Sequence analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: correlation of mutations with family history and ovarian cancer risk.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 2417-2425 ◽  
Author(s):  
T S Frank ◽  
S A Manley ◽  
O I Olopade ◽  
S Cummings ◽  
J E Garber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Sequence Analysis ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cancer Mutations

PURPOSE Previous studies of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 have used detection methods that may underestimate the actual frequency of mutations and have analyzed women using heterogeneous criteria for risk of hereditary cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 238 women with breast cancer before age 50 or ovarian cancer at any age and at least one first- or second-degree relative with either diagnosis underwent sequence analysis of BRCA1 followed by analysis of BRCA2 (except for 27 women who declined analysis of BRCA2 after a deleterious mutation was discovered in BRCA1). Results were correlated with personal and family history of malignancy. RESULTS Deleterious mutations were identified in 94 (39%) women, including 59 of 117 (50%) from families with ovarian cancer and 35 of 121 (29%) from families without ovarian cancer. Mutations were identified in 14 of 70 (20%) women with just one other relative who developed breast cancer before age 50. In women with breast cancer, mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with a 10-fold increased risk of subsequent ovarian carcinoma (P = .005). CONCLUSION Because mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in women with breast cancer are associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, analysis of these genes should be considered for women diagnosed with breast cancer who have a high probability of carrying a mutation according to the statistical model developed with these data.

Risk of breast cancer among Japanese women with a positive family history.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
J. Suzuki ◽  
T. Hojo ◽  
K. Jimbo ◽  
S. Asaga ◽  
T. Kinoshita
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Positive Family History ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Contralateral Breast ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Second Degree

191 Background: Most breast cancer cases are sporadic, rather than associated with inherited gene mutations, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, women with a family history of breast cancer are at increased risk of developing breast cancer compared to those women without any family history, even if they lack these gene mutations. Methods: We analyzed 10892 patients including bilateral breast cancer cases (total of 11398 breast cancers) who underwent surgery at our hospital between 1962 and 2009. We excluded 295 cases whose family history data were not available. Clinical and pathological differences between following patient groups were tested; 9528 patients or 9955 cancers (88%) with negative family history (FH-), 896 patients or 951 cancers (8%) who had at least one first-degree relative with breast cancer (1FH+), 468 patients or 492 cancers (4%) who had second-degree relative with breast cancer (2FH+), and 1364 patients or 1443 cancers (12%) with family history regardless of first- or second-degree relative (FH+). Significance was established at a p-value of < 0.05. Results: Among the family members, sisters were more likely to have treated for breast cancer (38% in FH+ group), followed by mothers (27%), aunts (26%), grandmothers (7%), and daughters (2%). The incidence of developing contralateral breast cancer was significantly higher in 1FH+ group, compared to patients in FH- and 2FH+ groups. No other factors showed any significant difference, including the incidence of cancer in other organs, pathological characteristics, and age of onset, although BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation may be associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer at younger age. Outcome studies with available data did not show any significant difference in overall survival between FH+ and FH- patients. Conclusions: A Japanese woman with a positive family history has a higher risk of developing breast cancer than women without any close relatives with breast cancer, similar to the results reported in Western countries where prevalence of breast cancer is higher. Regular checkup of contralateral breast is important for those patients whose first-degree relatives have also been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Laboratory Determination of Hereditary Susceptibility to Breast and Ovarian Cancer

1999 ◽  
Vol 123 (11) ◽  
pp. 1023-1026
Author(s):  
Tom S. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prophylactic Surgery ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hereditary Susceptibility ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Abstract Inherited mutations in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, particularly before the age of 50 years, as well as an increased risk of ovarian cancer. Patients with early-onset breast cancer or ovarian cancer at any age with a family history of either disease are at higher risk of carrying a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Laboratory analysis of these genes can determine whether a patient has inherited an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. In the absence of a mutation that has been previously identified in a family member, most tests for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk analyze the entire coding sequences of BRCA1 and BRCA2. The gene sequencing process itself can be automated, but the data must be interpreted by an individual with training in molecular diagnostics. Management options generally available to individuals with hereditary susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer include heightened surveillance, prophylactic surgery, and chemoprevention. The use of genetic techniques to identify women with increased risk of cancer demonstrates the application of recent advances in the understanding of the genetic basis of malignancy to laboratory medicine and clinical care.

scholarly journals Hereditary Susceptibility to Breast Cancer: Significance of Age of Onset in Family History and Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2

1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Frank ◽  
Amie M. Deffenbaugh ◽  
Mark Hulick ◽  
Kathryn Gumpper
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Early Onset ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Early Onset Breast Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
History Of

OBJECTIVE: To correlate mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 with family history of breast cancer in a first-degree relative for women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 45 who do not have a personal or family history of ovarian cancer.METHODS: Family history for women with breast cancer diagnosed before age 45 was provided by ordering physicians via a test requisition form designed for this purpose. Gene analysis was performed by dye primer sequencing for the entire coding regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Because a personal and family history of ovarian cancer are known to be significantly associated with mutations, women with either were excluded from analysis.RESULTS: Overall, deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 were identified in 85 of 440 women (19%) with breast cancer under 45. Mutations were identified in 73 of 276 women (26%) with a first degree family history of breast cancer compared to 12 of 164 without (7%) (P <.0001). When results were analyzed by the age of diagnosis in first degree relatives, mutations were identified in 56 of 185 women (30%) with at least one first degree relative with breast cancer diagnosed before age 50 compared with 17 of 91 women (19%), where the first degree family history of breast cancer was at or over age 50 (P = .042).CONCLUSION: Among women with breast cancer diagnosed before age 45, a first-degree relative diagnosed with the disease under age 50 is an indicator of a mutation in BRCAl or BRCA2 even in the absence of a family history of ovarian cancer. Therefore, women diagnosed with early-onset breast cancer should be asked about the age of onset in any first-degree relative diagnosed with the disease, as well as about any family history of ovarian cancer. Mutations in BRCA2 account for a substantial proportion of hereditary breast cancer. Therefore, studies that are limited to BRCA1 or that do not analyze by age of onset of breast cancer in relatives may underestimate the contribution of mutations in BRCAl and BRCA2 to women with early onset breast cancer.

scholarly journals Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations Among Patients With Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal, and Fallopian Tube Cancer in India: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 849-861
Author(s):  
Sudeep Gupta ◽  
Senthil Rajappa ◽  
Suresh Advani ◽  
Amit Agarwal ◽  
Shyam Aggarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Brca1 Brca2

PURPOSE There are deficient data on prevalence of germline mutations in breast cancer susceptibility genes 1 and 2 ( BRCA1/ BRCA2) in Indian patients with ovarian cancer who are not selected by clinical features. METHODS This prospective, cross-sectional, noninterventional study in nine Indian centers included patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of BRCA1/ BRCA2 mutations, and the secondary objective was to correlate BRCA1/ BRCA2 status with clinicopathologic characteristics. Mutation testing was performed by a standard next-generation sequencing assay. RESULTS Between March 2018 and December 2018, 239 patients with a median age of 53.0 (range, 23.0-86.0 years) years were included, of whom 203 (84.9%) had newly diagnosed disease, 36 (15.1%) had family history of ovarian or breast cancer, and 159 (66.5%) had serous subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer. Germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were detected in 37 (15.5%; 95% CI, 11.1 to 20.7) and 14 (5.9%; 95% CI, 3.2 to 9.6) patients, respectively, whereas variants of uncertain significance in these genes were seen in four (1.7%; 95% CI, 0.5 to 4.2) and six (2.5%; 95% CI, 0.9 to 5.4) patients, respectively. The prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic BRCA mutations in patients with serous versus nonserous tumors, with versus without relevant family history, and ≤ 50 years versus > 50 years, were 40 of 159 (25.2%; 95% CI, 18.6 to 32.6) versus 11 of 80 (13.8%; 95% CI, 7.1 to 23.3; P = .0636), 20 of 36 (55.6%; 95% CI, 38.1 to 72.1) versus 41 of 203 (20.2%; 95% CI, 14.9 to 26.4; P < .0001), and 20 of 90 (22.2%; 95% CI, 14.1 to 32.2) versus 31 of 149 (20.8%; 95% CI, 14.6 to 28.2; P = .7956), respectively. CONCLUSION There is a high prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline BRCA mutations in Indian patients with ovarian cancer.

Genetic testing in young women with breast cancer: Results from a web-based survey

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21093-21093
Author(s):  
J. A. Shin ◽  
S. Gelber ◽  
J. Garber ◽  
R. Rosenberg ◽  
M. Przypyszny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Young Women ◽  
College Education ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of

21093 Background: Young women with breast cancer have an increased risk of harboring a BRCA1/2 mutation. The frequency of genetic testing in this population is not well described. We evaluated the reported frequency and factors associated with genetic testing among young breast cancer survivors identified through the Young Survival Coalition (YSC), an international advocacy group for young women with breast cancer. Methods: Items regarding family history and genetic testing were included in a large web-based survey addressing quality of life and fertility issues for young women with breast cancer. All YSC members were invited by email in March 2003 (N= 1,703 women) to participate in this cross-sectional survey. Results: 657 women completed the on-line survey; 622 were eligible for this analysis (age <40, no metastatic or recurrent disease). Mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 33 years; mean age when surveyed 35.5 years. Stages included: 0 (10%), I (27%), II (49%), III (12%), missing (3%). 90% of women were white; 64% married; 49% with children; 78% had at least a college education; 42% of women reported a 1st or 2nd degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, and 13% considered themselves high-risk for harboring a genetic mutation at the time of diagnosis. At the time of the survey, 23% of women had undergone genetic testing, and 26% of those tested reported that a mutation was found. In a multivariate model, women who were younger (age 36–40 vs. age =30, O.R. 2.26, p=0.004), more educated (< college vs. > college education, O.R. 2.62, p=0.0009), had a family history of breast or ovarian cancer (O.R. 3.15, p<0.0001), and had had a mastectomy (O.R. 1.99, p=0.001) were more likely to have undergone genetic testing. Non-significant covariates included: age at survey, stage, time since diagnosis, race, marital status, employment, finances, insurance, number of children, comorbidities, baseline anxiety and depression, and fear of recurrence. Conclusion: The majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer age 40 and younger do not undergo genetic testing. Younger, more educated women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer are more likely to get tested. Further research to define the appropriateness of genetic testing in this relatively high-risk population is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals The genetic analysis of a founder Northern American population of European descent identifies FANCI as a candidate familial ovarian cancer risk gene

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlin T Fierheller ◽  
Laure Guitton-Sert ◽  
Wejdan M Alenezi ◽  
Timothée Revil ◽  
Kathleen K Oros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Family History ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Familial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
History Of

AbstractSome familial ovarian cancer (OC) could be due to rare risk alleles in genes that each account for a relatively small proportion of cases not due to BRCA1 and BRCA2, major risk genes in the homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair pathway. We report a new candidate OC risk allele, FANCI c.1813C>T in a Fanconi anemia (FA) gene that plays a role upstream of the HR DNA repair pathway. This variant was identified by whole exome sequencing of a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-negative French Canadian (FC) OC family from a population exhibiting founder effects. In FCs, the c.1813C>T allele was detected in 7% (3/43) of familial and 1.6% (7/439) of sporadic OC cases; and in 3.7% (3/82) of familial breast cancer (BC) cases with a family history of OC and in 1.9% (3/158) of BC only families. This allele was significantly associated with FC BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-negative OC families (OR=5.6; 95%CI=1.6-19; p=0.006). Although FANCI c.1813C>T was detected in 2.5% (74/2950) of cancer-free FC females, carriers had a personal history of known OC risk reducing factors, and female/male carriers were more likely to have reported a first-degree relative with OC (ρ=0.037; p=0.011). Eight rare potentially pathogenic FANCI variants were identified in 3.3% (17/516) of Australian OC cases, including 10 carriers of FANCI c.1813C>T. Potentially pathogenic FANCI variants were significantly more common in AUS OC cases with a family history of OC than in isolated OC cases (p=0.027). The odds ratios (OR) were >3 for carriers of any of the seven rarest FANCI alleles, and 1.5 for c.1813C>T. Data from the OC Association Consortium revealed that the ORs for the c.1813C>T allele were highest for the most common OC subtypes. Localization of FANCD2, part of the FANCI-FANCD2 (ID2) binding complex in the FA pathway, to sites of induced DNA damage was severely impeded in cells expressing the p.L605F isoform. This isoform was expressed at a reduced level; unstable by formaldehyde or mitomycin C treatment; and exhibited sensitivity to cisplatin but not to olaparib (a poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitor). By tissue microarray analyses, FANCI protein was robustly expressed in fallopian tube epithelial cells but expressed at low-to-moderate levels in 88% (83/94) of high-grade serous carcinoma OC samples. This is the first study to describe potentially pathogenic variants in OC in a member of the ID2 complex of the FA DNA repair pathway. Our data suggest that potentially pathogenic FANCI variants may modify OC risk in cancer families.

scholarly journals Common Variants at the 19p13.1 and ZNF365 Loci Are Associated with ER Subtypes of Breast Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fergus J. Couch ◽  
Mia M. Gaudet ◽  
Antonis C. Antoniou ◽  
Susan J. Ramus ◽  
Karoline B. Kuchenbaecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Risk ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Common Variants ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Mutation Carriers

A comparison of BRCA1 and BRCA2 risk assessment models

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10034-10034
Author(s):  
S. Panchal ◽  
M. Ennis ◽  
H. Yee ◽  
V. Contiga ◽  
L. J. Bordeleau
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Risk Assessment Models ◽  
Large Breast

10034 Background: A number of models of varying complexity are available to calculate the risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation causing hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A >10% risk of carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation is commonly used to establish testing eligibility in North America (testing threshold). We have compared these risk assessment models to ascertain their utility in patients from a large breast cancer program in our tertiary referral center. Methods: Risk assessment calculations were performed using the BRCAPRO, Myriad, Manchester, and UPennII models for all new probands referred to our clinic at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto (Canada), between May and October 2005. Individuals with a known familial mutation were excluded. Pearson correlation coefficients and pairwise scatterplots were performed for each pair of models. Regression analyses were developed to explore how well the BRCAPRO model can be predicted by other models. Results: 103 probands were included in our analyses (97% female, mean age: 50 yrs, 22% of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, 52.4% affected with breast cancer, 67% with ≥ one 1st degree relative affected with breast or ovarian cancer). The proportion of probands meeting the testing threshold based on each model was: BRCAPRO (34.0%), Myriad (33.0%), Manchester (55.3%), and UPennII (46.6%). Correlations calculated for each pair of models were large (range: 0.48–0.86). In comparing two of the most clinically relevant models (BRCAPRO and UPennII), the proportion of probands meeting the testing threshold was significantly higher using the UPennII model (p=0.0036). Between these two models, a higher correlation was observed for BRCA1 than for BRCA2 (R=0.76, R=0.58, respectively). The UPennII model was the strongest univariate predictor of the BRCAPRO results. Conclusions: All risk assessment models predicted a substantial proportion of patients referred to our clinic to be eligible for testing (≥ 33% of probands). A significantly higher proportion of probands were eligible for testing when using the UPennII model compared to the BRCAPRO model. This difference is in part due to the differential inclusion of prostate/pancreatic cancers and of third degree relatives with cancer in these models. An exploration of the sensitivity and specificity of these models will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Use of the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 236-236
Author(s):  
Hilary B. Kershberg ◽  
Monica Alvarado ◽  
Jaime L. Natoli ◽  
Emily Parkhurst ◽  
Hui Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Phone Call ◽  
Brca Testing ◽  
Degree Relative ◽  
Clinical Genetic ◽  
Increased Risk

236 Background: Diagnosis of breast cancer at a young age is an indication for genetic counseling and possible BRCA testing. However, not all women with this early diagnosis are referred for genetic counseling, especially if they do not have a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Methods: The genetics department in Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) provides clinical genetic services in an integrated health care system serving over 3.6 million members. Using data from the KPSC tumor registry, the KPSC EMR system, and a departmental cancer test results database, we identified 454 women diagnosed with early breast cancer (<46 years) between September 2005 and September 2010 who had not received genetic counseling. We contacted these women with a letter and/or phone call offering a genetics consultation, and we offered BRCA testing to all those who came for counseling. Results: 142 women (31%) came in for genetic counseling, and 312 women (69%) declined, did not keep their appointment, or never responded. Hispanics were more likely to schedule and keep an appointment than Caucasians (OR=1.35, 95% CI, 0.79-2.31), although this was not statistically significant. Of those who came in for counseling, African Americans were significantly less likely to accept genetic testing than Caucasians (OR=0.31, 95% CI, 0.10-0.98).Of the 142 patients who were counseled, 122 (86%) accepted testing. We identified 6 patients (5%) who were positive for a deleterious BRCA mutation and 6 patients (5%) who had a variant of uncertain significance. Of the 6 women with deleterious mutations, only 1 had a first-degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, and 4 had mutation probabilities <10%. Conclusions: This project demonstrates how an integrated care approach and EMR system provide an opportunity to identify and contact women who are at increased risk for inherited cancer susceptibility.

Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer at the Bedside: Role of the Medical Oncologist

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 740-753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry T. Lynch ◽  
Carrie L. Snyder ◽  
Jane F. Lynch ◽  
Bronson D. Riley ◽  
Wendy S. Rubinstein
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Family History ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hereditary Breast Cancer ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Cancer Family ◽  
Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer

Purpose: To provide practical considerations for diagnosing, counseling, and managing patients at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. Design: We have studied 98 extended hereditary breast cancer (HBC)/hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) families with BRCA1/2 germline mutations. From these families, 1,315 individuals were counseled and sampled for DNA testing. Herein, 716 of these individuals received their DNA test results in concert with genetic counseling. Several challenging pedigrees were selected from Creighton University’s hereditary cancer family registry, as well as one family from Evanston/Northwestern Healthcare, to be discussed in this present report. Results: Many obstacles were identified in diagnosis, counseling, and managing patients at high risk for HBC/HBOC. These obstacles were early noncancer death of key relatives, perception of insurance or employment discrimination, fear, anxiety, apprehension, reduced gene penetrance, and poor compliance. Other important issues such as physician culpability and malpractice implications for failure to collect or act on the cancer family history were identified. Conclusion: When clinical gene testing emerged for BRCA1 and BRCA2, little was known about the efficacy of medical interventions. Potential barriers to uptake of testing were largely unexplored. Identification and referral of high-risk patients and families to genetic counseling can greatly enhance the care of the population at the highest risk for cancer. However, because premonitory physical stigmata are absent in most of these syndromes, an HBOC diagnosis may be missed unless a careful family history of cancer of the breast, ovary, or several integrally associated cancers is obtained.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document