The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population

Both the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 (Section III) classification systems introduced dimensional models of personality disorders, with five broad domains called the Pathological Big Five. Nevertheless, despite large congruence between the two models, there are also substantial differences between them, with the most evident being the conceptualization of the fifth dimension: Anankastia in the ICD-11 vs. Psychoticism in the DSM-5. The current paper seeks an answer to the question of which domain is structurally better justified as the fifth trait in the dimensional model of personality disorders. For this purpose, we provided both a conceptual and empirical comparison of the ICD-11 and the DSM-5 models, adopting the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits—a comprehensive model of personality structure built on the basis of the higher-order factors of the Big Five—as a reference framework. Two studies were conducted: the first on a sample of 242 adults (52.9% female; Mage = 30.63, SDage = 11.82 years), and the second on a sample of 355 adults (50.1% female; Mage = 29.97, SDage = 12.26 years) from the non-clinical population. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD), the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), and the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits Questionnaire–Short Form (CPM-Q-SF) were administered in both studies, together with the PID-5BF+M algorithm for measuring a common (ICD-11 + DSM-5) six-domain model. Obtained empirical findings generally support our conceptual considerations that the ICD-11 model more comprehensively covered the area of personality pathology than the DSM-5 model, with Anankastia revealed as a more specific domain of personality disorders as well as more cohesively located within the overall personality structure, in comparison to Psychoticism. Moreover, the results corroborated the bipolar relations of Anankastia vs. Disinhibition domains. These results also correspond with the pattern of relationships found in reference to the Big Five domains of normal personality, which were also included in the current research. All our findings were discussed in the context of suggestions for the content and conceptualization of pathological personality traits that flow from the CPM as a comprehensive model of personality structure including both pathological and normal poles of personality dimensions.

Download Full-text

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form: An Examination of Internal Consistency, Factor Structure, and Relationship to Aggression in an Incarcerated Offender Sample

Assessment ◽

10.1177/1073191120916790 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 107319112091679

Author(s):

Ashley L. Dunne ◽

Justin S. Trounson ◽

Jason Skues ◽

Jeff E. Pfeifer ◽

James R. P. Ogloff ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Aggressive Behavior ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Factor Structure ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Personality Characteristics ◽

Male Offenders ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Significant Relationships ◽

Preliminary Support

This study evaluated the internal consistency and factor structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF), and its relationship to aggression in 438 incarcerated Australian male offenders. Results provide support for the internal consistency and five-factor and bifactor structure of the PID-5-BF. The PID-5-BF total score, as well as the domains of Antagonism, Disinhibition, and Negative Affect (low), demonstrated significant relationships with aggression. These results provide preliminary support for the psychometric properties of the PID-5-BF within prison settings, and suggest that a PID-5-BF assessment may be useful within forensic settings to screen for broad maladaptive personality characteristics that are indicative of a greater propensity for aggressive behavior.

Download Full-text

Psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form in Chinese undergraduate students and clinical patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-45917/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Panwen Zhang ◽

Zirong Ouyang ◽

Shulin Fang ◽

Jiayue He ◽

Lejia Fan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Analysis ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Personality Disorders ◽

Measurement Invariance ◽

Undergraduate Students ◽

Factor Model ◽

Clinical Sample ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is a 25-item measuring tool evaluating maladaptive personality traits for the diagnosis of personality disorders(PDs). As a promising scale, its impressive psychometric properties have been verified in some countries, however, there have no studies about the utility of PID-5-BF in Chinese settings. The current study aimed to explore the maladaptive personality factor model which was culturally adapted in China and examine psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Brief Form among Chinese undergraduate students and clinical patients.Methods: 7155 undergraduate students and 451 clinical patients completed the Chinese version of PID-5-BF. 228 students were chosen randomly for test-retest reliability at a 4-week interval. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted to discover the most suitable construct in Chinese, measurement invariance(MI), internal consistency, and external validity were also calculated.Results: An exploratory six-factor model was supported more suitable in both samples(Undergraduate sample: CFI = 0.905, TLI = 0.888, RMSEA = 0.044, SRMR = 0.039; Clinical sample: CFI = 0.904, TLI = 0.886, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.060), adding a new factor“Interpersonal Relationships”. Measurement invariance across non-clinical and clinical sample was established (configural, weak, strong MI, and partial strict MI). Aside from acceptable internal consistency (Undergraduate sample: alpha=0.84, MIC=0.21; Clinical sample: alpha=0.86, MIC=0.19) and test-retest reliability(0.73), the association with 220-item PID-5 was significant(r = 0.93, p < 0.01), and six PDs measured by Personality diagnostic questionnaire-4+ (PDQ-4+) were correlated with expected domains of PID-5-BF.Conclusions: The PID-5-BF is a convenient and useful screening tool for personality disorders with a novel six-factor model in Chinese settings, with the main difference for the Negative Affect domain.

Download Full-text

Personality Inventory for DSM-5--Short Form; Norwegian Version

PsycTESTS Dataset ◽

10.1037/t60114-000 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Jens C. Thimm ◽

Stian Jordan ◽

Bo Bach

Keyword(s):

Short Form ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Norwegian Version

Download Full-text

Psychometric Properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in a Romanian Community Sample

Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies ◽

10.24193/jebp.2021.1.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

pp. 3-20

Author(s):

Ticu CONSTANTIN ◽

Elena G. NICUȚĂ ◽

Diana GRĂDINARU

Keyword(s):

Personality Traits ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Community Sample ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Scoring Methods ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

The Hierarchical Structure ◽

Mean Differences

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) evaluates 25 maladaptive personality traits proposed in the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The questionnaire has been extensively investigated and validated in several languages. The current research sought to examine the psychometric properties of the instrument in a sample of nonclinical Romanian participants (N = 1276). Results indicated excellent internal consistency for the domain level, and very good reliability for the facet level. The assumption of unidimensionality was supported at both the domain and facet levels, apart from Risk Taking. Two domain scoring methods were also compared. One of them takes into consideration all the 25 lower order facets, whereas the other uses only 15 facets. Results show that mean differences across the two scoring methods were small, except for Disinhibition. Moreover, confirmatory factor analyses revealed slightly better fit indices for the model which uses 15 facets only. Lastly, the hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits was explored. Results are discussed in the light of previous literature.

Download Full-text

The psychometric properties of the Hungarian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in a clinical and a community sample

Current Psychology ◽

10.1007/s12144-020-00831-z ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Eszter Labancz ◽

Katalin Balázs ◽

Ildikó Kuritárné Szabó

Keyword(s):

Psychometric Properties ◽

Community Sample ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Hungarian Version

Download Full-text

A comparison of the psychometric properties of the psychopathic personality inventory full-length and short-form versions.

Psychological Assessment ◽

10.1037/a0025832 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 24 (1) ◽

pp. 261-267 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Rebecca M. Kastner ◽

Martin Sellbom ◽

Scott O. Lilienfeld

Keyword(s):

Psychometric Properties ◽

Short Form ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Full Length ◽

Psychopathic Personality ◽

Psychopathic Personality Inventory

Download Full-text

Translation of Big-Five Personality Questionnaire into Turkish and comparing it with Five Factor Personality Inventory Short Form

Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry ◽

10.5455/apd.220580 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Arkun Tatar

Keyword(s):

Big Five ◽

Short Form ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

Big Five Personality ◽

Personality Questionnaire

Download Full-text

Utility of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) in the Measurement of Maladaptive Personality and Psychopathology

Assessment ◽

10.1177/1073191116676889 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 25 (5) ◽

pp. 596-607 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Jaime L. Anderson ◽

Martin Sellbom ◽

Randall T. Salekin

Keyword(s):

Factor Structure ◽

Short Form ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Personality Inventory ◽

External Criterion ◽

Reliability Factor ◽

Dsm 5 ◽

Dimensional Measure ◽

Scale Scores ◽

Personality Psychopathology

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth edition ( DSM-5) Personality and Personality Disorders workgroup developed the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) for the assessment of the alternative trait model for DSM-5. Along with this measure, the American Psychiatric Association published an abbreviated version, the PID-5–Brief form (PID-5-BF). Although this measure is available on the DSM-5 website for use, only two studies have evaluated its psychometric properties and validity and no studies have examined the U.S. version of this measure. The current study evaluated the reliability, factor structure, and construct validity of PID-5-BF scale scores. This included an evaluation of the scales’ associations with Section II PDs, a well-validated dimensional measure of personality psychopathology, and broad externalizing and internalizing psychopathology measures. We found support for the reliability of PID-5-BF scales as well as for the factor structure of the measure. Furthermore, a series of correlation and regression analyses showed conceptually expected associations between PID-5-BF and external criterion variables. Finally, we compared the correlations with external criterion measures to those of the full-length PID-5 and PID-5–Short form. Intraclass correlation analyses revealed a comparable pattern of correlations across all three measures, thereby supporting the use of the PID-5-BF as a screening measure of dimensional maladaptive personality traits.

Download Full-text