Forecasting reservoir performance by mapping seismic emissions

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. T451-T459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Sicking ◽  
Jan Vermilye ◽  
Ashley Yaner
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Seismic Waves ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Great Promise ◽  
Production Volume ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Fracture Systems ◽  
Over Time

Streaming depth imaging (SDI) is a modified version of Kirchhoff migration that images the intensity and distribution of weak seismic waves emitted from rocks at depth. These images reveal the locations of the fractures and fracture networks in the reservoir. SDI allows for more informed forecasts for drilling, hydraulic fracturing, and reservoir management than is provided by traditional microearthquake mapping methods. Using passive data from surface and near-surface geophone grids, SDI integrates the seismic emissions over time to form the fracture activity volume. The fracture systems and the active production volume (APV) of the reservoir are calculated from this activity volume. In situ wellbore measurements indicate that the preexisting fracture systems in the reservoir rocks have substantial impact on the placement of the fluids during the hydraulic fracture treatment. They also strongly influence the locations of maximum oil and gas production and the decline rates of resource production. Mapping the fracture systems in the reservoir before drilling provides a strong forecasting value for optimal production sites for well placement. SDI can forecast hydraulic fracturing performance and improve the estimates of resource production volumes. Mapping the activity volumes during hydraulic fracturing shows the placement of the fluids during the treatment. SDI helps forecast the locations along the well that will have the best production. Time lapse mapping of the APV periodically during production shows the zones that are producing fluids and how they change over time. Our case histories indicate that this new seismic method has great promise for improved management of unconventional resources.

scholarly journals Perspectives for use of hydraulic fracturing in oil and gas production

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Mouallem ◽  
Wilson Trigueiro de Sousa ◽  
Ivo Eyer Cabral ◽  
Adilson Curi
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Environmental Impacts ◽  
Groundwater Level ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Gas Extraction ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
High Productivity ◽  
Oil Exploitation ◽  
The World

Hydraulic fracturing emerges currently, all over the world, as one of the more strategic techniques used by companies in the oil exploitation sector. This technique is characterized by its high productivity and profit in relation to conventional methods of hydrocarbon exploitation. However, in many countries, as is the case of Brazil, there are several divergences considering the employment of this methodology. Many renowned researchers attest that there are several irreversible environmental impacts generated by the use of this methodology. Among the main environmental impacts are the risk of groundwater level contamination, the risk of surface subsidence, and the risk of the environment contamination with fluids used in the process of the oil and gas extraction.

Simultaneous Hydraulic Fracturing Improves Completion Efficiency and Lowers Costs Per Foot

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Russell ◽  
Price Stark ◽  
Sean Owens ◽  
Awais Navaiz ◽  
Russell Lockman
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Horizontal Wells ◽  
Asset Returns ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Well Performance ◽  
Additional Time ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Single Well ◽  
Lateral Length

Abstract Reducing well costs in unconventional development while maintaining or improving production continues to be important to the success of operators. Generally, the primary drivers for oil and gas production are treatment fluid volume, proppant mass, and the number of stages or intervals along the well. Increasing these variables typically results in increased costs, causing additional time and complexity to complete these larger designs. Simultaneously completing two wells using the same volumes, rates, and number of stages as for any previous single well, allows for more lateral length or volume completed per day. This paper presents the necessary developments and outcomes of a completion technique utilizing a single hydraulic fracturing spread to simultaneously stimulate two or more horizontal wells. The goal of this technique is to increase operational efficiency, lower completion cost, and reduce the time from permitting a well to production of that well—without negatively impacting the primary drivers of well performance. To date this technique has been successfully performed in both the Bakken and Permian basins in more than 200 wells, proving its success can translate to other unconventional fields and operations. Ultimately, over 200 wells were successfully completed simultaneously, resulting in a 45% increase in completion speed and significant decrease in completion costs, while still maintaining equivalent well performance. This type of simultaneous completion scenario continues to be implemented and improved upon to improve asset returns.

scholarly journals Comment on “The intensification of the water footprint of hydraulic fracturing”

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (8) ◽  
pp. eaav2110
Author(s):  
Daniel Raimi
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
Water Consumption ◽  
Energy Production ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Water Footprint ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Permian Basin ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Oil And Natural Gas ◽  
Water Intensity

Kondash et al. provide a valuable contribution to our understanding of water consumption and wastewater production from oil and gas production using hydraulic fracturing. Unfortunately, their claim that the water intensity of energy production using hydraulic fracturing has increased in all regions is incorrect. More comprehensive data show that, while the water intensity of production may have increased in regions such as the Permian basin, it has decreased by 74% in the Marcellus and by 19% in the Eagle Ford region. This error likely stems from an improper method for estimating energy production from wells: The authors use the median well to represent regional production, which systematically underestimates aggregate production volumes. Across all regions, aggregate data suggest that the water intensity of oil and natural gas production using hydraulic fracturing has increased by 19%. There also appears to be an error in estimates for water consumption in the Permian basin.

Simultaneous microseismic event localization and source mechanism determination

Geophysics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. KS1-KS9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksana Zhebel ◽  
Leo Eisner
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Microseismic Monitoring ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Source Mechanism ◽  
Seismic Events ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Microseismic Event

Microseismic monitoring has become a tool of choice for the development and optimization of oil and gas production from unconventional reservoirs. The primary objective of (micro) seismic monitoring includes localization of (micro) seismic events and characterization of their source mechanisms. Most seismic events are of a nonexplosive nature, and thus, there are waveform (polarity) differences among receivers. Specifically, double-couple sources represented a challenge for migration-based localization techniques. We developed and applied a new migration-type location technique combined with source mechanism inversion that allowed for constructive interference of signal in seismic waveforms. The procedure included constructing image functions by stacking the amplitudes with compensated polarity changes. The compensation weights were calculated by using moment tensor inversion. This method did not require any picking of arrivals at individual receivers, but it required receivers to be distributed in multiple azimuths and offsets. This made the technique suitable for surface or near-surface monitoring, in which a low signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) can be overcome by stacking. Furthermore, the advantage of this technique was that in addition to the position in time and space, we also determined the source mechanism. We determined with numerical tests that the proposed technique can be used for detection and location of events with S/Ns as low as 0.05 at individual (prestacked) receivers. Furthermore, we found that other source mechanism parameters such as magnitude, volumetric, or shear components of the source mechanism were not suitable for the location. Finally, we applied the proposed technique to a microseismic event of moment magnitude [Formula: see text] induced during the hydraulic fracturing treatment of a gas shale reservoir in North America.

Experimental Study on the Wall Factor for Rod-Shaped Proppant Settling in Vertical Fracture

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhaopeng Zhu ◽  
Xianzhi Song ◽  
Xuezhe Yao ◽  
Shuo Zhu ◽  
Silin Jing
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Hydraulic Fracturing ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Transport Distance ◽  
Fracture Closure ◽  
Settling Process

Abstract Hydraulic fracturing is an important technology to improve oil and gas production. In recent years, rod-shaped proppant has received increasing attention for its advantages in avoiding fracture closure and enhancing conductivity. Due to its special shape, the settling process in the fracture is more complicated than that of a spherical proppant. Accurate description of the wall factor of fracture on the settling rod-shaped proppant is pivotal in predicting the transport distance of rod-shaped proppant and improving the effect of fracturing. However, few researches have been reported about the fracture wall factor on the settling rod-shaped proppant. In this study, the transparent fracture model with different width and a high-speed camera were used to record the settling process of the rod-shaped proppant in the fracture. A total of 215 tests were carried out to analyze the effects of fluid properties, the equivalent dimensionless diameter, sphericity, and Reynolds number on the wall factor, involving the ranges of the equivalent dimensionless diameter and the particle Reynolds number are 0.03 to 1.47 and 0.03–1354.14, respectively. The settling processes of rod-shaped proppant under horizontal and vertical states were studied, and two wall factor models for the two states were established, respectively. The results show that the wall factor is a function of both the equivalent dimensionless diameter and Reynolds number. Finally, the prediction models of wall factor with the prediction error of 1.70 and 4.44% are established for these two Reynolds number regions, respectively. The results of this study can further improve the performance of rod-shaped proppant in hydraulic fracturing.

scholarly journals Avoiding pitfalls in shallow seismic reflection surveys

Geophysics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 1213-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don W. Steeples ◽  
Richard D. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Reflection ◽  
Seismic Waves ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Digital Processing ◽  
Petroleum Exploration ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Surface Reflection ◽  
Oil And Gas Exploration ◽  
Reflection Data ◽  
Shallow Seismic

Acquiring shallow reflection data requires the use of high frequencies, preferably accompanied by broad bandwidths. Problems that sometimes arise with this type of seismic information include spatial aliasing of ground roll, erroneous interpretation of processed airwaves and air‐coupled waves as reflected seismic waves, misinterpretation of refractions as reflections on stacked common‐midpoint (CMP) sections, and emergence of processing artifacts. Processing and interpreting near‐surface reflection data correctly often requires more than a simple scaling‐down of the methods used in oil and gas exploration or crustal studies. For example, even under favorable conditions, separating shallow reflections from shallow refractions during processing may prove difficult, if not impossible. Artifacts emanating from inadequate velocity analysis and inaccurate static corrections during processing are at least as troublesome when they emerge on shallow reflection sections as they are on sections typical of petroleum exploration. Consequently, when using shallow seismic reflection, an interpreter must be exceptionally careful not to misinterpret as reflections those many coherent waves that may appear to be reflections but are not. Evaluating the validity of a processed, shallow seismic reflection section therefore requires that the interpreter have access to at least one field record and, ideally, to copies of one or more of the intermediate processing steps to corroborate the interpretation and to monitor for artifacts introduced by digital processing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document