scholarly journals Why indeed? Invited commentary on… Why aren't depot antipsychotics prescribed more often and what can be done about it?

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. E. Barnes

A recent review concluded that replicated, evidence-based studies have demonstrated several areas of advantage for long-acting antipsychotics over oral antipsychotics. These include improved global outcome and reduced risk of rehospitalisation, psychopharmacological benefits such as more consistent bioavailabilty and more predictable dose–blood level correlations, an improved pharmacokinetic profile allowing lower dosages to be used with a consequent reduced likelihood of side-effects, and a reduced burden of care when injections are required only every 2–6 weeks (Robert & Geppert, 2004). Further, if a patient relapses despite receiving uninterrupted depot treatment, this indicates the need to consider reasons for deterioration other than poor adherence. However, perhaps the critical advantage over oral preparations is the avoidance of covert non-adherence (Barnes & Curson, 1994). With depot treatment, any decision by the patient not to continue medication will be signalled by failure to attend for, or refusal of, injection. The clinical team can therefore act to intervene appropriately, bearing in mind that non-adherence may be both a cause and consequence of worsening of illness. Lastly, with depot preparations the risk of self-poisoning is reduced.

2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. X. PATEL ◽  
V. NIKOLAOU ◽  
A. S. DAVID

Background. Maintenance antipsychotic medication is the mainstay of relapse prevention in patients with schizophrenia. Long acting depot antipsychotics were developed to promote treatment adherence and yet their utilization is variable, perhaps due to negative attitudes of both patients and psychiatrists. Recently, a shift away from depots has occurred, in favour of the newer atypical oral antipsychotics.Method. This study investigated the current attitudes and knowledge concerning depots, with a newly designed questionnaire, in a cross-sectional postal survey of qualified psychiatrists working in south-east England.Results. A substantial minority of psychiatrists believe that depots are old fashioned (40%), stigmatizing (48%) and are associated with more side-effects than typical oral antipsychotics (38%). Many believe that depots are as efficacious as oral medication (91%) but are less acceptable to patients (69%) and relatives (66%). A large majority consider depots enhance patient compliance (81%) and prevent relapse (94%). Psychiatrists would be persuaded to prescribe depots if they were associated with fewer side-effects, in patients where compliance is an issue, and if atypical depot antipsychotics were available, presumably because they would have a lower incidence of side-effects. Additionally, psychiatrists' knowledge about depots was positively associated with attitudes. More favourable patient-centred attitudes were reported by psychiatrists with higher depot use.Conclusion. Practising psychiatrists have several strongly endorsed attitudes towards depot medication that are associated with knowledge and prescribing habits. By updating psychiatrists' knowledge about depots, in turn their attitudes may become more positive and prescribing practices may subsequently change.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-344
Author(s):  
Ketan Dipak Jethwa

SummaryAkathisia is a common and distressing side-effect of antipsychotic medication. The treatment of this condition is difficult and options are limited. This review of the literature was performed to develop an evidence-based algorithm for the management of antipsychotic-induced akathisia. There is limited high-level evidence to support the use of anticholinergics. Centrally acting β-adrenergic antagonists are potential treatments, although their use is limited by troublesome side-effects. Long-acting benzodiazepines and mirtazapine are potential well-tolerated treatments for the acute management of akathisia.


2014 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. S370-S371
Author(s):  
Marte Swart ◽  
Marrit de Boer ◽  
Durk Wiersma ◽  
Robert Schoevers ◽  
Henderikus Knegtering

1961 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lauritzen ◽  
Semih Velibese

ABSTRACT A description is given of experimental investigations and preliminary clinical experience with the long-acting oestriol compound polyoestriol phosphate – a water-soluble polymere of oestriol and phosphoric acid. The compound seems to exert all the physiologically important effects of oestriol. Even with high doses the hormone causes no proliferation of the endometrium and no withdrawal bleeding. It has no untoward effect on metabolism. It decreases slightly the cholesterol concentration (to the extent of ⅓–⅕ of the effect produced by long-acting oestradiol esters). The compound has a wide therapeutic range. No side-effects have been observed. Doses of 10 mg or more have a prolonged duration. Additional prolongation of the effect is largely dependent on dosage. To ensure an effect lasting for 4 weeks 40 mg polyoestriol phosphate (corresponding with 30 mg oestriol) is required – an amount which roughly corresponds with physiological quantitative data. The compound, which involves an interesting new principle of prolongation, was most effectively used in the treatment of menopausal symptoms and genital organic disorders. For these indications it can be recommended without reservation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khadije Saket ◽  
Jalil T. Afshari ◽  
Ehsan Saburi ◽  
Mahdi Yousefi ◽  
Roshanak Salari

From ancient times, medicinal plants have been usually utilized to treat many disorders, but today, interest in these herbs is again aroused, because of their fewer side effects and low-cost. In traditional medicine, for many diseases, various medicinal herbs have been suggested so far. Drimia maritime, also named squill, is an important medicinal plant for the treatment of many diseases, especially respiratory diseases. In the current evidence-based study, we conducted a review of the general characteristics, ingredients, administration form, and side effects of squill in traditional medicine. For this purpose, traditional Persian medicine literatures and electronic databases were examined including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Many compounds are isolated from D.maritima, including scillaren, scillirubroside, scillarenin, and bufadienolide glycosides. Oxymel is the most commonly used form of squill for various diseases, especially respiratory diseases. Besides, squill has been used in the treatment of cardiovascular, digestive, and dermatological disorders, it is also used against various cancer cells for its antioxidant and cytotoxic properties. Moreover, there is relatively reliable evidence of its benefits for bacterial and helminthic infections, rheumatism, edema, gout, abortion induction, healing of wounds and urine induction. It seems that supplementary studies are required to explore the bioactive agents and their effective mechanisms.


Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Sara Silva ◽  
António J. Almeida ◽  
Nuno Vale

Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects around ten million people worldwide and is considered the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer’s disease. In addition, there is a higher risk incidence in the elderly population. The main PD hallmarks include the loss of dopaminergic neurons and the development of Lewy bodies. Unfortunately, motor symptoms only start to appear when around 50–70% of dopaminergic neurons have already been lost. This particularly poses a huge challenge for early diagnosis and therapeutic effectiveness. Actually, pharmaceutical therapy is able to relief motor symptoms, but as the disease progresses motor complications and severe side-effects start to appear. In this review, we explore the research conducted so far in order to repurpose drugs for PD with the use of nanodelivery systems, alternative administration routes, and nanotheranostics. Overall, studies have demonstrated great potential for these nanosystems to target the brain, improve drug pharmacokinetic profile, and decrease side-effects.


Author(s):  
R Segarra ◽  
M Recio-Barbero ◽  
M Sáenz-Herrero ◽  
O Mentxaka ◽  
J Cabezas-Garduño ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) may be a suitable therapeutic option for those patients in earlier stages of psychosis to avoid relapses and disease progression. Despite that, there is a lack of evidence in the literature regarding the use of LAIs in this profile of patients. Methods This is a retrospective cohort analysis to assess the efficacy, tolerability, and pattern of use of palmitate paliperidone long-acting injectable (PPLAI) formulations (1-monthly and 3-monthly) compared to oral paliperidone/risperidone in patients with a non-affective First Psychotic Episode(FEP) over a 12-month follow-up. Relevant sociodemographic and clinical information were assessed as well as main clinical scales: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP), and Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI-I and CGI-S). Results Forty-eight patients, 16 per arm, 20-50 year aged with a FEP were included. Significant improvements were registered for all treatment groups. Despite that, patients receiving PPLAI 1-monthly and PPLAI 3-monthly formulations obtained greater improvements than the oral group in the main domains assessed (p<0.001). We found no statistically significant differences in hospitalizations between groups. Side effects were presented in 24% of patients. A trend towards reducing antipsychotic doses was observed in 43.8% of patients to achieve the minimum effective dose and avoid the occurrence of side effects. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study assessing the use of palmitate paliperidone long-acting formulations versus oral risperidone or paliperidone in FEP. Treatment with PPLAI formulations seems to be an effective therapeutic choice at earlier stages of the disease.


Author(s):  
Maria Alice Franzoi ◽  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
Marta Perachino ◽  
Lucia Del Mastro ◽  
Evandro de Azambuja ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15
Author(s):  
Łukasz Hajac ◽  
Martyna Hajac ◽  
Adam Maciejczyk

Nausea and vomiting are one of most frequent side effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Effective prevention and treatment of these symptoms is essential for better quality of life for patients undergoing oncological therapies. Nausea and vomiting can be acute, delayed or anticipatory. Leading mechanisms and methods of treatment are different for each of those. Most often used groups of drugs are: 5-HT3-antagonists, glucocorticosteroids, NK1-antagonists. Another important group are neuroleptics, which are therapy of choice for anticipatory vomiting. Modern antiemetic medications are in most cases safe and effective. But as every treatment it causes risks of adverse events which may be serious and difficult to manage. It applies in particular to long-acting drugs. Most common side effects are headache, constipation and sedation. But more severe or life-threatening symptoms may appear, like intestinal obstruction and serotonin syndrome. Some of the drugs also come with risk of interacting with other treatment. Changes in pharmacokinetics may lead to additional toxicities. In elderly, especially with cardiac disease, in risk of ileus or cachexia these drugs shall be used with caution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document