scholarly journals Giant Soft Tissue Sarcoma of Scalp with Skull and Cerebral Invasion

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-359
Author(s):  
Raghav Yelamanchi ◽  
Parikshith Manjunath ◽  
Nikhil Gupta ◽  
CK Durga
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Brain Parenchyma ◽  
Clinical Image ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Surgical Department ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Multimodality Approach

Scalp soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are very rare accounting for less than 0.1% of all malignancies. We report a rare clinical image of advanced stage soft tissue sarcoma of the scalp. A 65 year woman had presented to the surgical department with complaints of a rapidly growing swelling over the scalp for three months. On examination there was huge 20 x 20 cm swelling over the scalp in the left temporoparietal region with variegated consistency. Computed tomography of head revealed a large soft tissue mass with necrosis invading the bone and underlying brain parenchyma. Histopathological finding from core needle biopsy revealed pleomorphic sarcoma. STS are highly malignant tumors which should be diagnosed and treated using multimodality approach. Recurrences are common even after complete resection and prognosis is poor.

scholarly journals Clinicopathological study of soft tissue sarcoma-retrospective study of tertiary cancer institute in eastern India

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 4075
Author(s):  
Kunhi Mohammed K. P. ◽  
Snehasis Pradhan ◽  
Supratim Bhattacharyya ◽  
Prafulla Kumar Das ◽  
Muhammed Navas N. K.
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
The Body ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma ◽  
Frequent Variety ◽  
Male To Female

Background: Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin that comprise less than 1 percent of all adult malignancies. Although they occur anywhere in the body, they involve most commonly in extremities, trunk, retroperitoneum and head and neck. The aim of the study was to analyze clinical and histopathological features of various soft tissue sarcomas.Methods: This was a retrospective study, conducted in tertiary cancer centre in Odisha during the period 2015 to 2018. We collected clinical parameters like age, sex, site of swelling, any associated pain and biopsy reports and these variables were correlated with final histopathology reports.Results: A total of 107 patients were included in the study, with male to female ratio of 2:1(71 and 36) and average age of 43.45 years. All of them presented with a swelling. The lower extremities were the most common sites i.e. 44.62%. Pleomorphic sarcoma was the most frequent histologic variety comprising 43% and less frequent variety were angiosarcoma, and myxoid sarcoma.Conclusions: Soft tissue sarcoma are predominant in males and middle aged population are frequently affected. Most common affected site is lower extremity and pleomorphic sarcoma is the prominent histologic type.

Evaluation of a Soft Tissue Mass in the Extremity or Trunk

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C Thomas ◽  
Dale Han
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Physical Examination ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Mass ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Needle Tract

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) represents a diverse group of malignant tumors derived from mesenchymal elements. Evaluation of a soft tissue mass of the trunk or extremity starts with a detailed history and physical examination, which will help guide further diagnostic evaluation.  Imaging should then be obtained for an STS, with MRI being the preferred modality for the trunk or extremities. Imaging can assist with diagnosis and delineate the extent of the primary lesion, including the relationship to contiguous structures, for treatment planning and assessing resectability. Pathology diagnosis is most commonly performed via examination of a specimen obtained through image-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy. This requires multidisciplinary planning between Surgery and Radiology to place the needle within the anticipated definitive surgical incision to allow for en bloc resection of the needle tract. Once the diagnosis of an STS is made, appropriate staging studies should be performed based on the history and physical examination and tumor histology, grade, and size. Clinical and pathology data are used to stage STS patients using the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, which incorporates the STS site, size and grade of the primary tumor, and absence or presence of nodal and distant metastatic disease. This review contains 6 figures, 6 tables and 50 references Key words: core-needle biopsy, extremity, histology, imaging, risk factors, soft tissue mass, soft tissue sarcoma, staging evaluation, trunk, tumor grade

Article Commentary: Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity and Trunk: Issues for the General Surgeon

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (8) ◽  
pp. 665-671
Author(s):  
Gerame Wells ◽  
Robert C.G. Martin ◽  
Kelly M. Mcmasters ◽  
Charles R. Scoggins
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Current Literature ◽  
Medical Literature ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Heterogeneous Group ◽  
General Surgeon ◽  
Academic Interest ◽  
General Surgeons

Soft tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of malignant tumors that arise from mesenchymal tissues. The majority of these tumors arise on the extremity or trunk. Despite their rarity, soft tissue sarcomas continue to generate vigorous academic interest, and as a result, the ever-expanding medical literature dealing with sarcomas continues to grow. Many general surgeons will see few of these tumors during their careers, and a review of the current literature and how it applies to patients afflicted with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity or trunk is warranted.

Combination chemotherapy using adriamycin, DTIC, cyclophosphamide, and actinomycin D for advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized comparative trial. A phase III, Southwest Oncology Group Study (7613).

1987 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 851-861 ◽  
Author(s):  
L H Baker ◽  
J Frank ◽  
G Fine ◽  
S P Balcerzak ◽  
R L Stephens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Actinomycin D ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Comparative Trial ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Southwest Oncology Group ◽  
Significant Difference

The term soft tissue sarcoma refers to a large variety of malignant tumors arising in extraskeletal connective tissues that connect, support, and surround discrete anatomic structures. All visceral organs also contain a connective stroma that can undergo malignant transformation. Because of the histological similarities of this group of tumors and their relative rarity, treatment prescriptions for patients that have disseminated disease are most often uniform. In this study, we asked the question whether adding a third drug (cyclophosphamide or actinomycin D) to Adriamycin (Adr [Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH])-(3,3-dimethyl-1-triazeno)- imidazole-4-carboxamide (DTIC) would improve the response rate and/or survival. A unique feature of this cooperative group clinical trial was the mandatory pathology review of the histological material. All patients of the Southwest Oncology Group between June 1, 1976, and November 17, 1979, who had a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis of a soft tissue sarcoma with convincing clinical or biopsy-documented evidence of metastatic disease were eligible for the study. Patients were randomized to receive (1) Adr, 60 mg/m2 intravenously, day 1, and DTIC, 250 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (104 patients); (2) Adr and DTIC as in (1) and cyclophosphamide, 500 mg/m2, day 1 (112 patients); or (3) Adr and DTIC as in (1) and actinomycin D, 1.2 mg/m2, day 1, (119 patients). There was no statistically significant difference in response rates (33%, 34%, and 24%) (P = .25). Median durations of response were 31 weeks in the Adr-DTIC arm, 26 weeks in the cyclophosphamide-DTIC-Adr arm, and 23 weeks in the Adr-DTIC-Actinomycin D arm (P = .78). Median durations of survival were 37, 42, and 50 weeks, respectively. Again, no statistically significant differences were observed (P = .59). Toxicities from each of these treatment arms were formidable and were equivalent. Prognostic factor analysis showed a prognosis based on bone marrow reserve, sex, and pathology subtype favorable to patients.

scholarly journals A case of marantic endocarditis with systemic emboli in a patient with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Daniel Alexander Reikher ◽  
Mark Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Tissue Injury ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Mass Effect ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Rare Group ◽  
Marantic Endocarditis

Clinical manifestations of cancer can be categorized as resulting from direct tissue injury from the primary tumor, distant metastatic spread, or aberrant biological activity, also known as a paraneoplastic syndrome. Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare group of malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin which typically present with direct tissue injury, exerting their harmful potential by compression and mass effect. We describe a rare case of an occult retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma presenting with marantic endocarditis. To date, there is a paucity of available medical literature relating sarcoma to marantic endocarditis.

Real-world data of a cohort of patients with soft tissue sarcoma in a single institution of Colombia.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19259-e19259
Author(s):  
Luis Eduardo Pino ◽  
Ivan Camilo Triana ◽  
Aylen Vanessa Ospina Serrano ◽  
Javier Segovia ◽  
Diana Carolina Hennessey
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Ewing’S Sarcoma ◽  
Ewing's Sarcoma ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Pleomorphic Sarcoma

e19259 Background: Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) are a group of neoplasm with huge histological diversity and biological behaviors. They have a low prevalence and lack of data, especially in Colombia where there is no specific report of this disease. The objective of this study is to describe clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcoma at Fundación Santafe, a university hospital located in Bogotá. Methods: This is an observational study of a cohort of soft tissue sarcoma patients treated at a single institution with a follow-up of 4 years (2015 - 2019). Clinical, molecular and epidemiological variables were registered, and overall survival was calculated for stage IV sarcomas. For the survival analysis a Kaplan Meier model was used. Results: Twenty-four patients were included. The histologies reported were: Pleomorphic sarcoma 25.0%, Ewing's sarcoma 20.8%, liposarcoma 16.7%, chondrosarcoma 8.3%, leiomiosarcoma 8.3%, synovial sarcoma 8.3%, soft part alveolar sarcoma 8.3%, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans 4.3%. OSm for the whole stage IV group was: 30.22m, according to subtypes OSm was: Ewing's sarcoma 37.13 OSm, liposarcoma 11 OSm, chondrosarcoma 12.3 OSm. Only 3 of the cases (2 Ewing's sarcoma and 1 alveolar sarcoma) had multigenic platform information. In these cases, main mutations in BCL2, SOX9, SATB2 and TFE3 were described. In two of the cases PDL1 expression was done with a negative result ( < 1%) (pleomorphic sarcoma and Ewing's sarcoma). Ifosfamide and anthracyclines was the most frequent chemotherapy regimen used, but in two of the cases checkpoint inhibitors were initiated. Conclusions: This real-world cohort of STS have a similar clinical and epidemiological distribution to historic cohorts, but our OSm for Ewing's sarcoma stage IV is longer than reported, even with a case of complete remission after consolidation with autologous bone marrow transplant. Other histologies had a worse prognosis with a less than 12 m OSm. Genomic data were scarce and useless for directed therapies or immunotherapy as usual in STS. [Table: see text]

Evaluation of a Soft Tissue Mass in the Extremity or Trunk

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel C Thomas ◽  
Dale Han
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Physical Examination ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Mass ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Needle Tract

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) represents a diverse group of malignant tumors derived from mesenchymal elements. Evaluation of a soft tissue mass of the trunk or extremity starts with a detailed history and physical examination, which will help guide further diagnostic evaluation.  Imaging should then be obtained for an STS, with MRI being the preferred modality for the trunk or extremities. Imaging can assist with diagnosis and delineate the extent of the primary lesion, including the relationship to contiguous structures, for treatment planning and assessing resectability. Pathology diagnosis is most commonly performed via examination of a specimen obtained through image-guided percutaneous core-needle biopsy. This requires multidisciplinary planning between Surgery and Radiology to place the needle within the anticipated definitive surgical incision to allow for en bloc resection of the needle tract. Once the diagnosis of an STS is made, appropriate staging studies should be performed based on the history and physical examination and tumor histology, grade, and size. Clinical and pathology data are used to stage STS patients using the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, which incorporates the STS site, size and grade of the primary tumor, and absence or presence of nodal and distant metastatic disease. This review contains 6 figures, 6 tables and 50 references Key words: core-needle biopsy, extremity, histology, imaging, risk factors, soft tissue mass, soft tissue sarcoma, staging evaluation, trunk, tumor grade

scholarly journals Primary multiple synchronous tumors: soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneal space and metastatic prostate cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-178
Author(s):  
O. A. Mailyan ◽  
K. Yu. Kanukoev ◽  
P. G. Berezin ◽  
K. M. Nyushko ◽  
V. A. Gorbach
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Multiple Malignancies

At the present time primary-multiple malignancies are of interest in connection with the frequency of prevalence, which remains at the rather high level and continues to grow up, therefore increasing the relevance of this pathology in clinical oncology and everyday practice. With the exception of the treatment of primary multiple malignancies requiring a multimodal approach, as well as in the case of the use of complex treatment in conjunction with chemotherapists and radiotherapy specialists. In the past three decades, the development of screening tests that prevent and detect some cancers at an early, more treatable stage, and treatment advances have increased the 5‑year relative survival rate for all cancers to 66%. In addition to concerns about cancer recurrence, survivors also worry about their risk of developing a new cancer. Prostate cancer is a leader in terms of morbidity and mortality in the world, just as often are found in combination with other malignant tumors. However, given the high detectability of prostate cancer, primary patients are currently receiving radical treatment, and if metastatic prostate cancer is detected, they are receiving drug treatment, which improves the survival and quality of life of patients. Soft tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors that develop in the connective tissues and remain poorly understood due to the fact that they make up less than 1% of all malignant diseases. One of the main methods for treating soft tissue sarcomas is the surgical method. Soft tissue sarcomas are difficult to treat and therefore it is imperative that surgeons and other specialists have experience in treating this disease. Studies show that patients with this pathology show better results if they receive treatment in specialized cancer centers that have experience in treating soft tissue sarcoma. This article demonstrates the clinical case of surgical treatment of a patient with primary multiple retroperitoneal tumors and metastatic prostate cancer.

scholarly journals Non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma in a neonate, a rare and aggressive disease: case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Tanvi Khanna ◽  
Kunal Das ◽  
B. P. Kalra
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Anterior Abdominal Wall ◽  
Soft Tissue Mass ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Disease Case ◽  
Variable Success ◽  
Rare Group

Neonatal soft tissue sarcomas are a rare group of tumors. The behavior and aggressiveness of neonatal STS is variable. Surgical excision has been noted to be most important factor affecting outcome. However, when non-mutilating surgery is not possible, or resection is incomplete, chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been tried with variable success. We encountered a case of a neonate having large soft tissue mass at anterior abdominal wall. Biopsy and immunohistochemistry confirmed it as undifferentiated soft tissue sarcoma. Surgical excision was incomplete with margin positivity. His disease showed recurrence in short duration of time and despite adjuvant chemotherapy, progression was noted. The child abandoned the treatment and died within 3 months of life.

scholarly journals Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Quality Assessment of Initial MRI Reports Shows Frequent Deviation from ESSR Guidelines

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 695
Author(s):  
Sebastian Weiss ◽  
Alexander Korthaus ◽  
Nora Baumann ◽  
Jin Yamamura ◽  
Alexander S. Spiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Tissue Mass ◽  
Musculoskeletal Radiology ◽  
Radiology Reports ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
The Masses

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare subtype of soft-tissue mass and are frequently misinterpreted as benign lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary recommended type of diagnostics. To assess the quality of primary radiology reports, we investigated whether recommended MRI report elements were included in compliance with European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) guidelines. A total of 1107 patients were evaluated retrospectively, and 126 radiological reports on patients with malignant STS were assessed for ESSR quality criteria. One or more required sequences or planes were missing in 67% of the reports. In all 126 cases, the report recognized the mass as anomalous (100%). Sixty-eight percent of the reports mentioned signs of malignancy. The majority of reports (n = 109, 87%) articulated a suspected diagnosis, 32 of which showed a mismatch with the final diagnosis (25%). Thirty-two percent of the reports had a misinterpretation of the masses as benign. Benign misinterpretations were more common in masses smaller than 5 cm (65% vs. 27%). Thirty percent of the reports suggested tissue biopsy and 6% recommended referral to a sarcoma center. MRI reports showed frequent deviations from ESSR guidelines, and protocol guidelines were not routinely met. Deviations from standard protocol and reporting guidelines could put patients at risk for inadequate therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document