Sexual Dysfunction: Common Side Effect

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Marcelle Kaplan
Author(s):  
Masaki Maehara ◽  
Masayasu Sugiyama

Sexual dysfunction (SD) is a common side effect of antipsychotics. The community pharmacist assessed a patient with SD and suggested a change in prescription from risperidone and haloperidol to aripiprazole that improved SD. This is the first report on amelioration of antipsychotic-induced SD by early intervention by community pharmacists.


2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. s227-s228 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Navarro ◽  
L. Perez ◽  
L. Erkoreka ◽  
A. Arroita ◽  
I. Perez

IntroductionSexual function is important for patients’ well-being but it is a common side effect of SSRI and SNRI, included desvenlafaxine.Objectives and aimsEvaluate incidence and characteristics of sexual dysfunction caused by desvenlafaxine in the clinical practice.MethodsOne hundred and thirty-three patients with recently introduced desvenlafaxine treatment are recruited from Barakldo and Uribe-Kosta Mental Health Centres in Biscay, Spain. UKU scale is administered to measure sexual side effects. Statistical analysis is performed using SPSS v.22.ResultsSexual dysfunction is observed in 5 patients (3.7%) at 50 and 100 mg/d (2 and 3 patients, respectively) desvenlafaxine doses. Two patients (1.5%) have experimented more than one sexual side effect. Regarding gender differences, the most frequent sexual dysfunctions are diminished sexual desire (5.5%) and erectile dysfunction (5.5%) in men and orgasmic dysfunction (1.2%) in women (P-values are 0.034; 0.034 and 0.408, respectively). Discontinuation is decided in 60% of patients.ConclusionsDesvenlafaxine has a well-tolerated sexual side effect profile in general population. There are some gender-related differences both in presentation and perception, as it has been described with other drugs, and this should be taken into account by prescriptors.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Author(s):  
Meghan J Chenoweth ◽  
Caryn Lerman ◽  
Jo Knight ◽  
Rachel F Tyndale

Abstract Introduction Varenicline is the most efficacious smoking cessation treatment, however long-term cessation rates tend to be <25%. Nausea, the most common side effect of varenicline, observed in ~28% of individuals treated, peaks early following treatment initiation and reduces cessation success. Genetic variation influences treatment response, however genetic contributors to individual differences in side effects are less understood. Methods We conducted a genome-wide association study of nausea incidence at one week following the initiation of varenicline treatment (corresponding to the target quit date) in 189 cigarette smokers of European ancestry (NCT01314001). Additive genetic models examining the likelihood of experiencing any versus no nausea controlled for population substructure, age, and sex. Variants with minor allele frequencies (MAF) ≥ 10% were considered. Results Fifty-seven (30.2%) out of 189 participants reported nausea. The top variant associated with nausea was rs1568209 (OR=2.61 for A vs. G allele; 95% CI=1.65,4.15; P=2.1e-7; MAF=48.7%), mapping to the SLCO3A1 drug transporter gene on chromosome 15. In the same trial, rs1568209 was not associated with nausea in either the nicotine patch (P=0.56; n=181) or placebo (P=0.59; n=174) arms. In varenicline-treated smokers, the incidence of nausea was higher in females (44.6%; n=74) versus males (20.9%; n=115) (P=0.001), however there was no evidence of a difference in the influence of rs1568209 on nausea between the sexes (P for sex*genotype interaction=0.36). Future studies in larger samples are required to test the robustness of this finding. Conclusions Variation in SLCO3A1 may influence the risk for developing nausea in varenicline-treated smokers, which may alter adherence and cessation. Implications Varenicline-associated nausea reduces adherence and limits cessation success. Previous candidate gene association studies showed genetic factors influence nausea on varenicline. This pilot genome-wide investigation of nausea, the most common side effect associated with varenicline treatment and an importance cause of treatment discontinuation, suggests the potential involvement of common variation in the SLCO3A1 drug transporter gene.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 6-9
Author(s):  
Anecita Fadol

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gizachew Kassahun ◽  
Getachew Moges ◽  
Yitayew Demessie

An epileptic seizure is a clinical event presumed to result from an abnormal and excessive neuronal discharge. The clinical symptoms are paroxysmal and may include impaired consciousness and motor, sensory, autonomic, or psychic events perceived by the subject or an observer. Epilepsy occurs when 2 or more epileptic seizures occur unprovoked by any immediately identifiable cause. And in the majority of patients with epilepsy, antiepileptic drugs effectively control their illness. However, more than 30% of people with epilepsy do not attain full seizure control, even with the best available treatment regimen. The aim of this study is to assess self-reported adherence in adult patients with epilepsy and to identify potential barriers for nonadherence to antiepileptic drug treatment in Dessie Referral Hospital. A hospital based cross-sectional study was conducted using structured questionnaires including Morisky medication adherence scale and analysis was conducted descriptively using SPSS version 20. The level of nonadherence to antiepileptic medication regimens was 34.1%. The major reason for missing medication was forgetfulness 53.5%. And the most common side effect was sedation 56.2%. Conclusion. Majority of epileptic patients in Dessie Referral Hospital was adherent to their AEDs treatment and among the determinants of adherence assessed the level of education and the side effect of drugs showed statistical significance.


1998 ◽  
Vol 13 (S1) ◽  
pp. 23s-30s ◽  
Author(s):  
J Peuskens ◽  
P Sienaert ◽  
M De Hert

SummaryAlthough only a few studies have been performed and published data are scarce, it seems clear that sexual dysfunctions frequently occur during treatment with antipsychotics in 30–60% of patients with schizophrenia. It is important to evaluate the occurrence of sexual dysfunction and its relation to antipsychotic treatment.


2014 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. S161-S162
Author(s):  
Vivien Landre ◽  
Richard Knight ◽  
Gerry Melino ◽  
Alexey Antonov

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramzie Nendra Diansyah ◽  
Johan Renaldo ◽  
Wahjoe Djatisoesanto ◽  
Lukman Hakim

Objective: This study was aimed to compare the efficacy and side effect of silodosin 8mg once daily and silodosin 4mg twice daily in BPH-LUTS patients after 4 and 12 weeks. Material & Methods: Single blind randomized controlled trials in 60 male patients aged ≥45 years with BPH-LUTS from July 2017 to October 2017 was divided into groups who received 8mg of silodosin once daily and those who received 4mg of silodosin twice daily. Efficacy and adverse events were evaluated after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. Results:  There was no significant difference of mean age of the two groups was 67.93 ± 6.49 years and 69.07 ± 6.28 years respectively (p 0.49). Both doses of this drug decreased the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and significantly increased the maximum urinary flow (Qmax) (p<0.05) but there was no significant differences between the two groups (p>0.05). Ejaculation disorder was the most common side effect in all groups (6.7% and 5%) and there was no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: The administration of 8mg of once daily silodosin has similar efficacy as 4mg twice daily silodosin. There were no adverse events differences in the two groups. Ejaculation disorder is the most common adverse event of silodosin administration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s849-s849 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Gómez Sánchez-Lafuente ◽  
R. Reina Gonzalez ◽  
M. Hernandez Abellán

IntroductionMood stabilizers can cause many side effects. Although many of these are well known, like thyroid and renal failure after taking lithium, sexual dysfunction side effects remains unclear.MethodsWe made a systematic computerized literature search of clinical studies using MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and Trip for clinical studies of sexual dysfunction published up to December 2015.ResultsOnly eight relevant papers were identified. All of them studied lithium sexual dysfunction in bipolar disorder patients. Valproic acid, carbamazepine and lamotrigine were not studied in patients with bipolar disorder. Nevertheless, the three were studied in epilepsy. Clinical reports usually used Arizona Sexual Experience Scale or Psychotropic Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire to measure sexual dysfunction and Brief Adherence Rating Scale to measure medication adherence. They suggest lithium could decrease desire and sexual thoughts, worse arousal and cause orgasm dysfunction. In overall, those patients with sexual dysfunction had lower level of functioning and poor compliance. Taking benzodiazepines during lithium treatment may increase the risk of sexual dysfunction even more.ConclusionThere are few studies that focus on mood stabilizers sexual dysfunction. This inevitably entails a number of limitations. First, the small sample size and, in some studies, the relative short period of follow-up may underestimate the results. Besides, practical management was not treated in any study. Actually, handling this side effect have not been well established.To conclude, this revision suggest that approximately 30% patients receiving lithium experience this side effect, and it is associated with poor medication adherence.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-419
Author(s):  
GERALD B. HICKSON

In Reply.— The purpose of our paper was to examine the question of safety concerning over-the-counter (OTC) release of promethazine.1 Our stated opinion, that the drug is not appropriate for OTC release, was based on more than a suggested relationship with SIDS, but also on the drug's common side effect of sedation, ability to act as a cerebral stimulant even in therapeutic doses inducing hallucinations, convulsions and encephalopathy in some children, case reports concerning promethazine use and apparent life-threatening events, the potential for families to misuse this drug due to its sedative and antiemetic properties, and most importantly, FDA standards of safety for OTC medications which require "a low potential for harm which may result from abuse under conditions of wide spread availability."2


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document