healthcare system, Kaiser Permanente Southern California.Methods: We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with clinician, administrative and patient stakeholders regarding: (a) acceptability and feasibility of the planned substitution; (b) perceptions of barriers and facilitators, with an emphasis on those related to the de-implementation/implementation cycle of substitution; and (c) perceived readiness to change. Our interview guide was informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Using a team coding approach, we developed an initial coding structure refined during iterative analysis; the data were subsequently organized thematically into domains, key themes, and sub-themes using thematic analysis, followed by framework analysis informed by CFIR.Results: We conducted 23 interviews: 5 patient and 18 clinical/administrative. Clinicians perceived that patients feel more tests equals better care, and clinicians and patients expressed fear of missed cancers (“…it’ll be more challenging convincing the patient that only one test is…good enough to detect cancer.”). Patients perceived practice changes resulting in “less care” are driven by desire to cut costs. In contrast, clinicians/administrators viewed changing from two tests to one as acceptable and a workflow efficiency (“…It’s very easy and half the work.”). Stakeholder-recommended strategies included focusing on the increased efficacy of primary HPV testing and developing clinician talking points incorporating national guidelines to assuage ‘cost-cutting’ fears. Conclusions: Substitution to replace an entrenched clinical practice is complex. Leveraging available facilitators is key to ease the process for clinical and administrative stakeholders—e.g., emphasizing the efficiency of going from two tests to one. Identifying and addressing clinician and patient fears regarding cost-cutting and perceived poorer quality of care is critical for substitution. Multicomponent and multilevel strategies for engagement and education will be required.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT04371887

What Has Changed Since the Introduction of Human Papillomavirus Testing with the Cytology-Based Cervical Cancer Screening System in Japan A Social Experiment

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Hashiguchi ◽  
Yoshifumi Nakao ◽  
Atsuko Honda ◽  
Atsushi Kawaguchi ◽  
Katsuyuki Hanashima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
City Government ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Screening System ◽  
Social Experiment ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Incidence And Mortality

Background: Uterine cervical cancer is the fourth most common female cancer in the world. In Japan, we have an apparently low rate of joining cervical cancer screening programs compared with Western countries. Furthermore, the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer among the younger generation has been increasing. Object: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and cytology in Japan. Methods: Collaborating with Saga City government, we initiated a cervical cancer screening system consisting of HPV testing and baseline cervical cytology from April 2011 as a social experiment. A total of 17,284 participants have been screened with this new combination system. Results: After HPV testing with cytology-based cervical cancer screening, the number of screenings done in women aged under 40 years has significantly increased. In addition, the number of women diagnosed with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 has increased (25 of 14,025 vs. 146 of 23,049 under 50 years: p < 0.001). Conclusion: These data suggested that the introduction of HPV testing with cytology-based cervical cancer screening as an adjunct to conventional cytology resulted in better efficiency and more accurate screening among the Japanese population.

scholarly journals Clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of primary cytology versus human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in England

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-675
Author(s):  
Irenjeet Bains ◽  
Yoon Hong Choi ◽  
Kate Soldan ◽  
Mark Jit
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Screening ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesIn England, human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is to replace cytological screening by 2019–2020. We conducted a model-based economic evaluation to project the long-term clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of routine cytology versus HPV testing.MethodsAn individual-based model of HPV acquisition, natural history, and cervical cancer screening was used to compare cytological screening and HPV testing with cytology triage for women aged 25–64 years (with either 3- or 5-year screening intervals for women aged under 50 years). The model was fitted to data from England's National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme. Both clinical and economic outcomes were projected to inform cost-effectiveness analyses.ResultsHPV testing is likely to decrease annual cytology testing (by 2.76 million), cervical cancer incidence (by 290 cases), and health system costs (by £13 million). It may increase the number of colposcopies, although this could be reduced without leading to more cancers compared with primary cytology by increasing the interval between screens to 5 years. The impact in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) depends on the quality of life weight given to colposcopies versus cancer.ConclusionsEngland's move from cytology to HPV screening may potentially be life-saving and cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness can be improved further by extending the interval between screens or using alternative triage methods such as partial or full genotyping.

scholarly journals Community level barriers for cervical cancer screening in marginalized population

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 5006
Author(s):  
Kranti Vora ◽  
Shahin Saiyed ◽  
Rajendra Joshi ◽  
Senthil Natesan
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Large Population ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Hpv Testing ◽  
Screening Programs

Background: In India, cervical cancer is the second common cause of cancer deaths among women of reproductive age, with 469 million Indian women at risk. High risk human papillomavirus genotypes mainly 16 and 18 account of cervical cancer. The burden of cervical cancer can be reduced by regular screening of human papillomavirus (HPV). There is no specific national program for cervical cancer screening. Eligible women have limited knowledge of screening and also limited access to preventive screenings.Methods: The study was conducted in the slum areas of Ahmedabad city in Gujarat. 1088 women between 30-45 years of age were recruited in the study and 536 women consented to give cervical samples for DNA based HPV testing. We collected information regarding knowledge and practice for cervical cancer and HPV along with demographic data.Results: Lack of knowledge and practices around cervical cancer and screening among community women was found. There is a lack of awareness about the importance of preventive healthcare and near absence of evidence-based practices. Sociodemographic characteristics are important predictors of participation in the screening program.Conclusions: In the Indian context, HPV testing is a cost-effective option to prevent cervical cancer. The burden of cervical cancer is incredibly high. With increased ability to accurately detect, population level HPV testing would reduce the burden of cervical cancer and the ultimate cost per person would be minimal, due to the country’s large population. There is a need to develop policy to ensure participation of women in the HPV based cervical cancer screening programs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document