Combination chemotherapy using adriamycin, DTIC, cyclophosphamide, and actinomycin D for advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized comparative trial. A phase III, Southwest Oncology Group Study (7613).

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 851-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
L H Baker ◽  
J Frank ◽  
G Fine ◽  
S P Balcerzak ◽  
R L Stephens ◽  
...  

The term soft tissue sarcoma refers to a large variety of malignant tumors arising in extraskeletal connective tissues that connect, support, and surround discrete anatomic structures. All visceral organs also contain a connective stroma that can undergo malignant transformation. Because of the histological similarities of this group of tumors and their relative rarity, treatment prescriptions for patients that have disseminated disease are most often uniform. In this study, we asked the question whether adding a third drug (cyclophosphamide or actinomycin D) to Adriamycin (Adr [Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH])-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)- imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC) would improve the response rate and/or survival. A unique feature of this cooperative group clinical trial was the mandatory pathology review of the histological material. All patients of the Southwest Oncology Group between June 1, 1976, and November 17, 1979, who had a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of a soft tissue sarcoma with convincing clinical or biopsy-documented evidence of metastatic disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized to receive (1) Adr, 60 mg/m2 intravenously, day 1, and DTIC, 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (104 patients); (2) Adr and DTIC as in (1) and cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2, day 1 (112 patients); or (3) Adr and DTIC as in (1) and actinomycin D, 1.2 mg/m2, day 1, (119 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in response rates (33%, 34%, and 24%) (P = .25). Median durations of response were 31 weeks in the Adr-DTIC arm, 26 weeks in the cyclophosphamide-DTIC-Adr arm, and 23 weeks in the Adr-DTIC-Actinomycin D arm (P = .78). Median durations of survival were 37, 42, and 50 weeks, respectively. Again, no statistically significant differences were observed (P = .59). Toxicities from each of these treatment arms were formidable and were equivalent. Prognostic factor analysis showed a prognosis based on bone marrow reserve, sex, and pathology subtype favorable to patients.

Author(s):  
Kunhi Mohammed K. P. ◽  
Snehasis Pradhan ◽  
Supratim Bhattacharyya ◽  
Prafulla Kumar Das ◽  
Muhammed Navas N. K.

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin that comprise less than 1 percent of all adult malignancies. Although they occur anywhere in the body, they involve most commonly in extremities, trunk, retroperitoneum and head and neck. The aim of the study was to analyze clinical and histopathological features of various soft tissue sarcomas.Methods: This was a retrospective study, conducted in tertiary cancer centre in Odisha during the period 2015 to 2018. We collected clinical parameters like age, sex, site of swelling, any associated pain and biopsy reports and these variables were correlated with final histopathology reports.Results: A total of 107 patients were included in the study, with male to female ratio of 2:1(71 and 36) and average age of 43.45 years. All of them presented with a swelling. The lower extremities were the most common sites i.e. 44.62%. Pleomorphic sarcoma was the most frequent histologic variety comprising 43% and less frequent variety were angiosarcoma, and myxoid sarcoma.Conclusions: Soft tissue sarcoma are predominant in males and middle aged population are frequently affected. Most common affected site is lower extremity and pleomorphic sarcoma is the prominent histologic type.


2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 665-671
Author(s):  
Gerame Wells ◽  
Robert C.G. Martin ◽  
Kelly M. Mcmasters ◽  
Charles R. Scoggins

Soft tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that arise from mesenchymal tissues. The majority of these tumors arise on the extremity or trunk. Despite their rarity, soft tissue sarcomas continue to generate vigorous academic interest, and as a result, the ever-expanding medical literature dealing with sarcomas continues to grow. Many general surgeons will see few of these tumors during their careers, and a review of the current literature and how it applies to patients afflicted with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity or trunk is warranted.


2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 2081-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap Verweij ◽  
Siow Ming Lee ◽  
Wlodzimir Ruka ◽  
Jose Buesa ◽  
Robert Coleman ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor response and time to progression (TTP) with docetaxel compared with doxorubicin in first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable soft tissue sarcoma lesions and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were entered onto the study. They were randomized to either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 given as a bolus injection every 3 weeks. A maximum of seven cycles of treatment were scheduled. The study was designed as a randomized phase III study evaluating TTP by log-rank model. There was a clause for premature closure of the trial if fewer than five responses were observed among the first 25 assessable patients in the docetaxel treatment arm. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were entered onto the study; 85 were assessable for toxicity and 83 for response. The rate of severe granulocytopenia was not significantly different between the two arms. Nausea (P = .001), vomiting (P < .001), and stomatitis (P = .005) were more common with doxorubicin therapy, whereas neurotoxicity was more frequent with docetaxel treatment. The response rate to doxorubicin therapy was 30% (95% confidence interval, 17% to 46%), whereas no responses to docetaxel therapy were seen (P < .001). In view of this, the trial was closed prematurely and the phase III study part was not conducted. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is inactive in soft tissue sarcomas and cannot be recommended for further use in treatment of this disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Daniel Alexander Reikher ◽  
Mark Feldman

Clinical manifestations of cancer can be categorized as resulting from direct tissue injury from the primary tumor, distant metastatic spread, or aberrant biological activity, also known as a paraneoplastic syndrome. Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare group of malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin which typically present with direct tissue injury, exerting their harmful potential by compression and mass effect. We describe a rare case of an occult retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma presenting with marantic endocarditis. To date, there is a paucity of available medical literature relating sarcoma to marantic endocarditis.


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 2058-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vernon K. Sondak ◽  
P.-Y. Liu ◽  
Ralph J. Tuthill ◽  
Raymond A. Kempf ◽  
Joseph M. Unger ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Patients with clinically negative nodes constitute over 85% of new melanoma cases. There is no adjuvant therapy for intermediate-thickness, node-negative melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Southwest Oncology Group conducted a randomized phase III trial of an allogeneic melanoma vaccine for 2 years versus observation in patients with intermediate-thickness (1.5 to 4.0 mm or Clark’s level IV if thickness unknown), clinically or pathologically node-negative melanoma (T3N0M0). RESULTS: Six hundred eighty-nine patients were accrued over 4.5 years; 89 patients (13%) were ineligible. Surgical node staging was performed in 24%, the remainder were clinical N0. Thirteen eligible patients refused assigned treatment: seven on the observation arm and six on the vaccine arm. Most vaccine patients experienced mild to moderate local toxicity, but 26 (9%) experienced grade 3 toxicity. After a median follow-up of 5.6 years, there were 107 events (tumor recurrences or deaths) among the 300 eligible patients randomized to vaccine compared with 114 among the 300 eligible patients randomized to observation (hazard ratio, 0.92; Cox-adjusted P2 = 0.51). There was no difference in vaccine efficacy among patients with tumors ≤ 3 mm or > 3 mm. CONCLUSION: This represents one of the largest randomized, controlled trials of adjuvant vaccine therapy in human cancer reported to date. Compliance with randomization was excellent, with only 2% refusing assigned therapy. There is no evidence of improved disease-free survival among patients randomized to receive vaccine, although the power to detect a small but clinically significant difference was low. Future investigations of adjuvant vaccine approaches for patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma should involve larger numbers of patients and ideally should include sentinel node biopsy staging.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (32) ◽  
pp. 3898-3905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher W. Ryan ◽  
Ofer Merimsky ◽  
Mark Agulnik ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Scott M. Schuetze ◽  
...  

Purpose Palifosfamide is the active metabolite of ifosfamide and does not require prodrug activation, thereby avoiding the generation of toxic metabolites. The PICASSO III trial compared doxorubicin plus palifosfamide with doxorubicin plus placebo in patients who had received no prior systemic therapy for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 intravenously day 1 plus palifosfamide 150 mg/m2/d intravenously days 1 to 3 or doxorubicin plus placebo once every 21 days for up to six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiologic review. Results In all, 447 patients were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin plus palifosfamide (n = 226) or doxorubicin plus placebo (n = 221). Median PFS was 6.0 months for doxorubicin plus palifosfamide and 5.2 months for doxorubicin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.08; P = .19). Median overall survival was 15.9 months for doxorubicin plus palifosfamide and 16.9 months for doxorubicin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.39; P = .74). There was a higher incidence of grade 3 to 4 adverse events in the doxorubicin plus palifosfamide arm (63.6% v 50.9%) including a higher rate of febrile neutropenia (21.4% v 12.6%). Conclusion No significant difference in PFS was observed in patients receiving doxorubicin plus palifosfamide compared with those receiving doxorubicin plus placebo. The observed median PFS and overall survival in this large, international study can serve as a benchmark for future studies of doxorubicin in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.


Cancer ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 770-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret von Mehren ◽  
Cathryn Rankin ◽  
John R. Goldblum ◽  
George D. Demetri ◽  
Vivien Bramwell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-359
Author(s):  
Raghav Yelamanchi ◽  
Parikshith Manjunath ◽  
Nikhil Gupta ◽  
CK Durga

Scalp soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are very rare accounting for less than 0.1% of all malignancies. We report a rare clinical image of advanced stage soft tissue sarcoma of the scalp. A 65 year woman had presented to the surgical department with complaints of a rapidly growing swelling over the scalp for three months. On examination there was huge 20 x 20 cm swelling over the scalp in the left temporoparietal region with variegated consistency. Computed tomography of head revealed a large soft tissue mass with necrosis invading the bone and underlying brain parenchyma. Histopathological finding from core needle biopsy revealed pleomorphic sarcoma. STS are highly malignant tumors which should be diagnosed and treated using multimodality approach. Recurrences are common even after complete resection and prognosis is poor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document