Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want?

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Audrain ◽  
B Rimer ◽  
D Cella ◽  
J Garber ◽  
B N Peshkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Genetic Counselor ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
History Of ◽  
Optimal Approach ◽  
Medical Recommendations

PURPOSE To assess preferences for the content and process of genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility among women at high risk for breast cancer. METHODS Ninety-eight healthy women who had a family history of breast cancer in at least two first-degree relatives participated in a structured telephone survey that evaluated preferences for type of provider and the content and process of pretest education and posttest genetic counseling. RESULTS Forty-two percent of women preferred that pretest education be delivered by a genetic counselor, while 22% preferred an oncologist. This preference was positively associated with a desire to discuss psychosocial issues during the session (P = .001). For posttest counseling, 38% of women preferred an oncologist, while 20% preferred a genetic counselor. However, women who desired supportive counseling during this session were significantly more likely to prefer a genetic counselor to an oncologist (P = .02). Fewer women wished to see a primary care physician or gynecologist for pretest education (11%) or posttest counseling (22%). With regard to the counseling process, 82% of women wished to self-refer for genetic counseling, but 63% desired advice and recommendations about whether to be tested. CONCLUSION When feasible, the optimal approach may be for oncologists to work with genetic counselors to provide pretest education and medical recommendations. Elicitation of patients' preferences may be useful to determine the level of counseling services needed.

scholarly journals A Collaborative Model to Implement Flexible, Accessible and Efficient Oncogenetic Services for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: The C-MOnGene Study

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2729
Author(s):  
Julie Lapointe ◽  
Michel Dorval ◽  
Jocelyne Chiquette ◽  
Yann Joly ◽  
Jason Robert Guertin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Collaborative Model ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
Number Of Patients

Medical genetic services are facing an unprecedented demand for counseling and testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in a context of limited resources. To help resolve this issue, a collaborative oncogenetic model was recently developed and implemented at the CHU de Québec-Université Laval; Quebec; Canada. Here, we present the protocol of the C-MOnGene (Collaborative Model in OncoGenetics) study, funded to examine the context in which the model was implemented and document the lessons that can be learned to optimize the delivery of oncogenetic services. Within three years of implementation, the model allowed researchers to double the annual number of patients seen in genetic counseling. The average number of days between genetic counseling and disclosure of test results significantly decreased. Group counseling sessions improved participants’ understanding of breast cancer risk and increased knowledge of breast cancer and genetics and a large majority of them reported to be overwhelmingly satisfied with the process. These quality and performance indicators suggest this oncogenetic model offers a flexible, patient-centered and efficient genetic counseling and testing for HBOC. By identifying the critical facilitating factors and barriers, our study will provide an evidence base for organizations interested in transitioning to an oncogenetic model integrated into oncology care; including teams that are not specialized but are trained in genetics.

Identification and management of familial breast cancer in Austria

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian F. Singer ◽  
Yen Y. Tan ◽  
Christine Rappaport
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Familial Breast Cancer ◽  
Prophylactic Surgery ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
Legal Implications

AbstractAimThe aim of this study is to review the legal implications, the technology, the indications and the management of women with a familial background of breast and/or ovarian cancer.MethodsWe have reviewed the literature and national Austrian guidelines to describe the uptake of genetic counseling and the management options offered in Austria.ResultsGenetic testing for theConclusionWhile readily available country-wide counseling has led to an increase in counseling and testing, Austrian legislation mandates “non-directional counseling” resulting in a comparatively low uptake of prophylactic surgery.

Use of the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 236-236
Author(s):  
Hilary B. Kershberg ◽  
Monica Alvarado ◽  
Jaime L. Natoli ◽  
Emily Parkhurst ◽  
Hui Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Phone Call ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Clinical Genetic ◽  
Increased Risk

236 Background: Diagnosis of breast cancer at a young age is an indication for genetic counseling and possible BRCA testing. However, not all women with this early diagnosis are referred for genetic counseling, especially if they do not have a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Methods: The genetics department in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) provides clinical genetic services in an integrated health care system serving over 3.6 million members. Using data from the KPSC tumor registry, the KPSC EMR system, and a departmental cancer test results database, we identified 454 women diagnosed with early breast cancer (<46 years) between September 2005 and September 2010 who had not received genetic counseling. We contacted these women with a letter and/or phone call offering a genetics consultation, and we offered BRCA testing to all those who came for counseling. Results: 142 women (31%) came in for genetic counseling, and 312 women (69%) declined, did not keep their appointment, or never responded. Hispanics were more likely to schedule and keep an appointment than Caucasians (OR=1.35, 95% CI, 0.79-2.31), although this was not statistically significant. Of those who came in for counseling, African Americans were significantly less likely to accept genetic testing than Caucasians (OR=0.31, 95% CI, 0.10-0.98).Of the 142 patients who were counseled, 122 (86%) accepted testing. We identified 6 patients (5%) who were positive for a deleterious BRCA mutation and 6 patients (5%) who had a variant of uncertain significance. Of the 6 women with deleterious mutations, only 1 had a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, and 4 had mutation probabilities <10%. Conclusions: This project demonstrates how an integrated care approach and EMR system provide an opportunity to identify and contact women who are at increased risk for inherited cancer susceptibility.

The impact of Angelina Jolie's (AJ) story on genetic referral and testing at an academic cancer centre.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 44-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacques Raphael ◽  
Sunil Verma ◽  
Paul Hewitt ◽  
Andrea Eisen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Before And After ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Media ◽  
The Impact

44 Background: In May 2013, AJ revealed to the media that she had undergone preventive double mastectomy. The actress had a family history of breast and ovarian cancer and tested positive for the BRCA1 gene mutation. Media coverage has been extensive, but it’s not clear what messages the public and professional medical staff took from this personal story that sometimes could be misleading. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review in our centre using data from the clinical database of the Familial Cancer Program in a tertiary care cancer centre. The impact of AJ’s story on genetic counseling referrals was assessed by comparing the number of referrals made 6 months before and after the story. In addition, the quality of referrals was reported by comparing the number of patients who qualified for genetic testing as defined by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care and the ones who carried a BRCA1/2 mutation before and after the media release. Results: The number of women referred for genetic counseling increased by 85% after the release of AJ’s story (479 before versus 887 after). This translated to an increase of 99% in the number of women who qualified for a genetic testing (211 before versus 419 after). Among them, 120 and 254 women had a history of breast and ovarian cancer in their family, 16 and 37 women had a history of male breast cancer in their family, and 28 and 15 women were diagnosed with breast cancer at the age of 35 or less before and after AJ’s story respectively. Furthermore, the number of BRCA1/2 carriers identified increased by 107% (29 (14 BRCA1, 15 BRCA2) before and 60 (32 BRCA1, 28 BRCA2) after). Conclusions: This study clearly shows that the number of genetic referrals doubled after AJ’s story. Nevertheless, the quality of referral remained the same with nearly the same percentage of patients who qualified for genetic testing and who were identified as BRCA1/2 carriers. The challenge is to meet the increased demand for cancer genetic services including screening, counseling, testing, and preventive surgery. After AJ’s story the current model of genetic counseling may need to be revisited.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA 2 and other mutations in Chilean population.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13553-e13553
Author(s):  
Carolina Selman ◽  
Mabel Hurtado ◽  
Badir Chahuan ◽  
Fabiola Mella ◽  
Hugo Marsiglia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Genetic Test ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Brca 2 ◽  
Post Test ◽  
History Of ◽  
Chilean Population

e13553 Background: Arturo López Pérez Foundation (FALP) is a Chilean Institution aimed to treatment of cancer patients. Since 2016 it has an Unit for Oncological Genetic Counseling (AGO) for patients with warning flags of potential cases of cancer of genetic origin AGO Unit is aimed to capture patients with warning flags and deliver information through pre-test counseling, offer possibility of a genetic test and post-test counseling. The purpose of this review is to provide relevant results of four years of this Unit. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out from patient care in the Oncological Genetic Counseling Unit of FALP between 2016 and 2019. It was considered those cases in which the process of pretest/post-test counseling was performed. Six "warningflags" were established: cancer in patients under 50 years of age, triple negative breast cancer, breast cancer in men, ovarian cancer, history of 2 or more primary cancers and a family history of cancer The number of test performed was analyzed. The results were expressed in positive pathogenic variants, uncertain variants and negative results. Results: 365 genetic counseling processes were carried out during the period. The average consultation age was 43.2 years (20.8 and 75.5) and 90.1% (329 attentions ) were female. Of the patients, 79.7% (294) perform the genetic test. 18.5% tested positive for a pathogenic variant, 6.5% for a pathogenic variant plus an uncertain variable, and 2.8% for two pathogenic variants. The mutations found were BRCA2 32.6% BRCA1 29.1%, ATM 10.1% RAD51C 6.7% CDKN2 A 5.6%, MUTYH 3.4% TP53 3.4%, MSH2 3.4% RAD51D 2.4%), NF1 1.1%, NTHL1 1.1%, RET 1.1% A 64.9% (237 patients) had cancer diagnosed at the time of the consultation, versus 33.1% of healthy care. 2% had no information. The type of cancer present was 79.7% breast cancer (189), 8.0% ovarian cancer, 2.1% thyroid cancer, 1.7% breast and ovarian cancer, 0.9% colon and/or endometrial cancer and 7.6% other cancers. The warning flags present were 41.2% age below 50 years, 26.2% family history, 15.4% relatives of people with positive results, 8.5% patients with triple-negative breast cancer, 5.3% patients with ovarian cancer, 2.8% patients with 2 or more primary cancers, and 0.6% male breast cancer patients. Conclusions: The highest percentage of patient care was for women with breast cancer, under 50 years of age. The overall test positivity rate is a cumulative 29%. Mutations in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 were the most detected mutations, as reported in the literature. The slight predominance of BRCA 2 may be due to a familiar component. This is the largest report made in the Chilean population.

scholarly journals A Case Report of Germline Compound Heterozygous Mutations in the BRCA1 Gene of an Ovarian and Breast Cancer Patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 889
Author(s):  
Ava Kwong ◽  
Cecilia Y. S. Ho ◽  
Vivian Y. Shin ◽  
Chun Hang Au ◽  
Tsun Leung Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 Gene ◽  
Pathogenic Mutation ◽  
Compound Heterozygous ◽  
Strong Family History ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Pathogenic Mutations ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

The germline carrier of the BRCA1 pathogenic mutation has been well proven to confer an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Despite BRCA1 biallelic pathogenic mutations being extremely rare, they have been reported to be embryonically lethal or to cause Fanconi anemia (FA). Here we describe a patient who was a 48-year-old female identified with biallelic pathogenic mutations of the BRCA1 gene, with no or very subtle FA-features. She was diagnosed with ovarian cancer and breast cancer at the ages of 43 and 44 and had a strong family history of breast and gynecological cancers.

scholarly journals Survey on Physicians’ Knowledge and Training Needs in Genetic Counseling in Germany

Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Julia Dick ◽  
Viktoria Aue ◽  
Simone Wesselmann ◽  
Anne Brédart ◽  
Sylvie Dolbeault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
High Throughput Sequencing ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
Genetic Test Results ◽  
Disease Risks ◽  
And Training

<b><i>Background:</i></b> In recent years, germline testing of women with a risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer has increased rapidly. This is due to lower costs for new high-throughput sequencing technologies and the manifold preventive and therapeutic options for germline mutation carriers. The growing demand for genetic counseling meets a shortfall of counselors and illustrates the need to involve the treating clinicians in the genetic testing process. This survey was undertaken to assess their state of knowledge and training needs in the field of genetic counseling and testing. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A cross-sectional survey within the European Bridges Study (Breast Cancer Risk after Diagnostic Gene Sequencing) was conducted among physician members (<i>n</i> = 111) of the German Cancer Society who were primarily gynecologists. It was designed to examine their experience in genetic counseling and testing. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, the study revealed a need for training in risk communication and clinical recommendations for persons at risk. One-third of respondents communicated only relative disease risks (31.5%) instead of absolute disease risks in manageable time spans. Moreover, almost one-third of the respondents (31.2%) communicated bilateral and contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy as an option for healthy women and unilateral-diseased breast cancer patients without mutations in high-risk genes (e.g. <i>BRCA1</i> or <i>BRCA2)</i>. Most respondents expressed training needs in the field of risk assessment models, the clinical interpretation of genetic test results, and the decision-making process. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The survey demonstrates a gap of genetic and risk literacy in a relevant proportion of physicians and the need for appropriate training concepts.

Uptake of genetic counseling and testing in a clinic based population of women with breast cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10524-10524
Author(s):  
Alexandra Wehbe ◽  
Mark A. Manning ◽  
Hadeel Assad ◽  
Kristen Purrington ◽  
Michael S. Simon
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
White Women ◽  
Private Insurance ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility Genes ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
Stage Iv Disease

10524 Background: Carriers of pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes have an elevated risk of developing breast, ovarian, and other cancers.We conducted a medical record review to determine the uptake of genetic counseling and testing in a clinic-based population of women with breast cancer. Methods: Medical records of 150 women with breast cancer seen at the Karmanos Cancer Institute between January-December 2018 were reviewed to determine the proportion eligible for genetic testing according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We also assessed genetics referral rates, appointment completion and results of genetic testing. Using chi-square and ANOVA tests, we analyzed the association of demographic and clinical factors with eligibility and referral to genetic counseling. Results: The average age of diagnosis was 57.1 years old, with 68.7% of women diagnosed with stage I-III disease, and 31.3% diagnosed with stage IV disease. There were 91 (60.7%) women who met NCCN criteria for genetic testing, of which 46.2% ultimately underwent genetic testing. Eligible women were more likely to be younger (52.6 vs. 64.0 years old), White (75.0% vs. 54.5%), and have Medicaid (75.0%) or private insurance (72.9%) vs. Medicare (44.8%). Women who met NCCN criteria were 3.5 times more likely to be referred for genetic counseling than those that did not meet eligibility criteria. Women were also more likely to be referred if they had early-stage disease compared to stage IV (67.8% vs. 48.3%), and Medicaid or private insurance compared to Medicare (71.4%, 72.0% and 40.0%, respectively). Of eligible women, 59.3% had a genetic counseling appointment scheduled, and of those, 78.0% attended their appointment. There were no apparent differences in appointment completion based on race with similar percentages of Black and White women completing their appointments (74.0% and 77.0% respectively). Women with stage IV disease were more likely to complete their appointments (83.0%) compared to women with stages I-III (74.0%) and fewer women with Medicare completed their genetic counseling appointment (56.0%) compared to women with Medicaid (83.0%) and women with private insurance (83.0%). Among women who attended their appointment, 95.9% underwent genetic testing. Of women who had genetic testing, 8.5% had a pathogenic variant and 30.4% had a variant of unknown significance. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that lack of genetic counseling referrals contribute to a gap between the need for and completion of genetic testing. By understanding barriers to genetic counseling and testing, future clinical initiatives could effectively improve accessibility to genetic counseling services.

scholarly journals Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 337-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kathleen Ladd ◽  
Beth N Peshkin ◽  
Leigha Senter ◽  
Shari Baldinger ◽  
Claudine Isaacs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Prophylactic Surgery ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Affective Factors ◽  
Risk Reducing

Abstract Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) and salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) are increasingly used to reduce breast and ovarian cancer risk following BRCA1/BRCA2 testing. However, little is known about how genetic counseling influences decisions about these surgeries. Although previous studies have examined intentions prior to counseling, few have examined RRM and RRSO intentions in the critical window between genetic counseling and test result disclosure. Previous research has indicated that intentions at this time point predict subsequent uptake of surgery, suggesting that much decision-making has taken place prior to result disclosure. This period may be a critical time to better understand the drivers of prophylactic surgery intentions. The aim of this study was to examine predictors of RRM and RRSO intentions. We hypothesized that variables from the Health Belief Model would predict intentions, and we also examined the role of affective factors. Participants were 187 women, age 21–75, who received genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. We utilized multiple logistic regression to identify independent predictors of intentions. 49.2% and 61.3% of participants reported intentions for RRM and RRSO, respectively. Variables associated with RRM intentions include: newly diagnosed with breast cancer (OR = 3.63, 95% CI = 1.20–11.04), perceived breast cancer risk (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.17–1.81), perceived pros (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.38–2.32) and cons of RRM (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.65–0.996), and decision conflict (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.66–0.98). Variables associated with RRSO intentions include: proband status (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09–0.89), perceived pros (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.11–1.63) and cons of RRSO (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59–0.89), and ambiguity aversion (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.65–0.95). These data provide support for the role of genetic counseling in fostering informed decisions about risk management, and suggest that the role of uncertainty should be explored further.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document